In conventional optical receivers the dynamic range is obtained by using variable gain amplifiers (VGA) with a fixed trans-impedance amplifier (TIA) gain. To overcome the SNR problems inherent in conventional receivers an improved optical receiver comprises an automatic gain control loop for generating at least one gain control signal for controlling gain of both the VGA and the TIA. Ideally, both the resistance and the gain of the TIA are controlled by a gain control signal.
|
1. An optical receiver comprising:
a photodetector for converting an optical signal into an input electrical current signal;
a transimpedance amplifier (TIA) for converting the input electrical current signal into an input voltage signal, the TIA including a variable feedback resistor and a variable gain feed-forward amplifier;
a variable gain amplifier (VGA) for amplifying the input voltage signal to a desired voltage level; and
an automatic gain control loop for generating a first gain control signal for controlling gain of the VGA, and a second gain control signal for controlling the gain of the TIA;
wherein the automatic gain control loop further comprises a signal conditioning circuit for generating the second gain control signal for controlling gain of the TIA based on the first gain control signal;
wherein the second gain control signal is capable of adjusting a value of the variable feedback resistor, whereby the TIA gain varies linearly with a level of the second gain control signal; and
wherein the second gain control signal is also capable of varying a feed forward gain Ao of the TIA.
2. The optical receiver according to
3. The optical receiver according to
4. The optical receiver according to
5. The optical receiver according to
|
The present invention relates to an optical receiver, and in particular to an optical receiver with an analog front-end including an automatic gain control loop.
High order modulation schemes, like PAM-m and m-QAM (m>2), are being used in short reach optical communication links in modern data centers for future 400 Gb/s links to achieve higher spectral efficiency with respect to the basic NRZ modulation scheme. Such high order modulation schemes require optical links with strengthened linearity requirement on the transmitter and receiver to not distort the transmitted signal.
Conventionally, linear optical receivers 1 are implemented with an automatic gain control (AGC) loop 8 to fix the receiver AFE output amplitude for the following ADC 6, as shown in
Signals from advanced modulation schemes have high signal to noise ratio (SNR), which must be preserved in the receiver chain until the digital processing, in order to achieve the required bit error rate requirement. Thus, a highly-linear, low-noise optical receiver AFE 5 alongside a high-resolution ADC 6 are required in order not to degrade the received signal SNR. Furthermore, a wide bandwidth receiver AFE 5 is required to avoid any inter symbol interference introduced in the received signal. Consequently, high baud rate coherent optical receivers 1 are characterized using four main aspects: 1) noise, 2) linearity, 3) bandwidth, and 4) dynamic range.
Optical receivers 1 with low noise and high linearity are required in order not to degrade the received signal SNR. For small input PD current levels, the received signal SNR is dominated by the receiver noise; however, for large input PD current levels, the received signal SNR is determined based on the receiver linearity. Typically, the receiver AFE noise is governed by the front-end TIA 3 while its linearity is dominated by the following VGA 4. Thus, a low noise front-end TIA 3 is required to be implemented with a highly linear VGA 4 in the coherent optical receivers 1.
The dynamic range of linear optical receivers is defined as the ratio between the maximum overall trans-impedance gain of the receiver AFE 5 to the minimum trans-impedance gain, which translates to the minimum and maximum photo diode currents that can be amplified by the receiver AFE 5 for fixed output signal amplitude. In coherent optical links, the received optical power can vary between 10 dBm to −15 dBm, which translates to 5 mA to 150 uA photo diode current assuming 0.5 A/W diode responsivity. Conventionally, fixed TIA gain and VGA are utilized in the optical receiver AFE as shown in
In this architecture, the whole dynamic range of the receiver is obtained by the VGAs 14a and 14b; however, the front-end TIA 3 is implemented with a fixed trans-impedance gain (fixed feedback resistor 12). In order to increase receiver linearity, the value of the TIA feedback resistor 12 is set based on the maximum affordable PD current that can be amplified without degrading the VGAs linearity performance. Therefore, a TIA 3 with a feedback resistor 12 having a small value is utilized in this architecture to improve the receiver linearity in expense of its noise performance, as the TIA noise is inversely proportional to the value of the resistor 12. Large receiver noise degrades the received signal SNR specifically for small input PD current. Consequently, this architecture suffers from noise-linearity tradeoff in determining front-end TIA gain, which limits the received signal SNR either at high input levels or small levels. Furthermore, increasing the number of amplifying stages in the RF chain increases the receiver power consumption as well as it reduces its overall bandwidth.
An object of the present invention is to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art by providing an analog front end with an automatic gain control loop for controlling the gain from both the VGA and the TIA.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an optical receiver comprising:
a photodetector for converting an optical signal into an input electrical current signal;
a transimpedance amplifier (TIA) for converting the input electrical current signal into an input voltage signal;
a variable gain amplifier (VGA) for amplifying the input voltage signal to a desired voltage level; and
an automatic gain control loop for generating at least one gain control signal for controlling gain of the VGA and the TIA.
The invention will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings which represent preferred embodiments thereof, wherein:
While the present teachings are described in conjunction with various embodiments and examples, it is not intended that the present teachings be limited to such embodiments. On the contrary, the present teachings encompass various alternatives and equivalents, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art.
An automatic gain control (AGC) loop 28 may be used to fix the receiver AFE output amplitude for the following ADC 26 and digital back end 27. The AGC loop 28 may be a negative feedback loop that comprises a peak detector 29 and an error amplifier 11. The amplitude of the voltage signal output from the VGA 24 is sensed using the peak detector 29 and compared with a reference voltage signal (OA) using the error amplifier 30 that drives a gain control signal (GC) of the VGA 24. For large loop DC gain, the AGC loop 28 settles when the output voltage of the peak detector 29 equals the reference voltage signal (OA), which is considered as a controlling knop for the receiver AFE output signal amplitude.
Front-end VGTIA and VGA gains are controlled using the same GC signal of the AGC loop 28 (as in
The other configuration to coordinate the gains between both the TIA 23 and the VGA 24 is shown in
With reference to
An automatic gain control (AGC) loop 38 is provided to fix the output amplitude of the receiver AFE 35 for the following ADC 36. The AGC loop 38 is a negative feedback loop that comprises a peak detector 39 and an error amplifier 41. The amplitude of the voltage signal output from the VGA 34 is sensed using the peak detector 39 and compared with the reference voltage signal (OA) using the error amplifier 41, which drives a gain control signal (GC1) to the VGA 34. For large loop DC gain, the AGC loop 38 settles when the output voltage of the peak detector 39 equals the reference voltage signal (OA).
The variable gain TIA (VGTIA) 33 and the VGA 34 are utilized to increase the dynamic range of the optical receiver 30. In the proposed architecture, two different gain control signals, e.g. a first gain control signal GC1 and a second gain control signal GC2, may be utilized for the VGA 34 and the VGTIA 33, respectively. The first gain control signal GC1 is generated using the error amplifier 41 of the AGC loop 38. A signal conditioning circuit 40 is utilized to generate the second gain control signal GC2 for the TIA 33 using the first gain control signal GC1 and the reference voltage OA signal, as illustrated in
The transimpedance gain from the TIA 33 may be controlled by varying a value of a variable feedback resistor 43 and the feed-forward amplifier gain simultaneously. The proposed architecture improves the receiver noise and linearity over wide range of input PD current levels at different reference voltage OA settings. Controlling gain from the VGTIA 33 and the VGA 34 with two different control signals, GC1 and GC2, resolves the trade-off between noise and linearity shown in the prior art. The AFE 35 results in a high SNR of the received signal irrespective to its strength, such that the AFE 35 has the best noise performance for small input currents from the photodetector (PD) 32; while having the best linearity performance for large PD currents.
As illustrated in
On the other hand, the proposed receiver AFE 35 may use a shunt feedback TIA topology to implement the VGTIA 33. Shunt feedback TIA loop stability depends on the feed-forward gain Ao with the value RF of the feedback resistor 43. Accordingly, the phase margin of the VGTIA is expressed as,
where CT is the input node capacitance of the TIA 33 and ωo is the feed-forward amplifier bandwidth of the TIA 33. The above equation depicts that the TIA phase margin degrades significantly by reducing the feedback resistor 43 for constant feed-forward amplifier gain. Thus, implementing the variable gain TIA (VGTIA) 33 with a fixed feed-forward gain Ao has stability issues for small feedback resistor values which limits its dynamic range. The proposed receiver AFE 35 may use a variable gain feed-forward amplifier in the front-end VGTIA 33 to improve its stability by maintaining its phase margin constant by varying the value of the feedback resistor RF and the feed forward gain Ao simultaneously, ideally with the same ratio (in Eq. 1) and preferably keeping RF/Ao constant.
An example of the TIA 33 of the proposed embodiment is shown in
The foregoing description of one or more embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Rylyakov, Alexander, Ahmed, Mostafa
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10955691, | Jun 13 2019 | NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY | Dual loop bias circuit with offset compensation |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
20120155864, | |||
20170126190, | |||
20170288618, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 15 2018 | AHMED, MOSTAFA | Elenion Technologies, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045304 | /0882 | |
Mar 15 2018 | RYLYAKOV, ALEXANDER | Elenion Technologies, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045304 | /0882 | |
Mar 21 2018 | Elenion Technologies, LLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 08 2019 | Elenion Technologies, LLC | HERCULES CAPITAL INC , AS AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048289 | /0060 | |
Mar 24 2020 | HERCULES CAPITAL, INC | ELENION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 052251 | /0186 | |
Sep 10 2020 | Elenion Technologies LLC | NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 063286 | /0538 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 21 2018 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Apr 17 2018 | SMAL: Entity status set to Small. |
Jun 23 2020 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Jun 15 2022 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 01 2022 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 01 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 01 2023 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 01 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 01 2026 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 01 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 01 2027 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 01 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 01 2030 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 01 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 01 2031 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 01 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |