The invention described herein pertains generally to a process for making boric acid free flux compositions in which boric acid and/or borax is substituted with a molar equivalent amount of potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate. In some embodiments, a phthalocyanine pigment is used to affect a color change at activation temperature.
|
1. A process of making a boric acid-free flux composition, the process comprising: combining water, potassium bifluoride, a fumed silica, potassium tetraborate and potassium fluoroborate.
2. The process of
3. The process of
4. The process of
5. The process of
6. The process of
7. The process of
the wetting agent in the amount of 0.1-1 weight %;
potassium bifluoride in the amount of 12-16 weight %;
the fumed silica in the amount of 0.1-4 weight %;
potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate in the amount of 26-35 weight
potassium fluoroborate in the amount of 26-35 weight %;
the pigment in the amount of 0.1-2 weight %; and
water in the amount of balance.
8. The process of
the wetting agent in the amount of 0.1-1 weight %;
potassium bifluoride in the amount of 12-16 weight %;
the fumed silica in the amount of 0.1-4 weight %;
potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate in the amount of 26-35 weight %;
potassium fluoroborate in the amount of 26-35 weight %;
boron in the amount of 0.1-2 weight %; and
water in the amount of balance.
9. The process of
potassium bifluoride in the amount of 12-16 weight %;
the fumed silica in the amount of 0.1-4 weight %;
potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate in the amount of 26-35 weight %; and
potassium fluoroborate in the amount of 26-35 weight %.
10. The process of
12. The process of
13. The process of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application is a divisional of pending U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 14/211,125, filed on Mar. 14, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 13/838,485, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,174,310 on Nov. 3, 2015, each of which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
The invention described herein pertains generally to boric acid free brazing flux compositions.
In general, brazing fluxes remove oxides and contaminants from base materials to ensure good quality brazed joints. The choice of flux depends on the base material to be used, in addition to the filler metal types, heat source, and application method. Brazing joins similar and dissimilar materials by heating them in the presence of filler metal having a liquidus above 425° C.-450° C. (˜800° F.-840° F.) and below the solidus of the base material. During brazing, filler metal flows between fitted surfaces of the joint by capillary action. The minimum temperature on the surface of the component to be brazed at which said process takes place undisturbed is the so-called working temperature. It is a characteristic quantity for the filler metal in question. Filler metals can be alloys or pure metals. In general, the heat from brazing is less damaging than the heat from welding. Additionally, brazed joints typically have higher strength than soft-soldered joints. The choice of flux plays an important role in most all brazing processes, and the use of an incorrect flux can compromise joint quality.
In order to be able to form a bond with the base metal, the molten filler metal must come into direct contact with the base metal. Oxide layers of the kind present on any engineering metal surface must thus be loosened first and removed. If brazing takes place in the air, this is achieved by covering the brazing site with fluxes in the melt flow in which the oxides dissolve, are reduced or decompose at and above the active temperature of the flux.
When heated, fluxes dissolve surface oxides and protect the cleaned surfaces from re-oxidation, transfer heat from the heat source to the joint, and remove oxidation products, allowing filler metal to contact and wet the base materials. Brazing fluxes, pastes or powders, activate at temperatures below those needed to melt filler metals. Because fluxes must be in close contact with the joint surfaces, they are liquid or gaseous at brazing temperatures. They remove only surface oxides and tarnish. Other contaminants must be removed either mechanically or chemically before brazing.
Fluxes are typically classified by form (powder, liquid, or paste), base materials and filler metals they can be used with, heat source, application method, and active temperature range. Silver brazing fluxes contain boric acid and potassium borates, combined with complex potassium fluoroborate and fluoride compounds. Fluorides, up to 40% in flux content, give these fluxes their characteristically low melting points and high capacity for dissolving metal oxides. High temperature fluxes, based on boric acid and alkaline borates, sometimes, contain small additions of elemental boron or silicon dioxide to increase activity and protection.
The melting point and the effective temperature of the fluxes must be matched to the working temperature of the brazing filler metal used, whereby the flux should melt at about 50-100° C. below the working temperature of the filler metal used and become fully effective from this temperature onwards. Moreover, the molten flux should form a dense, uniform coating on the workpiece which remains intact at the required brazing temperature and for the duration of the brazing period.
Assuming pure metal surfaces, the liquid filler metal is able to spread in a thin layer on the base metal surface, wetting it. The filler metal adheres to the base metal surface by a slight alloying of the base and filler metals. The filler metal spreads out over the joint surface and, after solidifying, forms a loadable joint with the base metal.
Brazing fluxes are composed substantially of salt mixtures which, in the molten state, are capable of dissolving metal oxides. These fluxes are substantially inorganic boron compounds such as, in particular, alkali borates and fluoroborates, including boric acid, and halides such as, in particular, an alkali halide; e.g. alkali fluorides.
Per the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures” boric acid (a component of most brazing fluxes), is classified as a reproductive toxin in the European Union. This requires special labeling, leading to an effort on the part of consumers to look for boric acid free alternatives. Suitable boric acid free brazing fluxes must be developed to maintain market share and meet consumer demand.
At least one aspect of the invention resides in the superior ability to achieve desirable flux characteristics without the presence of boric acid (H3BO3) or borax (NaB4O5(OH)4.H2O) in the flux.
The invention describes various flux compositions which do not contain boric acid, and which optionally include a color change pigment at activation temperature, e.g., a phthalocyanine pigment.
In one embodiment, a boric acid free paste flux composition is described that contains: water; potassium bifluoride (KHF2); fumed silica (SiO2); potassium tetraborate (K2B4O7.4H2O); and potassium fluoroborate (KBF4).
For high temperature applications, the boric acid free paste flux composition often contains boron.
For low temperature applications, one embodiment of the boric acid free paste flux composition contains on a weight percent basis: water (balance to total 100%); a wetting agent, preferably UDYLITE 62 (0.1-1%); potassium bifluoride (KHF2) (12-16%); fumed silica (SiO2) (0.1-4%); potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate (K2B4O7.4H2O) (26-35%); potassium fluoroborate (KBF4) (26-35%); and pigment (phthalocyanine) (0.1-2%).
For high temperature applications, another embodiment of the boric acid free paste flux composition contains on a weight percent basis: water (balance to total 100%); wetting agent, preferably UDYLITE 62 (0.1-1%); potassium bifluoride (KHF2) (12-16%); fumed silica (SiO2) (0.1-4%); potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate (K2B4O7.4H2O) (26-35%); potassium fluoroborate (KBF4) (26-35%); and boron (0.1-2%).
For powder applications, the boric acid free powder flux composition includes: potassium tetraborate (K2B4O7.4H2O); potassium fluorosilicate (K2SiF6); and potassium fluoroborate (KBF4).
For high temperature applications, the boric acid free powder flux will contain boron.
For high temperature applications, one embodiment of the boric acid free powder flux composition will include on a weight basis: potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate (K2B4O7.4H2O) (44-54%); potassium fluorosilicate (K2SiF6) (1-3%); potassium fluoroborate (KBF4) (44-54%); and boron (0.1-2%).
For low temperature applications, another embodiment of the boric acid free powder flux composition will include on a weight basis: potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate (K2B4O7.4H2O) (44-54%); potassium fluorosilicate (K2SiF6) (1-3%); potassium fluoroborate (KBF4) (44-54%); and pigment (phthalocyanine) (0.1-2%).
The invention includes a process of making a boric acid free flux which comprises the step of replacing boric acid present in a boric acid containing flux with a substantially similar molar amount of potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate (K2B4O7.4H2O). The process optionally also includes the step of adding a phthalocyanine pigment effects a color change at an activation temperature of said flux.
The invention further includes a process of making a boric acid free flux which comprises the step of: replacing borax present in a borax containing flux with a substantially similar molar amount of potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate (K2B4O7.4H2O). The process optionally also includes the step of adding a phthalocyanine pigment effects a color change at an activation temperature of said flux.
These and other objects of this invention will be evident when viewed in light of the detailed description and appended claims.
The best mode for carrying out the invention will now be described for the purposes of illustrating the best mode known to the applicant at the time of the filing of this invention. The examples are illustrative only and not meant to limit the invention, as measured by the scope and spirit of the claims.
As used herein, the term “approximately” or “about” means within the stated ranges with a tolerance of 10%.
The present brazing flux composition is boric acid free, provides good wetting characteristics and changes color from a color in the visible spectrum to clear at activation temperature.
The invention will now be described in a series of non-limiting, but illustrative examples.
Boric acid has a melting temperature of approximately 336° F. (169° C.) and melts early during heating in the brazing process. This allows boric acid brazing fluxes to begin melting at low temperatures, well before brazing temperature is reached, thereby protecting the faying surfaces from further oxidation. Additionally, this low melting temperature, coupled a boiling/dehydration temperature of approximately 532° F. (300° C.) helps to create brazing fluxes that hot rod well, that is to say that the flux will melt, then subsequently freeze, adhering to heated brazing rod. By the time boric acid reaches 842° F. (450° C.) it completely dehydrates (or decomposes releasing H2O) leaving boron trioxide, which protects the base and filler metal surfaces throughout the remaining brazing process. Replacing boric acid in a brazing flux requires the substitution of the boric acid with one or more compounds that can approximately duplicate the above properties.
Several compounds have attributes which would lend themselves to a boric acid replacement. These options would include, at a minimum: a combination of potassium carbonate and di-ammonium phosphate; and ammonium fluoroborate or ammonium fluorosilicate and potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate. In general, sodium salts were not considered as a likely replacement due in large part to the “sodium glare” encountered when heated to brazing temperatures. In addition, sodium-borate salts were further removed from consideration because they are specified in EU “regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures” as having the same restrictions and boric acid.
Potassium carbonate offers protection at temperatures exceeding 1600° F. (871° C.); and combining potassium carbonate with diammonium phosphate (DAP) would allow protection from oxidation above 302° F. (150° C.). However, while meeting some of the replacement criteria, it was determined that this combination was not practical for a dry powdered flux due to the deliquescence of potassium carbonate, the tendency of the flux to absorb moisture. The high dissociation partial pressure of ammonia from DAP require that the flux remain in a tightly sealed container when it is not in use, to preserve flux chemical and physical properties. The release of ammonia is also an issue with the ammonia fluoroborate and fluorosilicate; the release of ammonia is exacerbated when the paste flux is made due to the ready dissociation of ammonia from its anionic counterparts in an aqueous solution, though water gain is not an issue. Although these flux formulations yield an adequate performance, better alternatives were pursued based on at least two factors: (1) the unpleasant ammonia fume, from flux application to heating; and (2) the probable change in flux properties through hygroscopic update over time.
Potassium tetraborate is also found in brazing fluxes. It readily dissolves metallic (not refractory) oxides at high temperature almost as well as potassium pentaborate (also another replacement option) at a fraction of the cost. It was selected as an option to consider in the replacement of boric acid. Anhydrous potassium tetraborate alone does not melt until 1500° F. (816° C.) and is hygroscopic, converting to the tetrahydrate with prolonged exposure to humidity. Hydration of powdered anhydrous potassium tetraborate fluxes causes an uncontrolled change in flux properties over time and imposes unnecessary conditions and/or processing during manufacture. Hydration is an exothermic process that causes manufacturing concerns. While anhydrous powdered potassium tetraborate flux does perform adequately, the flux does not melt until the faying surface is hot enough to form additional oxides, which will subsequently need to be removed. Additionally this flux will not “hot rod” well due to the high melting temperature. For all of these reasons potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate was chosen as a preferred replacement over anhydrous potassium tetraborate as a boric acid substitute.
The invention will now be described by a series of non-limiting examples.
In one embodiment of the invention, a black high temperature paste flux is described, the composition of which includes a mixture of water, potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate, potassium bifluoride, boron, UDYLITE (Udylite 62 is a product of Enthone®, 350 Frontage Road, West Haven, Conn.) and fumed silica in the following weight percentages.
TABLE I
High Temperature Boric Acid Free Paste Flux
Weight
Component
Percentage
water
balance
wetting agent
0.1-1%
wetting agent/surfactant
(UDYLITE 62)
potassium bifluoride
12-16%
etchant/clean base metal surface
(KHF2)
fumed silica (SiO2)
0.1-4%
emulsifying agent/plasticizer
potassium tetraborate
26-35%
dissolve metallic oxides and protect
tetrahydrate
brazing surface from oxidation
(K2B4O7•4H2O)
potassium fluoroborate
26-35%
dissolve metallic oxides and halides
(KBF4)
and protect brazing surface from
oxidation
boron
0.1-2%
protect surface from oxidation at high
brazing temperatures
Total
100%
(all components will total 100%)
In another embodiment of the invention, a low temperature boric acid free paste flux will include a mixture of water, potassium bifluoride, potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate, potassium fluoroborate, pigment, UDYLITE and fumed silica in the following weight percentages.
TABLE II
Low Temperature Boric Acid Free Paste Flux
Weight
Component
Percentage
water
balance
wetting agent
0.1-1%
wetting agent/surfactant
(UDYLITE 62)
potassium bifluoride
12-16%
etchant/clean base metal surface
(KHF2)
fumed silica (SiO2)
0.1-4%
emulsifying agent/plasticizer
potassium tetraborate
26-35%
dissolve metallic oxides and protect
tetrahydrate
brazing surface from oxidation
(K2B4O7•4H2O)
potassium fluoroborate
26-35%
dissolve metallic oxides and halides
(KBF4)
and protect brazing surface from
oxidation
pigment (phthalo-
0.1-2%
active temperature indicator
cyanine)
Total
100%
(all components will total 100%)
Copper Phthalocyanine Green No. 7 was employed in several compositions as a visual indicator of activation temperature. It decomposes in the range of temperature form 1022° F. (550° C.) to 1650° F. (900° C.), depending on the level of accessible oxidizing agents. Testing revealed reliable correlation between the color change of the low temperature (green) brazing fluxes from green to clear and brazing temperature, at the faying surfaces. Furthermore this color change did not appear to be dependent on the level of pigmentation.
In another embodiment of the invention, a high temperature boric acid free powder flux will include a mixture of potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate, potassium fluorosilicate, potassium fluoroborate and boron in the following weight percentages.
TABLE III
High Temperature Boric Acid Free Powder Flux
Weight
Component
Percentage
potassium tetraborate
44-54%
dissolve metallic oxides and protect
tetrahydrate
brazing surface from oxidation
(K2B4O7•4H2O)
potassium fluoro-
1-3%
wetting agent/surfactant
silicate (K2SiF6)
potassium fluoroborate
44-54%
dissolve metallic oxides and halides
(KBF4)
and protect brazing surface from
oxidation
boron
0.1-2%
protect surface from oxidation at high
brazing temperatures
Total
100%
(all components will total 100%)
In another embodiment of the invention, a low temperature boric acid free powder flux will include a mixture of potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate, potassium fluorosilicate, potassium fluoroborate and a pigment in the following weight percentages.
TABLE IV
Low Temperature Boric Acid Free Powder Flux
Weight
Component
Percentage
potassium tetraborate
44-54%
dissolve metallic oxides and protect
tetrahydrate
brazing surface from oxidation
(K2B4O7•4H2O)
potassium fluoro-
1-3%
wetting agent/surfactant
silicate (K2SiF6)
potassium fluoroborate
44-54%
dissolve metallic oxides and halides
(KBF4)
and protect brazing surface from
oxidation
pigment (phthalo-
0.1-2%
active temperature indicator
cyanine 500-600° C.)
Total
100%
(all components will total 100%)
As described above, the phthalocyanine pigment is an aromatic macrocyclic compound that forms coordination complexes with many elements of the periodic table. These complexes are intensely colored which facilitates the color transformation at temperatures employed in the reaction. As described above, the phthalocyanine pigment is an aromatic macrocyclic compound that forms coordination complexes with many elements of the periodic table. These complexes are intensely colored which facilitates the color transformation at temperatures employed in the reaction from colored in the visible spectrum to essentially colorless at temperature. The phthalocyanine macrocyclic compound is illustrated below, and wherein a metallic ion would be coordination bonded to the nitrogen atoms, typically within the 5-membered rings.
##STR00001##
The above compositions are useful for the brazing of metallic materials based on copper, silver, nickel and iron based alloys. Without being held to any one theory or mechanism of operation, the flux is used to remove the oxide layer and enable the wetting of the base materials. The activated flux creates a layer on the workpiece and removes any surface oxides. The color change at activation temperature is a distinct characteristic not seen when compared to fluxes commercially available for purchase.
Compositions and combinations of the above fluxes were tested and met all AWS A5.31M/A5.31:2012 testing standards for water content, particle, adhesion, fluidity, fluxing action, flow, life and viscosity.
The boric acid free fluxes described in Tables I-IV deliver excellent performance, standing on their own as brazing fluxes. As discussed below, the boric acid free fluxes deliver results often superior to commercially available standard fluxes that are not boric acid free.
In addition, the following tests were performed on an additional series of fluxes synthesized using the compositions identified in Tables 1-6 with the performance criteria identified and defined below being characterized in Tables 1a-6a.
All of the boric acid free fluxes dissolved all oxides from the base metal surface.
All of the boric acid free fluxes are fully active, removing oxides, throughout the range of 1050° F.-1600° F. (566° C.-871° C.) and 1050° F.-1800° F. (566° C.-982° C.), for the low temperature (green) flux and the high temperature flux (black) respectively.
“Hot Rodding” is the coating of a piece of brazing rod (filler metal) by dipping a hot end into a powdered flux. This is applicable to powder fluxes only. Both powder fluxes “hot rodded” extremely well.
A flowability test was performed per AWS A5.31M/A5.31:2012. Flowability was good for both the boric acid free powders and the pastes.
There was very little objectionable odor and fumes throughout the brazing process for all of the boric acid free fluxes.
The pigmented fluxes of Tables 2 & 4 were the only fluxes that had a visual indicator of activation temperature actually tested.
In judging the performance of brazing flux formulations seven criteria were chosen:
Each criterion is evaluated for the flux formulation as having a subjective value between one and five, where 1 (one) is “not desirable” and 5 (five) is “desirable”.
In the following examples, testing was performed on eight powdered and three paste flux test formulations of varying components and/or combined in varying ratios. Of these formulations six contained boric acid to establish several benchmarks. SSP-4 was chosen as our baseline for powdered flux (Tables 1 & 1a) and SSWF as the baseline for the paste flux (Tables 2 & 2a). None of the initial testing was for boron-containing (high temperature) fluxes. The assumption was made that a successful low temperature flux can be used as a basis for a high temperature flux. Experience with prior art compositions bear this out. Furthermore, the green phthalocyanine pigment was not included in the functional tests of the low temperature fluxes, as it is present in levels deemed too low to be of any significance to the performance of the flux, other than to provide visual indication to the operator.
TABLE 1
Composition (% mass)
Test No
NH4BF4
(NH4)2SiF6
H3BO3
C6H8O7
K2SiF6
(NH4)2PO4
K2CO3
KBF4
KF
K2B4O7•4H2O
SSP-1
—
—
—
—
22
5
9
64
—
—
SSP1-a
—
—
—
—
21
6
10
63
—
—
SSP1-b
—
—
—
—
22
12
13
53
—
—
SSP-f
—
—
5
22
—
—
9
64
—
—
SSP-16
—
10
—
—
30
10
20
—
30
—
SSP-28
10
10
—
—
—
—
—
60
—
20
SSP-6
—
—
15
5
20
—
10
50
—
—
SSP-4
—
—
20
—
10
—
10
50
—
—
TABLE 1a
Base
Hot
Flux
Metal
Acrid
Flux
Flux
Hot
Test No
Metal
Rod
Flow
Flow
Odor
Comp
Residue
Clean
SSP-1
Copper
1
4
3
2
5
4
5
Stainless
1
3
3
2
5
4
5
SSP1-a
Copper
1
3
3
2
5
4
5
Stainless
1
3
3
2
5
4
5
SSP1-b
Copper
1
3
4
1
4
3
4
Stainless
1
3
3
2
4
3
4
SSP-f
Copper
2
3
3
2
3
3
5
Stainless
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
SSP-16
Copper
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
Stainless
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
SSP-28
Copper
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
Stainless
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
SSP-6
Copper
3
5
3
2
5
4
5
Stainless
3
5
3
2
5
4
5
SSP-4
Copper
4
5
3
3
5
4
5
Stainless
4
5
3
3
5
4
5
TABLE 2
Composition (% mass)
Udylite
Test
Copper
No
H3BO3
Wetting
(NH4)2PO4
KHF2
K2CO3
KBF4
KF
Water
SSP-
10
20
10
10
20
30
—
Bal-
11
ance
SSP-
20
20
10
10
20
—
20
Bal-
12
ance
SSWF
41
0.03
—
18
—
—
18
Bal-
ance
TABLE 2a
Base
Hot
Flux
Metal
Acrid
Flux
Flux
Hot
Test No
Metal
Rod
Flow
Flow
Odor
Comp
Residue
Clean
SSP-11
Copper
N/A
4
3
3
5
4
5
Stainless
N/A
4
3
3
5
4
5
SSP-12
Copper
N/A
5
3
2
5
4
5
Stainless
N/A
5
3
2
5
4
5
SSWF
Copper
N/A
5
3
4
5
4
5
Stainless
N/A
5
3
4
5
4
5
Potassium tetraborate is a common component in brazing fluxes. It readily dissolves metallic (not refractory) oxides at high temperature; this makes it a natural consideration for replacement of boric acid; for these reasons it was actually the chemical of first choice. Anhydrous potassium tetraborate alone does not melt until 1500° F. (816° C.) and is hygroscopic, converting to the tetrahydrate with prolonged exposure to humidity. Hydration of powdered anhydrous potassium tetraborate fluxes causes an uncontrolled change in flux properties over time and imposes unnecessary conditions and/or processing during manufacture. Hydration is an exothermic process that causes manufacturing concerns. While anhydrous powdered potassium tetraborate flux does perform adequately, the flux does not melt until the faying surface is hot enough to form some additional oxides, which will subsequently need to be removed; additionally this flux will not “hot rod” well due to the high melting temperature. For these reasons potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate was chosen as a preferred embodiment over anhydrous potassium tetraborate. Boric acid in both the powder and paste fluxes was replaced with potassium tetraborate tetrahydrate. This replacement was approximately a 1:1 molar ratio of borate content for both fluxes initially, and then adjusted against the wetting agent(s) to achieve the optimal performance.
TABLE 3
Composition (% mass)
Test No
K2SiF6
KBF4
K2B4O7•4H2O
SSP-2
18
57
25
SSP2-a
18
52
30
SSP2-b
20
40
40
SSP2-c
14
43
43
SSP2-d
10
45
45
SSP2-e
8
46
46
SSP2-f
6
47
47
SSP2-g
2
49
49
TABLE 3a
Base
Hot
Flux
Metal
Acrid
Flux
Flux
Hot
Test No
Metal
Rod
Flow
Flow
Odor
Comp
Residue
Clean
SSP-2
Copper
2
4
4
2
5
4
5
Stainless
2
3
3
2
5
4
5
SSP2-a
Copper
2
4
4
2
5
4
5
Stainless
2
3
3
2
5
4
5
SSP2-b
Copper
2
4
4
2
5
4
5
Stainless
2
3
3
2
5
4
5
SSP2-c
Copper
2
4
4
2
5
4
5
Stainless
2
3
3
2
5
4
5
SSP2-d
Copper
3
4
4
2
5
4
5
Stainless
3
3
4
2
5
4
5
SSP2-e
Copper
3
4
4
3
5
4
5
Stainless
3
3
4
3
5
4
5
SSP2-f
Copper
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
Stainless
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
SSP2-g
Copper
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
Stainless
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
TABLE 4
Composition (% mass)
Test No
Boron
K2SiF6
KBF4
K2B4O7•4H2O
SSP2-h
5
5
50
40
SSP2-i
4
6
48
42
SSP-j
3
3
46
46
SSP-k
2
3
47
47
SSP-l
2
3
48
48
SSP-m
1
3
48
48
TABLE 4a
Base
Hot
Flux
Metal
Acrid
Flux
Flux
Hot
Test No
Metal
Rod
Flow
Flow
Odor
Comp
Residue
Clean
SSP2-h
Copper
1
2
3
3
5
3
5
Stainless
1
2
3
3
5
2
4
SSP2-i
Copper
2
2
3
3
5
3
5
Stainless
2
2
3
3
5
2
4
SSP-j
Copper
3
2
3
3
5
3
5
Stainless
3
2
4
3
5
3
5
SSP-k
Copper
3
3
3
3
5
4
5
Stainless
3
3
4
3
5
3
5
SSP-l
Copper
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
Stainless
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
SSP-m
Copper
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
Stainless
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
TABLE 5
Composition (% mass)
Udylite
Fumed
Copper
Test No
SiO2
Wetting
KHF2
KBF4
K2B4O7•4H2O
Water
SSP-48
2
1
23
23
28
Balance
SSP48-A
2
1
20
23
30
Balance
SSP48-B
1
0.75
15
30
31
Balance
SSP-C
1
0.05
15
32
32
Balance
SSP-D
1
0.5
14
32
32
Balance
TABLE 5a
Base
Hot
Flux
Metal
Acrid
Flux
Flux
Hot
Test No
Metal
Rod
Flow
Flow
Odor
Comp
Residue
Clean
SSP-48
Copper
N/A
2
3
2
4
4
3
Stainless
N/A
2
2
2
4
4
3
SSP48-a
Copper
N/A
3
3
2
4
4
4
Stainless
N/A
2
3
2
4
4
4
SSP48-b
Copper
N/A
3
3
2
4
4
4
Stainless
N/A
3
3
2
4
4
4
SSP-c
Copper
N/A
4
4
3
4
4
5
Stainless
N/A
4
3
3
4
4
5
SSP-d
Copper
N/A
5
5
4
5
4
5
Stainless
N/A
5
5
4
5
4
5
TABLE 6
Composition (% mass)
Udylite
Test
Fumed
Copper
No
Boron
SiO2
Wetting
KHF2
KBF4
K2B4O7•4H2O
Water
SSP-
4
2
2
25
38
28
Bal-
50
ance
SSP50-
3
2
2
23
36
29
Bal-
a
ance
SSP50-
2
1
1
17
35
30
Bal-
b
ance
SSP50-
1
1
0.75
15
33
31
Bal-
c
ance
SSP50-
1
1
0.5
14
32
32
Bal-
d
ance
TABLE 6a
Base
Hot
Flux
Metal
Acrid
Flux
Flux
Hot
Test No
Metal
Rod
Flow
Flow
Odor
Comp
Residue
Clean
SSP-50
Copper
N/A
3
3
2
4
4
4
Stainless
N/A
2
3
2
4
4
4
SSP50-a
Copper
N/A
3
3
3
4
4
4
Stainless
N/A
3
3
3
4
4
4
SSP50-b
Copper
N/A
4
4
3
4
4
5
Stainless
N/A
3
4
3
4
4
4
SSP50-c
Copper
N/A
4
5
4
5
4
5
Stainless
N/A
4
4
4
5
4
5
SSP50-d
Copper
N/A
5
5
4
5
4
5
Stainless
N/A
5
5
4
5
4
5
The invention has been described with reference to preferred and alternate embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon the reading and understanding of the specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10058957, | Mar 15 2013 | Lincoln Global, Inc | Boric acid free flux |
| 2197458, | |||
| 3471268, | |||
| 5171376, | Jun 12 1990 | Laporte Industries Limited | Fluxes for aluminium brazing or welding |
| 6183883, | Jun 19 1997 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Brazing or soldering material and manufacturing method therefor |
| 6613159, | May 08 1999 | Umicore AG & Co KG | Flux for brazing difficult to wet metallic materials |
| 9174310, | Mar 15 2013 | Lincoln Global, Inc | Boric acid free flux |
| 9700964, | Mar 15 2013 | Lincoln Global, Inc | Boric acid free flux |
| 20020020468, | |||
| 20090120533, | |||
| 20100175791, | |||
| 20130059162, | |||
| 20170304962, | |||
| CN101954552, | |||
| CN103212923, | |||
| CN1247448, | |||
| CN1273155, | |||
| DE10108330, | |||
| EP1052053, | |||
| GB1435858, | |||
| GB782307, | |||
| JP2000334597, | |||
| JP2016093845, | |||
| JP2017512654, | |||
| JP61115692, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jul 10 2017 | Lincoln Global, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Sep 30 2019 | HOWARD, ROBERT A | Lincoln Global, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050645 | /0614 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Nov 27 2023 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Jun 16 2023 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Dec 16 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jun 16 2024 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Jun 16 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Jun 16 2027 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Dec 16 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jun 16 2028 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Jun 16 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Jun 16 2031 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Dec 16 2031 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jun 16 2032 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Jun 16 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |