Active catalysts for the treatment of a low temperature exhaust gas stream are provided for the direct decomposition removal of NOx from an exhaust gas stream. The catalyst system may include a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide CeO2—NiO. The exhaust gas stream may be provided at a temperature of from about 400° C. to about 650° C. Methods for making the catalyst include co-precipitation techniques, using KOH as a precipitating agent. The catalyst system is configured to catalyze a decomposition of the nox to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant. The catalyst may be a cubic structure, with nickel incorporated in a cubic lattice of cerium. The catalyst composition may be represented as Ce0.5Ni0.5O2.

Patent
   10071367
Priority
May 25 2017
Filed
May 25 2017
Issued
Sep 11 2018
Expiry
May 25 2037
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
9
currently ok
11. A catalyst system for the direct decomposition removal of nox, the catalyst comprising:
a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO) represented as Ce0.5Ni0.5O2,
wherein the catalyst system is configured to catalyze a decomposition of the nox to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant.
7. A method for direct decomposition removal of nox from an exhaust gas stream, the method comprising:
flowing the exhaust gas stream through a catalyst system and exposing the exhaust gas stream to catalyst system comprising a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO) represented as Ce0.5Ni0.5O2; and
catalyzing a decomposition of the nox to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant.
1. A catalyst system for the direct decomposition removal of nox from an exhaust gas stream provided at a temperature of from about 400° C. to about 650° C., the catalyst system comprising:
a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO) represented as Ce0.5Ni0.5O2,
wherein the catalyst system is configured to catalyze a decomposition of the nox to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant.
4. A catalytic converter for the direct decomposition removal of nox from an exhaust gas stream flowing at a temperature of from about 400° C. to about 650° C., the catalytic converter comprising:
an inlet configured to receive the exhaust gas stream into an enclosure;
an outlet configured to allow the exhaust gas stream to exit the enclosure; and
a catalyst system contained inside the enclosure, the catalyst system comprising a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO) represented as Ce0.5Ni0.5O2, configured to catalyze a decomposition of the nox to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant.
2. The catalyst system according to claim 1, wherein the catalyst system comprises a cubic structure, with nickel incorporated in a cubic lattice of cerium.
3. The catalyst system according to claim 1, configured to provide an nox selectivity to N2 greater than about 95%.
5. The catalytic converter according to claim 4, wherein the catalyst system comprises a cubic structure, with nickel incorporated in a cubic lattice of cerium.
6. The catalytic converter according to claim 4, configured to flow the exhaust gas stream through the catalyst system at a temperature at or greater than about 400° C. and obtaining an nox selectivity to N2 greater than about 95%.
8. The method according to claim 7, further comprising forming the catalyst system using co-precipitation techniques.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the catalyst system is formed having a cubic structure, with nickel incorporated in a cubic lattice of cerium.
10. The method according to claim 7, comprising flowing the exhaust gas stream through the catalyst system at a temperature of from about 400° C. to about 650° C., and obtaining an nox selectivity to N2 greater than about 95%.

The present disclosure generally relates to catalysts for treatment of an exhaust gas stream and, more particularly, to mixed oxide catalysts containing cerium oxide and nickel oxide for the removal of nitrogen oxides from an exhaust gas stream as generated by an internal combustion engine, or the like.

The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it may be described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present technology.

Catalysts effective at removing NOx from exhaust emissions are desirable in order to protect the environment and to comport with regulations directed to that purpose. It is preferable that such catalysts convert NOx to inert nitrogen gas, instead of converting NOx to other nitrogen-containing compounds. Catalysts that are effective at low temperature may have additional utility for vehicles.

Increasingly stringent NOx emission and fuel economy requirements for vehicles and automobile engines will require catalytic NOx abatement technologies that are effective under lean-burn conditions. Direct NOx decomposition to N2 and O2 is an attractive alternative to NOx traps and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for this application, as NOx traps and SCR processes are highly dependent on reductants (such as unburned hydrocarbons or CO) to mitigate NOx. The development of an effective catalyst for direct NOx decomposition would eliminate the use of reducing agents, simplifying the NOx removal process, and therefore decreasing the fuel efficiency cost of NOx abatement.

However, most catalysts active for direct NOx decomposition are only efficient at high temperatures (i.e., greater than about 600° C.), which severely limits a practical application for a vehicle exhaust gas stream. The most well-known low temperature (i.e., less than about 500° C.) direct NOx decomposition catalysts include Cu-ZSM5, K/Co3O4, Na/Co3O4, CuO, and Ag/Co3O4. However, low temperature activity and selectivity to N2 for all of these catalysts is not sufficient for practical application, and more advancements are needed. Advancements in direct NOx decomposition catalysis based on structure activity relationships are lacking, and methodology to improve the performance of specific catalyst systems is needed.

Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a catalyst for the removal of NOx from exhaust gas, that is effective at low temperature and that has high N2 product specificity.

This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.

In various aspects, the present teachings provide a catalyst system for the direct decomposition removal of NOx from an exhaust gas stream. The exhaust gas stream may be provided at a temperature of from about 400° C. to about 650° C. The catalyst system may include a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO). Methods for making the catalyst include co-precipitation techniques, using KOH as a precipitating agent. The catalyst system is configured to catalyze a decomposition of the NOx to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant. The catalyst may be a cubic structure, with nickel incorporated in a cubic lattice of cerium. The catalyst composition may be represented as Ce0.5Ni0.5O2.

In other aspects, the present teachings provide a catalytic converter for the direct decomposition removal of NOx from an exhaust gas stream. The exhaust gas stream may be flowing through the catalytic converter at a temperature of from about 400° C. to about 650° C. The catalytic converter may include an inlet configured to receive the exhaust gas stream into an enclosure, and an outlet configured to allow the exhaust gas stream to exit the enclosure. A catalyst system may be contained inside the enclosure, the catalyst system including a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO), configured to catalyze a decomposition of the NOx to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant. The catalyst may be a cubic structure, with the composition Ce0.5Ni0.5O2.

In still further aspects, the present teachings provide methods for the direct decomposition removal of NOx from a low temperature exhaust gas stream. The methods may include flowing the exhaust gas stream through a catalyst system. This includes exposing the exhaust gas stream to a catalyst system including a mixed oxide composition including cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO). The exposure results in catalyzing a decomposition of the NOx to generate N2 without the presence of a reductant. In various aspects, the catalyst may be a cubic structure, with the composition Ce0.5Ni0.5O2. Flowing the exhaust gas stream through the catalyst system at a temperature at or greater than about 400° C. may result in obtaining an NOx selectivity to N2 greater than about 95%.

Further areas of applicability and various methods of enhancing the above coupling technology will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.

The present teachings will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates NO conversion profiles (activity) over CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts with respect to the reaction temperature;

FIG. 2 illustrates N2 selectivity profiles over CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts with respect to a reaction temperature range from 400° C. to 650° C.;

FIG. 3 illustrates x-ray diffraction profiles of the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts after calcination;

FIG. 4 illustrates in situ FT-IR spectra of the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts during NOx adsorption at a temperature of about 300° C.;

FIG. 5 provides the N2 desorption profile over the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts from about 100° C. to about 700° C.;

FIG. 6 provides the O2 desorption profile over the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts from about 100° C. to about 700° C.;

FIG. 7 provides the N2O desorption profile over the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts from about 100° C. to about 700° C.; and

FIG. 8 provides the NO2 desorption profile over the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts from about 100° C. to about 700° C.

It should be noted that the figures set forth herein are intended to exemplify the general characteristics of the methods, algorithms, and devices among those of the present technology, for the purpose of the description of certain aspects. These figures may not precisely reflect the characteristics of any given aspect, and are not necessarily intended to define or limit specific embodiments within the scope of this technology. Further, certain aspects may incorporate features from a combination of figures.

The present teachings provide an active catalyst for the treatment of a low temperature exhaust gas stream. This technology is specifically related to the development of new catalysts for direct NOx decomposition to nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2). More specifically, the present teachings disclose a mixed oxide catalyst, co-precipitated having cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO). This mixed oxide catalyst, with the composition Ce0.5Ni0.5O2, exhibits nearly 100% selectivity to N2 product formation from 400° C. to 650° C. As detailed herein, the addition of NiO mixed with a CeO2 catalyst increases the activity (i.e., rate of N2 production per mass of catalyst) by a multiple of about twenty (20) times at a temperature of about 400° C., and increases the activity by a multiple of about 10,000 times at a temperature of about 650° C., as compared to a CeO2 catalyst without.

Direct decomposition, as discussed herein, refers to catalytic transformation of nitrogen oxides to elemental nitrogen and oxygen. This differs, for example, from catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides to ammonia and water. The low temperature (i.e., from about 400° C. to about 650° C.), direct decomposition is accomplished without the need of a reductant or secondary reducing reagents (i.e., H2, CO, C3H6 or other hydrocarbons, and/or soot), thereby improving fuel efficiency. This is greatly beneficial to improve the energy utilization of a vehicle engine because the reducing agents of carbon monoxide and unburnt hydrocarbons are produced as a result of inefficient combustion.

The composition of the present teachings, Ce0.5Ni0.5O2, otherwise referred to herein as a mixed oxide catalyst, co-precipitated having cerium oxide and nickel oxide (CeO2—NiO), is a cubic structure that exhibits stable direct NOx decomposition activity beginning at about 400° C. The CeO2—NiO catalyst system exhibits better direct NOx decomposition activity as compared to the component oxide CeO2 alone, in the relevant temperature range of from about 400° C. to about 650° C. Additionally, the CeO2—NiO catalyst system exhibits almost 100% selectivity to N2 at temperatures in the range of from about 400° C. to about 650° C. Previously, no ceria-based mixed oxide has been known for direct NOx decomposition at temperatures lower than about 600° C.

The presently disclosed catalyst system includes methods for dispersing nickel oxide within a metal oxide support, specifically an oxide support with known N2O decomposition activity (i.e., CeO2), via co-precipitation techniques. This method particularly provides for improved total yield of product N2 and product selectivity to N2 (versus undesired N2O and/or NO2 products) during low temperature direct NOx decomposition as compared to either the bare CeO2 support only or NiO. Because of the high selectivity to N2 for the present teachings, the undesirable N2O product is not produced in a significant quantity during the direct NO decomposition over Ce0.5Ni0.5O2.

As detailed herein, the present teachings not only include the development of the catalyst system, but also the utilization of the catalyst system with exhaust gas streams, particularly with catalytic converters for vehicles, automobiles, and the like, as well as including methods of synthesizing the CeO2—NiO catalyst system.

The catalyst systems of the present disclosure can be used in a chamber or an enclosure, such as a catalytic converter, having an inlet and an outlet. As is commonly known to those of ordinary skill in the art, such a chamber or enclosure can be configured to receive an exhaust gas stream through the inlet and to exit the exhaust gas stream through the outlet, such that the exhaust gas stream has a particular or defined flow direction.

Various aspects of the present disclosure are further illustrated with respect to the following Examples. It is to be understood that these Examples are provided to illustrate specific embodiments of the present disclosure and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present disclosure in or to any particular aspect.

Synthesis and Material Characterization

The CeO2—NiO can be synthesized using a co-precipitation method with KOH as a precipitating agent. For example, CeO2 and NiO can be synthesized for reference and comparison using a precipitation method.

CeO2—NiO synthesis (1:1 Ni:Ce molar ratio): The precursors used are ammonium cerium nitrate and nickel nitrate. In a typical synthesis, the required quantities of ammonium cerium nitrate and nickel nitrate are dissolved separately in deionized water and then mixed together. Next, a 1M KOH solution can be added, dropwise, to the mixed solution until precipitation completes (pH˜9). Then the resulting slurry can be filtered off and thoroughly washed with distilled water until free from K impurities. The hydroxide thus obtained can be dried at about 120° C. for about 12 hours. The final product is obtained after calcination at a temperature of about 500° C. for 5 hours, in atmospheric air.

CeO2 synthesis: The precursor used in accordance with the present teachings can be ammonium cerium nitrate. In one exemplary synthesis, the required quantity of ammonium cerium nitrate can be dissolved in deionized water. Next, a 1M KOH solution can be added, dropwise, to the ammonium cerium nitrate solution until precipitation completes (pH˜9). Then the resulting slurry can be filtered off and thoroughly washed with distilled water until free from K impurities. The hydroxide thus obtained were dried at 120° C. for 12 hours. The final product was obtained after calcination at 500° C. for 5 hours in atmosphere air.

NiO synthesis: NiO can be synthesized by the same precipitation method described above for CeO2, but instead substituting a nickel nitrate for the precursor.

Performance Evaluation and Catalyst Characterization

The phase composition of catalysts can be measured using X-ray diffraction measurements. As an example, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) measurements can be performed using a Rigaku SmartLab X-Ray Diffractometer. Spectra can be collected over a 20 range of from 20-80 degrees at a rate of 0.5 deg./min, with a step size of 0.02 deg./step. Structural assignments can be made using PDXL software. The phase composition of the materials can be determined using the ICDD-PDF database.

NO adsorption capacities of the CeO2, NiO, CeO2—NiO catalysts can be measured using a NETZSCH STA-449 thermogravimetric analyzer equipped with mass spectrometer. Before the experiment, the catalysts can be preheated to about 600° C. in the presence of 20% O2/He. After the pretreatment, the temperature can be decreased to about 100° C. Next, NO can be adsorbed by passing 2% NO/He over the catalyst for about 4 hours. The NO adsorption capacity can be calculated by measuring the weight before and after NO adsorption.

The NO adsorption properties can be measured using in situ Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic measurements. The Harrick High Temperature Cell with environmental (gas flow) and temperature control can be used for in situ diffuse-reflectance FT-IR spectroscopy. Spectra can be recorded using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 8700 Research FT-IR Spectrometer equipped with a liquid N2 cooled MCT detector. For example, Spectra can be obtained with a resolution of 2/cm and by averaging 64 scans. In situ diffuse-reflectance FT-IR spectra can be collected during NO adsorption at a temperature of about 300° C. Prior to NO adsorption, the sample can first be pretreated at a temperature of about 350° C. in 30 ml/min of 10% O2/He. The background spectrum (64 scans) can be of the catalyst after cooling to a temperature of about 300° C. in 30 ml/min of UHP He. Adsorption of NO was achieved by flowing 30 ml/min of 1% NO over the catalyst for 25 min. Adsorption of NO can be allowed to proceed for 25 min while spectra were obtained every minute using a series collection. To compare peak intensities among different catalyst samples, the adsorption spectra can be normalized to the NO gas phase peak at about 1876/cm.

The NO desorption properties can be measured using temperature programmed desorption of NO (NO-TPD) experiments. The NO-TPD experiments can be performed using a 3flex Surface Characterization Analyzer, from Micromeritics, equipped with mass spectrometer for gas phase analysis. Before the experiment, the catalysts can be preheated to a temperature of about 300° C. in the presence of 20% O2/He. After pretreatment, the temperature can be decreased to about 100° C., and NO can be adsorbed by passing 2% NO/He over the sample for about 1 hour. Following NO adsorption, physisorbed gases can be removed by passing helium for 1 hour. NO desorption properties can be measured by ramping the temperature from 100° C. to 700° C. in the presence of helium. The desorbed gases (NO, N2, O2, N2O and NO2) can be monitored by using an MKS Cirrus-2 mass spectrometer.

For direct NOx decomposition to occur, NO must directly decomposes to N2 and O2 over the catalyst surface. However, there is a possibility for unwanted N2O and NO2 formation as side products, especially in the case of NO2, where formation is thermodynamically favorable at lower reaction temperatures. The unwanted formation of N2O usually occurs if NO is only partially reduces. Therefore, in addition to high NO conversion, it is also very important to have higher selectivity towards N2+O2 formation rather than N2O or NO2. The reaction can be represented as:
(4a+4c−2b)NO→aN2+bO2+cN2O+(2a−2b+c)NO2

In this regard, the selectivity towards N2 can be defined as:
N2 selectivity (%)=2*[N2]/(2*[N2]+0.5[N2O]+[NO2])

FIG. 1 illustrates the direct NOx activity over the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts as a function of reaction temperature. As shown in FIG. 1, the NOx decomposition activity over the CeO2 alone increases slightly with increasing temperature from about 400° C. to about 450° C.; however, a further increase in the reaction temperature to about 550° C. and about 650° C. results in a decrease in the direct NOx decomposition activity. The decrease in the activity is due to the deactivation of the catalyst. On the other hand, pure NiO is almost inactive at lower reaction temperatures. However, the activity increases about 100 times with an increase in temperature of from about 450° C. to 550° C. These measurements show that CeO2 is only slightly active for direct NOx decomposition at a low temperature before deactivating, and NiO is only active at higher reaction temperatures. Remarkably, the CeO2—NiO mixed oxide catalyst system according to the present technology exhibits much better activity as compared to CeO2 or NiO alone. For example, the CeO2—NiO catalyst system exhibits about twenty (20) times higher activity than CeO2, and 100 times better activity than NiO at temperatures of about 400° C. and about 450° C. The direct NOx activity increases with increasing reaction temperature from about 400 C to about 650° C. At about 650° C., the CeO2—NiO catalyst system exhibits more than about 1,000 times increased activity than CeO2 alone.

To confirm direct NOx decomposition to N2 is taking place, rather than the unwanted side products of N2O or NO2, the N2 selectivity can be calculated as defined above. Using an FTIR detector for product analysis, it is possible to detect and quantify the concentration of NO, N2O, and NO2 species from the outlet of the reactor during direct NOx decomposition evaluation. FIG. 2 illustrates the N2 selectivity profiles calculated for the CeO2, NiO and CeO2—NiO at temperatures of from 400° C. to 650° C. As mentioned above, the NO decomposition to N2 is an important consideration for exhaust automotive emissions. The formation of the side products of N2O and NO2 are also harmful to the environment, and are not a safe alternative to exhaust containing NO alone. The CeO2 catalyst exhibits less than 10% N2 selectivity at all the reaction temperatures, meaning the majority of the NO is converting to NO2 or N2O, rather than N2. NiO also exhibits less than 1% selectivity to N2 at temperatures of about 400° C. and 450° C. The low N2 selectivity of these materials once again confirms that neither CeO2 nor NiO, by themselves, are good candidates as catalysts for direct NOx decomposition. Remarkably, CeO2—NiO catalyst systems exhibit near 100% selectivity towards N2, even at a temperature of about 400° C. The CeO2—NiO catalyst systems also exhibit near 100% N2 selectivity at temperatures of from about 450° C. to about 650° C. These results suggest that a CeO2—NiO catalyst system is a very good candidate for direct NOx decomposition since it exhibits both high overall reaction activity, and high selectivity to N2 at temperatures as low as about 400° C.

Structural and surface characterization measurements can also be performed over the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts in order to understand the influence of nickel incorporation in the cubic lattice of ceria. FIG. 3 illustrates the XRD measurements of CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts after calcination. For example, after calcination, NiO exhibits peaks at 37.07, 43.13, 62.77, 75.33, and 79.29 degrees. These 20 values correspond to reflections of (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) planes that are indications of the presence of the rock salt structure with octahedral Ni(II) and O2− sites. No other peaks are observed in FIG. 3 that suggest the purity of the sample. CeO2 exhibits peaks at 28.5, 33.02, 47.3, 56.22, 59.1, 69.26, 77.5, and 79.04 degrees. These 20 values correspond to reflections of (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (331), and (420) planes of the cubic fluorite structure of ceria. CeO2—NiO exhibits peaks due to both CeO2 and NiO phases. Compared to CeO2 alone, the CeO2—NiO exhibits a slight shift to lower 20 and a broadening of the peaks. These differences in the measurements indicate that Ni enters into the cubic fluorite structure of the ceria, and forms Ce—Ni solid solution. The crystallite sizes of CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO are calculated from the (111) plane using the Scherrer equation and are presented in Table 1. CeO2 and NiO exhibit crystallite sizes of 10.2 nm and 26.7 nm, respectively. Interestingly, CeO2—NiO exhibits smaller crystallite sizes for CeO2 (4.7 nm) and NiO (7.02 nm) compared to the pure oxides. The decrease in the crystallite size also confirms the formation of Ce—Ni solid solution.

TABLE 1
crystallite size and NOx adsorption capacities of CeO2,
NiO and CeO2—NiO catalysts
Crystallite size (nm) NO adsorption
Sample CeO2 NiO capacity (μmol/g)
CeO2 10.2 439
NiO 26.7 239
CeO2—NiO  4.7  7.0 219

The NOx adsorption capacities of CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts can be measured using TGA, and are presented in Table 1. The CeO2—NiO mixed oxide exhibits much higher NO adsorption capacity (439 μmol/g), as compared to the CeO2 (249 μmol/g) and NiO (219 μmol/g) alone. The NOx adsorption properties of CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts can be studied using in situ FT-IR spectroscopy. FIG. 4 illustrates the in situ FT-IR spectra of CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO during NOx adsorption at a temperature of about 300° C. FIG. 4 also includes a schematic representation of the intermediates formed on CeO2, NiO, CeO2—NiO during NOx adsorption. CeO2 exhibits a peak at 1190 cm−1 wavenumbers and a broad peak spanning 1470-1370 cm−1. These peaks correspond to v(N—O) and v(N═O) stretching vibrations of the monodentate nitrito species. Along with monodentate nitrito peaks, ceria also exhibits a negative peak at 1570 cm−1. The negative peaks in the in situ FT-IR spectra occur as NOx is consumed during the adsorption. As gas phase NOx is consumed during adsorption, it interacts with the CeO2 surface and makes structural changes to the surface resulting in the negative FTIR peak. Because of the structural changes during NOx adsorption, CeO2 deactivates during the direct NOx decomposition reaction. On the other hand, NiO exhibits peaks at 1234 and 1265 cm−1 and a broad peak between 1400 to 1500 cm−1 in the in situ FT-IR spectra during NOx adsorption. The peaks at 1234 and 1400-1500 cm−1 are due to the symmetric and anti-symmetric vibrations of the free nitrites, respectively. The peaks at 1265 and 1400-1500 cm−1 are due to the v(N—O) and v(N═O) stretching vibrations of the nitro-nitrato intermediates, respectively. No negative peaks are observed for NiO, which suggests that NOx is not making any structural changes to the surface, and only forms nitrite intermediates. Interestingly, the adsorption FTIR spectra for CeO2—NiO also contains no negative peaks. It exhibits additional peaks at 1250 and 1531 cm−1, along with the peaks due to the monodentate nitrate intermediates. The additional peaks are corresponding to the split mode of the chelating nitrato intermediates. These results suggest that precipitating CeO2 and NiO together to form the CeO2—NiO mixed oxide creates additional NOx adsorption sites that participate in the direct NOx decomposition mechanism as compared to either the CeO2 or NiO alone.

The NOx desorption properties of the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts can be studied using the NO temperature programmed desorption (NO-TPD) method. In a typical NO-TPD experiment, first one will adsorb the NOx at 100° C., and then ramp the temperature from about 100° C. to 700° C. in an inert gas to desorb the products. The desorbed products can be measured using a mass spectrometer. During the desorption, NO decomposes and desorbs as the main products of N2 and O2, and/or the side products of N2O and NO2. The N2, 02, N2O, and NO2 desorption temperature profiles over the CeO2, NiO, and CeO2—NiO catalysts are presented in FIGS. 5-8. As shown in FIG. 5, neither CeO2 nor NiO release product N2 until after a temperature of about 600° C. On the other hand, the CeO2—NiO mixed oxide releases N2 beginning at a temperature as low as about 100° C., and continuing throughout the entire temperature range. The product O2 release is observed at a temperature of from about 350° C. and above for CeO2 and CeO2—NiO catalysts, and at a temperature of from about 450° C. and above for NiO, as shown in FIG. 6. These measurements show that only CeO2—NiO can release both N2 and O2 at a temperature of from about 350° C., indicating its capability to perform stable direct NOx decomposition activity. As shown in the FIG. 7, CeO2 releases N2O in the temperature range of from about 100° C. to about 400° C. N2O formation occurs due to the partial reduction of NO. On the other hand, no significant N2O release is observed for the CeO2—NiO or NiO catalysts. As shown in FIG. 8, there is no NO2 formation observed over any of the catalysts.

In summary, NOx adsorption and desorption property measurements show that, as compared to the CeO2 and NiO, CeO2—NiO adsorbs more total NOx as chelating nitrato intermediates and is able release nitrogen at a temperature of from about 100° C. and oxygen from 350° C. On the other hand, NOx chemically reacts with the CeO2 during the adsorption, and makes structural changes to the CeO2 surface. Even though NiO forms nitrite intermediates during the NO adsorption, it releases N2 only at higher reaction temperatures and is active for direct NOx decomposition only at higher reaction temperatures.

The preceding description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A or B or C), using a non-exclusive logical “or.” It should be understood that the various steps within a method may be executed in different order without altering the principles of the present disclosure. Disclosure of ranges includes disclosure of all ranges and subdivided ranges within the entire range.

The headings (such as “Background” and “Summary”) and sub-headings used herein are intended only for general organization of topics within the present disclosure, and are not intended to limit the disclosure of the technology or any aspect thereof. The recitation of multiple embodiments having stated features is not intended to exclude other embodiments having additional features, or other embodiments incorporating different combinations of the stated features.

As used herein, the terms “comprise” and “include” and their variants are intended to be non-limiting, such that recitation of items in succession or a list is not to the exclusion of other like items that may also be useful in the devices and methods of this technology. Similarly, the terms “can” and “may” and their variants are intended to be non-limiting, such that recitation that an embodiment can or may comprise certain elements or features does not exclude other embodiments of the present technology that do not contain those elements or features.

The broad teachings of the present disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the specification and the following claims. Reference herein to one aspect, or various aspects means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment or particular system is included in at least one embodiment or aspect. The appearances of the phrase “in one aspect” (or variations thereof) are not necessarily referring to the same aspect or embodiment. It should be also understood that the various method steps discussed herein do not have to be carried out in the same order as depicted, and not each method step is required in each aspect or embodiment.

The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations should not be regarded as a departure from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.

Gunugunuri, Krishna, Peck, Torin C., Roberts, Charles Alexander

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4018710, Aug 27 1973 Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. Reduction catalysts and processes for reduction of nitrogen oxides
4504598, May 12 1983 Nippon Shokubai Kagaku Kogyo Co., Ltd. Process for producing honeycomb catalyst for exhaust gas conversion
5073532, Feb 03 1988 UMICORE AG & CO KG Catalyst for purifying exhaust gases from internal combustion engines and method of making the catalyst
5179059, Feb 09 1990 UMICORE AG & CO KG Catalyst for purifying the exhaust gases of internal combustion engines and method for making the catalyst
5286699, Dec 09 1988 Nippon Shokubai Kagaku Kogyo Co., Ltd. Exhaust gas purifying catalyst suppressing the generation of hydrogen sulfide and method of making the catalyst
5492878, Mar 31 1992 Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd. Catalyst for cleaning exhaust gas with alumina, ceria, zirconia, nickel oxide, alkaline earth oxide, and noble metal catalyst, and method for preparing
6180075, Apr 09 1997 UMICORE AG & CO KG Exhaust gas catalyst
7175822, Jul 30 2001 Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus; Isuzu Motors Limited Method for catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides
20160296915,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
May 23 2017GUNUGUNURI, KRISHNA TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0426250263 pdf
May 23 2017ROBERTS, CHARLES ALEXANDERTOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0426250263 pdf
May 24 2017PECK, TORIN C TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0426250263 pdf
May 25 2017Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Sep 11 2018TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INCToyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0469520113 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Feb 23 2022M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Sep 11 20214 years fee payment window open
Mar 11 20226 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 11 2022patent expiry (for year 4)
Sep 11 20242 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Sep 11 20258 years fee payment window open
Mar 11 20266 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 11 2026patent expiry (for year 8)
Sep 11 20282 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Sep 11 202912 years fee payment window open
Mar 11 20306 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 11 2030patent expiry (for year 12)
Sep 11 20322 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)