A driving speed of a vehicle is limited when driving around a bend. A course of a curve of a route portion lying ahead of the vehicle is determined using a digital map. Depending on the course of the curve and on physical load limits of the vehicle, a course of a permissible bend speed is determined. The vehicle is controlled such that the determined permissible bend speeds are not exceeded when driving around the bend. By evaluating the course of the curve, a route portion, in which the curve is greater than a pre-determined curve limit value, is identified as a bend portion. Local curve maxima are identified in the identified bend portion. A permissible bend speed is determined for each local curve maximum depending on the curve and on a permissible lateral acceleration.

Patent
   12139138
Priority
Jul 27 2021
Filed
Jun 22 2022
Issued
Nov 12 2024
Expiry
Jun 22 2042
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
30
currently ok
1. A method for limiting a driving speed of a vehicle when driving around a bend, the method comprising:
determining a course of a curve of a route portion lying ahead of the vehicle;
determining, based on the course of the curve and on physical load limits of the vehicle, a course of a permissible bend speed; and
controlling the vehicle such that the determined permissible bend speeds are not exceeded when driving around the bend,
wherein, by evaluating the course of the curve, a route portion, in which the curve is greater than a pre-determined curve limit value, is identified as a bend portion,
wherein local curve maxima are identified in the identified bend portion, and
wherein, when several local curve maxima are identified in the bend portion, a permissible bend speed is determined for each local curve maximum depending on the curve and on a permissible lateral acceleration.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the permissible lateral acceleration is predetermined depending on the curve.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the permissible lateral acceleration is predetermined as a characteristic curve or look-up table depending on the curve.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the identified bend portion is sub-divided into several bend sections bordering each other, wherein borders between neighbouring bend sections are formed by the local curve maxima.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein deviations between the permissible bend speeds at the beginning and end of a respective bend section are determined, wherein if the determined deviation exceeds a predetermined speed threshold, at least one further permissible bend speed is determined by interpolation in the respective bend section based on the permissible bend speeds at the beginning and end of the respective bend section.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the interpolation is a linear interpolation.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein a number of determined further permissible bend speeds is selected to be larger the larger the determined deviation between the permissible bend speeds at the start and at the end of the respective bend section.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein a respective position relative to the at least one further permissible bend speed is determined by determining an associated curve and determining an exact position of an additional speed limit via linear interpolation between two curve values.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein a characteristic curve or look-up table is used to determine the permissible lateral acceleration depending on the speed.
10. The method of claim 5, wherein a follow-up investigation is performed as to whether the additional speed limit is necessary based on an acceleration process, wherein the additional speed limit is not required if acceleration required to reach the speed limit at a following curve maximum exceeds an adjustable acceleration limit which predetermined.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention relate to a method for limiting a driving speed of a vehicle when driving around a bend.

There are many approaches in the literature for determining optimal positions of recommended speeds when driving around bends, which however reflect reality poorly or insufficiently. Frequently, a complex bend course with only a single speed limit is considered. Consequently, the automated and predictive driving speed control system will frequently adjust the speed at the wrong time (or at the wrong position) when driving around bends.

DE 10 2006 006 365 A1 describes a device and a method for controlling the longitudinal movement of a vehicle, in which environment data and/or route data is recorded and is used as a basis to influence the vehicle on a route depending on its position. A curve course of the route and a maximum speed profile dependent thereon are determined in advance, the maximum speed profile is corrected in order to match physical load limits of the vehicle, and a speed limit is imposed on the basis of the corrected maximum speed profile.

DE 10 2009 023 489 A1 describes a method and a device for controlling the speed of a vehicle. Using digital map data, a maximum speed profile dependent on the route portion lying ahead is determined. Furthermore, the speed of the vehicle is limited depending on the determined maximum speed profile, such that a pre-determined limit speed is not fallen short of, even if the latter is greater than a speed of the maximum speed profile.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention are directed to an improved method for limiting a driving speed of a vehicle when driving around a bend.

In a method according to the invention for limiting a driving speed of a vehicle when driving around a bend, a course of a curve of a route portion lying ahead of the vehicle is determined, in particular by means of a digital map and/or using data of a sensor for recording the environment, wherein depending on the course of the curve and on physical load limits of the vehicle, a course of a permissible bend speed is determined, and the vehicle is controlled such that the determined permissible bend speeds are not exceeded when driving around the bend. According to the invention, by evaluating the course of the curve, a route portion in which the curve is larger than a pre-determined curve limit is identified as a bend portion, wherein local curve maxima are identified in the identified bend portion, and wherein when several local curve maxima are identified in the bend portion, a permissible bend speed is determined for each local curve maximum depending on the curve and on a permissible lateral acceleration.

The invention presently described sets the relevant bend speed at the relevant position within the bend and, if necessary, also several speed limits. Speed control systems can thus function precisely and reliably.

In one embodiment, the permissible lateral acceleration is pre-determined depending on the curve, in particular as a characteristic curve or look-up table.

In one embodiment, the identified bend portion is sub-divided into several bend sections bordering each other, wherein borders are formed between neighboring bend sections by the local curve maxima.

In one embodiment, deviations between the permissible bend speeds at the beginning and end of a respective bend section are determined, wherein if the determined deviation exceeds a pre-determined speed threshold, at least one further permissible bend speed is determined by interpolation, in particular by linear interpolation, in the respective bend section on the basis of the permissible bend speeds at the beginning and end of the respective bend section.

In one embodiment, a number of determined further permissible bend speeds is selected to be larger the larger the determined deviation between the permissible bend speeds at the start and at the end of the respective bend section.

In one embodiment, a respective position relative to the at least one further permissible bend speed is determined by determining the associated curve and determining an exact position of the additional speed limit via linear interpolation between two curve values.

In one embodiment, a characteristic curve or look-up table is used to determine the permissible lateral acceleration depending on the speed.

In one embodiment, a follow-up investigation is carried out for the necessity of the additional speed limit on the basis of the acceleration process, wherein the additional speed limit is not required if the acceleration required to reach the speed limit at a following curve maximum exceeds an adjustable acceleration limit which is or can be pre-determined.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained in more detail in the following with reference to drawings.

Here:

FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a bend,

FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of the bend, which is divided into bend sections,

FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of a characteristic curve of a permissible lateral acceleration depending on a bend curve,

FIG. 4 shows a schematic view of a bend, which is divided into bend sections, and

FIG. 5 shows a schematic view of a characteristic curve of a permissible lateral acceleration depending on a speed.

Parts corresponding to one another are provided with the same reference numerals in all Figures.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention relate to a method for limiting a driving speed of a vehicle when driving around a bend K.

According to the invention, a curve course of a route portion ahead of the vehicle is determined, in particular using a digital map. By evaluating the curve course, a road portion, in which a curve κ, also described as a bend curve κ, is greater than a pre-determined curve limit value κlim, is identified as a bend portion. Curve κ is here understood to mean the magnitude of the curve, i.e., any sign specifying the direction of the curve, and thus specifies whether the curve is a curve to the left or to the right, is not taken into account. Local curve maxima, k2, k6, k8, k12 are identified in the identified bend portion. For each local maximum, a permissible bend speed v is determined depending on the curve κ and depending on a permissible lateral acceleration. The vehicle is controlled such that the determined permissible bend speeds v are not exceeded when driving around the bend K.

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a bend K.

The bend K is, for example, divided into regions k1 to k16, with a bend entry KE and a bend exit KA, which have a curve κ greater than a curve threshold κlim in a curve direction. In FIG. 1, the bend entry KE is the region k0 ahead of a bend K with a smaller curve κ than the curve threshold κlim. In FIG. 1, the bend exit KA is the region k14 after the bend K with a smaller curve κ than the curve threshold κlim.

FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the bend K, which is divided into bend sections KS1 to KS5.

Between the bend entry KE and the bend exit KA, the bend K can be further divided into bend sections KS1 to KS5, which respectively have a section beginning and a section end.

A start section KS1 begins at the bend entry KE, in FIG. 2 the region k0, and extends up to a following bend curve maximum, in FIG. 2 the region k2. An end section KS5 ends at the bend exit, in FIG. 2 the region k14, and begins at the last bend curve maximum, in FIG. 2 the region k12.

One or more middle sections KS2 to KS4 can be located between the start section KS1 and the end section KS5. The middle sections KS2 to KS4 respectively begin at a bend curve maximum, in FIG. 2 respectively at the region k2, k6 and k8, and extend up to a following bend curve maximum, in FIG. 2 the regions k6, k8 and k12.

In other embodiments, another number of bend sections KS1 to KSn can be provided.

Several bend sections KS1 to KSn can thus be created in the same direction.

In one embodiment, the bend entry KE is not given a speed limit vzul.

The first speed limit within the first bend section KS1 (regions k0 to k2) can be located at the position of the first curve maximum (region k2) or at a position of additional speed limits vzul.

Within a bend section KS1 to Ksn, at least one curve maximum, but a maximum of two curve maxima, can be contained.

The speed limits vper can be determined based on the following formula correlation at all curve maxima:

v p e r [ km / h ] = 3.6 · a l a t p e r ( κ ) · 1 κ ( 1 )

A permissible lateral acceleration αlatper(κ) can be made available as a characteristic curve KL1 depending on a bend curve κ.

FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the characteristic curve KL1.

Within the characteristic curve KL1, linear interpolation is possible between its grid points.

For example, the characteristic curve KL1 can have the following grid points:

κ [ 1 m ] a l a t p e r ( κ ) [ m s 2 ]
1 5
0.1 5
0.06 4.9
0.05 4.6
0.03 4.3
0.025 4.1
0.02 4
0.013 3.7
0.01 3.5
0.006 3.3
0.005 3.25
0.003 3.2
0.0025 3.2
0.002 3.2

The speed limits vper at the curve maxima can be determined as follows.

If the bend section KS1 to KSn in question begins with a curve maximum, then any following curve maximum should be omitted if the required acceleration falls short of an adjustable limit which is or can be pre-determined (i.e., the speed limit vzul of the following maximum is close to the previous maximum in terms of magnitude).

The speed limit vper of the following maximum is not required if:

a l o n g = v i + v i + 1 2 · "\[LeftBracketingBar]" v i + 1 - v i "\[RightBracketingBar]" Δ s a l o n g < a L i m i t 1 ( 2 )

The speed limits vper (position of the legal speed limit vlegal) at the bend exit KA is determined as follows:

If the bend section KS1 to KSn in question ends with the bend end KE (i.e., the curve κ falls short of an adjustable curve limit which is or can be pre-determined), then the position before the bend end KE is determined at which the curve κ corresponds to the current speed limit vper. This position is the desired bend end KE. The position is calculated according to:

Δ s = f ( κ ) ; ( 3 ) κ = f ( v l e g a l ) ( 4 )

The connection between the bend curve κ and the legal speed limit vlegal can be stored in a characteristic curve or look-up table.

κ = a l a t p e r ( v legal ) ( ν legal 3.6 ) 2 ( 5 )

The connection between the permissible lateral acceleration αlatper and the legal speed limit vlegal can be stored in a characteristic curve or look-up table.

Δ s = s i + 1 - s i · κ - κ i κ i + 1 - κ i ( 6 ) s = s i + Δ s ( 7 )
vlegal legal speed limit

For example,

Δ s = s 1 4 - s 1 3 · κ - κ 1 3 κ 1 4 - κ 1 3 ( 8 )
applies.

The bend end KE is characterized in the application, for example with the highest value, for example 255, of a range of numbers of a particular bit width, for example 8 bits, which can denote a state in which no data is available. The legal speed limit vlegal can only be driven at again at the bend end KE.

The calculation of additional speed limits can be carried out within individual bend sections KS1 to KSn as follows:

An absolute speed difference Δv between the beginning of the bend section and the end of the bend section is taken into account, and is compared with speed difference parameters vP1, vP2.

Δ v 2 .

Δ v 3 and 2 Δ v 3 .

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a bend K, which is divided into bend sections KS1 to KS3.

A start section KS1 begins at the bend entry KE, in FIG. 4 the region k0, and extends up to a following bend curve maximum, in FIG. 4 the region k8. An end section KS3 ends at the bend exit KA, in FIG. 4 the region k14, and begins at the last bend curve maximum, in FIG. 4 the region k12.

A middle section KS2 is located between the start section KS1 and the end section KS3. The middle section KS2 begins at a bend curve maximum, in FIG. 4 at the region k8, and extends up to a following bend curve maximum, in FIG. 4 the region k12. At the beginning of the start section KS1, a speed limit of 100 km/h is set. At the end of the start section KS1, a speed limit of 67 km/h is set. The absolute speed difference Δv between the beginning of the start section KS1 and the end of the start section KS1 is 33 km/h. In the example shown, the speed difference parameters vP1, vP2 are set as follows:

v P 2 = 30 km / h , v P 1 = 20 km / h .

A first additional speed limit is then vACS1=100−33/3=89 km/h. A second additional speed limit is vACS2=100−2*33/3=78 km/h.

Furthermore, the associated positions can be determined relative to the additional speed limits. For this purpose, the associated bend curves can be determined relative to the additional speed limits.

The exact position of the additional speed limit is, for example, determined by linear interpolation between two curve values. A characteristic curve for determining the permissible lateral acceleration αlatper depending on the speed v can be used.

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of the characteristic curve KL2.

For example, the characteristic curve KL2 can have the following grid points:

v [ k m h ] a l a t p e r [ m s 2 ]
8 5
25 5
30.9 4.9
34.5 4.6
40.9 4.3
46.1 4.1
50.9 4
60 3.7
67.3 3.5
80 3.3
91.8 3.25
111.5 3.2
128.8 3.2
144 3.2

κ = a lat p e r ( v _ ) ( v ¯ 3.6 ) 2 with v _ = ( v i + 1 + v i ) / 2 ( 9 ) Δ s = f ( κ ) ; κ = characteristic curve ( Δ v 3 or 2 Δ v 3 ) ( 10 ) Δ s = s i + 1 - s i · κ - κ i κ i + 1 - κ i ( 11 ) s = s i + Δ s ( 12 )
v average speed

A subsequent investigation of the necessity for the additional speed limit can take place on the basis of the acceleration process. The additional speed limit is not required, for example, if the acceleration required to reach the speed limit vper at the following curve maximum exceeds an adjustable acceleration limit which is or can be pre-determined (i.e., the additional speed limit differs too much from the following maximum, and is thus obsolete).

The additional speed limit is not required, for example, if the following applies:

a l o n g = v i + v i + 1 2 · "\[LeftBracketingBar]" v i + 1 - v i "\[RightBracketingBar]" Δ s ( 13 ) a l o n g > a L i m i t 2 ( 14 )
αLimit2 limit of the acceleration

The limits of the acceleration αLimit1 and αLimit2 can be pre-determined such that they are different or the same.

Although the invention has been illustrated and described in detail by way of preferred embodiments, the invention is not limited by the examples disclosed, and other variations can be derived from these by the person skilled in the art without leaving the scope of the invention. It is therefore clear that there is a plurality of possible variations. It is also clear that embodiments stated by way of example are only really examples that are not to be seen as limiting the scope, application possibilities or configuration of the invention in any way. In fact, the preceding description and the description of the figures enable the person skilled in the art to implement the exemplary embodiments in concrete manner, wherein, with the knowledge of the disclosed inventive concept, the person skilled in the art is able to undertake various changes, for example, with regard to the functioning or arrangement of individual elements stated in an exemplary embodiment without leaving the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims and their legal equivalents, such as further explanations in the description.

Raab, Wolfgang, Schlutter, Matthias, Bott, Thiemo, Görke, Daniel, Knödler, Philipp, Streiter, Stephanie, Sylla, Annette, Voigtländer, Ruben

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
10611366, Oct 13 2015 KNORR-BREMSE SYSTEME FUER NUTZFAHRZEUGE GMBH Method for predictive rollover prevention of a vehicle
6141617, Apr 09 1997 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle control apparatus
6212465, Dec 22 1999 SEESAW FOUNDATION Method and system for controlling vehicle speed based on vehicle yaw rate and yaw acceleration
9885578, Apr 19 2013 Denso Corporation Curve-shape modeling device, vehicle information processing system, curve-shape modeling method, and non-transitory tangible computer readable medium for the same
20050240334,
20150151756,
20160096430,
20200139971,
20200180617,
20200346659,
20200385005,
20200385007,
20210114620,
20210245733,
20220009487,
AT520320,
DE102004040351,
DE102006006365,
DE102009000397,
DE102009023489,
DE102011006741,
DE102015013143,
DE102016216156,
DE102018210495,
DE102018222227,
DE102019200541,
DE112014002019,
DE19816133,
JP10269495,
WO2015178839,
/////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jun 22 2022Mercedes-Benz Group AG(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jan 10 2024VOIGTLÄNDER, RUBENMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Jan 11 2024SCHLUTTER, MATTHIASMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Jan 17 2024BOTT, THIEMOMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Jan 19 2024STREITER, STEPHANIEMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Jan 19 2024SYLLA, ANNETTEMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Jan 22 2024RAAB, WOLFGANGMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Feb 12 2024GÖRKE, DANIELMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Feb 18 2024KNÖDLER, PHILIPPMercedes-Benz Group AGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0671150400 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 26 2024BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).


Date Maintenance Schedule
Nov 12 20274 years fee payment window open
May 12 20286 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 12 2028patent expiry (for year 4)
Nov 12 20302 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Nov 12 20318 years fee payment window open
May 12 20326 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 12 2032patent expiry (for year 8)
Nov 12 20342 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Nov 12 203512 years fee payment window open
May 12 20366 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 12 2036patent expiry (for year 12)
Nov 12 20382 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)