The invention is directed to coated fertilizer granules and methods for manufacturing granules and using organically enhanced inorganic fertilizer granules, which incorporate a coating of one or more concentric layers over a core such that the coating contains a bioactive agent such as a herbicide, pesticide, plant growth regulator, microorganism, or beneficial element. Application of the coating to the fertilizer granule preferably involves binding of the bioactive agent to the surface of granule or to the organic components within the granule. The release of the bioactive agent from the coating and or the surface of the granule preferably results in a two-phased release, a first fast release and a second extended or slow-release of the bioactive agent into the soil metering the bioavailability of the bioactive agent for crop growth or protection, and/or for controlling unwanted vegetation or pests.

Patent
   11999670
Priority
Nov 14 2018
Filed
Nov 13 2019
Issued
Jun 04 2024
Expiry
Nov 21 2039
Extension
8 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
295
currently ok
1. A method of coating hydrolyzed fertilizer granules comprising:
contacting organic material with sulfuric acid to hydrolyze the organic material forming a fluidized acidic mix;
ammoniating the fluidized acidic mix;
spraying the ammoniated fluidized acidic mix in a granulator forming hydrolyzed fertilizer granules having a matrix of inorganic nutrients and charged organic amphoteric molecules;
drying and cooling the hydrolyzed fertilizer granules; and
contacting the hydrolyzed fertilizer granules with a coating agent containing a plant growth regulator and reactive chemical groups, wherein the plant growth regulator chemically reacts with the charged organic amphoteric molecules of surfaces and/or interior portions of the matrix, forming coated fertilizer granules with embedded plant growth regulators.
6. A method of coating hydrolyzed fertilizer granules comprising:
contacting organic material with concentrated sulfuric acid to hydrolyze the organic material forming a fluidized acidic mix;
ammoniating the fluidized acidic mix;
spraying the ammoniated fluidized acidic mix in a granulator forming hydrolyzed fertilizer granules having a matrix of charged organic amphoteric molecules and inorganic nutrients;
drying the hydrolyzed fertilizer granules; and
contacting the hydrolyzed fertilizer granules with a liquid coating agent containing a liquid diamine surfactant, a liquid bioactive agent and reactive chemical groups, wherein the bioactive agent chemically reacts with the charged organic amphoteric molecules of the matrix within 200 μm of surfaces of the fertilizer granules, forming coated fertilizer granules with the bioactive agent bound to the matrix.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrolyzed fertilizer granules contain one or more of sulfate or phosphate molecules, iron molecules, or aluminum molecules, which bind to the coating agent.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the dried and coated fertilizer granules have a two-phase release profile comprising a fast release over the first two weeks following application to the soil followed by a second phase of slow release, wherein the fast release or the slow release comprises release of a nutrient and/or the bioactive agent of the fertilizer granules.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the plant growth regulator comprises a plant hormone.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the plant growth regulator includes auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, abscisic acid, and derivative and variations thereof.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the hydrolyzed fertilizer granules contain one or more of sulfate or phosphate molecules, organic molecules, iron molecules, or aluminum molecules, which bind to the coating agent.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the dried and coated fertilizer granules have a two-phase release profile comprising a fast release over the first two weeks following application to the soil followed by a second phase of slow release, wherein the fast release or the slow release comprises release of a nutrient and/or the bioactive agent of the fertilizer granules.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the bioactive agent comprises multiple strains or species of microorganisms.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the multiple strains or species of microorganisms beneficiate a target crop by replenishing depleted soil microflora, enhance transfer of one or more nutrients to a target crop, metabolize a toxic chemical or compound, perform bioremediation, and/or increase plant growth or plant production.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein the liquid coating agent comprises an oil-based agent.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the oil-based agent comprises tall oil.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the coating agent comprises an oil-based agent.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the oil-based agent comprises tall oil.
15. The method of claim 6, wherein the bioactive agent comprises one or more strains or species of microorganisms selected from the group consisting of species of Bacillus, Penicillium, Clostridium, Phycomyces, Aspergillus, and genetically engineered microorganisms.
16. The method of claim 6, wherein a second coating is added to the coated fertilizer granules.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the second coating comprises a second coating agent selected from the group consisting of an alcohol-based agent, a wax, a polymer, a urethane, a polyurethane, a crystalline paraffin, a non-crystalline paraffin, a calcium-containing agent, a sulfur-containing agent, a phosphate-containing agent, a silicon-containing agent, a metal-containing agent, a latex containing agent, and combinations thereof.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the coating diffuses within the outer 200 μm of cores of the fertilizer granules.
19. The method of claim 6, wherein the hydrolyzed fertilizer granules are cooled prior to the addition of the bioactive agent.
20. The method of claim 6, wherein the coated fertilizer granules have a coating that forms on cores of the fertilizer granules and the coating diffuses within the outer 200 μm of cores of the fertilizer granules.

This application claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 62/767,172 filed Nov. 14, 2018, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference.

This invention is directed to organic-containing inorganic fertilizers and, in particular, to the incorporation of bioactive substances such as, for example, herbicides and pesticides into fertilizer layers or coatings such that the treated fertilizer can be used as an effective inhibitor or killing agent for unwanted vegetation or pests, or to provide nutrients or other beneficial elements to crops. The organic-containing inorganic complex fertilizer may include salts of potassium, ammonium, phosphate, and sulfate, or combinations thereof.

Most fertilizers, such as those that consist of or comprise ammonium sulfate, urea, diammonium phosphate, monoammonium phosphate or calcium phosphate are not manufactured specifically to have concentric layers. Some fertilizer granules are however made with specific coatings. These coatings can help control the rate of nutrient release to treated soil and help prevent dusting of the granule itself. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,165,550 relates to the production of symmetrical fertilizer granules that are coated with polyurea-urethane to slow leaching of the granule nutrients into the soil. Other granules, as found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,679,129; 6,176,891 and 5,993,505, relate to a synthetic resin or polymer film on the surface of the granule to control the release of plant nutrients from the interior of the granule. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,074 relates to a coating of carboxyl-carrying ethylene copolymer to contain inorganic or organic fertilizer such that it is released slowly over time to the target crops.

These coatings can be expensive as raw materials and expensive and involved to apply to the fertilizer material. In addition, upon application to crops, the coatings of these granular fertilizers may introduce harmful or unwanted substances into the soil. A fertilizer product and method of production are needed that does not result in harmful or unwanted substances entering the soil.

The present invention overcomes the problems and disadvantages associated with current strategies and designs and provides new fertilizers and methods of preparing fertilizers and, in particular, coating granules of fertilizer.

One embodiment of the invention is directed to methods of coating fertilizer granules comprising: providing fertilizer granules comprised of organic material; contacting the fertilizer granules with a bioactive agent that chemically reacts with the surfaces of the fertilizer granules; and drying the fertilizer granules forming dried fertilizer granules. Preferably the organic material is sulfate-based and/or phosphate-based, and granules are contacted with a coating agent that comprises a tall oil (also called liquid rosin or tallol), latex, an amide-linked hydrocarbon compound, urethane or polyurethanes, acrylics or polyacrylics) or crystalline and or non-crystalline paraffin waxes. Preferably the fertilizer granules contain one or more of sulfate or phosphate molecules, organic molecules, or iron or aluminum molecules, which bind to the agent. Preferably the bioactive agent comprises an herbicide, a pesticide, a microbe, a plant growth regulator such as, for example, bioactive agents that are anionic, cationic, nonionic and/or lipophilic. Preferably the coated fertilizer granules further contain a refined paraffin wax coating, and further contain a surfactant that facilitates adherence of the coating and the active agent to the granule. Preferably the coating comprises from about 5 to about 40 pounds per ton of dried fertilizer granules, or from about 10 to about 25 pounds per ton of dried fertilizer granules. Preferably the dried fertilizer granules comprise from about 92% to about 100% solids, from about 96% to about 99% solids, or from about 98% to about 99% solids. Preferably the dried fertilizer granules have an increased hardness and/or crush strength as compared to fertilizer granules that have not been contacted with the agent, a reduced dust formation as compared to fertilizer granules that have not been contacted with the agent, are less absorbent as compared to fertilizer granules that have not been contacted the agent, a reduced odor as compared to fertilizer granules that have not been contacted with the agent, and/or a slow-release nutrient profile.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to dried fertilizer granules containing the coatings and/or bioactive agents disclosed and described herein that are made by the methods disclosed and described herein.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to the system of manufacturing fertilizer granules comprising a granulator and a coater for forming fertilizer granules as disclosed and described herein.

Other embodiments and advantages of the invention are set forth in part in the description, which follows, and in part, may be obvious from this description, or may be learned from the practice of the invention.

FIG. 1A. Schematic of a portion of a fertilizer granule with bioactive molecules (X) distributed around a core.

FIG. 1B. Schematic of a portion of a fertilizer granule with viable microorganisms (M) distributed around a core.

FIG. 1C. Schematic of a portion of a fertilizer granule with bioactive molecules (X) and viable microorganisms (M) distributed around a core.

FIG. 1D. Schematic of a portion of a fertilizer granule with bioactive molecules (X) and viable microorganisms (M) distributed around a core with a protective outer coating (O).

FIG. 2. Basic reaction between secondary amine on a bioactive molecule and a bisulfate molecule present in or on a fertilizer surface.

FIG. 3. Diagram of a pesticide or a plant growth regulator example—the herbicide (Atrazine) binding to a bisulfate group on surface of a fertilizer granule.

FIG. 4. Diagram of herbicide (Dinitroaniline) primary amine binding to the organic matrix contained in the outer zone of the organically-enhanced, ammonium sulfate fertilizer granule.

FIG. 5. Atrazine hound ionically to granule bisulfate surface reacts with calcium chloride or other cationic salt to form free Atrazine and either a precipitate or a bicarbonate salt on the surface of the granule.

FIG. 6. Graph showing the release of bioactive molecules, nitrogen and ammonium sulfate from fertilizers prepared as described herein over a period of days after application to soil.

Fertilizers are and have been utilized throughout the world for many years and are applied to crops routinely. Often a particular crop will require herbicides or pesticides to control unwanted weeds or pests, requiring additional applications to the crop. In addition, fertilizers are typically granular in form and thereby create significant dust that reduces the amount of fertilizer that reaches the intended target—the plant. Coated fertilizers are available, but these coating introduce harmful or unwanted substances into the soil.

A coated fertilizer has been surprisingly discovered that does not result in harmful or unwanted substances entering the soil, but instead provides multiple advantages. As disclosed and described herein, methods of coating fertilizer granules and the coated granules themselves incorporate bioactive agents. These agents preferably are incorporated into a coating or contain reactive chemical groups that interact with the fertilizer granules such that the bioactive compounds bind to components of the coating and/or diffuse within the core fertilizer granule. Preferably, the bioactive agent employed in the coating exhibits a combination of chemical functional characteristics as anionic or cationic, or suitable solubility in the organic coating and organic matrix of the granule. Coated fertilizers as described herein provide direct and/or indirect benefit to plants which include killing, inhibiting and/or controlling unwanted vegetation, pests such as insects or parasites, and preventing or controlling diseases (e.g., as may be caused by bacterial or fungal infections, or other microorganisms). Also disclosed and described herein are methods for the production and use of coated granular fertilizers and the incorporation of bioactive agents within the coatings.

The manufacture of fertilizer is well known, with most solid fertilizers manufactured in granular form. Although any fertilizer granules can be coated as described herein, preferred fertilizer granules for coating include fertilizers made from organic materials such as organically-enhanced inorganic fertilizers (e.g., see U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,513,927; 7,662,205; 7,662,206; 7,947,104; 8,105,413; 8,557,013; 8,992,654 and 9,856,178). Many desirable procedures for generating the core for the fertilizer involve high heat that kill organisms (e.g., see U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,841,515, 8,992,654, and 9,856,178) For example, many organic materials may be brought to a high temperature to achieve the USEPA's Class A standard for treatment of pathogens and then cooled. The bioactive agents can be incorporated into and/or onto the granules during the manufacturing process and preferably after the application of high heat that would otherwise destroy or damage the bioactive agent.

One embodiment of the invention is directed to coated fertilizer granules wherein the coating of the fertilizer granule contains one or more bioactive agents. Coating agents may be applied as liquids or solids (e.g., powder coatings), and include, for example, oil-based agent, alcohol-bases agents, waxes, polymers, urethanes including polyurethanes, crystalline and non-crystalline paraffins, tall oil (also called liquid rosin or tallol), calcium-containing compounds, sulfur-containing compounds, phosphate-containing compounds, silicon-containing compounds, metal-containing compounds (e.g., ferrous or ferric iron, salts of boron, magnesium, or manganese), latex compounds, fatty acids, lipids, proteins, saccharides and polysaccharides, and combinations thereof. Coatings may form hard surfaces, or be porous or non-porous surfaces. Various coatings and method and systems of coating that may be employed include, for example, those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 10,266,620 (issued Apr. 23, 2019), U.S. Pat. No. 10,207,284 (issued Feb. 19, 2019), U.S. Pat. No. 9,844,793 (issued Dec. 19, 2017), U.S. Pat. No. 9,539,371 (issued Jan. 10, 2017), and U.S. Pat. No. 9,267,052 (issued Feb. 23, 2016). Coating agents may be mixed with bioactive agents and together applied to granules or applied individually but separately. When applied separately, generally the bioactive agent would be applied to the granules and the coating agent after thereby encompassing the bioactive agent and granule.

Bioactive agents may be fluids, liquids or solids, such as dry powder (e.g., freeze dried material). Preferably a liquid bioactive agent is mixed with an agent that adheres to the fertilizer granules during processing, or a solid bioactive agent is mixed with a liquid adhering agent and applied to the fertilizer granules. Preferably incorporation involves amide based and/or wax-based coatings that are applied to the fertilizer including the utilization of specific surfactants when necessary. A bioactive agent may also serve as part or all of a coating agent.

Bioactive agents include substances e.g., (synthetic or natural chemicals, compounds, chemical constructions, enzymes, and/or microbes) that directly or indirectly benefit the soil or fauna where the fertilizer is to be applied. Examples of agents that are directly beneficial include, for example, nutrients, and plant growth regulators (e.g., plant hormones). Plant growth regulations are chemical substances that influence the growth and/or differentiation of plant cells, tissues and organs. Plant growth regulators function as chemical messengers for intercellular communication in the plant. Plant growth regulators include, for example, auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, abscisic acid, and derivative and variations thereof. Bioactive agents that provide indirect benefits include, for example, herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides that kill off or control the growth of invasive plants or infections organisms. Additional bioactive agents include microorganism, such as microorganism that fix nitrogen from the air and other sources for the benefit of plants, or beneficial microorganisms that kill or otherwise control the proliferation of harmful organisms or other microbes. In addition, preferred bioactive agents are: (a) anionic; (b) cationic; or (c) nonionic or lipophilic that are applied though the mediation of a surfactant contained in the fertilizer coating.

Examples of herbicides that can be effectively contained coatings are members of the herbicide classes of triazines, glyphosates, aryloxyphenoxy compounds, imidazolinones, isoxazolidinones, sulfonylureas, triazolpyramidines, dinitroanilines and benzoic acid herbicides among others. An example of a pesticide for these coatings is phenyl pyrazole (Fipronil) with its high solubility in wax materials and its amine binding to the fertilizer granule. Examples of such are auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, and abscisic acid as well as growth inhibitors, growth retardants and growth stimulators. Various chemicals that can be used to coat the fertilizer granule, for example, are described in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2002), in particularly the chapters discussing fertilizer granulation. Bioactive agents may comprise detergents (e.g., ionic or non-ionic), enzymes, and/or natural products (e.g., Diatomaceous earth).

Coatings of the fertilizer may contain the bioactive agent or encompass the bioactive agent such that no or substantially no bioactive agents are present on granule surfaces. Coating agents include, for example, a latex, a paraffin (e.g., crystalline or non-crystalline paraffin), an acrylamide (e.g., polyacrylamide), a urethane (e.g., polyurethane), a tall oil, a calcium-containing compound, a silicon-containing compound, or a combination thereof.

Preferably the core fertilizer granule contains a matrix comprised of organic molecules (e.g., biomass), especially amphoteric molecules. The positive and negative charges of the molecules bind to inorganic nutrient components such as the ammonium ion or sulfate ion as in the case of an ammonium sulfate fertilizer. The outer zones of this matrix with its amphoteric charges can be a binding mechanism for the bioactive agent such as a microbe, pesticide or plant growth regulator. A layer or coating material is processed to a) form a barrier to rapid dissolution of the granule components including the incorporated bioactive agent, b) to bind up nutrients and micronutrients as needed, and c) to protect the granule as from humidity and handling, and reduce dust formation. The coated fertilizer granules preferable contain substantially none or none of the bioactive agent on granule surfaces. Molecular binding of the bioactive agent to the granule may be to the sulfate or phosphate groups that are exposed in and/or on the surface of granules especially in the outer zone of the core or on the core surface. The bioactive agent binding to the sulfate and phosphate groups can be ionic in nature (see FIG. 2). Similarly, the binding of these agents to the organics or organic matrix can be electrostatic/ionic bonding. When the bioactive agent binds to the amide bond contained in the coating material it is also of an ionic nature.

Release of the bioactive agent from the fertilizer granule can occur in one, two or more phases. A first release phase can be anytime from an immediate release to release over a period of approximately two weeks following application of the fertilizer. Release rates can depend on rate of dissolution of the bound biological agent, which may be in the form of a salt (e.g., ammonium or sulfate salts from granules). Delayed release of the bioactive agent can occur as a bolus over multiple phases or gradually over time. For example, bioactive agents can bind to amphoteric organic molecules in the outer regions of the core fertilizer granules and be slowly released into the soil depending on the amount of moisture in the soil, or when moisture is applied to the soil. Alternatively, the bioactive agents can be applied as a layer and or concentrically-constructed layer on a fertilizer granule such that there are at least two components to the granule including a core with a surrounding layer or a core with one or more concentric outer layers that are distinguishable from the core with respect to nutrient content, density, hardness, solubility, composition, microbial content and or permeability or a combination of these. The outer of these layers are the coating for the fertilizer which can occupy up to the outer approximately 200 μm of the granule structure as seen when the granule is cross-sectioned and observed under a microscope. The bioactive agent can be contained in one or more of these concentric layers or coatings of fertilizer granules (see FIGS. 1A-1D).

Coatings may be amide-based as in amide linked hydrocarbons or may be wax or wax-based and these coatings may be utilized with surfactants to assist with spread ability and bridging of the coating and contained herbicide with the outer components of the granule. Surfactants of virtually any class may be used. One advantage of a surfactant is that surfactants can be employed without regard to their physical properties. However, benefits can be realized when the surfactants chosen are supplied as liquids at ambient temperature. An example of surfactant is N-oleyl 1,3 diamino propane. Herbicides and pesticides are often available/dissolved as solvents in that they are dispersed in slightly polar solvents such as mineral spirits. These absorb into the coating and granule but when the surfactant(s) are utilized these can especially assist in the linking of the active agent to the organics and the organic matrix present in organically-enhanced, inorganic fertilizers.

Coating material of coated fertilizer granules comprise from about 5 to about 30 pounds per ton of the dry mass of the fertilizer granule. Preferably the coating composition represents preferably at least about 8 to about 10 pounds per ton, even more preferably least about 15 to about 20 pounds per ton relative to the total dry weight of the granule.

A particularly advantageous coated fertilizer comprises a fertilizer core coated with a material such as a polymer that binds or contains one or more microorganisms selected for a particular end uses in beneficiating the target plant crop or is used in a bioremediation strategy for improving soil.

In a manufacturing step one or more layers of material, such as polymer, polymer precursors, smaller clay particles, biosolid or other organic material, may be applied to the core particle. A wide variety of materials and methods of their use are suitable for forming a layer. Embodiments of the invention further include adding a chemically durable (polymer or chemical coating) or mechanically durable (colloidal attachment and the like) coating to the core that, variously may incorporate one or more types of bacteria in the coating to add value as a bioremediation material or tool, a pesticide management material or tool or other use where a bacteria with nutrient desirably may be distributed, such as a farm or waste site. In advantageous embodiments, bioactive molecules and or a microorganism in a coating may be combined with a plant micronutrient such as magnesium, boron, manganese, and or zinc; and applied over a granule core.

Coatings applied to a fertilizer granule promote the maintenance of good physical conditions, like the flowability, during storage and handling. Caking is the agglomeration of fertilizer particles by adhesion at their point of contact to form a compact mass that is difficult to break up. Caking has a negative influence on the flowability of a fertilizer, and thus, the coating minimize or eliminate caking upon storage.

The coated fertilizers described herein provide compositions for organic containing fertilizers that can be used for soil remediation, or pasture and/or crop fertilization. Coating of a fertilizer core with one or more outer layers as described herein adds significant value by providing several advantages over uncoated fertilizers. One advantage is that the layered fertilizer physically carries the bioactive agent with the fertilizer, which can reduce the number of applications needed for a particular crop. A second advantage is that the layer or coating can control or limit the release of active molecules from the fertilizer surface and or the structure of the coating itself. A third advantage is that the bioactive molecules can attach to the granules as the coating or to organic molecules, moieties, or matrices of the fertilizer core. The bioactive agents may penetrate the core to a depth of from about 50 to about 1,000 μm, may penetrate the entire granule, or penetrate in different layers that are applied during manufacturing. Preferably the bioactive agents penetrate to within about 50 μm of the granule surface, within about 100 μm of the granule surface, within about 200 μm of the granule surface, within about 300 μm of the granule surface, within about 400 μm of the granule surface, or within about 500 μm of the granule surface. The depth of penetration can be used to provide controlled release of the bioactive agent, such as delaying release for about 2 to about 15 weeks, preferably from about 3 to about 12 weeks, and more preferably from about 3 to about 8 weeks. This release of the bioactive agent is an advantage to the grower in that drift of the bioactive agent on application is eliminated or at least minimized. A fourth advantage is that temperature-sensitive agent s (heat or cold sensitive) may be added to the coating or outer regions of the granule after the fertilizer core has been formed in manufacture thereby protecting the agents from the high or low temperatures (e.g., greater than about 150° C. (302° F.) or less than about 0° C. (32° F.)) that may exist in the area or during manufacture or shipping. A fifth advantage is that the bioactive agent within the coating is protected from photo-degradation. A sixth advantage is that additional application trips across the crop fields are eliminated thereby saving cost and energy. A seventh advantage is that exposure to the active agent that may be harmful to animals or persons, is limited during application by the coating. An eighth advantage is that insertion of bioactive agent directly with the fertilizer granule provides additional enhancement of the target crop dependent on the beneficiating property of the inserted agents, such as microorganisms. For example, microbes will be benefited by being carried on organically enhanced inorganic (sulfur or phosphate based) granule cores as opposed to being on traditional inorganic cores with no microbial nutrients.

Coated fertilizers as described herein can provide nutrient and/or microbial control to meet crop needs effectively and economically, thereby increasing yields and fertilizer costs (as in multiple applications) as to increase profits for the farmer. The amount of coating to be applied to the fertilizer core structure ranges from about 5 pounds per ton to about 100 pounds per ton of fertilizer, preferably from about 15 pounds to about 75 pounds per ton, preferably from about 25 pounds to about 50 pounds per ton, and preferably from about 15 pounds to about 40 pounds per ton. Previously heated or sterilized fertilizer particles may be subsequently coated with coatings that contain viable organisms. Such viable organisms can be in a dormant form or may be physically viably preserved as with freeze dried technologies.

Coated fertilizer granules may have one, two, three or more concentric layers and a central core. The core preferably contains organics that are bound to inorganics as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,992,654 (e.g., ammonium sulfate molecules bound to organics obtained from municipal wastes such as biosolids, digested or undigested food wastes and or digested or undigested animal manures). Similarly, the fertilizer can be ammonium phosphate based as in diammonium phosphate or monoammonium phosphate with the organics similarly bound with the ammonium or phosphate charged molecules.

A coated fertilizer may contain microorganisms in an outer zone of the granule core in in one or more concentric layers applied to a core. Microorganisms that can be included in the coating include bacteria, algae, yeast, fungi, and/or combinations thereof (e.g. such as mixtures of microorganisms present in and isolated from natural flora, soil, water and within or on other organisms and genetically engineered microorganisms). Preferably, the microorganisms incorporated metabolize toxic chemicals or compounds, replenish depleted soil microflora, and/or enhance the transfer of nutrients to a target crop. Examples of microorganisms that can be incorporated include, but are not limited to Pseudomonas stutzeri strain KC, Nocardia salmonicolor, Nocardia globerula, Nocardia paraffinae, Nocardia poaca, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas oleovorans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluoroscens, Mycobacterium phlei, Mycobac-terium lacticola, Mycobacterium paraffinicum, Aerobacter aerogenes, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lichiniformis, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus polymyxa, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus macerans, Bacillus azotofixans, Sacharomyces cereviseae, Bacterium acidipropionci, Bacterium aliphaticium liquifaciens, Arthrobacter paraffinens, Rhodococcus rhodochrous, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Clostridium cellulolytican, Clostridium aerotolerans, Clostridium acetobutylican, Clostridium pasturianum, the various Azotobacter sp., Bacillis sp., Clostridium sp., Fusarium sp., Candida sp., Flavobacterium sp., Corynebacterium sp., Achromobacter sp. Acinetobacter sp., Rhodococcus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Mycobacterium, Nocardia sp., Rhodot-orula sp., filamentous fungi such as Penicillium sp. and Phycomyces sp., and Apergillus sp., Streptomyces griseus, among others. Genetically engineered microorganisms are preferably engineered to produce enhancement of the target crop growth and fruit production or to improve the ability of the microorganism to metabolize toxic chemicals and compounds present in the soil to which the fertilizer is applied.

The coatings of coated fertilizer granules may contain micronutrients beneficial to the viability and physiological activity microorganisms, especially when reactivated upon application to soils. Micronutrients and/or the microorganisms may be in one or more of the outer zones of the granules, and/or in one or more layers around the core granule. Preferably granules containing microorganisms are coated in a manufacturing step subsequent to heating to avoid thermal destruction of the microorganisms. In such granules, release of microorganism may be preferably stimulated under predetermined environmental conditions which would activate or dissolve the outer protective layer of the granule. The microorganisms upon their release, are then able to utilize growth-stimulating nutrients derived from other components of the organically-enhanced granule.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to method of contacting bioactive agents to fertilizers. Preferably the fertilizer contains organic material and is initially prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,947,104; 8,557,013 or 8,992,654. During or after the granulation process, the bioactive agent is contacted with the fertilizer forming coated granules. The bioactive agent may be combined with an agent that adheres to the fertilizer granules forming a coating. Contacting may be performed by spray the bioactive agent as a liquid onto the surfaces of granules, or by immersing the granules in a fluid. Additional coatings can be applied contained the same or different bioactive agents or combinations of agents. Preferably the final coating produces a smooth surface on the granules. The now coated fertilizer granules are dried to the desired level of dryness and sized for sorting and eventual shipping. Because the granules are coated, exposure to harmful chemicals and other substances within the granules is reduced or eliminated.

In conventional coating processes, the inclusion and ionic reactions between the added substance and the coating molecules is carried out prior to the application of the coating to the fertilizer granule. In a preferred method of coating, materials such as, for example, amide linked hydrocarbons or waxes (e.g., paraffin) are solids at ambient temperatures. The interactive reactions between the bioactive agent and the coating material take place at temperatures of between about 49° C. (120° F.) and 66° C. (150° F.) over a period of at least one hour, more preferably at least 12 hours, even more preferably at least 24 hours. There is no required upper limit as the bioactive agent may be stored with the coating for several months prior to its actually being applied to the fertilizer core.

Methods for applying the coated fertilizer granules include in-situ remediation which provides a low-cost treatment for environments contaminated with hazardous wastes. Environments that can be treated include contaminated areas of land (e.g. landfills, contaminated fields, pastures) and areas that have undesired hydrocarbon contaminants. The utilization of fertilizers containing microorganisms that can digest unwanted contaminants provide a means of treating hazardous materials without the need for extraction or evacuation of contaminated materials. In addition, bioremediation, both biostimulation and bioaugmentation, requires periodic or continuous introduction of nutrients or buffers to sustain active populations of bacteria, capable of degrading hazardous wastes in situ. For treatment of many sites, delivery of nutrients or other environmental modifiers may be needed over sustained periods of time. The coated fertilizer granules described herein provide an inexpensive means of delivering micronutrients (e.g. controlled levels of nutrients to maintain active microorganism populations), microorganisms, or chemical reactants to effect degradation over extended periods of time. This is accomplished by delivering a solid phase fertilizer granule capable of delivering via dissolution the nutrients, microbial environmental modifiers and/or reactants capable of biologically remediating an environment contaminated with hazardous materials. In addition, coating slow-release or delayed release fertilizer granules allow additional control of nutrient release in a growth season.

The following examples illustrate embodiments of the invention but should not be viewed as limiting the scope of the invention.

For an amide-based coating, the material is an amide composed of a fatty acid esterified to a C18 stearyl amine. The fatty acid may be of different carbon lengths, optimally at C12 or C14 carbons, but more preferably at C16 or C18 carbons. This amide is solid at ambient temperatures below 52° C. (125° F.). In an embodiment using this amide compound, the coating will permit some binding of the amide with the active group on the bioactive molecule. The primary binding occurs between the bioactive molecule and the sulfate components both on the surface of and within the outer 100 μm of the granule. The bioactive substance (e.g., herbicide and/or pesticide) also binds with organics or matrix containing negative charges that are in the granule core as the herbicide or pesticide migrates from the coating into the granule surface and core structure. The bioactive molecule also binds with iron and aluminum molecules that are also on the granule surface and core structure.

Coatings may comprise an oil or a paraffin wax with a melting point of 49° C. (120° F.) to 63° C. (145° F.) and preferably between 52° C. (125° F.) and 57° C. (135° F.). The wax coating is used to contain and apply the bioactive molecule to the fertilizer granule core. The wax is a solid at ambient temperatures and at temperatures below 54° C. (130° F.). To facilitate the distribution and adherence of the bioactive substance to the coating molecules a surfactant is mixed with the molten wax prior to application to the granular fertilizer. The surfactant is N-oleyl 1-1,3, diamino propane and the hydrocarbon end interacts with the wax and permits a binding with an herbicide or pesticide. The diamine surfactant can serve as a bridge between the carboxylic acid and the granule surface, anchoring the herbicide to the granule surface until the fertilizer is dissolved and the herbicide releases to the soil.

The procedure for the addition of the bioactive substance to the coating is to warm the coating formulation of wax and surfactant to a temperature of 60° C. (140° F.) and add the correct amount of warmed herbicide to this warm liquid coating. Preferably the mixing container is heated and insulated to prevent solidification of the coating either during addition of the bioactive agent and or during storage prior to transport or use. The amount of bioactive agent to be added to the coating varies as to the recommendations for the specific herbicide to be applied. As the coating is applied between 2# and 30# per ton of the dry mass of the fertilizer it should contain sufficient herbicide, pesticide, plant growth agent, or microbe such that agronomic application rates of the fertilizer will yield sufficient herbicide or pesticide into the treated soil to inhibit or kill the unwanted vegetation or allow effective action. Bioactive substances such as an herbicide (e.g., Atrazine) may be added in a separate coating step, as in a spray, to be applied prior to the final coat of amide or wax such that the herbicide would then reside in the outer approximate 100 μm of the granule structure underneath either the outer coating.

As disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,992,654 and 9,856,178, some of the herbicide or pesticide directly bind with the sulfate groups on the surface of the granule as the fertilizer is an organically enhanced ammonium sulfate. On application of the fertilizer to the soil of the target crop as per agronomic rates the herbicide or pesticide will be slowly released on dissolution of the granular fertilizer as a salt, e.g., a sulfate salt, and be available in the soil to inhibit unwanted vegetation, e.g., weeds or pests. Similarly, release of contained microbes will occur on dissolution of the granular fertilizer components.

Average application amounts for the referenced fertilizers of this invention, as, for example, set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,992,654, and 9,856,178, are 1 to 2 pounds of nitrogen content per 100 square feet of turf, and on average, 150 to 400 pounds of product per acre for row crops such as corn, cotton, rice and wheat. When the fertilizer containing the bioactive molecules are applied to the target crops the herbicide or pesticide is released as a free molecule leaving a salt (e.g., calcium salt or bicarbonate) as a precipitate on the fertilizer granule surface. This release mechanism is very advantageous in the control of unwanted vegetation in that the release occurs in two phases following the release of nutrients (e.g, nitrogen) from the granule. The majority of the bioactive molecule will be released within the first two weeks following application of the fertilizer (see FIG. 6) with the remainder being slowly released over the next three to twelve weeks and more preferably being released slowly over the period of three weeks to 8 weeks.

Wet community waste organics comprised of digested food waste and manures (also referred to as biosolids) are received at a fertilizer manufacturing facility with a percent solids of about 17.0 percent. The plant is set up to operate at an organics processing rate of 220 wet tons per day. In this example, the material is mixed with previously dried organic materials to yield a preferred percent solids of about 20% to 26%, or more preferably about 22% to 24% solids. This conditioned organic mix is pumped into the first vessel for hydrolysis. At the orifice of the first vessel, the conditioned organic mix is further mixed with 93% sulfuric acid in an amount pre-calculated to yield a degree of heat of hydration of about 110° C. (230° F.) and a total of about 17% sulfur in the finished fertilizer. The contents of the vessel are mixed vigorously at a rate of 360 RPM for between about 30 seconds and ten minutes or, preferably for between about two minutes and six minutes. Within the vessel, the acidified mix gradually is forced to the upper quarter of the vessel where it is discharged after the reaction. In this first vessel, proteins from the organics are hydrolyzed to various length of polypeptides or, preferably, to monomeric amino acids. Other macro-organic compounds that are present are also hydrolyzed to smaller molecular forms. Hydrolysis increases the fluidity of the contents of the vessel, preferably to less than 1000 cP. This now fluidized, acidified mix is then transferred under pressure to the bottom orifice of a second pressure vessel for ammoniation, wherein it is mixed with vaporized anhydrous ammonia sufficient to raise the temperature of the mix to over 150° F. (65° C.) (or alternatively over 300° F. (149° C.)). The internal pressure of the second vessel can equal or exceed 35 psi and is sufficient to cause the concentration of nitrogen (N) in the final formulation of the resultant fertilizer to between about 16% to 17% nitrogen by dry weight of the finished product. The ammoniated mix is maintained in the second pressure vessel for six minutes of reaction time before it is discharged through an orifice to the granulator. The discharged mix (also referred to as a melt) is slightly increased in viscosity compared to the discharge of the first pressure vessel, but preferably has a viscosity of less than about 1200 cP. This discharged melt is under pressure and therefore enters the granulator to be sprayed onto a receiving bed of recycled fertilizer granules (e.g., crushed fertilizer material or undersized fertilizer material or fertilizer dust material collected from the various dust collectors contained in the process air treatment system). The spray coats the receiving fertilizer granules and gradually builds up a series of coatings or agglomerated material, such that the granular fertilizer is produced in which the majority of the material is of the desired product size. Desired sizes may be, for example, about 1.7 mm to 3.5 mm (170 sgn to 350 sgn; “size guide number”) diameter granules, suitable for use in commercial agriculture. Subsequent or simultaneously with application of the sprayed coating, an amount of a hardener is applied to the granules in the granulator. Preferably, the hardener amount is sufficient for the hardness of the finished granules to reach a range of about 5 lbs. to 8 lbs. crush strength. This material is then dried to about 98% or more solids, for example in a rotary drum dryer, and then screened to one of three commercial sizes of about 1.7 mm to 1.9 mm, about 1.2 mm to 1.4 mm, and to about 2.6 mm to 3.5 mm. Smaller material is returned to the granulator as part of the recycle bed. All larger material is crushed in a chain mill and also returned to the granulator as part of the recycle bed. A portion of the proper sized product, preferably about 2.4 mm to 3.0 mm for commercial product size, may also be returned to the recycle bed to maintain the mass balance of the production process. The steps of this process were performed under negative pressure to minimize dust and to prevent odors being released into the manufacturing environment. Process air was treated through a robust odor control system such that no noxious odors were perceived at the fence line of the manufacturing property. Scrubbed nutrients such as ammonium ion, in this example—ammonium sulfate, were returned to a process water tank wherein it was added to the first mixer to help control the solids content and the fluidity of the conditioned mix entering the first pressure vessel. This maximizes the efficiency of the manufacturing process so that the only discharges from the fertilizer manufacturing process are treated condensed water (from the municipal organic material and any cooling water that may need to be discharged from the cooling system) along with the treated process air. In the fertilizer manufactured in this example the slow release percentage of nitrogen was about 30% of the total nitrogen in the product. This slow release nitrogen is in the form of an organic matrix in which the positive charged ammonium ion is electrostatically bound to a negative charge on the organic compounds such as polypeptides and amino acids that comprise the core of the matrix. After exiting the rotary dryer, the product is passed through a product cooler to reduce the temperature of the product to between about 115° F. (46° C.) and 160° F. (71° C.), and more preferably between about 130° F. (54° C.) and 150° F. (65° C.). This cooled product is coated with 5 to 10 pounds per ton of an amide hydrocarbon coating initially at an average granule temperature of 135° F. (57° C.) with the coating temperature set to 160° F. (71° C.). The product then is transported to the warehouse pending shipment. When shipping is scheduled the product is coated a second time with an additional 10 to 20 pounds per ton product. The herbicide will be contained in this coating or may be applied as a spray prior to the application of the final coat layer as in a shipping coat. In this example Atrazine is used (see FIGS. 3, 4 and 5). Atrazine is a herbicide of the triazine class. Atrazine is used to prevent pre- and post-emergence broadleaf weeds in crops such as maize (corn) and sugarcane and on turf, such as golf courses and residential lawns. It is one of the most widely used herbicides in U.S. and Australian agriculture. The Atrazine is added to the amide coating as a lipid soluble blend. Upon being applied to the fertilizer granule the coating with Atrazine solidifies and forms a very dust resistant, handling resistant surface coating. The Atrazine located at the interface with the coating will bind to the exposed bisulfate anions in the outer approximate 100 μm of granule structure (see FIGS. 1 and 3). The Atrazine that is carried in the body of the solidified amide coating will slowly migrate and find additional bisulfate molecules to bind to. The Atrazine is contained in the organically enhanced ammonium sulfate fertilizer such that the dry mass of the herbicide is between 0.25% and 0.75% of the mass of the product. This means that between 5# to 15# of herbicide needs to be included in a ton of the molten coating prior to application to the granules. This quantity may require a separate embodiment in which the Atrazine or other herbicide to be added in a separate coating step to be applied prior to the final coat of amide or wax such that the herbicide would then reside in the outer approximate 100 μm of the granule structure underneath either the outer amide coating or the wax coating.

The result is a smooth coated granular fertilizer with enhanced protection against dusting and handling in warehouse storage and for transport and handling by the intermediate fertilizer distributor and finally by the end-user—the grower farmer. The product of this example contained a 98% dry granular fertilizer with a nutrient formulation of 16-1-0-20-1-16 (N—P—K—S—Fe-Organic) by dry weight of the finished granules containing sufficient Atrazine (0.5% to 1.5% w/w) to inhibit unwanted vegetation.

In granules formed as in Examples 1 and 2, a coating is applied containing the herbicide 2,4-D, is applied as lipid soluble herbicide in a refined paraffin wax that has a melting point of about 131° F. (55° C.). Again between 5 and 30 pounds of coating per ton of product are used. The 2,4-D again binds to the sulfur and organic molecules on the surface of the granule and in the outer 100 μm of the granule. This binding increases over time as the 2,4-D in the solidified wax coating migrates to the surface of the granule and finds more sulfate to ionically bind to. The concentration of the 2,4-D in the finished fertilizer is usually between 0.05% and 0.5% as based on agronomist recommendations.

In fertilizer granules formed as in Examples 1 and 2, a refined wax coating containing a surfactant is applied at 25# per ton and which coating containing a herbicide from the sulfonylurea class. This is an effective herbicide class that kills broadleaf weeds and some annual grasses. One of its active forms is sold as Metsulfuron-methyl, which is a systemic compound with foliar and soil activity that inhibits cell division in shoots and roots that has excellent compatibility with a paraffin wax coating with its aromatic rings and binds well to the sulfate and organic molecules in the outer 100 μm of the fertilizer at a fertilizer pH of between 4.5 and 6.0. This binding enhances the stability of the herbicide becoming an advantage over other methods of application.

In fertilizer granules made similarly to the method of Example 1 however, with the difference that a diammonium phosphate-based fertilizer was manufactured. This fertilizer was coated with 25 pounds of a refined paraffin wax. The nutrient formulation of this fertilizer is 16-34-0-7-1-12 (N—P—K—S—Fe-Organic by dry weight). A dinitroaniline class herbicide was added to the hydrocarbon amide coating. This herbicide has an excellent compatibility to the wax coating because of its lipophilic nature and binds well to the phosphate and organic components, especially the organic matrix in this fertilizer, in the outer range of the granule core and surface area. The tight organic binding exhibited by the nitroaniline contributes to the slow release of this herbicide in the field thereby extending weed control.

In fertilizer granules made similarly to the method of Examples 1 and 2, with the difference that a diammonium phosphate-based fertilizer core was manufactured. The nutrient formulation of this fertilizer is 14-24-0-10-1-10 (N—P—K—S—Fe-Organic by dry weight). The first coating on the manufactured fertilizer core is a light-weight mineral oil-based coating which contains a suspension of freeze-dried Acinetobacter calcoaceticus applied to the granule cores are a rate of 12 pounds coating per ton of core. After drying, this core plus first coating is then further coated with a protective layer of 20 pounds per ton of a warmed paraffin wax or 20 pounds of a warmed oil-based amide coating, both of which are solids at about 75° F. (24° C.).

In fertilizer granules made similarly to the method of Examples 1 and 2, with the difference that a diammonium phosphate-based fertilizer core was manufactured. The nutrient formulation of this fertilizer is 14-24-0-10-1-12 (N—P—K—S—Fe-Organic by dry weight). The first coating on the manufactured fertilizer core is a modified tall oil-based coating which contains an amide linkage in the middle of a long hydrocarbon chain to assist in binding to the outer zone region of the granule core. This first coating is applied to the hot (about 130° F. to about 160° F.; or about 55° C. to about 71° C.) granule cores during manufacture at rate of 10 pounds coating per ton of core. After drying, this core plus first coating is then further coated, often at the time of shipping, with a protective layer of 22 pounds per ton of a similar tall oil coating containing 3% active Imidacloprid 2F by mass of coating. This is a good active agent for fertilizers that contain organics in their structure as Imidacloprid binds to organics making it possible for insecticide to be released slowly over time after application. Imidacloprid works well at a per acre application of 0.1 pounds per acre of active compound. If the fertilizer of this example is applied at a typical application of 300 pounds per acre then each acre would be treated with 0.1 pound of active Imidacloprid 2F. This concentration would fit well in a 3 times a year application protocol as regulations limit the maximum amount of Imidaclosprid 2F to less than 0.4 pounds of active compound per acre. This is a particularly useful inclusion as imidacloprid is a systemic insecticide that acts as an insect neurotoxin and belongs to a class of chemicals called the neonicotinoids. Imidacloprid is widely used for pest control in agriculture.

Fertilizer granules are prepared basically as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,992,654, wherein liquid fertilizer is sprayed onto recycled fertilizer materials creating granules. The spray also contains an amount of a herbicide which together coat the fertilizer granules. A second liquid is introduced to the fertilizer granules through the same or a different nozzle, again via spraying, containing plant nutrients plus an amount of a hardener. Preferably, the hardener amount is sufficient for the hardness of the finished granules to reach a range of about 5 lbs. to 8 lbs. crush strength. This material is then dried to about 98% or more solids in a rotary drum dryer. The resulting fertilizer product is a smooth coated granular fertilizer with enhanced protection against dusting and handling in warehouse storage and for transport and handling by the intermediate fertilizer distributor and finally by the end-user, the grower farmer. The product contains multiple coating layers with sufficient Atrazine (0.5% to 1.5% w/w) to inhibit unwanted vegetation, and sufficient nutrients to promote plant growth and development.

Other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. All references cited herein, including all publications, U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications, and specifically the reference Ullmann Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2002), are specifically and entirely incorporated by reference. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered exemplary only with the true scope and spirit of the invention indicated by the following claims. Furthermore, the term “comprising of” includes the terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of.”

Burnham, Jeffrey C., Siegel, Sanford A.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
10487016, Aug 12 2015 The Mosaic Company Acid treatment for fertilizers to increase zinc solubility and availability
143310,
2026969,
2568901,
2662881,
2755176,
2800457,
2800458,
2864685,
2902342,
3050383,
3259482,
3264088,
3264089,
3304588,
3306730,
3336128,
3345288,
3475154,
3476683,
3655395,
3756784,
3796669,
3837872,
3915853,
3939280, Aug 30 1974 General Environmental Systems Co., Inc. Process for treating animal waste
3942970, Nov 08 1971 NU-GRO CORPORATION Process for treating sewage sludge and fertilizer products thereof
3960718, Aug 05 1974 Method and apparatus for treating liquid sewage and waste
3966450, Aug 12 1974 FMC Corporation Animal waste odor treatment
4001140, Jul 10 1974 WTA INC Capsule manufacture
4076515, Jul 09 1975 Method for treatment of digester supernatant and other streams in wastewater treatment facilities
4079003, Oct 15 1973 Method of transforming sludge into ecologically acceptable solid material
4100103, Dec 30 1976 WTA INC Capsule manufacture
4108771, Feb 06 1974 Weiss & Co.; Kemiska Konsultbyran A.G.; Chemical Consults Corp., Ltd. Elimination of odors from organic wastes
4124405, Aug 06 1975 PEC-Engineering Societe Anonyme Process for solidifying aqueous wastes and products thereof
4134750, Jul 25 1977 Tennessee Valley Authority Granular ammonium phosphate sulfate and urea-ammonium phosphate sulfate using a common pipe-cross reactor
4154593, Aug 27 1976 Mississippi Chemical Corporation Process for granulating ammonium phosphate containing fertilizers
4180459, Dec 16 1977 Industrial Filter & Pump Mfg. Co. Process of making agricultural product from organic sewage sludge
4219347, Jun 09 1977 Union Oil Company of California Multicomponent soil supplement
4230568, Oct 19 1977 STABLEX U S A , INC , WILMINGTON, DE , A CORP OF DE Treatment of hazardous waste
4249929, Oct 25 1972 Method of digesting organic wastes
4270279, Nov 22 1978 HANNS ROEDIGER Method for drying and sterilizing sewage sludge
4304588, May 05 1980 Arcadian Corporation; FERTILIZER INDUSTRIES INC Foliar feed compositions
4306978, Jul 14 1980 Willow Technology, Inc. Method for lime stabilization of wastewater treatment plant sludges
4377406, Jul 20 1981 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, A CORP OF UNITED STATES Ammonium polyphosphate sulfate fertilizers from wet-process phosphoric acid
4377486, Dec 24 1980 WRC PROCESSING COMPANY, A CORP OF VA Organic sludge dewatering process
4405354, Apr 02 1980 UNISCOPE, INC , A CORP OF CO Elimination of odors from waste material
4454259, May 21 1979 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Process for the preparation of polyaddition products of isocyanates and denatured biomasses, their use as reactive fillers and as plant nutrients and a process for the production of sheets or shaped articles using the polyaddition products
4500428, Sep 30 1982 Process Research Development & Management, Inc. Method for the treatment of wastewater sludge
4514307, Jul 26 1983 Conversion Systems, Inc. Method of stabilizing organic waste
4519831, Oct 17 1983 Arcadian Corporation; FERTILIZER INDUSTRIES INC Method of converting sewage sludge to fertilizer
4541986, Dec 23 1977 Degussa Aktiengesellschaft Process for deodorizing sludge
4554002, May 16 1983 N-Viro International Corporation Beneficiating waste sludges for agricultural use and product made thereby
4601863, Feb 09 1984 NEW OJI PAPER CO , LTD Process for producing powder of microcapsules
4619684, Oct 03 1983 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, A CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER AND BY VIRTUE OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS Pressure reactor for producing diammonium phosphate
4655932, Feb 10 1986 Method and apparatus for the disintegration and destruction of hazardous and toxic sludge materials
4659472, Jan 04 1984 Purac AB Method for producing a compostable mixture of sludge from sewage purification plants
4711659, Aug 18 1986 AGRIUM POLYMER COATINGS CORP Attrition resistant controlled release fertilizers
4743287, Sep 29 1982 Fertilizer and method
4772490, Dec 16 1985 Ashland Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC Method for producing a water-permeable covering on granular water-soluble substances
4781842, Feb 27 1987 N-Viro International Corporation Method of treating wastewater sludge
4786307, Mar 23 1987 Actagro, LLC Chelated plant nutrients
4792349, Nov 03 1987 Tennessee Valley Authority Fertilizer values from galvanizer waste
4793927, Jan 27 1987 Tulane Medical Center of Tulane Univ.; Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Method of treating sewage
4857458, Dec 05 1985 Propiorga Installation and plant for the recovery of energy from waste and residues
4902431, Jan 28 1988 N-Viro International Corporation Method for treating wastewater sludge
4966706, Aug 05 1987 Peroxid-Chemie GmbH Process for treatment of clarification sludge
4997572, Jun 29 1990 Willow Technology, Inc. High rate method for alkaline stabilization, beneficiating and pelletizing of wastewater treatment plant sludges
5013458, Apr 06 1990 RDP Company Process and apparatus for pathogen reduction in waste
5051031, Oct 20 1986 American Fly Ash Company Method of treating municipal sewage sludge and product produced thereby
5087375, Oct 21 1987 AGGLO RECOVERY, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF ONTARIO Method for producing insoluble industrial raw material from waste
5102556, Mar 30 1990 Union Oil Company of California; Union Oil Company of California, dba UNOCAL Method for rendering ferric hydroxide sludges recyclable
5118337, Mar 16 1990 MEMON B V Method for preparing granular fertilizer from manure
5125951, Feb 13 1989 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Process for producing a dried fertilizer from sewage sludge
5135664, Nov 30 1990 N-Viro International Corporation Method for treating wastewater sludge
5147563, Sep 01 1989 LONG ENTERPRISES, INC Sewage sludge treatment with gas injection
5183577, Jan 06 1992 Zimpro Passavant Environmental Systems, Inc. Process for treatment of wastewater containing inorganic ammonium salts
5238480, Jun 29 1989 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Fertilizer compositions and method of making such compositions
5252116, Sep 03 1991 TRG International Waste Management, Ltd. Organic base fertilizer from municipal sewage sludge
5259977, Mar 20 1992 Bio Gro Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for the treatment of sewage sludge and the like
5275733, Nov 30 1990 Medical College of Ohio Process to stabilize wastewater sludge
5340376, Jun 08 1990 OMS INVESTMENTS, INC Controlled-release microbe nutrients and method for bioremediation
5342442, Jan 11 1991 MINERGY CORPORATION LIMITED Lightweight aggregate from flyash and sewage sludge
5346527, Jan 22 1991 L & G Rehbein, Inc.; L & G REHBEIN, INC Soil treatment
5356540, May 20 1991 Texaco Inc. Pumpable aqueous slurries of sewage sludge
5385673, Sep 08 1992 Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. Method of treating wastewater biosolids
5393317, Nov 06 1989 Reland Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing organic based fertilizer in continuous process
5401402, Aug 26 1991 RDP Company Process and apparatus for treating sewage sludge
5409605, Aug 05 1993 LHOIST NORTH AMERICA, INC Apparatus and method for treating waste sludge
5417861, Nov 30 1990 Medical College of Ohio Process to stabilize bioorganic, raw or treated wastewater sludge
5419839, Aug 05 1993 LHOIST NORTH AMERICA, INC Apparatus and method for treating waste sludge
5422015, Jul 30 1992 FLEET TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC Pathogenic waste treatment
5435923, Mar 20 1992 Bio Gro Systems, Inc. Method for the treatment of sewage sludge and the like
5443613, Nov 06 1989 Method for producing suspension fertilizer
5466273, Apr 28 1994 GREEN TRIANGLE CORPORATION Method of treating organic material
5500044, Oct 15 1993 Greengrove Corporation Process for forming aggregate; and product
5554279, Sep 26 1994 RDP Company Apparatus for treatment of sewage sludge
5556445, Apr 08 1991 Mark K., Quinn Steam treatment of municipal solid waste
5580458, Jul 31 1992 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Method for waste water treatment using calcium carbonate mineral and microorganisms in combination
5593590, Feb 27 1991 Technoagrar Consulting AG Process for separate treatment and disposal of mixtures of solid and liquid, organic wastes
5593591, Jun 07 1995 BRITEWATER INTERNATIONAL, INC Production of dry, free flowing solids from bio-waste sludge
5603842, Apr 18 1995 Amsco, Incorporated Process for treatment of sludge
5618442, Sep 26 1994 RDP Company Process for treatment of sewage sludge
5635069, Jul 22 1994 Process for treating a waste sludge of biological solids
5669969, Oct 15 1993 Greengrove Corporation Process for forming aggregate; and product
5679129, Dec 15 1993 Clemson University Encapsulated fertilizers and pesticides and process
5681481, May 18 1995 RDP Company Process and apparatus for liquid sludge stabilization
5722721, Nov 22 1996 Pole advertising seat
5733355, Sep 29 1994 Susumu, Hibino; Nagase Biochemicasl, Ltd.; Risahru Kosan Ltd. Bacterial Preparation for agricultural use
5766302, May 07 1993 NEW ENGLAND, UNIVERSITY OF Fertilizer coating process
5783073, May 18 1995 RDP Company Process and apparatus for liquid sludge stabilization
5803946, Jun 20 1996 AGRIUM INC Controlled release plant nutrients
5807724, Aug 07 1989 RESNICK, KATHY YVONNE COUCH ; RESNICK, ADRIENNE I ; RESNICK, NICOLE YVONNE Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons with organisms encapsulated in wax
5849060, Aug 17 1995 Zhengzhou Centre of Popularization & Research on Zhengzhou Luxuriance Controlled release fertilizer and preparations thereof
5853450, Sep 22 1995 Medical College of Ohio Method for treating bioorganic and wastewater sludges
5853590, Aug 30 1995 Medical College of Ohio Method for treating bioorganic and wastewater sludges
5862610, Dec 28 1995 Atara Corporation Method for coating dry pellets made of waste bio-solids with waste bio-solids
5876613, Mar 31 1995 OTV SA Sludge digestion method
5906750, Sep 26 1996 CLEARVALUE TECHNOLOGIES, INC Method for dewatering of sludge
5916448, Aug 23 1996 HAZEN & SAWYER, P C Chemical conditioning of liquid and semi-liquid sludge for dewatering, odor control, pathogen control, nutrient enhancement of the residual, and handling characteristics
5984992, May 07 1997 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Sewage sludge recycling with a pipe cross-reactor
5993505, May 22 1998 EVERRIS INTERNATIONAL B V Controlled release fertilizer compositions and processes for the preparation thereof
6051411, Sep 19 1997 National Research Council of Canada; CANADA, NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF Microorganisms immobilized in chitosan crosslinked with lignosulphonate for purification of waste water
6080221, Sep 17 1999 B & B INTERNATIONAL, LLC; B&B INTERNATIONAL, LLC Vacuum coated particulate fertilizers
6103191, Jan 29 1997 Riverside County Eastern Municipal Water District Continuous flow pasteurization of sewage sludge
6117406, Nov 18 1996 Kaltenbach-Thuring S.A. Process for manufacturing ammonium salts
6159263, May 07 1997 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Sewage sludge recycling with a pipe cross-reactor
6165550, Jul 23 1998 Covestro LLC Symmetrical Polyurea-urethane fertilizer encapsulation
6176891, Mar 26 1997 Central Glass Company, Limited; CENTRAL CLASS COMPANY, LIMITED Coated granular fertilizer and method for producing same
6187074, Jun 13 1995 K + S Aktiengesellschaft Coated fertilizer granules
6237246, Jan 02 1997 BIOPHAST TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Treating sewage or like sludge
6237264, Apr 27 1995 Eastman Kodak Company Device and method for producing lenticular images with motion
6256902, Nov 03 1998 MCCARTHY, EDWARD A; JOHNSON, BRUCE Apparatus and method for desiccating and deagglomerating wet, particulate materials
6284278, Jun 13 1997 Contrix Ltd. Controlled release chemicals
6325035, Sep 30 1999 Caterpillar Inc. Method and apparatus for starting an engine using capacitor supplied voltage
6331300, Apr 21 1997 Board of Trustees Operating Michigan State University Compositions for providing a chemical to a microorganism
6387145, Jul 02 1998 AGROQUALITA S R L Fine granulated fertilizer formulation for seed/plant placement at seeding or transplanting
6398840, Jun 08 2000 Process for treating sludge
6406510, Dec 09 1999 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Methods for treating wastewater sludge
6409788, Jan 23 1998 CRYTAL PEAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Methods for producing fertilizers and feed supplements from agricultural and industrial wastes
6409789, Feb 07 2000 NWA LICENSING, LLC Organic biosolid waste treatment process for resource transformation, regeneration, and utilization
6416983, Mar 01 2001 Ultra Biotech Limited Biological fertilizer compositions comprising garbage
6461399, Dec 10 1999 GREEN TRIANGLE CORPORATION Organic material based uniprill fertilizer
6465706, Jun 30 1999 Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC Encapsulation method for maintaining biodecontamination activity
6517599, Feb 07 2000 NWA LICENSING, LLC Organic biosolid waste treatment process for resource transformation, regeneration, and utilization
6623650, Oct 18 2000 BIOPHAST TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Processes and apparatus for treating sewage or like sludge
6666154, Apr 12 2002 N-Viro International Corporation Methods for controlling ignitability of organic waste with mineral by-products
6716360, Apr 16 2002 Eau-Viron Incorporated Method and apparatus for treating waste streams
6752848, Aug 08 2001 N-Viro International Corporation Method for disinfecting and stabilizing organic wastes with mineral by-products
6752849, Aug 08 2001 N-Viro International Corporation Method for disinfecting and stabilizing organic wastes with mineral by-products
6758879, May 07 1997 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Sewage sludge recycling with a pipe cross-reactor
6828132, Mar 01 2001 Ultra Biotech Limited Biological fertilizer compositions comprising garbage
6841515, Jan 22 2001 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Production and use of biosolid granules
6852142, Jun 01 2000 GREEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC Organic-based fertilizer
6966941, Sep 09 1997 BER Systems, Inc. Sewage sludge treatment
7128880, Dec 19 2002 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Organic recycling with a pipe-cross or tubular reactor
7497956, Nov 29 2001 TREMBLAY, RICHARD Method for stabilizing and conditioning urban and industrial wastewater sludge
7513927, Dec 19 2003 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Methods of controlling chemical self-heating of organic-containing materials
7604742, Apr 26 2002 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Soil conditioning products from organic waste
7662205, Mar 09 2005 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Processes to beneficiate heat-dried biosolid pellets
7789931, May 27 2003 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Organic recycling with metal addition
7947104, Feb 16 2007 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Process for treating sludge and manufacturing bioorganically-augmented high nitrogen-containing inorganic fertilizer
7947105, Sep 15 2005 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Organic fertilizer made by alkaline conversion process
8057569, May 27 2003 UNITY FERTILIZER LLC Organic recycling with metal addition
8105413, Feb 23 2005 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Manufacturing of bioorganic-augmented high nitrogen-containing inorganic fertilizer
8202342, Sep 15 2005 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process
8242053, Aug 27 2007 PROBELTE, S A Biological fertilizer, method for obtaining same and use thereof as a plant growth stimulator
8470065, Jan 13 2012 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Manufacturing of bioorganic-augmented high nitrogen-containing inorganic fertilizer
8557013, Dec 30 2009 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Bioorganically-augmented high value fertilizer
8597394, Sep 15 2005 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process
8864868, Sep 15 2005 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process
8920733, Dec 30 2009 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Bioorganically-augmented high value fertilizer
8992654, Mar 28 2011 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC High value organic-enhanced inorganic fertilizers
9233882, Sep 15 2005 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process
9328030, Dec 30 2009 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Bioorganically-augmented high value fertilizer
9540291, Feb 10 2015 Land View, Inc.; LAND VIEW, INC Coating for improved granular fertilizer efficiency
9580363, Mar 21 2012 Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory Limited Nitrogen-fixing bacterial inoculant for improvement of crop productivity and reduction of nitrous oxide emission
9586869, Dec 30 2009 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Bioorganically-augmented high value fertilizer
9695092, Feb 16 2007 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC Process for treating sludge and manufacturing bioorganically-augmented high nitrogen-containing inorganic fertilizer
9856178, Jun 05 2015 PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC High value organic containing fertilizers and methods of manufacture
20020098982,
20020157439,
20030070460,
20030089151,
20030121302,
20030136165,
20030157247,
20040016731,
20040031303,
20040065127,
20040120867,
20040177664,
20050005660,
20050019207,
20050022569,
20050039508,
20050077245,
20050138978,
20060243009,
20060254331,
20070062233,
20070257715,
20080000279,
20080034822,
20080230484,
20100025505,
20100139345,
20100139346,
20100255050,
20100288003,
20120247164,
20120272700,
20140090430,
20140137616,
20140323297,
20150027180,
20150135785,
20150191399,
20150210604,
20160137560,
20160200634,
20160229763,
20160244377,
20160297725,
20160355443,
20160355444,
20170066692,
20170066693,
20170232419,
20180179117,
20190194084,
20190300451,
20210101847,
20210300833,
CA2912032,
CN104291899,
CN105777329,
CN106754515,
CN107162645,
CN107285847,
CN108164333,
CN108341712,
CN108752092,
CN108911909,
CN110922249,
CN111848261,
CN111978116,
CN112094149,
CN112125742,
CN1128741,
CN113121284,
CN113233930,
CN1184092,
CN1215040,
DE2523628,
DE2800915,
DE4127459,
EP143392,
EP303632,
EP356781,
EP557078,
EP770586,
EP1363865,
EP3322679,
EP3749627,
FR2133115,
FR2757504,
FR3004448,
JP2001129597,
JP2002248454,
JP2002308689,
JP2003081705,
JP2016505479,
JP58032638,
JP9110570,
KR100399401,
KR101017576,
KR101388907,
RE38238, Feb 27 1987 N-Viro International Corp. Method for treating wastewater sludge
WO1998009398,
WO1096260,
WO136082,
WO136887,
WO168562,
WO169150,
WO3045852,
WO4094320,
WO8101250,
WO1575644,
WO2015075644,
WO2017051058,
WO8102888,
WO9504814,
WO9856735,
WO9947282,
///////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 13 2019PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC(assignment on the face of the patent)
Sep 09 2020ANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS HOLDINGS INC PONTIFAX AGTECH INVESTMENTS: ANUVIA SERIES C BRIDGE, LLCSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0537700885 pdf
Sep 09 2020ANUVIA PLANT CITY LLCPONTIFAX AGTECH INVESTMENTS: ANUVIA SERIES C BRIDGE, LLCSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0537700885 pdf
Sep 09 2020Anuvia Plant Nutrients CorporationPONTIFAX AGTECH INVESTMENTS: ANUVIA SERIES C BRIDGE, LLCSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0537700885 pdf
Dec 30 2020Anuvia Plant Nutrients CorporationANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS IP HOLDINGS LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0547770465 pdf
Dec 31 2020PONTIFAX AGTECH INVESTMENTS: ANUVIA SERIES C BRIDGE, LLCANUVIA PLANT CITY LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0552390028 pdf
Dec 31 2020PONTIFAX AGTECH INVESTMENTS: ANUVIA SERIES C BRIDGE, LLCANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS IP HOLDINGS LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0552390028 pdf
Dec 31 2020PONTIFAX AGTECH INVESTMENTS: ANUVIA SERIES C BRIDGE, LLCAnuvia Plant Nutrients CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0552390028 pdf
Dec 31 2020PONTIFAX AGTECH INVESTMENTS: ANUVIA SERIES C BRIDGE, LLCANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS HOLDINGS, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0552390028 pdf
Feb 28 2023ANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS HOLDINGS INC GENERATE LENDING, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0629260436 pdf
Feb 28 2023ANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS IP HOLDINGS LLCGENERATE LENDING, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0629260436 pdf
Aug 04 2023ANUVIA PLANT CITY LLCPROFILE PRODUCTS LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0648960805 pdf
Aug 04 2023ANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS HOLDINGS INC PROFILE PRODUCTS LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0648960805 pdf
Aug 04 2023ANUVIA PLANT NUTRIENTS IP HOLDINGS LLCPROFILE PRODUCTS LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0648960805 pdf
Aug 04 2023Anuvia Plant Nutrients CorporationPROFILE PRODUCTS LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0648960805 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Nov 13 2019BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).
Dec 03 2019SMAL: Entity status set to Small.
Apr 29 2024BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jun 04 20274 years fee payment window open
Dec 04 20276 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 04 2028patent expiry (for year 4)
Jun 04 20302 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jun 04 20318 years fee payment window open
Dec 04 20316 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 04 2032patent expiry (for year 8)
Jun 04 20342 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jun 04 203512 years fee payment window open
Dec 04 20356 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 04 2036patent expiry (for year 12)
Jun 04 20382 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)