Apparatus, method, and system for exposing a photosensitive printing plate to radiation, including a plurality of led point sources configured to emit UV light. The plurality of led point sources in at least one of a front side set or back side set are controllable in subsets smaller than an entirety of the collective irradiation field corresponding to the respective set. A holder receives the printing plate in a stationary position to receive incident radiation and a controller is configured to control the plurality of led source subsets. A first led point source subset is configured to be controlled at a first intensity differing by a factor relative to a second intensity of a second led point source subset to give the radiation emitted by the respective set an intended degree of homogeneity.
|
8. A process for exposing a printing plate comprising a photosensitive polymer activated by exposure to radiation, the printing plate having a non-printing back side and a printing front side with a mask for defining an image to be printed, the method comprising:
controlling one or more radiation sources collectively arranged to expose the front side and the back side of the printing plate to radiation, the front side radiation source and the back side radiation source each comprising a respective set of led point sources each configured to emit UV light, the plurality of led point sources in at least one of the front side set or back side set controllable in a plurality of led point source subsets smaller than an entirety of the collective irradiation field corresponding to the respective set, wherein the plurality of led point source subsets are controllable together, individually controllable, or controllable in one or more groups;
measuring radiation output from the plurality of subsets of led point sources with a sensor configured to measure incident radiation at a predetermined distance from each of the plurality of subsets of led sources, and varying intensity of at least one subset of led sources by a factor relative to another subset of led sources, based upon the incident radiation measured by the sensor, to give the radiation emitted by the respective set an intended degree of homogeneity.
1. An apparatus for exposing a printing plate, the printing plate comprising a photosensitive polymer activated by exposure to radiation, the printing plate having a non-printing back side and a printing front side with a mask for defining an image to be printed, the apparatus comprising:
a plurality of radiation sources collectively arranged to expose the front side and the back side of the printing plate to radiation, including a back side radiation source, and a front side radiation source, the front side radiation source comprising a front side set of led point sources and the back side radiation source comprising a back side set of led point sources, each led point source configured to emit UV light, one or both of the front side set of led point sources and the back side set of led point sources comprising a plurality of independently controllable led point source subsets smaller than an entirety of the collective irradiation field corresponding to the respective front side or back side set;
a holder configured to receive the printing plate in a stationary position to receive incident radiation from the one or more radiation sources during irradiating the printing plate;
a controller connected to the one or more radiation sources and configured to control the plurality of led point source subsets, such that the plurality of led point source subsets are controllable together, individually controllable or controllable in one or more groups; and
a sensor configured to measure incident radiation at a predetermined distance from each led point source subset, each led point source subset having a variable intensity configured to be varied by a factor relative to another led point source subset, based upon the incident radiation measured by the sensor, to cause the radiation emitted by the respective set of led point sources to have an intended degree of homogeneity.
13. A system for preparing a printing plate, the printing plate comprising a photosensitive polymer activated by exposure to actinic radiation and having a non-printing back side and a printing front side with a mask for defining an image to be printed, the printing plate having a lateral width and a lateral length and disposed in a stationary position, the system comprising:
an apparatus comprising:
a plurality of radiation sources configured to emit the actinic radiation toward the printing plate with the printing plate in the stationary position, each of the radiation sources comprises a light emitting diode (led) configured to emit actinic ultraviolet (UV) radiation, the plurality of radiation sources including:
a set of front led sources positioned to emit radiation toward the front side of the plate, the set of front led sources together defining a collective irradiation field covering an area at least coextensive with at least one of the lateral length and lateral width of the plate;
a set of back led sources positioned to emit radiation toward the back side of the plate, the set of back led sources together defining a collective irradiation field covering an area at least coextensive with at least one of the lateral length and lateral width of the plate;
at least one controller connected to the plurality of radiation sources and configured to activate the plurality of radiation sources to emit the actinic radiation in a predetermined pattern, the plurality of radiation sources in at least one of the set of back led sources or the set of front led sources controllable in subsets smaller than an entirety of the collective irradiation field corresponding to the respective set, such that the plurality of led point source subsets are controllable together, individually controllable, or controllable in one or more groups, and wherein at least a first led point source subset is configured to be controlled by the at least one controller at a first intensity differing by a factor relative to a second intensity of a second led point source subset to give the radiation emitted by the respective set an intended degree of homogeneity; and
a holder for disposing the printing plate in the stationary position, the holder comprising a material that is transmissive of the actinic radiation and that defines a horizontal surface relative to a ground on which the apparatus is disposed.
2. The apparatus of
3. The apparatus of
4. The apparatus of
5. The apparatus of
6. The apparatus of
7. The apparatus of
9. The process of
11. The process of
12. The process of
14. The system of
15. The system of
16. The system of
17. The system of
18. The system of
19. The system of
20. The system of
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/926,076 (status: allowed), titled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXPOSURE OF FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATES USING LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) RADIATION SOURCES, filed Jul. 10, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/926,616, titled PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLED EXPOSURE OF FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATES AND ADJUSTING THE FLOOR THEREOF, filed Mar. 20, 2018 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,732,507, which is a continuation-in-part of PCT Application Ser. No. PCT/IB2016/001660, titled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLED EXPOSURE OF FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATES, filed 26 Oct. 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/246,276, filed on 26 Oct. 2015. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/926,616 also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/473,784, titled “PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR ADJUSTING THE FLOOR OF A FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE IN A CONTROLLED EXPOSURE SYSTEM OR PROCESS,” filed 20 Mar. 2017. All of the foregoing are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Many processes are known in the art for preparing polymer printing plates, such as photopolymer flexographic plates and letterpress printing plates coated with photopolymer material. One known process starts with a plate having an ablatable material thereon, imaging the plate in a digital imager to ablate the ablatable material according to imaging data, and then curing the exposed plate by exposure of the plate to radiation, such as light energy, including but not limited to ultraviolet (UV) light energy.
Various processes for curing the plate on both the imaged side and the back side of the plate by exposure to a functional energy source are known, including methods for providing a blanket exposure (such as with fluorescent light tubes that emit UV light), and methods for providing the desired radiation using light emitting diode (LED) technology, such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,389,203, assigned to the assignee of the present application and incorporated by reference. One particularly useful LED arrangement is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,578,854, also incorporated herein by reference.
Known processes include exposing the back of a plate, then performing laser ablation on the front side of the plate, then performing front side exposure. Other processes include laser ablating the front side of the plate, then curing one side of the plate using a blanket exposure, manually flipping the plate, and then curing the other side of the plate. Each of the foregoing processes interposes an undefined, variable time delay between the first and second exposure, depending upon the amount of time for the laser ablation step in the first process, or depending upon the time it takes to manually flip the plate, in the second. This variability in elapsed time between first and second exposure leads to undesirable variability in plate quality. Still other processes may include exposing both the back side and the front side of a plate simultaneously, which although it produces more predictable results than a process that imposes a variable time delay, is still not optimal, as discussed more herein later.
In the field of printing, minimizing the size of a dot printed on a substrate is desirable, but smaller dots correspond to smaller printing plate elements, which are more susceptible to damage during use. Accordingly, there is always a need in the art to reduce the size or printed dots, while also providing optimal stability of the printing elements on the plate for making those printed dots.
One aspect of the invention comprises an apparatus for preparing a printing plate, the apparatus comprising a plurality of radiation sources configured to emit the actinic radiation, each of the radiation sources comprises a light emitting diode (LED), such as an LED sources configured to emit actinic ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The plurality of radiation sources includes one or both of a set of front LED sources positioned to emit radiation toward the front side of the plate, with the plate disposed in a stationary position, and a set of back LED sources positioned to emit radiation toward the back side of the plate. The plurality of front LED sources together define a collective irradiation field covering an area at least coextensive with the lateral length and lateral width of the plate, and the plurality of back LED sources together define a collective irradiation field covering an area at least coextensive with the lateral length and lateral width of the plate. One or both of the sets of front and back LED sources may be stationary. A controller is connected to the plurality of radiation sources and configured to activate the plurality of radiation sources to emit the actinic radiation in a predetermined pattern that includes a time difference between activation of at least a portion of the set of back LED sources and activation of at least a portion of the set of front LED sources. A holder may be configured to receive the printing plate in the stationary position to receive incident radiation from the plurality of radiation sources. The holder may comprise a material that transmits the actinic radiation, such as a horizontal surface relative to a ground on which the apparatus is disposed of a holder that defines a cylindrical surface. In another embodiment, the holder may be configured to hold the plate in a vertical orientation relative to a ground on which the apparatus is disposed. The apparatus of may include optics, such as mirrors, for directing and/or confining the radiation emitted from each set of LED sources.
The predetermined pattern may include all of the set of front LED sources emitting actinic radiation simultaneously, all of the set of back LED sources emitting actinic radiation simultaneously, or a combination thereof. The predetermined pattern may include a time difference between activation of at least a portion of the set of back LED sources and activation of at least a portion of the set of front LED sources. The plurality of radiation sources may be individually controllable or controllable in subsets smaller than an entirety of the collective irradiation field corresponding to each set. The predetermined pattern may comprise a sequence that mimics relative motion between the irradiation field and the plate. The predetermined pattern may preclude simultaneously irradiating the front and the back of the plate by respective LEDs spatially aligned with one another relative to a same cross-sectional coordinate of the plate. The predetermined pattern may include activation of multiple portions of the set of front LED sources and the set of back LED sources simultaneously, such as in a pattern that mimics multiple carriages. The predetermined pattern may include activation of all of the plurality of back LED sources simultaneously and then all of the plurality of front LED sources simultaneously, with a predetermined time delay applied between each front and back exposure. The predetermined pattern may include providing a plurality of exposure steps at an intensity that is less than a full amount of actinic radiation required to cure a corresponding side of the plate to a desired degree of curing.
The apparatus may be configured to deliver a first radiation intensity in one exposure step and a second, lesser exposure intensity in another exposure step. The first radiation intensity and the second, lesser exposure intensity may be delivered with the same set of LED sources. The set of front LED sources has a first nominal radiation intensity and the set of back LED sources has a second nominal radiation intensity. The predetermined pattern includes activation of the back LED sources at the second nominal radiation intensity in one exposure step, and activation of the back LED sources at a radiation intensity less than the second nominal intensity another exposure step.
Each set of LED sources comprises a plurality of discrete arrays having a plurality of individual LED point sources on each array, with the plurality of LED point sources arranged in a plurality of lines. The plurality of LED point sources on each array may be controllable together, individually controllable, or controllable in groups, such as each line of LED point sources in each array being separately controllable. The radiation intensity generated by at least one line of LED point sources may differ from a corresponding radiation intensity generated by at least one other line of LED point sources for a same amount of input energy, wherein the controller is configured to control the radiation intensity produced by each line to achieve an intended degree of homogeneity.
Another aspect of the invention comprises a method for calibrating the apparatus as described herein by periodically characterizing radiation intensity generated by a plurality of lines of LED point sources and adjusting input energy to the respective plurality of lines of LED point sources to account for variations in the lines over time. The characterization may be performed by positioning a sensor that measures incident radiation at a predetermined distance from each line of LED sources. The method may include tailoring radiation intensity of one or more groups of the LED point sources to compensate for variations in transmissivity of a structure that lies between the sources and the printing plate.
Still another aspect of the invention comprises a method for exposing a photopolymer printing plate to actinic radiation from a UV LED light source, the photopolymer printing plate having a non-printing back side and a printing front side with a mask for defining an image to be printed. The method comprises the steps of (a) positioning the photopolymer printing plate in an exposure unit, wherein the exposure unit comprises a plurality of UV LED radiation sources; and (b) exposing the photopolymer printing plate through the mask to actinic radiation from the plurality of UV LED light sources to cure a portion of the photopolymer in the plate in an exposure step during which the plurality of UV LED radiation sources and the photocurable printing plate do not move relative to each other. A first exposure intensity is provided in one exposure step and a second, different exposure intensity is provided in another exposure step. Where the exposure unit has optics, including mirrors, the exposure step may comprise directing the radiation emitted from the plurality of UV LED radiation sources with the mirrors. The plurality of UV LED radiation sources may comprise one or more sets of LED sources, each set of LED sources together defining a collective irradiation field covering an area at least coextensive with a lateral length and lateral width of the plate. The plurality of UV LED radiation sources emit the actinic radiation at a first intensity, wherein the actinic radiation reaching a photocurable surface of the printing plate may be less than the first intensity, such as wherein a portion of the actinic radiation emitted by the plurality of UV LED radiation sources is not transmitted by a surface on which the plate is mounted, blocked by a substrate on which the photocurable polymer is disposed, or a combination thereof.
The first exposure intensity may be provided in one or more back exposure steps and the second exposure intensity may be provided in one or more front exposure steps. The method may include performing the first exposure step with the plurality of UV LED light sources emitting at a nominal intensity, and the second exposure step with the plurality of UV LED light sources emitting at less than the nominal intensity. The first exposure step and the second exposure step may both be back exposure steps. The method may comprise providing a plurality of back exposure steps including at least a first back-only exposure step and a second back exposure step followed by a predetermined time delay followed by a front exposure step, including adjusting the intensity of the one or more of the plurality of UV LED light sources in at least one of the back exposure steps to provide a predetermined ratio Rbf between front side and back side exposure of the printing plate.
Those of skill in the art understand that oxygen is distributed throughout the photopolymer resin of a polymer plate at the time it is typically processed, and that oxygen is an inhibitor of the polymerization reaction commonly harnessed for curing the plates. Although polymerization caused by exposure of the polymer to actinic radiation scavenges this distributed oxygen, ambient oxygen will diffuse back into the resin over time if the plate is in contact with atmospheric air. Surprisingly, in processes in which a back exposure and main exposure are both performed on a plate, it has been found that fine detail on a plate may be optimized by imparting a defined delay between performing the back exposure and the main exposure. Without being held to any particular mechanism, it is believed that in this defined delay time following the back exposure, which scavenges oxygen from the back portion of the plate, oxygen from the front side of the plate starts to diffuse to the back side, thus creating a slightly less oxygen rich concentration in the area of the plate nearest the floor of the plate, such that the polymerization reactions near the floor of the plate react for longer before stopping and therefore create shapes on the plate that taper from the floor toward the top of the plate following the main exposure. It should be noted that a delay that is too long will reset the entire plate to being oxygen saturated, and a delay that is too short may not permit sufficient oxygen diffusion to produce optimal results. Thus, while the amount of the optimal delay may vary depending on any number of characteristics, what is important is that the delay not be too long or too short, for optimal results. This delay may be imparted in any number of ways, described in more detail herein.
An exemplary apparatus 100 for the back exposure of photosensitive printing plate 130 is shown schematically in
In apparatus 100, a UV source of actinic radiation 120 with a predetermined power density is scanned at a specific speed (v) under the bottom of the plate. For the main or front exposure of the photosensitive printing plate a second UV source of radiation 110 with a predetermined power density (irradiance) is scanned above the plate with the same specific speed (v). UV sources of radiation 110 and 120 are configured to scan the printing plate with the same speed (v). Such a configuration may be provided by synchronizing sources 110 and 120 to have a same speed using a controller, or both sources may be attached to a common carriage that traverses the plate, with sources 110 and 120 spaced apart from one another a suitable distance in the direction of carriage travel to provide the desired delay when the carriage moves at a predetermined speed. The predetermined irradiance may be the same for the main side and the back side, or may be different. Preferably the irradiance at the rear side is only a fraction of the irradiance of the front side exposure. Typically, the irradiance at the rear side is in a range of 10% or less of the front side irradiance, but the invention is not limited to any particular ratio of front to back irradiance. The predetermined irradiance is typically a function of the characteristics of the specific type of plate to be exposed, as is known to those of skill in the art, and as is dictated by the manufacturers of such plates.
The time delay between the back exposure with UV source of radiation 120 and the main exposure with UV source of radiation 110 may be adjusted by the control system 140 by adjusting the speed of the sources and/or mechanically by setting a constant distance (D) between the sources during the scan process. The time delay t=D/v. Thus, mechanically varying D has an impact on the delay, as does the relative speed between the plate and the sources during exposure. The time delay can be optimized to get smaller single dot elements on the photosensitive printing plate after processing and smaller single element dot sizes printed on the print substrate. It should be understood that the arrangement depicted in
The relative movement between the radiation sources and the plate may be provided by any mechanism known in the art for moving objects relative to a horizontal, vertical, or otherwise disposed stationary surface. For configurations in which the radiation sources move and the plate is stationary, for example, the sources may be disposed on a gantry system having arms that pass the respective sources above and beneath a stationary horizontal plate mounted on a substrate configured to permit a sufficient amount of radiation to pass through, or on either side of a vertically mounted plate. For configurations in which the radiation sources are stationary and the plate is movable, for example, the plate may be mounted on any mechanism known in the art, such as a movable stage configured to move relative to fixed sources on opposite sides of the stage. Mechanisms for rotating a cylinder on which a plate is mounted relative to fixed sources are well known in the field of printing. Similarly, mechanisms for rotating sources relative to a fixed cylinder on which a stationary object is mounted are also well known, such as in the field of medicine (e.g. CAT scan machines). Thus, mechanisms for moving one or more elements relative to another are well known in the art, generally, and the invention is not limited to any particular mechanism.
As shown in
In one embodiment, shown in
The overall mechanism for creating the exposure may comprise a table having an outer frame 1110 that holds a transparent (e.g. glass) inner portion 1112. The upper 1120 and lower 1122 linear radiation sources (e.g. banks of LED point sources, optionally mounted inside a reflective housing) are mounted on a gantry system or carriage 1130. The radiation sources are connected to a power source, such as an electrical power cord having sufficient slack to extend the full range of motion of the carriage. Tracks (not shown) disposed on the outer frame portion provide a defined path for the gantry system or carriage to traverse. The carriage may be moved on the tracks by any drive mechanism known in the art (also coupled to the power supply and the controller), including a chain drive, a spindle drive, gear drive, or the like. The drive mechanism for the carriage may comprise one or more components mounted within the carriage, one or more components fixed to the table, or a combination thereof. A position sensor (not shown) is preferably coupled to the carriage to provide feedback to the controller regarding the precise location of the carriage at any given time. The control signal output from the controller for operating the radiation sources and for controlling motion of the carriage may be supplied via a wired or wireless connection. The controller may be mounted in a fixed location, such as connected to the table with a control signal cable attached to the sources similar to the power cable, or may be mounted in or on the carriage. The control system and drive mechanism cooperate to cause back/forth relative motion in a transverse direction between the light from the radiation sources and the plate. It should be understood that other embodiments may be devised in which the drive mechanism is configured to move the portion of the table containing the plate past stationary upper and lower linear radiation sources, as well as embodiments in which the radiation sources cover less than the full width of the plate and are movable in both the transverse and longitudinal direction to provide total plate coverage (or the plate is movable in both directions, or the plate is movable in one of the two directions and the sources are movable in the other direction to provides the full range of motion required to cover the entire plate).
In one work flow configuration, the table for conducting the exposure step (i.e. exposure table) as described above may be positioned to automatically receive an imaged plate from an imager. For example, an imager may be positioned so that the imaged plate expelled therefrom lands in a first location, and a robotic handling device may be configured to automatically pick up and move the imaged plate from the first location to a processing location on the exposure table, where the exposure process as described herein is then performed using transverse linear sources attached to a carriage that traverses the plate longitudinally.
As discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,578,854 and illustrated schematically in
The term “single element structure number” as used herein refers to a square defined by the total number of pixels that comprises that square. For example, a “64-pixel single element structure” comprises square 200, which comprises an 8×8 grid of pixels 202, and has a total of 64 pixels, as illustrated in
The term “dot top diameter” refers to the diameter of the top of a printing plate element or “dot” (i.e. the portion of the element that contacts the printing surface), as illustrated in
For optimization of the time delay, single element structures of various sizes were imaged by a laser into the mask of a photosensitive printing plate at a resolution of 4000 dpi. For this example, a Model No. DPR 045 printing plate, manufactured by DuPont, was used.
The photosensitive printing plates were then back exposed, such as by using UV radiation source 120, and main exposed, such as by using UV radiation source 110, as depicted in
Results of exemplary time delays for exemplary single element structure numbers 64 and 144 are shown in
The optimized results shown in
Although the exemplary system shown in
In one embodiment 700 depicted in
In another exemplary embodiment 800, depicted in
One exemplary control pattern may activate the radiation subsources in a sequence that causes relative motion between the radiation field and the plate, such as a movement that essentially mimics the same light patterns that would be provided by main and back linear sources attached to a carriage, but with the advantage of having no moving parts. The illumination pattern may be configured to illuminate multiple portions of the front and back simultaneously (e.g. such as in a pattern that mimics multiple carriages—one starting at one end of the plate, and one starting in the middle). The illumination pattern in such a configuration is not constrained to patterns that mimic one or more carriages, however, and may be implemented in any pattern that provides the desired time delay, overall exposure, and lack of simultaneous exposure from front and back for any particular cross sectional coordinate of the plate. The pattern may also comprise illuminating the entire back at once and then the entire front, either in a single exposure for each side, or in fractional exposures of the full required exposure for each side, with the desired time delay applied between each front and back exposure. Furthermore, although shown in a flat configuration, it should be understood that systems in which both the plate and the sources are stationary may also be arranged in a cylindrical configuration.
Optionally, the embodiment shown in
In yet another exemplary embodiment 900, a stationary plate 930 may be subjected to irradiation from a single linear source 915 that is configured to pass over both the front side and back side of the plate at a speed that provides the desired time delay, with a controller 940 that, for example, may turn the source on and off at the appropriate times or modulate the amount of radiation between a main exposure intensity and a back side exposure intensity, as needed. The plate may be disposed on a substrate 960 in a horizontal system, as depicted in
It should be understood that the invention is not limited to any particular physical embodiment, and that the method of the invention of incorporating an optimized delay between back side and front side exposure may be performed in any system having any physical configuration.
In a method for optimizing the time delay for a specific type of printing plate at a specific set of exposure conditions, also illustrated in
Notably, as illustrated in
Such a configuration may be provided by a spatial configuration as depicted with respect to
Finally, while the time delay may be the same for each area of the plate, it should be understood that depending upon the configuration of the radiation sources, controller, and control scheme, one portion of the plate may be irradiated differently than another, if desired.
Processes for Increasing Back-Exposure
As described above, photo polymer printing plates typically need UV exposure from the front side and the back side. The front side exposure is applied through the mask, which holds the image information that shall be imposed to the printing plate. The rear side is exposed to UV radiation through the rear side plastic substrate without any vignetting in order to build a polymerized support layer over the entire plate for the fine printing details located on the plates front side. This polymerized support layer is called “floor.” The floor thickness determines the relief depth for a given plate thickness.
Recent advances in technology for curing of photopolymer printing plates with UV light has produced a variety of LED-based exposure units from various suppliers. These units comprising LED UV light sources are increasingly replacing so-called “bank” exposure devices that incorporate fluorescent tube technology, in which light from the fluorescent tubes typically covers the complete plate surface at one time. Because LEDs are more expensive and require more complex driver electronics, while delivering a much higher UV power-per-unit-surface-area than fluorescent tubes, many embodiments comprise a light source that covers only one dimension of the polymer plate completely (e.g. width), while using relative motion between the plate and UV head to cover the second dimension (e.g. length), to ensure all surface areas of the plate are exposed to the UV light. One example of a state of the art exposure system is the XPS 5080 system manufactured by ESKO. This exposure system is equipped with 3 identical UV heads: two for front side exposure, and one for rear side exposure.
Thus, in one embodiment of the invention, the exposure system comprises three (typically identical) UV heads (e.g. linear sources) comprising a plurality of LED sources: two heads directed to the front side (also referred to herein as the “main exposure heads”), and one head directed to the rear side (also referred to herein as the “back exposure heads”), as shown in
Using the apparatus and method described above may present a challenge with respect to curing photopolymer printing plates having back sides that are less sensitive to UV radiation. Such lesser sensitivity may arise from relatively higher photo-blocker content in the plate rear-side plastic substrate. One way of overcoming this challenge is to apply back exposure energy to the plate rear side prior to the combined back-main exposure steps.
For common standard polymer plates, the ratio (Rbf) between the predetermined amount of energy applied to the rear (back) side and energy applied to the front side of the plate to achieve desired results, ranges according to plate supplier information from 1:5 to 1:40, respectively 20% to 2.5%, depending on the plate type and the relief depth to be achieved.
A standard polymer printing plate, such as for example, the DuPont® model DPR 045 plate, may require approximately 12 minutes of front exposure and about 60 Seconds of back exposure for complete curing on a bank exposure unit. In an LED UV exposure unit configured such as those described herein, and in particular in the XPS 5080 system manufactured by Esko-Imaging Graphics GmbH, Rbf may be as high as 16%.
In certain highly-UV-sensitive plates, such as EXS model plates from DuPont or FTF plates from Flint, a back exposure of only about 6 seconds would optimally be required using such systems, if the plates were not otherwise adjusted. As most bank exposure units control exposure time in 1-second increments, adjusting the floor thickness with back exposure for such high sensitive plates would be very difficult to achieve, without making some adjustments to the plate structure. Hence, plate suppliers now add a higher content of UV blocker into the rear side UV-transmissive, dimensionally-stable plastic substrate of the plate, which blocks a substantial amount of UV from participating in the curing process from the rear side. Such adjustments by plate suppliers have pushed Rbf closer to, for example, approximately 50%.
Unfortunately, if the content of UV blocker inside the rear side plastic substrate is not controlled very precisely by the plate suppliers and varies from one plate charge to another, it may be necessary to control the resulting floor thickness of the plates periodically by readjusting the back exposure UV-energy accordingly.
Moreover, in many configurations, the plate typically lies flat on a glass table with its rear side adjacent the glass plate and is back-exposed through this glass plate. The glass plate typically has a UV transmission of around 80%, consuming 20% UV, thereby pushing the Rbf as high as, for example, approximately 62.5% for the exemplary plates described above.
Another demand for increase of back exposure power arises from the fact that the exposure may be applied to the plate in several fractions. Using several smaller exposure-energy factions, the curing becomes less efficient, making the total exposure energy required for complete curing higher in comparison to an exposure applied in an uninterrupted step. The loss of efficiency due to using multiple exposure steps results in another increase in Rbf, bringing it close to, for example, approximately 75% for the exemplary plates described above.
An embodiment equipped with three identical heads—one UV head for back exposure and two UV heads for main exposure—as depicted in
It is thus not possible to adjust the floor thickness exclusively through irradiance of the rear side UV Head using three identical heads operating at the same power output, and for reasons described herein later, it may be desirable to use three identical heads with the same nominal power operating at that nominal power, for greatest efficiency and productivity. One method for supplying the missing 25% of back exposure UV power is to provide a back-only exposure step to provide the additional energy in an uninterrupted exposure into the rear side of the plate before the combined main and back exposure steps are commenced.
As shown in
A standard exposure process comprises at least two exposure steps, wherein in each step the exposure heads move from a start position along the polymer plate, exposing the plate to actinic UV radiation with constant speed V in the direction of the arrow shown in
As described herein, total exposure time is determined by UV output aperture of the UV heads in traveling direction, the speed by which the heads travel along the polymer plate and the number of passes the head moved along the plate. The width of the UV output aperture divided by the traveling speed results in the time that a pixel in the plate “sees” UV light. This time is called “pixel time” in the following text.
The intent of the foregoing method is to obtain a cure of the polymer plate that is superior to a simple front and backside exposure each applied in only one uninterrupted step. “Superior” in this case means the plate holds smaller printing details, which are fixed to the plate floor with higher stability and that do not bend during printing. Producing smaller print dots enables production of lighter highlights in the print.
The back exposure energy is increased or decreased to adjust the floor thickness of the plate. This can be done either by adjusting the irradiance of the back exposure UV head, by adjusting the pixel time, or by adjusting both pixel time and irradiance. Due to the nature of the curing process, changing the pixel time is disfavored, as it can also affect the front exposure results, which may lead to unwanted curing and printing results. Thus the preferred method for adjusting the plate floor thickness is to change the irradiance.
Productivity is a highly desirable characteristic of UV exposure devices, and thus it is favorable to run the UV light sources at the nominal UV output in order to supply the energy to the plate required for curing as fast as possible. As a consequence, both front exposure UV heads in the system depicted in
In the example discussed above, where the irradiance of the back exposure head cannot be increased any further, absent some other remedy, the UV output of the back exposure would have to be set to maximum and the pixel time increased by 50% to reach the required floor thickness (with some corresponding change to the front exposure to adjust for the increased time). This approach may affect the quality of the front exposure curing result, and thus, it may be necessary to evaluate the complete set of exposing parameters to maintain desirable plate printing quality.
Alternatively the number of exposure cycles may be increased until the accumulated rear side exposure energy is sufficient to cure the plate floor to the required thickness. But this approach will also increase the front exposure energy, leading to higher energy input if the front exposure irradiance stays the same as before the increase in the number of cycles, which may lead to different curing and printing results. Also if the irradiance of the front exposure is reduced to maintain the front exposure energy the same as before the increase of the number of exposure cycles, this may lead to different curing and printing results, making this an imperfect solution.
Table 1 below provides a survey of different Rbf ratios for various exemplary plate types. As shown in Table 1, the Rbf ratio increases for thicker plate materials. For thicker plate material and also for the new highly-UV-sensitive materials, like the EXS plate from DuPont or the FTF plate from Flint, there is a need for further improving the efficiency of the XPS exposure device. The plates listed in the table are merely examples, and the invention is not limited only to use with digital flexographic printing plates listed.
TABLE 1
UV back side
UV main side
energy
no of
energy
Ratio
back side
Irradiance
speed
cycles
main side
Irradiance
Back/Front
Plate type
[mJ/cm2]
[mW/cm2]
[mm/s]
[n]
[mJ/cm2]
[mW/cm2]
Rbf [%]
DRAVE 045
3944
136
9.9
4
9019
311
43.7
DRAVE 067
4350
150
9.9
4
9019
311
48.2
One preferred method for bringing more back side exposure energy into the plate, without sacrificing the desired printing results of the plate derived from the proper selection of exposure parameters, comprises executing one or more additional back exposure steps prior to the consecutive combined back and front exposure steps discussed herein. This additional back exposure step is preferably applied directly before starting the consecutive exposure steps.
Thus, for the processes described and depicted relative to
The energy applied by the additional back exposure steps may be controlled by the exposure time, namely by the speed by which the UV head is moved along the plate rear side. In order to keep the time period for this additional exposure step as short as possible, the UV irradiance of the rear exposure UV head is ideally operated at the nominal maximum.
The amount of additional back exposure UV-energy may be controlled by controlling the irradiance of the back exposure UV-heads, by adding more back exposure steps (each step comprising a fractional amount of a total that is predetermined to be required to provide the desired floor thickness adjustment), or by some combination of irradiance, exposure time (the speed by which the UV head is moved along the polymer plate rear side), and the number of additional exposure steps.
Additional back exposure steps are added whenever the nominal back exposure irradiance is not sufficient for complete curing of the floor to the required thickness. The additional back exposure step or steps (as well as any and all of the method steps described herein) may be implemented via the apparatus controller, which controller may be in the form of computer hardware programmed with software instructions for causing the components of the apparatus to perform the subject steps. Although shown and described in connection with a certain embodiments of the invention described herein, it should be understood that exposure processes comprising additional back-exposure steps are not limited to any particular process or apparatus. Similarly, although the use of additional back-only exposure steps may be particularly suitable for UV exposure systems, this aspect of the invention is not limited to any particular radiation system.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to specific embodiments, the invention is not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the invention.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described herein, it will be understood that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the appended claims cover all such variations as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Sievers, Wolfgang, Wolterink, Jörg, Hänsel, Thomas
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10025183, | Jan 22 2014 | CITIBANK, N A | Photosensitive resin composition |
10036956, | May 03 2016 | CITIBANK, N A | Method of making relief image printing elements |
10175580, | Dec 17 2014 | Flint Group Germany GmbH | Method for producing a flexographic printing frame through multiple exposures using UV LEDS |
10732507, | Oct 26 2015 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Process and apparatus for controlled exposure of flexographic printing plates and adjusting the floor thereof |
11333980, | Oct 26 2015 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Method and apparatus for exposure of flexographic printing plates using light emitting diode (LED) radiation sources |
3981583, | Aug 23 1973 | NIPPON PAINT CO , LTD , A CORP OF JAPAN | Apparatus for automatically processing photopolymer plates |
4927723, | Jun 17 1987 | PT SUB, INC | Relief printing plate manufacture |
5073792, | May 24 1989 | Machine for the continuous contact exposure of photosensitive materials | |
5386268, | Jul 26 1993 | E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY | Exposure unit and method for exposing photosensitive materials |
6238837, | May 01 1995 | E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY | Flexographic element having an infrared ablatable layer |
6266134, | Jan 20 1998 | KODAK CANADA ULC | System for exposing photopolymer with light from compact movable light source |
6326127, | Dec 31 1998 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A | Photo-curable polymer composition and flexographic printing plates containing the same |
6352815, | Dec 23 1998 | BASF Drucksysteme GmbH | Production of large-format composite relief printing plates by laser positioning and subsequent image recording by means of a laser |
6355395, | Dec 23 1998 | BASF Drucksysteme GmbH | Photopolymerizable printing plates with top layer for producing relief printing plates |
6383690, | Dec 09 1999 | Agfa Corporation | Platemaking system and method using an imaging mask made from photochromic film |
6683421, | Jan 25 2001 | EXCELITAS CANADA, INC | Addressable semiconductor array light source for localized radiation delivery |
6700598, | Apr 25 2000 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Digital imaging system employing non-coherent light source |
6903809, | May 29 2003 | PerkinElmer, Inc. | Integrated, in-line bumping and exposure system |
6908726, | Apr 07 2003 | Eastman Kodak Company | Thermally imageable elements imageable at several wavelengths |
6931992, | Feb 25 2004 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Combined ablation and exposure system and method |
7358026, | Sep 15 2005 | DUPONT ELECTRONICS, INC | Method for thermal development of a photosensitive element using a development medium having a support |
7632625, | May 25 2004 | CITIBANK, N A | Method of pre-exposing relief image printing plate |
7682775, | Mar 05 2004 | E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY | Process for preparing a flexographic printing plate |
7691550, | Jun 20 2007 | E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY | Method for making a relief printing form |
7709183, | Jul 09 2003 | Asahi Kasei Chemicals Corporation | Method and device for manufacturing relief printing plate terminal for seamless printing |
7767383, | Aug 08 2007 | CITIBANK, N A | Method of pre-exposing relief image printing plate |
7875321, | Dec 11 2002 | AGFA Offset BV | Preparation of flexographic printing plates using ink jet recording |
8034540, | Jul 31 2008 | MIRACLON CORPORATION | System and method employing secondary back exposure of flexographic plate |
8114569, | May 30 2006 | PhotoCentriC Limited | Maskless photopolymer exposure process and apparatus |
8153347, | Dec 04 2008 | Eastman Kodak Company | Flexographic element and method of imaging |
8227769, | May 27 2008 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Curing of photo-curable printing plates with flat tops or round tops |
8389203, | May 08 2007 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Exposing printing plates using light emitting diodes |
8399178, | Oct 05 2007 | MacDermid Printing Solutions Europe SAS | Method of producing a relief image arrangement usable in particular in the field of flexography and arrangement produced according to this method |
8501391, | Jun 18 2007 | Asahi Kasei E-Materials Corporation | Photosensitive resin composition, flexographic printing plate, and method for producing flexographic printing plate |
8524442, | Feb 13 2012 | CITIBANK, N A | Integrated membrane lamination and UV exposure system and method of the same |
8578854, | May 23 2008 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Curing of photo-curable printing plates using a light tunnel of mirrored walls and having a polygonal cross-section like a kaleidoscope |
8790864, | Aug 27 2012 | CITIBANK, N A | Method of improving print performance in flexographic printing plates |
8820234, | Oct 30 2009 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Curing of photo-curable printing plates with flat tops or round tops by variable speed exposure |
8900798, | Oct 18 2010 | Eastman Kodak Company | On-press developable lithographic printing plate precursors |
8994916, | Aug 15 2011 | ZHONGSHAN AISCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Double-sided maskless exposure system and method |
9040226, | May 13 2013 | CITIBANK, N A | Method of improving print performance in flexographic printing plates |
9057958, | Mar 31 2008 | DUPONT ELECTRONICS, INC | Apparatus for thermal development with a conformable support |
9063426, | Sep 25 2013 | FUTURE TECH CAPITAL, LLC | Method of manufacturing a flexographic printing plate with support structures |
9134612, | Mar 27 2012 | DUPONT ELECTRONICS, INC | Printing form precursor having elastomeric cap layer and a method of preparing a printing form from the precursor |
9463617, | Apr 19 2012 | SASU VIANORD ENGINEERING | Method and apparatus for the photopolymerization and the washing in series of digital printing plates for flexography |
9671695, | Jul 15 2013 | Flint Group Germany GmbH | Process of manufacturing flexographic printing forms |
9703201, | Apr 22 2015 | CITIBANK, N A | Method of making relief image printing plates |
9740099, | Nov 12 2014 | CITIBANK, N A | Flexographic printing plate with improved cure efficiency |
9740103, | Nov 09 2015 | CITIBANK, N A | Method and apparatus for producing liquid flexographic printing plates |
9849663, | May 08 2007 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | Exposing printing plates using light emitting diodes |
9889640, | Feb 06 2015 | Flint Group Germany GmbH | Automated UV-LED exposure of flexographic printing plates |
9937703, | Sep 30 2013 | Flint Group Germany GmbH | Device and method for the in-line production of flexographic printing plates |
20010052924, | |||
20020192569, | |||
20050011382, | |||
20050116176, | |||
20060124008, | |||
20060154180, | |||
20070071953, | |||
20070084368, | |||
20070146430, | |||
20070148582, | |||
20070218372, | |||
20080063981, | |||
20080197300, | |||
20080280227, | |||
20090188308, | |||
20090267269, | |||
20090272286, | |||
20090290891, | |||
20100028815, | |||
20100143840, | |||
20100173135, | |||
20110014573, | |||
20110104615, | |||
20110230585, | |||
20120157561, | |||
20120171434, | |||
20120266767, | |||
20120281408, | |||
20130209939, | |||
20130242276, | |||
20130340637, | |||
20140057207, | |||
20140335456, | |||
20140373742, | |||
20150004530, | |||
20150030984, | |||
20150086928, | |||
20160207299, | |||
20160229173, | |||
20160368260, | |||
20180004093, | |||
20180210345, | |||
20180217502, | |||
20200023632, | |||
CA2374207, | |||
CN101019073, | |||
CN101772424, | |||
CN102470662, | |||
CN104865390, | |||
CN105637419, | |||
CN1236361, | |||
CN1315677, | |||
CN1702557, | |||
CN204086810, | |||
CN204679755, | |||
CN205644018, | |||
DE102012109130, | |||
DE202004017044, | |||
EP7127, | |||
EP1804243, | |||
EP2124104, | |||
EP2128702, | |||
EP2313270, | |||
EP2317387, | |||
EP2508948, | |||
EP3035123, | |||
EP3054352, | |||
EP3086178, | |||
EP3086179, | |||
EP3121653, | |||
JP2003154628, | |||
JP2010091867, | |||
JP2011154080, | |||
JP2012145869, | |||
JP2013029739, | |||
JP3562865, | |||
JP8305006, | |||
TW201501594, | |||
WO2093285, | |||
WO2007012023, | |||
WO2008094607, | |||
WO2008135865, | |||
WO2008135866, | |||
WO2013158942, | |||
WO2014031146, | |||
WO2014035566, | |||
WO2015012880, | |||
WO2015044437, | |||
WO2015047444, | |||
WO2015112478, | |||
WO2017072588, | |||
WO2018096144, | |||
WO2018172374, | |||
WO2019018376, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 11 2022 | Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 11 2022 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 06 2027 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 06 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 06 2028 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 06 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 06 2031 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 06 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 06 2032 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 06 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 06 2035 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 06 2036 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 06 2036 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 06 2038 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |