electrochemical power cells having a lithium anode, a carbonatious current collector, and thionyl chloride active cathode depolarizer and electrolyte solvent are enhanced by adding copper thereto.
|
1. An electrochemical cell consisting essentially of a lithium anode; a carbonaceous current collector spaced from said anode; an ionically conductive electrolyte solution comprising an ionically conductive solute dissolved in thionyl chloride; and copper dispersed in said carbonaceous current collector.
5. An electrochemical cell comprising an anode, selected from the group consisting of lithium and calcium, a current collector spaced from said anode and comprising a porous body including intimately dispersed particles of copper and carbon, and an electrolyte solution disposed between said current collector and anode including a cathode depolarizer comprising thionyl chloride.
8. An electrochemical cell comprising:
an anode selected from the group consisting of lithium and calcium; a carbonaceous current collector spaced from said anode; an ionically conductive electrolyte solution in intimate contact with said current collector and said anode, said electrolyte comprising an ionically conductive solute dissolved in an active cathode depolarizer selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following: phosphoryl chloride, thionyl chloride or sulfuryl chloride; an additive consisting primarily of copper dispersed in said current collector.
7. An electrochemical cell comprising:
an anode selected from the group consisting of lithium and calcium; a carbonaceous current collector spaced from said anode; an ionically conductive electrolyte solution in intimate contact with said current collector and said anode, said electrolyte comprising an ionically conductive solute dissolved in an active cathode depolarizer selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following: phosphoryl chloride, thionyl chloride and sulfuryl chloride; an additive consisting primarily of copper dispersed in said current collector.
2. The electrochemical cell of
3. The electrochemical cell of
4. The electrochemical cell of
9. The electrochemical cell of
11. The electrochemical cell of
12. The electrochemical cell of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 828,493 filed Aug. 29, 1977 now abandoned.
This invention relates to high energy electrochemical power cells. More particularly, it relates to cells having an oxidizable anode material and a liquid active cathode material and a solid current collector.
Recently there has been a rapid growth in portable electronic products requiring electrochemical cells to supply the energy. Examples are calculators, cameras and digital watches. These products, however, have highlighted the deficiencies of the existing power cells for demanding applications. For example, digital watches were developed using the silver oxide cell, and although these watches have become popular, it is now generally recognized that the least developed component of the digital watch system is the power cell. In particular, the energy density of the silver cells is such that thin, stylish watches with reasonable operating life are difficult to make. Additionally, these cells have poor storage characteristics, low cell voltages, and leakage problems.
In an effort to develop a cell that addresses one or more of the foregoing problems, substantial work has been done with cell chemistries using a lithium anode. The cathode and electrolyte material consisting of a solvent and solute vary. Indeed the literature is replete with examples of lithium anode cells with different cathodes and electrolytes. The electrical characteristics of these cells such as energy per unit volume, called energy density; cell voltage; and internal impedance vary greatly.
Among all of the known combinations of lithium anodes with different cathodes and electrolytes, those believed to have among the highest energy density and lowest internal impedance use certain inorganic liquids as the active cathode depolarizer. This type of cell chemistry is commonly referred to as "liquid cathode".
Early liquid cathode cells used liquid sulfur dioxide as the active cathode depolarizer as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,567,515 issued to Maricle, et. al. on Mar. 2, 1971. Since sulfur dioxide is not a liquid at room temperature and at atmospheric pressure, it proved to be quite a difficult chemistry with which to work. More importantly, sulfur dioxide cells are unsafe for most consumer applications due to their propensity to explode under certain circumstances.
A major step forward in the development of liquid cathode cells was the discovery of a class of inorganic materials, generally called oxyhalides, that are liquids at room temperature and also perform the function of being the active cathode depolarizer. Additionally, these materials may also be used as the electrolyte solvent. Liquid cathode cells using oxyhalides are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,926,669 issued to Auborn on Dec. 16, 1975, and in British Pat. No. 1,409,307 issued to Blomgren et al. on Oct. 18, 1975. At least one of the oxyhalides, thionyl chloride (SOCl2), in addition to having the general characteristics described above, also provides substantial additional energy density.
As described in the Auborn and Blomgren patents, the anode is lithium metal or alloys of lithium and the electrolyte solution is an ionically conductive solute dissolved in a solvent that is also an active cathode depolarizer.
The solute may be a simple or double salt which will produce an ionically conductive solution when dissolved in the solvent. Preferred solutes are complexes of inorganic or organic Lewis acids and inorganic ionizable salts. The requirements for utility are that the salt, whether simple or complex, be compatible with the solvent being employed and that it yield a solution which is ionically conductive. According to the Lewis or electronic concept of acids and bases, many substances which contain no active hydrogen can act as acids or acceptors or electron doublets. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,542,602 it is suggested that the complex or double salt formed between a Lewis acid and an ionizable salt yields an entity which is more stable that either of the components alone.
Typical Lewis acids suitable for use in the present invention include aluminum chloride, antimony pentachloride, zirconium tetrachloride, phosphorus pentachloride, boron fluoride, boron chloride and boron bromide.
Ionizable salts useful in combination with the Lewis acids include lithium fluoride, lithium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium sulfide, sodium fluoride, sodium chloride, sodium bromide, potassium fluoride, potassium chloride and potassium bromide.
The double salts formed by a Lewis acid and an inorganic ionizable salt may be used as such or the individual components may be added to the solvent separately to form the salt. One such double salt, for example, is that formed by the combination of aluminum chloride and lithium chloride to yield lithium aluminum tetrachloride.
In addition to an anode, active cathode depolarizer and ionically conductive electrolyte, these cells require a current collector.
According to Blomgren, any compatible solid, which is substantially electrically conductive and inert in the cell, will be useful as a cathode collector since the function of the collector is to permit external electrical contact to be made with the active cathode material. It is desirable to have as much surface contact as possible between the liquid cathode and the current collector. Therefore, a porous material is preferred since it will provide a high surface area interface with the liquid cathode material. The current collector may be metallic and may be present in any physical form such as metallic film, screen or a pressed powder. Examples of some suitable metal current collectors are provided in Table II of the Auborn Patent. The current collector may also be made partly or completely of carbon. Examples provided in the Blomgren Patent use graphite.
Electrical separation of current collector and anode is required to insure that cathode or anode reactions do not occur unless electrical current flows through an external circuit. Since the current collector is insoluble in the electrolyte and the anode does not react spontaneously with the electrolyte, a mechanical separator may be used. Materials useful for this function are described in the Auborn Patent.
Although the varied cells described in the Blomgren and Auborn patents may be feasible, much of the recent interest is in cells using thionyl chloride as the active cathode depolarizer and electrolyte solvent. This results from thionyl chloride's apparent ability to provide greater energy density and current delivery capability than other oxyhalide systems. Yet even though thionyl chloride cells have proven to be the best performer among the oxyhalides, they have not lived up to expectations on energy density or internal impedance. Furthermore, the thionyl chloride cell is equally if not more dangerous than the sulfur dioxide cell. As a result, all known efforts to commercialize cells using this chemistry have failed.
The present invention is based on the discovery that a substantially safer lithium or calcium anode, thionyl chloride active cathode depolarizer cell with the added benefits of higher energy density and lower internal impedance can be made by adding copper to the cell.
Thus, it is an object of this invention to provide an improvement to the known lithium/thionyl chloride cell that renders the cell safer.
It is another object to provide a lithium/thionyl chloride cell having higher energy densities than those reported in the literature.
Finally, it is the object of this invention to provide a lithium/thionyl chloride cell with low internal impedance.
These and other objects of the invention may be achieved by an electrochemical cell comprising an alkalimetal anode, a current collector spaced from said anode and comprising a porous body of carbon in which particulate copper has been dispersed and an electrolyte solution in chemical and electrical contact with both the current collector and anode, said electrolyte solution comprising an ionically conductive solute dissolved in an active cathode depolarizer solvent selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following: phosphoryl chloride, sulphuryl chloride, and thionyl chloride.
As mentioned previously, the basis of this invention is the discovery that the addition of elemental copper to the cell provides substantial improvements in both performance and safety. While the theoretical explanation of this phenomenon is not clear, and applicant does not intend to be limited to any theory of invention, at least one explanation of the results involves a reaction with the copper and elemental sulfur. Some of the several different reactions that could occur in the prior art cells (there is no conclusive evidence as to which reaction or reactions actually occur) are as follows:
3SOCl2 +8Li Li2 SO3 +6LiCl+2S (1)
4socl2 +8Li Li2 S2 O4 +6LiCl+S2 Cl2(2)
4SOCl2 +8Li 4LiCl+SO2 +S (3)
these reactions all release the same amount of electrical energy. However, equation (1) requires less thionyl chloride. Thus the energy density of this reaction is higher. That is, more electrical energy can be derived from a given volume of chemicals with the reaction of equation (1) than with the reaction of equations (2) or (3).
One possible explanation of the difference in energy of the cell of this invention is that the copper first acts as a catalyst to force the reaction to be a higher energy density reaction such as the reaction of equation (1), and second, combines with the elemental sulfur to form copper sulfide.
The significance of the copper sulfur reaction relates to safety. It is widely believed that the elemental sulfur in contact with lithium will explode above a certain temperature and that this temperature may be easily reached by short circuiting, reverse charging, or other electrical conditions, as well as exposure to high ambient temperatures. However, copper sulfide does not react explosively with lithium at any temperature likely to be experienced by batteries. Experimental evidence tends to support this in that batteries made pursuant to this invention do not explode under circumstances that would cause prior art batteries to explode.
Test results showing the effect of varying percentages of copper on energy density and internal impedance are provided in Table I. This data is given by way of examples to enable those persons skilled in the art to more clearly understand and practice the invention. They are intended to be illustrative and representative but not limiting to the scope of the invention.
Each of the entries in Table I represents a test cell having a nominal internal volume of 0.035 cu inches constructed in a typical button configuration with single disc shaped current collector, anode and separator. The electrolyte is a 1.5 molar solution of lithium aluminum tetrachloride in thionyl chloride. The anode is a 0.680 inch diameter disc of 0.020 inch thick lithium. The separator is a commercially available ceramic paper. The current collector is acetylene black. Particulate copper is dispersed in the acetylene black which is then compacted into a pellet. The only variable in the cell is the ratio by weight of carbon to copper.
| TABLE I |
| ______________________________________ |
| Ratio % Life Load Internal |
| C:Cu Cu mah voltage Current Impedance |
| ______________________________________ |
| 1:1 50 110 3.29 54.8 5.16 |
| 2:1 33 170 3.30 55.0 5.56 |
| 3:1 25 180 3.29 54.8 5.65 |
| 4:1 20 200 3.28 54.6 5.86 |
| 6:1 14 210 3.28 54.6 5.86 |
| 8:1 11 205 3.24 54.0 6.6 |
| 10:1 9.1 195 3.24 54.0 6.6 |
| 12:1 7.7 195 3.22 53.6 7.0 |
| 16:1 5.9 195 3.22 53.6 7.22 |
| -- 0 190 3.15 52.5 8.57 |
| ______________________________________ |
The foregoing results were taken from samples that were tested shortly after their construction. The trends generally indicated by the data in Table I are accentuated as the batteries are stored at elevated temperatures.
It is understood that the preferred embodiment described above does not limit the scope of the invention. Certainly copper in either a more or less finely divided state would be useful, and other battery geometrics such as spiral wound may also be employed with the present invention.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4262065, | Aug 02 1978 | Altus Corporation | Additive for lithium batteries |
| 4264687, | Sep 24 1979 | DURACELL INC , A CORP OF DEL | Fluid depolarized cell |
| 4272593, | Apr 25 1980 | YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC , A CORP OF DE | Electrochemical cell with improved cathode current collector |
| 4293622, | Dec 17 1979 | BATTERY ENGINEERING, INC , A CORP OF MA | Step cell |
| 4366212, | Feb 09 1981 | DURACELL INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORP OF DE | Non-aqueous cell with fluid cathode depolarizer and corrodible cathode |
| 4367268, | Jul 23 1980 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | High energy electrochemical power cell |
| 4384028, | Aug 06 1981 | ALTUS CORPORATION, 1610 CRANE COURT, SAN JOSE, CA 95112, U S A A CA CORP | Liquid cathode electrochemical cell additives |
| 4495266, | May 07 1982 | YARDNEY TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC , A CORP OF DE | High rate electrochemical cell |
| 4560631, | Dec 19 1983 | Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd. | Organic electrolyte cells |
| 4619874, | May 06 1982 | Medtronic, Inc. | Electrochemical cells with end-of-life indicator |
| 4835074, | Sep 25 1987 | The Electrosynthesis Company, Inc. | Modified carbons and electrochemical cells containing the same |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3578500, | |||
| 3897264, | |||
| 3907593, | |||
| 3918988, | |||
| 3926669, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Aug 02 1978 | Vincent Owen, Catanzarite | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| May 25 1983 | Altus Corporation | CATANZARITE, VINCENT O | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004142 | /0560 | |
| Jul 21 1988 | CATANZARITE, VINCENT, OWEN | Altus Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004923 | /0048 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Sep 11 1982 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 11 1983 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 11 1983 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Sep 11 1985 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Sep 11 1986 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 11 1987 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 11 1987 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Sep 11 1989 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Sep 11 1990 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 11 1991 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 11 1991 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Sep 11 1993 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |