A feed consumption monitoring system for monitoring and controlling the quantity of feed introduced to an aquaculture environment. The system includes utilization of a high contrast surface, which receives a supply of running water containing a quantity of feed particles, a camera assembly to capture images of the high contrast surface upon its contact with the supply of running water, and a mount assembly to support the foregoing components, and the system may also include a lighting assembly to illuminate the high contrast surface as well as a software component to analyze such images to determine whether the quantity of feed in the supply of running water is suboptimal.
|
1. A feed consumption monitoring system comprising:
a high contrast surface structured to receive a supply of running water, the supply of running water containing a quantity of feed particles;
a camera assembly structured to capture at least one image of said high contrast surface; and
a mount assembly structured to removably retain said camera assembly.
18. A feed consumption monitoring system comprising:
a high contrast surface structured to receive a supply of running water, the supply of running water containing a quantity of feed particles;
a camera assembly structured to capture at least one image of said high contrast surface;
a mount assembly structured to removably retain said camera assembly; and
a software component configured to analyze said at least one image, said analysis determinative of the quantity of feed particles in the supply of running water delivered to said high contrast surface.
2. The feed consumption monitoring system of
3. The feed consumption monitoring system of
4. The feed consumption monitoring system of
5. The feed consumption monitoring system of
6. The feed consumption monitoring system of
7. The feed consumption monitoring system of
8. The feed consumption monitoring system of
9. The feed consumption monitoring system of
10. The feed consumption monitoring system of
11. The feed consumption monitoring system of
12. The feed consumption monitoring system of
13. The feed consumption monitoring system of
14. The feed consumption monitoring system of
15. The feed consumption monitoring system of
16. The feed consumption monitoring system of
17. The feed consumption monitoring system of
19. The feed consumption monitoring system of
20. The feed consumption monitoring system of
21. The feed consumption monitoring system of
22. The feed consumption monitoring system of
23. The feed consumption monitoring system of
|
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 119 to a currently pending, U.S. Provisional application having Ser. No. 63/154,274 and filed on Feb. 26, 2021, as well as currently pending, U.S. Provisional application having Ser. No. 63/187,126 and filed on May 11, 2021, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates generally to utilizing an aquaculture system, or more specifically, a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) for aquaculture farming and more specifically, the present invention relates to a system for monitoring the quantity of aquaculture feed particles in RAS water to ensure aquaculture receive appropriate feed amounts. Further, the present invention relates to detecting and mitigating any inconsistencies in feed quantity to ensure a desired flavor profile and a desired size of aquaculture, as well as ensure the health of aquaculture produced by a prospective RAS.
Currently, there is a recognized alarming decline in conventional fisheries, which in turn is based on overfishing and harmful environmental happenings. At present, the demand for seafood exceeds the supply available from such conventional fisheries and it is predicted that with an increased world population, the demand for seafood will double in the immediate future. Accordingly, the inability of conventional fisheries to meet such an increasing demand for seafood has resulted in an equally increasing need for aquaculture systems or “fish farms” capable of significantly high volume of seafood production.
At the present day, a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) is commonly used in the aquaculture farming industry. Essentially, an RAS provides an aquaculture farming production a means for a financially favorable production method, at least through limiting water consumption for use in farming. RAS's have proven to be highly effective in the art of aquaculture farming and are being adopted all over the world. Although RAS's are generally well-received by the industry, when used, issues in aquaculture developing non-desired flavor profiles and RAS's experiencing unfavorable conditions are becoming more prevalent in conjunction with RAS farming. These issues are believed to be caused at least by the naturally occurring compound, Geosmin, which is an organic compound known to make water smell and taste foul to the average person. Further, these issues are also somewhat believed to be caused at least by the naturally occurring compound, 2-Methylisoborneol (MIB), which is an organic chemical also known to make water smell and taste foul to the average person. It is also known that these compounds are produced by microbiota, and/or a wide range of bacteria wherein when environmental conditions are fit, the microbiota will naturally produce such compounds. Evidence for these beliefs are at least found in tasting samples of non-desirably flavored aquacultures produced in an RAS, wherein the samples of the aquacultures have been found to contain chemical concentrations of the compounds, Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol and in testing for specific microbiota in the absence and in the presence of the two compounds. Thus, it becomes apparent that these issues are becoming more prevalent in RAS's and plausibly, are known to be caused by both Geosmin and MIB. Subsequently, the two compounds have been known to be called “off-flavors” or “off-flavorings” or singularly, an “off-flavor.” In some cases, an off-flavor may also be an organic bromo-compound. Such “off-flavors” are undesirable.
As mentioned above, an aquaculture farming operation may experience a wide range of complications while undergoing the act of farming aquaculture. Complications from degrading water quality, nutrient imbalances within the water, harmful algae growth, inconsistent aquaculture feed, harmful organic-compound growth and/or production, declining aquaculture health, aquaculture development of disease, aquaculture death, aquaculture flavor profile degradation, and more are sure to arise in most aquaculture farming operations at some point in a farming cycle. In some cases, such complications are unable to be detected until the aquaculture farming operation has experienced negative consequences. In such cases, experiencing negative consequences may be, but not be limited to, operating at a financial loss, degradation of product (aquaculture), infected and/or un-sellable product (aquaculture), deterioration of farming facilities, and/or overworking of farming facilities. Generally, all such experiences related to the negative consequences of complications in farming aquaculture will lead to a detraction of profitability from an aquaculture farming operation.
It becomes apparent that the introduction of any substance to the RAS and the aquaculture, including aquaculture feed, can be harmful if not monitored closely. Without the ability to monitor aquaculture feed consumption levels, aquaculture may receive an inconsistent, suboptimal amount of feed and therefore experience conditions harmful to aquaculture health and flavor profile. To illustrate this point, aquaculture is typically provided with a particular measurement of feed, but the inability to measure aquaculture feed consumption levels prevents RAS farmers from obtaining valuable information pertaining to the health of aquaculture. For example, if RAS farmers were able to detect excess feed in the RAS water, this information may indicate that aquaculture could be receiving too much feed or may be undereating. Moreover, feeding aquaculture in excess may give rise to aquaculture health and flavor profile issues stemming from aquaculture overconsumption or from unconsumed feed lingering in the water, thereby altering the aquaculture environment by introducing chemicals or oils. On the other hand, if RAS farmers were able to detect a lack of feed in the RAS water, this information may signal that aquaculture could be receiving too little feed such that they are being inadequately nourished. Such information about feed quantity in the RAS water is important because it could provide RAS farmers with valuable information about aquaculture consumption rates and patterns, thereby serving as an indication of aquaculture health. Further, the ability to monitor feed quantity in the RAS water would help ensure that aquaculture achieve the desired size and flavor profile.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages that come with RAS farming, the present invention is directed to a feed consumption monitoring system for measuring the quantity of aquaculture feed particles in the RAS water to determine whether aquaculture is receiving suboptimal amounts of feed. Thus, the present invention relates to detecting and mitigating suboptimal or inconsistent aquaculture feed quantities to ensure a desired flavor profile and maintain the desired size and health of aquaculture produced by a prospective RAS.
In more specific terms, the feed validation system is comprised of a high contrast surface, a camera assembly, and a mount assembly that serves to support the foregoing components of the system. In the preferred embodiment, a software component is utilized as well, and a lighting assembly may be used. The preferred embodiment of the overall system functions by introducing to the high contrast surface a supply of running water containing a quantity of feed particles from an RAS, directed by a flow system with one end in the RAS environment and the other just above the surface of the RAS water and just below the high contrast surface. When such an introduction is made, the high contrast surface is lit by the lighting assembly, which may be a part of or operative through the camera assembly, and the camera assembly captures at least one image of the high contrast surface and water making contact. Optimally, such contact is captured by the camera assembly operating essentially as a video system with a high frame rate to capture many images per second. These images are then transmitted to a software component, which is configured to analyze the images and determine the quantity of feed particles in the supply of running water. This is possible because the particles of feed captured in the at least one image are a representative sample of the entire quantity of feed particles in the RAS environment water. As a result of the analysis, the software component is further capable of determining whether the quantity of feed particles detected is suboptimal. Following the determination of optimality, the software component can signal to an automated feed delivery system (or an RAS farmer) that a change in the quantity of feed delivered to the RAS is desirable. Thus, this system helps RAS farmers monitor and control the quantity of feed particles in the RAS, which can be indicative of aquaculture health, feeding habits, and nutritional needs. This system further helps RAS farmers achieve the desired or optimal size and flavor profile of aquaculture, which is a major, overarching goal in RAS farming.
To describe the preferred embodiment in more detail, and by way of non-limiting example, the mount assembly may be one or more pieces that is secured to or removably retained by the flow system, or a component thereof. For example, the mount assembly may be fixed or removably secured to the pipe or conduit of the flow system protruding out of the RAS water, delivering the supply of running water to the high contrast surface. Furthermore, in the preferred embodiment, the mount assembly serves to support the high contrast surface, camera assembly, and lighting assembly, and allows each of the aforementioned components to be positioned at a vertical, horizontal, or diagonal distance from one another if so desired. By way of non-limiting example, the mount assembly allows for the high contrast surface to be disposed vertically above the camera assembly, while the lighting assembly may be simultaneously disposed beside, within, or vertically above or below the camera assembly. In the preferred embodiment, however, the high contrast surface is disposed vertically above the camera assembly, and the camera assembly is held underwater within the flow system by the mount assembly, with the camera assembly's lens facing upwards at the high contrast surface. The lighting assembly may comprise or form a part of the camera assembly, and/or may be operative through the camera assembly, including the scenario where the lighting assembly simply consists of camera assembly's flash capability. If the lighting assembly is included in the system but is not a part of or operative through the camera assembly, the lighting assembly may be supported by the mount and may be disposed in any desirable position or orientation relative to the high contrast surface and the camera assembly.
The high contrast surface, by way of non-limiting example, may be comprised of a waterproof or water-resistant sheet, such as plastic, acrylic, or some other material or combination of materials, which serve to diffuse light. More specifically, in the preferred embodiment, the high contrast surface diffuses light shined onto it by the lighting assembly such that the feed particle edges have a more pronounced appearance, especially in the at least one image captured by the camera assembly. A distinct appearance of feed particle edges is desirable in these images, so as to prevent the software component from erroneously accounting for water droplets or spots of light as a particle of feed. Further, a distinct appearance of feed particle edges helps to distinguish feed particles from aquaculture waste, as feed particles typically appear cylindrical and more or less uniform whereas the latter is typically longer and irregularly shaped. The high contrast surface is secured or removably retained by the mount assembly in the preferred embodiment, but may itself be secured or removably retained to the flow system, through which the supply of running water is delivered to it.
In the preferred embodiment, there is a flow system comprising a conduit, pipe, or other channel defining a path of fluid flow for the supply of running water. Such a flow system is preferably vertically oriented and disposed to direct the supply of running water into engaging relation with the high contrast surface. In other words, the preferred embodiment has at least one pipe or water flow pathway that has one open end in the RAS environment, and another open end just near the surface of the RAS water. This pipe or pathway directs the supply of running water to come into contact with the high contrast surface, which is maintained by the mount assembly just above the flow system's opening in the preferred embodiment. Additionally, in some embodiments there may also be a filtration system within the flow system or otherwise upstream of the high contrast surface that is disposed in receiving relation to the supply of running water and structured to filter feed particles. Such a filtration system would ideally prevent whole feed pellets from striking the high contrast surface or otherwise disturbing the overall system. However, in another embodiment, the filtration system may be unnecessary or undesirable depending on various factors, such as the analysis of optimality. As mentioned above, in the preferred embodiment, the camera assembly is removably retained by the mount assembly underwater within the flow system facing upwards at and positioned at a desirable vertical distance from the high contrast surface. For production of the clearest image or images possible, the camera assembly is preferably held stationary so as to prevent any undesirable movement.
The camera assembly, which is comprised of a camera and a camera mount in one embodiment, is structured to capture images of the high contrast surface upon the high contrast surface receiving, contacting, or otherwise engaging with the supply of running water. In the preferred embodiment, the lighting assembly is comprised of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and is structured to illuminate the high contrast surface to aid in the camera assembly's production of clear, high-contrast images upon such contact. More specifically, the lighting assembly helps generate high contrast in the images taken by the camera assembly between dark and light areas, the dark areas being the feed particles in the supply of running water. As a result, the software component in the preferred embodiment is less prone to error when analyzing the at least one image and determining the number of feed particles in the representative sample; by extension, the same is less prone to error when calculating or approximating the total number of feed particles in the entire RAS environment. Notably, in some embodiments the camera assembly and/or the lighting assembly may be operative through the software component, with the software component capable commanding the camera assembly to capture an image.
When an image is captured by the camera assembly, it is transmitted to the software component for analysis. Such analysis is determinative of the quantity of feed particles in the supply of running water delivered to the high contrast surface. As mentioned above, the quantity calculated or determined from an image is a representative sample that is indicative of the total feed particles in the RAS environment's water. The software component's analysis is further capable of determining whether the quantity of feed particles in the supply of running water is suboptimal. In one embodiment, an RAS farmer can input target feed particle values into the software component to aid in the software component's determination of optimality. In the event the feed particle quantity is found to be suboptimal, the software component of the preferred embodiment is configured to notify a feed delivery system of the undesirable condition. The feed delivery system may then alter the feed delivery quantity to the RAS environment, with the aim of rectifying the suboptimal condition. In the preferred embodiment, the feed delivery system may be an automated mechanism disposed in feed delivery relation to the environment. On the other hand, in another embodiment an RAS farmer may simply take the information from the software component's analysis and rectify the suboptimal condition by manually altering the feed quantity delivered, the delivery mechanism being a non-automated mechanism.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become clearer when the drawings as well as the detailed description are taken into consideration.
For a fuller understanding of the nature of the present invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
The invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which illustrative embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
The aquaculture system in which aquaculture are raised and farmed can be, and will be, referred to as a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). Turning now descriptively to the figures,
To illustrate the preferred embodiment, the high contrast surface 101 is removably retained by the mount assembly 105 at a vertical distance above the top opening of the flow system 106, which breaches just above the water of the RAS environment 108. Further, the high contrast surface 101 is disposed in receiving relation to the supply of running water 102, which contains a quantity of feed particles and is directed towards the high contrast surface 101 by the flow system 106. In other words, the flow system 106 directs the supply of running water 102 upwards to contact the high contrast surface 101, which, as a result, makes the supply of running water 102 spill over the sides of the flow system 106. Next, in the preferred embodiment the camera assembly 103, which is structured to capture at least one image of the high contrast surface 101, is removably retained by the mount assembly 105 and is positioned at a vertical distance below the high contrast surface 101 underwater within the flow system, as shown in
In addition,
Additional structural and operative features are represented in the embodiment of the feed consumption and monitoring system of
In more specific terms, the camera assembly 103 is disposed within the flow system conduit 106 a sufficient distance from the lip 106′ and the high contrast surface 101 such that the field of view of the camera assembly 103 extends at least 25 mm beyond the outer periphery or lip 106′. Accordingly, the camera assembly 103 is disposed at least 90 mm below the outer peripheral lip 106′ and may be spaced a preferred or predetermined distance of 490 mm from the outer peripheral lip 106′.
Additional structural features present in the embodiment of
Additional structural features of the embodiment of
Although not specifically represented, a funnel may be disposed below the camera assembly 103 and oriented to funnel the upwardly or vertically directed flow water 102′, from supply of running water 102 towards the camera assembly 103 as the flow of water 102′ approaches the camera assembly 103. In addition, portions of the frame like mount 105 and 105′ maybe at least partially covered with a mesh-like material, also not shown.
Since many modifications, variations and changes in detail can be made to the described embodiments of the invention, it is intended that all matters in the foregoing description and shown in the accompanying drawings be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. Thus, the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10034461, | May 21 2015 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE ASA | Systems and methods of intensive recirculating aquaculture |
10131558, | Feb 29 2016 | STREAMLINE INNOVATIONS, INC | Compositions, methods, and/or systems for managing sulfide |
10338631, | May 02 2017 | Clearcorp | System for automated water sample jar testing |
10660315, | Nov 18 2016 | University of South Florida | Scaling-up off-flavor compound degradation using aquaculture reacting canister technology |
10694722, | May 21 2015 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE ASA | Systems and methods of intensive recirculating aquaculture |
10748278, | Jun 18 2012 | SCANLOGX, INC | Organism evaluation system and method of use |
10959411, | Jan 04 2018 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE ASA | Bottom grading apparatuses for aquaculture systems |
11425895, | Mar 05 2020 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | Method for optimization of filtration in an aquaculture system |
11484015, | May 21 2015 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | Systems and methods of intensive recirculating aquaculture |
11596132, | May 21 2015 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | Transfer assembly and system for aquaculture |
11627729, | May 21 2015 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | Transfer assembly and system for aquaculture |
11662291, | Feb 03 2021 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | System and method for feed validation measurement |
11785921, | Jan 04 2018 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | Bottom grading apparatuses for aquaculture systems |
2643481, | |||
3200949, | |||
3771492, | |||
3832720, | |||
4009782, | Sep 26 1975 | Roe, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sorting and counting fish eggs |
4052960, | Oct 02 1975 | Province of British Columbia | Fish rearing system |
4067809, | Jun 12 1975 | Filtering system for fish-farming water | |
4141318, | Jan 05 1977 | DOMSEA FARMS, INC | Fish culture tank |
4225543, | Aug 09 1978 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc | Method for determining the pellet size distribution of a pelletizer and for controlling the output of such pelletizer |
4394259, | Oct 27 1981 | Temco, Inc. | Vacuum pneumatic conveying apparatus and method for transferring food products |
4607595, | Mar 25 1985 | The University of South Florida | Rheotactic shrimp harvester |
4728438, | Dec 27 1985 | UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORP OF CA | Process for reducing the concentration of suspended solids in clarified geothermal brine |
4915059, | May 12 1987 | Fisheries Engineering Research and Development Co., Inc. | Raceway culturing of fish |
4966096, | Aug 04 1988 | ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, L P | Water purification system and apparatus |
5038715, | Apr 14 1989 | Aquaculture system | |
5123195, | Dec 07 1990 | Jerry D., Hawkins, Jr.; Sheryl A., Salinas; Diana L., Adair; HAWKINS, JERRY D , JR ; SALINAS, SHERYL A ; ADAIR, DIANA L | Method and apparatus for separating targeted species of aquatic life |
5186121, | Oct 31 1991 | Method of and apparatus for use in the depuration of bivalves | |
5317645, | Feb 28 1991 | SILVER POINT FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT | Method and apparatus for the recognition and counting of discrete objects |
5385428, | Jun 22 1992 | ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, A DC CORP | Water intake fish diversion apparatus |
5540521, | Aug 25 1994 | Inflatable cushion for culturing and movement of aquatic organisms | |
5659977, | Apr 29 1996 | Cyanotech Corporation | Integrated microalgae production and electricity cogeneration |
5732654, | Oct 17 1996 | FIRST REPUBLIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC , THE; FIRST REPUBLIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, THE | Open air mariculture system and method of culturing marine animals |
5823142, | Jul 22 1994 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System; International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | Process for determining excitants, attractants, stimulants and incitants for members of the class crustacea; method for exciting and/or attracting and/or stimulating and/or inciting members of the class crustacea and feeding compositions |
5961831, | Jun 24 1996 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Automated closed recirculating aquaculture filtration system and method |
5978315, | Nov 10 1994 | Akva AS | Feed waste detector |
5979362, | Mar 18 1999 | Aquaculture system | |
6000362, | Nov 24 1995 | Aquasmart Pty Ltd | Feeding system for cultured species |
6041738, | Jun 20 1997 | Fun Fishing LLC. | Fish pond methods and systems |
6065430, | Oct 10 1997 | VBF IP INC | Fish culturing system |
6099879, | Nov 12 1998 | Kalamazoo Holdings, Inc. | Method for preventing off-flavor development and preserving seasoning flavor in irradiated meat and meat products |
6206612, | Mar 18 1999 | Apparatus for preventing contamination of a fresh water source by grey water to be land applied | |
6317385, | Aug 07 1999 | Instituto Fomento Pesquero | Aquaculture feeding monitor |
6382134, | Jul 30 1996 | Jifas Corporation; Hitachi Metals, Ltd. | Fish rearing system |
6443098, | Nov 24 1995 | Silicon Image, Inc | Feeding system for cultured species |
6447681, | Aug 07 2000 | KENT SEA TECH CORPORATION A CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA | Aquaculture wastewater treatment system and method of making same |
6474264, | Aug 18 1999 | L AIR LIQUIDE-SOCIETE ANONYME A DIRECTOIRE ET CONSEIL DE SURVEILLANCE POUR L ETUDE ET L EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE | Method of improving fish breeding conditions operating in ozonated water |
6499431, | Dec 21 2001 | Formosa High-Tech Aquaculture, Inc. | Indoor automatic aquaculture system |
6722314, | May 25 1999 | L'Air Liquide Societe Anonyme a Directoire et Conseil de Surveillance pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude | Method for improving conditions in closed circuit fish farming |
6902675, | Oct 19 2001 | Mississippi State University | Method to control off-flavor in water and aquaculture products |
6932025, | Nov 17 2003 | Kent Sea Tech Corporation | Scalable fish rearing raceway system |
6986323, | Nov 25 2002 | ALGAE BIOSCIENCES INC | Inland aquaculture of marine life using water from a saline aquifer |
6988394, | Feb 03 2003 | ARMY, UNITED STATES | Apparatus and method of portable automated biomonitoring of water quality |
7001519, | Feb 07 2002 | Greenfish AB | Integrated closed loop system for industrial water purification |
7082893, | Apr 03 2003 | University of Maryland Baltimore County | Aquaculture nitrogen waste removal |
7462284, | Jan 30 2004 | University of Maryland Baltimore County | Dissimilatory sulfate reduction as a process to promote denitrification in marine recirculating aquaculture systems |
7594779, | Mar 15 2002 | FARMER S IRRIGATION DISTRICT | Bottom fed screened water diversion apparatus |
7736509, | Jan 24 2007 | Probiotic system and aquaculture devices | |
8117992, | Aug 22 2007 | DRP + LAP ENTERPRISES LLC | Aquatic farming systems |
8141515, | Apr 22 2009 | Method of aquaculture | |
8506811, | Mar 01 2007 | Bradley Innovation Group, LLC | Process and system for growing crustaceans and other fish |
8535883, | Sep 17 2008 | Brown University | Methods of detecting sources of microorganism contamination |
8633011, | Mar 18 2009 | Palmer Labs, LLC | Biomass production and processing and methods of use thereof |
9637402, | Apr 23 2007 | University of Maryland Baltimore County | Methods for the conversion of fish waste from aquaculture systems to methane via a modified UASB reactor |
9756838, | Mar 31 2014 | Kitz Corporation | Circulation type aquaculture method and circulation type aquaculture device |
20030059494, | |||
20030070624, | |||
20030104353, | |||
20030121859, | |||
20040168648, | |||
20040244715, | |||
20050211644, | |||
20060055934, | |||
20070221552, | |||
20070242134, | |||
20080000821, | |||
20080223788, | |||
20090145368, | |||
20090250010, | |||
20100081961, | |||
20100092431, | |||
20100236137, | |||
20100269761, | |||
20110046603, | |||
20110060533, | |||
20110168616, | |||
20110250604, | |||
20110258915, | |||
20120103271, | |||
20120125940, | |||
20120184001, | |||
20130098303, | |||
20130273599, | |||
20130319342, | |||
20130327709, | |||
20140261213, | |||
20140293040, | |||
20150167045, | |||
20150230439, | |||
20150250113, | |||
20150256747, | |||
20150342161, | |||
20150347817, | |||
20150366173, | |||
20160356756, | |||
20170260546, | |||
20170299382, | |||
20180125041, | |||
20190008126, | |||
20190071336, | |||
20190082661, | |||
20190135393, | |||
20190141964, | |||
20190169046, | |||
20190200584, | |||
20200396970, | |||
20210127646, | |||
20210137082, | |||
20210195874, | |||
20210227807, | |||
20210235010, | |||
20210274758, | |||
20210275604, | |||
20210278378, | |||
CA2711677, | |||
CN102329055, | |||
DM205963, | |||
GB2464686, | |||
JP1112935, | |||
WO17153986, | |||
WO200241703, | |||
WO2006042371, | |||
WO2008094132, | |||
WO2016154602, | |||
WO2017002081, | |||
WO2018169412, | |||
WO2018184029, | |||
WO2021150873, | |||
WO2021162847, | |||
WO2021178080, | |||
WO2021178431, | |||
WO2021216225, | |||
WO2021221745, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 15 2021 | HOLM, THUE | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 059446 | /0114 | |
Apr 04 2022 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP, LLC | DNB BANK ASA, NEW YORK BRANCH, IN ITS CAPACITY AS COLLATERAL AGENT FOR THE SECURED PARTIES | SECURITY INTEREST AND CONTINUING LIEN | 059659 | /0929 | |
Apr 04 2022 | ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE ASA | DNB BANK ASA, NEW YORK BRANCH, IN ITS CAPACITY AS COLLATERAL AGENT FOR THE SECURED PARTIES | SECURITY INTEREST AND CONTINUING LIEN | 059659 | /0929 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 24 2022 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Mar 01 2022 | SMAL: Entity status set to Small. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 15 2027 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 15 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 15 2028 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 15 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 15 2031 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 15 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 15 2032 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 15 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 15 2035 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 15 2036 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 15 2036 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 15 2038 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |