Compounds of biodegradable surfactants useful for optimizing the separation of impurities typical of hydrocarbons, and designed to intervene and stabilize the molecular structure of crude oil, with no significant alterations of the crude's intrinsic composition are disclosed. The biodegradable surfactants compounds coexist with a non-ionic surfactant and an organic mix in emulsion form with the purpose of isolating crude from the pipeline, reduce friction to improve crude flow and to enter the crude macromolecule to modify the hydrocarbon chain to reduce its density and thus its viscosity; including compounds of biodegradable surfactants that comprise sodium hydroxide 1N, potassium chloride, sulphonic acid, dodecanoic acid, nonylphenol, terpene-1 and water, preferably hard water.
|
1. A procedure for producing the composition of biodegradable surfactants, comprising sodium hydroxide 1N, potassium chloride, sulphonic acid, dodecanoic acid, nonylphenol, terpene-1 and water, preferably hard water, the procedure comprising following steps:
in a clean and dry mixer add an amount of hard water less than 50% v/v in respect of the total volume of the compound of the invention and add
2.5-5.5% v/v of sodium hydroxide 1N and 2-4% v/v of potassium chloride;
add 5-15% v/v of sulphonic acid, 3-6% v/v of dodecanoic acid, 3-8% v/v of nonylphenol of 4-10 mols, and shake the mix until it is homogeneous;
once homogeneity is achieved complete the total volume to 100% v/v with hard water, mixing continuously;
shut the system off and let stand for 24 hours;
after the 24-hour standing period extract 60-80% v/v of the solution obtained in step d) and mix it with 20-40% v/v of terpene for 30 minutes in amounts less than 200 liters until a white homogeneous mixture is obtained; and
let stand the product of step e) for at least 6 hours and then apply it following the safety procedures suggested for its use.
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/533,565, filed Nov. 5, 2014, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/475,438, filed May 18, 2012, which claims the benefit of priority to Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/000253, filed Jan. 2, 2012, the disclosures of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. To the extent appropriate, a claim of priority is made to each of the above-disclosed applications.
The compound of biodegradable surfactants of the present invention has been produced for optimizing the separation of impurities usually found in hydrocarbons, and it is designed to intervene and stabilize the molecular structure of crude oil, without significantly altering its intrinsic composition.
Specifically, when the compound of the invention is injected into the reservoir it eliminates the inorganic components present in the aqueous phase while at the same time it regulates the generation of undesired compounds such as organic precipitates which are susceptible to changes in temperature, pressure and loss of volatile components.
The use at surface level of this compound, in addition to eliminating inorganic salts, dispersing asphaltenes and reducing wax content, adds aromatic compounds to the hydrocarbon chain. Further to the above, it reduces crude friction isolating it from the material through which it flows by displacing the crude adhered to the surface of said material. This principle allows the compound of this invention to be used industrially as a cleaner of any surface impregnated with crude, or even those contaminated with any other oily substance.
Environmental impact caused by the use of contaminating chemical products is manifold. Damages are to be found in any area where man conducts production activities causing loss of materials, individual properties and furthermore, irreversible damages to the environment in water, land and air. The use of chemical products is, to a great extent, the origin of the imbalance of Nature's cycles which can indirectly affect human health, even to the point of causing death.
The use of these products in the oil industry is very frequent, both at surface level as well as down in the reservoir, and it usually implies the generation of hazardous waste. With this situation in mind the search for developing chemical products that reduce damages and minimize any kind of detrimental effect that may harm man or his environment is an ongoing activity.
Within this context several initiatives have been attempted to yield a safe product that causes no damage to the environment nor to man and that may be injected into oil wells for cleansing purposes while enhancing physical-chemical properties, and thus stimulating oil production.
In the process of searching for such a product several patent documents have been produced, among them patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,839 which discloses the formulation of a non-toxic, biodegradable and completely safe to human and animal contact industrial solvent. Said compound comprises d-limonene (73-74% v/v), an ethoxylated nonylphenol (16-17% v/v) and fatty acids, namely tall-oil (9-10% v/v). The fatty acid reported in this document is made up of oleic and linoleic acids, among other substances. According to this document the aforementioned product is mixed and applied directly and undiluted to an oil spill or other oil product residues such as greases and heavy crudes.
In spite of the advances presented in patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,839 for cleaning oil spills or to other oil residues, the reported composition has no surfactant activity nor does it prevent the precipitation of clays or asphaltenes common in crude oil. Furthermore, the product disclosed in said patent must be applied undiluted to obtain the desired results, this implying that it must be used in large amounts to achieve the cleansing of hydrocarbons.
Another document that addresses the production of a cleansing compound comprising biodegradable components is patent U.S. Pat. No. 4,511,488. This patent claims a cleansing compound based on a terpene like d-limonene for cleaning heavy crudes, greases and asphalt deposits on hard or flexible layers. Said composition comprises 78 to 96% w/w of a mixture of limonene/surfactant/water in which the individual quantities in the mix are 10-60% w/w of limonene, 10-30% w/w of surfactant and 20-70% w/w of water.
According to said claim the compound would use 2-10 parts of a coupling agent and 2-12 parts of additives to adapt the compound for particular uses. Preferably the compound includes glycols, such as ether glycols like diethylene glycol, hexene glycol or dipropylene glycol. Preferred additives are softening agents, sequestering agents or corrosion inhibitors. Considered surfactants are anionic surfactants (especially amine salts of the dodecylbenzene sulphonic acid), or non-ionic surfactants like the alkylphenol condensates with 4-5 mols of ethylene oxide, particularly the nonylphenol condensate.
Just as in patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,839 the compound claimed in patent U.S. Pat. No. 4,511,488 has no surfactant activity, does not prevent clay or asphaltene precipitation and must be used undiluted. This implies higher costs which become higher when considering that the use of other additives is necessary, such as glycol ethers, softening and sequestering agents and corrosion inhibitors.
Patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,336,428 must be included to complement the state-of-the-art information available. This patent refers to a compound for degreasing deep-sea off-shore oil drilling platforms made of a mix that comprises 5-7% w/w of limonene, 15-21% w/w of a non-ionic surfactant and 0.2-0.4% w/w of an acrylic copolymer as a densifying agent. According to said document preferred surfactants are polyethoxylated nonylphenol and the polymer of methacrylic acid and acrylate. In this case the compound is viscous and substantially clear. In similar fashion to the two previous patents mentioned before this compound cannot be used in undiluted form because effectiveness is lost. So being the case, the cost of using this product is high.
Considering all the above it becomes evident that in the state-of-the-art there is a need for a water-based product, biodegradable, highly efficient, fit to be used on crude oil and its derivatives for enhancing its physical-chemical properties, that optimizes flow within production pipelines both downhole and on the surface, that reduces and disperses organic precipitates, such as waxes and asphaltenes, breaks water-oil emulsions, minimizes organic salts and hydrogen sulphur contents, cleans oily sands and all kinds of surfaces, and that may even be used to reduce organic waste in the environment or for cleaning animals and birds that have become impregnated with oil because of oil spills.
The biodegradable surfactants compound of the present invention is a chemical combination of a non-ionic surfactant and an organic mix in emulsion form. The purpose of this compound is to isolate crude from the tubing, reduce friction to improve crude flow and to enter the oil macromolecule to modify the hydrocarbon chain to reduce its density and thus its viscosity.
The biodegradable surfactants compound reported in the present application has been designed for its application on crude oil so that upon contact with the crude a weak emulsion is formed allowing for a very close interaction between the two; this interaction leads to the extraction of undesired contaminants; at the end the emulsion breaks thus improving the physico-chemical properties of the crude.
This action of the product within the production system is known as pseudoemulsion. This pseudoemulsion produces at its aqueous base an encapsulation of contaminants present thus facilitating their isolation from the reservoir and their removal from the system. Furthermore, the product is capable of generating a sliding effect between the rock pores, moisturizing it with the aqueous phase and improving oil relative permeability. Furthermore, the product will work in light and medium oil reservoirs, and achieved great results with heavy and extra-heavy crudes.
A feature of the biodegradable surfactants compound of the present invention is that it comprises sodium hydroxide 1N, potassium chloride, sulphonic acid, dodecanoic acid, nonylphenol, terpene-1 and water, preferably hard water.
The compound comprises 60-80% v/v of a mix that comprises 2.5-5.5% v/v of sodium hydroxide 1N, 2-4% v/v of potassium chloride, 5-15% v/v of sulphonic acid, 3-6% v/v of dodecanoic acid, 3-8% v/v of nonylphenol reacted with 4-10 mols of ethylene oxide, hard water, and 20-40% v/v terpene.
Specifically, the sodium hydroxide 1N is incorporated into the formula of the invention to dissolve greasy organic compounds with a high molecular weight and to inhibit precipitation of asphaltic components.
Potassium chloride is used in the formula of the invention to prevent clay swelling. This component is added in low concentrations according to the environment in which it will be applied and for its use 7 kilos of potassium chloride are diluted in 150 liters of water.
Sulphonic acid performs as a surfactant in the product, its purpose being to reduce interfacial tension of the water droplets present in the emulsions that contain crude and to facilitate crude transportation, without altering physico-chemical properties. Its concentration in the compound of the invention is very variable. When used in the oil industry it is used at very low concentrations in organic solvents.
Dodecanoic acid is incorporated into the compound of the invention due to its stability and its linear chain which allow it to partially mix with oil and its derivatives, and because of its polar character which warrants that the combination will mix with water. In this formula its function is to stabilize molecular structure.
Another of the components of the formula of the invention is nonylphenol which has a varied function in the formula by allowing for the formation of a soft emulsion to join the organic and inorganic components, it being a good moisturizer and because it is a non-ionic surfactant it can clean surfaces that require the extraction of oil inorganic contaminants and mix them with water.
Finally, terpene I is an excellent asphaltene dispersant and reducer of greasy components existing in oil, such as waxes. Its cyclic structure allows it to perfectly dilute in crude and in small water proportions. Preferably, terpene I is limonene terpene.
In one embodiment of the invention the compound optionally comprises one or more components selected from the group consisting of 8-14% urea, 3-8% sodium tripolyphosphate, 2-6% sodium sulphate, 3-6% liquid Genapol, and 1-4% of a quaternary salt.
The procedure for producing the compound of biodegradable surfactants of the present invention is also part of the claimed invention, and it comprises the following steps:
Among the multiple applications of this compound the following are worth mentioning: formation cleaning for eliminating particles or deposits of precipitates, incrustations and such processes that tend to limit crude flow in the porous layers near the borehole; the extraction of waxes and other precipitates from crude oil; enhancing physico-chemical properties of crude oil, such as viscosity, gravity, water content, etc., and stimulation of oil production. Furthermore, depending on the concentration used, the compound of the invention is applicable to different kinds of crude oil, reservoirs of crude oil with different API gravities, oil production columns, crude oil pipelines, cleaning of flow stations, of bitumen, greases, oily sands and oil spill sites both on land and off-shore, remediation of oily waste pits, treatment of drilling muds, animal and vegetation cleaning.
The amount to be prepared will be estimated according to the projected use of the compound, whether at surface level or within the reservoir. Before preparing the formula an assessment of the types of contaminants and concomitants to be removed should be realized so as to determine the compatibility and concentrations for mixing the components comprised by the present invention. The concentration of each component of the formula is established according to the acid-basic character that is desired for the reaction to obtain the desired effect on the crude oil.
The compound of biodegradable surfactants of the present invention was subject to different biodegradability tests at the Environmental Engineering Laboratory of the University of Zulia with the purpose of confirming if it could be used safely without causing harm to the environment and furthermore, to see that said compound will be degraded when said compound is used as a degreaser or for stimulation of unreactive wells. Results shown in
Additionally, Table 1 shows the results of analyses conducted following the method described in “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, 1999, 20th edition”, specifically by application of method 5210-B for determining the Biochemical Demand for Oxygen (mg/L) and method 5220-D for establishing the Chemical Demand for Oxygen (mg/L).
TABLE 1
Results of analyses
DBO5, mg/L
30000
DBO10, mg/L
45000
DBO15, mg/L
65000
DBO20, mg/L
85000
DBO28, mg/L
95000
DBO25, mg/L
100000
DQO, mg/L
249680
Rate DBO5, mg/L
0.1201
Rate DBO10, mg/L
0.1802
Rate DBO15, mg/L
0.2603
Rate DBO20, mg/L
0.3404
Rate DBO25, mg/L
0.3804
Rate DBO28, mg/L
0.4005
Discussion of the results: the information reported in Table 1 clearly indicates that the compound of the present invention is biodegradable since the amount of matter susceptible to oxidation by biological sources is high as evidenced by the fact that after five days of reaction the DBO5 was 30.000 mg/L and after 28 it increased to 100.000 mg/L.
A number of tests were conducted to establish the degree of toxicity of the compound of the present invention by determining its effect on fish in the Lake Maracaibo basin.
The method used for the toxicity test is the one described in “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, 1999, 20th edition. Basically the test consisted in running a toxicity bioassay to determine the lethal concentration of the compound of the present invention on the selected bioindicator. The calculated value is called “Mean Lethal Concentration (LC50) and it corresponds to the concentration that causes death of 50% of the experimental sample after a certain time. Tables 2 through 5 showing the results of these tests are hereon included:
TABLE 2
Concentration %
Control
10
25
50
75
100
pH
7.38
7.78
7.78
7.88
8.18
8.68
Dissolved oxygen ppm
4.06
5.06
5.09
4.98
4.60
4.58
Salinity (mg/L Cl*)
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Observations at the
Fish are restless. They swim normally both horizontally as well as
beginning of testing
vertically. They permanently reach to the surface.
TABLE 3
Number of survivors
10
10
10
10
9
9
(%) of Survivors
100
100
100
100
90
90
pH
7.86
8.07
7.98
8.01
8.03
7.89
Dissolved oxygen ppm
4.32
4.94
4.25
4.23
4.75
4.37
Observations during first
Dead fish were found at concentrations 75% & 100%; 1 and 1
24 hours of testing.
respectively. The rest of the fish in all concentrations swim
normally.
TABLE 4
Number of survivors
100
90
90
90
99
99
(%) of Survivors
100
90
90
90
90
90
pH
7.96
8.03
8.12
8.14
8.15
7.95
Dissolved oxygen ppm
4.43
4.88
4.96
5.02
4.89
4.74
Observations after 48
Again dead fish were found at concentrations 10%, 25% & 50%;
hours of testing.
1, 1 and 1 respectively. The rest of the fish in all concentrations
swim normally.
TABLE 5
Number of survivors
100
90
90
90
99
99
(%) of Survivors
100
90
90
90
90
90
pH
7.96
8.03
8.12
8.14
8.15
7.95
Dissolved oxygen ppm
4.43
4.88
4.96
5.02
4.89
4.74
Observations after 96
Again dead fish were found at concentrations 25%, 50%, 75% &
hours of testing.
100%; 1, 1, 1, 1 respectively and 1 in the control group. The rest
of the fish in all concentrations swim normally.
Likewise,
Time intervals
24 h
48 h
96 h
LC 50%
—
—
—
The procedure for sample preparation (recommended by the Venezuelan Institute of Crude Oil Technology—INTEVEP, in Spanish) comprises the following steps:
The method used for the toxicity test was the one described in “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, 20th edition, 1999, identified as Method number 8010.
Discussion of results: it was not possible to determine LC50 in the test because the product did not produce a mortality of 50%.
The results of the toxicity assays show that the product did not produce a toxic lethal effect on the live species used (Levistes). It is worth pointing out that during the test a survival level of between 80% and 100% was obtained in all concentrations until the end of testing. This leads to the conclusion that the compound of the present invention is a non-toxic product and represents a low environmental risk when used at the concentration that should be used for application according to the requesting party, i.e. 10%.
The compound of the present invention also has an agglutinant effect. To determine the degree of this effect an assay was run with the purpose of determining the agglutinant properties that allow cleaning and recovery of crude oil spills in Lake Maracaibo caused by leaks in the production systems. This assay also allowed the determination of the amount of crude extracted from the waters when the compounds of the present invention come in contact with water.
For this test oil spills were simulated in four (4) experimental units. For the assays 800 mL of water were used to which 4 mL of the compound of the invention were added at different doses (1, 5 and 10%), and an experimental unit to which no product was added was used as control. Finally, after ten (10) minutes and after two (2) hours the amount of crude in water was measured in each of the experimental units.
Analyses were conducted according to “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”. 20th Edition, 1999. The method specifically followed the parameters for Oils and Greases (mg/L) No. 5520-C. Results of the analyses conducted in the laboratory are shown in Tables 6 and 7.
TABLE 6
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSES
Samples
Oils and Greases
10 minutes after applying product
(mg/L)
Unit 1: Water with crude; no product applied
2.81
Unit 2: Water with crude; product applied at 1.0%
0.85
Unit 3: Water with crude; product applied at 5.0%
0.72
Unit 4: Water with crude; product applied at 10.0%
0.58
TABLE 7
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSES
Samples
Oils and Greases
2 hours after applying product
(mg/L)
Unit 1: Water with crude; no product applied
8.63
Unit 2: Water with crude; product applied at 1.0%
0.76
Unit 3: Water with crude; product applied at 5.0%
0.46
Unit 4: Water with crude; product applied at 10.0%
0.37
Discussion of results: results in Table 6 show that application of the compound of the present invention drastically reduces the concentration of oils and greases a few instants after adding the product at the different concentrations. Table 7 shows that after two hours in the experimental unit in which the product was not applied oils and greases have dissolved in a greater amount of water whereas in the units where the claimed compound was added no dispersion was observed and on the contrary, concentrations were lower than those seen 10 minutes after the addition of the product.
A SARA study (Saturates, Aromatics, Resins and Asphaltenes) was conducted to observe the effect of the claimed compound on a medium type crude from Eastern Zulia state. The study was done at the Institute of Petroleum Research of the University of Zulia (INPELUZ, acronym in Spanish). Table 8 reports water, sediments, and emulsion content of a sample taken from a canal that runs behind the tank station; no non-ionic surfactant was applied. Table 9 summarizes results of the SARA assessment of the original sample to identify its initial chemical properties.
TABLE 8
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGINAL SAMPLE
CON-
SEDIMENTS
WATER
TAINER
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
EMULSION
SAMPLE ID
(GALLON)
ASTMD 96
ASTM D96
(% v/v)
PDVSA-
1
1.00
16.00
12.00
Bachaquero
Strong
Tank station
TABLE 9
SARA ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGINAL SAMPLE
ASPHAL-
SATURATES
AROMATICS
RESINS
TENES
SAMPLE ID
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
PDVSA-
40.03
24.87
28.11
6.98
Bachaquero
Tank station
Table 10 reports water, sediments, and emulsion content of a sample taken from a canal that runs behind the tank station after applying the compound of non-ionic surfactant of the present invention, and Table 11 summarizes results of the SARA assessment of the crude mix with 5% of the claimed compound added to determine the chemical effects on the crude oil.
TABLE 10
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF THE TREATED SAMPLE
CON-
SEDIMENTS
WATER
TAINER
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
EMULSION
SAMPLE ID
(GALLON)
ASTMD 96
ASTM D96
(% v/v)
PDVSA-
1
3.00
16.00
0.00
Bachaquero
Tank station
TABLE 11
SARA ANALYSIS OF THE TREATED SAMPLE
ASPHAL-
SATURATES
AROMATICS
RESINS
TENES
SAMPLE ID
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
PDVSA-
40.36
32.04
22.04
4.90
Bachaquero
Tank station
Discussion of results: data in Tables 8-11 leads to the conclusion that the compound of the present invention completely breaks the emulsion. When the compound of the present invention is added the solids in the emulsion separate, as is clearly shown by the increase in sediment content.
Furthermore, results of the SARA chemical analyses (before and after treatment) show that by adding 5% of the claimed compound physico-chemical properties of the crude are enhanced on account of a substantial increase in aromatics, a fact that prevents precipitation of organic solids. It is evident that the application of this compound can break emulsions and separate organic and inorganic solids from the flow.
The multiple tests run with the compound of the present invention evidence the double effect it has on crude, both downhole and at surface level, as said compound performs as a friction reducer by encapsulating crude and thus preventing its direct contact with the production line, and as a viscosity reducer by enhancing the intrinsic properties of crude. Results of said tests are shown below:
TABLE 12
RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANALYSES
UNTREATED SAMPLE
Kinematic Viscosity @ 100° F. (CST)
7997.99
Kinematic Viscosity @ 180° F. (CST)
517.87
API gravity
10.8
Asphaltene content (% w/w)
10.32
Wax content (% w/w)
5.61
TREATED SAMPLE
Kinematic Viscosity @ 100° F. (CST)
1265.68
Kinematic Viscosity @ 180° F. (CST)
287.24
API gravity
12.80
Asphaltene content (% w/w)
6.32
Wax content (% w/w)
3.68
A similar test was run on a sample taken from a well in the Boscan field in the state of Zulia. The purpose was to observe the effect the biodegradable compound of the present invention had on the crude. Table 13 and
TABLE 13
RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANALYSES
KINEMATIC VISCOSITY (CST)
ASTM D-445
SAMPLE COMPOSITION
80° F.
120° F.
180° F.
Original crude BN-766
21720.14
3709.81
517.87
Crude + 5% of product
3988.87
1361.53
287.24
Discussion of results: data in the referred table and figure lead to the assertion that the claimed compound increases the value of API gravity as evidenced by the increase from 10.8° to 12.8° API after adding the compound in a concentration of 5% v/v, equivalent to 51571.20 ppm. Furthermore, viscosity was lowered in a high percentage going from 21720.14 cps to 3988.87 cps after adding the compound in a concentration of 5% v/v. The test was conducted at 80° F. Furthermore, the compound mixed very well with the crude.
For these tests a number of analyses were conducted in wells in the Bachaquero field, Zulia, to determine the effect of the compound on organic precipitates.
TABLE 14
ANALYSES OF UNTREATED SAMPLES
SAMPLE ID
WAXES (% w/w)
ASPHALTENES (% w/w)
B-2342 (22-07-03)
11.45
4.32
B-2360 (22-07-03)
6.57
2.94
B-2364 (22-07-03)
10.36
4.65
B-2397 (22-07-03)
5.31
5.23
B-2401 (23-07-03)
8.59
6.32
TABLE 15
ANALYSES OF TREATED SAMPLES
SAMPLE ID
WAXES (% w/w)
ASPHALTENES (% w/w)
B-2342 (22-07-03)
6.23
3.54
B-2360 (22-07-03)
3.96
2.66
B-2364 (22-07-03)
5.78
2.13
B-2397 (22-07-03)
3.24
3.99
B-2401 (23-07-03)
5.69
3.31
The following work was done by the company Biostar de Venezuela to determine the effect of the product on light oil from the center of Lake Maracaibo with the purpose in mind to use the product in the reservoir to stimulate production directly in wells. Results of these tests are shown in the following tables:
TABLE 16
ANALYSIS OF UNTREATED SAMPLE
Water
EMULSION
ASPHAL-
(% w/w)
STANDARD
TENES
WAXES
WELL
ASTM D-4007
(% v/v)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
CLA-0013
66.00
80.00 Strong
3.47
12.56
TABLE 17
ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE ADDING 20%
OF THE COMPOUND OF THE INVENTION
Water
EMULSION
ASPHAL-
(% w/w)
STANDARD
TENES
WAXES
WELL
ASTM D-4007
(% v/v)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
CLA-0013
66.00
0.00
3.36
4.64
Discussion of results: the tested sample contains a high concentration of wax as can be seen in Table 16. The high concentration of wax strengthens the emulsion and reduces the effectiveness of conventional demulsifiers. By adding the compound of the present invention the amount of wax decreased by 37% forcing emulsion break.
Following are the results of treating a crude sample from the Cumarebo field in northwestern Venezuela. The Cu-144 crude sample had an API gravity of 46.0°. The test was run to determine effects in reducing the emulsion present in the sample.
TABLE 18
ANALYSIS OF UNTREATED SAMPLE
SEDIMENTS
WATER
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
EMULSION POR
SAMPLE ID
ASTM D-96
ASTM D-96
(% v/v)
Cu-144(12-11-03)
0.00
22.00
35.00 Strong
TABLE 19
ANALYSIS OF TREATED SAMPLE
SEDIMENTS
WATER
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
EMULSION POR
SAMPLE ID
ASTM D-96
ASTM D-96
(% v/v)
Cu-144(12-11-03)
0.00
22.00
0.00
Discussion of results: the sample was subject to an emulsion analysis by centrifugation using 3% of the product. A quick reaction on the crude was observed and after centrifugation 100% of the emulsion had been broken.
A similar result was observed in the crude samples from Bachaquero, eastern Zulia. In that case the tests were run on samples of heavy and extra-heavy crudes. Results were excellent as shown in the following tables:
TABLE 20
ANALYSIS OF UNTREATED SAMPLE
SEDIMENTS
WATER
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
EMULSION POR
SAMPLE ID
ASTM D-96
ASTM D-96
(% v/v)
B-2342 (22-07-03)
0.00
18.00
24.00 Débil
B-2360 (22-07-03)
0.00
0.40
0.80 Fuerte
B-2364 (22-07-03)
0.00
38.00
76.00 Fuerte
B-2397 (22-07-03)
0.00
48.00
50.00 Fuerte
B-2401 (23-07-03)
0.00
96.00
12.00 Fuerte
TABLE 21
ANALYSIS OF TREATED SAMPLE
SEDIMENTS
WATER
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
EMULSION POR
SAMPLE ID
ASTM D-96
ASTM D-96
(% v/v)
B-2342 (22-07-03)
0.00
18.00
4.00 Débil
B-2360 (22-07-03)
0.00
0.40
2.80 Fuerte
B-2364 (22-07-03)
0.00
38.00
6.00 Débil
B-2397 (22-07-03)
0.00
48.00
0.00 Fuerte
B-2401 (23-07-03)
0.00
96.00
2.00 Fuerte
For this test, the physico-chemical characteristics of the samples were analyzed first and then it was decided to mix together samples from 8 different pits. The mix was divided into 5 parts and the product was applied at five different concentrations (3, 5, 10, 15 and 20%) to determine the effect on the pit sample and establish the possibility of using only one specific concentration. Results were that 3 of the 5 samples showed an effectiveness of 90-100% and the other 2 of 40%. Of the 3 samples with a 90-100% effectiveness only one was taken as a reference.
Next, pursuing the objectives set, it was decided to run complete analyses at the INPELUZ Maracaibo laboratories to establish the purity degree of the recoverable oil and thus discard any doubt on the possible consequences of incorporating the product to the pipeline carrying clean oil. The procedure developed by the INPELUZ Maracaibo laboratories follows bellow:
Following are the results obtained in the test:
Results:
A). With the composition reported in this application:
Water content:
15.30%
Solids:
0.70%
Oxidized organic precipitates:
10.0%
Crude content:
74%
B). With the Universal breaker:
Water content:
25.30%
Solids:
0.70%
Oxidized organic precipitates:
10.0%
Crude content:
64%
A shown by the above results the difference is that water content is 10% greater with the Universal breaker and the crude content is 10% greater without the Universal breaker.
To conclude, the recommendation is that in view of the results obtained and its compatibility with the chemical demulsifiers this crude can be injected in a pipeline leading to a point where it will be mixed with another crude.
Another case to highlight is the testing conducted on samples from crude oil pits in Maturin, Eastern Venezuela, by the company Biostar, where the compound of the present invention recovered organic as well as inorganic sediments. Recovered organic sediments are reinjected into the crude production line whereas the inorganic sediments and sand may be returned to the environment with no harm of any kind to Nature or man.
TABLE 22
ANALYSIS OF UNTREATED SAMPLE
Inorganic
Organic
Water
Emulsion
sediments
Sediments
(% w/w)
Standard
Well
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
ASTM D-4007
(% v/v)
OREO-5 pit,
0.40
0.45
13.00
10.00 Strong
MATURIN
TABLE 23
ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE WITH 2.5% OF
THE COMPOUND OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
Inorganic
Organic
Water
Emulsion
sediments
Sediments
(% w/w)
Standard
Well
(% v/v)
(% v/v)
ASTM D-4007
(% v/v)
OREO-5 pit,
0.00
0.25
13.50
5.00 Weak
MATURIN
It is important to mention the use of the compound of the present invention by the company BiPetrol as a matrix non-reactive stimulator in well Samaria-824 in Villahermosa, Mexico. Before injecting the claimed compound the well produced 27 barrels of crude oil per day with a water cut of 24.00% v/v. The injection aimed at undoing the harm present and promote the necessary conditions to increase production.
Labarca Finol, Osmerio Enrique, Reyes Lopez, Rixio Egardo
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4511488, | Dec 05 1983 | Penetone Corporation | D-Limonene based aqueous cleaning compositions |
5336428, | Jan 23 1990 | Nalco Chemical Company | Offshore rig cleaner |
5549839, | Apr 21 1995 | Industrial solvent based on a processed citrus oil for cleaning up petroleum waste products | |
5679628, | Jun 14 1996 | Arco Chemical Technology, L.P.; ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L P | Microemulsion cleaner compositions |
5811383, | Apr 02 1993 | The Dow Chemical Company | High water content, low viscosity, oil continuous microemulsions and emulsions, and their use in cleaning applications |
20050161372, | |||
20110272160, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 11 2017 | ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTS (ENDEVPRO) LIMITED | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 10 2023 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 18 2023 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Aug 18 2023 | M2554: Surcharge for late Payment, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 20 2022 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 2023 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 20 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 20 2026 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 2027 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 20 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 20 2030 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 2031 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 2031 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 20 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |