A system, method and computer program product are provided for calculating one or more indicative properties including one or more of the cetane number, octane number, pour point, cloud point and aniline point of oil fractions, from the density and fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) of a sample of an oil sample.
|
1. A method for operating a computer to assign an indicative property to a gas oil fraction or a gasoline fraction of an oil sample, wherein the oil sample is selected from the group consisting of crude oils, bitumens, heavy oils and shale oils, the method comprising:
deriving from the oil sample fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) data from a fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (FT-ICR MS), the FT-ICR MS data indicative of intensities at corresponding double bond equivalents (DBE);
obtaining a density of the oil sample;
entering into the computer the density of the oil sample and the FT-ICR MS data;
calculating an FT-ICR MS index (ftmsi) as
where intensity=the intensity for each double bond equivalent (DBE); and
deriving the indicative property as a function of the ftmsi and the density of the oil sample.
3. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
|
This application Continuation-in-Part of
the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
This invention relates to a method and process for the evaluation of samples of crude oil and its fractions by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS).
Crude oil originates from the decomposition and transformation of aquatic, mainly marine, living organisms and/or land plants that became buried under successive layers of mud and silt some 15-500 million years ago. They are essentially very complex mixtures of many thousands of different hydrocarbons. Depending on the source, the oil predominantly contains various proportions of straight and branched-chain paraffins, cycloparaffins, and naphthenic, aromatic, and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. These hydrocarbons can be gaseous, liquid, or solid under normal conditions of temperature and pressure, depending on the number and arrangement of carbon atoms in the molecules.
Crude oils vary widely in their physical and chemical properties from one geographical region to another and from field to field. Crude oils are usually classified into three groups according to the nature of the hydrocarbons they contain: paraffinic, naphthenic, asphaltic, and their mixtures. The differences are due to the different proportions of the various molecular types and sizes. One crude oil can contain mostly paraffins, another mostly naphthenes. Whether paraffinic or naphthenic, one can contain a large quantity of lighter hydrocarbons and be mobile or contain dissolved gases; another can consist mainly of heavier hydrocarbons and be highly viscous, with little or no dissolved gas. Crude oils can also include heteroatoms containing sulfur, nitrogen, nickel, vanadium and other elements in quantities that impact the refinery processing of the crude oil fractions. Light crude oils or condensates can contain sulfur in concentrations as low as 0.01 W %; in contrast, heavy crude oils can contain as much as 5-6 W %. Similarly, the nitrogen content of crude oils can range from 0.001-1.0 W %.
The nature of the crude oil governs, to a certain extent, the nature of the products that can be manufactured from it and their suitability for special applications. A naphthenic crude oil will be more suitable for the production of asphaltic bitumen, a paraffinic crude oil for wax. A naphthenic crude oil, and even more so an aromatic one, will yield lubricating oils with viscosities that are sensitive to temperature. However, with modern refining methods there is greater flexibility in the use of various crude oils to produce many desired type of products.
A crude oil assay is a traditional method of determining the nature of crude oils for benchmarking purposes. Crude oils are subjected to true boiling point (TBP) distillations and fractionations to provide different boiling point fractions. The crude oil distillations are carried out using the American Standard Testing Association (ASTM) Method D 2892. The common fractions and their nominal boiling points are given in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Fraction
Boiling Point, ° C.
Methane
−161.5
Ethane
−88.6
Propane
−42.1
Butanes
−6.0
Light Naphtha
36-90
Mid Naphtha
90-160
Heavy Naphtha
160-205
Light Gas Oil
205-260
Mid Gas Oil
260-315
Heavy Gas Oil
315-370
Light Vacuum Gas Oil
370-430
Mid Vacuum Gas Oil
430-480
Heavy Vacuum Gas Oil
480-565
Vacuum Residue
565+
The yields, composition, physical and indicative properties of these crude oil fractions, where applicable, are then determined during the crude assay work-up calculations. Typical compositional and property information obtained from a crude oil assay is given in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Property
Unit
Property Type
Fraction
Yield Weight and
W %
Yield
All
Volume %
API Gravity
°
Physical
All
Viscosity Kinematic @
°
Physical
Fraction boil-
38° C.
ing >250° C.
Refractive Index @
Unitless
Physical
Fraction boil-
20° C.
ing <400° C.
Sulfur
W %
Composition
All
Mercaptan Sulfur, W %
W %
Composition
Fraction boil-
ing <250° C.
Nickel
ppmw
Composition
Fraction boil-
ing >400° C.
Nitrogen
ppmw
Composition
All
Flash Point, COC
° C.
Indicative
All
Cloud Point
° C.
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing >250° C.
Pour Point, (Upper)
° C.
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing >250° C.
Freezing Point
° C.
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing >250° C.
Microcarbon Residue
W %
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing >300° C.
Smoke Point, mm
mm
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing between
150-250
Octane Number
Unitless
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing <250° C.
Cetane Index
Unitless
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing between
150-400
Aniline Point
° C.
Indicative
Fraction boil-
ing <520° C.
Due to the number of distillation cuts and the number of analyses involved, the crude oil assay work-up is both costly and time consuming.
In a typical refinery, crude oil is first fractionated in the atmospheric distillation column to separate sour gas and light hydrocarbons, including methane, ethane, propane, butanes and hydrogen sulfide, naphtha (36°−180° C.), kerosene (180°−240° C.), gas oil (240°−370° C.) and atmospheric residue (>370° C.). The atmospheric residue from the atmospheric distillation column is either used as fuel oil or sent to a vacuum distillation unit, depending on the configuration of the refinery. The principal products obtained from vacuum distillation are vacuum gas oil, comprising hydrocarbons boiling in the range 370°−520° C., and vacuum residue, comprising hydrocarbons boiling above 520° C. Crude assay data is conventionally obtained from individual analysis of these cuts to help refiners to understand the general composition of the crude oil fractions and properties so that the fractions can be processed most efficiently and effectively in an appropriate refining unit. Indicative properties are used to determine the engine/fuel performance or usability or flow characteristic or composition. A summary of the indicative properties and their determination methods with description is given below.
The cetane number of diesel fuel oil, determined by the ASTM D613 method, provides a measure of the ignition quality of diesel fuel; as determined in a standard single cylinder test engine; which measures ignition delay compared to primary reference fuels. The higher the cetane number; the easier the high-speed; direct-injection engine will start; and the less white smoking and diesel knock after start-up. The cetane number of a diesel fuel oil is determined by comparing its combustion characteristics in a test engine with those for blends of reference fuels of known cetane number under standard operating conditions. This is accomplished using the bracketing hand wheel procedure which varies the compression ratio (hand wheel reading) for the sample and each of the two bracketing reference fuels to obtain a specific ignition delay, thus permitting interpolation of cetane number in terms of hand wheel reading.
The octane number, determined by the ASTM D2699 or D2700 methods, is a measure of a fuel's ability to prevent detonation in a spark ignition engine. Measured in a standard single-cylinder; variable-compression-ratio engine by comparison with primary reference fuels. Under mild conditions, the engine measures research octane number (RON), while under severe conditions, the engine measures motor octane number (MON). Where the law requires posting of octane numbers on dispensing pumps, the antiknock index (AKI) is used. This is the arithmetic average of RON and MON, (R+M)/2. It approximates the road octane number, which is a measure of how an average car responds to the fuel.
The cloud point, determined by the ASTM D2500 method, is the temperature at which a cloud of wax crystals appears when a lubricant or distillate fuel is cooled under standard conditions. Cloud point indicates the tendency of the material to plug filters or small orifices under cold weather conditions. The specimen is cooled at a specified rate and examined periodically. The temperature at which cloud is first observed at the bottom of the test jar is recorded as the cloud point. This test method covers only petroleum products and biodiesel fuels that are transparent in 40 mm thick layers, and with a cloud point below 49° C.
The pour point of petroleum products, determined by the ASTM D97 method, is an indicator of the ability of oil or distillate fuel to flow at cold operating temperatures. It is the lowest temperature at which the fluid will flow when cooled under prescribed conditions. After preliminary heating, the sample is cooled at a specified rate and examined at intervals of 3° C. for flow characteristics. The lowest temperature at which movement of the specimen is observed is recorded as the pour point.
The aniline point, determined by the ASTM D611 method, is the lowest temperature at which equal volumes of aniline and hydrocarbon fuel or lubricant base stock are completely miscible. A measure of the aromatic content of a hydrocarbon blend is used to predict the solvency of a base stock or the cetane number of a distillate fuel. Specified volumes of aniline and sample, or aniline and sample plus n-heptane, are placed in a tube and mixed mechanically. The mixture is heated at a controlled rate until the two phases become miscible. The mixture is then cooled at a controlled rate and the temperature at which two separate phases are again formed is recorded as the aniline point or mixed aniline point.
To determine these properties of gas oil or naphtha fractions conventionally, these fractions have to be distilled from the crude oil and then measured/identified using various analytical methods that are laborious, costly and time-consuming.
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) includes two components: an ionization source and a mass analyzer. The ionization source ionizes molecules, while the mass analyzer determines the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of ions.
New rapid and direct methods to help better understand the crude oil composition and properties from the analysis of whole crude oil will save producers, marketers, refiners and/or other crude oil users substantial expense, effort and time. Therefore, a need exists for an improved system and method for determining indicative properties of crude oil fractions from different sources.
Systems and methods for determining the indicative properties of a hydrocarbon sample are provided. In accordance with the invention, indicative properties (i.e., cetane number, pour point, cloud point and aniline point of gas oil fraction and octane number of gasoline fraction in crude oils) are predicted by density and FT-ICR MS measurement of crude oils. The correlations also provide information about the gas oil properties without fractionation/distillation (crude oil assays) and will help producers, refiners, and marketers to benchmark the oil quality and, as a result, valuate the oils without performing the customary extensive and time-consuming crude oil assays.
Further advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
A system and method is provided for determining one or more indicative properties of a hydrocarbon sample. Indicative properties (e.g., one or more of cetane number, pour point, cloud point and aniline point) of a gas oil fraction in crude oil samples are assigned as a function of FT-ICR MS measurement of a crude oil sample and the density of the crude oil sample.
The correlations provide information about gas oil and/or naphtha indicative properties without fractionation/distillation (crude oil assays) and will help producers, refiners, and marketers to benchmark the oil quality and, as a result, valuate the oils without performing the customary extensive and time-consuming crude oil assays. The currently used crude oil assay method is costly in terms of money and time. It costs about $50,000 US and takes two months to complete one assay. With the method and system herein, the crude oil can be classified as a function of FT-ICR MS measurement data, and thus decisions can be made for purchasing and/or processing.
The systems and methods are applicable for naturally occurring hydrocarbons derived from crude oils, bitumens, heavy oils, shale oils and from refinery process units including hydrotreating, hydroprocessing, fluid catalytic cracking, coking, and visbreaking or coal liquefaction. Samples can be obtained from various sources, including an oil well, stabilizer, extractor, or distillation tower.
In the system and method herein, a mass spectra is obtained by a suitable known or to be developed FT-ICR MS, and from this spectra signal intensity data is obtained (Y-axis in
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) includes two components: an ionization source and a mass analyzer. The ionization source ionizes molecules, while the mass analyzer determines the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of ions.
A number of ionization sources have been used in FT-ICR MS, with some being preferable for gases, others for liquids, and others for solids. Ionization sources for FT-ICR MS include electron ionization (EI), which uses a glowing filament, which may break down the molecules under study. Inductively coupled plasma ionization (ICP) is a destructive technique which applies heat to reduce a sample to its atomic components. Chemical ionization (CI), a subset of EI, adds gases such as methane, isobutane, or ammonia, producing results that are less damaging to the molecules under study. Direct analysis in real time (DART) ionizes samples at atmospheric pressure using an electron beam. Matrix-assisted, laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a solid phase process that uses laser energy to ionize molecules off a metal target plate. Electrospray ionization (ESI), is a liquid phase process that produces a fine mist of droplets, as from an atomizer.
FT-ICR MS frequently relies on ESI or on a related variant, such as atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) or atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI). APCI uses a corona discharge from an electrified needle to induce ionization of a solvent, which in turn reacts with the sample molecules to induce a chemical reaction resulting in an ionized sample molecule. APPI uses a photon discharge from high-intensity ultraviolet light to ionize the solvent gas, which in turn ionizes the sample molecules. APCI works well with relatively small, neutral, or hydrophobic compounds, such as steroids, lipids, and non-polar drugs. APPI works well with highly non-polar molecules like napthols and anthracenes.
Thus, in the petroleum industry, FT-ICR is conducted using ESI, and preferably the APPI variant of ESI. A petroleum sample is diluted in an appropriate solvent and infused into the spectrometer. The liquid sample is evaporated and the components are ionized by ESI or APPI, yielding unfragmented gas phase ions of the sample components. These ions are trapped in the strong magnetic field of the mass analyzer, where their mass-to-charge ratios are determined with high resolution and accuracy. The spectrometer provides a resolution of R>300,000 at m/z 400, which is high enough for routinely separating signals spaced as closely as 3.4 mDa (SH4 vs. 12C3), which is essential for the correct assignment of the elemental composition (CcHhNnOoSsNiiVv) corresponding to each mass signal in petroleum samples. The identified elemental compositions are then classified according to the heteroatoms in their elemental composition, e.g., pure hydrocarbons, mono-sulfur (or mono-nitrogen) species for molecules with one sulfur (or nitrogen) atom, or molecules with any combination of heteroatoms. The corresponding double bond equivalent (DBE) values and carbon numbers are calculated for each identified elemental composition, where the DBE is defined as half the number of hydrogen atoms lacking from a completely saturated molecule with an otherwise identical number of carbon and heteroatoms.
where:
Intensity=the intensity for each double bond equivalent (DBE).
The indicative properties (e.g., the cetane number, pour point, cloud point and aniline point of the gas oil fraction boiling in the range 180-370° C. and octane number for gasoline fraction boiling in the range 36-180° C.) of the crude oil can be predicted from the density of whole crude oil (which is determined in step 230), and from the Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry index (FTMSI) of crude oil (which was determined in step 225). That is,
Indicative Property=f(densitycrude oil,FTMSIcrude oil) (2);
Equations (3) through (6) show, respectively, the cetane number, pour point, cloud point aniline point of gas oils boiling in the range 180-370° C., and equation (7) shows the octane number of gasoline boiling in the range 36-180° C. that can be predicted from the density and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry index of crude oils. Thus, in step 235, the cetane number is calculated as:
Cetane Number (CET)=KCET+X1CET*DEN+X2CET*FTMSI+X3CET*FTMSI2+X4CET*FTMSI3 (3);
In step 240, the pour point is calculated as:
Pour Point (PPT)=KPPT+X1PPT*DEN+X2PPT*FTMSI+X3PPT*FTMSI2X4PPT*FTMSI3 (4)
In step 245, the cloud point is calculated as:
Cloud Point (CPT)=KCPT+X1CPT*DEN+X2CPT*FTMSI+X3CPT*FTMSI2+X4CPT*FTMSI3 (5)
In step 250, the aniline point is calculated as:
Aniline Point (AP)=KAP+X1AP*DEN+X2AP*FTMSI+X3AP*FTMSI2X4AP*FTMSI3 (6)
In step 255, the octane number is calculated as:
Octane Number (ON)=KON+X1ON*DEN+X20N*FTMSI+X30N*FTMSI2 (7)
where:
DEN=density of the crude oil sample;
FTMSI=Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry index (derived from FT-ICR MS data); and
KCET, X1CET−X4CET, KPPT, X1PPT−X4PPT, KCPT, X1CPT−X4CPT, KAP, X1AP−X4AP, KON, X1ON−X3ON are constants that were developed using linear regression analysis of hydrocarbon data from the APPI mode of FT-ICR MS.
Program storage memory 470 and data storage memory 480 can each comprise volatile (RAM) and non-volatile (ROM) memory units and can also comprise hard disk and backup storage capacity, and both program storage memory 470 and data storage memory 480 can be embodied in a single memory device or separated in plural memory devices. Program storage memory 470 stores software program modules and associated data, and in particular stores a density and raw data receiving module 310, peak sorting module 315, heteroatom class export module 320, FTMSI calculation module 325, cetane number calculation module 330, pour point calculation module 340, cloud point calculation module 345, aniline point calculation module 350, and octane number calculation module 355. Data storage memory 480 stores data used and/or generated by the one or more modules of the present invention, including but not limited to density of the crude oil sample, raw data generated by the FT-ICR MS APPI source, and m/z correlations with DBE data and carbon number data.
The calculated and assigned results in accordance with the systems and methods herein are displayed, audibly outputted, printed, and/or stored to memory for use as described herein.
It is to be appreciated that the computer system 400 can be any general or special purpose computer such as a personal computer, minicomputer, workstation, mainframe, a dedicated controller such as a programmable logic controller, or a combination thereof. While the computer system 400 is shown, for illustration purposes, as a single computer unit, the system can comprise a group/farm of computers which can be scaled depending on the processing load and database size, e.g., the total number of samples that are processed and results maintained on the system. The computer system 400 can serve as a common multi-tasking computer.
Computer system 400 preferably supports an operating system, for example stored in program storage memory 470 and executed by the processor 420 from volatile memory. According to the present system and method, the operating system contains instructions for interfacing the device 400 to the calculation module(s). According to an embodiment of the invention, the operating system contains instructions for interfacing computer system 400 to the Internet and/or to private networks.
Crude oil samples were prepared and analyzed by atmospheric pressure photo ionization (APPI) Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) according to the method 200 described herein, and illustrated in
In step 205, Stock solution 1 is prepared by dissolving a 100 μL sample of the crude oil in 10 mL of toluene (or alternatively, in a 50/50% volume mixture of toluene with methanol, methylene chloride, dichloromethane or tetrahydrofuran). If complete solubility is not attained, based upon visual observation against a light source, methylene chloride is added to achieve a clear solution. The solution is shaken for a minimum of 20 seconds.
Solution 2 is prepared with a 1:100 dilution of solution 1 in methylene chloride. The miscibility of the solvent mix must be ensured.
Solution 3 is prepared with a 1:10 dilution of solution 2 in methylene chloride (i.e., 100 μL of solution 2 in 900 μL solvent).
The dilution ratio depends on the sample and has to be determined empirically on a case-by-case basis, starting from solution 3, then advancing to solution 2 and then to solution 1.
Key Instrument Parameters
For each analysis of a sample, the operator tunes the spectrometer settings to optimize performance. Key parameters and default settings follow:
TD (Fid Size): 4M
Average Spectra: 100
Source Accumulation: 0.001 s
Ion Accumulation Time: 0.001 s
TOF (AQS): variable, depending on sample
APPI Temperature 250-400° C., depending on sample
Detection Mode: Broadband
Low Mass: 150 to 350 m/z
High Mass: 3000 m/z
Mass Calibration and Performance Check
The performance of the FT-ICR MS instrument is checked by obtaining a mass calibration in ESI positive mode. This ESI calibration can be used in the APPI mode by exchanging the ESI ion source with the APPI source. The mass calibration remains valid for one day of normal operation as long as the key instrument parameters described above have not been changed. A change of any of the key instrument parameters requires a complete recalibration by switching to the ESI source, calibration, followed by switching back to the APPI source.
Analysis
In step 210, the analysis begins with Solution 3, which is directly infused into the mass calibrated FT-ICR MS APPI source by a syringe pump. The operator records and averages 100 accumulated scans, which serve as a general basis for fine-tuning the instrument parameters.
If sufficient signal intensity (108 to 109 units) is not obtained with Solution 3, the analysis is repeated with Solution 2. If the analysis with Solution 2 still does not yield sufficient signal intensity, the analysis is repeated with Solution 1.
The operator checks the signal shape at the beginning, middle and end of the mass range. An excessive sample load can be diagnosed by a signal splitting. In case of signal splitting, all signals will appear as two closely aligned signals or, in severe cases, even as a group of signals. When the operator observes such signal splitting, he should dilute the sample until he obtains a good independent signal shape.
The following pass/fail criteria are applied to the tests. A mass calibration is acceptable when every mass calibrant in the mass range of the sample does not deviate more than ±0.2 ppm from the expected value, except calibrants that are discarded from the list due to either low intensity (below 3 times the baseline noise) or a calibrant signal that is overlapping a contamination signal.
Data Processing Workflow
Data processing is an extensive exercise involving four different software packages as described below. Data processing can significantly impact the quality of the produced data and therefore must be performed by, or under the direction of an experienced scientist. The trade names of the respective programs are followed by their sources.
DataAcquisition from Bruker Daltonics of Bremen, Germany. The raw data is checked for sufficient signal shape and intensity as described above and, if necessary, re-measured until sufficient signal shape and intensity are obtained.
DataAnalysis from Bruker Daltonics of Bremen, Germany. The recorded raw data file is loaded into the DataAnalysis software. In step 215, the peak list is sorted according to increasing m/z values. The m/z values and intensities are then saved as a peak list “text file.”
Composer from SierraAnalytics of Modesto, California. The peak lists are loaded into the Composer software. The Composer software is started and a suitable parameter file is loaded. In step 220, the recalibration is checked by looking at the identified species. The individual series are inspected for consistency, i.e., for missing series and/or interrupted series, which may indicate non-ideal re-calibration. In exceptional cases, recalibration parameters have to be fine tuned until a good fit of the data is obtained. The main heteroatom classes, which are those constituting more than 1 percent of the assigned heteroatom classes, are exported into the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet “Automatic Processing Composer Data.xls.”
Excel Spreadsheet Automatic Processing Composer Data: This in-house developed spreadsheet processes the elemental compositions calculated by the Composer software and produces all graphs in a final reporting form. An Excel workbook with one summary tab and detail tabs for each identified heteroatom class is created.
Exemplary constants KCET, X1CET−X4CET, KPPT, X1PPT−X4PPT, KCPT, X1CPT−X4CPT, KAP, X1AP−X4AP, KON, X1ON−X3ON are were developed using linear regression analysis of hydrocarbon data from the APPI mode of FT-ICR MS, and are given in Table 3.
TABLE 3
Cetane
Pour
Cloud
Aniline
Octane
Constants
Number
Point
Point
Point
Number
K
−322.2
−266.1
4.5
166.7
128.8
X1
419.0
299.4
−3.4
−119.8
−91.1
X2
−22.9
−180.7
−127.2
51.0
8.8
X3
198.8
558.1
330.6
−123.9
3.2
X4
−175.3
−387.4
−215.0
70.2
—
A sample of Arabian medium crude with a 15° C./4° C. density of 0.8828 Kg/I was analyzed by APPI FT-ICR MS, using the described method. The mass spectral data is presented in Table 4 and is shown in
The FT-ICR MS index, FTMSI, is calculated using equation (1) by summing the intensities of the detected peaks and then dividing by 1E+11, with the value in the example calculated as 0.40707.
TABLE 4
Double Bond Equivalent (DBE)
Intensity
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
3047754803
5
4148548475
6
4106580447
7
4475073884
8
4874039296
9
4852787148
10
4060232629
11
2831278701
12
2726027390
13
2196336212
14
1348225844
15
980497462
16
604773496
17
455374155
18
0
19
0
Applying equation (3) and the constants from Table 3,
Applying equation (4) and the constants from Table 3,
Applying equation (5) and the constants from Table 3,
Applying equation (6) and the constants from Table 3,
Applying equation (7) and the constants from Table 3,
In alternate embodiments, the present invention can be implemented as a computer program product for use with a computerized computing system. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that programs defining the functions of the present invention can be written in any appropriate programming language and delivered to a computer in any form, including but not limited to: (a) information permanently stored on non-writeable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices such as ROMs or CD-ROM disks); (b) information alterably stored on writeable storage media (e.g., floppy disks and hard drives); and/or (c) information conveyed to a computer through communication media, such as a local area network, a telephone network, or a public network such as the Internet. When carrying computer readable instructions that implement the present invention methods, such computer readable media represent alternate embodiments of the present invention.
As generally illustrated herein, the system embodiments can incorporate a variety of computer readable media that comprise a computer usable medium having computer readable code means embodied therein. One skilled in the art will recognize that the software associated with the various processes described can be embodied in a wide variety of computer accessible media from which the software is loaded and activated. Pursuant to In re Beauregard, 35 USPQ2d 1383 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,578), the present invention contemplates and includes this type of computer readable media within the scope of the invention. In certain embodiments, pursuant to In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/211,928), the scope of the present claims is limited to computer readable media, wherein the media is both tangible and non-transitory.
The system and method of the present invention have been described above and with reference to the attached figure; however, modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and the scope of protection for the invention is to be defined by the claims that follow.
Koseoglu, Omer Refa, Al-Hajji, Adnan, Muller, Hendrik, Jawad, Hanadi H.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11320413, | Feb 24 2021 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Characterization of crude oil by time of flight mass spectrometry |
11874258, | Oct 11 2018 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | System and method of characterizing crude oil by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3617501, | |||
3896312, | |||
4251870, | Sep 05 1975 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Control of gasoline manufacture |
4897177, | Mar 23 1988 | Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. | Process for reforming a hydrocarbon fraction with a limited C9 + content |
4971915, | May 15 1987 | Applied Biosystems, LLC | Simulated distillation of petroleum residues by capillary SFC |
4988446, | Jan 23 1987 | EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY, A CORP OF DE | Method for spectroscopic analysis of hydrocarbons |
5121337, | Oct 15 1990 | Exxon Research and Engineering Company | Method for correcting spectral data for data due to the spectral measurement process itself and estimating unknown property and/or composition data of a sample using such method |
5223714, | Nov 26 1991 | Marathon Petroleum Company LLC | Process for predicting properties of multi-component fluid blends |
5266800, | Oct 01 1992 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Schlumberger-Doll Research | Method of distinguishing between crude oils |
5304807, | Nov 25 1992 | PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY | Method for determining the degradation of fuel oil by UV absorption |
5424959, | Jul 19 1993 | Texaco Inc. | Interpretation of fluorescence fingerprints of crude oils and other hydrocarbon mixtures using neural networks |
5452232, | Aug 18 1987 | ABB EUTECH LIMITED | Method and apparatus for determining a property or yield of a hydrocarbon product based on NIRA of the feedstock |
5475612, | Aug 18 1987 | TOPNIR SYSTEMS | Method for the direct determination of physical properties of hydrocarbon products |
5490085, | Feb 27 1987 | TOPNIR SYSTEMS | Method for optimizing control of a production unit |
5572030, | Apr 22 1994 | Intevep, S.A. | Method for determining parameter of hydrocarbon |
5600134, | Jun 23 1995 | Exxon Research and Engineering Co | Method for preparing blend products |
5602755, | Jun 23 1995 | EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO | Method for predicting chemical or physical properties of complex mixtures |
5656810, | Nov 22 1993 | Research Foundation of City College of New York | Method and apparatus for evaluating the composition of an oil sample |
5699269, | Jun 23 1995 | Exxon Research and Engineering Company | Method for predicting chemical or physical properties of crude oils |
5699270, | Jun 23 1995 | Exxon Research and Engineering Company | Method for preparing lubrication oils (LAW232) |
6070128, | Jun 06 1995 | Eutech Engineering Solutions Limited | Method for determining properties using near infra-red (NIR) spectroscopy |
6258987, | Aug 09 1999 | BP Amoco Corporation | Preparation of alcohol-containing gasoline |
6275775, | Feb 10 1998 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for determining at least one physico-chemical property of a petroleum fraction |
6490029, | Dec 28 1998 | SK ENERGY CO , LTD | Automatic analysis method of crude petroleum oils using spectroscopy |
6602403, | May 05 1998 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | Process for selectively producing high octane naphtha |
6611735, | Nov 17 1999 | Afton Chemical Intangibles LLC | Method of predicting and optimizing production |
6633043, | Jan 30 2002 | KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS | Method for characterization of petroleum oils using normalized time-resolved fluorescence spectra |
6662116, | Nov 30 2001 | ExxonMobile Research and Engineering Company | Method for analyzing an unknown material as a blend of known materials calculated so as to match certain analytical data and predicting properties of the unknown based on the calculated blend |
6711532, | Sep 01 1998 | A C ANALYTICAL CONTROLS HOLDING B V | Method and apparatus for predicting a distillation temperature range of a hydrocarbon-containing compound |
6841779, | Aug 24 2001 | University of Utah Research Foundation; University of Utah | Measurement of wax precipitation temperature and precipitated solid weight percent versus temperature by infrared spectroscopy |
6893874, | Oct 17 2000 | BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS LLC | Method for storing and transporting crude oil |
7126332, | Jul 20 2001 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole high resolution NMR spectroscopy with polarization enhancement |
7173239, | Mar 14 2003 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for downhole quantification of methane using near infrared spectroscopy |
7560711, | Aug 09 2006 | KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS | Multiple fingerprinting of petroleum oils using normalized time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence spectral subtractions |
7598487, | Nov 22 2005 | ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company | Micro-hydrocarbon analysis |
8714246, | May 22 2008 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole measurement of formation characteristics while drilling |
8930149, | Oct 18 2010 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Relative valuation method for naphtha streams |
9285307, | Feb 22 2011 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Characterization of crude oil by ultraviolet visible spectroscopy |
9423391, | Oct 18 2010 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Relative valuation method for naphtha streams |
9429556, | Oct 18 2010 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Relative valuation method for naphtha streams |
9778240, | Feb 22 2011 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Characterization of crude oil by ultraviolet visible spectroscopy |
9816919, | Feb 22 2011 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Characterization of crude oil by simulated distillation |
20020052769, | |||
20030042414, | |||
20030141459, | |||
20030195708, | |||
20050109934, | |||
20050173298, | |||
20060043004, | |||
20060047444, | |||
20060142955, | |||
20070050154, | |||
20070231912, | |||
20070295640, | |||
20080037006, | |||
20080040051, | |||
20080206887, | |||
20080248967, | |||
20080253426, | |||
20080260584, | |||
20090011517, | |||
20090180949, | |||
20090279072, | |||
20090290144, | |||
20090316139, | |||
20100049681, | |||
20100113311, | |||
20100204925, | |||
20100211329, | |||
20100218585, | |||
20110152136, | |||
20110240841, | |||
20110308996, | |||
20120171151, | |||
20130013274, | |||
20140075827, | |||
20140156241, | |||
20150106027, | |||
20150106028, | |||
20150106029, | |||
20150106031, | |||
20150112610, | |||
20150112611, | |||
20160011102, | |||
20160187253, | |||
20160195481, | |||
20160195507, | |||
20160195508, | |||
20160377589, | |||
20170003217, | |||
20170363540, | |||
20170363591, | |||
20170363602, | |||
20170363603, | |||
CA2781273, | |||
EP304232, | |||
EP305090, | |||
EP552300, | |||
EP794433, | |||
EP859236, | |||
EP984277, | |||
SU1523972, | |||
SU817486, | |||
WO3048759, | |||
WO2004033513, | |||
WO2006030218, | |||
WO2009082418, | |||
WO2013102916, | |||
WO2016111988, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 17 2017 | KOSEOGLU, OMER REFA | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046037 | /0936 | |
Jun 30 2017 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 17 2018 | AL-HAJJI, ADNAN | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046037 | /0936 | |
Apr 23 2018 | MULLER, HENDRIK | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046037 | /0936 | |
Oct 28 2018 | JAWAD, HANADI H | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048614 | /0650 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 18 2024 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 02 2024 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 28 2023 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 28 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 28 2024 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 28 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 28 2027 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 28 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 28 2028 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 28 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 28 2031 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 28 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 28 2032 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 28 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |