Methods and apparatuses are provided for allocating cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) radio transmission resources for transmitting messages in a C-V2X network from amongst a pool of initial resources from within a plurality of subframes. For each subframe in the plurality of subframes, it is determined whether transmitting in the subframe is likely to cause reception degradation with other C-V2X messages being transmitted in the network, and if yes, all resources in the subframe are excluded prior to allocating a resource for transmission.
|
1. A method, comprising: in a cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) network:
receiving a subframe that includes a plurality of resource blocks;
in response to determining whether transmitting in a resource block of the subframe is likely to cause reception degradation for C-V2X messages being transmitted in other resource blocks of the subframe, excluding all resource blocks in the subframe from allocation for transmission; and, after excluding the all resource blocks,
determining an average energy for each remaining resource block over a number n of prior subframes, wherein the number of subframes n differs for the each remaining resource block.
6. A cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) communication unit for transmitting messages in a C-V2X network, comprising:
a processor configured to receive a subframe that includes a plurality of resource blocks, to determine whether transmitting in a resource block of the subframe is likely to cause reception degradation for C-V2X messages being transmitted in other resource blocks of the subframe, and, if yes, to exclude all resource blocks in the subframe from allocation for transmission, and, after excluding the all resource blocks, to determine an average energy for each remaining resource block over a number n of prior subframes, wherein the number of subframes n differs for the each remaining resource block.
2. The method of
i) setting an initial half-duplex (“HD”) energy threshold,
ii) for each subframe in a plurality of subframes, excluding all resource blocks within a subframe in the plurality of subframes in response to at least one resource block within the subframe in the plurality of subframes having energy above the HD energy threshold,
iii) after the exclusion, in response to a number of remaining resource blocks not being greater than a predetermined percentage of initial resource blocks, increasing the HD energy threshold, and
iv) repeating steps ii and iii until the number of the remaining resource blocks is greater than the predetermined percentage of the initial resource blocks.
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
7. The C-V2X communication unit of
i) set an initial half-duplex (“HD”) energy threshold,
ii) for each subframe in a plurality of subframes, exclude all resource blocks within a subframe in the plurality of subframes if at least one resource block within the subframe in the plurality of subframes has energy above the HD energy threshold,
iii) after the exclusion, if a number of remaining resource blocks is not greater than a predetermined percentage of initial resource blocks, increase the HD energy threshold, and
iv) repeating steps ii and iii until the number of the remaining resource blocks is greater than the predetermined percentage of the initial resource blocks.
8. The C-V2X communication unit of
9. The C-V2X communication unit of
10. The C-V2X communication unit of
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/726,606 filed Dec. 24, 2019 (now allowed) and is related to and claims the priority benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/787,331 filed Jan. 1, 2019.
Embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to efficient C-V2X resource allocation, and more specifically to methods for self-allocating resource blocks in a manner that reduces the likelihood of transmission conflicts between vehicles that are likely to cause reception degradation.
The term “cellular vehicle-to-everything” or C-V2X refers to vehicular connectivity specifications defined by 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) using the LTE sidelink PC5 interface to support direct link communication between vehicles without involving a cellular base-station. A given LTE physical channel is divided into smaller fragments, both in time and frequency, which are referred to as “frames”. A frame consists of 10 subframes in the time domain. Each subframe is 1 ms wide and contains two time-slots. In the frequency domain, a LTE frame is divided into 12 subcarriers, separated from each other by 15 kHz. The subcarriers are further divided into resource blocks (RB). Each radio resource consists of one subframe (1 ms) in time and a number of RBs in frequency. Several resources can occupy a single subframe. Devices that utilize a sidelink PC5 interface must reserve or “allocate” a resource for transmission. After a reservation or “latency” period, the same resource is used again for the next transmission. This pattern is repeated for a few seconds, after which a new resource is allocated.
Mode 4 of the LTE sidelink PC5 interface as defined by 3GPP Release 14 requires that a transmitting device autonomously allocate a resource from amongst a pool of potential resources. Thus the sidelink PC5 (Mode 4) allocation scheme as applied to C-V2X involves the C-V2X device listening to the communication channel and keeping a record of all received signals from other vehicles over the last 1 second (1000 subframes). This record is utilized to make intelligent resource selection decisions by excluding resources deemed too busy. A resource is then selected from amongst the non-excluded resources using a randomly selected counter. Release 15 of 3GPP follows the same resource allocation scheme. Release 16 is likely to follow the same scheme as well, renaming it as Mode 2.
It is important to note that while a single subframe includes multiple resources, an inherent limitation exists in the LTE sidelink PC5 in that a device transmitting in a subframe is disabled from receiving transmissions in that same subframe. Moreover, if several devices transmit in the same subframe, a receiving device within range of the transmitting devices might not be able to receive all of the transmissions, as the dynamic range of the receiving device's radio transceiver is not capable of coping with both the strongest and weakest signals.
As a result of the above limitations, the resource selection decision is an important one. Poor resource selection will limit the communication range of the transmission (e.g. if another vehicle transmits in the selected resource with a stronger signal), while a good selection decision will choose the resource with minimal interference to other vehicles. However, the existing scheme often results in a poor selection decision, because resources are probed individually without considering the utilization, or lack thereof, of other resources in the same subframe.
Thus, there remains a need for, and it would be advantageous to have, a more efficient allocation scheme which makes allocation decisions that consider the utilization of other resources in the same subframe.
In various embodiments, there are provided, in a C-V2X communication unit for transmitting messages in a C-V2X network, methods for allocating radio transmission resources from amongst a pool of initial resources, the pool of resources comprised within a plurality of subframes, a method comprising determining, for each subframe in the plurality of subframes, whether transmitting in the subframe is likely to cause reception degradation with other C-V2X messages being transmitted in the network, and if yes, excluding all resources in the subframe prior to allocating a resource for transmission.
In various embodiments, there is provided a C-V2X communication unit for transmitting messages in a C-V2X network, the C-V2X communication unit configured to allocate radio transmission resources from amongst a pool of initial resources, the pool of resources comprised within a plurality of subframes, the C-V2X communication unit comprising a processor configured to determine, for each subframe in the plurality of subframes, whether transmitting in the subframe is likely to cause reception degradation with other C-V2X messages being transmitted in the network, and if yes, exclude all resources in the subframe prior to allocating a resource for transmission.
In some embodiments, the determining whether transmitting in the subframe is likely to cause reception degradation and if yes, excluding all resources in the subframe includes: a) setting an initial half-duplex (“HD”) energy threshold; b) for each subframe in the plurality of subframes, excluding all resources within the subframe if at least one resource within the subframe has energy above the HD energy threshold; c) after the exclusion if the number of remaining resources is not greater than a predetermined percentage of initial resources, increasing the HD energy threshold; and d) repeating steps b) through c) until the number of remaining resources is greater than the predetermined percentage of initial resources.
In some embodiments, in step a) the initial HD threshold is set to between −70 dBm and −80 dBm, and in step b) the HD threshold is increased by between 3 dBm and 5 dBm.
In some embodiments, determining whether transmitting in the subframe is likely to cause reception degradation and if yes, excluding all resources in the subframe includes: a) setting an initial near-far (“NF”) energy threshold; b) for each subframe in the plurality of subframes, excluding all resources within the subframe if at least one resource within the subframe that is allocated has energy below the NF energy threshold; c) after the exclusion if the number of remaining resources is not greater than a predetermined percentage of initial resources, decreasing the NF energy threshold; and d) repeating steps b) through c) until the number of remaining resources is greater than the predetermined percentage of initial resources.
In some embodiments, in step a) the initial NF threshold is set to between −70 dBm and −80 dBm, and in step b) the NF threshold is decreased by between 3 dBm and 5 dBm.
In some embodiments, the NF threshold is dependent on a Channel Busy Ratio (CBR) of the network.
In some embodiments, after excluding resources, an average energy for each remaining resource over a prior n subframes is determined, wherein the number of subframes n differs for each remaining resource.
In some embodiments, the average energy for a given remaining resource is determined by detecting whether a significant allocation change event occurred for the given resource; if yes, averaging the energy of the resource beginning from a time of detected significant allocation change to present time; and otherwise, averaging the energy of the resource over the last 1 second.
In some embodiments, a significant allocation change event for a resource includes at least one of, between two consecutive subframes comprising the resource, an allocation status of the resource being flipped, and a difference in energy of the resource being greater than a predetermined threshold.
Non-limiting embodiments are herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Standard methods of allocating a C-V2X radio resource in Mode 4 of LTE sidelink PC5 involve narrowing down the pool of potential resources to a shortlist SA of available resources. The shortlist of available resources is further narrowed down to an even shorter list SB of candidate resources. A resource is then selected randomly from amongst the candidate resources. The process is iterative, in that if SA contains too few resources, SA is discarded and the entire process of narrowing down resources repeats using more relaxed exclusionary criteria until a satisfactory number of resources remain in SA.
As explained next, this known art resource allocation scheme suffers from various drawbacks.
Changed Resource Allocation During the Last Second
At step 110 of the existing method, an average RSSI value is computed for each resource in SB using an averaging period of 1 second. However, the allocation state of any given resource may have changed during the last second. By averaging over a relatively large period of 1 second (1000 subframes), the current (known) scheme fails to consider a resource's allocation state change within the last second. Consider three cases:
In a first case, if during the last 1 second a resource was initially allocated by a close vehicle (high energy) but then became unallocated (no energy), after averaging the resource will appear as having some energy, thereby obscuring the resource's current state of being unallocated.
Conversely, in a second case, if during the last 1 second a resource was unallocated (no energy) and then became allocated by a close vehicle (high energy), after averaging the resource will appear to have low energy. This resource may still be considered for selection under the current scheme even though it should in fact be excluded because of its current high energy value.
Finally, in a third case, if during the last 1 second a resource had weak energy for most of the initial portion of the last second but then changed to strong energy towards the tail end, after averaging the resource will appear to have a weak signal. In reality though, the resource should be excluded since the current high energy is likely to cause collisions.
“Half-Duplex” and “Near-Far” Problems
A further drawback with the current resource allocation scheme is based on the inherent limitation described above whereby a vehicle cannot receive transmissions in the subframe in which the vehicle is transmitting. This limitation gives rise to the well-known “half-duplex” problem, where two vehicles each transmit in different resources in the same subframe. Another limitation in C-V2X message transmission arises in which a strong signal, which may be received from a near vehicle, may drown out a weaker signal, e.g. from a vehicle further away. This has become known as the “near-far” problem.
Four vehicles 202, 204, 206 and 208 are concurrently transmitting C-V2X messages. The transmissions are labelled TX-1 212, TX-2 214, TX-3 216 and TX-4 218, respectively. Vehicles 202 and 204 each transmit in subframe 222, so these vehicles will not receive each other's messages even though they are close to one another. This is due to the half-duplex problem which arose when they each randomly selected the same subframe. Vehicles 206 and 208 each transmit in the next subframe 226, so vehicles 206 and 208 will also not receive each other's messages.
Further with reference to
Having described the existing drawbacks, various embodiments disclosed herein provide a method, executed by a C-V2X communication unit transmitting in a C-V2X network, of allocating C-V2X radio resources efficiently so as to minimize conflicts between resources in the same subframe that are likely to cause reception degradation with other C-V2X transmissions in the network. As used herein, “reception degradation” should be understood to include reception that is affected by half-duplex problems and/or near-far problems. The method considers i) the likelihood of a resource, if utilized, to cause half-duplex problems, ii) the likelihood of a resource, if utilized, to cause near-far problems, and iii) any significant allocation change events within the last 1 second, as will be explained below.
In some embodiments, the value of the NF threshold may depend on the network's channel busy ratio (CBR), with the underlying rationale being that in congested networks, i.e. networks with high CBR, near-far problems cannot be avoided anyway, so excluding resources on such basis would be too limiting. As an example of the dependency on CBR, in a network with a CBR of 15%, the NF threshold may be decreased by 15, e.g. from −80 dBm to −95 dBm. In a network with a CBR of 25%, the NF threshold may be decreased by 25, e.g. from −80 dBm to −105 dBm.
Steps 302-304 are also similar to steps in known art (steps 102-104 of
At step 308 and in contrast with known methods, resources that pose a potential NF problem are excluded. An energy value (e.g. RSSI) is computed for each remaining resource (i.e. those resources not excluded in either of steps 304 or 306). The energy value is compared with the NF threshold. As detailed above, in some embodiments, the NF threshold may be a function of the network's CBR. Each resource's energy value is compared with the NF threshold. If within any given subframe, a resource's energy value is lower than the NF threshold but is allocated (i.e. has SCI energy), all of the resources in the given subframe are excluded. Non-excluded resources are then added to the shortlist SA.
At step 310, it is determined whether the number of resources in SA is more than a predetermined percentage of the number of all initial resources, e.g. 20%. If not, too many resources were excluded in steps 304-308. At this point, the exclusionary criteria are relaxed. At step 312, the NF threshold is decreased, preferably by between about 3 dBm and 5 dBm. At step 314, the HD threshold is increased, preferably by between about 3 dBm and 5 dBm. At step 316, the SCI energy threshold is increased by 3 dB as in the known art (step 108 of
At step 318, a modified average energy value is computed for each resource in SA. The modified average energy considers significant allocation change events, as will be detailed below with reference to
At step 320, the resources in SA are sorted according to their respective modified average energy values as computed in step 318, and the lowest (i.e. weakest energy) 20% are selected as candidate resources SB. At step 322, a resource from amongst the candidate resources in SB is selected randomly.
At step 400, parameters are initialized by setting n=1. At step 402, the energy E of resource R in the nth subframe, denoted E(Rsf(n)), is determined. At step 404, the value determined in step 402 is compared with the energy E of resource R in the (n+1)th subframe, denoted E(Rsf(n+1)). At step 406, it is determined whether the allocation status flipped, meaning either the resource was allocated in sf(n) (i.e. E(Rsf(n))≠0) and not allocated in sf(n+1) (i.e. E(Rsf(n+1))=0) or vice versa. The allocation state of a resource can alternatively be determined by examining the SCI energy level. If at step 406 it is determined that the allocation status flipped, execution continues at step 414, where the average RSSI is computed for resource R between the most recent subframe and subframe sf(n). Otherwise, execution continues to step 408, where it is determined whether the difference in energy of resource R between subframes sf(n) and sf(n+1) is greater than a predetermined threshold Th. Suitable values for Th can be, for example, any value between 10-20 dB. If the difference in energy is greater than Th, execution continues at step 414, where the average RSSI is computed for resource R between the most recent subframe and subframe S(n). Otherwise, execution continues at step 410 where it is determined whether sf(n+1) is the last (i.e. oldest) subframe containing resource R. If Yes, execution continues at step 416 where the average RSSI is computed for resource R across all subframes. Otherwise, execution continues at step 412 where n is increased by one (1) and steps 402-410 are repeated until either a significant allocation change has been detected (steps 406 or 408 evaluate to true), or all subframes have been examined (step 410 evaluates to true).
It should be noted that the method described above and in
While this disclosure has been described in terms of certain embodiments and generally associated methods, alterations and permutations of the embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The disclosure is to be understood as not limited by the specific embodiments described herein, but only by the scope of the appended claims.
Haran, Onn, Toledano, Ron, Litmanovich, Oleg
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10149338, | Sep 26 2014 | SUN PATENT TRUST | Resource allocation for device to device (D2D) communication |
10390274, | Aug 25 2015 | LG Electronics Inc | Method for resource allocation in wireless communication system and apparatus therefor |
10524111, | May 09 2014 | SUN PATENT TRUST | Resource allocation for D2D discovery transmission |
10588054, | Dec 22 2016 | Volkswagen AG | Method for resource allocation in a mobile communication system and base station and participant communication module for use in the method |
10652881, | Sep 25 2016 | BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO , LTD | HARQ process identifier offset for periodic resource allocation |
10708925, | Jul 21 2016 | HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO , LTD | Resource allocation method and device |
11317382, | Sep 29 2017 | LG Electronics Inc | Method for transmitting V2X message by terminal in wireless communication system, and terminal using same method |
9596689, | Dec 18 2014 | Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. | Radio resource allocation for D2D communications |
20190305903, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 22 2021 | Autotalks Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 20 2023 | TOLEDANO, RON | Autotalks LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 065025 | /0815 | |
Jun 20 2023 | LITMANOVICH, OLEG | Autotalks LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 065025 | /0815 | |
Jul 10 2023 | HARAN, ONN | Autotalks LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 065025 | /0815 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 22 2021 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Nov 02 2021 | SMAL: Entity status set to Small. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 17 2026 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 17 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 17 2027 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 17 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 17 2030 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 17 2031 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 17 2031 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 17 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 17 2034 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 17 2035 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 17 2035 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 17 2037 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |