ethanol is produced with a good selectivity and good conversion from methanol, carbon monoxide and hydrogen by conducting reaction in the presence of a cobalt sulfide or a mixture of a cobalt sulfide and at least one of a nitrogen-containing compound and a phosphorus compound.
|
1. A process for producing ethanol from methanol, carbon monoxide and hydrogen, which comprises conducting reaction in the presence of a catalyst consisting essentially of a cobalt sulfide or a mixture of a cobalt sulfide and at least one of a nitrogen-containing compound and a phosphorus compound.
2. A process according to
3. A process according to
5. A process according to
6. A process according to
7. A process according to
8. A process according to
9. A process according to
10. A process according to
11. A process according to
|
The present invention relates to a novel process for producing ethanol from methanol, carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
The so far well known process for producing ethanol from methanol, carbon monoxide and hydrogen uses catalyst systems comprising water-soluble cobalt salts (for example, various organic acid salts) or ruthenium or osmium compounds as main catalyst components and further containing iodine, bromine or their compounds, or further phosphorus compounds (Japanese Laid-open Patent Application No. 73804/77; German Laid-open Patent Applications (DOS) Nos. 2,625,627 and 2,823,309; European Laid-open Patent Application No. 1937). However, in the reaction using these well known catalyst systems, many by-products such as acetaldehyde, dimethoxyethane, diethoxyethane, acetic acid, propionic acid, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, and alcohols having 3 or more carbon atoms are produced in addition to the desired ethanol, and thus ethanol is produced only in an unsatisfactory yield.
In single use of the well known cobalt compound, ruthenium compound or osmium compound as the catalyst, the catalyst activity is very low, and also the selectivity to ethanol is so low that simultaneous use of iodine or bromine is essential for functioning it as the catalyst. However, the use of iodine and bromine not only requires expensive anticorrosive materials of construction for the apparatus, but also tends to promote formation of the by-products in the reaction. Thus, the so far proposed process is not satisfactory from the viewpoint of commercial production.
As a result of extensive studies to overcome the above-mentioned various disadvantages, the present inventors have found that ethanol can be synthesized with a high selectivity by using a cobalt sulfide as a catalyst without any simultaneous use of iodine and bromine. The present invention is based on this finding. The present invention provides a process for producing ethanol from methanol, carbon monoxide and hydrogen, which comprises conducting reaction in the presence of a cobalt sulfide or a mixture of a cobalt sulfide and at least one of a nitrogen-containing compound and a phosphorus compound.
As the cobalt sulfide at least one of enneacobalt octasulfide (Co9 S8), cobalt mono-sulfide (CoS), dicobalt trisulfide (Co2 S3), cobalt disulfide (CoS2), dicobalt heptasulfide (Co2 S7), tricobalt tetrasulfide (Co3 S4), etc., can be used. Cobalt sulfide is insoluble in water, as distinguished from the water-soluble compounds so far used, and thus it is used as powder by dispersion in a reaction system. It can be used as being supported, for example, on a carrier such as activated carbon, silica, alumina, diatomaceous earth, zeolite, etc.
In the present invention, the catalytic effect can be further enhanced by simultaneous use of at least one of the following nitrogen-containing compounds: amides such as formamide, N-methyl formamide, N,N-dimethyl formamide, acetamide, N-methyl acetamide, N,N-dimethyl acetamide, N,N-dimethyl propioamide, α-pyrrolidone, N-methylpyrrolidone, α-piperidone, N-methylpiperidone, etc.; nitriles such as acetonitrile, propionitrile, etc,; trialkylamines such as benzyl dimethylamine, N-methylpyrrolidine, triethanolamine, etc.; heterocyclic compounds such as pyridine, lutidine, picoline, morpholine, etc.
In the present invention, simultaneous use of a phosphorus compound can also enhance the effect of the invention. Particularly, addition of at least one of alkylphospine such as tributylphospine, triphenylphosphine, diphenylphosphine, phenylphosphine, etc., alkylphosphine oxide such as tributylphosphine oxide, diamylphosphine oxide, triethylphosphine oxide, trimethylphosphine oxide, triphenylphosphine oxide, etc., alkylphosphonium salt such as tetraphenylphosphonium bromide, tetraphenylphosphonium iodide, etc. and alkylphosphine sulfide such as trimethylphosphine sulfide, triphenylphosphine sulfide, etc. is effective.
In the present invention, 0.1 to 200 milligram-atoms, preferably 1 to 100 milligram-atoms of the cobalt sulfide in terms of metallic cobalt is used per mole of methanol. Below 0.1 milligram-atom of the cobalt sulfide, reaction can proceed but the reaction rate is lowered. Above 200 milligram-atoms of the cobalt sulfide, the reaction is not adversely influenced, but the above-mentioned range is satisfactory for the practical purpose.
In the present invention, 0.01 to 5 moles, preferably 0.1 to 1 mole, of the nitrogen-containing compound is used per mole of methanol. The amount above 5 moles or below 0.01 mole of the nitrogen-containing compound is effective for the reaction, but the above-mentioned range is satisfactory for practical purpose.
In the present invention, 0.1 to 200 millimoles, preferably 2 to 50 millimoles, of the phosphorus compound is used per mole of methanol. The amount outside the above-mentioned range is effective for the reaction, but the above-mentioned range is satisfactory for the practical purpose.
Carbon monoxide and hydrogen are used at a molar ratio of carbon monoxide to hydrogen of 4:1 to 1:4, preferably 1:2 to 2:1 in the present invention.
Reaction pressure is preferably 50 kg/cm2 gage or higher, and practically not higher than 600 kg/cm2 gage. Particularly preferably range is 100 to 450 kg/cm2 gage.
An inert gas such as argon, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, methane, ethane, etc, can be present in the carbon monoxide and hydrogen to be used in the reaction, but in that case the sum total of partial pressures of carbon monoxide and hydrogen must be within the above-mentioned pressure range.
The reaction temperature depends upon the catalyst system used and other reaction conditions, but is in a range of 150° to 350°C, preferably 180° to 280°C Below 150°C, the reaction can proceed, but the reaction rate is lowered. Above 350° C., side reactions are liable to take place.
According to the present invention, ethanol can be produced with a high selectivity and with less by-products.
The present invention can be carried out batchwise or continuously.
The present invention will be described in detail below, referring to Examples and Comparative Examples.
10 g of methanol, and 1 g of cobalt monosulfide (CoS) powder, 2 g of tributylphosphine, and 5 g of N-methylpyrrolidone as catalysts were placed in a stainless steel shaking type autoclave having a net capacity of 100 ml, and then a gas mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide at a molar ratio of H2 /CO=1 was charged therein under the pressure of 200 kg/cm2 gage, and subjected to reaction at 250°C for 3 hours.
Methanol conversion was 32.5% by mole, and selectivity to ethanol was 90.1%, that to acetaldehyde 2.4%, that to methyl acetate 2.0%, and that to methyl formate 1.1%.
10 g of methanol, and 2 g of cobalt monosulfide (CoS), 2 g of triphenylphosphine and 5 g of acetonitrile as catalysts were placed in the same autoclave as used in Example 1, and the same gas mixture as used in Example 1 was charged therein under the pressure of 200 kg/cm2 gage, and subjected to reaction at 250°C for 4 hours.
Methanol conversion was 36.4% by mole, and selectivity to ethanol was 86.3%, that to acetaldehyde 2.1%, that to methyl acetate 3.2%, and that to ethyl acetate 1.0%.
10 g of methanol, 1 g of dicobalt trisulfide (Co2 S3), 2 g of tributylphosphine oxide, and 5 g of lutidine as catalysts were placed in the same autoclave as used in Example 1, and the same gas mixture as used in Example 1 was charged therein under the pressure of 200 kg/cm2 gage, and subjected to reaction at 250°C for 3 hours.
Methanol conversion was 32% mole, and selectivity to ethanol was 85.4%, that to acetaldehyde 3.0%, that to methyl acetate 2.6%, that to ethyl acetate 1.2%, and that to methyl formate 1%. Examples 4-8 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2
Reaction was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1, changing amount of methanol, mole ratio of carbon monoxide to hydrogen, kind and amount of the catalysts, temperature, pressure and reaction time. The results are shown in the following table.
TABLE |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Example No. 4 5 6 7 8 Comp. Ex. 1 |
Comp. Ex. |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
2 |
Amount of methanol (g) |
15 10 10 10 10 10 10 |
Cobalt sulfide |
Kind CoS CoS CoS CoS CoS CoI2 |
Co2 (CO)8 |
Amount (g) 2 1 1 1 1 1.3 2 |
Nitrogen-containing |
compound |
Kind N-methyl- |
N-methyl |
N-methyl |
n-octane |
N-methyl |
pyrroli- |
pyrroli- |
pyrroli- pyrroli- |
done done done done |
Amount (g) none |
none 5 5 5 10 5 |
Phosphorus compound |
Kind tributyl- triphenyl- |
tributyl- |
tributyl- |
tributyl- |
phosphine phosphine |
phosphine |
phosphine |
phosphine |
sulfide |
Amount (g) none |
2 none 2 2 3 2 |
CO:H2 mole ratio |
1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1.5 1.5:1 1:1 1:1 |
Pressure (initial |
250 200 250 200 220 200 220 |
charge) (kg/cm2 gage) |
Temperature (°C.) |
230 250 230 200 230 230 250 |
Reaction time (hr) |
2 2.5 2 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 |
Methanol conversion |
11.3 |
21.0 18.0 30.7 29.0 45.0 21.0 |
(% by mole) |
Selectivity to |
90.2 |
85.0 82.0 83.3 92.5 63.0 18.8 |
ethanol (%) |
Selectivity to |
0.6 1.4 0.7 1.8 1.9 3.1 9.5 |
acetoaldehyde (%) |
Selectivity to |
6.5 2.0 7.2 4.1 3.8 3.0 9.1 |
methyl acetate (%) |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Okawa, Takashi, Isogai, Nobuo, Wakui, Natuko
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10941357, | Apr 16 2018 | Swift Fuels, LLC | Process for converting C2—C5 hydrocarbons to gasoline and diesel fuel blendstocks |
4423257, | Sep 07 1981 | Seiichi Ishizaka, President of Agency of Industrial Science and | Process for producing ethanol |
4424384, | May 17 1982 | Texaco Inc. | Process for homologation of methanol to ethanol |
4451678, | Apr 16 1982 | Agency of Industrial Science and Technology | Process for producing ethanol |
4552986, | Sep 05 1980 | Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | Process for preparation of ethanol |
4556744, | Oct 08 1983 | The British Petroleum Company P.L.C. | Process for the production of ethanol and/or acetaldehyde by the metal catalysed liquid phase reaction of methanol, carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a solvent |
4605796, | Dec 26 1983 | Agency of Industrial Science and Technology | Process for producing ethanol |
4625049, | Jun 30 1982 | Chevron Research Company | Alcohol carbonylation process using a bimetallic nickel catalyst |
4625050, | Jun 23 1983 | Chevron Research Company | Ether homologation to esters and alcohols using a heterogeneous sulfided catalyst |
4625051, | Jun 23 1983 | Chevron Research Company | Carboxylic acid ester homologation using a sulfided cobalt catalyst |
4628113, | Jun 30 1982 | Chevron Research Company | Alcohol carbonylation process using a bimetallic cobalt catalyst |
4628114, | Jun 23 1983 | Chevron Research Company | Carboxylic acid ester homologation using a sulfided nickel catalyst |
4825013, | Nov 05 1984 | The Dow Chemical Company | Preparation of ethanol and higher alcohols from lower carbon number alcohols |
4954665, | Sep 21 1984 | Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. | Methanol homologation |
7196239, | Nov 19 2003 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Methanol and ethanol production for an oxygenate to olefin reaction system |
7199276, | Nov 19 2003 | EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS, INC | Controlling the ratio of ethylene to propylene produced in an oxygenate to olefin conversion process |
7288689, | Nov 19 2003 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.; ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | Methanol and fuel alcohol production for an oxygenate to olefin reaction system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3387043, | |||
4205190, | Feb 17 1978 | The British Petroleum Company Limited | Process for the hydrocarbonylation of methanol to ethanol in the presence of added oxygen-containing organic compounds |
DE2625627, | |||
DE2823309, | |||
EP1937, | |||
JP5273804, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 30 1980 | Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 08 1984 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 08 1985 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 08 1985 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 08 1987 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 08 1988 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 08 1989 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 08 1989 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 08 1991 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 08 1992 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 08 1993 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 08 1993 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 08 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |