A process of stimulating hydrocarbon recovery is described and claimed. This process includes introducing a gas, a liquified gas or a vaporized liquified gas, into an underground formation containing hydrocarbons such as crude oil and gas, permitting said gas to be absorbed by said hydrocarbons, and withdrawing said hydrocarbons containing the gas therein, wherein a pill of hydrocarbon recovery fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is inserted into the underground formation containing hydrocarbons before, during or after the introduction of the gas, liquified gas or a vaporized liquified gas.
|
1. A process of stimulating hydrocarbon recovery comprising
(a) introducing a gas, a liquefied gas or vaporized liquefied gas into an underground formation containing hydrocarbons;
(b) permitting said gas, liquefied gas or vaporized liquefied gas to be absorbed by said hydrocarbons;
(c) withdrawing said hydrocarbons containing said gas, liquefied gas or vaporized liquefied gas absorbed therein; and
(d) inserting a pill of hydrocarbon recovery fluid comprising an aqueous silica sol comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles into the underground formation, before the introduction of the gas, liquefied gas or vaporized liquefied gas, wherein said surface functionalized nanoparticles are brine resistant silica sol nanoparticles surface functionalized with a silane compound having at least one organic functional group selected from the group consisting of a vinyl group, an ether group, an epoxy group, a styryl group, a methacryl group, an acryl group, an amino group, an isocyanurate group, an alkoxysilane group, a silazane group and a siloxane group, and wherein the surface functionalized nanoparticles alter wettability of solid/liquefied surfaces and facilitate flow of the hydrocarbons.
2. The process of
3. The process of
4. The process of
10. The process of
11. The process of
sodium hydroxide,
one anionic surfactant, and
one nonionic surfactant.
12. The process of
13. The process of
14. The process of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/563,415, filed on Sep. 26, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety; claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/697,321, filed on Jul. 12, 2018, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety; claims priority to European Patent Application No. 17194608.0, filed on Oct. 3, 2017; and claims priority to United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1811749.9, filed on Jul. 18, 2018.
The present invention relates to improved hydrocarbon recovery methods using gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas, liquified carbon dioxide and/or mixtures thereof in combination with functionalized materials such as nanoparticles or mixtures of nanoparticles.
There are approximately 1.7 million active oil and gas wells in the US. At this point in time, hundreds of thousands of these oil and gas wells have declined or depleted to the point of being marginally economical. As wells age, multiple mechanisms contribute to the production decline.
In addition to mechanical failures of a well's infrastructure, the following formation damage accelerates the production decline:
Enhancing well productivity has traditionally been done using stimulation methods that increase the permeability of the reservoir rock or lower the oil viscosity. Matrix acidizing (see: “Sandstone Matrix Acidizing Knowledge and Future Development”, by Mian Umer Shafiq and Hisham Ben Mahmud, J. Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2017) 7: 1205-1216), as a method of stimulation, is relatively inexpensive but narrow in scope. Ideal candidates for this process typically include wells in formations with a permeability of >10 mD and where solids plug the pores near the wellbore and/or at the perforations. The refracturing process is at the other end of the spectrum. This can be used to stimulate productivity, but it is a costlier option and riskier value proposition, especially for unconventional wells.
Gases and Liquified Gases, such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas and liquified carbon dioxide have a long history of improving relative permeability, providing energy and drive in miscible and immiscible recovery applications. Studies have shown that Huff n Puff (hereinafter abbreviated as “HNP”) treatments with gas have achieved particularly positive results on oil recovery and short-term production (
Nitrogen-HNP has also shown very beneficial results in field studies carried out in suitable formations in the Appalachian Basin (see “Field Case: Cyclic Gas Recovery for Light Oil Using Carbon Dioxide/Nitrogen/Natural Gas”, written by B. J. Miller and T. Hamilton-Smith, SPE 49169, Conference: SPE Annual Technical Meeting and Exhibition, September 1998). HNP treatments for stimulating well production are usually individual, cyclic well treatments comprising three phases: injection, soaking and production.
HNPs also provide important information on injectivity and pressure communication with adjacent wells. As a proven, single-well stimulation method, they can dramatically increase production from stripper, depleted or low-pressure oil wells. Under certain conditions, carbon dioxide and nitrogen can become miscible with crude, lowering its viscosity and thereby further enhancing recovery.
Over the years, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas and liquified carbon dioxide HNP treatments have been used as an affordable, effective means of enhancing recovery. They are an ideal solution for marginal wells in advanced decline and an effective way of stimulating reservoirs with poor inter-well communications. More recently, studies have shown that HNP injection is a more effective method for enhancing oil production from shales than continuous gas flooding (see “Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs”, written by J. J. Sheng, Petroleum, 2017 and “Gas Selection for Huff-n-Puff EOR In Shale Oil Reservoirs Based upon Experimental and Numerical Study”, written by L. Li and J. J. Sheng, SPE-185066-MS, 2017.)
Treatments can be applied multiple times to a single well to support improved oil recovery (IOR) and enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Small volumes of Carbon Dioxide can generate significant increases in recoverable reserves and production that provide quick payback as a result of that increased production.
Nanoparticles have been at the forefront of research into various applications in the oil and gas industry for at least a decade now. Nanoparticles are usually particles under 100 nm in size and can be made up of various inorganic materials such as silica, alumina and oxides of iron. Nanoparticles can be structured to contain an inner core and an outer shell (see “Nanofluids Science and Technology”, written by S. K. Das, S. U. S. Choi, W. Yu, and T. Pradeep, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Publishing. ISBN 0470074736). Their outer shell can be modified to alter their wettability. Nanoparticles (either unmodified or modified) can then be dispersed in an aqueous or organic medium such as water, methanol or isopropanol and deployed. Nanoparticles are highly versatile and can be designed for specific applications.
The true mode of action of nanoparticles in a reservoir depends on how they are designed and deployed. However, laboratory studies have shown that nanoparticles in dispersion can align themselves at the oil, aqueous, solid three-phase contact angle (see “Spreading of Nanofluids on Solids”, written by D. T. Wasan and Nikolov, Journal of Nature (423): 156-159, A. 2003.). The alignment of the nanoparticles in a wedge between oil and rock generates what is known as structural disjoining pressure, which helps create a pressure gradient sufficient to lift an oil droplet off the surface of the rock. This phenomenon results in increased oil recovery rates and has been demonstrated in imbibition and in-core flow tests (see “Spreading of Nanofluids on Solids”, written by D. T. Wasan and Nikolov, Journal of Nature (423): 156-159, A. 2003.).
In the field, case studies have been reported that exhibit the effectiveness of nanoparticle dispersions. In one field trial, a silicon dioxide-based nanoparticle dispersion was deployed in a hydraulic fracturing application (see “Application of Nanofluid Technology to Improve Recovery in Oil and Gas Wells”, written by P. M. Mcelfresh, D. L. Holcomb and D. Ector, Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/154827-MS, 2012, Jan. 1). The dispersion was deployed as a pre-pad pill ahead of the pad stage in a fracture job for first contact with the reservoir in five wells in the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations in the Permian Basin. Field results displayed significant increases in initial production of around 20 percent compared with the type curves. These rates appeared to be sustained for the successful wells even in the presence of an offset fracture breakthrough. The results also showed a decrease in the initial effective decline rate.
Further references in this area include:
Carpenter, C., Journal of Petroleum Technology, Modelling of Production Decline Caused by Fines Migration in Deepwater Reservoirs, February 2018; Eagle Ford Type Curve, eia.gov/analysis/studies/usshalegas/pdf/usshaleplays.pdf;
Wei, B., Pu, W., Pang, S., Kong, L., Mechanisms of N2 and CO2 Assisted Steam Huff-n-Puff Process in Enhancing Heavy Oil Recovery: A Case Study Using Experimental and Numerical Simulation, Conference: Conference: SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, January 2017;
Miller, B. J., Hamilton-Smith, T., SPE 49169 “Field Case: Cyclic Gas Recovery for Light Oil Using Carbon Dioxide/Nitrogen/Natural Gas”, Conference: SPE Annual Technical Meeting and Exhibition, September 1998;
Sheng, J. J., Optimization off huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs, Petroleum, 2017;
Li, L., Sheng, J. J., Gas Selection for Huff-n-Puff EOR In Shale Oil Reservoirs Based upon Experimental and Numerical Study, SPE-185066-MS, 2017;
Palmer, F. S., Landry, R. W., Bou-Mikael, S. SPE 15497, “Design and Implementation of Immiscible Carbon Dioxide Displacement Projects (CO2 Huff-Puff) in South Louisiana”, Conference: SPE Annual Technical Meeting and Exhibition, October 1986;
Das, S. K., Choi, S. U.S., Yu, W., and Pradeep, T. 2008. Nanofluids Science and Technology. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Publishing. ISBN 0470074736;
Wasan, D. T., and Nikolov, Spreading of Nanofluids on Solids. Journal of Nature (423): 156-159, A. 2003;
Mcelfresh, P. M., Holcomb, D. L., & Ector, D. Application of Nanofluid Technology to Improve Recovery in Oil and Gas Wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/154827-MS, 2012, Jan. 1 and
Syfan, F. E., Holcomb, D. L., Lowrey, T. A., Nickerson, R. L., Sam, A. B., & Ahmad, Y. Enhancing Delaware Basin Stimulation Results Using Nanoparticle Dispersion Technology. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/189876-MS, 2018, Jan. 23.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,390,068, “Carbon Dioxide Stimulated Oil Recovery Process”, issued 8 Jun. 1983, describes and claims a process of stimulating oil recovery using carbon dioxide in the liquified state. The carbon dioxide is introduced into an underground formation where it partially dissolves in the crude oil present therein. A back pressure in the range of atmospheric to approximately 300 psi is maintained on the formation while the oil containing carbon dioxide is withdrawn. The carbon dioxide is thereafter separated from the oil.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,381,863, “Cyclic Huff-n-Puff with Immiscible Injection and Miscible Production Steps” issued 17 Jan. 1995, describes and claims a method of recovering hydrocarbons from a reservoir under an active waterflood or water drive by injecting a recovery fluid comprising carbon dioxide or nitrogen under immiscible conditions, allowing the recovery fluid to soak, and producing the recovery fluid and formation fluids under conditionally miscible or miscible conditions after pressure has sufficiently increased in the wellbore area.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,216,712 “Treatment of Oil Wells” issued 15 May 2007, describes and claims a method wherein hydrocarbon solids are removed from an oil well by feeding into the oil well a composition comprising at least 40 vol. % dense phase carbon dioxide and at least 30 vol. % of a C1 C3 alkanol component and optionally one or more surfactants, under a pressure of 300 to 10,000 psia and a temperature of 90° F. to 120° F., holding the composition in the well to solubilize hydrocarbon solids, and then removing from the well a liquified composition comprising solubilized hydrocarbon solids and alkanol. Gases such as Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen, Natural Gas and/or Natural Gas Liquifieds can also be used in waterless fracturing of a suitable hydrocarbon-bearing formation.
The article, “Waterless fracturing technologies for unconventional reservoirs-opportunities for liquified nitrogen”, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 35 (2016) 160-174, by Lei Wang et al., describes waterless fracturing technologies. During the past two decades, hydraulic fracturing has significantly improved oil and gas production from shale and tight sandstone reservoirs in the United States and elsewhere. Considering formation damage, water consumption and environmental impacts associated with water-based fracturing fluids, efforts have been devoted to developing waterless fracturing technologies because of their potential to alleviate these issues. Key theories and features of waterless fracturing technologies, including Oil-based and Carbon Dioxide energized oil fracturing, explosive and propellant fracturing, gelled Liquified Petroleum Gas (“LPG”) and alcohol fracturing, gas fracturing, Carbon Dioxide fracturing, and cryogenic fracturing are reviewed. Experimental results are shown describing the efficacy of liquified nitrogen in enhancing fracture initiation and propagation in concrete samples, and shale and sandstone reservoir rocks. In the laboratory study, cryogenic fractures generated were qualitatively and quantitatively characterized by pressure decay tests, acoustic measurements, gas fracturing and CT scans. The capacity and applicable of cryogenic fracturing using liquified nitrogen are demonstrated and examined. By properly formulating the technical procedures for field implementation, cryogenic fracturing using liquified nitrogen could be an advantageous option for fracturing unconventional reservoirs.
The Linde Group, is one of the leading gases and engineering companies in the world, working in more than 100 countries worldwide. The Linde Group is located in Klosterhofstrasse 1, 80 331 Munich, Germany 80331. Since the early 1990s, Linde has deployed Huff'n Puff technology to inject carbon dioxide into depleted wells to incrementally increase oil production. Less costly than refracturing, Huff′n Puff provides the energy to give hydrocarbons in low-pressure zones the necessary lift to get them flowing to the wellbore.
Nissan Chemical America Corporation is a leading manufacturer of colloidal silica and colloidal electro-conductive oxide solutions. Located at 10333 Richmond Avenue, Suite 1100, Houston, Tex. 77042, Nissan Chemical America Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nissan Chemical Corporation, Ltd. a Japanese company. Nissan Chemical America Corporation offers colloidal silica products for sale as well as Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluids incorporating colloidal silica products.
Improved oil recovery treatment methods play an increasing role in the oil and gas industry, as existing fields become depleted resulting in reduced production. What would be desirable are new and modified well stimulation (remediation) methods to increase the recovery of hydrocarbons and reducing the water cut from an underperforming well, preferably using non-aqueous materials.
The first aspect of the instant claimed invention is a process of stimulating hydrocarbon recovery comprising
The second aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein the injected gas, liquified gas or a vaporized liquified gas and Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles may also include one or more injectants, selected from the group consisting of fresh water, KCl water, diverters and any other injectant currently used in oil field remediation as part of the treatment.
The third aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said pill of Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is inserted into the underground formation containing hydrocarbons before the introduction of the gas, liquified gas or a vaporized liquified gas.
The fourth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said pill of Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is inserted into the underground formation containing hydrocarbons during the introduction of the gas, liquified gas or a vaporized liquified gas.
The fifth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said pill of Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is inserted into the underground formation containing hydrocarbons after the introduction of the gas, liquified gas, or a vaporized liquified gas.
The sixth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said gas is selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas, liquified carbon dioxide and/or mixtures thereof.
The seventh aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said gas is carbon dioxide.
The eighth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said gas is nitrogen.
The ninth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said gas is natural gas.
The tenth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said gas is liquified natural gas, liquified carbon dioxide and/or mixtures thereof.
The eleventh aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the sixth aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said gas is a mixture of two or more gases selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas, liquified carbon dioxide and/or mixtures thereof.
The twelfth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the first aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said process is part of a huff and puff treatment process.
The thirteenth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the twelfth aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said process is a waterless fracturing process.
The fourteenth aspect of the instant claimed invention is the process of the thirteenth aspect of the instant claimed invention wherein said process is a less water fracturing process.
The process for stimulating hydrocarbon recovery comprises injection of a gas, such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas, liquified carbon dioxide and/or mixtures thereof into an underground formation containing hydrocarbons, permitting said gas to flush liquids, such as condensate, water, etc. etc., and debris in the near well bore area and to pressurize the well up to 500 psi. In the event the gas is miscible in the crude oil, the gas will cause it to swell and reduce viscosity. The stimulation process includes combining injection of gas with a pill of Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles, which may be introduced before, during or after the gas.
The surface functionalized nanoparticles have specific unique properties that enables hydrocarbon production from micro to nano sized spaces, including those spaces classified as voids or fractures. The surface functionalized nanoparticles may cause wettability alteration of solid/liquified surfaces facilitating flow. The stimulation process involves combining gas and Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles which results in a hydrocarbon production enhancement that is attributable to synergistic effects.
Throughout this patent application the term “pill” has the following definition: Pill—Any relatively small quantity of a special blend of drilling fluid to accomplish a specific task that the regular drilling fluid cannot perform. Fluid pills are commonly prepared for a variety of special functions. Pills are small quantities of drilling fluids and it is understood that more than one pill may be added to a hydrocarbon formation.
The first aspect of the instant claimed invention is a process of stimulating hydrocarbon recovery comprising
The surface functionalized nanoparticles may be made from any suitable material. Non-limiting examples of suitable surface functionalized nanoparticle materials include ceramics, metals, metal oxides (e.g., silica, titania, alumina, zirconia, vanadyl, ceria, iron oxide, antimony oxide, tin oxide, aluminum, zinc oxide, boron, and combinations thereof), polymers (e.g., polystyrene), resins (e.g., silicone resin), and pigments (e.g., chromite spinel pigments). In some embodiments, the surface functionalized nanoparticles comprise a plurality of hydrophobized nanoparticles. In some embodiments the surface functionalized nanoparticles are surface functionalized colloidal silica nanoparticles.
It is generally well known in oilfield applications that subterranean formations contain large amounts of water containing dissolved salts such as NaCl, CaCl2), KCl, MgCl2 and others. This aqueous salt mixture is typically referred to as Brine. Brine conditions for different regions and wells vary widely with different downhole conditions and lithologies. In general, fluids used downhole must either tolerate briny conditions or have brine-resistant properties.
Colloidal systems in general and aqueous colloidal silica rely primarily upon electrostatic repulsion between charged silica particles to avoid unwanted or adverse phenomena such as particle agglomeration, flocculation, gelation and sedimentation. This electrostatic repulsion is easily disrupted in briny conditions typically found in subterranean formations. Furthermore, agglomeration/flocculation/gelation/sedimentation of colloidal silica and fluids containing colloidal silica in downhole applications would have the potential to damage the well or potentially plug the well entirely. Therefore, application of colloidal silica in downhole applications necessitates imparting brine resistant properties to colloidal silica and fluids containing colloidal silica before application.
In order not to gel upon exposure to brine (salt water), the nanoparticles must have a surface functionalization that stabilizes the colloidal silica. The surface functionalization of the colloidal silica allows the colloidal silica to be resistant to the effects of brine (salt water) and heat. Surface functionalized colloidal silica are typically referred to as “brine resistant silica sols”. Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluids comprising surface functionalized colloidal silica are used, along with gases described herein to effectuate the further removal of hydrocarbons from underperforming wells.
Standard tests for brine stability are disclosed in the following paragraphs:
API Brine by Visual Observation:
A 10 wt % API Brine solution is prepared by dissolving 8 wt % NaCl (SigmaAldrich) and 2 wt % CaCl2) (Sigma Aldrich) in distilled water. Testing for Brine resistance is done by placing 1 gram of example silica sol into 10 grams of API Brine Solution. Stability observations are performed at standard brine exposure periods of 10 minutes and 24 hours. These observations include the clarity and transparency of the silica sol. The results of these observations are recorded at these times. Silica sol solutions that are stable to Brine exposure will remain clear and transparent/opalescent while unstable examples become visibly hazy and opaque after brine exposure.
Artificial Seawater by Visual Observation
Artificial seawater is prepared by dissolving Fritz Pro Aquatics RPM Reef Pro Mix (Fritz Industries, Inc.) at 6 wt % in distilled water. Testing for Brine resistance is done by placing 1 gram of example silica sol into 10 grams of Artificial Seawater. Stability observations are performed at standard brine exposure periods of 10 minutes and 24 hours. These observations include the clarity and transparency of the silica sol. The results of these observations are recorded at these times. Silica sol solutions that are stable to Brine exposure will remain clear and transparent/opalescent while unstable examples become visibly hazy and opaque after brine exposure.
API Brine Resistance Test by Use of a Turbidimeter
Reference: US EPA 180.1 Determination of Turbidity by Nephelometry
A difference between this test and the US EPA 101.1 test is that in this test, step 11.2 is not followed:
Step 11.2 reads as follows: Turbidities exceeding 40 units: Dilute the sample with one or more volumes of turbidity-free water until the turbidity falls below 40 units. The turbidity of the original sample is then computed from the turbidity of the diluted sample and the dilution factor. For example, if 5 volumes of turbidity-free water were added to 1 volume of sample, and the diluted sample showed a turbidity of 30 units, then the turbidity of the original sample was 180 units.
For this work, the actual (“raw”) value of turbidity is recorded, whether it is above, below or equal to 40.
Test solutions/surface treated silicasols are tested for Brine resistance by Turbidimetry.
A calibrated Hach 2100AN Turbidimeter is used to measure Turbidity in units of NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units).
Test solution amounts of 3.0 g are placed into standard turbidity test tubes of approximately 30 ml.
Twenty-seven grams (27 g) of 10% API brine (8 wt % NaCl, 2 wt % CaCl2) are added to the test tube and the mixture inverted three times to mix test solution and brine. Test solution concentrations are therefore 10 wt % in API Brine.
Sample test tubes are inserted into the Turbidimeter and an initial measurement of turbidity is taken immediately, followed by a turbidity measurement after 24 hours.
A change in turbidity of more than 100NTU leads to the conclusion that the silica sol is not brine stable. Conversely a change in turbidity of less than 100NTU after API brine exposure leads to the conclusion that the silica sol is brine stable.
Dynamic Light Scattering Method
Whether the silica particles in the aqueous silica sol are dispersed or coagulated can be determined by measuring the average particle diameter by dynamic light scattering (DLS average particle diameter) for silica particles of the silica sol in the chemical fluid.
The DLS average particle diameter represents the average value of secondary particle diameter (dispersed particle diameter), and it is said that the DLS average particle diameter in a completely dispersed state is about twice the average particle diameter (which represents the average value of primary particle diameter in terms of specific surface diameter obtained through measurement by nitrogen adsorption (BET method) or Sears' particle diameter). It then can be determined that as the DLS average particle diameter increases, the silica particles in the aqueous silica sol is more coagulated.
In a case where the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles has a good resistance to high temperature and salt, the DLS average particle diameter after a high temperature and salt resistance test is almost the same as the DLS average particle diameter of the chemical fluid. For example, if the ratio of the DLS average particle diameter after a high temperature and salt resistance test/the DLS average particle diameter of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is 1.1 or less, it shows that the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles after a high temperature and salt resistance test maintains the similar dispersion state as that of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles. However, when the resistance to high temperature and salt of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is poor, the DLS particle diameter after a high temperature and salt resistance test is much larger, showing that the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is in a coagulated state.
For the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles if the ratio of the DLS average particle diameter after a high temperature and salt resistance test to the DLS average particle diameter of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is 1.5 or less (ratio of change of average particle diameter is 50% or less), the conclusion reached is that the resistance to high temperature and salt is good. If the ratio of the DLS average particle diameter after a high temperature and salt resistance test to the DLS average particle diameter of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is 1.1 or less (ratio of change of average particle diameter is 10% or less) there is no degradation of silica sol, the conclusion reached is that the resistance to high temperature and salt is very good.
After multiple tests of proposed brine resistant silica sols, it has been discovered that brine resistance of aqueous colloidal silica can be improved over untreated colloidal silica by addition of certain types of organic surface treatment. There are many different types of organic surface treatments that can be used. What follows are tables showing formulations for many acceptable surface-treated colloidal silicas. These brine resistant silica sols are also known as “surface functionalized” colloidal silicas.
In the following potential examples, each ingredient that is used to create a surface treated colloidal silica, is listed as Parts of Ingredient, per 100 parts of surface treated colloidal silica.
ST-O25 and ST-32C are commercially available colloidal silicas from Nissan Chemical America Corporation, located at 10333 Richmond Avenue, Suite 1100 Houston, Tex. 77042 or from Nissan Chemical Corporation, located at 5-1, Nihonbashi 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-6119, Japan.
Examples
Ingredients
1
2
3
4
5
6
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
2.9
1.9
1.9
Succinic Anhydride
N-(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-O-
2.9
Polyethyleneoxide Urethane
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
2.9
(oxiranyl methoxy)propyl]
3-Ureidopropyl
2.9
Triethoxysilane
2-(3,4 epoxycyclohexyl)-
1
ethyltrimethoxysilane
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
Methacrylate
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Succinic Anhydride
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Hexamethyl Disilazane
1
Trimethoxy Methyl Silane
1
Trimethoxy Phenyl Silane
1
Vinyl Trimethoxysilane
1
3-(N,N-DimethylaminoPropyl)-
1
Trimethoxysilane
3-(Diethylamino)propyl
1
trimethoxysilane
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Examples
Ingredients
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Succinic Anhydride
Trimethoxy(octadecyl)silane
1
Isobutyl Trimethoxysilane
1
Hexyltrimethoxysilane
1
Decyltrimethoxysilane
1
Isooctyltrimethoxysilane
1
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
1
Propyltrimethoxysilane
1
Octyltriethoxysilane
1
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Examples
Ingredients
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ST-O25
70
80
75
72
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
14.1
19.1
11.1
13.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11
Propylene Glycol
13
8
10
12
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
2.9
Succinic Anhydride
N-(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
2.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
3.9
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl
3-Ureidopropyl
2.9
Triethoxysilane
2-(3,4 epoxycyclohexyl)-
1
ethyltrimethoxysilane
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
1
Methacrylate
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Hexamethyl Disilazane
1
Trimethoxy Methyl
Silane
1
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Examples
Ingredient
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
N-(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Trimethoxy Phenyl Silane
1
Vinyl Trimethoxysilane
1
3-(N,N-
1
Dimethylaminopropyl)-
Trimethoxysilane
3-(Diethylamino)propyl
1
trimethoxysilane
Trimethoxy-
1
(octadecyl)silane
Isobutyl Trimethoxysilane
1
Hexyl-trimethoxysilane
1
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Examples
Ingredients
38
39
40
41
42
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
N-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Decyl-
1
trimethoxysilane
Isooctyl-
1
trimethoxysilane
Hexadecyl-
1
trimethoxysilane
Propyl-
1
trimethoxysilane
Octyl-triethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
ST-O25
76
76
70
80
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
10
9
16.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11
Propylene Glycol
11.1
12.1
11
6
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
2.9
Succinic Anhydride
N-(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
2.9
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Silane,trimethoxy[3-
2.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl
3-Ureidopropyl
2.9
Triethoxysilane
2-(3,4 epoxycyclohexyl)-
1
ethyltrimethoxysilane
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
1
Methacrylate
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Hexamethyl Disilazane
Trimethoxy Methyl
1
Silane
1
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Examples
Ingredient
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(oxiranyl methoxy)propyl
Trimethoxy Phenyl Silane
1
Vinyl Trimethoxysilane
1
3-(N,N-
1
Dimethylaminopropyl)-
Trimethoxysilane
3-(Diethylamino)propyl
1
trimethoxysilane
Trimethoxy(octadecyl)silane
1
Isobutyl Trimethoxysilane
1
Hexyltrimethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
59
60
61
62
63
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(oxiranyl methoxy)propyl
Decyltrimethoxysilane
1
Isooctyltrimethoxysilane
1
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
1
Propyltrimethoxysilane
1
Octyltriethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
1.45
Succinic Anhydride
N-
1.45
2.9
(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
2.9
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl
3-Ureidopropyl
2.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Triethoxysilane
2-(3,4
epoxycyclohexyl)-
1
ethyltrimethoxysilane
3-
(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
1
Methacrylate
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Hexamethyl Disilazane
1
Trimethoxy Methyl
1
Silane
Trimethoxy Phenyl
1
Silane
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Examples
Ingredients
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-Ureidopropyl
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Triethoxysilane
Vinyl Trimethoxysilane
1
3-(N,N-
1
Dimethylaminopropyl)-
Trimethoxysilane
3-(Diethylamino)propyl
1
trimethoxysilane
Trimethoxy(octadecyl)silane
1
Isobutyl Trimethoxysilane
1
Hexyltrimethoxysilane
1
Decyltrimethoxysilane
1
Isooctyltrimethoxysilane
1
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
Propyltrimethoxysilane
Octyltriethoxysilane
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
82
83
84
ST-O25
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
Propylene Glycol
10
10
10
3-Ureidopropyl
1.9
1.9
1.9
Triethoxysilane
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
1
Propyltrimethoxysilane
1
Octyltriethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
85
86
87
88
89
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
3-
2.9
1.9
(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
Succinic Anhydride
N-
2.9
(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
2.9
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl]
3-Ureidopropyl
2.9
Triethoxysilane
2-(3,4
1
epoxycyclohexyl)-
ethyltrimethoxysilane
3-
(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
Methacrylate
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
Hexamethyl Disilazane
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
90
91
92
ST-O25
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
3-
1.9
1.9
1.9
(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
Succinic Anhydride
3-
1
(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
Methacrylate
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Hexamethyl Disilazane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
Succinic Anhydride
Trimethoxy Methyl
1
Silane
Trimethoxy Phenyl
1
Silane
Vinyl
Trimethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
100
101
102
103
104
105
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Succinic Anhydride
Hexyltrimethoxysilane
1
Decyltrimethoxysilane
1
Isooctyltrimethoxysilane
1
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
1
Propyltrimethoxysilane
1
Octyltriethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
ST-O25
78
74
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
8
12
10
10
10
10
10
3-(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
1.45
Succinic Anhydride
N-(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
1.45
1.45
1.9
1.9
1.9
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
1.45
1.45
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl
3-Ureidopropyl
1.45
1.45
Triethoxysilane
2-(3,4 epoxycyclohexyl)-
1.45
1
ethyltrimethoxysilane
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
1
Methacrylate
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
113
114
115
116
117
118
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
N-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Hexamethyl Disilazane
1
Trimethoxy Methyl
1
Silane
Trimethoxy Phenyl
1
Silane
Vinyl Trimethoxysilane
1
3-(N,N-
1
Dimethylaminopropy1)-
Trimethoxysilane
3-
1
(Diethylamino)propyl
trimethoxysilane
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
N-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Trimethoxy(octadecyl)
1
silane
Isobutyl
1
Trimethoxysilane
Hexyltrimethoxysilane
1
Decyltrimethoxysilane
1
Isooctyltrimethoxysilane
1
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
1
Propyltrimethoxysilane
1
Octyltriethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
ST-O25
76
76
78
74
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
9.1
9.1
12.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-
(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
Succinic Anhydride
1.45
N-
(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
1.45
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl
1.45
1.45
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
3-Ureidopropyl
Triethoxysilane
1.45
1.45
2-(3,4
Epoxycyclohexyl)-
ethyltrimethoxysilane
1.45
1
3-
(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
1.45
Methacrylate
1
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Hexamethyl Disilazane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(oxiranyl methoxy)propyl
Trimethoxy Methyl Silane
1
Trimethoxy Phenyl Silane
1
Vinyl Trimethoxysilane
1
3-(N,N-
1
Dimethylaminopropyl)-
Trimethoxysilane
3-(Diethylamino)propyl
1
trimethoxysilane
Trimethoxy(octadecyl)silane
1
Isobutyl Trimethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
142
143
144
145
146
147
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
(oxiranyl methoxy)propyl
Hexyltrimethoxysilane
1
Decyltrimethoxysilane
1
Isooctyltrimethoxysilane
1
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
1
Propyltrimethoxysilane
1
Octyltriethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
6.1
7.1
8.1
9.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
15
14
13
12
10
10
10
3-
2.9
(Triethoxysilyl)propyl
Succinic Anhydride
N-
2.9
(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-
O-Polyethyleneoxide
Urethane
Silane, trimethoxy[3-
2.9
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl
3-Ureidopropyl
2.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Triethoxysilane
2-(3,4
1
epoxycyclohexyl)-
ethyltrimethoxysilane
3-
1
(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl
Methacrylate
Hexamethyl Disiloxane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-Ureidopropyl
Triethoxysilane
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Hexamethyl Disilazane
1
Trimethoxy Methyl Silane
1
Trimethoxy Phenyl Silane
1
Vinyl Trimethoxysilane
1
3-(N,N-
1
Dimethylaminopropyl)-
Trimethoxysilane
3-(Diethylamino)propyl
1
trimethoxysilane
Trimethoxy(octadecyl)silane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Ingredients
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
ST-O25
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
Deionized water
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Ethylene Glycol
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3-Ureidopropyl
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Triethoxysilane
Isobutyl Trimethoxysilane
1
Hexyltrimethoxysilane
1
Decyltrimethoxysilane
1
Isooctyltrimethoxysilane
1
Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane
1
Propyltrimethoxysilane
1
Octyltriethoxysilane
1
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Description
Ingredients
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
Colloidal silica 25
ST-O-25
52.68
50
51
25
wt % silica solids
available from
Nissan Chemical
America
Alkaline Colloidal
ST-32C
59.28
48
45
25
Silica from Nissan
Chemical Company,
Japan
Deionized water
36.05
27.97
40
41.5
38.5
43
35
Propylene
8
7.5
8.5
Glycol
Ethylene Glycol
8.06
9.85
7.5
10
→
Silane,
trimethoxy[3-
(oxiranyl
methoxy)propyl
3.21
2.9
2.5
2.5
3
3.5
5
Total (g)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Brine resistant silica sols and hydrocarbon recovery fluids comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles, where the surface functionalized nanoparticles are brine resistant silica sols, can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/946,252; filed Apr. 5, 2018, entitled “Brine Resistant Silica Sols”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/946,338, filed Apr. 5, 2018, entitled “Hydrocarbon Formation Treatment Micellar Solutions”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/129,688; filed: Sep. 12, 2018, entitled “Crude Oil Recovery Chemical Fluids”, which application claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2017-175511; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/129,705; filed: Sep. 12, 2018, entitled “Crude Oil Recovery Chemical Fluid”, which application claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2017-175511; wherein all US Patent Applications are herein incorporated by reference, in their entirety.
When selecting/using a fluid to be used in the treatment of an oil and/or gas well, it is important for the fluid to have the right combination of additives and components to achieve the necessary characteristics of the specific end-use application. A primary goal amongst many aspects of hydrocarbon formation treatment is to optimize recovery of oil and/or gas from the formation. However, in part because the fluids utilized during the operation of an oil and/or gas well are often utilized to perform a number of tasks simultaneously, achieving necessary to optimal characteristics of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles is always challenging.
Additional commercially available compositions suitable for the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid include the nanoActiv® HRT product line available from Nissan Chemical America Corporation, located at 10333 Richmond Avenue, Suite 1100 Houston, Tex. 77042. These products, including developmental products that are currently being trialed, use nanosized particles in a colloidal dispersion, which allows the fluid to work by causing a Brownian-motion, diffusion-driven mechanism known as disjoining pressure to produce long efficacy in the recovery of hydrocarbons in conventional and unconventional reservoirs.
Current commercially available nanoActiv®HRT products, include, but are not limited to:
Additional Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluids comprising functionalized colloidal silica mixtures suitable for this invention include a crude oil recovery chemical solution which is excellent in resistance to high temperature and salt, characterized by containing a silane compound, an aqueous silica sol having an average particle size of from about 3 nm to about 200 nm.
In an embodiment of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles, the aqueous silica sol contains silica particles in which at least a part of the silane compound is bonded on the surface of at least a part of the silica particles in the sol.
In another embodiment of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles, the silane compound is at least one compound selected from the group consisting of a silane coupling agent having at least one organic functional group selected from the group consisting of a vinyl group, an ether group, an epoxy group, a styryl group, a methacryl group, an acryl group, an amino group and an isocyanurate group, an alkoxysilane group, a silazane group and a siloxane group.
In another embodiment of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles, aqueous silica sol is present in an amount of from about 0.1% by mass to about 20% by mass, based on the total mass of the crude oil recovery chemical solution, in terms of silica solid content.
In another embodiment of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles, the silane compound is present in a ratio of 0.1 to 3.0 of silane compound based on the mass of silica solid content of the aqueous silica sol.
In another embodiment of the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles, the surfactants are present in an amount of from about 2% by mass to about 50% by mass, based on the total mass of the crude oil recovery chemical solution.
Additional Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluids comprising containing surface functionalized colloidal silica mixtures suitable for this invention include a micellar dispersion fluid comprising:
(a) a terpene-based oil phase that includes less than about 20.0 wt. % d-limonene,
(b) one or more surfactants selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, nonionic surfactants and amphoteric surfactants;
(c) an alcohol selected from the group consisting of C1-C8 alcohols, such as, but not limited to ethylene glycol and isopropanol;
(d) an alcohol cosolvent, such as, but not limited to, ethyl-hexyl alcohols;
(e) water; and
(f) a functionalized aqueous colloidal silica, which must be a brine resistant surface functionalized colloidal silica.
In another embodiment of a Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid, which is a Micellar Dispersion, the Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprises surface functionalized nanoparticles, the fluid comprises:
(a) an oil fluid that is not a terpene,
(b) one or more surfactants selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, nonionic surfactants and amphoteric surfactants;
(c) an alcohol selected from the group consisting of C1-C8 alcohols; such as, but not limited to ethylene glycol and isopropanol;
(d) an alcohol cosolvent; such as, but not limited to, ethyl-hexyl alcohols;
(e) water; and
(f) a functionalized aqueous colloidal silica, which must be a brine resistant surface functionalized colloidal silica.
Examples of potentially suitable Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluids comprising brine resistant silica sols are in the following tables.
Examples
Supplier
Chemistry
Ingredients
A
B
C
D
NCAC
Any of
Surface Treated
Examples 1-175
Silicasol
79.00
84.50
84.00
84.00
NaOH (1%)
10.00
10.00
9.00
9.50
Akzo
Nonionic
Ethylan 1206
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
Nobel
Stepan
Nonionic
BioSoft N91-6
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
Stepan
Alkyl Olefin Sulfonate
BioTerge AS-40
5.5
Stepan
Cocamidopropyl
Petrostep SB
4.60
4.60
Sultaine
Stepan
Lauramidopropyl
Amphosol LB
5.60
Betaine
Stepan
Cocamidopropyl
PetroStep CG-50
5.10
Betaine
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Supplier
Chemistry
Ingredients
E
F
G
H
NCAC
Any of
Surface Treated
84.90
84.60
83.6
83.00
Examples 1-175
Silicasol
NaOH (1%)
10.00
10.00
10
9.50
Akzo
Nonionic
Ethylan 1206
0.40
0.40
0.4
Nobel
Evonik
Nonionic
Surfynol 420
0.50
Stepan
Nonionic
BioSoft N91-6
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Stepan
Alkyl Olefin
BioTerge AS-40
5
6.00
Sulfonate
Stepan
Blended Betaine
PetroStep MME 50
3.70
Stepan
Sodium Trideceth
Cedepal TD 407
4.00
Sulfate
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Supplier
Chemistry
Ingredients
I
J
K
L
NCAC
Any of
Surface Treated Silicasol
84.00
84.00
84.00
84.00
Examples 1-175
NaOH (1%)
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Stepan
Nonionic
BioSoft N91-6
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
Stepan
Alkyl Olefin Sulfonate
BioTerge AS-40
5.5
Croda
Ethoxylated Castor Oil
Etocas 200 SO MV
5.00
Croda
Ethoxylated Castor Oil
Etocas 29 LQ RB
5.00
Croda
Ethoxylated Castor Oil
Etocas 35 LQ MH
5.00
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Supplier
Chemistry
Ingredients
M
N
O
NCAC
Any of
Surface Treated Silicasol
84.00
84.00
84.00
Examples 1-175
NaOH (1%)
10.00
10.00
10.00
Evonik
Nonionic
Surfynol 420
5
Stepan
Nonionic
BioSoft N91-6
1.00
1.00
1.00
Stepan
Alkyl Olefin Sulfonate
BioTerge AS-40
5.00
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
Examples
Supplier
Ingredients
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
Brine Resistant
Surface
21
20.5
16.5
14.4
Silica Sol made
Treated
from ST-32C
Silicasol
available from
Nissan Chemical
Corporation Ltd.
Brine Resistant
Surface
42
37.4
33.5
29.4
Silica Sol made
Treated
from ST-O25
Silicasol
available from
Nissan Chemical
America
Corporation
Dipentene (oil
VertecBio
0.5
1.05
1
1.1
0.5
1.05
1
1.1
phase) available
DLR
from Vertec
Biosolvents
Methyl Soyate
VertecBio
11
11.5
12
12.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
(oil phase)
Gold
Water
Any Source
9
6
7
8
9
8
7
6
Isopropanol
Any Supplier
10
11
12
13
13
12
11
10
Alkyl Olefin
AOS-40
39
40
41
40
15
20
25
30
Sulfonate, 40%
Actives available
from Solvay
Nonionic
Ethylan 1206
9.5
10
10.5
11
9.5
10
10.5
11
surfactant
available from
AkzoNobel
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
The gas is selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas, liquified carbon dioxide and/or mixtures thereof. The motility of the gas is used to distribute the nanoparticles more effectively and push them deeper into the formation, allowing the gas and nanoparticles to maximize their production enhancement capabilities. Successful treatment enhances production for six months or more thanks to the effective penetration and residual value of the nanoparticles. This process is extremely flexible and can therefore be used with all types of wells, including conventional, unconventional and oil and gas wells.
The first generation of nanoActiv® HRT nanoparticles are designed specifically to be used in combination with carbon dioxide, nitrogen, natural gas, liquified natural gas, liquified carbon dioxide and/or mixtures thereof. The first generation of nanoActiv® HRT is not designed to work well with Steam. Steam is not required or desirable to be used in combination with the first generation of nanoActiv® HRT patent pending technology. Steam remains a potential gas for use in combination with future generations of Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluids comprising surface functionalized nanoparticle products.
The gas itself delivers a range of benefits, for example:
RECHARGE HNP™ is the tradename for a prescribed, simple, flexible remediation treatment for wells consisting of the three Huff′ n Puff phases: injection, soaking and production. Thanks to the synergies between the developmental nanoActiv® Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluids comprising surface functionalized nanoparticle products and the gas, the soak times can be dramatically reduced compared with traditional HNP treatments. Depending on the type of formation, well history and identified issues, a specific treatment plan is prescribed.
RECHARGE HNP™ treatment comprises a three-phase process of
1) screening the well candidates,
2) specifying and prescribing the treatment, and
3) implementing the treatment.
This also includes monitoring post-treatment production up to 180 days to determine the most suitable next-stage treatment. Wells must be screened and analyzed to ensure the correct treatment is applied. This is vital to ensuring the treatment has the desired effect on productivity. Table α following highlights the current screening criteria:
TABLE α
Well screening criteria for RECHARGE HNP ™
Production
Good initial production (IP) with gradual decline curve
that indicates continuous well depletion, wettability
issues
Current production <10-20% of IP and preferably
>5-10 BOPD or 20 mscfd
Field data
Well performance should be on par with other wells in
the field; thief zones and extensive fractures need
to be understood
Treatments
Acid and other chemical treatments may negatively
impact properties of nanoActiv ®
Well equipment
To be in good mechanical condition. Pumps, linings,
gaskets. Ensure pressure tested or assurance for
pressure treating levels.
Water
Too high content of salts (e.g. KOI) and TDS may
negatively impact nanoActiv ®
Water cut
<80% (N2), <90% (CO2) ideal, may go higher with
greater treatment dosages
Net Pay Zone
<100 ft (30 m) vertical to optimize 60-90 days
pay-back.
Porosity
Porosity/>8% conventional, >4% unconventional
Oil
Oil gravity <30 API, CO2 preferred
Avoid asphaltenes precipitation conditions
This example describes work done in combining nitrogen and a developmental nanoActiv® Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid product comprising brine resistant silicasol nanoparticles, sodium hydroxide, one anionic surfactant and one nonionic surfactant in the Austin Chalk and Buda formations.
This case study focuses on a number of aged, depleted wells (some shut-in) in the Buda and Austin Chalk formations in Central Texas (USA). These wells are horizontal open-hole completions. Prior to this work, the operator of the wells initially injected small amounts of N2 into each well (60 tons per well) to try to improve productivity.
A developmental nanoActiv® Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid product previously described is used in combination with nitrogen as a way of achieving better, longer-lasting results.
The process for treatment of each well is as follows:
Field Treatment Program
Five wells are treated with various amounts of developmental nanoActiv® Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface functionalized nanoparticles along with a constant volume of 60 tons of Nitrogen per well.
The well candidates, Nitrogen volumes and stages of injection are chosen by the operator.
The following is a summary of the well treatment for each of the identified wells:
After monitoring productivity for 180 days after treatment and thoroughly analyzing the production results, several observations are recorded. All five wells respond to the treatment. Looking at the dosage of treatment relative to the treatment area, there is a direct, one-to-one correlation between dosage and treatment response. The areas that receive the higher doses of gas and nanoparticles produce better results.
The responses of four of the five wells, two in Austin Chalk and two in Buda, are shown in
In addition to the direct correlation between the dosage applied to the wells and their responses (improvement in hydrocarbon production expressed as a percentage), there is also a direct correlation between the dosage and the duration of the treatment response. This can be seen in Table β.
TABLE β
Correlation between the treatment dosage Nitrogen and developmental
nanoActv ® Hydrocarbon Recovery Fluid comprising surface
functionalized nanoparticles) in the Austin Chalk and Buda wells and
the well production response and the duration of the response.
High Correlation Between Dosage and Yield
Treatment
production
Dosage of
Well
response
treatment
response
(days)
(ranking)
(ranking)
Buda, Well A
90
3
4
Buda, Well B
180
1
1
Austin Chalk, Well A
90
4
3
Austin Chalk, Well B
180
2
2
RECHARGE HNP™ is a multi-spectrum, proprietary remediation treatment for wells with a range of production problems. Combining the properties of gas and nanoparticles creates a unique, synergistic treatment that addresses several potential production issues simultaneously, while being less cost-intensive than alternative solutions. The extended scope is extremely useful because wells often experience a combination of issues that lead to a decline in productivity or, in many cases, operators do not know the full extent of the downhole problems.
Successful treatments enhance production by six months or more, thus reducing periodicity of repeated treatments. RECHARGE HNP™ is highly flexible and easy to implement: it can be used with all types of wells, including conventional, unconventional and oil and gas wells.
While the foregoing disclosure discusses illustrative aspects and/or embodiments, it should be noted that various changes and modifications could be made herein without departing from the scope of the described aspects and/or embodiments as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, although elements of the described aspects and/or embodiments may be described or claimed in the singular, the plural is contemplated unless limitation to the singular is explicitly stated. Additionally, all or a portion of any aspect and/or embodiment may be utilized with all or a portion of any other aspect and/or embodiment, unless stated otherwise. All patents, patent applications, and references cited anywhere in this disclosure are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Watts, Kevin, Southwell, John Edmond, Aslam, Naveed, Watts, Robin, Holcomb, David, Ahmad, Yusra Khan
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 11896938, | Oct 13 2021 | Disruptive Oil and Gas Technologies Corp | Nanobubble dispersions generated in electrochemically activated solutions |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10113406, | Sep 21 2017 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Pulsed hydraulic fracturing with nanosilica carrier fluid |
| 10160682, | Apr 23 2014 | Dow Global Technologies LLC | Inhibtion of silica scale using hydrophobically-modified alkylene oxide urethane copolymer |
| 10377942, | Apr 06 2017 | Nissan Chemical America Corporation | Hydrocarbon formation treatment micellar solutions |
| 10557078, | Apr 06 2017 | Nissan Chemical America Corporation | Brine resistant silica sol |
| 10563117, | Sep 13 2017 | Nissan Chemical America Corporation | Crude oil recovery chemical fluids |
| 10570331, | Sep 13 2017 | Nissan Chemical America Corporation | Crude oil recovery chemical fluid |
| 10570715, | Aug 18 2017 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | Unconventional reservoir enhanced or improved oil recovery |
| 3506070, | |||
| 3613786, | |||
| 3623553, | |||
| 3740343, | |||
| 3885628, | |||
| 3981361, | Jul 31 1975 | Exxon Production Research Company | Oil recovery method using microemulsions |
| 4240504, | Dec 21 1978 | Exxon Production Research Company | Simultaneous microemulsion-aqueous phase flooding process |
| 4328106, | Jun 13 1980 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Method for inhibiting silica precipitation and scaling in geothermal flow systems |
| 4348462, | Mar 11 1980 | General Electric Company | Abrasion resistant ultraviolet light curable hard coating compositions |
| 4390068, | Apr 03 1981 | Champlin Petroleum Company | Carbon dioxide stimulated oil recovery process |
| 4892146, | Dec 19 1988 | Texaco, Inc. | Alkaline polymer hot water oil recovery process |
| 5168082, | Aug 12 1991 | Ecolab USA Inc | Functionalized colloidal silica sol as a ceramics additive |
| 5381863, | Jan 13 1994 | Texaco Inc. | Cyclic huff-n-puff with immiscible injection and miscible production steps |
| 6863985, | Oct 31 2001 | WACKER Chemie AG | Hydrophobicized copolymers |
| 7033975, | May 24 2002 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Use of surface-modified nanoparticles for oil recovery |
| 7101616, | Sep 11 2001 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Smudge resistant nanocomposite hardcoats and methods for making same |
| 7216712, | Dec 10 2003 | PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC | Treatment of oil wells |
| 7380606, | Mar 01 2002 | Flotek Chemistry, LLC | Composition and process for well cleaning |
| 7482310, | Nov 12 2003 | NEXTIER COMPLETION SOLUTIONS INC | Method of fracturing subterranean formations utilizing emulsions comprising acrylamide copolymers |
| 7544726, | Oct 14 2002 | NOURYON CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL B V | Colloidal silica composition |
| 7553888, | Oct 14 2002 | NOURYON CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL B V | Aqueous dispersion |
| 8101812, | Sep 20 2007 | Green Source Holdings LLC | Extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials |
| 8272442, | Sep 20 2007 | Green Source Holdings LLC | In situ extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials |
| 8404107, | Sep 20 2007 | Green Source Holdings LLC | Extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials |
| 8522876, | Sep 20 2007 | Green Source Holdings LLC | In situ extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials |
| 8685234, | Sep 20 2007 | Green Source Holdings LLC | Extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials and/or processing of hydrocarbon-containing materials |
| 9068108, | Mar 14 2013 | CESI CHEMICAL INC ; CESI CHEMICAL, INC | Methods and compositions for stimulating the production of hydrocarbons from subterranean formations |
| 9181468, | Sep 20 2007 | Green Source Holdings LLC | Extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials and/or processing of hydrocarbon-containing materials |
| 9321955, | Jun 14 2013 | CESI CHEMICAL, INC | Methods and compositions for stimulating the production of hydrocarbons from subterranean formations |
| 9428683, | Mar 14 2013 | Flotek Chemistry, LLC | Methods and compositions for stimulating the production of hydrocarbons from subterranean formations |
| 9464223, | Mar 14 2013 | CESI CHEMICAL, INC | Methods and compositions for use in oil and/or gas wells |
| 9505970, | May 14 2014 | CESI CHEMICAL, INC | Methods and compositions for use in oil and/or gas wells |
| 9512352, | May 10 2007 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Well treatment fluids and methods utilizing nano-particles |
| 9708525, | Jan 31 2014 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Methods of using nano-surfactants for enhanced hydrocarbon recovery |
| 9725999, | Jul 27 2011 | World Energy Systems Incorporated | System and methods for steam generation and recovery of hydrocarbons |
| 9790414, | May 14 2014 | Flotek Chemistry, LLC | Methods and compositions for use in oil and/or gas wells |
| 9850418, | Mar 14 2013 | Flotek Chemistry, LLC | Methods and compositions for use in oil and/or gas wells |
| 9868893, | Mar 14 2013 | CESI CHEMICAL, INC | Methods and compositions for use in oil and/or gas wells |
| 9884988, | Mar 14 2013 | CESI CHEMICAL, INC | Methods and compositions for use in oil and/or gas wells |
| 20030220204, | |||
| 20040077768, | |||
| 20040097600, | |||
| 20060260815, | |||
| 20070238088, | |||
| 20080289828, | |||
| 20100096139, | |||
| 20100147515, | |||
| 20110220360, | |||
| 20120024530, | |||
| 20120168165, | |||
| 20120175120, | |||
| 20130341020, | |||
| 20140008067, | |||
| 20140116695, | |||
| 20140162911, | |||
| 20140284053, | |||
| 20140332218, | |||
| 20140338906, | |||
| 20140338911, | |||
| 20140374095, | |||
| 20150068744, | |||
| 20150068755, | |||
| 20150218435, | |||
| 20150268370, | |||
| 20150292308, | |||
| 20160017204, | |||
| 20160137907, | |||
| 20160194550, | |||
| 20160362594, | |||
| 20160369158, | |||
| 20170306219, | |||
| 20180291255, | |||
| 20180291261, | |||
| 20190078015, | |||
| 20190078016, | |||
| 20190093462, | |||
| 20190136123, | |||
| 20190225871, | |||
| 20190382645, | |||
| 20200123435, | |||
| CN101735787, | |||
| CN102838981, | |||
| CN106085401, | |||
| EP1509676, | |||
| EP1818693, | |||
| EP2465911, | |||
| JP10111544, | |||
| JP1035157, | |||
| JP1234468, | |||
| JP2004150859, | |||
| JP331380, | |||
| JP4033970, | |||
| JP5026264, | |||
| JP5086989, | |||
| KR101872020, | |||
| WO1995011280, | |||
| WO2003100214, | |||
| WO2005018300, | |||
| WO2009044912, | |||
| WO2010103020, | |||
| WO2013192634, | |||
| WO2014153102, | |||
| WO2014176188, | |||
| WO2014201367, | |||
| WO2014204709, | |||
| WO2016040742, | |||
| WO2016205289, | |||
| WO2017011328, | |||
| WO2017023665, | |||
| WO2017062086, | |||
| WO2018004560, | |||
| WO2018157099, | |||
| WO2018187550, | |||
| WO2018187563, | |||
| WO2019054414, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Sep 25 2018 | Nissan Chemcial America Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Sep 25 2018 | Messer Industries USA, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Jan 09 2019 | WATTS, KEVIN | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048188 | /0228 | |
| Jan 29 2019 | WATTS, ROBIN | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048188 | /0228 | |
| Jan 30 2019 | ASLAM, NAVEED | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048188 | /0228 | |
| Jun 04 2019 | SOUTHWELL, JOHN EDMOND | Nissan Chemical America Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 049401 | /0734 | |
| Jun 05 2019 | AHMAD, YUSRA KHAN | Nissan Chemical America Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 049401 | /0734 | |
| Jun 06 2019 | HOLCOMB, DAVID L | Nissan Chemical America Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 049401 | /0734 | |
| Aug 08 2019 | LINDELINDE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | MESSER INDUSTRIES USA, INC | NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050045 | /0114 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Sep 25 2018 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
| Apr 15 2024 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 13 2023 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 13 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 13 2024 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 13 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 13 2027 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 13 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 13 2028 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 13 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 13 2031 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 13 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 13 2032 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 13 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |