A hole punch having a curved cutting edge of generally the same contour as the surface being punched produces clean holes in wall of foamed plastic containers.

Patent
   3996832
Priority
Apr 10 1975
Filed
Apr 10 1975
Issued
Dec 14 1976
Expiry
Apr 10 1995
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
11
5
EXPIRED
1. A hole punch for use in the production of foamed thermoplastic containers comprising a generally concave blade edge with a reverse curvature near each edge of the blade, said blade edge having generally the same contour as the surface into which it is punched.

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to the apparatus and method for punching holes in foamed plastic containers. More particularly, it relates to the shape of the cutting edge of the hole punch.

2. Description of the Prior Art

Hole punches as used in the prior art for the purpose of punching holes in foamed plastic containers commonly have cutting blades which are straight. Such a blade is adequate for most purposes where the surface to be punched is a flat surface. However, when such straight blades are used to punch holes in curved surfaces, the result is frequently unsatisfactory, resulting in a hole or slot having ragged and torn edges instead of clean, sharp edges. This probably results from the entire blade failing to contact the surface at the same time, thus creating uneven stresses in the uncut portion of the surface which gives rise to rips and tears.

Accordingly, an object of this invention is to provide a method for producing clean holes in curved surfaces of foamed plastic containers.

A further object of this invention is to provide a new and useful hole punch.

In one aspect, the invention broadly resides in a hole punch for use in the production of foamed thermoplastic containers, said hole punch comprising a curved blade edge with a contour substantially the same as that of the surface to be punched.

More specifically, the blade edge can be generally concave in shape and have a reverse curvature at both ends of the blade edge.

In a further aspect, the invention resides in a method for punching holes in curved foamed thermoplastic surfaces which comprises positioning the foamed surface between a punch and a die, said punch having a blade edge with substantially the same contour as the foamed surface and said die having substantially the same contour as the backside of said surface and also having a hole adapted to receive the punch, and thrusting the punch through said surface into the die hole, whereby a clean hole or slot is created in said surface.

FIG. 1 is a view of the hole punching apparatus viewed from along the line of travel of the containers being punched.

FIG. 2 is a plan view of a preferred hole punch.

FIG. 3 is a fragmentary elevational view of the punch shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is an end view of the punch shown in FIG. 2.

Directing attention to the drawing, our invention will be described in more detail.

FIG. 1 is a view of the hole punching apparatus viewed from along the line of travel of the foamed thermoformed plastic containers which are to be punched. The means for closing these particular containers required a slot to be punched out of a sidewall having an outwardly protruding surface. This closure means is described in a copending application bearing Ser. No. 525,390 filed Nov. 20, 1974, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,935,962, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Shown are two hinged containers 1 and 2, traveling "open side down" and out of the plane of the paper. Both containers are punched simultaneously, although the two punches 3 are shown both in an extended and retracted position for purposes of illustration. As the containers are advanced into proper position, the pneumatic cylinders 4 thrust the punches 3 through the surface to be punched 5 and into the die plate 6, producing a hole or slot in the container wall. The punched material is forced through the die into a hollow chamber 7 which is connected to a vacuum in order to remove all the scraps. The punches are then pneumatically retracted as the containers are advanced and the process is repeated. Also shown are a support 8 for the advancing containers and a punch guide 9.

FIG. 2 is a plan view of a preferred punch as used in the process of FIG. 1 for punching slots in outwardly protruding surfaces of foamed thermoformed containers. Shown is the blade edge 11, the ends 12 of the blade edge, a reduced portion 13 of the shaft 14, and a hole 15 which provides a means of attaching the punch to the pneumatic cylinders. The overall dimensions of the punch are about 6.4 inches in length, 1.5 inches in width, and 0.25 inch in depth. The reduced portion 13 of the shaft has been machined down to provide a better fit into the punch die. The generally concave blade edge 11 has a radius of curvature of 0.875 inch measured at the center of the blade edge. Toward the ends of the blade edge, a reverse curvature is provided to more closely conform to the contour of the surface to be punched. The reverse curvatures also have a radius of curvature of 0.875 inch.

FIG. 3 is a fragmentary elevational view of the punch shown in FIG. 2. Shown is the side of the shaft 14, the reduced portion 13 of the shaft, and the end 12 of the blade edge. This view illustrates the extent to which the reduced portion of the shaft has been machined down.

FIG. 4 is an end view looking at the blade edge. Shown is the shaft 14, the blade edge 11, and the rounded corners of the reduced portion of the shaft.

In using the particular punch and die herein described in the preferred embodiment, two other factors were found to have an effect on the quality of the slot. In particular, best results were achieved when the surface to be punched had a wall thickness greater than 0.08 inch and a foamed cell structure consisting of cells having a generally round shape with an average diameter of at least 0.006 inch, although a wall thickness as thin as 0.045 inch could be used. Preferred upper limits for the wall thickness and cell diameter would be about 0.4 inch and 0.015 inch, respectively. It is important to note that the effect of these factors is dependent upon the closeness of the fit between the punch and die, which in the preferred embodiment has a clearance of about 0.003 to 0.004 inch on each side of the punch. A different clearance would correspondingly change the preferred ranges of the wall thickness and cell diameter, which could easily be optimized with the aid of the broad teachings of this invention.

Accordingly, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that many variations may be made from the preferred embodiment chosen for purposes of illustration without departing from the scope of this invention.

Schubert, John C., Case, Charles B.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10179421, May 14 2015 OMNITOOL, INC Rigid punch tool
10710140, Mar 10 2010 Stolle Machinery Company, LLC Tooling assembly, blanking tool therefor and associated method
10926487, Mar 07 2017 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Press forming method and press forming apparatus for formed film of solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell
4296659, Sep 21 1979 PUMPKIN LTD Jack-O-Lantern forming method
4970926, Sep 17 1987 Neurodynamics, Inc. Apparatus for making angled hole ventricular catheter
5007316, Dec 19 1986 General Electric Company Apparatus for cutting sheet materials
5052207, Jul 26 1989 CMB Foodcan plc Apparatus for, and a method of, cutting a blank
5211687, Dec 04 1991 Herman Miller, Inc. Apparatus and method for producing a hole in an article of wood or wood product
5443195, Sep 30 1993 KARL MARBACH BMBH CO Device for removing knockouts, such as scrap, from a sheet of material containing blanks or similar
5753158, Oct 02 1992 Method for manufacturing aspirators for medical and dental use
7624536, Apr 27 2006 Landmark Plastic Corporation Container with plant identification tag slot
Patent Priority Assignee Title
1895589,
2781843,
2829983,
3772946,
3848497,
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 10 1975Standard Oil Company (Indiana)(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events


Date Maintenance Schedule
Dec 14 19794 years fee payment window open
Jun 14 19806 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 14 1980patent expiry (for year 4)
Dec 14 19822 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Dec 14 19838 years fee payment window open
Jun 14 19846 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 14 1984patent expiry (for year 8)
Dec 14 19862 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Dec 14 198712 years fee payment window open
Jun 14 19886 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 14 1988patent expiry (for year 12)
Dec 14 19902 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)