An embodiment of a control system includes a current command module configured to receive a torque command and output a current command for controlling a direct current (dc) motor, and a supply current limiting module configured to receive a supply current limit as an input and actively compute a motor current limit based on the supply current limit, the supply current limiting module configured to limit the current command based on the motor current limit.
|
1. A control system comprising:
a supply current limiting module configured to receive a supply current limit and actively compute a motor current limit based on a non-linear function of the supply current limit; and
a current command module configured to receive a torque command, to receive the motor current limit from the supply current limiting module, to compute an initial current command, and to compute a limited current command, for controlling a brushed direct current (dc) motor, based on the torque command, the motor current limit, and the initial current command.
10. A method of controlling a brushed direct current (dc) motor, comprising:
receiving a supply current limit as an input of a supply current limiting module;
actively computing, by the supply current limiting module, a motor current limit based on a non-linear function of the supply current limit;
receiving a torque command and the motor current limit at a current command module;
computing, at the current command module, an initial current command;
computing, at the current command module, a limited current command based on the torque command, the motor current limit, and the initial current command; and
controlling the brushed dc motor based on the limited current command.
6. A control system comprising:
a supply current limiting module configured to receive a supply current limit and actively compute a motor current limit based on the supply current limit; and
a current command module configured to receive a torque command, to receive the motor current limit from the supply current limiting module, to compute an initial current command, to compute a motor current limit, and to compute a limited current command, for controlling a brushed direct current (dc) motor, based on the torque command, the motor current limit, and the initial current command; and
wherein the supply current limiting module is configured to compute the motor current limit using a non-linear power equation that is based on operating conditions of the brushed dc motor, wherein the power equation is represented by:
VECUIs−RcIs2=Pe, wherein VECU is a voltage input to a motor control system, Is is a supply current to the brushed dc motor, Rc is an input resistance of the motor control system, and Pe is an electrical power input to a motor control system, and Pe is represented by:
υm is a motor voltage, im is a motor current based on the motor current limit, Rm is an electrical resistance of the dc motor, ωm is a rotational speed of the brushed dc motor, vB is a brush drop voltage, and Ke is a constant.
2. The system of
3. The system of
4. The system of
5. The system of
VECUIs−RcIs2=Pe, wherein VECU is a voltage input to a motor control system, Is is a supply current to the brushed dc motor, Rc is an input resistance of the motor control system, and Pe is an electrical power input to a motor control system and is based on the motor current limit.
7. The system of
8. The system of
9. The system of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
VECUIs−RcIs2=Pe, wherein VECU is a voltage input to a motor control system, Is is a supply current to the brushed dc motor, Rc is an input resistance of the motor control system, and Pe is an electrical power input to a motor control system and is based on the motor current limit.
vm is a motor voltage, im is a motor current based on the motor current limit, Rm is an electrical resistance of the dc motor, ωm is a rotational speed of the brushed dc motor, vB is a brush drop voltage, and Ke is a constant.
16. The method of
17. The method of
|
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/341,349, filed May 25, 2016 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to methods and systems for controlling or managing DC machines, and more particularly to methods and systems for limiting supply current to DC machines.
Electrical power steering (EPS) systems use an electric motor as an actuator to provide assist to a driver while steering a vehicle and/or to provide vehicle control. Brushed DC machines are widely used in the Electric Power Steering (EPS) industry for low-cost applications and platforms. Electric drive systems employing such machines require fewer sensors and low-cost electronic circuitry and are able to deliver good performance through the entire operating space.
In order to protect the voltage source (e.g., a car battery) to the motor control system, a voltage versus supply current limit is typically imposed. This may be in the form of a table calibrated offline or an online limit that is sent to the motor control system. Given this supply current limit, the motor current command must be modified in order to ensure that the system does not draw any more current than specified at the cost of reduced torque capability, so that the voltage source is protected.
An embodiment of a control system includes a current command module configured to receive a torque command and output a current command for controlling a direct current (DC) motor, and a supply current limiting module configured to receive a supply current limit as an input and actively compute a motor current limit based on the supply current limit, the supply current limiting module configured to limit the current command based on the motor current limit.
An embodiment of a method of controlling a direct current (DC) motor includes receiving a torque command and outputting a current command for controlling a direct current (DC) motor, receiving a supply current limit as an input, actively computing, by a supply current limiting module, a motor current limit based on the supply current limit, and limiting the current command based on the motor current limit.
These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
Referring now to
The actuator motor 19 is a direct current (DC) electric machine or motor. In one embodiment, the motor 19 is a brushed DC motor. The brushed DC motor includes a stator and a rotor. The stator includes a brush housing having a plurality of circumferentially spaced brushes disposed about a commutator, each brush having a contact face that is in electrical contact with the commutator. Although embodiments described herein are applied to a permanent magnet brushed DC motor, they are not so limited and may be applied to any suitable DC machine.
As shown in
A control module 40 controls the operation of the steering system 12 based on one or more of the sensor signals and further based on the steering control systems and methods of the present disclosure. The control module may be used as part of an EPS system to provide steering assist torque and/or may be used as a driver assistance system that can control steering of the vehicle (e.g., for parking assist, emergency steering control and/or autonomous or semi-autonomous steering control).
Aspects of embodiments described herein may be performed by any suitable control system and/or processing device, such as the motor assist unit 18 and/or the control module 40. In one embodiment, the control module 40 is or is included as part of an autonomous driving system.
A processing or control device, such as the control module 40, is configured to control a DC motor such as a brushed DC motor (e.g., the motor 19) according to a control method. Aspects of the control method include executing an algorithm for actively limiting the supply current draw based on operating conditions of the DC motor and/or other components of a system that includes a DC motor (e.g., an EPS system). A supply current limit is translated to equivalent motor current limit values or curves by solving power equations of a voltage loop defined by a motor control system and the DC motor. Thereafter, the motor current limits are additionally imposed on the system using an algorithm for motor current limiting. The control method provides an added function for active supply current limiting, which determines the motor current limits for ensuring that supply current limits are met. The motor current limits generated by this algorithm may serve as additional limits to other limiting schemes presently used for DC machines.
Referring now to
In the example of
In one embodiment, the control system 50 includes a current capability limiter or current capability limiting module 64 that receives an external motor current limit (ilim), along with the other signals, and limits the enveloped torque command based on the current limit ilim. The current limiting module 64 can be connected to or include functionality that further limits the enveloped torque command to the capability limit of the motor 56.
The limited current value (irext) is then compared with capability curves of the DC machine or motor and further limited, as shown by block 68, to ensure that the control system 50 determines optimal current commands based on the operating conditions of the machine. Note that the steady state voltage-current equation is used for capability computation.
In one embodiment, the current capability module 64 (or other suitable processor) is configured to further limit the current command using motor current limits that are computed based on electrical properties of the control system 50 and the motor 56. When an additional supply current limit is imposed on the system 50, the corresponding motor current limits that will ensure that the provided supply current (Is) is not exceeded can be determined online. The power flow of a motor control system (e.g., the system 50) for a brushed DC motor (e.g., the motor 54) control system is shown in
For a given battery voltage (VBATT), and a measurement of the voltage input (VECU) to the system 50, the power equations may be solved to obtain motor current limits. The power balance equation of this system may be written as follows.
VECUIs−RcIs2=Pe
where Rc is the controller input resistance and Pe is the electrical power input to the motor control system. The expression for Pe may be represented as follows:
where vm is the motor voltage, im is the motor current, Rm is the electrical resistance of the motor circuit (e.g., including the motor 50 and power converter circuitry, not shown), ωm is the rotational speed of the motor 50, and vB is the brush drop voltage. Ke is a motor voltage or torque constant.
In the above equations, the brush drop voltage (vB) is a nonlinear function of the current (im) and is mathematically expressed as follows:
where V0 and I0 represent the brush drop voltage and current variables, respectively. Thus, the expanded power equation may be written as follows.
Thus, given a supply current limit (islim), the roots of the aforementioned equation may be determined. Due to the nonlinear nature of the equation, an iterative solver may be used to determine the roots. The roots of the following polynomial may be determined:
Since the equation for f (im) is quadratic in nature, it will have two distinct roots. From the nature of the polynomial, one root will always be positive and the other will be negative. Thus, in order for the solver to correctly determine the roots, end points (iminp) and (imaxp) for the two roots should be selected carefully. The following end points may be selected for determining the maximum positive motor current limit (imp):
iminp=0
imaxp=(1+k)(−(Keωm−V0)+√{square root over ((Keωm−V0)2+4Rm(VECUIslim−RcIslim2))})
Similarly, the following end points (iminn) and (imaxn) may be selected for determining the negative motor current limit (imn):
iminn=(1+k)(−(Keωm+V0)−√{square root over ((Keωm+V0)2+4Rm(VECUIslim−RcIslim2))})
imaxn=0
where k is a scale factor to make the end points bigger than base values, and should be chosen appropriately in order to ensure convergence. Note that other ways to determine the initial end points may also be implemented instead of the aforementioned values.
In the motor control method, a supply current limiting module 70 receives a supply current limit value (islim) and calculates motor current limits imn and imp as described above. The motor current limits (imn) and (imp) are input to the current capability limiting module 64, which generates a current command (ir) that is used by the current regulator 54 to provide a voltage command to the motor 56. In one embodiment, the motor current limits imn and imp are input from the supply current limiting module 70 to the current capability limiting module 64 as pre-limits. The current capability module 64 may further limit a current value (Irext) calculated by the current capability limiting module 64 based on motor capability.
In one embodiment, the supply current limiting module 70 implements the aforementioned equations to obtain the motor current limits (imn) and (imp), which are input to the current capability limiting module 64 or other suitable component or module. The following logic is performed:
where ilim is the external motor current limit, and irext is a current limit value or signal, which may optionally be further limited to the capability of the motor, as described above.
In one embodiment, an estimate of the controller input resistance (Rc) is used to generate the current limit signal (irext). An accurate estimate may be obtained by estimating the temperature in the appropriate part of the control system. However, if very accurate supply current limiting is not required, an overestimated high fixed value of Rc may be chosen in order to be conservative.
It is noted that the limits calculated as described herein may be a calibration, a continuously or periodically changing signal or a function of other signals (e.g., voltage). It is also noted that the algorithms and methods described herein may be implemented as a software solution without requiring additional hardware.
It is noted that, although the current capability module 64 is shown as using all of the externally provided limit, the motor current limits and the motor capability limit, embodiments described herein are not so limited. The current capability module 64 or other suitable processor can limit or adjust a current command based on one or more of the above-described limits.
Embodiments described herein provide a number of benefits and technical effects. Embodiments provide effective techniques for limiting the supply current draw of an EPS or other system that utilizes a DC motor, which are important for protecting a battery or other power source.
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description.
Pramod, Prerit, Kleinau, Julie Ann, Namburi, Krishna Mohan Pavan
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3762240, | |||
6392418, | Sep 16 1999 | Steering Solutions IP Holding Corporation | Torque current comparison for current reasonableness diagnostics in a permanent magnet electric machine |
7042227, | Sep 16 1999 | PACIFIC CENTURY MOTORS, INC ; GM Global Technology Operations, Inc | Current determination in a permanent magnet electric machine |
7584816, | Jun 08 2004 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Power steering apparatus |
7849957, | Jul 14 2006 | NSK Ltd. | Control apparatus for electric power steering |
20080027609, | |||
20090079375, | |||
20090234538, | |||
20150207438, | |||
20170334478, | |||
CN101044341, | |||
CN101314361, | |||
CN101397029, | |||
CN102145708, | |||
CN102837728, | |||
CN1141098, | |||
CN1278219, | |||
CN1675484, | |||
CN200974476, | |||
CN203734586, | |||
JP2007282478, | |||
JP7232650, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 19 2017 | PRAMOD, PRERIT | Steering Solutions IP Holding Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 042492 | /0924 | |
May 19 2017 | NAMBURI, KRISHNA MOHAN PAVAN | Steering Solutions IP Holding Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 042492 | /0924 | |
May 21 2017 | KLEINAU, JULIE ANN | Steering Solutions IP Holding Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 042492 | /0924 | |
May 24 2017 | Steering Solutions IP Holding Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 29 2025 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 29 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 29 2026 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 29 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 29 2029 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 29 2029 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 29 2030 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 29 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 29 2033 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 29 2033 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 29 2034 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 29 2036 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |