An audio speaker includes an enclosure having a coupling chamber and a loading chamber, at least m radiating drivers, and at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s), wherein m is at least two. The coupling chamber acts to couple the at least m radiating drivers and the at least m−1 loading driver(s), for example, and the loading chamber acts to load the loading driver(s). The at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) may have a higher sensitivity than the at least m radiating drivers and the at least m radiating drivers may be arranged within the enclosure to minimize a volume of the coupling chamber. In other embodiments, the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) may be other types of inducers (e.g., an undriven loading driver(s), a drone cone, a port, or combinations thereof).
|
1. An audio speaker, comprising:
an enclosure including a sealed coupling chamber;
at least m radiating drivers in communication with the coupling chamber; and
at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) in communication with the coupling chamber;
wherein m is at least two and all radiating drivers in communication with the coupling chamber operate in common acoustic phase.
2. The audio speaker of
3. The audio speaker of
5. The audio speaker of
6. The audio speaker of
7. The audio speaker of
8. The audio speaker of
9. The audio speaker of
10. The audio speaker of
11. The audio speaker of
12. The audio speaker of
13. The audio speaker of
14. The audio speaker of
15. The audio speaker of
16. The audio speaker of
17. The audio speaker of
18. The audio speaker of
19. The audio speaker of
20. The audio speaker of
21. The audio speaker of
22. The audio speaker of
23. The audio speaker of
24. The audio speaker of
25. The audio speaker of
26. The audio speaker of
27. The audio speaker of
28. The audio speaker of
|
This is a utility application of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/730,582 filed on Sep. 13, 2018.
This document relates generally to the audio loudspeaker arts, and more specifically to a loaded audio loudspeaker.
This invention relates to audio loudspeakers, and in particular to reducing the size of the loudspeaker without sacrificing sound pressure level (SPL) or clarity in order to improve mobility and placement flexibility. Mobility is important for applications like a disc jockey who moves equipment from one venue to the next. A smaller loudspeaker with equivalent performance to its larger competitor would offer a significant advantage as it would be easier to transport and setup. Similarly, placement of loudspeakers is an important consideration for permanent installations and smaller loudspeakers would allow more flexibility. For instance, smaller loudspeakers would allow more flexibility of arrangement of equipment and performers on a crowded stage. Further, while it is a necessity that the loudspeakers be adequately heard, their presence is often a visual distraction for both mobile and installed applications. Hence, a smaller loudspeaker with equivalent performance is very desirable.
A key element of audio loudspeakers is the transducer, commonly called a driver, which is a device whose movement causes changes in sound pressure that reproduce the desired music or sound. As is known in the art, a typical driver has a voice coil and magnet, which act together when an electrical signal is applied to make a cone, or diaphragm, move back and forth causing sound pressure waves. Each of these components is typically supported by a basket. The driver has two faces. The front or radiating face is open to the listening space and serves the purpose of radiating sound waves to the listener's ear. The back or non-radiating face is typically enclosed by an air space chamber in order to obtain a desired frequency response. The common phrase used to describe the function of the air space chamber is that it loads the driver. In other words, the air space chamber is a loading chamber.
The loading chamber can be either sealed or ported, horn/scoop loaded, or loaded in a transmission line. When sealed, the non-radiating face does not directly contribute to the sound waves heard by the listener. When ported, air mass in the port or mass in a drone cone resonates with the driver at a specific frequency. When loaded in a transmission line or horn, low frequency sound waves are typically allowed to escape the loading chamber into the listening space through an opening in the loading chamber. Together, the driver and its loading chamber are called a loudspeaker.
The overall size of audio loudspeakers is primarily determined by the size of the selected driver, or drivers, and the air space needed to load the driver(s). Driver size increases with increasing specified SPL and with decreasing specified frequency; therefore, a driver to reproduce bass tones for an auditorium is quite large compared to a high frequency driver intended for a small room. Generally, the loading chamber size increases with the driver diameter. The loading chamber volume in such loudspeakers, Vb, is determined by the following characteristics/parameters of the driver and the desired speaker response near its resonant frequency:
Driver Surface Area (Sd)—loading chamber increases with square of Sd;
Driver Free-Air Resonance Frequency (Fs)—loading chamber decreases with square of Fs;
Driver Air Mass Compliance (Mms)—loading chamber decreases with Mms;
Driver Free-Air Resonance Amplitude Coefficient (Qts)—loading chamber increases with Qts; and
Desired Speaker Resonance Amplitude Coefficient (Qtc)—loading chamber decreases with Qtc.
The equations that relate the above parameters to the loading chamber size, Vb, are:
Vb=Vas/((Qtc/Qts)2−1); (1) and
Vas=k*Sd2/(Mms*Fs2). (2)
Since the driver surface area Sd is a function of the square of the driver radius, it can be readily appreciated from examining the above equations that the loading chamber volume, Vb, is dominated by driver diameter since Vb is related to the 4th power of driver radius; therefore, the primary means to reduce the overall loudspeaker size for a given driver, or drivers, is to reduce the loading chamber volume.
As shown in
When an array of radiating drivers is being discussed, it is important to understand whether the drivers are operating in common acoustic phase or in opposing acoustic phase. Acoustic phase is in reference to the polarity of the sound pressure wave radiating into a listening space where the sound is received by a listener and is a combination of both mechanical and electrical phase of the drivers. The possible combinations of mechanical and electrical phase and the resulting acoustic phase are shown in Table 1 below for an array of at least two drivers which share a common air space.
TABLE 1
Configuration
Mechanical Phase
Electrical Phase
Acoustic Phase
1
Drivers face same way
Drivers wired same polarity
Common
2
Drivers face same way
Drivers wired opposite polarity
Opposing
3
Drivers face opposite
Drivers wired same polarity
Opposing
4
Drivers face opposite
Drivers wired opposite polarity
Common
The most widely used configuration is Configuration 1 of Table 1 wherein the drivers in an array face the same way, are wired in the same polarity, and both drivers radiate. An isobaric design in which one driver radiates and another driver loads can use either Configuration 1 or 4.
For illustration in determining Vb for a given array of drivers, consider the loading chamber volume for an array of four 10″ drivers in which each driver has the parameter values shown in Table 2 and a desired loudspeaker Qtc is 0.65.
TABLE 2
Driver Array
Sd
Fs
Qts
Specification
Area of Cone
Resonant Frequency
Resonant Peak
(4) ″ Radiating
358 cm
37.7 Hz
0.26
The loading chamber volume for the array shown in
Vas=k*Sd2/(Mms*Fs2)=36*3582/(53*37.702)=61.2 liters (2)
Vb=Vas/((Qtc/Qts)2−1)=61.2/((0.65/0.26)2−1)=10.2 liters (1)
As shown, a loading chamber of 10.2 liters is required per radiating driver 12; therefore, the configuration in
Similarly, a combined loading chamber for all four drivers 12, as shown in
Vas=k*(4*Sd2)/((4*Mms)*Fs2)=36*((4*358)2)/(4*53)*37.72)=244.8 liters (2)
Vb=Vas/((Qtc/Qts)2−1)=244.8/((0.651.26)2−1)=40.8 liters (1)
As determined, the configurations of driver arrays in
One long understood but sparingly used approach to lowering loading chamber volume is referred to as isobaric. In an isobaric speaker 18, as noted above and generally shown in
In a subwoofer loudspeaker, where a mid-range output is not needed, the optimum driver arrangement is front to front, i.e., an outer cone of one driver faces another outer cone of the other driver and the drivers are wired out of phase. In isobaric designs, the drivers are placed either cone to magnet and wired in phase with one another, or cone to cone or magnet to magnet and wired out of phase with one another so that their cones move together when driven with an audio signal. The term isobaric points to the somewhat erroneous notion that the air pressure in the sealed chamber between the drivers is constant (e.g., the isobaric condition), when in fact there will be small changes due to the differences in the drivers technical parameters and the air that each is pressurizing. One driver will be pressurizing the air in the listening room, while the other is pressurizing a smaller volume of air in the speaker enclosure.
The two drivers operating in tandem exhibit a similar behavior to that of one driver operating in twice the cabinet. The cabinet or loading chamber is defined as the air space behind the rear or loading driver. The volume of air between the speakers has no acoustic effect on the loading chamber space so that the saved space is less than fifty percent. Other aspects are unchanged like resonant frequency and maximum SPL. The new driver will have the same resonant frequency, Qts, excursion, etc. as one driver with the same applied signal. With optimal out of phase designs, distortion is slightly reduced due to the cancellation of suspension and other driver non-linearities. Because the impedance is also halved, the performance of an isobaric speaker is achieved with twice the power. The new efficiency is thus 3 dB lower than with one loudspeaker. The reason for the unchanged resonance frequency is simple: the new combined loudspeaker has twice the moving mass compared to the single driver but also half the compliance because of the doubled suspension.
The result is that the coupled driver pair (iso-group) can now produce the same frequency response in half the box volume that a single driver of the same type would require. For example, if a speaker is optimized for performance in a 40 liter enclosure, one iso-group of the same speakers can achieve the same low frequency extension and overall response characteristics in a 20 liter enclosure. The aforementioned volumes exclude the isobaric chamber. If the iso group is placed in the original 40 liter, the loading will be incorrect (if the 40 liter was a correct loading of the loudspeaker).
A critical review of isobaric loudspeakers reveals that isobaric loudspeakers are limited to the following: (1) bass applications only; (2) a single radiating driver radiating into a listening space and a single loading driver; and (3) the radiating and loading drivers must be identical. These limitations are very restrictive and significantly limit the possible solutions for reducing a loading chamber size. Accordingly, a more robust design is needed which operates across all frequency ranges, not just bass. In addition, many loudspeaker applications would benefit from having an array of radiating drivers to produce the sound volume and quality that is desired instead of just a single driver.
While multiple isobaric pairs could be utilized to provide the desired array in a reduced enclosure size, the reduction requires the addition of four drivers in a one-to-one ratio with the radiating drivers which significantly increases the cost and weight of the loudspeaker. Consider the required loading chamber volume for an array of four isobaric pairs 26, as shown in
TABLE 3
Sd
Fs
Mms
Qts
Isobaric Driver
Area of
Resonant
Air Mass
Resonant
Array Specification
Cone
Frequency
Equivalent
Peak
(4) 10″ Radiating
358 cm
37.7 Hz
53 g
0.26
(4) 10″ Loading
358 cm
37.7 Hz
53 g
0.26
According to conventional isobaric loading chamber volume calculations, the Mms of the system is the combined Mms of the radiating and loading drivers. Further, the Sd, Fs, and Qts of the system are the same as for a single driver as both the radiating and loading drivers are the same. It should be noted, however, that the conventional method of calculating Vb does not contemplate a case where the radiating and loading drives do not have the same, or nearly the same, parameter values as discussed further below.
Plugging the values for Sd, Fs, and 2*Mms for each driver pair into equation 2 yields a result of:
Vas=k*Sd2/(2*Mms*Fs2)=36*3582/(2*53*37.702)=30.6 liters (2)
Vb=Vas/((Qtc/Qts)2−1)=30.6/((0.65/0.26)2−1)=5.2 liters (1)
In other words, a loading chamber volume for each isobaric pair in the array configuration shown in
Accordingly, a need exists in the loudspeaker industry for an audio loudspeaker having a reduced loading chamber size for an array of drivers capable of producing high quality sound over a wide listening frequency range and without the costs of an additional loading driver for each radiating driver.
In accordance with the purposes and benefits described herein, an audio speaker is provided. The audio speaker may be broadly described as comprising an enclosure including a coupling chamber and a loading chamber, at least m radiating drivers and at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s), wherein m is at least two.
In another possible embodiment, the coupling chamber acts to couple a non-radiating face of the at least m radiating drivers and a face of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
In yet another possible embodiment, the loading chamber acts to load a face of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
In still another possible embodiment, each of the at least m radiating drivers radiate into a listening space.
In one other possible embodiment, at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) communicates with the loading chamber.
In yet still another possible embodiment, a volume of the loading chamber is substantially the same as a volume of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
In another possible embodiment, at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
In yet another possible embodiment, the at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is larger in size than the at least m radiating drivers.
In still another possible embodiment, the loading chamber includes a port and the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
In one other possible embodiment, the loading chamber includes a port and the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) communicates with the coupling chamber.
In another possible embodiment, the loading chamber includes a drone cone and the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
In still another possible embodiment, the loading chamber includes a drone cone and the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) communicates with the coupling chamber.
In one additional possible embodiment, the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) have a higher sensitivity than each of the at least m radiating drivers.
In one other possible embodiment, the at least m radiating drivers are arranged within the enclosure to minimize a volume of the coupling chamber.
In accordance with another possible embodiment, an audio speaker includes an enclosure including a coupling chamber and a loading chamber, first and second radiating drivers, and a loading driver having a diameter at least as large as a diameter of either of the first and second radiating drivers and a sensitivity at least as high as a sensitivity of either of the first and second radiating drivers.
In another possible embodiment, the coupling chamber acts to couple a non-radiating face of the first and second radiating drivers and the loading driver.
In yet another possible embodiment, the loading chamber acts to load a face of the loading driver.
In still another possible embodiment, the first and second radiating drivers radiate into a listening space.
In one other possible embodiment, the loading driver communicates with the loading chamber.
In yet still another possible embodiment, a volume of the loading chamber is substantially the same as a volume of the loading driver.
In another possible embodiment, the loading driver is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
In still another possible embodiment, the loading driver is larger in size than either of the first and second radiating drivers.
In another possible embodiment, the loading chamber includes one of a port or a drone cone.
In yet another possible embodiment, the loading driver has a higher sensitivity than either of the first and second radiating drivers.
In accordance with another possible embodiment, an audio speaker includes first and second drivers supported by an enclosure, the first and second drivers radiating outside of the enclosure and a sonic inducer supported by the enclosure between the coupling and loading chambers.
In another possible embodiment, the sonic inducer includes at least one of a third driver, a drone cone, and a port.
In yet another possible embodiment, the sonic inducer is an undriven third driver having first and second terminals, and further including a passive electrical load electrically connected across the first and second terminals of the undriven third driver.
In still another possible embodiment, the audio speaker includes a second sonic inducer supported by the enclosure between the loading chamber and ambient.
In another possible embodiment, the second sonic inducer includes at least one of a drone cone and a port.
In yet one other possible embodiment, the sonic inducer is an undriven third driver.
In the following description, there are shown and described several embodiments of audio speakers. As it should be realized, the audio speakers are capable of other, different embodiments and their several details are capable of modification in various, obvious aspects all without departing from the audio speakers as set forth and described in the following claims. Accordingly, the drawings and descriptions should be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated herein and forming a part of the specification, illustrate several aspects of the audio speakers and together with the description serve to explain certain principles thereof. In the drawing figures:
Reference will now be made in detail to the present embodiments of the audio speakers, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawing figures, wherein like numerals are used to represent like elements.
Reference is now made to
As shown, the enclosure 36 includes a loading portion 38 that defines a loading chamber 40 and a coupling portion 42 that defines a coupling chamber 44. The size and shape of the loading and coupling portions 38 and 42 and the defined loading and coupling chambers 40 and 44 may vary in size and/or shape based on design preference, desired output parameters, etc. In the described embodiment, the four radiating drivers 32 are supported by the enclosure 36 generally within the coupling chamber 44 such that the drivers radiate away from the enclosure into a listening space such as a room, stadium, venue, etc. In other words, the radiating drivers 32 create sound waves into the listening space. Similarly, the loading driver 34 is supported by the enclosure generally within the coupling chamber 44 but the driver communicates with the loading chamber 40 and the coupling chamber 44. In this arrangement, the radiating drivers 32 are loaded by the loading driver 34, and the loading driver is loaded by the loading chamber 40.
Turning to the embodiment shown in
As shown in
Of course, a loading driver may be positioned at nearly any location within an enclosure so long as the loading driver is able to load the at least two radiating drivers. In one other embodiment shown in
The four key components of the above-described embodiments shown in
In the described embodiments, the radiating drivers were chosen for their characteristics to produce sound at a desired level and quality over a desired frequency range. The loading drivers were selected to compliment the radiating drivers so that the loading chamber could be minimized and so that the radiating drivers would couple with the loading drivers in the coupling chamber. For illustration purposes, consider the radiating drivers in Table 2 and add a single loading driver to create Table 4 shown below. This configuration with these values was used in a test prototype which unexpectedly produced very satisfactory sound quality over a wide range of frequencies.
TABLE 4
Sd
Fs
Mms
Qts
Area of
Resonant
Air Mass
Resonant
Prototype Drivers
Cone
Frequency
Equivalent
Peak
(4) 10″ Radiating
358 cm
37.7 Hz
53 g
0.26
(1) 15″ Loading
881 cm
47 Hz
106 g
0.47
In order to use equations 1 and 2, set forth above, to determine a required loading chamber volume, Vb, guidance can be taken from the isobaric one-to-one methodology by combining the Mms for all 5 individual drivers to determine a composite Mms. This seems a reasonable place to start and free-air testing of the speaker system with added mass to the cones validates the method of adding the Mms of all drivers even when the loading driver is not identical to the radiating driver. Free-air testing of a single driver is well understood and involves stimulating the driver electrically without a loading chamber (hence free-air) and measuring the current response. A similar approach was adopted for free-air testing the described driver arrays whereby there was a coupling chamber between the radiating drivers and the loading driver(s), but there was not a loading chamber.
A second parameter to obtain for the described embodiment's illustrative driver array is the system Qts which is, fortunately, provided by the free-air test.
The third parameter to obtain for the described embodiment's illustrative driver array is the system Sd. This parameter is more troubling to obtain for the system since the total Sd for the radiating drivers is 4*358 cm=1,432 cm, which is considerably larger than the loading driver Sd of 881 cm. The one-to-one isobaric literature does not provide direction on what is the effective Sd of the system when the loading driver(s) is of different quantity and size relative to the radiating driver(s). Since the loading chamber interfaces directly with the loading driver(s) and not the radiating drivers, a reasonable place to start is to assume that the system Sd is the same as the loading driver Sd.
With the above assumptions the system parameters are estimated and shown in Table 5 below.
TABLE 5
Sd
Fs
Mms
Area of
Resonant
Air Mass
Qts
Prototype Drivers
Cone
Frequency
Equivalent
Resonant Peak
(4) 10″ Radiating
358 cm
37.7 Hz
53 g
0.26
(1) 15″ Loading
881 cm
47 Hz
106 g
0.47
System
881 cm
41 Hz
318 g
0.36
With this information, the anticipated loading chamber size, Vb, for the system can be calculated from equations 1 and 2, assuming that the equations are valid for the system with the loading driver(s) not identical to the radiating drivers:
Vas=k*Sd2/(Mms*Fs2)=36*8812/(318*412)=52.3 liters (2)
Vb=Vas/((Qtc/Qts)2−1)=52.3/((0.651.36)2−1)=23.1 liters (1)
While a loading chamber size, Vb, of 23.1 liters in the test prototype represents a significant reduction and would be very satisfactory, actual testing of the prototype audio loudspeaker system revealed that a Vb of 5 liters is needed to yield an Qtc of 0.65. Five liters is essentially the air volume inside a concave shape of the loading driver cone, as the actual back wall of the loading chamber was flush with the driver after allowing for cone travel. In other words, it was impractical to make Vb smaller and the Vb volume did not take up any additional space outside the driver's cone. The actual Vb was an unanticipated ⅕ the volume of the anticipated Vb with the assumed parameter values from Table 5. As noted above, the volume of the loading driver refers herein to an air volume inside a concave shape of the loading driver cone/diaphragm.
It is interesting to note that the commonly practiced equations used to calculate loading chamber volume appear inadequate for a speaker system when the loading driver is not identical to the radiating driver. Most importantly, the result is a pleasantly surprising one—whereby the actual required loading chamber volume is very small. This result makes for a compelling case to reduce the loading chamber for an array of radiating drivers by adding a single loading driver. It should also be noted that multiple loading drivers of a smaller diameter could be deployed instead of the larger single. For example, two 12″ drivers could have been used as the loading drivers in the described embodiments. But, one 15″ driver will usually be less expensive than two 12″ drivers, so a single loading driver will usually be chosen. The embodiments described herein were used as the subwoofer in several beta test live performances and the consistent feedback from listeners was that the bass sounded awesome. Interestingly, most listeners did not recognize the described embodiment as being the subwoofer since it was so small it did not fit into their paradigm of what a bass loudspeaker looked like.
A summary of the loading chamber volume for the various cases considered for implementing a four 10″ radiating driver array with a Qtc of 0.65 for bass frequencies is shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6
Radiating
Loading
Configuration
Drivers
Qtc
Drivers
FIG.
Vb (liters)
Conventional
4 × 10″
0.65
None
1
40.8
Isobaric
4 × 10″
0.65
4 × 10″
3
20.6
One Embodiment
4 × 10″
0.65
1 × 15″
5
5.0
A topic of relevance to the discussion of loading drivers not being identical to radiating drivers includes the conditions under which they couple. In this instance, coupling means that the drivers communicate with each other in such a way as to obtain a desired operating regime. The loudspeaker industry's conventional thought on the requirements for an isobaric pair of drivers coupling each other is that each driver in the pair is identical and are electrically manipulated from the amplifier so that they move forward and backward in unison, or are in common acoustic operation. Such a condition produces the assumed constant pressure in the coupling chamber and therefore facilitates coupling. Without coupling, the drivers would be acting independent of each other, or at least not having the desired effect on each other. The embodiments disclosed herein do not assume that the pressure is constant in the coupling chamber as does isobaric. Further, the embodiments disclosed herein assert that the loading driver can be different from the radiating drivers in size; however, for optimum results, coupling must occur between the loading driver(s) and the radiating drivers in order for the space reducing properties desired to be maximized while maintaining good sound quality.
Toward the objective of having a guideline for designing a coupled system where the loading driver(s) is different in size and quantity from the radiating drivers, the following is offered. Assuming the loading driver(s) is electrically manipulated at the same magnitude and in appropriate phase relative to the radiating drivers, then the loading driver(s) should have higher sensitivity than the radiating drivers. The parameter sensitivity is a measure of SPL produced for a given electrical input with the units of dB. So, a driver with a certain Sd and a higher sensitivity will displace more air volume than a driver of the same Sd but with lower sensitivity, assuming both are manipulated by the same electrical input.
The inventor has seen good results over a range of loading driver sensitivity relative to that of the radiating drivers in actual testing. Sizes available for both radiating and loading drivers are in steps such as 2″, 3″, 4″, 6″, 8″, 10″, 12″ 15″, 18″, and 21″ diameters. Therefore, a desired ratio of Sb radiating to Sb loading is not always possible to obtain precisely because a size needed to create the desired ratio may not exist. In general, an acceptable design (good sound quality with minimum size) may be reached with fewer design-build-test iterations by following this process assuming multiple radiating drivers with fewer loading drivers than radiating drivers: (1) determine a type and quantity of radiating drivers to accomplish sound reproduction objectives; (2) select or utilize a loading driver Sd equal to or larger than any single radiating driver; (3) select or utilize a loading driver(s) Sd (combined) equal to or smaller than all radiating drivers combined; (4) select or utilize a loading driver having an equal to or higher sensitivity than a radiating driver; (5) minimize the volume of the coupling chamber by geometric arrangement of the drivers; and (6) minimize the volume of the loading chamber. In using these steps, a first prototype should be configured with an aggressively small loading chamber that can be increased in size if necessary on subsequent prototype(s).
The parameters for steps (1) through (3) above are shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7
Radiating Drivers
Loading Drivers
Sd
Sensi-
Sd
Sensi-
Qty × Dia
each
Sd total
tivity
Qty × Dia
each
Sd
tivity
4 × 10″
358
1432
91.6
1 × 15″
881
881
96.0
It should be acknowledged that the mathematical modeling of speaker systems often is many years behind the practical implementation of an improvement. This will likely prove to be true for the disclosed invention in regards to both a) selecting loading and radiating drivers that will couple, and b) defining the mathematical equations that provide the required loading chamber volume for the selected drivers.
Many prototypes have been built and tested wherein the acoustic speaker includes m radiating drivers and at least one but less than m−1 loading driver(s) with satisfactory results. Examples are included in the following list, but the invention is in no way limited to these additional examples: (1) two radiating drivers with one loading driver; (2) three radiating drivers with one loading driver; (4) four radiating drivers with one loading driver, where the radiating drivers are arranged in one or two columns; (5) eight radiating drivers with one loading driver, where the radiating drivers are arranged in a single or multiple columns; (6) eight radiating drivers with two loading drivers, where the radiating drivers are arranged in a single or multiple columns; (7) bass frequency range only; and (8) full frequency range. For each example configuration listed above, many were successfully implemented with the loading driver being identical in size with the radiating drivers. However, superior results were generally obtained when the loading driver was larger in diameter than any one radiating driver and had a higher sensitivity.
Which configuration is chosen by the designer depends on certain preferences such as industrial design and considerations like minimizing the volumes of the coupling and loading chambers. The disclosed techniques provide for a very small loading chamber, and the coupling chamber is naturally more effective the smaller it is. So, the loudspeaker designer may choose how to configure the drivers so that overall loudspeaker size is minimized by minimizing distances between drivers in the direction(s) which are important in the application.
The foregoing has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. For example, the described embodiments utilize one or more loading drivers but at least one less than a number of radiating drivers. In other embodiments, however, other sound pressure creation inducers, may be utilized. For example, the at least two radiating drivers may be combined with one or more sonic inducers such as an electroacoustic transducer (e.g., a loading driver) and a resonant exciter (e.g., an unpowered or undriven loading driver, a port, or a drone cone) as further described below.
As shown in
Even more, each of the embodiments shown in
In even more embodiments, shown in
As shown in
In another embodiment shown in
As shown in
In another embodiment shown in
All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3927261, | |||
4224469, | Jan 02 1979 | Stereo speaker system | |
5147986, | Dec 03 1990 | Tandy Corporation | Subwoofer speaker system |
6886658, | May 23 2000 | Loudspeaker enclosure system | |
7046816, | Sep 14 2001 | Coincident source stereo speaker | |
20020051552, | |||
20050111673, | |||
20060078144, | |||
WO2017124068, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 01 2019 | STRUNK, DAVID T | Endow Audio, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 049938 | /0573 | |
Aug 02 2019 | Endow Audio, LLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 02 2019 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Aug 14 2019 | SMAL: Entity status set to Small. |
Jun 03 2024 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 22 2023 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 22 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 22 2024 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 22 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 22 2027 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 22 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 22 2028 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 22 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 22 2031 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 22 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 22 2032 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 22 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |