Methods and pharmaceutical compositions of the treatment of autistic syndrome disorders

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for the treatment of an autistic syndrome disorder comprising administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of antibacterial agent.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a U.S. National Stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371, claiming benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 365 from PCT/EP2013/055834, which claims benefit of priority from EP 1230532.6, filed Mar. 20, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/773,016, filed Mar. 5, 2013, each of which is expressly incorporated herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods and pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of Autistic Syndrome Disorders.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Infantile Autistic Syndrome Disorders (ASD) include a wide range of abnormalities including a genuine incapacity to organize affective relations, behavioral anomalies in reciprocal social interactions, verbal and non-verbal communication, limited interest in the surrounding environment associated with stereotyped movements and repetitive plays

(Kanner, 1943; Levy and Hyman, 1993; Levy and Hyman, 2005; Adrien et al., 2001; Blanc et al., 2005; Bourreau et al., 2009). Research to date indicates that a genetic predisposition may play a role in the disease but one or more environmental factors must be in place for symptoms to occur including environmental contaminants and possibly maternal exposures during gestation (Persico and Bourgeron, 2006; Bourgeron, 2009; Patterson, 2002). It is suggested that genetic and environmental hazards will alter developmental programs leading to cortical and/or sub-cortical malformations and the formation of misplaced/misconnected neuronal ensembles. The first symptoms occur before 3 years of age with most likely an earlier origin. There is at present no efficient biological/pharmaceutical treatment to ASD.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method for the treatment of an autistic syndrome disorder comprising administering to a subject in need thereof with an effective amount of at least one antibacterial agent.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method for the treatment of an autistic syndrome disorder comprising administering to a subject in need thereof with an effective amount of at least one antibacterial agent.

In a particular embodiment, the subject is diagnosed with autism. As used herein, the term “autism” denotes a family of disorders of neural development that is characterized by impaired social interaction and communication, restricted and repetitive behavior accompanied with other deficits. These signs all begin before a child is three years old.

Autism affects information processing in the brain by altering how nerve cells and their synapses connect and organize; how this occurs is not well understood. The two other autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are Asperger syndrome, which lacks delays in cognitive development and language, atypical autism, diagnosed when full criteria for the other two disorders are not met, and PDD-NOS when pervasive developmental disorder are not specified.

In a particular embodiment, the subject has been previously diagnosed with a latent bacterial infection. Typically said latent bacterial infection may be detected by detecting the presence of bacterial 16S sequence in a blood sample obtained from the subject (e.g. by RT-PCR) or by performing the method as described in WO2007068831 or in US2012024701 in the blood sample, such as described in EXAMPLE 1 or 2.

As used herein the term “antibacterial agent” has its general meaning in the art. Antibacterial agents kill or inhibit the growth or function of bacteria. A large class of antibacterial agents is antibiotics. Any kind of antibiotics may be used according to the invention, but use of broad-spectrum antibiotics are particularly desirable. A broad spectrum antibiotic for use in the invention is one that possesses activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. Exemplary broad spectrum antibiotics for use in the invention include compounds falling within the following chemical classifications or categories: aminoglycosides, macrolides, ketolides, quinolones, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and beta-lactams (including the cephalosporins). In yet another embodiment, a broad spectrum antibiotic for use in the invention is one demonstrating a degree of anti-microbial activity comparable to that of any of the herein described aminoglycosides, macrolides, ketolides, quinolones, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, or beta-lactams, in particular, against species falling within four or more different microbial genuses selected from Actinomyces, Bacillus, Bordetella, Borrelia, Campylobacter, Chlamydia, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Cryptosporidium, Entamoeba, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Gardnerella, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Legionella, Leishmania, Moraxella, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasma, Neisseria, Nocardia, Proteus, Providencia, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, Serpulina, Serratia, Shigella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Suterella, Toxoplasmosis, Treponem, and Tubercle.

The first type of broad spectrum for use in the invention, are tetracyclines. Tetracyclines belong to a class that shares a four-membered ring structure composed of four fused 6-membered (hexacyclic) rings. The tetracyclines exhibit their activity by inhibiting the binding of the aminoacyl tRNA to the 30S ribosomal subunit in susceptible bacteria. Tetracyclines for use in the invention include chlortetracycline, demeclocycline, doxycycline, minocycline, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, methacycline, mecocycline, tigecycline, limecycline, and tetracycline. The tetracyclines are effective against many known organisms including α-hemolytic streptococci, nonhemolytic streptococci, gram-negative bacilli, rickettsiae, spirochetes, Mycoplasma, and Chlamydia.

Another type of broad spectrum antibiotics for use in the invention is the aminoglycosides. Aminoglycosides are compounds derived from species of Streptomyces or Micomonospora bacteria and are primarily used to treat infections caused by gram-negative bacteria. Drugs belonging to this class all possess the same basic chemical structure, i.e., a central hexose or diaminohexose molecule to which two or more amino sugars are attached by a glycosidic bond. The aminoglycosides are bactericidal that bind to the 30S ribosome and inhibit bacterial protein synthesis. They are active primarily against aerobic gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci. Aminoglycoside for use in the invention include amikacin (Amikin®), gentamicin (Garamycin®), kanamycin (Kantrex®), neomycin (Mycifradin®), netilmicin (Netromycin®), paromomycin (Humatin®), streptomycin, and tobramycin (TOBI Solution®, TobraDex®).

Yet another type of broad spectrum antibiotic for use in the invention is a macrolide. The macrolides are a group of polyketide antibiotic drugs whose activity stems from the presence of a ring (a large 14-, 15-, or 16-membered lactone ring) to which one or more deoxy sugars, usually cladinose and desosamine, are attached. Macrolides are primarily bacteriostatic and bind to the 50S subunit of the ribosome, thereby inhibiting bacterial synthesis. Macrolides are active against aerobic and anaerobic gram positive cocci (with the exception of enterococci) and against gram-negative anaerobes. Macrolides for use in the invention include azithromycin (Zithromax®), clarithromycin (Biaxin®), dirithromycin (Dynabac®), erythromycin, clindamycin, josamycin, roxithromycin and lincomycin.

Also suitable for use in the present invention are the ketolides, another type of broad spectrum antibiotic. The ketolides belong to a new class of semi-synthetic 14-membered ring macrolides in which the erythromycin macrolactone ring structure and the D-desosamine sugar attached at position 5 are retained, however, replacing the L-cladinose moiety and hydroxyl group at position 3 is a 3-keto functional group. The ketolides bind to the 23S rRNA, and their mechanism of action is similar to that of macrolides (Zhanel, G. G., et al., Drugs, 2001; 61(4):443-98). The ketolides exhibit good activity against gram-positive aerobes and some gram-negative aerobes, and possess excellent activity against Streptococcus spp. Including mefA and ermB-producing Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae. Representative ketolides for use in the invention include telithromycin (formerly known as HMR-3647), HMR 3004, HMR 3647, cethromycin, EDP-420, and ABT-773.

Yet another type of broad spectrum antibiotic for use in the invention is the quinolone class. Structurally, the quinonolones possess a 1,4 dihydro-4-oxo-quinolinyl moiety bearing an essential carboxyl group at position 3. Functionally, the quinolones inhibit prokaryotic type II topoisomerases, namely DNA gyrase and, in a few cases, topoisomerase IV, through direct binding to the bacterial chromosome. Quinolones for use in the invention span first, second, third and fourth generation quinolones, including fluoroquinolones. Such compounds include nalidixic acid, cinoxacin, oxolinic acid, flumequine, pipemidic acid, rosoxacin, norfloxacin, lomefloxacin, ofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, amifloxacin, fleroxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, clinafloxacin, sitafloxacin, pefloxacin, rufloxacin, sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, tosufloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin. Additional quinolones suitable for use in the invention include those described in Hooper, D., and Rubinstein, E., “Quinolone Antimicrobial Agents, Vd Edition”, American Society of Microbiology Press, Washington D.C. (2004).

A broad spectrum antibiotic for use in the invention may also be a sulfonamide. Drugs belonging to the sulfonamide class all possess a sulfonamide moiety, —SO₂NH₂, or a substituted sulfonamide moiety, where one of the hydrogens on the nitrogen is replaced by an organic substituent. Illustrative N-substituents include substituted or unsubstituted thiazole, pyrimidine, isoxazole, and other functional groups. Sulfonamide antiobiotics all share a common structural feature, i.e., they are all benzene sulfonamides, meaning that the sulfonamide functionality is directly attached to a benzene ring. The structure of sulfonamide antibiotics is similar to p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), a compound that is needed in bacteria as a substrate for the enzyme, dihydroptroate synthetase, for the synthesis of tetrahydro-folic acid. The sulfonamides function as by interfering with the metabolic processes in bacteria that require PABA, thereby inhibiting bacterial growth and activity. Sulfonamide antibiotics for use in the invention include the following: mafenide, phtalylsulfathiazole, succinylsulfathiazole, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamazone, sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfametopirazine, sulfametoxypiridazine, sulfametrol, sulfamonomethoxine, sulfamylon, sulfanilamide, sulfaquinoxaline, sulfasalazine, sulfathiazole, sulfisoxazole, sulfisoxazole diolamine, and sulfaguanidine.

Also suitable for use in the invention are the broad spectrum antibiotics classified structurally as beta-lactams. All members of this broad spectrum class possess a beta-lactam ring and a carboxyl group, resulting in similarities in both their pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action. The majority of clinically useful beta-lactams belong to either the penicillin group or the cephalosporin group, including cefamycins and oxacephems. The beta-lactams also include the carbapenems and monobactams. Generally speaking, beta-lactams inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis. More specifically, these antibiotics cause ‘nicks’ in the peptidoglycan net of the cell wall that allow the bacterial protoplasm to flow from its protective net into the surrounding hypotonic medium. Fluid then accumulates in the naked protoplast (a cell devoid of its wall), and it eventually bursts, leading to death of the organism. Mechanistically, beta-lactams act by inhibiting D-alanyl-D-alanine transpeptidase activity by forming stable esters with the carboxyl of the open lactam ring attached to the hydroxyl group of the enzyme target site. Beta-lactams are extremely effective and typically are of low toxicity. As a group, these drugs are active against many grampositive, gram-negative and anaerobic organisms. Drugs falling into this category include 2-(3-alanyl)clavam, 2-hydroxymethylclavam, 7-methoxycephalosporin, epi-thienamycin, acetyl-thienamycin, amoxicillin, apalcillin, aspoxicillin, azidocillin, azlocillin, aztreonam, bacampicillin, blapenem, carbenicillin, carfecillin, carindacillin, carpetimycin A and B, cefacetril, cefaclor, cefadroxil, cefalexin, cefaloglycin, cefaloridine, cefalotin, cefamandole, cefapirin, cefatrizine, cefazedone, cefazolin, cefbuperazone, cefcapene, cefdinir, cefditoren, cefepime, cefetamet, cefixime, cefinenoxime, cefinetazole, cefminox, cefmolexin, cefodizime, cefonicid, cefoperazone, ceforamide, cefoselis, cefotaxime, cefotetan, cefotiam, cefoxitin, cefozopran, cefpiramide, cefpirome, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, cefquinome, cefradine, cefroxadine, cefsulodin, ceftazidime, cefteram, ceftezole, ceftibuten, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cephalosporin C, cephamycinA, cephamycinC, cephalothin, chitinovorin A, chitinovorin B, chitinovorin C, ciclacillin, clavulanate salt, clavulanic acid, clometocillin, cloxacillin, cycloserine, deoxy pluracidomycin B and C, dicloxacillin, dihydro pluracidomycin C, epicillin, epithienamycin D, E, and F, ertapenem, faropenem, flomoxef, flucloxacillin, hetacillin, imipenem, lenampicillin, loracarbef, mecillinam, meropenem, metampicillin, meticillin (also referred to as methicillin), mezlocillin, moxalactam, nafcillin, northienamycin, oxacillin, panipenem, penamecillin, penicillin G, N, and V, phenethicillin, piperacillin, povampicillin, pivcefalexin, povmecillinam, prvmecillinam, pluracidomycin B, C, and D, propicillin, sarmoxicillin, sulbactam, sultamicillin, talampicillin, temocillin, terconazole, thienamycin, andticarcillin.

By “an effective amount” is meant a sufficient amount of the antibacterial agent to for treating autism at a reasonable benefit/risk ratio applicable to any medical treatment.

It will be understood that the total daily usage of the compounds and compositions of the present invention will be decided by the attending physician within the scope of sound medical judgment. The specific therapeutically effective dose level for any particular patient will depend upon a variety of factors including the disorder being treated and the severity of the disorder; activity of the specific compound employed; the specific composition employed, the age, body weight, general health, sex and diet of the patient; the time of administration, route of administration, and rate of excretion of the specific compound employed; the duration of the treatment; drugs used in combination or coincidental with the specific polypeptide employed; and like factors well known in the medical arts. For example, it is well within the skill of the art to start doses of the compound at levels lower than those required to achieve the desired therapeutic effect and to gradually increase the dosage until the desired effect is achieved. However, the daily dosage of the products may be varied over a wide range from 0.01 to 1,000 mg per adult per day. Preferably, the compositions contain 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 15.0, 25.0, 50.0, 100, 250 and 500 mg of the active ingredient for the symptomatic adjustment of the dosage to the patient to be treated. A medicament typically contains from about 0.01 mg to about 500 mg of the active ingredient, preferably from 1 mg to about 100 mg of the active ingredient. An effective amount of the drug is ordinarily supplied at a dosage level from 0.0002 mg/kg to about 20 mg/kg of body weight per day, especially from about 0.001 mg/kg to 7 mg/kg of body weight per day.

A combination of antibacterial agents (e.g. antibiotics) is encompassed by the present invention.

In a particular embodiment, the subjected undergoes a sustained administration with the antibacterial agent. Typically, the subject is administered with the antibacterial agent for 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 weeks.

In a particular embodiment, the subject may also be administered with antifungal agents or anti-parasitic agents.

In a particular embodiment, the subject is administered with the antibacterial agent optionally in combination with anti-fungal or anti-parasitic agents following the typical regimen: for 3 weeks per month during the 3 first months of treatment, then 15 days per month during the following three months, then 15 days every 2 months during the following 6 months and finally 3 or 4 courses of 10 days treatment the following years.

The antibacterial agent may be combined with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, and optionally sustained-release matrices, such as biodegradable polymers, to form pharmaceutical compositions.

In the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention for oral, sublingual, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous, transdermal, local or rectal administration, the active principle, alone or in combination with another active principle, can be administered in a unit administration form, as a mixture with conventional pharmaceutical supports, to animals and human beings. Suitable unit administration forms comprise oral-route forms such as tablets, gel capsules, powders, granules and oral suspensions or solutions, sublingual and buccal administration forms, aerosols, implants, subcutaneous, transdermal, topical, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intravenous, subdermal, transdermal, intrathecal and intranasal administration forms and rectal administration forms.

Preferably, the pharmaceutical compositions contain vehicles which are pharmaceutically acceptable for a formulation capable of being injected. These may be in particular isotonic, sterile, saline solutions (monosodium or disodium phosphate, sodium, potassium, calcium or magnesium chloride and the like or mixtures of such salts), or dry, especially freeze-dried compositions which upon addition, depending on the case, of sterilized water or physiological saline, permit the constitution of injectable solutions.

The pharmaceutical forms suitable for injectable use include sterile aqueous solutions or dispersions; formulations including sesame oil, peanut oil or aqueous propylene glycol; and sterile powders for the extemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable solutions or dispersions. In all cases, the form must be sterile and must be fluid to the extent that easy syringability exists. It must be stable under the conditions of manufacture and storage and must be preserved against the contaminating action of microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi.

Solutions comprising compounds of the invention as free base or pharmacologically acceptable salts can be prepared in water suitably mixed with a surfactant, such as hydroxypropylcellulose. Dispersions can also be prepared in glycerol, liquid polyethylene glycols, and mixtures thereof and in oils. Under ordinary conditions of storage and use, these preparations contain a preservative to prevent the growth of microorganisms.

The antibacterial agent of the invention can be formulated into a composition in a neutral or salt form. Pharmaceutically acceptable salts include the acid addition salts (formed with the free amino groups of the protein) and which are formed with inorganic acids such as, for example, hydrochloric or phosphoric acids, or such organic acids as acetic, oxalic, tartaric, mandelic, and the like. Salts formed with the free carboxyl groups can also be derived from inorganic bases such as, for example, sodium, potassium, ammonium, calcium, or ferric hydroxides, and such organic bases as isopropylamine, trimethylamine, histidine, procaine and the like.

The carrier can also be a solvent or dispersion medium containing, for example, water, ethanol, polyol (for example, glycerol, propylene glycol, and liquid polyethylene glycol, and the like), suitable mixtures thereof, and vegetables oils. The proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of a coating, such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersion and by the use of surfactants. The prevention of the action of microorganisms can be brought about by various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol, sorbic acid, thimerosal, and the like. In many cases, it will be preferable to include isotonic agents, for example, sugars or sodium chloride. Prolonged absorption of the injectable compositions can be brought about by the use in the compositions of agents delaying absorption, for example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin.

Sterile injectable solutions are prepared by incorporating the antibiotic(s) in the required amount in the appropriate solvent with various of the other ingredients enumerated above, as required, followed by filtered sterilization. Generally, dispersions are prepared by incorporating the various sterilized active ingredients into a sterile vehicle which contains the basic dispersion medium and the required other ingredients from those enumerated above. In the case of sterile powders for the preparation of sterile injectable solutions, the preferred methods of preparation are vacuum-drying and freeze-drying techniques which yield a powder of the active ingredient plus any additional desired ingredient from a previously sterile-filtered solution thereof.

Upon formulation, solutions will be administered in a manner compatible with the dosage formulation and in such amount as is therapeutically effective. The formulations are easily administered in a variety of dosage forms, such as the type of injectable solutions described above, but drug release capsules and the like can also be employed.

For parenteral administration in an aqueous solution, for example, the solution should be suitably buffered if necessary and the liquid diluent first rendered isotonic with sufficient saline or glucose. These particular aqueous solutions are especially suitable for intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous and intraperitoneal administration. In this connection, sterile aqueous media which can be employed will be known to those of skill in the art in light of the present disclosure. For example, one dosage could be dissolved in 1 ml of isotonic NaCl solution and either added to 1000 ml of hypodermoclysis fluid or injected at the proposed site of infusion. Some variation in dosage will necessarily occur depending on the condition of the subject being treated. The person responsible for administration will, in any event, determine the appropriate dose for the individual subject.

The antibacterial agent of the invention may be formulated within a therapeutic mixture to comprise about 0.0001 to 1.0 milligrams, or about 0.001 to 0.1 milligrams, or about 0.1 to 1.0 or even about 10 milligrams per dose or so. Multiple doses can also be administered.

In addition to the compounds of the invention formulated for parenteral administration, such as intravenous or intramuscular injection, other pharmaceutically acceptable forms include, e.g. tablets or other solids for oral administration; liposomal formulations; time release capsules; and any other form currently used.

The invention will be further illustrated by the following figures and examples.

However, these examples and figures should not be interpreted in any way as limiting the scope of the present invention.

EXAMPLE 1

The technology as described in WO2007068831 or in US2012024701 allows the detection of aqueous structures induced by certain DNA molecules that emit low frequency electromagnetic signals. These DNA sequences “sensors” are present in most bacteria potentially pathogenic in humans and induce nanostructures present in blood plasma or in certain dilutions of DNA extracted from plasma or blood cells. By performing said method the inventors demonstrate that detection of a latent bacterial infection (but not viral infection) can be made for 70 to 90% of autistic children who were included in the study. Interestingly, in a blind study, the sole autistic child that were considered as negative for the presence of a latent bacterial infection was treated with antibiotics in a long-term manner. In another example, a child who had low frequency electromagnetic signals saw them reduced after treatment and clinical improvement.

This correlation between disappearance of the low frequency electromagnetic signals of bacterial and clinical improvement on antibiotics shows that the infection is not a simple consequence but is one of the causes of autism and low frequency electromagnetic signal detection can serve as a biomarker in clinical trials.

EXAMPLE 2

Autism: The Gut-blood-brain Connection: Improved Methods for the Detection and Diagnostic of Abnormal Bacteremia in Autistic Patients

Within a decade, autism and its related disorders have become a major health problem worldwide. In most developed and even in developing countries, their incidence has been growing to more than 1% of the total child population.

The reason for this continuous increase is unclear, but cannot be ascribed to genetic changes suddenly affecting the new generations. Rather, the increased exposure to changing environmental factors may be involved.

There is mounting indication that these environmental changes occurring at the intestinal level may allow the abnormal passage of bacteria or bacterial products in the blood circulation which could then reach the brain. There is also evidence that the blood-brain barrier can become more permeable, due also to environmental changes.

Recently, the group of Williams and Lipkin has described a significant increase of a particular genus belonging to a Gram negative family (Alcaligenaceae), the bacteria Sutterella, in ileal biopsies of autistic children suffering from gastro-intestinal disturbance, as opposed to non-autistic children suffering of the same affection.

The present example describes the abnormal presence of bacterial DNA in the blood of the majority of autistic children studied, and in particular of bacterial DNA identical or close to that of the Sutterella genus.

This bacterial DNA is reduced by a long term antibiotic treatment of children which improves at the same time their clinical condition (example 3).

The detection of bacterial DNA is done by the use of two technologies:

a) One has already been described in several patent applications (WO2007068831 or in US2012024701).

In short, it consists in measuring the intensity of the electromagnetic signals emitted by some high water dilutions of DNA extracted from the plasma of such patients.

This DNA may originate from bacterial or viral DNA sequences. Filtration of the DNA solution by 100 nM porosity filters allows one to detect structures derived from bacterial DNA.

Filtration at 20 nM porosity allows one to detect small structures derived from DNA of small DNA viruses and HIV DNA.

In the case of autistic patients, we have found that a majority of those who do possess in their plasma some DNA sequences inducing nanostructures able to emit EMS. Since filtration at 100 nM was required, these nanostructures are presumed to be of bacterial origin.

This technology, in its present state, does not yet permit us to distinguish between bacterial species since the signals are similar.

However there are indications that the signals also contain the specific information for transmitting particular DNA sequences. This phenomenon has been reproduced in several independent laboratories.

b) the classical technology, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to identify the species of bacteria involved.

In a first approach, we used primers able to detect all types of Gram positive bacteria which yielded a majority of positive signals in a cohort of 22 autistic children but not in the same number of healthy children of matching age.

We also designed primers to recognize the group of Gram negative bacteria, based also on the 16 S ribosomal DNA. However our controls with pure sterile water were always positive due to the presence of small fragments contaminating bacterial DNA in various samples of that water, whatever its treatment.

Finally we used primers specific for the Sutterella genus and have clear-cut results: a large majority of the plasma of autistic children yielded a specific DNA band of the required size (260 bp) and sequencing of the bands confirm that they belong to two closely related families (Alcaligenaceae and Burkholderiaceae). Less frequently, we could detect Borrelia sequences, the agent of Lyme disease, by primers specific for its 16 S ribosomal DNA.

TABLE A
Distribution of EMS and Sutterella PCR in Autistic
Children and healthy controls (French-Italian cohort)
		EMS	PCR Suterrella
	n	+	−	+	−
Autistic	78	68 (87%)	10 (13%)	65 (83%)	13 (17%)
children
Controls	28	1 (3.5%)	27 (96.5%)	3 (10%)	25 (89%)
Legend:
EMS = Electromagnetic Signals
N = Number of patients
PCR = Polymerase Chain Reaction.

EXAMPLE 3

Clinical Study

Study: 97 children were included in the study: children diagnosed with autism (n=73), atypical autism (n=10), Dravet syndrome (n=4), Rett syndrome (n=2), Asperger syndrome (n=3), epilepsy with mental retardation (n=3) and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (n=2). 88% of the children were aged between 2.5 years old and 12 years old (min=15 months old and max =29 years old). The children received administration of broad spectrum antibiotics for 3 weeks: for children older than 8 years old with macrolides and children older less than 8 years with tetracyclines. Furthermore, the children received an antifungal agent (Triflucan) and anti-parasitic agents (Fluvermal and Flagyl). Nutritional and immunological deficiencies were also corrected.

Results: The treatment was interrupted for 17% of the children due to side effects. Slow or jagged progression was observed for 28% of the children. Rapid and regular progression was observed for 55% of the children (Tables 1 and 2). More particularly, in the first month, improvement in physical signs can be noticed. In a second time, behavioral symptoms are improved in a progressive manner. In a third time, mental progression resumed its course to where it was interrupted (psychomotrocity, learning, communication, and language and graphics). Administration of antibiotics, regular at the beginning, may become common. In some cases, the clinical improvement obtained is durable and persists after cessation of treatment.

TABLE 1
	Rapid	Slow	Insufficient	Treatment
	Progress	Progress	Progress	interrupted
Autism (n = 73)	41 (56%)	19 (26%)	8 (11%)	5 (7%)
Atypical	7	3
(n = 100)
Dravet (EMSN)	2	2
(n = 4)
Rett (n = 2)	1	1
Epilepsy with	1	1	1
mental
retardation
(n = 3)
Asperger (n = 3)			3
Gilles de la	1	1	3
Tourette
syndrome (n = 2)
TOTAL = 97	53 (55%)	27 (28%)	12 (12%)	5 (5%)

TABLE 2
	Rapid	Slow	Insufficient	Treatment
	Progress	Progress	Progress	interrupted
Autistic	32 (71%)	6 (13%)	3 (7%)	4 (9%)
children ≤ 7
years old
(n = 45)
Autistic	9 (32%)	13 (46%)	5 (18%)	1 (4%)
children > 7
years old
(n = 9)

REFERENCES

Throughout this application, various references describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains. The disclosures of these references are hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure.

Adrien J L, Rossignol-Deletang N, Martineau J, Couturier G, Barthelemy C (2001) Regulation of cognitive activity and early communication development in young autistic, mentally retarded, and young normal children. Dev Psychobiol 39:124-136.

Blanc R, Adrien J L, Roux S, Barthelemy C (2005) Dysregulation of pretend play and communication development in children with autism. Autism 9:229-245.

Bourgeron T (2009) A synaptic trek to autism. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:231-234.

Bourreau Y., Roux S., Gomot M., Bonnet-Brilhault F., Barthelemy C. (2009) Validation of the repetitive and restricted behaviour scale in autism spectrum disorders. European Child and adolescent psychiatry, Nov 18(11): 675-682.

Kanner L. (1943) Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child 2: 217-50

Levy S E, Hyman SL (1993) Pediatric assessment of the child with developmental delay. Pediatr Clin North Am 40:465-477.

Levy S E, Hyman S L (2005) Novel treatments for autistic spectrum disorders. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 11:131-142.

Patterson P H (2002) Maternal infection: window on neuroimmune interactions in fetal brain development and mental illness. Curr Opin Neurobio112:115-118.

Persico A M, Bourgeron T (2006) Searching for ways out of the autism maze: genetic, epigenetic and environmental clues. Trends Neurosci 29:349-358.

Claims

1. A method for the treatment of an autistic spectrum disorder, consisting of:

detecting a bacterial infection by bacteria of at least one of genus sutterella and genus borrelia, in a person with autistic spectrum disorder;

administering to the person with autistic spectrum disorder, a course of therapy comprising an effective amount of at least one antibacterial agent adapted to suppress the bacteria of at least one of genus sutterella and genus borrelia, and at least one antiparasitic drug for 3 weeks per month during the first 3 months of the course of therapy; and

during said administration, monitoring symptoms of the autistic spectrum disorder in the person.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said detecting comprises performing a polymerase chain reaction amplification using primers specific for bacteria of at least one of genus Suterella and genus borrelia.

3. A method of treating an autistic spectrum disorder patient, consisting of:

determining presence of a bacterial infection with an intestinal bacteria of genus sutterella and/or borrelia in the patient;

coadministering at least one antibiotic having a spectrum of activity against genus sutterella and/or borrelia bacteria and at least one antiparasitic drug, and optionally at least one antifungal drug, for 3 weeks per month during the first 3 months of coadministration;

monitoring autistic behaviors of the patient; and

interrupting administration of the at least one antibiotic and the at least one antiparasitic drug after clinical improvement is obtained.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the at least one antibiotic comprises a tetracycline or a macrolide.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the macrolide comprises azithromycin.

6. The method according to claim 3, wherein the method comprises coadministering at least one antifungal drug with the at least one antibiotic and the at least one antiparasitic drug.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the at least one fungal drug comprises fluconazole.

8. The method according to claim 3, wherein said determining comprises performing a polymerase chain reaction amplification using primers specific for bacteria of at least one of genus Suterella and genus borrelia.

9. The method according to claim 3, wherein the at least one antiparasitic drug comprises an antiparasitic drug selected from the group consisting of flubendazole and metronidazole.

10. The method according to claim 3, wherein said determining comprises detecting an emission of electromagnetic signals from bacterial DNA in a clinical specimen from the patient.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein said determining comprises detecting a change in the emission of electromagnetic signals from bacterial DNA in a second clinical specimen from the patient.

12. A method of treating a patient having autistic spectrum disorder, consisting of:

determining an infection in the patient by a bacteria of genus sutterella and/or borrelia, by an analysis of bacterial nucleic acids in blood of the patient;

coadministering to the patient at least one antibiotic having a spectrum of activity against the bacteria of at least one of genus sutterella and borrelia and at least one antiparasitic drug, and optionally at least one antifungal drug, for 3 weeks per month during the first 3 months of coadministration;

monitoring autistic behaviors of the patient during ongoing coadministration of the at least one antibiotic and the at least one antiparasitic drug to the patient; and

modifying dosage of the at least one antibiotic in dependence on said monitoring.

13. The method according to claim 12, wherein said analysis of nucleic acids comprising performing polymerase chain reaction using a primer for a bacterial 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid sequence.

14. The method according to claim 12, wherein said analysis of nucleic acids comprises performing polymerase chain reaction using a primer specific for sutterella.

15. The method according to claim 12, wherein said analysis of nucleic acids comprises performing polymerase chain reaction using a primer specific for borrelia.

16. The method according to claim 12, wherein the at least one antibiotic comprises a tetracycline or a macrolide antibiotic.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the macrolide comprises azithromycin.

18. The method according to claim 12, wherein the method comprises coadministering at least one antifungal drug with the at least one antibiotic and the at least one antiparasitic drug.

19. The method according to claim 12, wherein said at least one antiparasitic drug comprises at least two different antiparasitic drugs.

20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the at least one antiparasitic drug comprises flubendazole and metronidazole.