Tools and methods for forming modified mechanical roughening profiles are disclosed. In at least one embodiment, an engine block is provided including a body defining a cylinder bore having a bore surface. The bore surface may have defined therein a plurality of grooves extending from the bore surface and each groove may have a base and a top portion. The top portion may have opposing chamfered edges. The chamfered edges may be formed by a tool including at least one cutting element having triangular teeth and at least one cutting element having rectangular teeth. In another embodiment, a tool including at least one cutting element having curved teeth and at least one cutting element having rectangular teeth may be used to form grooves having a curved/radiused edge surface. The disclosed roughening profiles may reduce oxide growth when a coating is applied to the bore surface.
|
1. An engine block, comprising:
a body defining a cylinder bore having a bore surface, the bore surface having defined therein a plurality of grooves extending from the bore surface; and
each groove having a base and a top portion, the top portion having opposing chamfered edges.
2. The engine block of
4. The engine block of
5. The engine block of
6. The engine block of
7. The engine block of
8. The engine block of
|
The present disclosure relates to tools and methods for mechanical roughening profile modification, for example, in engine bores.
Engine blocks (cylinder blocks) may include one or more cylinder bores that house pistons of an internal combustion engine. Engine blocks may be cast, for example, from cast iron or aluminum. Aluminum is lighter than cast iron, and may be chosen in order to reduce the weight of a vehicle and improve fuel economy. Aluminum engine blocks may include a liner, such as an aluminum or cast iron liner. Aluminum liners may be cast-in to the engine block. Aluminum engine blocks that are liner-less or that have cast-in aluminum liners may include a coating on the bore surface. The coating (e.g., a steel-based, thermally sprayed coating) may reduce wear and/or friction.
Mechanical roughening may be used to prepare the surface of the engine bore to receive the coating so that the adhesion between the coating and substrate is sufficient to withstand manufacturing and operating loads. For example, a series of square grooves may be cut into the substrate using a side cutting end mill. After the grooves are formed, the tops may be deformed with a swiper (e.g., a rotary swage-wiper) to produce an undercut. The resulting profile may have dovetail-shaped peaks with sharp corners, which can lead to oxidation.
In at least one embodiment, an engine block is provided. The engine block may include a body defining a cylinder bore having a bore surface, the bore surface having defined therein a plurality of grooves extending from the bore surface; and each groove having a base and a top portion, the top portion having opposing chamfered edges.
The chamfered edges may form an included angle with a top or side of the groove that is obtuse. In one embodiment, the included angle is at least 110 degrees. In another embodiment, the top portion of the groove may have only obtuse included angles. The chamfered edges may have a chamfer angle of 20 to 70 degrees or 30 to 60 degrees. In one embodiment, each of the chamfered edges may have a chamfer length that is at most ⅓ of a maximum groove peak width. The top portion may be wider than the base portion such that the groove forms an undercut with the bore surface.
In at least one embodiment, an interpolated roughening cutting tool is provided. The tool may include a body having at least first and second cutting elements coupled thereto; the first cutting element including rectangular cutting teeth; and the second cutting element including non-rectangular cutting teeth; wherein the first and second cutting elements are configured to create grooves in a surface that have a top portion with blunt edge surfaces.
In one embodiment, the second cutting element includes triangular cutting teeth and the first and second cutting elements are configured to create grooves with chamfered edges. The rectangular cutting teeth may be configured to create groove sides that are substantially perpendicular to the surface and the triangular cutting teeth may be configured to create chamfered edges. In one embodiment, the first and second cutting elements are configured to create grooves with chamfered edges having a chamfer angle of 20 to 70 degrees. In another embodiment, the first and second cutting elements are configured to create grooves with chamfered edges each having a chamfer length that is at most ⅓ of a maximum groove peak width. In another embodiment, the second cutting element may include curved cutting teeth having a peak and two concave sides extending therefrom. The rectangular cutting teeth may be configured to create groove sides that are substantially perpendicular to the surface and the curved cutting teeth may be configured to create rounded edges.
The tool may also include third, fourth, fifth, and sixth cutting elements. The third cutting element may include rectangular cutting teeth offset from the cutting teeth of the first cutting element, the fourth cutting element may include non-rectangular cutting teeth offset from the cutting teeth of the second cutting element, and the fifth and sixth cutting elements may each include a substantially flat cutting surface. In one embodiment, the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth cutting elements are equally spaced around the body, the first and third cutting elements are adjacent to each other, and the second and fourth cutting elements are adjacent to each other.
In at least one embodiment, a method is provided. The method may include roughening a bore surface by interpolating a cutting tool having a first cutting element including rectangular cutting teeth and a second cutting element including non-rectangular cutting teeth; and the first and second cutting elements cutting grooves in the bore surface that have a top portion with blunt edge surfaces.
In one embodiment, the non-rectangular cutting teeth are triangular cutting teeth and the first and second cutting elements cut grooves in the bore surface that have a top portion with opposing chamfered edges. The method may further include deforming the grooves having a top portion with opposing chamfered edges to reduce a height of the grooves and generate an undercut relative to the bore surface, wherein the grooves retain the opposing chamfered edges after being deformed. In another embodiment, the non-rectangular cutting teeth are curved cutting teeth having a peak and two concave sides extending therefrom and the first and second cutting elements cut grooves in the bore surface that have a top portion with rounded edges.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
With reference to
If the engine block parent material is aluminum, then a cast iron liner or a coating may be provided in the cylinder bores to provide the cylinder bore with increased strength, stiffness, wear resistance, or other properties. For example, a cast iron liner may cast-in to the engine block or pressed into the cylinder bores after the engine block has been formed (e.g., by casting). In another example, the aluminum cylinder bores may be liner-less but may be coated with a coating after the engine block has been formed (e.g., by casting). In another embodiment, the engine block parent material may be aluminum or magnesium and an aluminum or magnesium liner may be inserted or cast-in to the engine bores. Casting in of an aluminum liner into an aluminum engine block is described in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/972,144 filed Dec. 17, 2015, now U.S. Publication No. 2017/0175668 on Jun. 22, 2017, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
Accordingly, the bore surface of the cylinder bores may be formed in a variety of ways and from a variety of materials. For example, the bore surface may be a cast-iron surface (e.g., from a cast iron engine block or a cast-iron liner) or an aluminum surface (e.g., from a liner-less Al block or an Al liner). The disclosed roughening process may be applied to any suitable bore surface, therefore, the term bore surface may apply to a surface of a liner-less block or to a surface of a cylinder liner or sleeve that has been disposed within the cylinder bore (e.g., by interference fit or by casting-in).
With reference to
Examples of this mechanical roughening process, and tools used therein, are disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,726,874, issued May 20th, 2014; U.S. Pat. No. 9,511,467, issued Dec. 6th, 2016; and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/913,871, filed Jun. 10th, 2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference herein. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand that, based on the present disclosure, the disclosed tools and cutting elements may be incorporated into the interpolated roughening processes disclosed in the incorporated references.
With reference to
With reference to
It has been found that modifying the groove profile to reduce/eliminate sharp corners may reduce the number of oxide nucleation sites that form the oxide fans shown in
With reference to
In at least one embodiment, the chamfered portion(s) 44 may have a chamfer angle 46 and a chamfer length 48. The chamfer angle 46 may be measured from the vertical (e.g., axis perpendicular to the bore surface). In one embodiment, the chamfer angle 46 may be from 20 to 70 degrees, or any sub-range therein, such as 30 to 60 degrees, 40 to 50 degrees, or about 45 degrees (e.g., ±3 degrees). The chamfer length 48 may be measured in a direction parallel to the bore surface (horizontal direction, as shown). In one embodiment, the chamfer length 48 may less than ½ of the total width of the groove, such as at most ⅓ of the total width of the groove. For example, if the groove has a total width of 150 μm, then the chamfer length 48 may be at most 50 μm (for a ⅓ max). The above chamfer angles and lengths may refer to the groove 40 (e.g., pre-deformation) or to the groove 42 (e.g., post-deformation). If the chamfer angles and lengths refer to the pre-deformation groove, then the chamfer angles and lengths may be altered by the deformation process. For example, the chamfer angles may increase after deformation (the included angles may also increase).
In another embodiment, each corner may include two or more chamfered portions 44, for example, 2 or 3 chamfered portions 44. The multiple chamfered portions may be connected to form a double-angled surface. The total length of the multiple chamfers may be the same as the single-chamfer lengths described above (e.g., each chamfer in the multiple chamfer embodiments may be relatively short). The multiple chamfered portions may have an increasing chamfer angle 46 from the first chamfered portion (e.g., nearest the base of the groove) to the last chamfered portion (e.g., nearest the top of the groove). If there are two chamfered portions per side of the groove, then the first chamfered portion (nearest the base) may have a first chamfer angle and the second chamfered portion (nearest the top) may have a second chamfer angle that is greater than the first. For example, the first chamfer angle may be from 20 to 40 degrees and the second chamfer angle may be from 50 to 70 degrees. In one embodiment, the first chamfer angle may be about 30 degrees (e.g., ±5 degrees) and the second chamfer angle may be about 60 degrees (e.g., ±5 degrees).
With reference to
With reference to
Referring to
Cutting elements 100 and 300 may have similar structures and shapes. However, the arrangement of teeth and the dimensions may be different. Tooth 118, which is closest to leading edge 120, may have an outermost side wall that may be flush with relief surface 104 or offset with relief surface 104. Tooth 318, which is closest to leading edge 320, may have an outermost side wall that is offset from relief surface 304 by a greater amount than tooth 108. The offset of tooth 308 may be any suitable value, such as 400 microns. In other embodiments, the offset may be 1 to 500 microns. Accordingly, there be an offset, such as 400 microns, between the relief edge of tooth 108 and the relief edge of tooth 308. The relief surface facing side of the other teeth 108 of cutting element 100 and the relief surface facing side of the other teeth 308 of cutting element 300 may also be offset from each other. The offset of each corresponding tooth in cutting elements 100 and 300 may be the same or different. This may allow the edges to cut two separate rows of grooves, one by each offset element, with acceptable stress on the teeth.
Referring to
Referring to
Cutting elements 200 and 400 may have similar structures and shapes. However, the arrangement of teeth and the dimensions may be different. Tooth 218, which is closest to leading edge 220, may have an outermost peak or side wall that may be flush with relief surface 204 or offset with relief surface 204. Tooth 418, which is closest to leading edge 420, may have an outermost peak or side wall that is offset from relief surface 404 by a greater amount than tooth 408. The offset of tooth 408 may be any suitable value, such as 400 microns. In other embodiments, the offset may be 1 to 500 microns. Accordingly, there be an offset, such as 400 microns, between the peak of tooth 208 and the peak of tooth 408. The peaks of the other teeth 208 of cutting element 200 and the peaks of the other teeth 408 of cutting element 400 may also be offset from each other. The offset of each corresponding tooth in cutting elements 200 and 400 may be the same or different. This may allow the edges to cut two separate rows of grooves, one by each offset element, with acceptable stress on the teeth.
Referring to
Referring to
With reference to
In the embodiment shown, the cutting element 100 may be positioned at 60 degrees and the cutting element 300 may be positioned at 120 degrees. Accordingly, the two cutting elements 100 and 300 having rectangular teeth may be positioned adjacent to each other on the cutting tool 700. In the embodiment shown, the cutting element 200 may be positioned at 240 degrees and the cutting element 400 may be positioned at 300 degrees. Accordingly, the two cutting elements 200 and 400 having triangular teeth may be positioned adjacent to each other on the cutting tool 700. The cutting elements 500 may be positioned such that they separate the cutting elements having rectangular teeth from the cutting elements having triangular teeth.
While the cutting elements 100-500 may be positioned in the manner shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand, based on the present disclosure, that other configurations may be used. For example, the positions of cutting elements 100 and 300 may be flipped with the positions of cutting elements 200 and 400 or the positions shown may be rotated by any multiple of 60 degrees. As described above and below, there may be multiple sets of cutting elements on the cutting tool 700. For example, there may be at least 2, 3, or 4 sets of cutting elements. The sets of cutting elements may be spaced along a longitudinal axis of the cutting tool 700. Each set of cutting elements may be radially offset or rotated relative to the adjacent set of cutting elements. In the embodiment shown, the sets may be rotated by 30 degrees (shown in phantom). However, the sets may be rotated by any suitable value, such as 45 degrees or 60 degrees.
In addition, the cutting elements 200 and 400 in the above description may be replaced by the cutting element 600 and a second cutting element 600′ that is offset from the first. The offset may be similar to the offsets in cutting elements 100/300 and 200/400. For example, the offset cutting element 600′ may include a tooth that is closest to leading edge that is offset from the relief surface by a greater amount than the closest tooth in cutting element 600. The offset may be any suitable value, such as 400 microns or 1 to 500 microns. Accordingly, there may be an offset, such as 400 microns, between the peaks of the teeth in each cutting element. This may allow the edges to cut two separate rows of grooves, one by each offset element, with acceptable stress on the teeth.
With reference to
As shown in
In embodiments where the cutting tool 700 includes cutting elements 200 and 400, the cutting tool may be configured to form chamfered grooves, such as those shown in
In embodiments where the cutting tool 700 includes cutting elements 600 and 600′, the cutting tool may be configured to form curved or radiused grooves, such as those shown in
As described above, the cutting tool 700 may have any suitable number of cutting elements. In at least one embodiment, the cutting tool 700 may include at least one cutting element having rectangular teeth and at least one cutting element having non-rectangular teeth. The cutting element(s) having rectangular teeth may be configured to form rectangular grooves in the bore surface (or other surface being roughened) or to form perpendicular sides on grooves having non-rectangular shapes (e.g., cutting perpendicular sides in to triangular grooves). The cutting element(s) having non-rectangular teeth, such as triangular teeth or concave/curved teeth, may be configured to form non-rectangular grooves in the bore surface or to form non-perpendicular sides on grooves having a rectangular shape. For example, triangular teeth may form triangular grooves or may form angled sides on a rectangular groove. Or, concave/curved teeth may form concave/curved grooves or may form curved/radiused sides on a rectangular groove. The cutting elements may have shaped, sized, and configured to form grooves having the shape and dimensions described above (e.g., chamfer angle, corner radius, etc.).
Once the cutting tool 700 has been interpolated around the bore surface (or applied to another surface), the roughened bore surface may include a plurality of non-rectangular grooves. For example, the grooves may have a chamfered shape (e.g., rectangular with the corners removed) or a curved/radiused shape. As used herein, the groove shape may refer to the cross-sectional shape of the groove extending from the bore surface towards a center of the bore. These base of these grooves may be generally perpendicular to the bore surface (e.g., at about 90 degrees). To generate an undercut in the grooves, a deformation process may be performed.
The deformation process may be performed according to the process described in incorporate Ser. No. 14/972,144, however, any deformation process that reduces the groove height and generates an undercut may be used. For example, a swiper tool (e.g., rotary swage-wiper) may be used to deform the grooves. The swiper tool may include a cylindrical shank and a plurality of swiping projections. Each swiping projection may project outward from the center of the swiper tool. The swiper tool may have the same diameter as the cutting tool, and the swiper elements may have the same axial length as the cutting elements, so that the swiping tool and the cutting tool may be run over the same tool path to simplify programming and reduce motion errors. Each swiping projection may include a relief surface, a back surface, and a rake surface. A chamfer may extend between rake surface and relief surface. The chamfer or like edge preparation, such as a hone, may be used to ensure that the tool deforms the peaks instead of cutting them. In one embodiment, the angle of the chamfer relative to the landing surface 616 may be 15 degrees. In other variations, the angle may be 10 to 20 degrees, or a hone with a radius of 25 to 100 microns. In one embodiment, the angle between the rake surface and the relief surface of adjacent swiping projections may be 110 degrees.
In at least one embodiment, the swiping tool is dull enough that it does not cut into the inner surface of the cylinder bore. Instead, the swiping tool may mechanically deform grooves formed in the inner surface of the cylinder bore. Referring to
With reference to
As shown in
As shown in
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
Stephenson, David Alan, Beyer, Timothy George, Dowling, Jr., William Edmunds
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5931038, | Feb 25 1997 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of machining bore surface of cylinder block and apparatus therefor |
7000584, | Mar 04 2004 | Brunswick Corporation | Thermally insulated cylinder liner |
7513236, | Jul 08 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Insert casting component, cylinder block, method for forming coating on insert casting component, and method for manufacturing cylinder block |
8726874, | May 01 2012 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Cylinder bore with selective surface treatment and method of making the same |
9382868, | Apr 14 2014 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Cylinder bore surface profile and process |
20100059012, | |||
20100101526, | |||
20140360355, | |||
20140364042, | |||
20160097340, | |||
20180127861, | |||
DE102009008741, | |||
DE102010052735, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 27 2017 | DOWLING, WILLIAM EDMUNDS, JR | Ford Motor Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 041564 | /0482 | |
Jan 27 2017 | STEPHENSON, DAVID ALAN | Ford Motor Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 041564 | /0482 | |
Jan 27 2017 | BEYER, TIMOTHY GEORGE | Ford Motor Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 041564 | /0482 | |
Jan 30 2017 | Ford Motor Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 11 2022 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 25 2021 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 25 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 25 2022 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 25 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 25 2025 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 25 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 25 2026 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 25 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 25 2029 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 25 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 25 2030 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 25 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |