An alloy of GexSbySezTem includes atoms of Ge, Sb, Se, and Te that form a crystalline structure having a plurality of vacancies randomly distributed in the crystalline structure. The alloy can be used to construct an optical device including a first waveguide to guide a light beam and a modulation layer disposed on the first waveguide. The modulation includes the alloy of GexSbySezTem which has a first refractive index n1 in an amorphous state and a second refractive index n2, greater than the first refractive index by at least 1, in a crystalline state. The first waveguide and the modulation layer are configured to guide about 1% to about 50% of the light beam in the modulation layer when the alloy is in the amorphous state and guide no optical mode when the alloy is in the crystalline state.
|
1. An optical device comprising:
a first waveguide; and
a ring resonator evanescently coupled to the first waveguide, the ring resonator comprising:
a second waveguide forming a portion of the ring resonator; and
a GexSbySezTem (GSST) modulation layer disposed on the second waveguide, the GSST modulation layer being switchable between an amorphous state and a crystalline state, wherein atoms of Ge, Sb, Se, and Te form a crystalline structure having a plurality of vacancies randomly distributed in the crystalline structure when the GSST modulation layer is in the crystalline state.
20. An apparatus, comprising:
a first waveguide to guide a light beam; and
a ring resonator evanescently coupled to the first waveguide, the ring resonator comprising:
a second waveguide forming a portion of the ring resonator; and
a GexSbySezTem (GSST) modulation layer disposed on the second waveguide, the GSST modulation layer having a first refractive index n1 in an amorphous state and a second refractive index n2, greater than the first refractive index by at least 1, in a crystalline state,
wherein the second waveguide and the GSST modulation layer are configured to guide about 1% to about 50% of the light beam in the GSST modulation layer when the GSST modulation layer is in the amorphous state.
13. A method of modulating a light beam propagating in a ring resonator evanescently coupled to a first waveguide, the method comprising:
heating a GexSbySezTem (GSST) modulation layer, in optical communication with second waveguide forming a portion of the ring resonator, to a first temperature, the GSST modulation layer switchable between an amorphous state and a crystalline state, wherein the first temperature is greater than a phase transition temperature of the GSST modulation layer and less than about 100 degrees celsius above the phase transition temperature, and the heating causes the GSST modulation layer to switch between an amorphous state and a crystalline state, wherein atoms of Ge, Sb, Se, and Te form a crystalline structure having a plurality of vacancies randomly distributed in the crystalline structure when the GSST modulation layer is in the crystalline state.
2. The optical device of
3. The optical device of
4. The optical device of
5. The optical device of
6. The optical device of
7. The optical device of
8. The optical device of
9. The optical device of
10. The optical device of
comprises an input section to couple an input light beam into the ring resonator and an output section to propagate an output light beam out of the ring resonator.
11. The optical device of
12. The optical device of
the GSST modulation layer is configured to change a coupling ratio between the first waveguide and a second waveguide.
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. The method of
heating the GSST modulation layer to a second temperature greater than the first temperature; and
cooling the GSST modulation layer at a cooling rate substantially equal to or greater than about 105 degrees celsius per second so as to change the GSST modulation layer from the crystalline state to the amorphous state.
19. The method of
21. The apparatus of
22. The apparatus of
23. The apparatus of
24. The apparatus of
25. The apparatus of
26. The apparatus of
wherein the GSST modulation layer is configured to divert the light beam into the first waveguide when the GSST modulation layer is in the crystalline state.
|
This application claims the priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Application No. 62/478,717, filed Mar. 30, 2017, and entitled “GE—SB—SE—TE MATERIALS AND OPTICAL DEVICES INCORPORATING SAME,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. FA8702-15-D-0001 awarded by the U.S. Air Force. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Phase change materials (PCMs), such as GeSbTe (GST), are able to be switched between amorphous and crystalline states upon the application of an electrical pulse or a laser pulse. Their material properties, such as conductivity, bandgap, and refractive index, are distinct in the two states. Due to this property, PCMs have been widely used to construct electronic nonvolatile memories.
PCMs may also be used for constructing optical devices, which have a wide range of applications, such as sensing, imaging, and cognitive optical networks. For example, optical switching, i.e., dynamic routing of light into different paths, is widely used in photonic integrated circuits. Current on-chip optical switches are mostly based on electro-optical or thereto-optical effects, which usually produce small refractive index perturbations (e.g., typically well below 0.01). Therefore, the resulting devices often have a large footprint and significant energy consumption. In addition, switching mechanisms based on electro-optic or thereto-optical effects are volatile, so a continuous power supply is often used to maintain the optical switching state, thereby further increasing the energy consumption.
In recent years, optical devices based on PCMs have emerged for on-chip switching and routing. PCMs can generate a large difference in the refractive index during phase transition. In addition, a phase transition in a PCM can be nonvolatile, thereby allowing self-holding or latching in the resulting optical switches in the absence of power.
Despite these attractive features, the performance of existing PCM-based photonic switches is typically compromised by the high optical absorption in traditional PCMs. The two most commonly used PCMs include VO2 and Ge2Sb2Te5 (i.e., GST 225), both of which suffer from excessive optical losses even in their dielectric states. For example, the extinction coefficient (i.e., imaginary part of the refractive index) of amorphous GST is about 0.12 at 1550 nm wavelength, corresponding to about 42,000 dB/cm attenuation, which is unacceptably high for many guided-wave device applications.
Embodiments of the present technology generally relate to GSST materials and their applications in optical devices. In one example, an alloy of GexSbySezTem is disclosed and atoms of Ge, Sb, Se, and Te in the alloy form a crystalline structure having a plurality of vacancies randomly distributed in the crystalline structure.
In another example, a method of modulating a light beam propagating in a waveguide includes heating a modulation layer, in optical communication with the waveguide, to a first temperature. The modulation layer includes an alloy of GexSbySezTem switchable between an amorphous state and a crystalline state. The first temperature is greater than a phase transition temperature of the alloy and less than about 100 degrees Celsius above the phase transition temperature. The heating causes the alloy to form a crystalline structure having a plurality of vacancies randomly distributed in the crystalline structure.
In yet another example, an apparatus includes a first waveguide to guide a light beam and a modulation layer disposed on the first waveguide. The modulation includes an alloy of GexSbySezTem having a first refractive index n1 in an amorphous state and a second refractive index n2, greater than the first refractive index by at least 1, in a crystalline state. The first waveguide and the modulation layer are configured to guide about 1% to about 50% of the light beam in the modulation layer when the alloy is in the amorphous state.
It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. It should also be appreciated that terminology explicitly employed herein that also may appear in any disclosure incorporated by reference should be accorded a meaning most consistent with the particular concepts disclosed herein.
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings primarily are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; in some instances, various aspects of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may be shown exaggerated or enlarged in the drawings to facilitate an understanding of different features. In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to like features (e.g., functionally similar and/or structurally similar elements).
CSST Alloy
To address the challenges in conventional optical devices using phase change materials (PCMs), a new alloy of GexSbySezTem is engineered to have low optical loss in the optical and near infrared regime and a large difference in the refractive index greater than 1) for different phases or states. The alloy of GexSbySezTem includes four elements, germanium (Ge), antimony (Sb), selenium (Se), and tellurium (Te), and vacancies distributed among these atoms. The low optical loss can be attributed to the atomic structure of the alloy in its crystalline state, in which atoms of Ge, Sb, Se, and Te form a crystalline structure (i.e., ordered structure) while multiple vacancies are randomly distributed in the crystalline structure. To realize this atomic structure, an annealing step can be performed on the alloy in the amorphous state. The annealing temperature is within the window between the phase transition temperature of the alloy and about 100° C. above the phase transition temperature. Within this window, the annealing can cause the atoms of Ge, Sb, Se, and Te to form a crystalline structure without creating ordered distribution of vacancies. Without being bound by any particular theory or mode of operation, a disordered distribution of vacancies can introduce the Anderson-localization effect, which can localize the carriers and decrease the carrier mobility, thereby providing low free carrier loss.
For comparison,
The alloy GexSbySezTem described herein can include various compositions (e.g., different atomic percentages of each element). Selenium has a smaller atomic number than tellurium and is a good glass former. In generally, substituting Te with Se (e.g., in conventional GST) can increase the bandgap as well as decrease the optical loss of the resulting alloy.
In one example, x+y is about 0.4 to about 0.5 (e.g., about 0.4, about 0.42, about 0.44, about 0.46, about 0.48, or about 0.5, including any values and sub ranges in between), z is from about 0.1 to about 0.54 (e.g., about 0.1, about 0.2 about 0.3, about 0.4, about 0.5, about 0.52, or about 0.54, including any values and sub ranges in between), and x+y+z+m=1.
In another example, x can be less than 0.15 (e.g., about 0.15, about 0.14, about 0.13, about 0.12, about 0.11, about 0.1, about 0.08, about 0.06, about 0.04, or lower, including any values and sub ranges in between), y is about 0.5 to about 0.68 (e.g., about 0.5, about 0.52, about 0.54, about 0.56, about 0.58, about 0.6, about 0.62, about 0.64, about 0.66, or about 0.68, including any values and sub ranges in between), z is from about 0.05 to about 0.3 (e.g., about 0.05, about 0.1, about 0.15, about 0.2, about 0.25, or about 0.3, including any values and sub ranges in between), and x+y+z+m=1.
The compositions of the GexSbySezTem alloy can also be expressed in terms of atomic percentages. In general, a higher atomic percentage of Se can decrease the optical loss of the resulting alloy but may also slow down the crystallization process during phase transition. In practice, at least the following compositions can be used. In one example, the GexSbySezTem alloy can include about 0 to 50 at. % of Ge, about 0 to about 50 at. % of Sb, about 5 at. % to about at. 50% of Te, about 10 at. % to about 55% of Se, and the sum of atomic percentages of all elements in the alloy is 100 at. %.
In another example, the GexSbySezTem alloy can include about 0 at. % to about 15 at. % of Ge, about 50 at. % to about 70 at. % of Sb, about 2 at. % to about 30 at., of Te, about 5 at. % to about 30 at. % of Se, and the sum of atomic percentages of all elements in the alloy is 100 at. %.
In yet another example, the GexSbySezTem alloy can include about 0 at. % to about 45 at. % of Ge, about 0 at. % to about 50 at. % of Sb, about 5 at. % to about 45 at. % of Te, about 10 at. % to about 55 at. % of Se, and the sum of atomic percentages of all elements in the alloy is 100 at. %.
In yet another example, the GexSbySezTem alloy can include about 0 at. % to about 10 at. % of Ge, about 50 at. % to about 70 at. % of Sb, about 2 at. % to about 30 at. % of Te, and about 5 at. % to about 30 at. % of Se, and the sum of atomic percentages of all elements in the alloy is 100 at. %.
The GexSbySezTem alloy described herein can be characterized by various properties. For example, the phase change temperature Tc (also referred to as the transition temperature) of the alloy can be about 150° C. to about 400° C. (e.g., about 150° C., about 200° C., about 250° C., about 300° C., about 350° C., or about 400 DC, including any values and sub ranges in between) The phase change temperature Tc can also determine the annealing temperature that is used to transition the alloy from the amorphous state to the crystalline state. For example, the annealing temperature can be about Tc to about Tc+100° C. (e.g., about Tc, about Tc+20° C., about Tc+40° C., about Tc+60° C., about Tc+80° C., or about Tc±100° C., including any values and sub ranges in between).
The resistivity of the GexSbySezTem alloy (in amorphous state and crystalline state) can be substantially equal to or greater than about 1 Ω·cm (e.g., about 1 Ω·cm, about 2 Ω·cm, about 3 Ω·cm, about 5 Ω·cm, about 10 Ω·cm, or greater, including any values and sub ranges in between). Correspondingly, the conductivity of the GexSbySezTem alloy can be substantially equal to or less than about 1 S/cm (e.g., about 1 S/cm, about 0.5 S/cm, about 0.3 S/cm, about 0.2 S/cm, about 0.1 S/cm, or less, including any values and sub ranges in between). Higher resistivity corresponds to lower conductivity and can lead to lower free carrier absorption. Therefore, optical losses of the alloy is also lower.
The complex refractive index N of the GexSbySezTem alloy can be generally written as N=n+ik where n is the real part of the refractive index and k is the imaginary part of the refractive index (also referred to as the extinction coefficient throughout this Application). The alloy has distinct refractive indices N1 and N2 in the amorphous state and the crystalline state, respectively. More specifically, N1=n1+ik1, and N2=n2+ik2.
In optical devices, such as optical switches and modulators, it can be helpful to have a large difference between n1 and n2, also referred to as the refractive index difference Δn, so as to achieve more efficient modulation of light beams. The alloy GexSbySezTem described herein can provide a refractive index difference Δn greater than 1 (e.g., about 1, about 1.1, about 1.2, about 1.3, about 1.4, about 1.5, about 1.6, about 1.7, about 1.8, or greater, including any values and sub ranges in between) when it switches between phases.
The extinction coefficient k in the complex refractive index N usually determines the optical losses of GexSbySezTem. GexSbySezTem, in the crystalline state, can have an extinction coefficient k2 substantially equal to or less than 10−3 (e.g., about 10−3, about 5×10−4, about 10−4, about 5×10−5, or less, including any values and sub ranges in between). The extinction coefficient k1 of the alloy in the amorphous state is usually even smaller than k2. For example, the, k1 can be negligible in the mid-IR wavelengths and around 10−4 or less in telecomm wavelength (e.g. about 1260 nm to about 162 nm).
The impact of loss on the performance of optical devices is usually quantified using the material figure-of-merit FOM=Δn/k, where k is the extinction coefficient of the PCM in the crystalline state. This FOM is quantitatively correlated with the insertion loss (IL) and contrast ratio in all-optical, electro-optical, and magneto-optical devices. Conventional PCMs, such as VO2 and GST, usually have low FOMs of about 0.7 and 2.1, respectively, at 1550 nm. As a result, switches based on these materials have high ILs (e.g., about 2 dB or more) and limited crosstalk (e.g., less than about 15 dB in the C-band). As used herein, the crosstalk refers to the contrast ratio between the on/off states at the output ports (e.g., of an optical switch). In contrast, the alloy GexSbySezTem described herein can provide a high FOM due to the large refractive index change and the small extinction coefficient. For example, the FOM of the alloy GexSbySezTem can be substantially equal to or greater than 4 (e.g., about 4, about 5, about 10, about 20, about 30, about 50, about 100, about 200, about 300, about 500, about 1000, or greater, including any values and sub ranges in between).
Experimental Characterizations of GSST Alloy
Optical Devices Including GSST
The phase change materials described herein can be used in various types of optical devices, such as optical switches and modulators, due to their low losses in the optical regime. As shown in the characterizations above (e.g.,
Close inspection of the FOM reveals that its derivation builds on an underlying assumption: the material property modulation during the switching operation (i.e., phase transition) is sufficiently small such that perturbations to the optical mode comprise a high-order effect and are usually neglected. Under this condition, the modal overlap with the PCM can be characterized by a single parameter, i.e., the confinement factor Γ. Both the desired phase shift (induced by Δn) and the unwanted optical loss (imposed by k) scale with Γ. The small perturbation assumption applies to devices relying on traditional electro-optic, thermo-optic, all-optical, and magneto-optical mechanisms. Therefore, the performance of these devices is usually bound by the FOM, regardless of the specific device configuration (e.g., Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZIs), directional couplers (DCs), or micro-ring resonators).
The large optical property contrast between the two states in the alloy of GSST, however, permits different modal confinement factors in the two states. For example, the device can be engineered to have large modal confinement within the GSST layer when the GSST is in the low-loss amorphous state, and minimal optical field overlap with GSST when the GSST is switched to the crystalline state. This configuration is referred to as a “non-perturbative” design and can achieve low-loss, high-contrast modulation (e.g., switching) beyond the classical performance limits set forth by the material FOM.
The modulation layer 620 includes the GSST alloy described herein. A controller 640 can be used to switch the GSST alloy between the amorphous state and the crystalline state. In one example, the controller 640 includes a heat source to increase the temperature of the modulation layer to the annealing temperature (e.g., above the phase transition temperature but less than 100° C. above the phase transition temperature) so as to switch the GSST alloy into the crystalline state. In another example, the controller 640 can include a laser to heat the modulation layer 620 using optical pulses or beams. In the crystalline state, the modulation layer 620 may have some optical losses and the waveguide 610 can be configured to guide almost all the light beam (i.e., negligible propagation in the modulation layer 620).
The controller 640 is also able to further increase the temperature of the GSST alloy to be higher than the melting temperature of the alloy (e.g., about 600° C. or higher), followed by a fast cooling process, to switch the GSST alloy back to the amorphous state. The cooling rate can be, for example, about 105° C. per second or greater (e.g., about 105° C. per second, about 5×105° C. per second, about 106° C. per second, or greater, including any values and sub ranges in between). This high cooling rate can be achieved by, for example, reducing the thickness of the modulation layer 620. For example, the thickness of the modulation layer 620 can be about 1 mm or less (e.g., about 1 mm, about 500 μm, about 200 μm, about 100 μm, about 50 μm, about 20 μm, about 10 μm, about 5 μm, about 2 μm, about 1 μm, about 500 nm, about 200 nm, about 100 nm, or less, including any values and sub ranges in between).
Since GSST in the amorphous state has very low optical loss, part of the light beam can be guided in the modulation layer. For example, the modulation layer 620 can be configured to guide about 1% to about 50% of the optical power in the light beam (e.g., about 1%, about 2%, about 5%, about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, or about 50%, including any values and sub ranges in between). To facilitate the change of mode propagation induced by the phase transition of the GSST alloy, the refractive index of the waveguide 610 can be substantially identical to the refractive index of the modulation layer 620 in the amorphous state. When the GSST alloy transitions to the crystalline state, its refractive index can change by more than 1 and thus become very different from the refractive index of the waveguide 610. Accordingly, optical modes can be pushed out of the modulation layer 620 and confined within the waveguide 610.
In operation, a method of modulating a light beam propagating in the waveguide 610 includes heating the modulation layer 620 to a first temperature, which is greater than the phase transition temperature of the alloy and less than about 100 degrees Celsius above the phase transition temperature (i.e., between Tc and Tc+100° C., where Tc is the phase transition temperature). For example, the first temperature used in the annealing process can be about 200° C. to about 350° C. (e.g., about 200° C., about 250° C., about 300° C., or about 350° C., including any values and sub ranges in between). The heating process is also referred to as an annealing process and causes the alloy to form a crystalline structure having a plurality of vacancies randomly distributed in the crystalline structure. In one example, a heater can be used to increase the temperature of the modulation layer 620. In another example, a laser pulse can be used to increase the temperature of the modulation layer 620.
The device 600 shown in
The device 600 shown in
In operation, the system can be configured to allow only the odd modes (shown in
As illustrated in
During operation, when the GSST in the modulation layer 820 is amorphous, the phase matching condition between the two waveguides 810a and 810b is met. Accordingly, light launched into the first waveguide 810a (e.g., via the end 815 shown in
An example set of dimensions of the switch 900 can be as follows. The width wc of the second waveguide 910b can be about 512 nm. The widths ws of the first waveguide 910a and the third waveguide 910c can be about 730 nm. The width of the modulation layer wp can be about 400 nm. The spacing between adjacent waveguides wg can be about 562 nm. The heights of the three waveguides 910a to 910c can be about 450 nm and the height of the modulation layer 920 can be about 60 nm.
The working principle of the switch 900 can be illustrated using the supermode theory, where the three supermodes of the three waveguides 910a to 910c are approximated as linear combinations of the normalized individual waveguide modes (labeled as |1>, |2>, and |3> for the first waveguide 910a, the second waveguide 910b, and the third waveguide 910c, respectively):
It can be shown that complete power transfer (i.e., zero crosstalk) in the cross state (
The switch 900 also exhibits broadband switching capability across the C-hand as illustrated in
To elucidate the respective contributions to this exceptional performance from: (1) substitution of GST with GSST; and (2) the non-perturbative configurations of the switches 800 and 900, simulations were performed based on a GST alloy as well as a traditional MZI design. In the MZIs, one of the interferometer arms is loaded with a thin layer of PCM to induce a π phase shift upon crystallization. The power splitting ratios in the arms are chosen to balance the MZI arms when the PCM is in the amorphous state, which can maximize the CT. However, when the PCM is crystallized, its increased absorption results in power imbalance between the arms, compromising both the CT and IL. It can be shown that performance of MZI switches is defined by the classical FOM. Results in Table 1, which indicate that the combination of the GSST material and the non-perturbative configuration reaches the performance target, highlight the contribution from both material properties and the device configuration.
TABLE 1
Performance Comparison between Different
2 × 2 Switch Designs
Traditional MZI
Nonperturbative Design
GST
GSST
GST
GSST
IL (dB)
8.6
3.5
2.5
0.32
CT (dB)
−0.02
−6.1
−20
−32
The network 1000 uses the 2×2 switch as a building block and can be scaled to realize arbitrary network complexity levels. As an example,
The IL of the entire network can be computed by considering ILs from individual 2×2 switches on the optical path as well as loss due to waveguide crossings. The IL of a waveguide crossing is taken as 0.1 dB, which has been experimentally realized in the C-band. Because the 2×2 switch element has higher IL in the bar state (see, e.g.,
(2m−2)×0.1 dB+2m−1×0.32 dB (2)
An exemplary all-cross state path is I2m-O2m−1 and the corresponding IL is:
(3×2m-1−1−2m)×0.1 dB+(2m−1)×0.013 dB (3)
This IL is dominated by the waveguide crossing loss. The CT, defined as the ratio of transmitted power from the target output port over the maximum leaked power from a “nontarget” port, is estimated using the following formula at 1550 nm for a 2m×2m switch:
−(32 dB−10·log10 m dB) (4)
where −32 dB is the “worst-case” (bar state) CT for a 2×2 switch, and the second factor adds up leaked power from each switch stage.
During operation, the optical mode in the waveguide 1130 and the ring resonator 1110 is coupled into the modulation layer 1120. Therefore, the change in the refractive index and extinction ratio of the modulation layer 1120 can affect the relative mode property. As illustrated in
Methods of Manufacturing GSST Alloy and Depositing GSST Films
While various inventive embodiments have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments described herein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the inventive teachings is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.
Also, various inventive concepts may be embodied as one or more methods, of which an example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with “and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B”, when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” can refer, in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements); etc.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e., “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or “exactly one of.” “Consisting essentially of,” when used in the claims, shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “at least one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) can refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.
In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.
Hu, Juejun, Gu, Tian, Li, Junying, Zhang, Yifei, Fang, Zhuoran
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11803011, | Apr 12 2022 | EAGLE TECHNOLOGY, LLC | Optical switch having latched switch states and associated methods |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6177166, | Nov 17 1997 | MITSUBISHI KAGAKU MEDIA CO , LTD | Optical information recording medium |
6858277, | Mar 15 1999 | Panasonic Corporation | Information recording medium and method for manufacturing the same |
20040027646, | |||
20070108430, | |||
20100226163, | |||
20110069540, | |||
20110273756, | |||
20140203235, | |||
20150029775, | |||
20150378183, | |||
WO2016123088, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 30 2018 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 02 2018 | LI, JUNYING | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045816 | /0251 | |
Apr 05 2018 | FANG, ZHUORAN | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045816 | /0251 | |
Apr 24 2018 | ZHANG, YIFEI | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045816 | /0251 | |
May 06 2018 | GU, TIAN | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045816 | /0251 | |
May 06 2018 | HU, JUEJUN | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045816 | /0251 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 30 2018 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Apr 25 2018 | SMAL: Entity status set to Small. |
Oct 30 2023 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 28 2023 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 28 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 28 2024 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 28 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 28 2027 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 28 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 28 2028 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 28 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 28 2031 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 28 2031 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 28 2032 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 28 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |