Provided are apparatus and systems for performing a swing adsorption process. This swing adsorption process may involve passing streams through adsorbent bed units to remove contaminants, such as water, from the stream. As part of the process, the adsorbent bed unit is purged with a purge stream that is provided at a temperature less than 450° F. The de-contaminated stream may be used with a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant or other subsequent process requiring a de-contaminated stream. The swing adsorption process may involve a combined TSA and PSA process, which is utilized to remove contaminants from the feed stream.
|
17. A system for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream, the system comprising:
an adsorbent bed unit configured to separate contaminants from a gaseous feed stream and to output a product stream, wherein the gaseous feed stream is provided at a feed temperature;
a liquefied natural gas process unit configured to receive the product stream and separate the product stream into a final product stream and a flash fuel stream of high purity methane; and
one or more purge units configured to provide a purge stream to the adsorbent bed unit, wherein the purge stream is provided from one of a portion of the product stream, the flash fuel stream of high purity methane, and any combination thereof; and wherein the purge stream is provided at a temperature at least 50° F. above the feed temperature and less than 450° F. and the purge stream contains equal to or less than 20 molar % of hydrocarbons in the gaseous feed stream;
further comprising:
a first heat exchanger configured to receive the gaseous feed stream; to lower the temperature of the gaseous feed stream; and to conduct away a portion of h2O from the gaseous feed stream; and
a second heat exchanger to increase the temperature of the gaseous feed stream from the first heat exchanger.
1. A process for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream, the process comprising:
a) performing one or more adsorption steps; wherein each of the one or more adsorption steps comprises passing a gaseous feed stream at a feed pressure and a feed temperature through an adsorbent bed unit to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream;
b) performing one or more depressurization steps, wherein the pressure of the adsorbent bed unit is reduced by a predetermined amount with each successive depressurization step;
c) performing one or more purge steps, wherein each of the one or more purge steps comprise passing a purge stream into the adsorbent bed unit, wherein the purge stream flows countercurrent to the direction of the feed stream, the purge stream is provided at a temperature at least 50° F. above the feed temperature and less than 450° F. and the purge stream flow rate is equal to or less than 20 molar % of the feed stream flow rate;
d) performing one or more re-pressurization steps, wherein the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit is increased with each re-pressurization step by a predetermined amount with each successive re-pressurization step; and
e) repeating the steps a) to d) for at least one additional cycle, wherein the cycle duration is for a period greater than 1 second and less than 600 seconds.
2. The process of
3. The process of
4. The process of
5. The process of
6. The process of
7. The process of
8. The process of
9. The process of
passing the gaseous feed stream through a first heat exchanger to lower the temperature of the gaseous feed stream;
conducting away a portion of the h2O from the gaseous feed stream; and
passing the gaseous feed stream to a second heat exchanger to increase the temperature of the gaseous feed stream.
10. The process of
passing the product stream from the adsorbent bed unit to a liquefied natural gas process unit; and
separating a flash fuel stream of high purity methane from the LNG process unit to be utilized as at least a portion of the purge stream.
11. The process of
12. The process of
13. The process of
14. The process of
15. The process of
16. The process of
18. The system
19. The system of
20. The system of
21. The system of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/213,262 filed Sep. 2, 2015, entitled “Apparatus and System for Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Additionally, it is noted that this application is related to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/213,267 filed Sep. 2, 2015, entitled “Apparatus and System for Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto;” U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/213,270 filed Sep. 2, 2015, entitled “Apparatus and System for Combined Temperature and Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/213,273 filed Sep. 2, 2015, entitled “Apparatus and System for Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto.”
The present techniques relate to a system associated with an enhanced swing adsorption process. In particular, the system relates to a swing adsorption process for the removing contaminants from a feed stream, such as dehydration of natural gas, utilizing rapidly cycled adsorbent beds. This system may be used for dehydrating a feed stream to satisfy liquefied natural gas (LNG) specifications for LNG plants and/or specifications for other plants.
Gas separation is useful in many industries and can typically be accomplished by flowing a mixture of gases over an adsorbent material that preferentially adsorbs one or more gas components, while not adsorbing one or more other gas components. The non-adsorbed components are recovered as a separate product.
One particular type of gas separation technology is swing adsorption, such as temperature swing adsorption (TSA), pressure swing adsorption (PSA), partial pressure swing adsorption (PPSA), rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption (RCPSA), rapid cycle partial pressure swing adsorption (RCPPSA), and not limited to, but also combinations of the fore mentioned processes, such as pressure and temperature swing adsorption. As an example, PSA processes rely on the phenomenon of gases being more readily adsorbed within the pore structure or free volume of an adsorbent material when the gas is under pressure. That is, the higher the gas pressure, the greater the amount of readily-adsorbed gas adsorbed. When the pressure is reduced, the adsorbed component is released, or desorbed from the adsorbent material.
The swing adsorption processes (e.g., PSA and/or TSA) may be used to separate gases of a gas mixture because different gases tend to fill the micropore of the adsorbent material to different extents. For example, if a gas mixture, such as natural gas, is passed under pressure through a vessel containing an adsorbent material that is more selective towards carbon dioxide than it is for methane, at least a portion of the carbon dioxide is selectively adsorbed by the adsorbent material, and the gas exiting the vessel is enriched in methane. When the adsorbent material reaches the end of its capacity to adsorb carbon dioxide, it is regenerated by reducing the pressure, thereby releasing the adsorbed carbon dioxide. The adsorbent material is then typically purged and repressurized. Then, the adsorbent material is ready for another adsorption cycle.
The swing adsorption processes typically involve adsorbent bed units, which include adsorbent beds disposed within a housing configured with maintain fluids at various pressures for different steps in an adsorption cycle within the unit. These adsorbent bed units utilize different packing material in the bed structures. For example, the adsorbent bed units utilize checker brick, pebble beds or other available packing. As an enhancement, some adsorbent bed units may utilize engineered packing within the bed structure. The engineered packing may include a material provided in a specific configuration, such as a honeycomb, ceramic forms or the like.
Further, various adsorbent bed units may be coupled together with conduits and valves to manage the flow of fluids. Orchestrating these adsorbent bed units involves coordinating the cycles for each of the adsorbent bed units with other adsorbent bed units in the system. A complete cycle can vary from seconds to minutes as it transfers a plurality of gaseous streams through one or more of the adsorbent bed units.
Unfortunately, conventional processes for dehydration of natural gas streams are typically performed using large molecular sieve adsorbent beds, wherein the thermal swing cycle is hours long. This conventional process requires large and expensive high pressure adsorbent beds, a large inventory of adsorbent material, and involves large footprints and weights, capital investment and fuel usage for gas furnaces. Indeed, in these processes, the adsorption front progresses through the majority of the adsorbent bed's length, and desorption is accomplished using dry gas heated to over 500° F. (Fahrenheit) (260° C. (Celsius), which is heated with a fired furnace. The conventional TSA molecular sieve process uses high temperature purge gas (e.g., at or even above 500° F. (260° C.)) to completely dehydrate the adsorbent beds during each cycle. High temperature purge gas is used in conventional TSA molecular sieve process to minimize the volume of regeneration gas required. This process is driven by economic and expenditure considerations, because handling the regeneration gas volumes (e.g., via recycle compression or some other method) is more costly than simply heating the regeneration gas to a higher temperature. Thus, the regeneration gas temperature is limited to around 500° F. (260° C.) to avoid molecular sieve degradation. Yet, even limiting the regeneration gas to 500° F. (260° C.), the high temperature purge gas results in problems, such as hydrothermal degradation of the adsorbent particles and coke formation within the adsorbent bed leading to deactivation and associated downtime. Additionally, the use of a fired furnace in a natural gas plant is a safety concern that involves additional safety measures to manage.
In addition, for floating operations, the size and weight of conventional TSA molecular sieve process are problematic for stability and buoyance considerations. In particular, the excessive weight and footprint for conventional systems add to the complexity of the floating facility and increase the size of the facilities. Additionally, the floating facilities may be remotely located and may be difficult to access and resupply the equipment and fuel. Also, the additional size and complexity increase the capital investment costs along with the operating costs for the floating facilities. In addition, as noted above, the use of a fired furnace is further complicated by the limited space available.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the industry for apparatus, methods, and systems that provided an enhancements to the processing of streams to remove contaminants, such as processing the natural gas streams prior to liquefaction into an LNG feed stream. The present techniques provide a reduction in cost, size, and weight of facilities for natural gas dehydration prior to liquefaction. Further, a need remains for a dehydration process that does not use purge gases heated to over 500° F. (260° C.) and does not use fire heaters.
In one or more embodiments, the present techniques include a process for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream. The process comprising: a) performing one or more adsorption steps; wherein each of the one or more adsorption steps comprises passing a gaseous feed stream at a feed pressure and a feed temperature through an adsorbent bed unit to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream; b) performing one or more depressurization steps, wherein the pressure of the adsorbent bed unit is reduced by a predetermined amount with each successive depressurization step; c) performing one or more purge steps, wherein each of the one or more purge steps comprise passing a purge stream into the adsorbent bed unit, wherein the purge stream flows countercurrent to the direction of the feed stream, the purge stream is provided at a temperature at least 50° F. (27.8° C.) above the feed temperature (or at least 100° F. (55.6° C.) above the feed temperature) and less than 450° F. (232.2° C.) and the purge stream flow rate is equal to or less than 20 molar percent (%) of the feed stream flow rate (e.g., the purge stream may contain equal to or less than 20 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream or preferably equal to or less than 10 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream); d) performing one or more re-pressurization steps, wherein the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit is increased with each re-pressurization step by a predetermined amount with each successive re-pressurization step; and e) repeating the steps a) to d) for at least one additional cycle, wherein the cycle duration is for a period greater than 1 second and less than 600 seconds, preferably period greater than 2 second and less than 300 seconds or preferably period greater than 1 second and less than 90 seconds. The purge stream may be provided in a range between 200° F. (93.3° C.) and 450° F. (232.2° C.) or in a range between 250° F. (121.1° C.) and 380° F. (193.3° C.).
In another embodiment, a system for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream is described. The system comprises: an adsorbent bed unit, a liquefied natural gas process unit and one or more purge unit. The adsorbent bed unit is configured to separate contaminants from a gaseous feed stream and to output a product stream, wherein the gaseous feed stream is provided at a feed temperature. The liquefied natural gas process unit is configured to receive the product stream and separate the product stream into a final product stream and a flash fuel stream. One or more purge units is configured to provide a purge stream to the adsorbent bed unit, wherein the purge stream is provided from one of a portion of the product stream, the flash fuel stream, a boil off gas stream and any combination thereof; and wherein the purge stream is provided at a temperature at least 50° F. (27.8° C.) above the feed temperature and less than 450° F. (232.2° C.) and the purge stream contains equal to or less than 20 molar % of the hydrocarbons in the gaseous feed stream. The purge stream may be passed through the adsorbent bed unit at a temperature at least 100° F. (55.6° C.) above the feed temperature) and the purge stream may contain equal to or less than 20 molar % of the methane in the feed stream or preferably equal to or less than 10 molar % of the methane in the feed stream. The one or more purge units may comprise one or more compressors configured to compress one of the flash fuel stream, a boil off gas stream and any combination thereof.
The foregoing and other advantages of the present disclosure may become apparent upon reviewing the following detailed description and drawings of non-limiting examples of embodiments.
Unless otherwise explained, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. The singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, the word “or” is intended to include “and” unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “includes” means “comprises.” All patents and publications mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety, unless otherwise indicated. In case of conflict as to the meaning of a term or phrase, the present specification, including explanations of terms, control. Directional terms, such as “upper,” “lower,” “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “vertical,” and “horizontal,” are used herein to express and clarify the relationship between various elements. It should be understood that such terms do not denote absolute orientation (e.g., a “vertical” component can become horizontal by rotating the device). The materials, methods, and examples recited herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
As used herein, “stream” refers to fluid (e.g., solids, liquid and/or gas) being conducted through various equipment. The equipment may include conduits, vessels, manifolds, units or other suitable devices.
As used herein, volume percent is based on standard conditions. The standard conditions are normalized to the temperature of 0° C. (e.g., 32° F.) and absolute pressure of 100 kiloPascals (kPa) (1 bar).
As used herein, “conduit” refers to a tubular member forming a channel through which something is conveyed. The conduit may include one or more of a pipe, a manifold, a tube or the like.
The present techniques relate to a swing adsorption process (e.g., a rapid cycle process) for the dehydration of a feed stream (e.g., natural gas) utilizing rapidly cycled adsorbent beds. The process may involve adsorbent beds that are partially depressurized and heated by a counter-current gas flow of moderately hot dry product gas to thermally assisted partial pressure purge desorption (e.g., a purge stream). In contrast to conventional approaches, the present techniques utilize lower temperature purge streams, which may not completely dehydrate the adsorbent bed. As a result, the temperature in the purge stream may be generated by other means than gas furnaces, such as solely by compression. The lower temperatures in the purge stream may be utilized to provide cost and safety benefits, along with operational enhancements. For example, the lower temperate may lessen hydrothermal degradation of the adsorbent and lessen coke formation. Further, the present techniques may be less expensive compared to conventional TSA molecular sieve systems and have a smaller footprint by using adsorbent beds rather than conventional TSA molecular sieve dehydration.
As one enhancement, the present techniques use a purge stream having lower temperatures (e.g., less than 450° F. (232.2° C.)) than conventional approaches. The purge stream may be less than 450° F. (232.2° C.) and preferably less than 360° F. (182.2° C.). For example, the temperature in the purge stream may range between a temperature approximately 50° F. (27.8° C.) above the feed temperature and 450° F. (232.2° C.), may range between a temperature approximately 100° F. (55.6° C.) above the feed temperature and 450° F. (232.2° C.), may range between 200° F. (93.3° C.) and 450° F. (232.2° C.), may range between 250° F. (121.1° C.) and 380° F. (193.3° C.), and/or may range between 280° F. (137.8° C.) and 360° F. (182.2° C.). The purge stream may also be a dry purge gas, which is used to heat the adsorbent bed during desorption. The lower temperature may lessen the hydrothermal degradation of the adsorbent materials and may lessen the formation of coke. Further, the lower temperature purge stream may be generated from the use of compression, which may be only source of the heat for this purge gas. In some embodiments, the lower temperature purge gas may be heated solely by compression, thus eliminating a fired heater and thus reducing capital investment and enhancing safety.
Also, the present techniques may also include various pressures for the feed stream and the purge stream. For example, the feed pressure of the feed stream may be based on the preferred adsorption feed pressure, which may be in the range from 400 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) to 1,400 psia, in the range from 600 psia to 1,200 psia. Also, the purge pressure of the purge stream may be based on the preferred adsorbent purge pressure, which may be in the range from 200 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) to 800 psia, in the range from 400 psia to 600 psia.
Further, another enhancement is that the purge stream contains a portion of the feed stream. By way of example, the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or less than 20 molar percent (%) of the feed stream flow rate; the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or less than 15 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; or the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or less than 10 molar % of the feed stream flow rate. Further, the purge stream flow rate may be greater than or equal to 1 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; the purge stream flow rate may greater than or equal to 3 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; or the purge stream flow rate may be greater than or equal to 5 molar % of the feed stream flow rate. As another example, the purge stream may contain equal to or less than 20 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or less than 10 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream. Further, the purge stream may contain equal to or greater than 1 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream; preferably equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream, or preferably equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream. As a specific example, the purge stream, which includes a portion of the methane from the feed stream, may include equal to or less than 20 molar % of the methane in the feed stream, equal to or less than 15 molar % of the methane in the feed stream, equal to or less than 10 molar % of the methane in the feed stream, or equal to or less than 7 molar % of the methane in the feed stream.
Further, the purge stream may include a portion of the feed stream. By way of example, the portion of the methane in the purge stream may be equal to or greater than 1 molar % of the methane in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the methane in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the methane in the feed stream. Also, the portion of the hydrocarbons in the purge stream may be equal to or greater than 1 molar % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream. As yet another example, the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or greater than 1 molar percent (%) of the feed stream flow rate; the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; or the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the feed stream flow rate.
As another enhancement, the present techniques may provide dehydration through the use of a rapid cycle swing adsorption process, such as a TSA process. While the swing capacity per mass of the adsorbent bed may be less than conventional TSA molecular sieve dehydration, without the requirement for complete drying of the adsorbent bed (e.g., directionally making the quantity of adsorbent per feed volume required larger), the use of rapid cycles may lessen the adsorbent quantity as compared to conventional TSA molecular sieve dehydration in that the required adsorbent quantity is ten to more than one hundred times smaller than conventional TSA molecular sieve dehydration, which depends on the specific configuration. Also, lower temperatures of adsorbent bed heating may be utilized without the required complete drying of the adsorbent bed. Accordingly, the lower temperature of the purge stream in the purge step of the present techniques may be heated by compression only, lessening or eliminating costly heat exchangers or fired heaters. Additionally, the present techniques may combine thermal swing adsorption with a pressure swing adsorption to further enhance the process.
In the present techniques, the product end of the adsorbent bed is maintained nearly dry (e.g., the water loading for the region near the product end is less than 1 mole per kilogram (mol/kg), is less than 0.5 mol/kg, or is less than 0.1 mol/kg), but it may not need to be fully dry the feed end of the adsorbent bed. The feed end or feed side is the end of the adsorbent bed that the feed stream initially enters, while the product end is the portion of the adsorbent bed opposite from the feed end and where the feed stream exits the adsorbent bed. The loading level of water may be lower on the feed side of the adsorbent bed during the purge step, but the length of adsorbent bed that contains water is reduced during the purge step. For example, an adsorbate loaded region may be a specific portion of the adsorbent bed from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to 10% of the bed length, from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to 40% of the bed length or from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to 75% of the bed length. The product region may be a specific portion of the adsorbent bed from the product end of the adsorbent bed to 10% of the bed length, from the product end of the adsorbent bed to 25% of the bed length or from the product end of the adsorbent bed to 40% of the bed length. Utilizing only a portion of the bed length ensures that the product end of the adsorbent bed remains rigorously dry and provides extremely low product water concentrations. Further, maintaining a significant portion of the product end of the adsorbent bed dry provides flexibility for non-uniformity of gas passage channels in embodiments where a structured adsorbent, such as a monolith, is used for the adsorber structure or adsorbent bed. The movement of the wet front back during purge step and forward during the adsorption step is the basis of the swing capacity of the process. In part, this is achieved by using a limited, cost effective quantity of purge gas in the purge steam in this process and configuration.
In addition, the present techniques may be integrated into various configurations to provide additional functionality. For example, the present techniques may be utilized, but not limited, for dehydration of a stream prior to and integrated with a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant, which may involve removing contaminants to LNG specifications. Other integrations may include cryogenic natural gas liquefaction recovery plant, control freeze zone plants or other such plants. Regardless, the present techniques may be used to treat gases containing higher or lower amounts of water and for CO2 levels as high as about 500 parts per million molar (ppm) to LNG specifications. The present techniques may also be used to remove contaminants to other specifications, such as cryogenic natural gas liquefaction specifications for a cryogenic natural gas liquefaction recovery plant or the like. The process of partially heating the adsorbent bed utilizing a thermal wave during a purge step coupled with rapid cycles provides enhancements, such as economical enhancements, to other thermal swing adsorption separations known to those skilled in the art.
Beneficially, the present techniques provide various advantages. For example, the present techniques provide a modular design and may be configured to lessen the footprint, weight, and capital expense of processes to treat dehydration of feed streams (e.g., natural gas) utilizing rapidly cycled adsorbent beds. The present techniques may be used for liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants and the other suitable plants. Also, as this process does not involve the use any fired furnaces, the present techniques may eliminate the use of fired furnaces or high temperature heat exchanger from the process. The removal of such equipment is inherently safer due to the elimination of the flames along with the associated equipment and may lower fuel consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to lack of combustion in a furnace. Further, the present techniques may increase flexibility regarding the selection of adsorbent material used in the process, may reduce dust formation due to monolithic adsorbent bed design, may lessen solid waste production due to lower adsorbent quantities and/or may lessen adsorption of heavy hydrocarbons (e.g., C2+) due to low adsorbent quantities. The present techniques may also lower impact on downstream process equipment when switching adsorbent beds due to the modular configuration of the rapid cycle TSA equipment providing some of the adsorbent beds to be replaced or regenerated off-line, while the remainder of the adsorbent bed units continue to provide dry product to the downstream equipment (e.g., LNG or cryogenic separation plant).
In one or more embodiments, the swing adsorption system may include one or more purge units in fluid communication with a liquefied natural gas process unit. The purge units may be configured to provide a purge stream to each of the adsorbent bed units, wherein the purge stream is provided from one of a portion of the product stream, the flash fuel stream, a boil off gas stream and any combination thereof. By way of example, the purge units may be or include one or more compressors configured to compress one of the flash fuel stream, a boil off gas stream and any combination thereof. Also, the purge units may be or include one or more pressure reduction devices (e.g., expanders or valve) configured to decompress the portion of the product stream. The portion of the product stream may be from any one of the adsorbent bed units within the swing adsorption system.
Also, in one or more embodiments, the present techniques can be used for any type of swing adsorption process. Non-limiting swing adsorption processes for which the present techniques may include pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum pressure swing adsorption (VPSA), temperature swing adsorption (TSA), partial pressure swing adsorption (PPSA), rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption (RCPSA), rapid cycle thermal swing adsorption (RCTSA), rapid cycle partial pressure swing adsorption (RCPPSA), as well as combinations of these processes, such as pressure/temperature swing adsorption. Exemplary kinetic swing adsorption processes are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2008/0282892, 2008/0282887, 2008/0282886, 2008/0282885, 2008/0282884 and 2014/0013955, which are each herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Adsorptive separation processes, apparatus, and systems, as described above, are useful for development and production of hydrocarbons, such as gas and oil processing. Particularly, the provided processes, apparatus, and systems are useful for the rapid, large scale, efficient separation of a variety of target gases from gas mixtures. In particular, the processes, apparatus, and systems may be used to prepare feed products (e.g., natural gas products) by removing contaminants (e.g., CO2, H2O and heavy hydrocarbons (i.e. hydrocarbons having at least two carbon atoms)). The provided processes, apparatus, and systems are useful for preparing gaseous feed streams for use in utilities, including separation applications. The separation applications may include dew point control; sweetening and/or detoxification; corrosion protection and/or control; dehydration; heating value; conditioning; and/or purification. Examples of utilities that utilize one or more separation applications include generation of fuel gas; seal gas; non-potable water; blanket gas; instrument and control gas; refrigerant; inert gas; and/or hydrocarbon recovery.
In certain embodiments, the present techniques may be used to remove contaminants feed streams, such as acid gas from hydrocarbon streams. Acid gas removal technology may be useful for gas reserves exhibit higher concentrations of acid gas (e.g., sour gas resources). Hydrocarbon feed streams vary widely in amount of acid gas, such as from several parts per million acid gas to 90 volume percent (vol. %) acid gas. Non-limiting examples of acid gas concentrations from exemplary gas reserves include concentrations of at least: (a) 1 vol. % H2S, 5 vol. % CO2, (b) 1 vol. % H2S, 15 vol. % CO2, (c) 1 vol. % H2S, 60 vol. % CO2, (d) 15 vol. % H2S, 15 vol. % CO2, and (e) 15 vol. % H2S, 30 vol. % CO2. Accordingly, the present techniques may include equipment to remove various contaminants, such as H2S and CO2 to desired levels. In particular, the H2S may be lowered to levels less than 4 ppm, while the CO2 may be lowered to levels less than 100 ppm or less than 50 ppm.
In other embodiments, the present techniques may be used to lessen the water content of the stream to a specific level by the swing adsorption process. For example, the water content of a feed stream may range from a few ppm to saturation levels in the stream. In particular, the water content may range from a few hundred ppm to saturation levels, such as 100 ppm to 1,500 ppm dependent on the feed pressure or 500 ppm to 1,500 ppm dependent on the feed pressure. The specific water level of the product stream from the swing adsorption process may be related to dew point of desired output product (e.g., the dew point from the water content should be lower than the lowest temperature of the stream in a subsequent process, such as liquefaction and is related to the feed pressure and feed composition). For LNG applications, the water content may be less than 0.1 ppm, as the dew point may be −260° F. (−162.2° C.). For cryogenic Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) recovery applications, the water content may be less than 1 ppm, as the dew point may be about −150° F. (−101.1° C.). For controlled freeze zone (CFZ) applications, the water content may be less than 10 ppm, as the dew point may be about −60° F. (51.1° C.). The water content of the product stream may be less than (<) 0.1 parts per million volume (ppmv); <10 ppmv, <1 ppmv or <0.1 ppmv. By way of example, the gaseous feed stream may include hydrocarbons and H2O, wherein the H2O is in the range of 0.2 parts per million volume to saturation levels in the gaseous feed stream or the H2O may be in the range of 100 ppmv to 1500 ppmv.
In certain embodiments, the gaseous feed stream entering the swing adsorption process or one of the adsorbent bed units may be conditioned to address problems with the pressure drop from passing through the poppet valves. This pressure drop from the poppet valves may result in a liquid drop out within the adsorbent bed. To avoid the liquid drop out, the gaseous feed stream may be heated to lessen or eliminate the liquid dropout. By way of example, the gaseous feed stream may be passed through a heater or heat exchanger to increase the temperature of the gaseous feed stream to lessen or eliminate liquid dropout. The gaseous feed stream may have the temperature increased by at least 2° F. (1.1° C.), at least 5° F. (2.8° C.) or at least 20° F. (11.1° C.).
Further, in one or more embodiments, the present techniques may include a specific process flow to remove contaminants, such as water. For example, the process may include an adsorbent step and a regeneration step, which form the cycle. The adsorbent step may include passing a gaseous feed stream at a feed pressure and a feed temperature through an adsorbent bed unit to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream. The feed stream may be passed through the adsorbent bed in a forward direction (e.g., from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to the product end of the adsorbent bed). Then, the flow of the gaseous feed stream may be interrupted for a regeneration step. The regeneration step may include one or more depressurization steps, a purge step and one or more re-pressurization steps. The depressurization steps may include reducing the pressure of the adsorbent bed unit by a predetermined amount for each successive depressurization step, which may be a single step and/or multiple steps and may be one or more blowdown steps. The depressurization step may be provided in a forward direction or may preferably be provided in a countercurrent direction (e.g., from the product end of the adsorbent bed to the feed end of the adsorbent bed). The purge step may include passing a purge stream into the adsorbent bed unit, which may be a once through purge step and the purge stream may be provided in countercurrent flow relative to the feed stream.
The purge stream may be provided in the temperature ranges, flow rates and have compositions, as noted above. For example, the purge stream, which may include a portion of the methane in the feed stream, may include equal to or less than 20 molar % of the methane in the feed stream; or equal to or less than 10 molar % of the methane in the feed stream. Also, the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or less than 20 molar percent (%) of the feed stream flow rate; the purge stream flow rate is equal to or less than 15 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; or the purge stream flow rate is equal to or less than 10 molar % of the feed stream flow rate. Further, the purge stream flow rate may be greater than or equal to 1 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; the purge stream flow rate may greater than or equal to 3 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; or the purge stream flow rate is greater than or equal to 5 molar % of the feed stream flow rate. As another example, the purge stream may contain equal to or less than 20 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or less than 10 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream. Further, the purge stream may contain equal to or greater than 1 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream; preferably equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream, or preferably equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream. As a specific example, the purge stream, which includes a portion of the methane from the feed stream, may include equal to or less than 20 molar % of the methane in the feed stream, equal to or less than 15 molar % of the methane in the feed stream, equal to or less than 10 molar % of the methane in the feed stream, or equal to or less than 7 molar % of the methane in the feed stream. The portion of the methane in the purge stream may be equal to or greater than 1 molar % of the methane in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the methane in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the methane in the feed stream.
The output stream from the purge step may be conducted away for fuel in other equipment, such as the LNG plant. Then, the one or more re-pressurization steps may be performed, wherein the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit is increased with each re-pressurization step by a predetermined amount with each successive re-pressurization step. Then, the cycle may be repeated for additional streams. The cycle duration may be for a period greater than 1 second and less than 600 seconds, for a period greater than 2 second and less than 300 seconds, for a period greater than 2 seconds and less than 200 seconds, for a period greater than 1 second or 2 seconds and less than 90 seconds, or for a period greater than 2 seconds and less than 60 seconds. The present techniques may be further understood with reference to the
In this system, the adsorbent bed units, such as adsorbent bed unit 102, may be configured for a cyclical swing adsorption process for removing contaminants from feed streams (e.g., fluids, gaseous or liquids). For example, the adsorbent bed unit 102 may include various conduits (e.g., conduit 104) for managing the flow of fluids through, to or from the adsorbent bed within the adsorbent bed unit 102. These conduits from the adsorbent bed units 102 may be coupled to a manifold (e.g., manifold 106) to distribute the flow of the stream to, from or between components. The adsorbent bed within an adsorbent bed unit may separate one or more contaminants from the feed stream to form a product stream. As may be appreciated, the adsorbent bed units may include other conduits to control other fluid steams as part of the process, such as purge streams, depressurizations streams, and the like. Further, the adsorbent bed unit may also include one or more equalization vessels, such as equalization vessel 108, which are dedicated to the adsorbent bed unit and may be dedicated to one or more step in the swing adsorption process.
As an example, which is discussed further below in
The adsorbent bed comprises a solid adsorbent material capable of adsorbing one or more components from the feed stream. Such solid adsorbent materials are selected to be durable against the physical and chemical conditions within the adsorbent bed unit 102 and can include metallic, ceramic, or other materials, depending on the adsorption process. Further examples of adsorbent materials are noted further below.
The upper head 218 and lower head 220 contain openings in which valve structures can be inserted, such as valve assemblies 222 to 240, respectively (e.g., poppet valves). The upper or lower open flow path volume between the respective head 218 or 220 and adsorbent bed 210 can also contain distribution lines (not shown) which directly introduce fluids into the adsorbent bed 210. The upper head 218 contains various openings (not show) to provide flow passages through the inlet manifolds 242 and 244 and the outlet manifolds 248, 250 and 252, while the lower head 220 contains various openings (not shown) to provide flow passages through the inlet manifold 254 and the outlet manifolds 256, 258 and 260. Disposed in fluid communication with the respective manifolds 242 to 260 are the valve assemblies 222 to 240. If the valve assemblies 222 to 240 are poppet valves, each may include a disk element connected to a stem element which can be positioned within a bushing or valve guide. The stem element may be connected to an actuating means, such as actuating means (not shown), which is configured to have the respective valve impart linear motion to the respective stem. As may be appreciated, the actuating means may be operated independently for different steps in the process to activate a single valve or a single actuating means may be utilized to control two or more valves. Further, while the openings may be substantially similar in size, the openings and inlet valves for inlet manifolds may have a smaller diameter than those for outlet manifolds, given that the gas volumes passing through the inlets may tend to be lower than product volumes passing through the outlets.
In swing adsorption processes, the cycle involves two or more steps that each has a certain time interval, which are summed together to be the cycle time. These steps include regeneration of the adsorbent bed following the adsorption step using a variety of methods including pressure swing, vacuum swing, temperature swing, purging (via any suitable type of purge fluid for the process), and combinations thereof. As an example, a PSA cycle may include the steps of feed or adsorption, depressurization (e.g., blowdown), purging, and re-pressurization. When performing the separation at high pressure, depressurization and re-pressurization (which may be referred to as equalization) may be performed in multiple steps to reduce the pressure change for each step and enhance efficiency. In some swing adsorption processes, such as rapid cycle swing adsorption processes, a substantial portion of the total cycle time is involved in the regeneration of the adsorbent bed. Accordingly, any reductions in the amount of time for regeneration results in a reduction of the total cycle time or cycle curation. This reduction may also reduce the overall size of the swing adsorption system.
As noted above, conventional systems for dehydration is typically accomplished using TSA and PSA molecular sieve process. The conventional systems involves many hours of operation for the molecular sieve unit to both fill with adsorbed species (e.g., water) and to heat for desorption. As a result, the molecular sieve unit are very large (e.g., are a large footprint and involve more adsorbent than the present techniques). To minimize the regeneration gas volume required and to maximize bed capacity, the adsorbent beds of the molecular sieve unit is dried completely (e.g., below the desired product water activity level), which utilizes a purge gas at about 500° F. (260° C.). In addition, the conventional approaches maintain a narrow mass transfer zone, or sharp adsorption front to maximize bed utilization, while maintaining rigorous dehydration. A schematic of the conventional process integrated into an LNG plant is shown below in
As an example,
The process begins at a contamination removal unit 302, which receives an input stream and separates at least a portion of the mercury, carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from the input stream. The output stream from the contamination removal unit 302 is a feed stream, which is provided via conduit 304 to a heat exchanger 306. The heat exchanger 306 is utilized to adjust the temperature of the feed stream, and may also be configured to remove a portion of the water from the stream. For example, the heat exchanger may lower the temperature of the feed stream, which results in condensation, which is conducted away from the stream. The output from the heat exchanger 306 is provided to a filter 308. The filter 308 is configured to remove both particulate and liquid droplets from the temperature adjusted feed stream. Then, the output from the filter 308 is provided to the molecular sieve unit 310. The molecular sieve unit 310 is configure to separate additional contaminants, such as water from the stream. The dehydrated output from the molecular sieve unit 310 is conveyed to a heat exchanger 312, which adjusts the temperature of the stream before being passed to the LNG process unit 314. The output stream from LNG unit 314 is a final product conveyed to sales, storage and/or shipment.
An additional stream from the LNG unit 314 may be a flash fuel stream used within the process. For example, the addition stream from the LNG unit 314 is a lower pressure high purity methane side stream, which may be provided to the fuel gas compressor unit 318. The additional stream may be referred to as a flash fuel stream, flash gas, flash/fuel gas, or end flash gas. A portion of the compressed fuel output stream from the fuel gas compressor unit 318 is heated in a heating unit 320, which may be a furnace or heat exchanger unit, and is configured to thermally swing the temperature for desorption of the molecular sieve unit 310. This stream is output from molecular sieve unit 310 and passed through a heat exchanger unit 322 to cool (e.g., lower the temperature of the stream) the stream and may also be configured to remove a portion of the water from the stream. This heated stream may be combined with any remaining output of the fuel gas compressor unit 318 in conduit 326 and a boil off gas from conduit 324, if any, to form a fuel stream in conduit 328.
The above configuration involves using fuel gas as the purge stream for the molecular sieve unit 310. Alternatively, the conventional approach may include a temperature swing adsorption process and may be configured to use a dry gas for regeneration and to recycle the wet regeneration gas from a compressor to the feed gas. However, this approach may increase the operation costs and the high regeneration hot gas flow rate (e.g., gas temperature equal to or greater than 500° F. (260° C.)).
As an example, the feed stream may be provided at a flow rate of 750 million standard cubic feet per day (MSCFD), at a temperature of about 86° F. (30° C.) and at a pressure of about 1,175 pounds per square inch absolute (psia). The feed stream may include primarily methane along with other heavier hydrocarbons and contaminants. In particular, the methane (C1) may be about 92 volume percent (vol. %), the other hydrocarbons (C2+) may be about 8 vol. %, the hydrogen sulfide H2S may be about 4 ppm, carbon dioxide may be about CO2 of 50 ppm and the water may be about H2O of 34 pounds per million standard cubic feet (lb/MSCF). The heat exchanger 306 may adjust the temperature of the feed stream from about 86° F. to about 68° F. (20° C.), which may also lessen the water to 19 lb/MSCF. The stream passed from the molecular sieve unit 310, which is conveyed through the heat exchanger 312, to the LNG process unit 314 may have a flow rate of 750 MSCFD, at a temperature of 68° F. (20° C.) and pressure of 1,150 psia. This stream may include less than about 0.1 ppm of water. Then, the output stream from the conduit 316 may be at 5.2 million ton per annum (MTA).
The flash fuel stream provided to the fuel gas compressor unit 318 may be provided at a flow rate of 52 MCSFD, which may be about 7% of the stream volume provided to the LNG process unit 314. From the fuel gas compressor unit 318, the additional fuel stream in conduit 326 may be 27 MSCF (e.g., 4 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314), while the stream passed through the heat exchanger 320 to the molecular sieve unit 310 may be 25 MSCFD (e.g., 3 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314). The stream to the molecular sieve unit 310 may be at a temperature of 550° F. (287.8° C.) and at a pressure of 665 psia. From the molecular sieve unit 310, the stream conveyed to the heat exchanger 322 may be at a flow rate of 25 MSCF (e.g., 3 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314) and at a pressure of 600 psia. Also, the boil off gas stream in conduit 324 may be provided at a flow rate of 19 MSCGD (e.g., 2.5 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314).
As noted in this example, the purge stream from the fuel gas compressor unit 318 is provided at an elevated temperature of 550° F. (287.8° C.). This high temperature purge stream may result in hydrothermal degradation of the adsorbent particles and coke formation within the adsorbent bed leading to deactivation and associated downtime.
Further, in this configuration, the purge stream contains a portion of the feed stream. For example, if the feed quantity is 750 MSCFD to the molecular sieve unit 310, the purge stream is flash gas at 25 MSCFD. As the compositions of all the streams are substantially similar (e.g., without a portion of the water content), the mass of the feed stream used in the purge stream may be estimated to be approximately 3.3% (e.g., 25 MSCFD/750 MSCFD) the mass of the feed to the molecular sieve process. In this calculation, the concentrations of H2S, CO2 and H2O are not considered.
As an enhancement,
Similar to the process in
In this configuration, the flash fuel stream is provided to the fuel gas compressor unit 318. The fuel gas compressor unit 318 compresses the low pressure high purity methane stream to increase the pressure of the resulting stream. Then, the output of fuel gas compressor unit 318 is combined with boil off gas stream provided via conduit 408 to form the purge stream. The purge stream is provided to the adsorbent bed unit 406 as the purge gas in the swing adsorption process. The purge stream combines with contaminants (e.g., water) in the adsorbent bed unit 406 to form the output purge stream. The output purge stream may be conducted away from the adsorbent bed unit 406 toward the heat exchange 415. The heat exchanger 415 is configured to adjust the temperature of the stream and may also be configured to remove a portion of the water from the stream. Then, the conditioned stream is provided as a process fuel gas stream via conduit 416.
This configuration utilizes a purge stream that is at lower temperatures compared to conventional molecular sieve approaches. As an example, the configuration may be utilized to treat 750 MSCFD of wet feed, which involves using four adsorbent bed unit. Each of these adsorbent bed units, which are represented by adsorbent bed unit 406, may have a 0.25 meter (m) diameter and may be 0.6 m in length. In this example, each bed is composed of parallel channels 500 by 500 micron in diameter separated by 50 micron steel walls and coated with a 60 micron layer of porous adsorbent. In this example, the typical heat capacity of the adsorber bed was 3.0 Joules per gram adsorbent per degree Kelvin (J/g adsorbent/K). Each bed contains a total of 22.1 kg of adsorbent for a total of 88.4 kg require for the entire process. In addition, the present techniques do not require a narrow mass transfer zone, thus a wide range of adsorbents can be used for rigorous water removal. These include but are not limited to silica gel, Zeolite 3A, 4A and 5A.
As an example, the feed stream may be provided at 750 MSCFD, at a temperature of about 86° F. and at a pressure of about 1,175 pounds per square inch absolute (psia). The feed stream may include primarily methane along with other hydrocarbons and contaminants. In particular, the methane (C1) may be about 92 vol. %, the other hydrocarbons (C2+) may be about 8 vol. %, the hydrogen sulfide H2S may be about 4 ppm, carbon dioxide may be about CO2 of 50 ppm and the water may be about H2O of 34 pounds per standard cubic feet (lb/MSCF). The heat exchanger 306 may adjust the temperature of the feed stream from about 86° F. (30° C.) to about 68° F. (20° C.), which may also lessen the water to 19 lb/MSCF. The stream is then passed through the second heat exchanger to adjust the temperature to 73° F. (22.8° C.), which is subsequently passed to the filter 404 and adsorbent bed unit 406. Then, the output from the adsorbent bed unit 406 is conveyed through the heat exchanger 312 to the LNG process unit 314. This stream may have a flow rate of 750 MSCFD, at a temperature of 68° F. (20° C.) and at a pressure of 1,150 psia. This stream may include less than about 0.1 ppm of water. Then, the output stream from the conduit 316 may be at 5.2 MTA.
The flash fuel stream provided to the fuel gas compressor unit 318 may be provided at a rate of 50 MCSFD, which may be about 6.7 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314. The output from the fuel gas compressor unit 318 may be combined with the boil off gas (e.g., 11 MSCFD, which is 1.5 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314) and provided to the adsorbent bed unit 406 as the purge stream. The purge stream may be provided at a flow rate of 61 MSCFD (e.g., 3 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314), at a temperature of 336° F. (168.9° C.) and at a pressure of 622 psia. From the adsorbent bed unit 406, the purge output stream is conveyed to the heat exchanger 415 (e.g., purge heat exchanger) and may be at a flow rate of 63 MSCFD (e.g., 8.4 volume % of the stream provided to the LNG process unit 314) at a temperature of about 240° F. (115.6° C.) and at a pressure of 600 psia.
In this configuration, the purge stream contains a portion of the feed stream. For example, if the feed quantity is 750 MSCFD to the adsorbent bed unit 406, the purge stream is a combination of flash gas at 50 MSCFD and boil off gas at 11 MSCFD. As the compositions of all the streams are substantially similar (e.g., without a portion of the water content), the mass of the feed stream used in the purge stream may be estimated to be approximately 8.1% (e.g., 61 MSCFD/750 MSCFD) the mass of the feed to the swing adsorption process. In this calculation, the concentrations of H2S, CO2 and H2O are not considered.
By way of example, the purge stream may include equal to or less than 20 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream, equal to or less than 15 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream, equal to or less than 10 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream, or equal to or less than 7 molar % of the hydrocarbons, such as methane, in the feed stream. In other examples, the purge stream may include equal to or less than 20 volume % of the feed stream, equal to or less than 15 volume % of the feed stream, equal to or less than 10 volume % of the feed stream, or equal to or less than 7 volume % of the feed stream. In other configurations, the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or less than 20 molar percent (%) of the feed stream flow rate; the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or less than 15 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; or the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or less than 10 molar % of the feed stream flow rate.
Further, the purge stream may include a portion of the feed stream. By way of example, the portion of the methane in the purge stream may be equal to or greater than 1 molar % of the methane in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the methane in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the methane in the feed stream. Also, the portion of the hydrocarbons in the purge stream may be equal to or greater than 1 molar % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream; or preferably equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream. As yet another example, the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or greater than 1 molar percent (%) of the feed stream flow rate; the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or greater than 3 molar % of the feed stream flow rate; or the purge stream flow rate may be equal to or greater than 5 molar % of the feed stream flow rate.
In this diagram 400, the rapid cycle adsorbent beds are regenerated via a purge step with a purge stream, which is heated only by compression. This configuration may remove any heat exchanger or furnace from the purge stream process flow. Further, in this configuration, the purge stream is provided by a combination of the compressed flash fuel stream (e.g., LNG flash gas) and the boil-off gas (BOG) in conduit 408 from the LNG storage tanks (not shown). As the purge stream is at a lower temperature, it may involve less heat than the regeneration stream in the conventional process of
In another embodiment, the filter 404 may be disposed between the two heat exchangers 306 and 402, downstream of the chiller heat exchanger 306, but upstream of the superheater heat exchanger 402. This configuration may lessen the possibility of liquid droplet carryover into the superheater heat exchanger 402. The purpose of the superheater heat exchanger 402 is to adjust the feed being provided to the adsorbent beds, such that it has less than (<) 100% relative humidity and the carryover of water droplets into the superheat heat exchanger 402 may hinder this purpose.
The enhancements of the present techniques are further illustrated by comparing the two processes. For example, to perform the same dehydration of a feed stream. The process in the conventional TSA molecular sieve process, as noted in
In diagrams 520 and 540 the water concentration of the bed gas compositions are shown relative to the bed length. The response on these diagrams 520 and 540 are the water concentration in the gas phase and do not include the amount of water adsorbed in the solid adsorbent. In particular, the diagram 520 is an expanded view of the purge step performed in diagram 500. In this diagram 520, the responses 522, 524, 526 and 528 are shown along a water concentration axis 530 in ppm and a bed length axis 532 in normalized position along the bed length (e.g., normalized bed length (z/L)). The flow of the stream for the purge step is along the arrow 534. The response 522 represents eight seconds into the cycle, the response 524 represents twelve seconds into the cycle, the response 526 represents sixteen seconds into the cycle and the response 528 represents twenty seconds into the cycle. These responses shows the progression of the water removal from the bed during the purge step. Further, the diagram 540 is an expanded view of the adsorption step performed in diagram 500. In this diagram 540, the responses 542, 544, 546 and 548 are shown along a water concentration axis 550 in ppm and a bed length axis 552 in normalized bed length z/L. The flow of the stream for the purge step is along the arrow 554. The response 542 represents twenty-four eight seconds into the cycle, the response 544 represents thirty-two seconds into the cycle, the response 546 represents forty seconds into the cycle and the response 548 represents forty-eight seconds into the cycle. Further, the diagram 540 represents that on average only about 80% of the available bed length is utilized for adsorption.
In diagram 620, the water loading responses 622, 624, 626 and 628 are shown along water loading axis 630 in mol/kg with respect to the bed length axis 632 in z/L. The response 622 represents eight seconds, the response 624 represents twelve seconds, the response 626 represents sixteen seconds and the response 628 represents twenty seconds and shows the progression of the water loading from the adsorbent bed during the purge step. As shown on this diagram 620, the water loading decreases as the purge step continues from the initial time of eight seconds (e.g., response 622) to the end of the purge step at time of twenty seconds (e.g., response 628). For the duration of this purge step, the water loading for the product region, as defined in
In this configuration, purge step removes water from the adsorbent bed. For example, the highest content of water is at the end of the adsorption step (e.g., response 608), while the lowest content of water is at the end of the purge step (e.g., response 628). As such, the concentration of water adsorbed on the feed end of the adsorbent bed is the difference between the response 608 at the feed end of the adsorbent bed and the response 628 at the feed end of the adsorbent bed divided by the response 608, which is about 40% (e.g., (15 mol/kg−9 mol/kg) divided by 15 mol/kg). Accordingly, the concentration of water at the feed end of the adsorbent bed adsorbed on the adsorbent bed may be at least 40% of the concentration of water adsorbed on the feed end of the adsorbent bed at the end of the duration of adsorption step; may be at least 30% of the concentration of water adsorbed on the feed end of the adsorbent bed at the end of the duration of adsorption step or may be at least 20% of the concentration of water adsorbed on the feed end of the adsorbent bed at the end of the duration of adsorption step.
In diagram 640, the water loading response 642, 644, 646 and 648 are shown along the temperature axis 650 in ° F. with respect to the bed length axis 652 in z/L. The response 642 represents eight seconds into the cycle, the response 644 represents twelve seconds into the cycle, the response 646 represents sixteen seconds into the cycle and the response 648 represents twenty seconds into the cycle. These responses show the progression of the temperature of the adsorbent bed during the purge step. As shown on this diagram 640, the temperature of the adsorbent bed increases as the purge step continues from the initial time of eight seconds (e.g., response 642) to the end of the purge step at time of twenty seconds (e.g., response 648).
Further, in another example, the configuration may include an integration with a Controlled Freeze Zone™ (CFZ) process for bulk CO2 removal from natural gas. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2009/0266107 and 2010/0018248. The cryogenic controlled freeze zone is a cryogenic distillation process that separates methane from gas streams containing large amounts of CO2. The system includes a refluxed demethanizer with a freeze zone in the middle to facilitate freezing and re-melting of the CO2, as is known by one skilled in the art. A demethanizer overhead stream (e.g., a clean vapor methane stream) is obtained as the top product from the demethanizer of the CFZ process, while a final product stream (e.g., high pressure acid liquid product) is obtained as the bottoms product. Any heavier hydrocarbons in the feed to the CFZ recovery system are also removed as the bottoms product. For this process, dehydration is necessary upstream of the cryogenic CFZ recovery system to ensure that hydrates do not form in the cryogenic equipment.
The dehydration of the feed stream for the cryogenic CFZ recovery system may the use rapid cycle swing adsorption processes and units to dehydrate this stream. In the cryogenic controlled freeze zone recovery system, various steps may be utilized to dehydrate the stream. For example, the steps may be similar to the steps used in a configuration of
In one or more embodiments, the material may include an adsorbent material supported on a non-adsorbent support. Non-limiting examples of adsorbent materials may include alumina, microporous zeolites, carbons, cationic zeolites, high silica zeolites, highly siliceous ordered mesoporous materials, sol gel materials, aluminum phosphorous and oxygen (ALPO) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials containing predominantly aluminum phosphorous and oxygen), silicon aluminum phosphorous and oxygen (SAPO) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials containing predominantly silicon aluminum phosphorous and oxygen), metal organic framework (MOF) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials comprised of a metal organic framework) and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials comprised of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks). Other materials include microporous and mesoporous sorbents functionalized with functional groups. Examples of functional groups, which may be used for CO2 removal, may include primary, secondary, tertiary amines and other non protogenic basic groups such as amidines, guanidines and biguanides.
In one or more embodiments, the adsorbent bed unit may be utilized to separate contaminants from a feed stream. The method may include passing a gaseous feed stream at a feed pressure through an adsorbent bed unit having an adsorbent contactor to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream, wherein the adsorbent contactor has a first portion and a second portion; interrupting the flow of the gaseous feed stream; performing a depressurization step, wherein the depressurization step reduces the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit; performing a purge step, wherein the purge step reduces the partial pressure of the adsorbate within the adsorbent bed unit and wherein the purge step involves passing a purge stream to a mid-purge distribution zone between first portion and the second portion; performing a re-pressurization step, wherein the re-pressurization step increases the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit; and repeating the steps a) to e) for at least one additional cycle.
Further, in one or more embodiments, the adsorbent bed unit may include an adsorbent bed that can be used for the separation of a target gas form a gaseous mixture. The adsorbent is usually comprised of an adsorbent material supported on a non-adsorbent support, or contactor. Such contactors contain substantially parallel flow channels wherein 20 volume percent, preferably 15 volume percent or less of the open pore volume of the contactor, excluding the flow channels, is in pores greater than about 20 angstroms. A flow channel is taken to be that portion of the contactor in which gas flows, if a steady state pressure difference is applied between the point or place at which a feed stream enters the contactor and the point or place at which a product stream leaves the contactor. In the contactor, the adsorbent is incorporated into the wall of the flow channel.
In one or more embodiments, the rapid cycle swing adsorption process in the present techniques is a rapid cycle temperature swing adsorption (RCTSA) and a pressure swing adsorption (PSA). For RCTSA or combined RCTSA and RCPSA, the total cycle times are typically less than 600 seconds, less than 300 seconds, preferably less than 200 seconds, more preferably less than 100 seconds, and even more preferably less than 60 seconds.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrative embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention.
Deckman, Harry W., Johnson, Robert A., Kelley, Bruce T., Oelfke, Russell H., Ramkumar, Shwetha
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10675615, | Nov 11 2014 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | High capacity structures and monoliths via paste imprinting |
| 10744449, | Nov 16 2015 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company; Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Adsorbent materials and methods of adsorbing carbon dioxide |
| 11033852, | May 31 2016 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes |
| 11033854, | May 31 2016 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes |
| 11110388, | Aug 31 2016 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes related thereto |
| 11148091, | Dec 21 2016 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Self-supporting structures having active materials |
| 11260339, | Mar 18 2016 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes related thereto |
| 11318410, | Dec 21 2018 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Flow modulation systems, apparatus, and methods for cyclical swing adsorption |
| 11318413, | Sep 01 2016 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Swing adsorption processes using zeolite structures |
| 11331620, | Jan 24 2018 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes |
| 11376545, | Apr 30 2019 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Rapid cycle adsorbent bed |
| 11413567, | Feb 28 2018 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes |
| 11433346, | Oct 16 2019 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Dehydration processes utilizing cationic zeolite RHO |
| 11642619, | Nov 16 2015 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company; EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING COMPANY | Adsorbent materials and methods of adsorbing carbon dioxide |
| 11655910, | Oct 07 2019 | EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING COMPANY | Adsorption processes and systems utilizing step lift control of hydraulically actuated poppet valves |
| 11707729, | Dec 21 2016 | EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING COMPANY | Self-supporting structures having active materials |
| 11857913, | Jan 24 2018 | EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING COMPANY | Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes |
| 12059647, | Nov 16 2015 | EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING COMPANY; Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Adsorbent materials and methods of adsorbing carbon dioxide |
| ER6374, |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 1868138, | |||
| 3103425, | |||
| 3124152, | |||
| 3142547, | |||
| 3508758, | |||
| 3602247, | |||
| 3788036, | |||
| 3967464, | Jul 22 1974 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Air separation process and system utilizing pressure-swing driers |
| 4187092, | May 15 1978 | Billings Energy Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing increased thermal conductivity and heat capacity to a pressure vessel containing a hydride-forming metal material |
| 4261815, | Mar 08 1976 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Magnetic separator and method |
| 4324565, | Aug 30 1979 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | Removal of lubricant mists and lubricant vapors from a gaseous stream |
| 4325565, | Mar 03 1980 | General Motors Corporation | Cambering vehicle |
| 4329162, | Jul 03 1980 | Corning Glass Works | Diesel particulate trap |
| 4340398, | May 20 1981 | UOP, DES PLAINES, IL , A NY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP | Pressure swing adsorption recovery |
| 4386947, | Apr 25 1980 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Apparatus for adsorbing fuel vapor |
| 4445441, | Jun 01 1983 | Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Slag tap gas flow inducement in wet-bottom furnaces |
| 4461630, | Sep 30 1982 | UOP, DES PLAINES, IL , A NY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; KATALISTIKS INTERNATIONAL, INC | Product recovery in pressure swing adsorption process and system |
| 4496376, | Jan 26 1978 | Litton Systems, Inc | Variable area molecular sieve container having a thermal control system |
| 4705627, | Feb 04 1982 | Toray Industries, Inc. | Absorption apparatus including rotary valve |
| 4711968, | Oct 03 1986 | EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO | Process for the hydrofomylation of sulfur-containing thermally cracked petroleum residua |
| 4737170, | Nov 15 1985 | Normalair-Garrett (Holdings) Ltd. | Molecular sieve bed containers |
| 4770676, | May 16 1986 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Recovery of methane from land fill gas |
| 4783205, | Oct 01 1986 | Normalair-Garrett (Holdings) Ltd. | Aircraft on-board gas generating apparatus |
| 4784672, | Oct 08 1987 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Regeneration of adsorbents |
| 4790272, | Oct 15 1987 | TURBODYNE SYSTEMS, INC | Non-circular poppet valves for internal combustion engine cylinder assemblies |
| 4814146, | Mar 01 1986 | Degussa Aktiengesellschaft | Device for the containment of monolithic catalysts |
| 4816039, | Feb 24 1986 | The BOC Group, Inc. | PSA multicomponent separation utilizing tank equalization |
| 4877429, | Mar 06 1989 | Valve device for P.S.A. or R.P.S.A. systems | |
| 4977745, | Jul 06 1983 | Method for the recovery of low purity carbon dioxide | |
| 5110328, | Jun 07 1989 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho | Solvent adsorber and solvent recovery system |
| 5125934, | Sep 28 1990 | The BOC Group, Inc. | Argon recovery from argon-oxygen-decarburization process waste gases |
| 5169006, | Nov 14 1991 | Continuous magnetic separator | |
| 5174796, | Oct 09 1991 | UOP | Process for the purification of natural gas |
| 5224350, | May 11 1992 | Advanced Extraction Technologies, Inc. | Process for recovering helium from a gas stream |
| 5234472, | Nov 14 1988 | The BOC Group plc | Separation of gas mixtures including hydrogen |
| 5292990, | Dec 07 1988 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Zeolite composition for use in olefinic separations |
| 5306331, | Mar 18 1993 | Permea, Inc. | Process for cooling the feed gas to gas separation systems |
| 5354346, | Oct 01 1992 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Purge effluent repressurized adsorption process |
| 5365011, | May 29 1992 | The BOC Group, Inc. | Method of producing unsaturated hydrocarbons and separating the same from saturated hydrocarbons |
| 5370728, | Sep 07 1993 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Single bed pressure swing adsorption system and process |
| 5486227, | Oct 06 1993 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Integrated process for purifying and liquefying a feed gas mixture with respect to its less strongly adsorbed component of lower volatility |
| 5547641, | Jan 10 1995 | Caterpillar Inc. | Catalytic converter exhaust section for an internal combustion engine |
| 5565018, | Jul 12 1995 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Optimal pressure swing adsorption refluxing |
| 5672196, | Aug 01 1995 | The BOC Group, Inc.; BOC GROUP, INC , THE | Process and apparatus for the separation of gases |
| 5700310, | Dec 29 1995 | MG GENERON, INC | Removal of oil from compressed gas with macroporous polymeric adsorbent |
| 5733451, | May 20 1994 | Englehard/ICC | Core for interacting with a fluid media flowing therethrough and method of making the same |
| 5735938, | Jan 15 1997 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Method for production of nitrogen using oxygen selective adsorbents |
| 5750026, | Jun 02 1995 | Corning Incorporated | Device for removal of contaminants from fluid streams |
| 5769928, | Dec 12 1996 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | PSA gas purifier and purification process |
| 5792239, | Oct 21 1994 | IACX Energy LLC | Separation of gases by pressure swing adsorption |
| 5807423, | Sep 27 1996 | BOC GROUP, INC , THE | Process and apparatus for gas separation |
| 5811616, | Jun 13 1995 | Innovene USA LLC | BF3 gas recovery process |
| 5827358, | Nov 08 1996 | Impact MST, Incorporated | Rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption oxygen concentration method and apparatus |
| 5906673, | May 15 1997 | IACX Energy LLC | Pressure swing system with auxiliary adsorbent bed |
| 5912426, | Jan 30 1997 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | System for energy recovery in a vacuum pressure swing adsorption apparatus |
| 5924307, | May 19 1997 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Turbine/motor (generator) driven booster compressor |
| 5935444, | May 14 1998 | AMCOL International Corporation | Method and apparatus for removing oil from water on offshore drilling and production platforms |
| 5968234, | Apr 14 1998 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Temperature swing adsorption with regeneration by elevated pressure ASU nitrogen-enriched gas |
| 5976221, | Dec 29 1995 | MG Generon, Inc. | Removal of oil from compressed gas with macroporous polymeric adsorbent |
| 5997617, | Jan 31 1997 | RIC Investments, LLC | Pressure swing absorption system with multi-chamber canister |
| 6007606, | Dec 09 1997 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | PSA process and system |
| 6011192, | May 22 1998 | Membrane Technology and Research, Inc | Membrane-based conditioning for adsorption system feed gases |
| 6023942, | Jun 20 1997 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Process for liquefaction of natural gas |
| 6053966, | Mar 03 1998 | L AIR LIQUIDE, SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L ETUDE ET L EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE | Absorbent having heterogeneous exchange factor and PSA process employing such an absorbent |
| 6063161, | Apr 24 1996 | QUEST AIR CASES INC | Flow regulated pressure swing adsorption system |
| 6096115, | Nov 25 1998 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process and system utilizing two product storage tanks |
| 6099621, | Mar 14 1997 | Exxon Research and Engineering Company | Membranes comprising aminoacid salts in polyamine polymers and blends |
| 6129780, | Feb 26 1998 | L'Air Liquide | Process and device for purification of gas by adsorption with fixed horizontal beds |
| 6136222, | Dec 11 1991 | Bend Research, Inc. | Liquid absorbent solutions for separating nitrogen from natural gas |
| 6147126, | Feb 10 1998 | Exxon Research and Engineering Company | Gas conversion using hydrogen from syngas gas and hydroconversion tail gas |
| 6152991, | Apr 17 1997 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Multilayer adsorbent beds for PSA gas separation |
| 6156101, | Feb 09 1999 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Single bed pressure swing adsorption process and system |
| 6171371, | Apr 07 1998 | L AIR LIQUIDE, SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L ETUDE ET L EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE | Process and unit for producing oxygen by adsorption with a short cycle |
| 6176897, | Dec 31 1996 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | High frequency pressure swing adsorption |
| 6179900, | Oct 09 1997 | GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH; Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | Process for the separation/recovery of gases |
| 6183538, | Feb 09 1999 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption gas flow control method and system |
| 6194079, | Apr 19 1995 | CSP TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA, LLC | Monolithic polymer composition having an absorbing material |
| 6210466, | Aug 10 1999 | UOP LLC | Very large-scale pressure swing adsorption processes |
| 6231302, | Jun 08 1999 | Thermal control system for gas-bearing turbocompressors | |
| 6245127, | May 27 1999 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Pressure swing adsorption process and apparatus |
| 6284021, | Sep 02 1999 | BOC GROUP, INC , THE | Composite adsorbent beads for adsorption process |
| 6311719, | Aug 10 1999 | CAIRE INC | Rotary valve assembly for pressure swing adsorption system |
| 6322612, | Dec 23 1999 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | PSA process for removal of bulk carbon dioxide from a wet high-temperature gas |
| 6345954, | Jun 23 1995 | FLOWSERVE, INC | Dry gas seal contamination prevention system |
| 6398853, | Dec 16 1999 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Gas separation with split stream centrifugal turbomachinery |
| 6402813, | Jan 25 2000 | L AIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME A DIRECTOIRE ET CONSEIL DE SURVEILLANCE POUR L ETUDE ET L EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE | Process for purifying a gas by adsorption of the impurities on several active carbons |
| 6406523, | Jun 09 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Rotary pressure swing adsorption apparatus |
| 6425938, | Nov 01 2000 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Single bed pressure swing adsorption process |
| 6432379, | Apr 01 1996 | Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC | Apparatus and methods for storing and releasing hydrogen |
| 6436171, | Jul 22 1999 | The BOC Group, Inc | Oxygen-selective adsorbents |
| 6444012, | Oct 30 2000 | Engelhard Corporation | Selective removal of nitrogen from natural gas by pressure swing adsorption |
| 6444014, | Feb 27 1998 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | VPSA process using adsorbent materials |
| 6444523, | Apr 04 2001 | Macronix International Co., Ltd. | Method for fabricating a memory device with a floating gate |
| 6451095, | Dec 01 1997 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Modular pressure swing adsorption apparatus |
| 6457485, | Aug 10 1999 | CAIRE INC | Rotary valve assembly for pressure swing absorption system |
| 6471939, | May 29 2001 | EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO | Synthetic porous crystalline material ITQ-12, its synthesis and use |
| 6488747, | Jun 10 1999 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Pressure swing adsorption with axial or centrifugal compression machinery |
| 6497750, | Feb 26 2001 | Engelhard Corporation | Pressure swing adsorption process |
| 6500234, | Feb 27 1998 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Rate-enhanced gas separation |
| 6500241, | Dec 19 2000 | FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC | Hydrogen and carbon dioxide coproduction |
| 6500404, | May 31 1997 | Consejo Superior de Investigacones Cientificas; Universidad Politecnica de Valencia | Zeolite ITQ-3 |
| 6503299, | Nov 03 1999 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process for the production of hydrogen |
| 6506351, | Aug 11 2000 | THE BOC GROUP,INC | Removal of nitrogen oxides from gas streams |
| 6514318, | Jun 10 1999 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Multistage system for separating gas by adsorption |
| 6514319, | Dec 08 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Life support oxygen concentrator |
| 6517609, | Oct 28 1999 | L AIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME A DIRECTOIRE ET CONSEIL DE SURVEILLANCE POUR L ETUDE ET L EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE | Installation for the cyclic treatment of fluid by adsorption with valves with improved sealing |
| 6531516, | Mar 27 2001 | ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Co. | Integrated bitumen production and gas conversion |
| 6533846, | Jun 12 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Modular pressure swing adsorption apparatus with clearance-type valve seals |
| 6565627, | Mar 08 2002 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Self-supported structured adsorbent for gas separation |
| 6565635, | Sep 25 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Layered manifold pressure swing adsorption device and method |
| 6565825, | Aug 30 2000 | Japan as represented by Secretary of Agency of Industrial Science and Technology | Porous alumina fabrication procedures |
| 6572678, | Dec 28 2001 | Membrane Technology and Research, Inc | Natural gas separation using nitrogen-selective membranes of modest selectivity |
| 6579341, | May 19 2000 | Membrane Technology and Research, Inc.; Membrane Technology and Research, Inc | Nitrogen gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes |
| 6593541, | May 19 1998 | Bystronic Laser AG | Method for machining workpieces and machine tool |
| 6595233, | Aug 16 2000 | Siemens Building Technologies AG | Safety device for a fluid transmission |
| 6605136, | Jul 10 2002 | INOGEN, INC | Pressure swing adsorption process operation and optimization |
| 6607584, | Mar 16 2001 | L'Air Liquide-Societe Anonyme a Directoire et Conseil de Surveillance pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude | Adsorbent with improved mass transfer for a VSA or PSA process |
| 6630012, | Apr 30 2001 | Battelle Memorial Institute K1-53 | Method for thermal swing adsorption and thermally-enhanced pressure swing adsorption |
| 6631626, | Aug 12 2002 | ConocoPhillips Company | Natural gas liquefaction with improved nitrogen removal |
| 6641645, | Jun 13 2002 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Vacuum swing adsorption process with controlled waste gas withdrawal |
| 6651645, | Jun 08 1999 | Pressurized combustion and heat transfer process and apparatus | |
| 6660064, | Mar 08 2002 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Activated carbon as sole absorbent in rapid cycle hydrogen PSA |
| 6660065, | May 06 2002 | Respironics, Inc | Pressure swing adsorption dryer for pneumatically driven pressure intensifiers |
| 6692626, | Apr 20 2001 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Adsorbent laminate structures |
| 6712087, | Aug 10 1999 | CAIRE INC | Rotary valve assembly for pressure swing adsorption system |
| 6742507, | Nov 02 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Feed composition modification for internal combustion engines |
| 6746515, | Apr 30 2001 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Method and apparatus for thermal swing adsorption and thermally-enhanced pressure swing adsorption |
| 6752852, | Jul 17 2001 | American Air Liquide, Inc. | Apparatus for removing moisture from fluids comprising acid gases; methods of using same, and compositions |
| 6770120, | May 01 2002 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Radial adsorption gas separation apparatus and method of use |
| 6773225, | May 30 2002 | MITSUBISHI HITACHI POWER SYSTEMS, LTD | Gas turbine and method of bleeding gas therefrom |
| 6802889, | Dec 05 2002 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption system for gas separation |
| 6814771, | Nov 30 2001 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Evaporative emissions control device with internal seals |
| 6835354, | Apr 05 2000 | HYRADIX, INC | Integrated reactor |
| 6840985, | Jun 10 1999 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Surge absorber flow regulation for modular pressure swing adsorption |
| 6866950, | Dec 08 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Methods and apparatuses for gas separation by pressure swing adsorption with partial gas product feed to fuel cell power source |
| 6889710, | Nov 15 2002 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Rotary sequencing valve with flexible port plate |
| 6890376, | Jul 12 1999 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Gas purification system with an integrated hydrogen sorption and filter assembly |
| 6893483, | Mar 08 2002 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Multilayered adsorbent system for gas separations by pressure swing adsorption |
| 6902602, | Mar 14 2002 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Gas separation by combined pressure swing and displacement purge |
| 6916358, | Aug 29 2001 | Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation | Adsorbent for separating nitrogen from mixed gas of oxygen and nitrogen |
| 6918953, | Jul 09 2003 | LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC | Modular pressure swing adsorption process and apparatus |
| 6921597, | Sep 14 1998 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Electrical current generation system |
| 6974496, | Apr 30 2001 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Apparatus for thermal swing adsorption and thermally-enhanced pressure swing adsorption |
| 7025801, | Jun 21 2002 | L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme àl Directoire et Conseil de Surveillance pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | Method for controlling a unit for the treatment by pressure swing adsorption of at least one feed gas |
| 7027929, | Nov 21 2003 | DIVESTCO INC | Seismic data interpolation system |
| 7029521, | Oct 11 2001 | Ifo Ceramics Aktiebolag | Process and device in connection with the production of oxygen or oxygen enriched air |
| 7074323, | Mar 03 2000 | Shell Oil Company | Use of low pressure distillate as absorber oil in a FCC recovery section |
| 7077891, | Aug 11 2003 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Adsorbent sheet material for parallel passage contactors |
| 7087331, | Oct 30 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Energy efficient gas separation for fuel cells |
| 7094275, | Dec 01 1997 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Modular pressure swing adsorption apparatus |
| 7097925, | Oct 30 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | High temperature fuel cell power plant |
| 7112239, | May 20 2003 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha; Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki | Gas storage apparatus |
| 7117669, | May 05 2004 | Eaton Corporation | Temperature swing adsorption and selective catalytic reduction NOx removal system |
| 7122073, | Sep 18 2000 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Low void adsorption systems and uses thereof |
| 7128775, | May 12 2004 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Radial bed flow distributor for radial pressure adsorber vessel |
| 7144016, | Apr 30 2001 | AESSEAL Plc | Dry gas seal |
| 7160356, | Apr 15 2003 | BOARD OF REGENT, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEMS | Dithiolene functionalized polymer membrane for olefin/paraffin separation |
| 7160367, | Dec 11 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | PSA with adsorbents sensitive to contaminants |
| 7166149, | Jan 12 2004 | UOP LLC | Adsorption process for continuous purification of high value gas feeds |
| 7172645, | Jun 30 2003 | Oracle America, Inc | Gas filtration and storage using activated carbon/graphite foam monoliths |
| 7189280, | Jun 29 2004 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Adsorptive separation of gas streams |
| 7250073, | Dec 09 1999 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Life support oxygen concentrator |
| 7250074, | Aug 29 2003 | Velocys, Inc | Process for separating nitrogen from methane using microchannel process technology |
| 7255727, | Jun 19 2002 | L AIR LIQUIDE, SOCIETE ANONYME A DIRECTOIRE ET CONSEIL DE SURVEILLANCE POUR L ETUDE ET L EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE | Method for treating at least one feed gas mixture by pressure swing adsorption |
| 7258725, | Dec 04 2001 | Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation | Gas supplying method and system |
| 7276107, | Dec 23 2003 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Indexing rotary dual valve for pressure swing adsorption systems |
| 7279029, | May 21 2004 | INOGEN, INC | Weight-optimized portable oxygen concentrator |
| 7285350, | Sep 27 2002 | KEEFER, BOWIE | Enhanced solid oxide fuel cell systems |
| 7297279, | Jan 21 2005 | AMCOL International Corporation | Method for removing oil from water coalescing in a polymer particle/fiber media |
| 7311763, | Apr 22 2005 | AES DEVELOPMENT CO , INC | Gas separation vessel apparatus |
| 7314503, | Dec 08 2003 | REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC | Process to remove nitrogen and/or carbon dioxide from methane-containing streams |
| 7354562, | Oct 25 2002 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Simultaneous shift-reactive and adsorptive process to produce hydrogen |
| 7387849, | Mar 14 2002 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Hydrogen recycle for solid oxide fuel cell |
| 7390350, | Apr 26 2005 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Design and operation methods for pressure swing adsorption systems |
| 7404846, | Apr 26 2005 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Adsorbents for rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption processes |
| 7438079, | Feb 04 2005 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | In-line gas purity monitoring and control system |
| 7449049, | Mar 08 2005 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Method of purifying a natural gas by mercaptan adsorption |
| 7456131, | Aug 28 2006 | UT-Battelle, LLC | Increased thermal conductivity monolithic zeolite structures |
| 7510601, | Dec 20 2005 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Portable medical oxygen concentrator |
| 7527670, | Dec 20 2001 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for gas purification |
| 7553568, | Nov 19 2003 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | High efficiency load-following solid oxide fuel cell systems |
| 7578864, | Jul 14 2003 | Hitachi Metals, Ltd | Ceramic honeycomb filter and its production method |
| 7604682, | Feb 18 2003 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Apparatus and process for the purification of air |
| 7637989, | Dec 31 2003 | Merits Health Products Co., Ltd. | Rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption oxygen concentration method and mechanical valve for the same |
| 7641716, | Jan 12 2005 | LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC | Methods and apparatus for improved control of PSA flow variations |
| 7645324, | Jan 07 2005 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Engineered adsorbent structures for kinetic separation |
| 7651549, | Jun 13 2006 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Pressure swing adsorption process with improved recovery of high-purity product |
| 7674319, | Mar 06 2006 | LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC | PSA pressure measurement and control system |
| 7674539, | Oct 27 2000 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Systems and processes for providing hydrogen to fuel cells |
| 7687044, | Jun 10 1999 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Chemical reactor with pressure swing adsorption |
| 7713333, | Dec 20 2006 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Adsorbents for pressure swing adsorption systems and methods of use therefor |
| 7717981, | Oct 04 2006 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Performance stability in shallow beds in pressure swing adsorption systems |
| 7722700, | Sep 18 2006 | VENTEC LIFE SYSTEMS,INC | Apparatus and method of providing concentrated product gas |
| 7731782, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Temperature swing adsorption of CO2 from flue gas utilizing heat from compression |
| 7740687, | Feb 13 2007 | IACX Energy LLC | Pressure swing adsorption method and system for separating gas components |
| 7744676, | Mar 09 2006 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | TSA process |
| 7744677, | May 25 2007 | PROMETHEUS TECHNOLOGIES, LCC | Systems and methods for processing methane and other gases |
| 7758051, | Apr 30 2004 | AESSEAL Plc | Gas seal assembly |
| 7758988, | Sep 14 1998 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | System that includes a fuel cell and an oxygen gas delivery system |
| 7763098, | Nov 18 2005 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Rapid cycle syngas pressure swing adsorption system |
| 7763099, | Dec 14 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole separation of carbon dioxide from natural gas produced from natural gas reservoirs |
| 7792983, | Jul 31 2007 | LinkedIn Corporation | Method and apparatus for checkpoint and restart of pseudo terminals |
| 7793675, | Feb 04 2005 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | In-line gas purity monitoring and control system |
| 7806965, | Feb 12 2007 | KATHY ANN STINSON NICHOLES IN HER REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD L STINSON 1994 TRUST U A DTD OCTOBER 24, 1994, AS AMENDED | System for separating carbon dioxide from a produced gas with a methanol removal system |
| 7819948, | Oct 29 2007 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Rotary valve |
| 7828877, | Nov 05 2004 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Separation of carbon dioxide from other gases |
| 7828880, | Oct 17 2005 | METAWATER CO , LTD | Gas collection method and apparatus therefor |
| 7854793, | Jun 30 2006 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Pressure swing adsorption system with indexed rotatable multi-port valves |
| 7858169, | Mar 29 2007 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | Honeycomb segment |
| 7862645, | Feb 01 2008 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Removal of gaseous contaminants from argon |
| 7867320, | Sep 30 2008 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Multi-port indexing drum valve for VPSA |
| 7902114, | Jan 05 2001 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Adsorbent coating compositions, laminates and adsorber elements |
| 7938886, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Process for removing a target gas from a mixture of gases by thermal swing adsorption |
| 7947118, | May 15 2007 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Containerized gas separation system |
| 7947120, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Temperature swing adsorption of CO2 from flue gas using a parallel channel contractor |
| 7959720, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Low mesopore adsorbent contactors for use in swing adsorption processes |
| 8016918, | Oct 04 2006 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Performance stability in rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption systems |
| 8034164, | Jan 12 2005 | LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC | Methods and apparatus for improved control of PSA flow variations |
| 8071063, | Feb 21 2008 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Separation of hydrogen from hydrocarbons utilizing zeolitic imidazolate framework materials |
| 8128734, | Jun 11 2004 | CHENGDU TIANLI CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Two stage pressure swing adsorption process for producing enriched-oxygen |
| 8142745, | Feb 21 2008 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Separation of carbon dioxide from nitrogen utilizing zeolitic imidazolate framework materials |
| 8142746, | Feb 21 2008 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Separation of carbon dioxide from methane utilizing zeolitic imidazolate framework materials |
| 8192709, | Feb 21 2008 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Separation of methane from higher carbon number hydrocarbons utilizing zeolitic imidazolate framework materials |
| 8210772, | Mar 23 2009 | ANTEA USA, INC | Soil vapor extraction remediation system with vapor stream separation |
| 8227121, | Dec 01 2003 | Intelligent Energy Limited | Fuel cell supply including information storage device and control system |
| 8262773, | Jul 26 2005 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Method of purifying hydrocarbons and regeneration of adsorbents used therein |
| 8262783, | Jan 24 2007 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Gas separation device |
| 8268043, | Dec 23 2009 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Modular compact adsorption bed |
| 8268044, | Jul 13 2010 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Separation of a sour syngas stream |
| 8272401, | Sep 09 2008 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Compact pressure balanced rotary valve |
| 8287629, | Jun 06 2007 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Hydrogen gas storage device |
| 8319090, | May 30 2008 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Organic photoelectric conversion material and organic thin-film photoelectric conversion device |
| 8337594, | Apr 17 2009 | CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS CSIC ; UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE VALENCIA UPV | Use of a microporous crystalline material of zeolitic nature with RHO structure in natural gas processing |
| 8361200, | Oct 15 2009 | SAYARI, ABDELHAMID | Materials, methods and systems for selective capture of CO2 at high pressure |
| 8361205, | Dec 23 2009 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Modular compact adsorption bed |
| 8377173, | Nov 08 2007 | The University of Akron | Amine absorber for carbon dioxide capture and processes for making and using the same |
| 8444750, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Removal of CO2, N2, or H2S from gas mixtures by swing adsorption with low mesoporosity adsorbent contactors |
| 8470395, | Jun 01 2010 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Low energy, high recovery, rapid cycle kinetic PSA for biogas |
| 8480795, | Aug 09 2005 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Absorbent composition containing molecules with a hindered amine and a metal sulfonate, phosphonate or carboxylate structure for acid gas scrubbing process |
| 8512569, | Dec 31 2007 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Fluid filtration articles and methods of making and using the same |
| 8518356, | Jul 27 2010 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Method and apparatus for adjustably treating a sour gas |
| 8529662, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Removal of heavy hydrocarbons from gas mixtures containing heavy hydrocarbons and methane |
| 8529663, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Process for removing a target gas from a mixture of gases by swing adsorption |
| 8529664, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Removal of a target gas from a mixture of gases by swing adsorption with use of a turboexpander |
| 8529665, | May 12 2010 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Systems and methods for gas separation using high-speed induction motors with centrifugal compressors |
| 8535414, | Sep 30 2010 | VERSUM MATERIALS US, LLC | Recovering of xenon by adsorption process |
| 8545602, | May 18 2007 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Removal of CO2, N2, and H2S from gas mixtures containing same |
| 8551444, | Oct 27 2006 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Compact pressure swing reformer |
| 8573124, | May 11 2010 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Electronic safe/arm system and methods of use thereof |
| 8591627, | Apr 07 2009 | Innosepra LLC | Carbon dioxide recovery |
| 8591634, | Jan 28 2010 | VERSUM MATERIALS US, LLC | Method and equipment for selectively collecting process effluent |
| 8616233, | Jul 02 2008 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Rotary face seal with anti-crowning features |
| 8657922, | Mar 30 2009 | Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation | Pressure swing adsorption-type gas separation method and separation apparatus |
| 8673059, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Rapid temperature swing adsorption contactors for gas separation |
| 8680344, | Jan 25 2011 | ZEOCHEM LLC | Molecular sieve adsorbent blends and uses thereof |
| 8715617, | Mar 15 2012 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Hydrogen production process with low CO2 emissions |
| 8752390, | Jul 13 2010 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Method and apparatus for producing power and hydrogen |
| 8778051, | Mar 15 2012 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process |
| 8784533, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Temperature swing adsorption process for the separation of target species from a gas mixture |
| 8784534, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Pressure-temperature swing adsorption process |
| 8784535, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Pressure-temperature swing adsorption process for the separation of heavy hydrocarbons from natural gas streams |
| 8795411, | Feb 07 2011 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Method for recovering high-value components from waste gas streams |
| 8808425, | Aug 30 2011 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Process and apparatus for producing hydrogen and carbon monoxide |
| 8808426, | Sep 04 2012 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Increasing scales, capacities, and/or efficiencies in swing adsorption processes with hydrocarbon gas feeds |
| 8814985, | Dec 22 2008 | REGER-WAGNER, NORMAN | Composite adsorbent bead, process for its production, gas separation process and gas adsorption bed |
| 8852322, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Gas purification process utilizing engineered small particle adsorbents |
| 8858683, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Swing adsorption processes utilizing controlled adsorption fronts |
| 8875483, | Sep 03 2009 | ANSALDO ENERGIA SWITZERLAND AG | Gas turbine generator set |
| 8906138, | Nov 12 2007 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Methods of generating and utilizing utility gas |
| 8921637, | Nov 15 2010 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Kinetic fractionators, and cycling processes for fractionation of gas mixtures |
| 8939014, | Apr 06 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Identification and use of an isomorphously substituted molecular sieve material for gas separation |
| 8940263, | Apr 10 2013 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Removal of hydrogen and carbon monoxide impurities from gas streams |
| 9005561, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Selective sulfur removal process |
| 9017457, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and systems having a reciprocating valve head assembly and swing adsorption processes related thereto |
| 9028595, | Nov 15 2010 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Kinetic fractionators, and cycling processes for fractionation of gas mixtures |
| 9034078, | Sep 05 2012 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and systems having an adsorbent contactor and swing adsorption processes related thereto |
| 9034079, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Methods of removing contaminants from hydrocarbon stream by swing adsorption and related apparatus and systems |
| 9050553, | Jun 01 2010 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Low energy, high recovery, rapid cycle kinetic PSA for biogas |
| 9067168, | May 28 2010 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Integrated adsorber head and valve design and swing adsorption methods related thereto |
| 9095809, | Dec 06 2012 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | Selectivation of adsorbents for gas separation |
| 9108145, | May 16 2013 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc | Purification of air |
| 9120049, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and systems having a rotary valve assembly and swing adsorption processes related thereto |
| 9126138, | Apr 30 2008 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Method and apparatus for removal of oil from utility gas stream |
| 9162175, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Apparatus and systems having compact configuration multiple swing adsorption beds and methods related thereto |
| 9168485, | Mar 01 2011 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Methods of removing contaminants from a hydrocarbon stream by swing adsorption and related apparatus and systems |
| 20010047824, | |||
| 20020053547, | |||
| 20020124885, | |||
| 20020162452, | |||
| 20030075485, | |||
| 20030129101, | |||
| 20030131728, | |||
| 20030170527, | |||
| 20030202918, | |||
| 20030205130, | |||
| 20030223856, | |||
| 20040099142, | |||
| 20040118277, | |||
| 20040197596, | |||
| 20040232622, | |||
| 20050109419, | |||
| 20050114032, | |||
| 20050129952, | |||
| 20050145111, | |||
| 20050150378, | |||
| 20050229782, | |||
| 20050252378, | |||
| 20060048648, | |||
| 20060049102, | |||
| 20060076270, | |||
| 20060099096, | |||
| 20060105158, | |||
| 20060162556, | |||
| 20060165574, | |||
| 20060169142, | |||
| 20060236862, | |||
| 20070084241, | |||
| 20070084344, | |||
| 20070222160, | |||
| 20070253872, | |||
| 20070261550, | |||
| 20070261557, | |||
| 20070283807, | |||
| 20080051279, | |||
| 20080072822, | |||
| 20080128655, | |||
| 20080282883, | |||
| 20080282884, | |||
| 20080282885, | |||
| 20080282886, | |||
| 20080282887, | |||
| 20080282892, | |||
| 20080289497, | |||
| 20080307966, | |||
| 20080314550, | |||
| 20090004073, | |||
| 20090014902, | |||
| 20090025553, | |||
| 20090025555, | |||
| 20090037550, | |||
| 20090071333, | |||
| 20090079870, | |||
| 20090107332, | |||
| 20090151559, | |||
| 20090162268, | |||
| 20090180423, | |||
| 20090241771, | |||
| 20090284013, | |||
| 20090294366, | |||
| 20090308248, | |||
| 20090314159, | |||
| 20100059701, | |||
| 20100077920, | |||
| 20100089241, | |||
| 20100186445, | |||
| 20100212493, | |||
| 20100251887, | |||
| 20100252497, | |||
| 20100263534, | |||
| 20100282593, | |||
| 20100288704, | |||
| 20110011803, | |||
| 20110031103, | |||
| 20110067440, | |||
| 20110067770, | |||
| 20110146494, | |||
| 20110217218, | |||
| 20110277620, | |||
| 20110291051, | |||
| 20110296871, | |||
| 20110308524, | |||
| 20120024152, | |||
| 20120031144, | |||
| 20120067216, | |||
| 20120152115, | |||
| 20120222551, | |||
| 20120222552, | |||
| 20120222553, | |||
| 20120222554, | |||
| 20120222555, | |||
| 20120255377, | |||
| 20120308456, | |||
| 20120312163, | |||
| 20130061755, | |||
| 20130225898, | |||
| 20140013955, | |||
| 20140060326, | |||
| 20140157986, | |||
| 20140208797, | |||
| 20140216254, | |||
| 20140338425, | |||
| 20150013377, | |||
| 20150068397, | |||
| 20150196870, | |||
| CA2237103, | |||
| CA2297590, | |||
| EP257493, | |||
| EP426937, | |||
| EP1018359, | |||
| EP1577561, | |||
| EP1674555, | |||
| EP2823872, | |||
| FR2924951, | |||
| JP2000024445, | |||
| JP2002253818, | |||
| JP2002348651, | |||
| JP2006016470, | |||
| JP2006036849, | |||
| JP2008272534, | |||
| JP2011169640, | |||
| JP2011280921, | |||
| JP4180978, | |||
| JP58114715, | |||
| JP59232174, | |||
| JP60189318, | |||
| RE40006, | Apr 24 1996 | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC | Flow regulated pressure swing adsorption system |
| WO2002024309, | |||
| WO2002073728, | |||
| WO20051090793, | |||
| WO2011139894, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Aug 10 2016 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Mar 15 2022 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Sep 25 2021 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 25 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 25 2022 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Sep 25 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Sep 25 2025 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 25 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 25 2026 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Sep 25 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Sep 25 2029 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 25 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 25 2030 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Sep 25 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |