An auto-calibrated current sensing comparator is provided. A secondary dynamic comparator shares the same inputs and acts to adjust a calibration control of the current sensing comparator. The calibration control may be in the form of adjusting the offset of the current sensing comparator or adjusting a propagation delay that is added to its output.
|
1. A circuit comprising:
a power switch;
a continuous comparator that monitors a current across the power switch;
a dynamic comparator which shares inputs of the continuous comparator;
the dynamic comparator being adapted to provide a logic signal;
a calibration control adapted to calibrate the continuous comparator;
wherein a clock for the dynamic comparator is coupled with a control signal for changing a state of the power switch; and
wherein the calibration control comprises a counter coupled with an output of the dynamic comparator and one of a variable comparator offset or a variable propagation delay that is directly connected to the continuous comparator; the counter being adapted to receive the logic signal;
wherein the counter operates to increment or decrement the variable comparator offset or the variable propagation delay.
7. A method of operating a power switch in a circuit, comprising:
monitoring a current across the power switch with a continuous comparator; and
calibrating the continuous comparator using a calibration control comprising a counter and one of a variable comparator offset or a variable propagation delay that is directly connected to the continuous comparator;
wherein calibrating the continuous comparator is based on an operation of a dynamic comparator which shares inputs of the continuous comparator;
wherein the dynamic comparator is clocked by a control signal for changing a state of the power switch; the dynamic comparator being adapted to provide a logic signal;
wherein an output of the dynamic comparator increments or decrements the counter Which in turn adjusts the calibration applied to the continuous comparator;
the counter being adapted to receive the logic signal.
4. A switched mode power supply including a circuit that comprises:
a power switch;
a continuous comparator that monitors a current across the power switch;
a dynamic comparator which shares inputs of the continuous comparator;
the dynamic comparator being adapted to provide a logic signal;
a calibration control adapted to calibrate the continuous comparator;
wherein a clock for the dynamic comparator is coupled with a control signal for changing a state of the power switch; and
wherein the calibration control comprises a counter coupled with an output of the dynamic comparator and one of a variable comparator offset or a variable propagation delay that is directly connected to the continuous comparator;
the counter being adapted to receive the logic signal; wherein the counter operates to increment or decrement the variable comparator offset or the variable propagation delay.
5. The switched mode power supply of
6. The switched mode power supply of
8. The method of
9. The method of
11. The method of
|
The present disclosure relates to a continuous comparator with improved calibration, and in particular to circuits, methods for calibration of a continuous comparator, and a switched mode power supply comprising a continuous comparator with improved calibration.
Current sensing comparators are widely used in buck and boost converters. Their function is to detect that current has exceeded a maximum current limit or that the current has changed polarity.
However a current sensing comparator will have an inherent offset and delay that mean the comparator will tend not to change state at the correct moment. These offsets and delays can be compensated for by adding a fixed offset to the comparator threshold level. However, even this compensation is not ideal, because the ideal value of the comparator offset is affected by random process mismatch, inductor value and input or output voltage variation. Therefore a fixed comparator offset will not be able to track the ideal value.
This problem is exacerbated by industry trends for ever smaller inductor values which mean that inductor current fluctuates at greater frequencies.
It is therefore desired to improve the calibration of continuous comparators.
According to a first aspect of the disclosure there is provided a circuit comprising:
A “comparator” in the present disclosure is a comparator circuit that is designed to compare the voltage or current between two inputs. The comparator circuit may include elements such as a fixed or variable offset, or a fixed or variable delay line. This applies equally to continuous comparators and to the clocked comparators described herein.
Optionally, the calibration control is coupled with an output of the dynamic comparator via a counter which operates to increment or decrement the calibration control.
Optionally, the calibration control comprises a variable comparator offset.
Optionally, the calibration control comprises a variable propagation delay that can be added to the comparator output.
Optionally, the continuous comparator is a zero crossing comparator.
Optionally, the continuous comparator is a current limit comparator.
According to a second aspect of the disclosure there is provided a switched mode power supply including a circuit that comprises:
Optionally, the switched mode power supply comprises a buck convertor with a zero crossing comparator and/or a current limit comparator being the continuous comparator(s) of the second aspect.
Optionally, the switched mode power supply comprises a boost convertor with a zero crossing comparator and/or a current limit comparator being the continuous comparator(s) of the second aspect.
Optionally, the switched mode power supply comprises a buck-boost convertor with a zero crossing comparator and/or a current limit comparator being the continuous comparator(s) of the second aspect.
According to a third aspect of the disclosure there is provided a method of operating a switch in a circuit, comprising:
Optionally, the output of the dynamic convertor increments or decrements a counter which in turn adjusts the calibration applied to the continuous comparator.
Optionally, calibrating the continuous comparator comprises varying an offset that is applied to it.
Optionally, the method comprises adding a propagation delay to the output of the continuous comparator and calibrating the continuous comparator comprises varying the delay that is added.
Optionally, the continuous comparator is a zero crossing comparator.
Optionally, the continuous comparator is a current limit comparator.
Optionally, the circuit comprises a switched mode power supply.
Optionally, the switched mode power supply comprises a buck convertor with a zero crossing comparator and/or a current limit comparator being the continuous comparator(s) of the third aspect.
Optionally, the switched mode power supply comprises a boost convertor with a zero crossing comparator and/or a current limit comparator being the continuous comparator(s) of the third aspect.
Optionally, the switched mode power supply comprises a buck-boost convertor with a zero crossing comparator and/or a current limit comparator being the continuous comparator(s) of the third aspect.
According to a fourth aspect of the disclosure there is provided a circuit comprising:
Optionally, the calibration control is coupled with an output of the dynamic comparator via a counter which operates to increment or decrement the calibration control.
According to a fifth aspect of the disclosure there is provided a method of operating a switch in a circuit, comprising:
The disclosure will be described below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The disclosure provides for the calibration of a continuous comparator which monitors a current through a switch. The disclosure is not limited to any particular comparator architecture and any comparator arrangement for monitoring a current through a switch, either directly or indirectly, may be provided. In particular, the continuous comparator may comprise a voltage comparator coupled with an impedance element (which could be the ON-resistance of the switch), so that the direct monitoring of the voltage provides the basis for the current monitoring. The calibration of the continuous comparator is achieved by providing a dynamic comparator which shares the same inputs as the continuous comparator and which provides an input for a calibration control.
A “dynamic comparator” may also be generally referred to as a “clocked comparator” or a “latched comparator”. Such a comparator is selectively activated with a clock signal so that the dynamic comparator only makes a comparison when the clock signal is high. In contrast, a continuous comparator will output a 1 or a 0 any time that a high or low signal is applied to its input.
In one aspect of the disclosure, the calibration control comprises varying an offset of the continuous comparator. In an alternative aspect, the calibration control comprises varying a propagation delay that is applied to the output of the continuous comparator.
The dynamic comparator may be clocked by coupling its latch with a switching node voltage. Alternatively, the dynamic comparator can be clocked by coupling its latch with a control signal that is applied for operating the switch.
A first aspect of the disclosure, wherein the calibration control comprises varying an offset of the continuous comparator, is shown in
A dynamic comparator 110 is also provided, which shares the same inputs as the continuous comparator 100. The dynamic comparator provides an input for a calibration control which in this aspect comprises a counter 112 and the variable offset 102 of the comparator 100.
The dynamic comparator can be clocked by coupling its latch with the switching node voltage 114. However it is also possible for the dynamic comparator to be clocked by coupling its latch with the output of the logic circuitry 106, which provides a control signal for operating the switch 104. This is the arrangement that is illustrated in
A dynamic comparator has a short reaction time from a clock signal, which lets it perform its comparison at a well-defined point in time. It also can hold the result for further use. Therefore the dynamic comparator can be used to check if the voltage over the switch is equal to the intended voltage at the moment of opening the switch. The dynamic comparator should have a low offset itself which can be achieved by construction or by trimming.
The offset of the main comparator 100 is controlled in small discrete steps by the digital output from the UP/DOWN counter 112. The purpose of the automatic calibration is to find the digital value for which the switch 104 is opened at exactly the right moment.
Each time the switch 104 opens, the dynamic comparator 110 generates a signal “up” or “down” for the up/down counter 112. This will increase or decrease the offset of the continuous comparator 100.
After a certain amount of clock periods, the counter value will alternate around the ideal value. The switch 104 then switches very close to the ideal moment.
An additional advantage of continuous calibration (over one-time trimming during production) is that the offset in the main comparator 100 will track any variation and will always make sure that the opening of switch takes place very close to the ideal moment.
A second aspect of the disclosure, wherein the calibration control comprises varying a propagation delay that is applied to the output of the continuous comparator, is shown in
However, in the aspect illustrated in
The delay circuit may comprise a delay line of any suitable architecture, for example a series of buffers that can be selectively activated via a multiplexer to provide different signal delays as desired, or as an analog delay based on an RC time-constant in which either the C (capacitor) and/or the R (resistor) can be trimmed in discrete steps.
The dynamic comparator can be clocked by coupling its latch with the switching node voltage 114. However it is also possible for the dynamic comparator to be clocked by coupling its latch with the output of the logic circuitry 106, which provides a control signal for operating the switch 104. This is the arrangement that is illustrated in
Continuous comparators are used for various purposes and as component parts of various other circuits, and the disclosure provides circuitry that comprises continuous comparators calibrated as described. Examples of such circuitry include switched mode power supplies which may include DC-DC converters such as buck converters, boost converters or buck-boost converters.
A typical buck converter known to the inventor is shown in
A controller 370 is provided that receives outputs from the zero-cross and current limit comparators and controls pMOS 320 and nMOS 315 transistors via respective inverter and buffer. When the output voltage is too low, the pMOS transistor “P” is turned on (“PMOS”=‘1’). This will cause the current “IL” in the inductor “L” to rise and current is supplied to the output “VOUT” 371. At a certain moment, the inductor current will cross a maximum-current threshold. This will trigger the comparator and will make the signal “Current limit” high. This is the sign for the controller to open the pMOS transistor “P” and close the nMOS transistor “N” (“PMOS”=‘0’ and “NMOS”=‘1’). The inductor current will now drop while still flowing to the output “VOUT”. At a certain moment the current changes polarity (crosses zero Ampere). This will trigger the zero-crossing comparator (“Zero-cross”=‘1’). This is the sign for the controller to open the nMOS transistor “N” and to wait for a next cycle with zero current flowing in the inductor and with both power switches “P” and “N” open. A timing diagram of the signals of PMOS 380, NMOS 381, inductor current 382, current limit 383, and zero cross 384 is illustrated.
A similar kind of operation takes place in a boost converter, an example of which is illustrated in
For the most efficient and safe behavior of the buck converter or boost converter, it is important that the power switches (transistors “P” and “N”) open and close at the correct moment (either when the current is equal to the current limit, or equal to zero). Incorrect switch timing could cause an overshoot (voltage stress), or could cause a current flowing in parasitic diodes to flow, which might trigger a latch-up situation, or could result in a current higher than the current limit, which might be too high for the switch and/or inductor.
However the current tends to vary rapidly, in particular in view of industry trends for ever smaller inductor values: the dI/dT of the inductor current is inversely proportional to the inductor value and proportional to the voltage over the inductor. There is also a delay in the comparator itself, in the control logic and in the driver for the switch.
In order to achieve the correct switching moment, an offset can be added to the comparator threshold level. The ideal value of the comparator offset is however affected by random process mismatch, inductor value and input or output voltage variation. A comparator offset that is fixed during production will not be able to track the ideal value. Opening switches too late or too early will result in a reduced efficiency of the converter.
The comparators used in buck and boost converters can be calibrated according to the methods of the disclosure. Specifically, the calibration method (of either the offset correction or propagation delay adjustment aspects) can be applied to a zero crossing comparator and/or a current limit comparator in a buck converter or a boost converter.
The offset of the main comparator 520 is controlled in small discrete steps by the digital output from the UP/DOWN counter 530. The purpose of the automatic calibration is to find the digital value for which the power switch is opened at exactly the right moment.
Each time the switch opens, the dynamic comparator generates a signal “up” or “down” for the up/down counter. This will increase or decrease the offset of the continuous comparator.
The clock for the dynamic comparator can be either the gate voltage of the switch, or can be any other logic signal that indicates that the switch will be opened shortly after (as in the figure above: the unbuffered version of the gate-voltage of the switch) or that the switch has opened very recently.
After a certain amount of clock periods, the counter value will alternate around the ideal value. The turning off of the nMOS switch “N” now happens very close to the ideal moment.
An additional advantage of continuous calibration (over one-time trimming during production) is that the offset in the main comparator will track any variation and will always make sure that the opening of switch “N” takes place very close to the ideal moment.
The components of the circuit are similar to those of
The offset of the main comparator is fixed and may be chosen such that when the delay circuit is set to apply a minimum propagation delay value the controller (logic/state-machine) can open the NMOS switch when the current through the switch has not yet reached zero.
The propagation delay of the main comparator is controlled in small discrete steps by the digital output from the UP/DOWN counter, and this provides an automatic calibration in a similar manner as that described above for the circuit of
Again, the clock for the dynamic comparator can be either the gate voltage of the switch, or can be any other logic signal that indicates that the switch will be opened shortly after (as in the figure above: the unbuffered version of the gate-voltage of the switch) or that the switch has opened very recently.
Similar principles apply to the embodiments of the disclosure which are illustrated in
The methods and apparatus of the disclosure therefore provides for accurate current limit and zero-current switching. When the disclosure is implemented, the circuit will not need to be trimmed during production, as the circuit can track changing situations such as changing output or input voltages.
Various modifications and improvements can be made to the above without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
For example, the figures showing the buck and boost converters generally assume that they operate in discontinuous conduction mode. However the disclosure also applies to a continuous mode of operation, including for detecting when a continuous mode has to be changed to a discontinuous mode.
It is also to be appreciated that the conductivity types of specific embodiments may generally be reversed. In particular, switches which are drawn as pMOS transistors with an inverter in the diagrams may be alternatively implemented as nMOS transistors with a buffer; and vice versa.
Kruiskamp, Marinus Wilhelmus, de Cremoux, Guillaume
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7868595, | Jun 17 2008 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Apparatus and method for soft-start mode transition in a switching regulator |
20080298106, | |||
20100194370, | |||
20110018516, | |||
20120235653, | |||
20140277812, | |||
20140340122, | |||
CN102377338, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 10 2014 | KRUISKAMP, MARINUS WILHELMUS | Dialog Semiconductor GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034216 | /0142 | |
Oct 10 2014 | DE CREMOUX, GUILLAUME | Dialog Semiconductor GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034216 | /0142 | |
Oct 10 2014 | KRUISKAMP, MARINUS WILHELMUS | DIALOG SEMICONDUCTOR B V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034216 | /0142 | |
Oct 10 2014 | DE CREMOUX, GUILLAUME | DIALOG SEMICONDUCTOR B V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034216 | /0142 | |
Oct 14 2014 | Dialog Semiconductor B.V. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 01 2022 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 01 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 01 2023 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 01 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 01 2026 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 01 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 01 2027 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 01 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 01 2030 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 01 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 01 2031 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 01 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |