Low-energy fuse in the form of a plastic tube the inner surface of which is coated with explosive. In order to prevent the explosive from being dislodged, the plastic tube is of sandwich-type, the outer part of which will withstand mechanical stress and the inner part of which has such adhesion to the explosive agent that this is only dislodged by a shock wave.
|
1. A low-energy fuse comprising a plastic tube having an inner surface and a coating of explosive in powder form on said inner surface, said plastic tube being of sandwich-type and comprising an outer part having relatively high resistance to external damage and an inner part having an inner adhesive surface on which said explosive is adherently applied, said inner surface having relatively high adhesion so that said explosive applied thereto is dislodged substantially only by a shock wave, said inner part having an outer surface and said outer part having an inner surface directly engaged with said outer surface of said inner part.
2. A low-energy fuse according to
3. A low-energy fuse according to
4. A low energy fuse as claimed in
|
The present invention relates to a low-energy fuse. A known type of such a fuse consists of a plastic pipe or tube normally having an outer diameter of about 3 mm and an inner diameter of about 1.3 mm. A suitable material for the plastic tube may be Surlyn 1554 marketed by DuPont. Such a plastic tube or pipe is coated on the inside with an explosive agent. This may consist of a mixture of cyclotetramethylene tetranitramine and aluminium powder. The ratio of the mixture may be about 91% of the first substance and about 9% of the second substance. If such a fuse is ignited at one end, a shock wave or detonation is obtained due to the coating of explosive, this wave travelling from the starting end to the other end of the fuse. A detonator is generally arranged at the other end of the fuse.
It has been found that explosive in powder form which is applied to the inner surface of the plastic tube does not adhere sufficiently firmly to this surface, the explosive powder often becoming dislodged from the inner surface during transport or storage. During handling, the powder may form blockages in the tube or fall down into said detonator. If a shock wave encounters such a blockage it will terminate at this point. If the explosive powder falls down into the detonate, this may be destroyed without effecting the desired ignition of the explosive substance it is intended to cause to explode.
An object of the present invention is to prevent there being a sufficient quantity of loose explosive powder inside the plastic tube to enable plugs of explosive agent to be formed. According to the invention this object can be achieved by using a plastic tube of sandwich-type i.e. a composite consisting of two parts, an outer part and an inner part. The outer part endows the plastic tube with resistance to external damage and the inner part is provided with an inner surface with such adhesion that explosive agent applied thereon is dislodged substantially only by a shock wave.
The material in the outer part of the plastic tube is selected from polyamide, polypropene, polybutene and similar polymer having satisfactory mechanical properties. Due to the outer part the plastic tube acquires a tensile strength of not less than 35 MPa.
The material in the inner part of the plastic tube is selected from plastic materials suitable for adhesive film, this material giving the inner surface of the inner part such adhesive ability with respect to the explosive that this will only be dislodged from the surface by a shock wave. The plastic selected should preferably have an attractive force of about 5.5 g/m2.
The plastic tube in accordance with the present invention can be manufactured by first extruding the inner part and then passing said inner part through a coating extruder where the outer part is sprayed on. A coating bath or painting on by brush is also feasible. Of course, both the outer part and the inner part can be produced simultaneously by means of extrusion through a specially designed nozzle.
With a plastic tube having an outer diameter of ca. 3 mm and an inner diameter of ca. 1.3 mm there should be at least 2.7 g explosive per m2 on the inner surface of the tube. Such a quantity of explosive will ensure that the shock wave is transmitted in the desired manner. Said quantity of explosive can easily be retained on the inner surface of a plastic tube in accordance with the present invention.
The sole FIGURE of the drawing is a transverse cross-section through a low energy fuse according to the invention.
A plastic tube 1 is extruded in which the plastic material constitutes Surlyn 1855 of such a type that the plastic tube produced has an adhesive outer sheath surface 1a and an adhesive inner sheath surface 1b. The adhesive surface 1b provides excellent adhesion for an explosive agent 2 consisting of a powder mixture of cyclotetramethylene tetranitramine and aluminium powder.
The essential feature of the tube obtained is that its inner sheath surface retains the explosive powder so that it does not become dislodged and form plugs or remains as loose powder inside the tube during transport or storage. After production, the tube 1 is coated internally with the desired quantity of explosive powder 2. According to the above, the quantity shall be such that there is at least 2.7 g of powder per m2 of the inner surface. The tube produced has an inner diameter of 1.3 mm and an outer diameter of 3 mm. The tube with adhesive sheath surfaces is passed through a coating extruder to form an outer layer 3. The coating is given a thickness of about 0.3 mm and the material of the coating is such that the finished tube 4 has a tensile strength of not less than 35 MPa. A suitable material for the outer layer 3 is polyamide, but other materials such as polypropene or polybutene may also be used.
Thanks to the outer layer 3, the formed tube 4 can withstand mechanical stress to a considerable extent, and the mechanical stresses can be quite considerable on a working site. Thanks to the adhesive inner surface 16 of the tube 1, it is guaranteed that the explosive powder applied will remain on the inner surface of the tube 1.
Experiments have been performed with tubes on which 7 g of explosive powder has been applied per m2 of the inner surface in order to determine the adhesive ability. Internally coated tubes were used for these experiments, which were clamped at two points 1/3 m apart. The clamped tubes were then subjected to the action of a clapper hammering on the clamped tube with a frequency of 40 Hz and an amplitude of 2.5 mm for 60 seconds.
The following indicates how much of the powder which was applied became dislodged with various tube materials. The quantity is stated as a percentage.
______________________________________ |
Tube material % dislodged powder |
______________________________________ |
Surlyn 1554 47% |
Surlyn 1706 61% |
Surlyn 1707 57% |
Surlyn 1855 3% |
______________________________________ |
The use of an inner tube 1 with an adhesive sheath surface enables the inner surface to be coated with explosive powder in a quantity of up to about 7 g/m2. Tubes used previously have enabled a coating of up to about 4 g/m2. The good adhesive ability of plastic tube in accordance with the present invention enables it to be stored over a long period and to be subjected to rough treatment while the plastic tube is being fitted, without the explosive powder being dislodged from the sheath surface.
Lundborg, Hans, Kristensen, Leif, Nyqvist, Stig
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10996038, | Apr 05 2019 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Coreless-coil shock tube package system |
11192832, | Oct 01 2019 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Coreless-coil shock tube system with reduced noise |
11554998, | Oct 01 2019 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Coreless-coil shock tube system with reduced noise |
11845703, | Oct 01 2019 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Coreless-coil shock tube system with reduced noise |
4402270, | Nov 14 1980 | CXA Ltd/CXA LTEE | High speed detonating cord with modified velocity of detonation |
4488486, | Dec 16 1982 | United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Low brisance detonating cord |
4493261, | Nov 02 1983 | Orica Explosives Technology Pty Ltd | Reinforced explosive shock tube |
4607573, | Apr 03 1984 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Laminated fuse and manufacturing process therefor |
4615272, | Sep 12 1984 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Bomb and bomb liner |
4660474, | Jan 13 1984 | Britanite Industrias Quimicas Ltda. | Percussion or impact wave conductor unit |
4671178, | Jul 10 1984 | AECI Limited | Low energy fuses |
4699059, | Dec 16 1985 | CXA Ltd. | Explosive shock tube having lateral initiation properties |
4757764, | Dec 20 1985 | DYNO NOBEL INC ; DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS | Nonelectric blasting initiation signal control system, method and transmission device therefor |
4817673, | May 08 1986 | Orica Explosives Technology Pty Ltd | Fuse tube with reinforcing element |
4838165, | Apr 30 1987 | DYNO NOBEL INC ; DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS | Impeded velocity signal transmission line |
4991511, | Oct 25 1989 | Haley & Weller Limited | Non-disruptive detonating cord |
5010821, | Dec 22 1986 | Lockheed Corporation; Lockheed Martin Corporation | Dual purpose energy transfer cord |
5166470, | Aug 13 1990 | Imperial Chemical Industries PLC | Low energy fuse |
5212341, | Aug 15 1991 | DYNO NOBEL INC | Co-extruded shock tube |
5243913, | Sep 09 1991 | ORICA TRADING PTY LIMITED | Shock tube initiator |
5317974, | Feb 03 1988 | ORICA TRADING PTY LIMITED | Low energy fuse and method and manufacture |
5327835, | Jul 01 1993 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Detonation device including coupling means |
5357234, | Apr 23 1993 | GA-TEK INC DBA GOULD ELECTRONICS INC | Current limiting fuse |
5413046, | Mar 11 1994 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Shock tube assembly |
5417162, | Jul 01 1993 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Detonation coupling device |
5426411, | Apr 23 1993 | FERRAZ S A | Current limiting fuse |
5509355, | Feb 03 1988 | ORICA TRADING PTY LIMITED | Low energy fuse and method of manufacture |
5515784, | Aug 09 1994 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Signal transmission devices and detonation systems using the same |
5597973, | Jan 30 1995 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Signal transmission fuse |
5629493, | Nov 17 1992 | DYNO NOBEL INC | Low energy fuse having improved properties in both axial and radial directions |
5689083, | May 09 1996 | The Ensign-Bickford Company; ENSIGN-BICKFORD COMPANY, THE, A CORP OF CT | Obturating initiation fitting |
5747722, | Jan 11 1996 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Detonators having multiple-line input leads |
5827994, | Jul 11 1996 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Fissile shock tube and method of making the same |
5837924, | Nov 21 1995 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Signal transmission tube using reclaim material and method of manufacture |
5844322, | Nov 17 1992 | DYNO NOBEL INC | Low energy fuse and method for its manufacture |
6006671, | Feb 24 1995 | Hybrid shock tube/LEDC system for initiating explosives | |
6170398, | Aug 29 1997 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Signal transmission fuse |
6272996, | Oct 07 1998 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | In-line initiator and firing device assembly |
6347566, | Aug 29 1997 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Method of making a signal transmission fuse |
6601516, | Mar 30 2001 | UNIVERSAL PROPULSION COMPANY, INC | Low energy fuse |
6694886, | Aug 31 1999 | DYNO NOBEL HOLDING AS; DYNO NOBEL INC | Rigid reactive cord and methods of use and manufacture |
7086335, | Mar 07 2003 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Redundant signal transmission system and deployment means |
7162957, | Mar 07 2003 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Redundant signal transmission system and development method |
7434515, | Jun 14 2006 | DETOTEC NORTH AMERICA | Signal transmission fuse |
7650993, | Aug 13 2004 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | Coreless-coil shock tube package system |
8061273, | Apr 30 2004 | DYNO NOBEL INC | Tubular signal transmission device and method of manufacture |
8327766, | Apr 30 2004 | DYNO NOBEL INC | Energetic linear timing element |
9945488, | Nov 10 2015 | GOODRICH CORPORATION | Mechanically-activated inflation valve actuation apparatus |
RE37689, | Feb 03 1988 | ORICA TRADING PTY LIMITED | Low energy fuse and method of manufacture |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3027839, | |||
3428502, | |||
3431849, | |||
3590739, | |||
3968724, | Oct 03 1974 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Method for accurately varying the density of a powder or powder charge, and shrink tubes for use therewith |
4060033, | Mar 09 1976 | Atlas Powder Company | Delay booster assembly |
GB1328387, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 21 1979 | Nitro Nobel AB | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 11 1985 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 11 1985 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 11 1986 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 11 1988 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 11 1989 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 11 1989 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 11 1990 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 11 1992 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 11 1993 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 11 1993 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 11 1994 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 11 1996 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |