A power distribution monitoring system is provided that can include a number of features. The system can include a plurality of monitoring devices configured to attach to individual conductors on a power grid distribution network. In some embodiments, a monitoring device includes a current sensing element comprising a rogowski coil. The output of the rogowski coil can be used by a fault detection circuit to determine if a fault or disturbance occurs on the conductor. Methods of using the monitoring devices are also provided.

Patent
   11041915
Priority
Sep 18 2018
Filed
Sep 18 2019
Issued
Jun 22 2021
Expiry
Dec 24 2039
Extension
97 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
3
180
EXPIRING-grace
1. A method of sensing a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network, comprising:
inducing a voltage in a rogowski coil of a line monitoring device to produce a raw output;
inputting the raw output from the rogowski coil into an integrator circuit of the line monitoring device to produce an integrated output;
inputting the raw output from the rogowski coil into an all-pass filter of the line monitoring device to produce a filtered output;
subtracting the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output; and
indicating that a fault or disturbance has occurred on the conductor if the fault detection output is a non-zero value.
16. A fault detection system, comprising:
a conductor of a power distribution network;
a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor;
a rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein the conductor is configured to induce a voltage in the rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor; and
a fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises:
an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the rogowski coil and produce an integrated output;
an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the rogowski coil and produce a filtered output;
a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output;
wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.
9. A line monitoring device configured to detect a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network, comprising:
a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor;
a rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein a voltage is induced in the rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor; and
a fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises:
an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the rogowski coil and produce an integrated output;
an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the rogowski coil and produce a filtered output;
a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output;
wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to the inducing step, mounting the line monitoring device on the conductor.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the raw output of the rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the subtracting step is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the fundamental frequency is 60 Hz.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the fundamental frequency is 50 Hz.
10. The device of claim 9, wherein the raw output of the rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.
11. The device of claim 9, wherein a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest.
12. The device of claim 11, wherein a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.
13. The device of claim 9, wherein subtracting is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor.
14. The device of claim 13, wherein the fundamental frequency is 60 Hz.
15. The device of claim 13, wherein the fundamental frequency is 50 Hz.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/732,789, filed Sep. 18, 2018, titled “Disturbance Detecting Current Sensor”, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

The present application relates generally to distribution line monitoring, sensor monitoring, and power harvesting.

The current flow in power distribution network conductors includes the desirable fundamental power frequency of 50/60 Hz (depending on the country), and numerous types of undesirable frequencies. Broadly speaking, some of these frequencies are multiples of the fundamental frequency and are known as harmonics, while other frequencies may be more random and could be indications of various problems such as arcing, voltage breakdowns, or animal/vegetation contact. These later group of frequencies could collectively be called disturbances.

Electric utility companies attempt to sense and monitor disturbances in order to identify problems on their network. As stated above, one primary attribute of disturbance frequencies is that they are not the predominant fundamental power frequency. It is common in the industry to monitor electric conductors with current sensors. In the large majority of the cases, the foremost interest is to measure the amplitude of the fundamental frequency as a measure of the bulk current being delivered. In other cases however, the output of a current sensor may be post-processed in order to separate the any disturbance signals from the fundamental signals. Because the current sensor has just one output, and the post-processor has one input, the types of post-processing is limited.

While some fully featured monitoring devices can be configured to monitor, among other things, current flow in the power line and current waveforms, conductor temperatures, ambient temperatures, vibration, wind speed, monitoring device system diagnostics, etc., these fully featured monitoring devices can be expensive and can be overkill for situations when only a bare-bones, low-power fault detection device is required.

This disclosure generally provides distribution line monitoring sensors that include a number of features. Particularly, described herein are distribution line monitoring sensors with Rogowski coil current sensing elements connected to an integrator circuit, which allows disturbances on the conductor to be clearly indicated on the output waveform.

A method of sensing a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network is provided, comprising inducing a voltage in a Rogowski coil of a line monitoring device to produce a raw output, inputting the raw output from the Rogowski coil into an integrator circuit of the line monitoring device to produce an integrated output, inputting the raw output from the Rogowski coil into an all-pass filter of the line monitoring device to produce a filtered output, subtracting the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output, and indicating that a fault or disturbance has occurred on the conductor if the fault detection output is a non-zero value.

In some examples, the method further comprises, prior to the inducing step, mounting the line monitoring device on the conductor.

In some embodiments, the raw output of the Rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.

In one embodiment, a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest. In another embodiment, a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.

In some embodiments, the subtracting step is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor. The fundamental frequency can be, for example, 60 Hz, 50 Hz.

A line monitoring device configured to detect a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network is also provided, comprising a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor, a Rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein a voltage is induced in the Rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor, a fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the Rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce an integrated output, an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce a filtered output, a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output, wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.

In some embodiments, the raw output of the Rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.

In one embodiment, a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest. In another embodiment, a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.

In some embodiments, the subtracting step is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor. The fundamental frequency can be, for example, 60 Hz, 50 Hz.

A fault detection system is further provided, comprising a conductor of a power distribution network, a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor, a Rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein the conductor is configured to induce a voltage in the Rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor, a fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the Rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce an integrated output, an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce a filtered output, a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output, wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1A is a typical over-head three-phase power distribution system utilizing a cross-bar mounted on pole for mechanical positioning of the conductors. Alternate patterns of parallel conductor routing are sometimes used. Power distribution line monitoring devices (102,104,106) are attached to the power lines typically using a standard lineman's shotgun hotstick (106) for easy deployment with necessitating turning off power in the lines.

FIGS. 1B and 1C show a schematic representation of a monitoring sensor in the closed (1B) and open (1C) positions. The open position facilitates mounting the monitoring sensor on a power line. The sensor remains on the power line in the closed (1B) position.

FIG. 2A is a schematic drawing of a monitoring device configured to detect disturbances or faults on a conductor of a power grid distribution network.

FIG. 2B is a schematic drawing of the components of a monitoring device including a Rogowski coil and a fault detection circuit.

FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate the frequency responses of both the integrator and the all-pass filter of the circuit of FIG. 2B.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart describing a method for detecting a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network.

Power line monitoring devices and systems described herein are configured to measure the currents of power grid distribution networks. Referring to FIG. 1A, monitoring system 100 comprises monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 mounted to power lines or primary conductors 108, 110, and 112, respectively, of power distribution network 114. The power distribution network can be a three phase AC network, or alternatively, a single-phase network, for example. The power distribution network can be any type of network, such as a 60 Hz North American network, or alternatively, a 50 Hz network such as is found in Europe and Asia, for example. Power distribution networks, such as in the United States, typically operate at a medium voltage (e.g., 4 kV to 65 kV or higher) to reduce the energy lost during transmission over long distances. The monitoring devices can also be used on high voltage “transmission lines” that operate at voltages higher than 65 kV.

Monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 can be mounted on each power line of a three-phase network, as shown. The monitoring devices can be mounted quickly and easily via a hot-stick 116, and can harvest energy from the power lines for operation without additional supplemental power (e.g., batteries or solar panels). Installation of a three monitoring device array can be placed and configured by a single linesman with a hot-stick and a bucket truck in less than 20 minutes.

FIG. 1B illustrates a monitoring device in a closed/clamped configuration, and FIG. 1C shows the monitoring device in an opened/installation configuration. It should be understood that the device is opened into the installation configuration during installation on power lines, then closed around the line in the clamped configuration prior to operation.

The monitoring devices of the present disclosure, at a fundamental level, include only the components required to detect faults or disturbances on the power distribution network via current measurement, and include power harvesting components that enable the monitoring devices to harvest enough energy from the conductors for operation. Thus, the monitoring devices of the present disclosure are well suited for applications in which only line fault detection and self-powered operation are required, therefore providing low-power, efficient, and inexpensive line monitoring devices for power distribution networks.

FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of a monitoring device 202 mounted on a primary conductor 208, illustrating the main schematic components of the device. The monitoring device 202 can include a current sensing element 203 configured to sense a current of the primary conductor 208, a power harvesting element 205 configured to harvest power from primary conductor 208, and a fault detection circuit 207 that is electrically connected to the current sensing element. The current sensing element can be, for example, a Rogowski coil mounted around the primary conductor 208 to induce a voltage in the Rogowski coil that is proportional to the rate of change of current in the conductor. The Rogowski coil produces an output 209 that is not directly proportional to the current level of the current in the primary conductor, but rather is proportional to the slew rate of the current in the primary conductor (dI/dT). This output 209 is the “raw” output from the Rogowski coil. The output 209 of the Rogowski coil is input into the fault detection circuit 208, which provides a fault indication output 211 that can be used to determine if there is a fault or disturbance on the primary conductor 208.

FIG. 2B is another schematic diagram showing the current sensing element, or Rogowski coil 203, connected to the fault detection circuit 207. As shown, in this embodiment the fault detection circuit can comprise comprises an integrator 213 and an all pass filter 215 in a parallel configuration. The fault detection circuit 207 can be positioned inside the monitoring device, as shown in FIG. 2A, or alternatively, can be externally mounted but still electrically connected to the Rogowski coil. As described above, the output 209 from the Rogowski coil is a raw output that is proportional to the slew rate of the current in the primary conductor (dI/dT). This output 209 can be presented to the fault detection circuit which comprises an integrator 213 and an all-pass filter 215 in parallel. The fault detection circuit of the present disclosure utilizes two signals to produce the fault indication output 211; the first signal is the integrator output 217, representing the true current signal on the conductor as measured by the Rogowski coil, and the other signal is the pre-integrated or raw signal, directly from the Rogowski coil, which is passed through the all-pass filter to provide a filtered output 219. The two signal paths are processed separately, and then summed (e.g., subtracted, or summed with one of the inputs made negative) with a summation circuit 221 to create one final fault detection output 211, as shown in FIG. 2B. Any techniques or circuits for summing (subtracting) the outputs of the integrator circuit and the all-pass filter can be used, as known in the art.

The integrator path in the fault detection circuit 207 can have an ideal 90° phase shift over the frequency band of interest, and a sloping frequency response of approximately −20 dB per decade where the point of intercept of the fundamental frequency defines the gain (or attenuation) at the fundamental power frequency. The all-pass filter is configured to pass all frequencies equally in gain but change the phase relationship of the signal among various frequencies. The all-pass filter signal path of FIG. 2B can have complementary attributes to the integrator path, namely, a sloping phase shift response, where 90° of shift intercepts the fundamental power frequency, and a constant frequency response where the gain (or attenuation) is constant over the frequency band of interest.

FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate the frequency responses of both the integrator and the all-pass filter, respectively, of the circuit of FIG. 2B. It is noteworthy that although the two signal paths have altogether different characteristics, a pure sine wave, at the fundamental frequency (such as at 60 Hz for a power distribution network) the two signal paths have identical outputs. In the example above, they each have 10 dB of gain and a 90° phase shift at the fundamental frequency. Subtracting these two signals results in a null or zero output, again at the fundamental frequency. Thus, the fault detection circuit can be configured to indicate or detect disturbances or faults on the primary conductor when the output of the fault detection circuit is non-zero, as this output waveform that represents the amplitude and phase differences between the disturbance and the fundamental frequency.

In a traditionally used Rogowski coil, the “raw” output of the sensor coil is not accessible in many cases, it is only an internal connection and of no value. The novelty of the present disclosure is that the fault detection circuit is able to “reach inside” the Rogowski coil and connect a different type of filter to the raw Rogowski coil. Then by subtracting these two outputs, the resulting signal shows only the signals that are non-fundamental. These two filters respond to gain and phase in differing manners. But the circuit can be configured such that their outputs look identical at the fundamental frequency (e.g., 60 Hz). So with a pure 60 Hz current wave, the outputs from the integrator and all-pass filter subtract to zero. All other frequencies (e.g., disturbances) will have mis-matched outputs between the two filters, and therefore are exposed in the combined output. Thus, the output of the fault detection circuit in the present disclosure can be used to detect disturbances or faults in the primary conductor. When the output of the fault detection circuit is zero at the fundamental frequency, then there is not a fault or disturbance present on the primary conductor. However, if the output of the fault detection circuit is non-zero, then it can be an indication that a fault or disturbance is present on the primary conductor.

In some embodiments, this circuit can be implemented in ultra low-power analog circuitry. Because this circuit's output, in the absence of a disturbance, normally rests at a near zero level, the output can be monitored, for example, with a voltage comparator, and a trip threshold can be created in the monitoring device to indicate a disturbance is occurring.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart that describes a method for detecting a disturbance or fault on a conductor line of a power distribution network. At an operation 402 of the flowchart, a voltage can be induced in a Rogowski coil of a line monitoring device. As described above, the line monitoring device, and Rogowski coil, can be mounted to a conductor of a power distribution system. The voltage induced in the Rogowski coil can produce a raw output that is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.

At an operation 404 of the flowchart, the raw output from the Rogowski coil can be input into an integrator circuit of the line monitoring device to produce an integrated output. This integrated output represents the true current signal on the conductor as measured by the Rogowski coil. Next, at an operation 406 of the flowchart, the raw output from the Rogowski coil can also be input into an all-pass filter of the line monitoring device to produce a filtered output. The all-pass filter of operation 406 is designed and configured to have complementary attributes to the integrated output, namely a sloping phase shift response and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.

At an operation 408 of the flowchart, the integrated output of the integrator circuit can be summed/subtracted from the filtered output of the all-pass filter. As described above, the all-pass filter is designed to be complimentary to the integrator, such that at the fundamental frequency (or operating frequency of the conductor) the sum of the integrated output and the filtered output will be zero during normal operating conditions. Again, referring to FIGS. 3A and 3B, the frequency response of the integrator has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over the frequency band of interest. The all-pass filter, however, has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at the fundamental frequency, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest. At the fundamental frequency, the gain and phase shift of the two outputs are identical in normal operating conditions. Thus, subtracting these two outputs results in a zero output at the fundamental frequency during normal operating conditions. However, during fault or disturbance conditions, the two outputs sum out to a non-zero value. Thus, at operation 410, a non-zero fault detection output is indicative of a fault or disturbance on the conductor. This fault detection output can be transmitted or communicated from the line monitoring device in the event of a fault or disturbance (e.g., communicated wirelessly or by wire).

As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.

Rumrill, Ronald S.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
11549997, Dec 13 2018 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Multi-phase simulation environment
11835593, Dec 13 2018 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Multi-phase simulation environment
11977108, Nov 06 2019 Robert Bosch GmbH Monitoring set-up to detect supply-line faults for a control unit
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3075166,
3558984,
3676740,
3686531,
3702966,
3708724,
3715742,
3720872,
3725832,
3755714,
3768011,
3777217,
3814831,
3816816,
3866197,
3876911,
3957329, Nov 01 1974 BROWN BOVERI ELECTRIC INC A CORP OF DE Fault-current limiter for high power electrical transmission systems
3970898, Nov 23 1973 Zellweger Uster AG Method of automatically isolating a faulty section of a power line belonging to an electrical energy supply network, and arrangement for carrying out this method
4063161, Apr 14 1975 Joslyn Corporation Buried cable fault locator with earth potential indicator and pulse generator
4152643, Apr 10 1978 E. O. Schweitzer Manufacturing Co., Inc. Voltage indicating test point cap
4339792, Apr 12 1979 Voltage regulator using saturable transformer
4378525, Sep 18 1980 Method and apparatus for measuring a DC current in a wire without making a direct connection to the wire
4396794, Mar 30 1981 ASEA BROWN BOVERI, INC Arc protection clamp and arrangement for covered overhead power distribution lines
4396968, Sep 22 1982 ASEA BROWN BOVERI, INC Fused distribution power system with clamp device for preventing arc damage to insulated distribution conductors
4398057, Mar 30 1981 ASEA BROWN BOVERI, INC Arc protection arrangement for covered overhead power distribution lines
4408155, Mar 02 1981 Bridges Electric, Inc. Fault detector with improved response time for electrical transmission system
4466071, Sep 28 1981 Texas A&M University System High impedance fault detection apparatus and method
4559491, Sep 14 1982 ASEA Aktiebolag Method and device for locating a fault point on a three-phase power transmission line
4570231, Jan 27 1984 Richard H., Bunch Fault finder
4584523, Oct 03 1983 RCA Corporation Measurement of the current flow in an electric power transmission line by detection of infrared radiation therefrom
4649457, Feb 17 1984 B. H. Tytewadd Marketing, Incorporated Surge protection device
4654573, May 17 1985 KLEINER, PERKINS, CAUFIELD & BYERS III; AENEAS VENTURE CORPORATION; Security Pacific Capital Corporation Power transfer device
4709339, Apr 13 1983 Electrical power line parameter measurement apparatus and systems, including compact, line-mounted modules
4714893, Apr 13 1983 UNDERSGROUND SYSTEMS, INC Apparatus for measuring the potential of a transmission line conductor
4723220, Apr 13 1983 UNDERSGROUND SYSTEMS, INC Apparatus for power measuring and calculating Fourier components of power line parameters
4728887, Jun 22 1984 System for rating electric power transmission lines and equipment
4746241, Apr 13 1983 UNDERSGROUND SYSTEMS, INC Hinge clamp for securing a sensor module on a power transmission line
4766549, Nov 30 1984 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc; Washington State University Research Foundation Single-ended transmission line fault locator
4775839, May 21 1985 Korona Messtechnik Gossau Control apparatus for the electronic detection in a.c. power transmission lines of fault locations causing power losses
4808916, Nov 14 1986 UNDERSGROUND SYSTEMS, INC Power supply magnetic shunt for transmission line sensor module
4829298, Apr 13 1983 Electrical power line monitoring systems, including harmonic value measurements and relaying communications
4881028, Jun 13 1988 Fault detector
4886980, Nov 05 1985 UNDERSGROUND SYSTEMS, INC Transmission line sensor apparatus operable with near zero current line conditions
4904932, Jun 16 1987 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Circuit condition monitor with integrally molded test point socket and capacitive coupling
4937769, Jun 15 1988 ABB POWER T&D COMPANY, INC , A DE CORP Apparatus and method for reducing transient exponential noise in a sinusoidal signal
5006846, Nov 12 1987 Power transmission line monitoring system
5125738, Dec 13 1988 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Apparatus and system for locating a point or a faulty point in a transmission line
5138265, Nov 30 1988 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD Apparatus and system for locating thunderstruck point and faulty point of transmission line
5159561, Apr 05 1989 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha; Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated Zero-phase sequence current detector
5181026, Jan 12 1990 GRANVILLE GROUP, INC , THE A CORP OF CALIFORNIA Power transmission line monitoring system
5182547, Jan 16 1991 HIGH VOLTAGE MAINTENANCE, 5100 ENERGY DRIVE, P O BOX 14059, DAYTON, OHIO 45414-0059 A CORP OF OHIO Neutral wire current monitoring for three-phase four-wire power distribution system
5202812, Sep 21 1988 NGK Insulators, Ltd. Apparatus for detecting faults on power transmission lines
5206595, Sep 10 1991 Electric Power Research Institute Advanced cable fault location
5220311, Feb 19 1991 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Direction indicating fault indicators
5428549, May 28 1993 ABB POWER T&D COMPANY, INC Transmission line fault location system
5438256, Jul 06 1992 GEC Alsthom T&D SA Apparatus and method for measurement from the ground for high voltage overhead lines
5473244, Sep 17 1992 Apparatus for measuring voltages and currents using non-contacting sensors
5495169, Oct 12 1984 Clamp-on current sensor
5550476, Sep 29 1994 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Fault sensor device with radio transceiver
5565783, Sep 29 1994 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Fault sensor device with radio transceiver
5600248, Jun 21 1995 DIPL -ING H HORSTMANN GMBH Fault distance locator for underground cable circuits
5608328, Nov 18 1994 Radar Engineers Method and apparatus for pin-pointing faults in electric power lines
5650728, Apr 03 1995 Curators of the University of Missouri Fault detection system including a capacitor for generating a pulse and a processor for determining admittance versus frequency of a reflected pulse
5656931, Jan 20 1995 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Fault current sensor device with radio transceiver
5682100, Sep 06 1995 Electric Power Research Institute Inc. System and method for locating faults in electric power cables
5696788, Dec 26 1995 Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute; Korea Telecommunications Authority Circuit for searching fault location in a device having a plurality of application specific integrated circuits
5712796, Jul 14 1994 Hitachi Cable, LTD Method for evaluating the faulted sections and states in a power transmission line
5729144, Dec 02 1996 SANKOSHA U S A , INC Systems and methods for determining location of a fault on an electric utility power distribution system
5737203, Oct 03 1994 Delphi Technologies Inc Controlled-K resonating transformer
5764065, Sep 20 1996 JDR ENGINEERING, INC Remote contamination sensing device for determining contamination on insulation of power lines and substations
5839093, Dec 31 1996 ABB Transmit Oy System for locating faults and estimating fault resistance in distribution networks with tapped loads
5892430, Apr 25 1994 Foster-Miller, Inc. Self-powered powerline sensor
5905646, Dec 20 1996 Scandinova Systems AB Power modulator
5990674, Jul 08 1996 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Clamping mechanism for mounting circuit condition monitoring devices on cables of various diameters
6002260, Sep 23 1997 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Fault sensor suitable for use in heterogenous power distribution systems
6016105, Apr 30 1998 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Fault indicator providing contact closure and light indication on fault detection
6043433, Feb 20 1998 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Cable clamp with universal positioning
6133723, Jun 29 1998 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Fault indicator having remote light indication of fault detection
6133724, Jun 29 1998 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Remote light indication fault indicator with a timed reset circuit and a manual reset circuit
6288632, Dec 20 1999 General Electric Company Apparatus and method for power line communication (PLC)
6292340, Apr 09 1999 Electrical Materials Company Apparatus for isolation of high impedance faults
6347027, Nov 26 1997 S&C ELECTRIC CO Method and apparatus for automated reconfiguration of an electric power distribution system with enhanced protection
6433698, Apr 30 1998 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Fault indicator providing light indication on fault detection
6459998, Jul 24 1999 Sensing downed power lines
6466030, Dec 29 2000 ABB POWER GRIDS SWITZERLAND AG Systems and methods for locating faults on a transmission line with a single tapped load
6466031, Dec 29 2000 ABB POWER GRIDS SWITZERLAND AG Systems and methods for locating faults on a transmission line with multiple tapped loads
6477475, Nov 12 1998 NIPPON KOUATSU ELECTRIC CO , LTD ; TAKAOKA, MOTOKUNI Fault point location system
6483435, Jul 11 2000 ABB POWER GRIDS SWITZERLAND AG Method and device of fault location for distribution networks
6549880, Sep 15 1999 McGraw Edison Company Reliability of electrical distribution networks
6559651, Oct 25 2000 FOCUS STRATEGIES CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC Method for locating an open in a conductive line of an insulated conductor
6566854, Mar 13 1998 FLORIDA INTERNATONAL UNIVERSITY FOR AND ON THE BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Apparatus for measuring high frequency currents
6577108, Nov 24 1999 American Superconductor Corporation Voltage regulation of a utility power network
6601001, Jan 13 1999 AREVA T&D UK LTD Fault-detection for power lines
6622285, Nov 02 2000 HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P Methods and systems for fault location
6677743, Mar 05 1999 Foster-Miller, Inc High voltage powerline sensor with a plurality of voltage sensing devices
6718271, Aug 31 1998 Electricity Supply Board Fault detection apparatus and method of detecting faults in an electrical distribution network
6734662, Oct 26 2001 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Microprocessor controlled fault indicator having led fault indication circuit with battery conservation mode
6798211, Oct 30 1997 Remote Monitoring Systems, Inc. Power line fault detector and analyzer
6822457, Mar 27 2003 SPRINGBOK INC Method of precisely determining the location of a fault on an electrical transmission system
6822576, Oct 26 2001 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Microprocessor controlled fault detector with circuit overload condition detection
6879917, Jun 14 2002 PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS INC Double-ended distance-to-fault location system using time-synchronized positive-or negative-sequence quantities
6894478, Oct 26 2001 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Fault indicator with automatically configured trip settings
6914763, Jan 15 2002 Wellspring Heritage, LLC Utility control and autonomous disconnection of distributed generation from a power distribution system
6917888, May 06 2002 Arkados, Inc Method and system for power line network fault detection and quality monitoring
6927672, Jun 12 2001 Main.net Communications Ltd. Information transmission over power lines
6949921, Oct 26 2001 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Auto-calibration of multiple trip settings in a fault indicator
6963197, May 31 2002 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Targeted timed reset fault indicator
6980090, Dec 10 2002 Current Technologies, LLC Device and method for coupling with electrical distribution network infrastructure to provide communications
7023691, Oct 26 2001 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Fault Indicator with permanent and temporary fault indication
7046124, Jan 21 2003 Current Technologies, LLC; REVEAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Power line coupling device and method of using the same
7053601, Oct 26 2001 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Microprocessor controlled fault indicator having high visibility LED fault indication
7072163, Oct 19 2004 Marmon Utility LLC Method and apparatus for a remote electric power line conductor faulted circuit current monitoring system
7076378, Nov 13 2002 Current Technologies, LLC Device and method for providing power line characteristics and diagnostics
7085659, Oct 15 2004 ABB Schweiz AG Dynamic energy threshold calculation for high impedance fault detection
7106048, Oct 26 2001 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Fault indicator with auto-configuration for overhead or underground application
7158012, Nov 01 1996 Foster-Miller, Inc. Non-invasive powerline communications system
7187275, Oct 21 2004 Marmon Utility LLC Method and apparatus for a remote electric power line conductor faulted circuit current, conductor temperature, conductor potential and conductor strain monitoring and alarm system
7203622, Dec 23 2002 ABB Schweiz AG Value-based transmission asset maintenance management of electric power networks
7272516, Dec 23 2002 HITACHI ENERGY LTD Failure rate adjustment for electric power network reliability analysis
7295133, Dec 30 2004 Hendrix Wire & Cable, Inc. Electrical circuit monitoring device
7400150, Aug 05 2004 CANNON TECHNOLOGIES, INC Remote fault monitoring in power lines
7424400, Jun 04 2004 FMC Tech Limited Method of monitoring line faults in a medium voltage network
7449991, Dec 10 2002 Current Technologies, LLC Power line communications device and method
7450000, Oct 26 2004 Current Technologies, LLC Power line communications device and method
7508638, Feb 28 2006 SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC Devices, systems, and methods for providing electrical power
7518529, Jan 31 2003 FMC Tech Limited Monitoring device for a medium voltage overhead line
7532012, Jul 07 2006 Ericsson Inc Detection and monitoring of partial discharge of a power line
7557563, Jan 19 2005 POWER MEASUREMENT LTD Current sensor assembly
7626794, Oct 18 2005 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Systems, methods, and apparatus for indicating faults within a power circuit utilizing dynamically modified inrush restraint
7633262, Mar 11 2005 Lindsey Manufacturing Company Power supply for underground and pad mounted power distribution systems
7672812, Nov 01 2006 HITACHI ENERGY LTD Cable fault detection
7683798, Jul 07 2006 SSI Power, LLC Current monitoring device for high voltage electric power lines
7701356, Mar 16 2006 POWER MONITORS, INC Underground monitoring system and method
7714592, Nov 07 2007 Current Technologies, LLC System and method for determining the impedance of a medium voltage power line
7720619, Aug 04 2006 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting high-impedance faults in a multi-grounded power distribution system
7725295, Nov 01 2006 HITACHI ENERGY LTD Cable fault detection
7742393, Jul 24 2003 HUNT TECHNOLOGIES, INC Locating endpoints in a power line communication system
7764943, Mar 27 2006 Current Technologies, LLC Overhead and underground power line communication system and method using a bypass
7795877, Nov 02 2006 Current Technologies, LLC Power line communication and power distribution parameter measurement system and method
7795994, Jun 26 2007 CHEMTRON RESEARCH LLC Power line coupling device and method
7804280, Nov 02 2006 S&C Electric Company Method and system for providing power factor correction in a power distribution system
7930141, Nov 02 2007 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED Communicating faulted circuit indicator apparatus and method of use thereof
8421444, Dec 31 2009 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. Compact, two stage, zero flux electronically compensated current or voltage transducer employing dual magnetic cores having substantially dissimilar magnetic characteristics
8497781, Oct 22 2004 ATECNUM CORPORATION Power supply and communications controller
8594956, Nov 02 2007 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED Power line energy harvesting power supply
8786292, Dec 06 2010 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Power conductor monitoring device and method of calibration
9182429, Jan 04 2012 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Distribution line clamp force using DC bias on coil
9229036, Jan 03 2012 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Energy harvest split core design elements for ease of installation, high performance, and long term reliability
9448257, Jan 04 2012 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Distribution line clamp force using DC bias on coil
9581624, Aug 19 2014 Southern States, LLC Corona avoidance electric power line monitoring, communication and response system
9933463, Nov 23 2011 Analog Devices International Unlimited Company Current measurement
9954354, Jan 06 2015 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Methods and apparatus for mitigation of damage of power line assets from traveling electrical arcs
9984818, Dec 04 2015 SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC Current harvesting transformer with protection from high currents
20040156154,
20050073200,
20080077336,
20090058582,
20090171602,
20090309754,
20100085036,
20110032739,
20120039062,
20120236611,
20130162136,
20140062221,
20140145858,
20140174170,
20140192458,
20140226366,
20140253140,
20140260598,
20150198667,
20160116505,
20170199533,
20180143234,
20190339319,
EP1508146,
EP1938159,
EP2340592,
EP2350764,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Sep 18 2019SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC(assignment on the face of the patent)
Sep 18 2019RUMRILL, RONALD S SENTIENT ENERGY, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0507170889 pdf
Mar 30 2020SENTIENT ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLCSENTIENT ENERGY, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0528710328 pdf
Mar 30 2020SENTIENT ENERGY, INC SENTIENT ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0528050571 pdf
Jun 06 2020SENTIENT ENERGY, INC SENTIENT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0528870333 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Sep 18 2019BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).
Oct 01 2019SMAL: Entity status set to Small.
May 18 2021BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).
Feb 10 2025REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jun 22 20244 years fee payment window open
Dec 22 20246 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 22 2025patent expiry (for year 4)
Jun 22 20272 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jun 22 20288 years fee payment window open
Dec 22 20286 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 22 2029patent expiry (for year 8)
Jun 22 20312 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jun 22 203212 years fee payment window open
Dec 22 20326 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 22 2033patent expiry (for year 12)
Jun 22 20352 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)