Disclosed are compositions that may be useful for forming synthetic membranes, methods of forming membranes therefrom, and membranes. In an embodiment, a membrane comprises a free hydrophilic polymer and a polyurethane, the polyurethane comprising a backbone comprising the reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and, optionally, a chain extender, wherein the backbone comprises a c2-c16 fluoroalkyl or c2-c16 fluoroalkyl ether, or the polyurethane comprises an endgroup comprising a c2-c16 fluoroalkyl or c2-c16 fluoroalkyl ether.

Patent
   11649353
Priority
Aug 28 2017
Filed
Aug 28 2018
Issued
May 16 2023
Expiry
Feb 12 2040
Extension
533 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
29
currently ok
1. A method of forming a membrane comprising the steps of:
a. forming a film from a composition comprising from 80 to 99.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition, of a solvent and from 0.5 to 20 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition, of a polymer mixture, the polymer mixture comprising:
i. from 65 to 90 wt %, based on the total weight of the polymer mixture, of a polyurethane comprising a backbone comprising the reaction product of:
1. a diisocyanate,
2. a polymeric aliphatic diol component comprising a polycarbonate diol or a polysiloxane diol, and
3. a chain extender, and
wherein the polyurethane comprises an endgroup comprising a c2-c16 fluoroalkyl or c2-c16 fluoroalkyl ether,
ii. from 10 to 35 wt %, based on the total weight of the polymer mixture, of a free hydrophilic polymer having a number average molecular weight of from 5,000 to 5,000,000 g/mol, and
b. evaporating the solvent, thereby forming a membrane.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polyurethane comprises from 0.1 wt % to 3 wt %, based on the total weight of the polyurethane, of an endgroup comprising a c2-c16 fluoroalkyl or c2-c16 fluoroalkyl ether.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component consists of a polycarbonate diol.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component comprises a polycarbonate diol and a polysiloxane diol.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component consists of a polycarbonate diol and a polysiloxane diol.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component comprises a polycarbonate diol and a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component consists of a polycarbonate diol and a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component comprises a polysiloxane diol and a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component consists of a polysiloxane diol and a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the diisocyanate is an aliphatic diisocyanate.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric aliphatic diol component is devoid of hydrophilic polymeric aliphatic diol.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the solvent comprises tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF), or a mixture thereof.
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the solvent comprises tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF), or a mixture thereof and wherein a co-solvent is present and comprises methanol, ethanol, isobutanol, propanol, methyl ethyl ketone, or a mixture thereof.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the solvent consists of tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF), or a mixture thereof and optionally a co-solvent consisting of methanol, ethanol, isobutanol, propanol, methyl ethyl ketone, or a mixture thereof.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the solvent comprises 40 wt % or more of tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF), or a mixture thereof, and methanol, ethanol, isobutanol, propanol, methyl ethyl ketone, or a mixture thereof at an amount of from 1 to 60 wt %, based on the total amount of solvent in the composition.
16. The method according to claim 1, wherein the solvent is present in an amount of 90 wt % to 99 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition.

This application is a U.S. national phase entry under 35 USC 371 of international application PCT/US2018/048310, which designated the U.S. and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 62/550,922, filed 28 Aug. 2017, U.S. Provisional Application 62/550,929, filed 28 Aug. 2017, U.S. Provisional Application 62/550,937, filed 28 Aug. 2017, European Patent Application EP17191475.7, filed 15 Sep. 2017, European Patent Application EP17191476.5, filed 15 Sep. 2017, and European Patent Application EP17191477.3, filed 15 Sep. 2017, the entire contents of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The disclosed inventions pertain to compositions that may be useful for forming synthetic membranes, methods of forming membranes therefrom, and membranes.

A sensor may comprise an analyte diffusion-limiting membrane. Without an analyte diffusion-limiting membrane, a sensor becomes saturated quickly and at low analyte concentrations. Ideally, a sensor has sufficient oxygen for adequate operation, but saturation of the target analyte at the sensor surface is prevented. An oxygen permeable membrane that restricts analyte flux to the sensing layer is thus often required. Preferred diffusion-limiting membranes are mechanically strong, biocompatible, minimize protein adsorption, have sufficient oxygen diffusivity, and are easily manufactured.

Synthetic membranes formed from polyurethanes are known. Polyurethanes have been chosen due to their ability to form films when blended with a range of solvents and ability to regulate the flux of analytes to sensors.

For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,563 discloses the casting of membranes from polyurethanes comprising surface modifying endgroups. A polyurethane with a surface modifying endgroups is a polyurethane comprising one or more endgroups at the terminal ends of the backbone of the polyurethane. The surface modifying endgroups and backbone are such that the surface activity of such a polyurethane reflects the surface activity of the surface modifying endgroups rather than the backbone.

Further techniques for forming membranes from polyurethanes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,978. A membrane formed from a blend of amphiphilic copolymer and hydrophobic polymer is disclosed. It is stated that the blend allows membranes having hydrophilic domains that control the diffusion of an analyte therethrough dispersed in a hydrophobic matrix. Polyurethanes may be employed as the amphiphilic copolymer or hydrophobic polymer.

Another technique for forming membranes is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,157,528 and 7,687,586. In these documents a biocompatible multipolymer is disclosed. The multipolymer comprises a hydrophilic soft segment and an oxygen-permeable soft segment.

Further techniques for forming membranes from polyurethanes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,255,032. A membrane comprising a blend of silicone-containing polyurethane with hydrophilic polymer is disclosed. The hydrophilic polymer may be polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate, polyvinylalcohol, polyacrylic acid, polyethers, and copolymers thereof.

Despite these documents, there is still a need for compositions for forming synthetic membranes that yield suitable mechanical properties and film quality, in a more reproducible process.

Known compositions for forming synthetic membranes may be deficient in desired performance and processing characteristics. For example, forming films from a blend of a hydrophilic polymer, such as PVP, and a hydrophobic polyurethane may present difficulty in reproducibility due to microphase separation of the dissimilar polymers. Furthermore, such membranes may suffer from reduced analyte diffusivity. These difficulties can be overcome by using strong, high boiling point organic solvents, such as dimethylacetamide (DMAc) or dimethylformamide (DMF), but this may present health and safety concerns because such solvents are not easily removed from the polymers. Furthermore, certain solvents may dissolve polymer layers on a sensor, restricting their use in certain sensor-related applications.

In accordance with an embodiment, a composition for forming a membrane comprises from 90 to 99.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition, of a solvent and from 0.5 to 10 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition, of a polymer mixture, the polymer mixture comprising from 85 to 99.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the polymer mixture, of a polyurethane and from 0.5 to 15 wt %, based on the total weight of the polymer mixture, of a free hydrophilic polymer, wherein the polyurethane comprises a backbone comprising the reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and, optionally, a chain extender, and wherein the backbone comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether or the polyurethane comprises an endgroup comprising a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

In an embodiment, a membrane comprises a free hydrophilic polymer and a polyurethane, the polyurethane comprising a backbone comprising the reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and, optionally, a chain extender, wherein the backbone comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether, or the polyurethane comprises an endgroup comprising a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

The compositions, methods, membranes, and articles disclosed herein may exhibit benefits in film formation, reproducibility, mechanical properties, anti-fouling, health and safety, improved compatibility with sensors, and/or solvent removal.

In accordance with an embodiment, a composition for forming a membrane comprises from 90 to 99.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition, of a solvent and from 0.5 to 10 wt %, based on the total weight of the composition, of a polymer mixture, the polymer mixture comprising from 85 to 99.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the polymer mixture, of a polyurethane and from 0.5 to 15 wt %, based on the total weight of the polymer mixture, of a free hydrophilic polymer, wherein the polyurethane comprises a backbone comprising the reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and, optionally, a chain extender, and wherein the backbone comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether or the polyurethane comprises an endgroup comprising a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

In an embodiment, a membrane comprises a free hydrophilic polymer and a polyurethane, the polyurethane comprising a backbone comprising the reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and, optionally, a chain extender, wherein the backbone comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether, or the polyurethane comprises an endgroup comprising a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

By a reaction product it is meant that the diisocyanate and polymeric aliphatic diol, and optionally the chain extender, are engaged in a simultaneous or sequential chemical reaction. For example, a reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and a chain extender is formed i) when the diisocyanate, polymeric aliphatic diol, and chain extender are all reacted together in a single solution, or ii) when a pre-polymer is first formed by reacting the diisocyanate and the polymeric aliphatic diol, and then this prepolymer is subsequently reacted with the chain extender.

The disclosed compositions, membranes, and sensors may have advantages over the prior art in terms of mechanical properties, such as modulus, tensile strength, elongation, or durability, analyte permeability, oxygen permeability, isotropy of mechanical properties, surface quality, use with a wider range of solvents, process reproducibility, process speed, health and safety concerns, such as easier or more expedient removal of residual solvent.

The polyurethane comprises a backbone that comprises the reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and, optionally, a chain extender. In an embodiment, the polyurethane consists of a backbone that comprises the reaction product of a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, and, optionally, a chain extender. The polyurethane further comprises an endgroup. In an embodiment, the polyurethane is linear. In an embodiment, the polyurethane is branched.

The backbone, endgroup, or both comprise a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether. By comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether it is meant that a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether moiety is present. In an embodiment, the backbone comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether. In an embodiment, the endgroup comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises an average of at least 0.1 endgroups, at least 0.25 endgroups, at least 0.5 endgroups, at least 1 endgroup, at least 1.5 endgroups, at least 1.8 endgroups, about 2 endgroups, or at least 2 endgroups comprising a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

In an embodiment, both the backbone and the endgroup comprise a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

In an embodiment, the polyurethane backbone is substantially devoid of or devoid of fluorine-containing moieties. In an embodiment, the polyurethane is substantially devoid of or devoid of endgroups comprising fluorine-containing moieties.

In an embodiment, the backbone comprises a C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether. The C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether may be incorporated into the backbone by incorporating a diol comprising C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether in the formulation from which the polyurethane is formed. In an embodiment, the polyurethane backbone comprises the residue of 1H,1H, 4H,4H-Perfluoro-1,4-butanediol, 1H,1H, 5H,5H-Perfluoro-1,5-pentanediol, 1H,1H, 6H,6H-perfluoro-1,6-hexanediol, 1H,1H, 8H,8H-Perfluoro-1,8-octanediol, 1H,1H, 9H,9H-Perfluoro-1,9-nonanediol, 1H,1H, 10H,10H-Perfluoro-1,10-decanediol, 1H,1H, 12H,12H-Perfluoro-1,12-dodecanediol, 1H,1H, 8H,8H-Perfluoro-3,6-dioxaoctan-1,8-diol, 1H,1H, 11H,11H-Perfluoro-3,6,9-trioxaundecan-1,11-diol. fluorinated triethylene glycol, or fluorinated tetraethylene glycol.

In an embodiment, the polyurethane backbone comprises a block comprising fluoroalkyl or fluoroalkyl ether having an Mn of at least 150 g/mol, at least 250 g/mol, or at least 500 g/mol. In an embodiment, the pre-polymer comprises a block comprising fluoroalkyl or fluoroalkyl ether having a Mn of at most 1500 g/mol, at most 1000 g/mol, or at most 850 g/mol.

In an embodiment, the backbone of the polyurethane comprises at least 1 wt %, at least 2 wt %, or at least 5 wt % of C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether, based on the total weight of the backbone. In an embodiment, the backbone of the polyurethane comprises at most 15 wt %, at most 10 wt %, or at most 8 wt % of C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether, based on the total weight of the backbone.

In an embodiment, the polyurethane is devoid of a hydrophilic polymer moiety. Examples of hydrophilic polymer moieties are polyethylene oxide or polyoxazoline moieties.

Diisocyanate Component

The backbone of the polyurethane comprises the residue of a diisocyanate. In an embodiment, the diisocyanate comprises an average of at least 1.9 isocyanate groups per molecule and an average of less than 2.7 isocyanate groups per molecule.

In an embodiment, the diisocyanate is aliphatic. In an embodiment, the diisocyanate is aromatic. In an embodiment, the diisocyanate comprises 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, 1,4-phenylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), tetramethylene-1,4-diisocyanate, cyclohexane-1,4-diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate (HMDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the diisocyanate comprises hexamethylene diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane 4,4′-diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the diisocyanate consists of hexamethylene diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane 4,4′-diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the diisocyanate comprises 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, or 1,4-phenylene diisocyanate. In an embodiment, the diisocyanate consists of 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, 1,4-phenylene diisocyanate, or a mixture thereof.

In an embodiment, the molecular weight of the diisocyanate is from 100 to 500 g/mol. In an embodiment, the molecular weight of the diisocyanate is from 150 to 260 g/mol.

In an embodiment, the formulation from which the polyurethane is formed comprises at least 10 wt %, at least 20 wt %, at least 25 wt %, at least 30 wt %, at least 35 wt %, or at least 40 wt % of a diisocyanate, based on the total weight of the formulation. In an embodiment, the formulation from which the polyurethane is formed comprises at most 50 wt %, at most 40 wt %, at most 35 wt %, at most 30 wt %, at most 25 wt %, or at most 20 wt % of a diisocyanate, based on the total weight of the formulation. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises at least 10 wt %, at least 20 wt %, at least 25 wt %, at least 30 wt %, at least 35 wt %, or at least 40 wt % of the residue of a diisocyanate, based on the polyurethane. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises at most 50 wt %, at most 40 wt %, at most 35 wt %, at most 30 wt %, at most 25 wt %, or at most 20 wt % of the residue of a diisocyanate, based on the total weight of the polyurethane.

Polymeric Aliphatic Diol

The polyurethane comprises the residue of a polymeric aliphatic diol. A polymeric aliphatic diol comprises two OH groups and a backbone. The OH groups may be directly attached to the backbone or may be separated by a linker. For example, a hydroxyalkyl terminated polydimethylsiloxane (carbinol terminated) is a polymeric aliphatic diol.

In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a poly(alkylene oxide), a polycarbonate, a polysiloxane, a random or block copolymer thereof, or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a poly(alkylene oxide), a polycarbonate, a random or block copolymer thereof, or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a poly(ethylene oxide) diol, a poly(propylene oxide) diol, a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol, a poly(isobutylene) diol, a polyester diol, for example a polyester diol formed from adipic acid or isophtalic acid and a monomeric diol, an alkane diol, such as a hydrogenated polybutadiene diol or a polyethylene diol, a poly(hexamethylene carbonate) diol, a poly(polytetrahydrofuran carbonate) diol, a polysiloxane diol, a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide), a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(tetramethylene oxide), a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and a polysiloxane, or a mixture thereof.

In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a poly(ethylene oxide) diol, a poly(propylene oxide) diol, a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol, a poly(isobutylene) diol, a polysiloxane diol, a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide), a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(tetramethylene oxide), a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and a polysiloxane, a random or block copolymer diol comprising a polysiloxane, or a mixture thereof.

In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a mixture of a polysiloxane diol and one or more of a poly(ethylene oxide) diol, a poly(propylene oxide) diol, a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol, a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide), and a random or block copolymer diol of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(tetramethylene oxide). In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a polycarbonate diol that comprises a poly(hexamethylene carbonate) diol or a poly(polytetrahydrofuran carbonate) diol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol consists of polycarbonate diols. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol consists of a poly(hexamethylene carbonate) diol, a poly(polytetrahydrofuran carbonate) diol, or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a polycarbonate diol having a Mn of at least 500 g/mol, at least 750 g/mol, at least 1000 g/mol, or at least 1500 g/mol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a polycarbonate diol having a Mn of at most 10,000 g/mol, at most 7500 g/mol, at most 5000 g/mol, at most 4000 g/mol, at most 3000 g/mol, or at most 2500 g/mol.

In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a polysiloxane diol, a polycarbonate diol, or a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol consists of a polysiloxane diol, a polycarbonate diol, a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol, or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a mixture of two or more of a polysiloxane diol, a polycarbonate diol, or a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol consists of a mixture of two or more of a polysiloxane diol, a polycarbonate diol, or a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises a polysiloxane diol and one or more of a polycarbonate diol and a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol consists of a polysiloxane diol and one or more of a polycarbonate diol and a poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises 15 wt % or less, 10 wt % or less, 5 wt % or less, 2 wt % or less, based on the total weight of polymeric aliphatic diol, or is devoid of hydrophobic poly(alkylene oxide). Hydrophobic poly(alkylene oxide)s are poly(propylene oxide), and poly(tetramethylene oxide). In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises 15 wt % or less, 10 wt % or less, 5 wt % or less, 2 wt % or less, based on the total weight of polymeric aliphatic diol, or is devoid of polysiloxane. An example of a polysiloxane is polydimethylsiloxane. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol comprises 15 wt % or less, 10 wt % or less, 5 wt % or less, 2 wt % or less, based on the total weight of polymeric aliphatic diol, or is devoid of, hydrophobic poly(alkylene oxide) and polysiloxane.

In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol has a Mn of at least 200 g/mol, at least 250 g/mol, at least 300 g/mol, at least 400 g/mol, or at least 500 g/mol, at least 600 g/mol, at least 700 g/mol, at least 800 g/mol, at least 900 g/mol, or at least 1000 g/mol. In an embodiment, the polymeric aliphatic diol has a Mn of at most 10,000 g/mol, at most 8500 g/mol, at most 6000 g/mol, at most 5000 g/mol, at most 4000 g/mol, at most 3000 g/mol, at most 2000 g/mol, or at most 1500 g/mol.

In an embodiment, the polyurethane is formed from a formulation that comprises at least 20 wt %, at least 30 wt %, at least 40 wt %, at least 50 wt %, or at least 60 wt % of a polymeric aliphatic diol, based on the total weight of the formulation. In an embodiment, the polyurethane is formed from a formulation that comprises at most 80 wt %, at most 70 wt %, at most 60 wt %, or at most 50 wt % of a polymeric aliphatic diol, based on the total weight of the formulation. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises at least 20 wt %, at least 30 wt %, at least 40 wt %, at least 50 wt %, or at least 60 wt % of the residue of a polymeric aliphatic diol, based on the total weight of the polyurethane. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises at most 80 wt %, at most 70 wt %, at most 60 wt %, or at most 50 wt % of the residue of a polymeric aliphatic diol, based on the total weight of the polyurethane.

Chain Extender

The polyurethane may comprise the residue of a chain extender. A chain extender is an alkane diol having from 2 to 20 carbon atoms, wherein one or more carbon atoms may be substituted with oxygen. In an embodiment, the chain extender has a molecular weight of at least 60 g/mol, at least 70 g/mol, at least 80 g/mol, at least 90 g/mol, or at least 100 g/mol. In an embodiment, the chain extender has a molecular weight of at most 500 g/mol, at most from 400 g/mol, at most 300 g/mol, at most 200 g/mol, or at most 150 g/mol. In an embodiment, the chain extender comprises ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, or 1,8-octanediol.

In an embodiment, the polyurethane is formed from a formulation that comprises at least 1 wt %, at least 2 wt %, at least 5 wt %, at least 8 wt %, or at least 10 wt % of a chain extender, based on the total weight of the formulation. In an embodiment, the polyurethane is formed from a formulation that comprises at most 20 wt %, at most 15 wt %, at most 12 wt %, at most 10 wt %, at most 8 wt %, or at most 5 wt %, of a chain extender, based on the total weight of the formulation. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises at least 1 wt %, at least 2 wt %, at least 5 wt %, at least 8 wt %, or at least 10 wt % of the residue of a chain extender, based on the total weight of the polyurethane. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises at most 20 wt %, at most 15 wt %, at most 12 wt %, at most 10 wt %, at most 8 wt %, or at most 5 wt %, of the residue of a chain extender, based on the total weight of the polyurethane.

Endgroups

In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises one or more endgroups. An endgroup is a moiety present at a terminal end of a molecule. In an embodiment, the polyurethane is linear and comprises an endgroup at each terminus of the backbone. In an embodiment, the endgroup is linear. In an embodiment, the endgroup is branched. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises an average of at least 0.1 endgroups, at least 0.25 endgroups, at least 0.5 endgroups, at least 1 endgroup, at least 1.5 endgroups, at least 1.8 endgroups, about 2 endgroups, or at least 2 endgroups. In an embodiment, the polyurethane comprises an average of at most 4 endgroups an average of at most 2 endgroups, or an average of at most 2 endgroups.

An endgroup may be formed by reacting a terminal isocyanate group present after forming the polymer backbone with a coreactive group on a monofunctional moiety. For instance, a terminal isocyanate group may be reacted with 1-octanol or octylamine to form a C8alkyl endgroup. Endgroups may also result from the inclusion of chain stoppers, such as monofunctional alcohols, in a formulation used in the formation of a polyurethane. For instance, a formulation for forming a polyurethane may comprise a diisocyanate, a polymeric aliphatic diol, a chain extender, and a monofunctional alcohol.

In an embodiment, the endgroup comprises a hydrophobic poly(alkylene oxide), a hydrophilic poly(alkylene oxide), a copolymer comprising a hydrophilic poly(alkylene oxide) and a hydrophobic poly(alkylene oxide), a polysiloxane, C2-C20 alkyl, C2-C16 fluoroalkyl, C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether, or copolymers thereof. In an embodiment, the polysiloxane is a poly(dimethylsiloxane). In an embodiment, the hydrophilic poly(alkylene oxide) is poly(ethylene oxide). In an embodiment, the hydrophobic poly(alylene oxide) is poly(propylene oxide) or poly(tetramethylene oxide). In an embodiment, the endgroup comprises a hydrophobic poly(alkylene oxide), a hydrophilic poly(alkylene oxide), a copolymer comprising a hydrophilic poly(alkylene oxide) and a hydrophobic poly(alkylene oxide), C2-C20 alkyl, C2-C16 fluoroalkyl, C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether, or copolymers thereof. Such endgroups may be formed with monofunctional alcohols, including carbinols, or amines of the foregoing.

In an embodiment, the endgroup comprises C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether. Such endgroups may be formed with monofunctional alcohols or amines comprising C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether.

In an embodiment, the endgroup is formed from a monofunctional alcohol or amine comprising C2-C16 fluoroalkyl or C2-C16 fluoroalkyl ether. In an embodiment, the endgroup is formed from 1H,1H-Perfluoro-3,6-dioxaheptan-1-ol, 1H, 1H-Nonafluoro-1-pentanol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-hexyl alcohol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-3,6,9-trioxadecan-1-ol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-heptyl alcohol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-3,6-dioxadecan-1-ol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-octyl alcohol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-nonyl alcohol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-3,6,9-trioxatridecan-1-ol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-decyl alcohol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-undecyl alcohol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-lauryl alcohol, 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-myristyl alcohol, or 1H,1H-Perfluoro-1-palmityl alcohol.

In an embodiment, the endgroup is monomeric and has a molecular weight of 200 g/mol or more, 300 g/mol or more, or 500 g/mol or more. In an embodiment, the endgroup is monomeric and has a molecular weight of 1,000 g/mol or less or 800 g/mol or less. In an embodiment, the endgroup is polymeric and has a Mn of 10,000 g/mol or less, 8,000 g/mol or less, 6,000 g/mol or less, or 4,000 g/mol or less. In an embodiment, the endgroup is polymeric and has a Mn of 500 g/mol or more, 1,000 g/mol or more, or 2,000 g/mol or more.

In an embodiment, the endgroup is present in an amount of at least 0.1 wt %, at least 0.2 wt %, at least 0.3 wt %, or at least 0.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the formulation from which the polyurethane is formed. In an embodiment, the endgroup is present in an amount of at most 3 wt %, at most 2 wt % or at most 1 wt %, based on the total weight of the formulation from which the polyurethane is formed. In an embodiment, the endgroup is present in an amount of at least 0.1 wt %, at least 0.2 wt %, at least 0.3 wt %, or at least 0.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the polyurethane. In an embodiment, the endgroup is present in an amount of at most 3 wt %, at most 2 wt % or at most 1 wt %, based on the total weight of the polyurethane.

Formation of Polyurethanes

The polyurethanes may be formed as generally known in the art. A catalyst may be employed. In an embodiment, the catalyst is stannous octoate or dibutyltin dilaurate. Amine catalysts may also be used.

Free Hydrophilic Polymer

The membrane or composition for forming a membrane comprises a free hydrophilic polymer. A free hydrophilic polymer is a hydrophilic polymer that is not bound to the polyurethane by covalent bonds. In an embodiment, the free hydrophilic polymer comprises poly(ethylene oxide), polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyacrylic acid, polyvinyl alcohol, polyoxazoline, such as a poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) or a poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline), or hyaluronic acid.

In an embodiment, the free hydrophilic polymer has a number average molecular weight of at least 5,000 g/mol, at least 10,000 g/mol, at least 50,000 g/mol, at least 100,000 g/mol, or at least 200,000 g/mol. In an embodiment, the free hydrophilic polymer has a number average molecular weight of at most 10,000,000 g/mol, at most 5,000,000 g/mol, at most 2,000,000 g/mol, at most 1,000,000 g/mol, at most 500,000 g/mol, or at most 200,000 g/mol.

Solvent

The compositions comprise a solvent. To form a membrane, the solvent is evaporated after casting a film from the composition comprising the polyurethane, the free hydrophilic polymer, and the solvent. In an embodiment, the solvent comprises tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF), dimethylacetamide (DMAc), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the solvent comprises tetrahydrofuran (THF) or methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF).

A co-solvent may also be present. A co-solvent comprises less than 50 wt % of the total amount of solvent. In an embodiment, a co-solvent is present and is methanol, ethanol, isobutanol, propanol, methyl ethyl ketone, or a mixture thereof. In an embodiment, the solvent comprises 50 wt % or more of tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF), or a mixture thereof and less than 50 wt % of methanol, ethanol, isobutanol, propanol, methyl ethyl ketone, or a mixture thereof.

In an embodiment, the solvent comprises 40 wt % or more of tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl-tetrahydrofuran (methyl-THF), or a mixture thereof, and methanol, ethanol, isobutanol, propanol, methyl ethyl ketone, or a mixture thereof at an amount of from 1 to 60 wt %, based on the total amount of solvent in the composition.

In an embodiment, the solvent is present in an amount of from 80 to 99.8 wt % of the composition, from 85 wt % to 99.5 wt %, or from 90 wt % to 99 wt %. In an embodiment, the co-solvent is present at less than 50 wt % of the total amount of solvent, less than 40 wt %, less than 30 wt %, less than 20 wt %, or less than 10 wt %. In an embodiment, the solvent comprises at least 40 wt % of THF, methyl-THF, or a mixture thereof, and methanol, ethanol, or a mixture thereof at an amount of from 1 to 60 wt %, based on the total amount of solvent in the composition. In an embodiment, the solvent comprises at least 40 wt % of THF, and methanol, ethanol, or a mixture thereof at an amount of from 1 to 60 wt %, based on the total amount of solvent in the composition. In an embodiment, the solvent comprises at least 70 wt % of THF, and propanol, isobutanol, methyl-THF, or methyl ethyl ketone, or a mixture thereof, at an amount of from 1 to 30 wt %, based on the total amount of solvent in the composition.

Membranes

Membranes are typically formed by casting the composition comprising the polyurethane, the free hydrophilic polymer, and the solvent directly onto a substrate, such as a sensor, or onto a support liner. The solvent is then evaporated, optionally by use of vacuum or elevated temperatures. Typical temperatures are from 40 to 90° C. Additives, such as a mold release agent, may be present to facilitate the casting process. In an embodiment, the composition further comprises a mold release agent.

In an embodiment, the membrane comprises from 85 to 99.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the membrane, of the polyurethane, and from 0.5 to 15 wt %, based on the total weight of the membrane, of the free hydrophilic polymer.

In an embodiment, a membrane is permeable to both glucose and oxygen. In an embodiment, the membrane or a membrane formed from the composition has a glucose transmission rate of from 1×10−10 to 9×10−9 cm2/sec. In an embodiment, the membrane or a membrane formed from the composition has an oxygen transmission rate of from 1×10−7 to 1×10−2 cm2/sec. In an embodiment, the membrane or a membrane formed from the composition has an oxygen transmission rate of from 1×10−5 to 1×10−3 cm2/sec.

In an embodiment, the membrane has a thickness of from 1 to 100 μm.

In an embodiment, the membrane has a residual solvent content of less than 50 ppm after drying the membrane under nitrogen for 24 hours followed by drying in a convection oven at 50° C. for one hour.

Applications

The disclosed membranes find utility in medical devices and sensors. Such sensors may detect a wide range of analytes, including glucose, lactic acid, galactose, alcohol, medicinal or recreational drugs, cholesterol, antigens, antibodies, viruses, vitamins, minerals, nutrients, proteins, amino acids, hormones or neurotransmitters. In an embodiment, a sensor for measuring glucose, lactic acid, glutamate, pyruvate, choline, acetylcholine, nitric oxide, sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, bicarbonate, urea, creatine, or dopamine in the blood stream or another bodily fluid comprises a membrane as disclosed.

In an embodiment, the membrane comprises an enzyme that is reactive with an analyte. In an embodiment, a sensor comprises the membrane and a second membrane, the second membrane comprising an enzyme that is reactive with an analyte.

The medical devices or sensors may be implantable in the body. In an embodiment, a continuous analyte monitoring system comprises the membrane. In an embodiment, a continuous glucose monitoring system comprises the membrane.

The Examples below further elucidate embodiments of the invention, but of course, should not be construed as in any way limiting the scope of the claims.

A silicone-containing polyurethane (Sil-PU), silicone-containing polyurethane with fluoroalkyl endgroups (Sil-PU-F), a polycarbonate polyurethane (PC-PU), and a polycarbonate polyurethane comprising fluoroalkyl endgruops (PC-PU-F) are formed. The polyurethanes are formed from the stated formulations with the aid of a catalyst and a mold release agent. An antioxidant may also be used. The compositions of these thermoplastic polyurethane materials used in the Examples are shown in Table 0.1. All amounts are shown in weight percent.

TABLE 0.1
Polyurethane Materials
Hydrophobic 1H,1H,2H,2H-
Aromatic polyether Silicone Polycarbonate Chain Perfluoro-1-
Material Diisocyanate diol Diol Diol Extender decanol
Sil-PU 30-40 20-30 30-40 5-10
Sil-PU-F 30-40 20-30 30-40 5-10 1
PC-PU 25-35 50-70 5-10
PC-PU-F 25-35 50-70 5-10 2

Oxygen permeability and glucose diffusivity are measured as follows.
Oxygen Permeability

Film samples are cut to the appropriate size and masked with foil to seal any leaks. The film thickness is measured. The film is mounted onto a Mocon OxTran 2/20 system and allowed to equilibrate to a constant gas transmission rate, utilizing compressed air as the test gas and 99% nitrogen with 1% hydrogen as the carrier gas. The humidity is 95%. The equilibrium gas transmission rate is recorded and the gas permeability in Barrer is calculated.

Glucose Diffusivity

A film of the sample is cut in the shape of a circle (diameter ˜6 cm) to remove any curled edges or air bubbles. The thickness of the film is measured 10 times using a thickness gauge. The average of the 10 measurements is used as the film thickness. The film is then mounted between two silicone gaskets with vacuum grease. The inner diameter of the gaskets is ˜5 cm. The gaskets are then mounted on a Franz cell apparatus with the receptor cavity filled with deionized water and a magnetic stir bar. The receptor vessel is equipped with sampling ports, in which samples can be removed over time. A top is placed on the receptor vessel which seals the film onto the Franz cell and creates the donor vessel. A concentrated glucose solution (2000 mg/dL) is inserted into the donor vessel. The Franz cell is then closed with a lid to prevent evaporation. 100 microliter samples are taken over a period of 6 hours, under stirring at 800 RPM. Deionized water is used to replace the liquid in the donor vessel and maintain sink conditions.

The liquid samples are then analyzed for glucose content using a glucose colorimetric enzyme assay and a UV plate reader. The amount of glucose in each sample is determined using a calibration curve. The slope of mg glucose/cm2 over time is determined. This flux value is then utilized to calculate the diffusivity of the glucose of each film. All films are analyzed in at least duplicate to ensure no leaks are present.

Films formed from the polyurethanes are measured for oxygen permeability in accordance with the above procedure. The results are shown in Table 1, below.

TABLE 1
Example 1 Results
Polyurethane Oxygen Permeability (Dk)
Sil-PU 25.7
Sil-PU-F 63.8
PE-PU 2.8
PC-PU-F 3.2

The compositions described in Table 2.1 are formed by thoroughly mixing the ingredients in the stated solvent. The free hydrophilic polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone, Mn of approximately 360,000 g/mol and Mw of approximately 1,000,000 g/mol. Amounts shown are the wt % of the composition.

TABLE 2.1
Example 2 Compositions
% % % % %
Sample Polyurethane PU PVP DMaC THF Co-Solvent
2A PC-PU 8 92
2B PC-PU-F 12.23 87.77
2C PC-PU-F 5.63 1.44 85.5 7.45
Methanol
2D PC-PU-F 3.99 1.0 88.90 6.12
Methanol
2E PC-PU-F 4.8 1.2 89.3 4.7 
Propanol
2F PC-PU-F 4.74 1.19 84.7 9.41
Propanol
2G PC-PU-F 4.9 1.22 89.18 4.69
Methyl-THF
2H PC-PU-F 4.79 1.20 84.61 9.40
Methyl-THF
2I PC-PU-F 9.75 90.25
2J Sil-PU 8 92
2K Sil-PU-F 8 92
2L Sil-PU-F 1.25 0.45 90.5 7.8 
Methanol
2M Sil-PU-F 1.27 0.36 90.57 7.81
Methanol
2N Sil-PU-F 6.1 0.25 91.4 2.3 
Methanol
2O Sil-PU-F 5.94 0.5 89.1 4.5 
Methanol

Films are cast from the compositions. The solvent is evaporated and the glucose diffusivity and oxygen permeability are measured. The results are shown in Table 2.2.

TABLE 2.2
Example 2 Results
Glucose Oxygen
Diffusivity Permeability
Sample Polyurethane (cm2/s) (Dk)
2A PC-PU  <6 × 10−9 2.8
2B PC-PU-F 2.65 × 10−11 2.4
2C PC-PU-F 4.77 × 10−09 3.5
2D PC-PU-F 3.71 × 10−09 1.9
2E PC-PU-F 1.68 × 10−09
2F PC-PU-F 3.41 × 10−09
2G PC-PU-F 2.32 × 10−10
2H PC-PU-F 3.79 × 10−10
2I PC-PU-F Not measured 3.2
2J Sil-PU  <6 × 10−9 25.7
2K Sil-PU-F  7.8 × 10−11 68.2
2L Sil-PU-F 2.05 × 10−9  27.3
2M Sil-PU-F <3.0 × 10−12 51.8
2N Sil-PU-F <1.0 × 10−12
2O Sil-PU-F <1.0 × 10−12 27.3

A membrane formed from PC-PU-F in THF without the use of a co-solvent or hydrophilic polymer yields membranes having a glucose diffusivity that is low (2B). Attempts to form a suitable membrane from Sil-PU-F in THF without the use of a co-solvent or hydrophilic polymer also evidences low glucose diffusivity (2K). 2L compared with 2M indicates that the amount of hydrophilic polymer must be sufficient for the composition to achieve higher glucose diffusivity. This amount of hydrophilic polymer varies based on the composition as a whole.

A membrane comprising 8 wt % Sil-PU-F, 0.1 wt % PVP, and 91.9 wt % THF cannot be cast due to very high viscosity of the resulting solution, though the PVP did appear to dissolve at this low concentration.

An aliphatic polyurethane comprising fluorinated endgroups is formed from a formulation of 28 wt % HMDI, 64.45 wt % poly(tetramethyl ene oxide) diol having an Mn of approximately 2000 g/mol, 6.50 wt % butanediol, 1.0 wt % 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-Tridecafluoro-1-octanol as an endgroup and 0.04 wt % stannous octoate as a catalyst. A film of this polyurethane is expected to have a glucose diffusivity of 6×10−9 cm2/s and an oxygen permeability of >15 Dk.

An aliphatic polyurethane comprising fluorinated endgroups is formed from a formulation of 28 wt % HMDI, 55 wt % poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol having an Mn of approximately 2000 g/mol, 7 wt % butanediol, 10 wt % 1H,1H, 8H,8H-Perfluoro-1,8-octanediol, and 0.04 wt % stannous octoate as a catalyst. A film of this polyurethane is expected to have a glucose diffusivity of 6×10−9 cm2/s and an oxygen permeability of >15 Dk.

An aliphatic polyurethane comprising silicone and fluorinated segments in its backbone is formed from a formulation of 28 wt % HMDI, 24 wt % poly(tetramethylene oxide) diol having an Mn of approximately 1000 g/mol, 6.5 wt % butanediol, 25 wt % silicone diol having a Mn of approximately 1000 g/mol, 10 wt % 1H,1H, 8H,8H-Perfluoro-1,8-octanediol, and 0.04 wt % stannous octoate as a catalyst. A film of this polyurethane is expected to have a glucose diffusivity of 6×10−9 cm2/s and an oxygen permeability of >15 Dk.

The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.

Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. While certain optional features are described as embodiments of the invention the description is meant to encompass and specifically disclose all combinations of these embodiments unless specifically indicated otherwise or physically impossible.

Al-Rashid, Jennifer, Sugiyama, Chad, Zupancich, John

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4686137, Feb 29 1980 TC1 LLC Moisture vapor permeable materials
5378268, Nov 16 1990 Atotech Deutschland GmbH Primer for the metallization of substrate surfaces
5589563, Apr 24 1992 POLYMER TECHNOLOGY GROUP, THE Surface-modifying endgroups for biomedical polymers
7157528, May 21 2003 POLYMER TECHNOLOGY GROUP, THE Permselective structurally robust membrane material
7226978, May 22 2002 DexCom, Inc. Techniques to improve polyurethane membranes for implantable glucose sensors
7687586, May 21 2003 WAVEFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC Biosensor membrane material
8050731, May 22 2002 DexCom, Inc. Techniques to improve polyurethane membranes for implantable glucose sensors
8255032, Jul 25 2003 DexCom, Inc. Oxygen enhancing membrane systems for implantable devices
8865249, May 22 2002 DexCom, Inc. Techniques to improve polyurethane membranes for implantable glucose sensors
9414778, May 15 2001 Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. Biosensor membranes
20030157277,
20030217966,
20060258761,
20070197889,
20100200541,
20110031100,
20110152654,
20120021147,
EP260587,
EP548745,
EP2295132,
EP3496845,
JP2004225019,
JP2014138881,
WO3100083,
WO2018029131,
WO2019046279,
WO2019046281,
WO2019046284,
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 28 2018DSM IP Assets B.V.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Feb 26 2020BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).


Date Maintenance Schedule
May 16 20264 years fee payment window open
Nov 16 20266 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 16 2027patent expiry (for year 4)
May 16 20292 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
May 16 20308 years fee payment window open
Nov 16 20306 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 16 2031patent expiry (for year 8)
May 16 20332 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
May 16 203412 years fee payment window open
Nov 16 20346 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 16 2035patent expiry (for year 12)
May 16 20372 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)