Described herein is a method for filling seal caps and a corresponding automated device for filling seal caps.
The method for filling seal caps includes carrying out the filling of the seal caps using an automated process, wherein positioning a filling unit and/or positioning the seal caps by means of movement in an xyz coordinate system as well as filling the seal caps is automated, and wherein the seal caps are positioned on a support plate.
|
1. A method for filling seal caps for sealing connecting elements in aircraft construction, the method comprising:
filling the seal caps with sealant using an automated process, wherein
positioning a filling unit and/or positioning the seal caps by means of movement in an xyz coordinate system as well as filling the seal caps is automated; and
wherein the seal caps are positioned on a support plate in a positioning pattern that corresponds to a positioning pattern of the connecting elements to be sealed; and
wherein the seal caps are plastic caps comprising at least one high-performance polymer selected from the group consisting of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polysulfone (PSU), polyphenylene sulfone (PPSU), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyimide (PI), polyamideimide (PAI), polybenzimidazole (PBI), polyetherimide (PEI), and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), the sealant is a sealant based on polysulfide and/or polythioether and the plastic caps and the sealant are joined cohesively to one another.
9. A method for filling seal caps for sealing connecting elements in aircraft construction, the method comprising:
filling the seal caps with sealant using an automated process, wherein
positioning a filling unit and/or positioning the seal caps by means of movement in an xyz coordinate system as well as filling the seal caps is automated; and
wherein the seal caps are positioned on a support plate in a positioning pattern that corresponds to a positioning pattern of the connecting elements to be sealed;
wherein the seal caps are plastic caps consisting predominately of at least one high-performance polymer and having a din iec 60243 breakdown strength of at least 10 kV/mm, wherein the high performance polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polysulfone (PSU), polyphenylene sulfone (PPSU), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyimide (PI), polyamideimide (PAI), polybenzimidazole (PBI), polyetherimide (PEI), and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS);
wherein the sealant has high energy absorbency, is a sealant based on polysulfide and/or polythioether and also comprises at least one filler selected from the group consisting of hollow filling bodies filled with gas and/or air; and
wherein the plastic caps and the sealant are joined cohesively to one another.
2. The method according to
3. The method according to
4. The method according to
6. The method according to
7. The method according to
8. The method according to
|
This application is the national stage entry of PCT/EP2017/068793, filed on Jul. 25, 2017, which claims the benefit of priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2016 213 669.0, filed Jul. 26, 2016 and to German Patent Application No. 10 2016 214 201.1, filed Aug. 2, 2016, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Within the aircraft industry, rivets or rivet heads are typically coated with a sealing agent (sealant) or, in the cured state, with a seal cap, in order to seal them off or to provide protection from corrosion. The sealing agent is generally applied manually, carried out for example with cartridge guns that are guided by hand.
As an alternative to this, it is also possible to use seal caps, which are produced from sealing agent but have already undergone curing, these caps being supplied in a corresponding contour to the rivet or the rivet head. These cured seal caps may then be used further in a variety of ways:
In one instance, the cured seal caps may be filled with fresh sealant and deep-frozen in order to prevent the sealant reacting. Shortly before use, the caps are thawed and are then ready for service. This method, however, has the disadvantage that the seal caps filled with frozen sealant have only a limited storage life, must first be conditioned prior to service, and, moreover, carry a risk of forming condensation. Another disadvantage lies in the logistical chain, which requires rapid transport and also the provision of deep freezers.
Alternatively, the seal caps may also be filled with sealant manually, using a cartridge gun, directly before their application, after which they are processed. This method, however, is unable to ensure uniform filling of the seal caps, since in this operational step they cannot be weighed. The amount injected may therefore also be over or underdosed. This procedure, moreover, is very time-consuming and inconvenient, requiring the handling simultaneously of cartridge gun and sealant cap, and requiring the cap to be mounted promptly.
It was an object of the present invention, therefore, to provide a method for filling seal caps that does not have the disadvantages identified above. The filling of the seal caps with sealant is to take place in particular in a time-saving manner but with high quality, and at the same time is to result in a reduction in cost.
The present invention provides a method for filling seal caps, and also a corresponding automated device.
The underlying object of the present invention is achieved by means of the method according to claim 1. Preferred embodiments are specified in the dependent claims.
The method of the invention can be used for filling seal caps which have already undergone curing. In that case the filled sealant may be frozen, as described above, to be used after a certain storage time, or else, as likewise already set out above, can be filled shortly before the seal cap is mounted. With preference the seal caps are not frozen, but are instead filled shortly before being mounted, thereby allowing the costs to be reduced, since there is no need for deep freezers to be provided and also no need to maintain a cooling chain.
In the method of the invention for filling seal caps, the filling of the seal caps is carried out automatedly, wherein the positioning of the filling unit and/or the positioning of the cured seal caps by means of movement in XYZ direction as well as the filling of the seal caps take place automatedly and wherein the cured seal caps are positioned on a support plate. Relative to the known, manual filling of the seal caps, this results in a time saving of up to 100%.
The automation of the filling procedure is for example under software control, with either the seal caps located on the support plate and/or the filling unit of the device, from which the sealant is filled into the seal cap, being moved in X, Y or Z direction. Preferably this is done using a robot or a similar device with XYZ travel, allowing either the support plate together with the seal caps, and/or the filling unit, to be moved automatedly in order for the sealant to be filled in on correct positioning.
In a further-preferred embodiment, the method of the invention may also comprise the automated mounting of the seal cap after it has been filled.
The object on which the present invention is based is further achieved by the device according to claim 10.
In accordance with the invention, a device or robot of this kind comprises
An example of a corresponding robot is illustrated in
Referring to
A filled seal cap 17 is shown in
The filling unit preferably comprises an extrusion unit with which the sealant is pressed from a corresponding container into the seal cap. The device of the invention to be used comprises more particularly a cartridge extrusion unit with compressed-air drive or servo drive as filling unit, and cartridges filled with ready-made sealant are inserted into the extrusion unit, from which cartridges the sealant is then extruded on filling. It is, however, also possible for the extrusion unit to comprise a mixing vessel in which, from two different lines, the two components are filled in and subsequently mixed, so that the sealant is produced directly prior to filling.
The cartridge extrusion unit preferably has a servo drive. In this case the cartridge is filled with the sealant and is pressed out by means of a piston which is controlled via the servo drive. With particular preference the servo drive is suitable for two different cartridge sizes which are commonplace within the aircraft industry. As a result, there is no need for an air-assisted pressing unit, and so compressible sealants (sealants which are not newtonian fluids and which are compressed during extrusion) can be used.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the automated device is portable. In this case, then, the device has dimensions and a configuration such as to allow a rapid set-up and take-down of the device. A portable device allows set-up directly at the premises of the user, who is able consequently to mount the seal caps on the respective rivet or rivet head without a time delay.
The significant increase in operating speed as a result of filling by means of an automated device, such as a suitable robot system, for example, also allows an increase in the cycle rate in aircraft construction if the activities performed manually during the filling and mounting of the seal caps are reduced.
Where a suitable robot system is used, the average time for the filling of a seal cap with sealant is, for example, only 2.5 seconds. In comparison to this, in the case of manual filing, the procedure is time-consuming.
The automated device, preferably the robot, is able to inject the sealant, in one preferred embodiment, into the seal caps in the arrangement dictated by the support plate. The seal caps in this case are fastened in a freely selectable arrangement on the support plate, this arrangement of the seal caps on the support plate either having been programmed into the software of the control unit beforehand, or the control unit comprising a—for example—optical recognition unit which is capable, during or before the filling of the seal caps, of determining the position of the other seal caps and directing them correspondingly with the filling unit.
The number of seal caps on the support place can be varied within a wide range and is dependent only on the size of the seal cap in relation to the size of the support plate. The seal caps can also be positioned on the support plate in such a way that the positioning pattern on the support plate is similar to or indeed corresponds to the positioning pattern of the rivets or rivet heads on the actual component. This makes it easier to recognize the correct position for the seal cap to be applied.
The robot is able to inject the sealant, in one preferred embodiment, into the seal caps in the contour dictated by the support plate.
The amount of sealant to be injected is dependent on user requirements and may be specified for each seal cap in accordance with its geometry and with the geometry of the rivet or rivet head. In one preferred embodiment, prior to the filling, the standardized amount for the particular size of seal cap is stored in a suitable program of the control unit. On the basis of these stored data, the automated device, preferably the robot, is then able to fill the respectively correct amount into the seal cap.
As a result, over and/or underdosing of the seal cap with too little or too much sealant is avoided. At the same time, the formation of condensation by the thawing seal caps with sealant prepared by mixing is prevented as well.
The extrusion rate or filling rate of the sealant, or the filling time, can be adjusted preferably via corresponding adjustments on the device, preferably the robot. The filling rate is preferably adapted to the properties of the sealant, particularly the viscosity, the rheology and/or the stringing. Through such adjustments, the aim is to achieve an optimized filling pattern (height and silhouette of the filling in the seal cap) that meets the requirements of the user, particularly the surface requirements imposed on the filling. In one preferred embodiment, the surface of the sealant filling has a planar or level cross section and does not have an elevation which ends in a point and which is formed, for example, when the speed at which the filling unit lifts from the filling is not matched to the stringing properties of the sealant.
The cure rate of the sealant in the seal cap may also be adapted by selecting a faster sealant, something which is not possible, in contrast, when using deep-frozen seal caps.
According to a first, especially preferred embodiment, the seal caps are plastic caps for the sealing of joining elements in aircraft construction, said caps consisting predominantly of at least one high-performance polymer and having a DIN IEC 60243 breakdown strength of at least 10 kV/mm.
These plastic caps are filled with a sealant which has a high energy absorbency and also with at least one filler selected from the group consisting of hollow filling bodies filled with gas and/or air. The plastic caps and the sealant here are joined cohesively to one another.
Seal caps of this kind function as combined protection against fuel and hydraulic oil, especially that based on tributyl phosphate, and also against lightning strike, and can be produced and applied economically.
The following definitions are to apply here:
Reference presently to “high-performance polymer” is to homopolymers and copolymers which are distinguished by high chemical stability and thermal stability.
The concept of the “plastic caps [ . . . ] consisting predominantly of at least one high-performance polymer” means that they may also include an amount of less than 50 wt % of other constituents which are not high-performance polymers.
The phrase “the plastic caps and the sealant are joined cohesively to one another” should be understood to mean that the filled-in sealant and the at least one high-performance polymer cannot be parted from one another without destruction or do not part under the conditions which are usual in the operation of an aircraft.
The at least one high-performance polymer of the plastic caps is selected more particularly from the group consisting of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polysulfone (PSU), polyphenylene sulfone (PPSU), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyimide (PI), polyamideimide (PAI), polybenzimidazole (PBI), polyetherimide (PEI), and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS).
The sealant filled into the plastic caps is preferably a sealant based on polysulfide and/or polythioether. With particular preference it is a polysulfide and/or a polythioether in combination with manganese dioxide, an isocyanate compound, an isocyanate prepolymer and/or an epoxide compound as hardener.
The use as fillers of hollow filling bodies filled with gas and/or air has the advantage that the microcellular character of such bodies endows them with an energy-absorbing activity. The hollow filling bodies filled with gas and/or air are preferably microballoons.
With seal caps of this kind, precise filling—of the kind enabled by the present invention—is particularly important, since expelled sealant is not resistant to hydraulic oil.
According to a second especially preferred embodiment, the seal caps are caps produced using nozzles described in EP 2 586 537 A1. These nozzles for the application of sealants have a nozzle tip in bell or cowl form, and a clamping ring of the injection side of an elongated nozzle element. Injection may take place manually or with automated sealant injection machines.
With seal caps of this kind, precise filling—as enabled by the present invention—is likewise particularly important.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10051767, | Sep 28 2012 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for covering a fastener system |
3470787, | |||
4382049, | Nov 30 1981 | McDonnell Douglas Corporation | Forming a lightning spark isolation barrier |
4519974, | Aug 12 1983 | VOUGHT AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC | Method and apparatus for applying a sealant to exposed fasteners |
4526215, | Jul 14 1983 | International Paint | Apparatus for forming mixtures of fluids |
4923348, | Feb 13 1989 | Tremco Incorporated | Protective cap construction and method |
4971745, | Oct 15 1984 | VOUGHT AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC | Method for applying a precision amount of sealant to exposed fasteners |
5454406, | May 13 1994 | Eaton Corporation | Automatic beverage dispenser |
6001181, | Aug 01 1997 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Automated sealant applicator |
6127457, | Sep 03 1996 | Marine Manufacturing Industries Inc. | Composition of polydimethysiloxane and microballoons |
6365226, | Jan 11 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method of forming a sealant ring within a throttle body assembly |
6863092, | Oct 28 2002 | Specialty Equipment Conveyor Company | Apparatus and method for filling liquid containers |
7134666, | Dec 09 1999 | Sealants Europe SAS | Support for storing, transporting and using devices applying a sealing compound and uses thereof |
7438974, | Sep 28 2001 | PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL, INC | Premixed and frozen seal caps |
8616868, | Feb 28 2011 | Physical Systems, Inc.; PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, INC | Sealant mold fixture for a domed cap |
8717736, | Jan 17 2012 | Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation | Lightning protection fastener and mounting method thereof |
9228604, | Feb 10 2011 | Airbus Operations Limited | Cap for forming sealed cavity around fastener |
9447808, | Apr 11 2012 | PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL, INC | Nut plate seal caps |
20020159919, | |||
20040011284, | |||
20120219380, | |||
20140079871, | |||
20140091175, | |||
20140234050, | |||
20140235083, | |||
20140341675, | |||
20150034800, | |||
20150063945, | |||
20150086706, | |||
20150108685, | |||
20150321418, | |||
20160114348, | |||
20160136859, | |||
20160279863, | |||
20170298979, | |||
EP2586537, | |||
EP2604893, | |||
KR20140036285, | |||
WO2012118855, | |||
WO2014201188, | |||
WO2018184878, | |||
WO2014201188, | |||
WO2016106364, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 25 2017 | Chemetall GmbH | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 02 2019 | BUROCK, HEINZ | Chemetall GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048137 | /0317 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 25 2019 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 04 2025 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 04 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 04 2026 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 04 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 04 2029 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 04 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 04 2030 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 04 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 04 2033 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 04 2034 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 04 2034 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 04 2036 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |