Preparation of 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine in high yields and purity by chlorinating 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine at 70° to 250°C with chlorine in the presence of a catalyst containing one or more molybdenum, tungsten or ruthenium compounds.

Patent
   4331811
Priority
Mar 12 1981
Filed
Mar 12 1981
Issued
May 25 1982
Expiry
Mar 12 2001
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
9
7
EXPIRED
1. In a process for making 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine by contacting 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine with chlorine in the presence of a catalyst at a temperature of 70° to 250°C, the improvement comprising employing a catalyst selected from the group consisting of tungsten hexacarbonyl or molybdenum hexacarbonyl.
2. process of claim 1 wherein the temperature is from 150° to 200°C
3. process of claim 1 wherein the reaction is carried out under ambient pressure conditions.
4. process of claim 1 wherein the reaction is carried out under elevated pressure conditions.

Chlorinated pyridine derivatives are known compounds and have been prepared by a number of processes. Such processes include, for example, those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,420,833; 3,244,722; 3,732,230; 3,186,994; 3,538,100; British Pat. No. 957,276 and copending application 16,646 filed Mar. 1, 1979. The products of these processes have been used as herbicides and pesticides and as chemical intermediates in the preparation of other highly desired herbicide or pesticide products. Of the many chlorinated pyridine derivatives, 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine is a particularly desirable intermediate for the preparation of selective herbicides having wide utility in the presence of valuable crops.

In accordance with this invention, 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine is prepared in high yields and high purity by a process which comprises contacting 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine with chlorine in the presence of a catalyst at a temperature of 70° to 250°C, wherein the catalyst comprises one or more molybdenum, tungsten or ruthenium compound.

The catalysts include, for example, molybdenum, tungsten or ruthenium chlorides, bromides, oxychlorides, oxybromides, phosphines and acetates. Particularly advantageous catalysts are tungsten hexachloride, molybdenum pentachloride, tungsten hexacarbonyl, molybdenum hexacarbonyl, tungsten and molybdenum oxytetrachloride, and ruthenium chloride. The preferred catalysts are those containing tungsten or molybdenum.

The starting 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine is contacted in the liquid state with chlorine at temperatures of 70° to 250°C, preferably 150° to 200°C, and at atmospheric or superatmospheric pressures of up to about 200 psig or more, in the presence of an effective amount, advantageously about 0.01 to about 10 weight percent, preferably about 2 to about 5 weight percent, of the catalyst.

The process of the present invention is preferably conducted under essentially anhydrous conditions, and is preferably carried out in a continuous, cyclical operation, although batch operations may be employed, if desired.

In carrying out the process of the present invention, gaseous chlorine is passed into the liquid 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine starting material at a temperature of at least 70°C, in the presence of the desired catalyst. At least an equimolar amount of the chlorine gas reactant is employed with from 0.3 to about 10 excess molar proportions of chlorine per mole of starting material desirably being employed. The continuous passage of excess chlorine gas through the reaction mixture serves not only to supply a large amount of reactant but to sweep out any carbon tetrachloride or hydrogen chloride by-products. The most suitable rate at which the chlorine gas is fed will vary with the reaction temperature, pressure, reaction mixture volume, etc. An excess amount of from about 0.3 to about 5.0 moles of chlorine per hour is usually employed per mole of 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine.

The degree of catalytic activity may vary depending on the reaction conditions. However, those skilled in the art can, by routine experimentation, readily determine the optimum catalyst and amount thereof required for any particular set of pressure, temperature or time conditions desired. Catalysts bonded to an inert support such as, for example, alumina, silica, silica alumina, various clays and molecular sieves are also contemplated for use in the present invention.

Generally, an increase of 10° to 15°C in the temperature range has the effect of approximately doubling the reaction rate, while the approximate doubling in the pressure from 100 to 200 psig provides a similar response. Up to certain levels, an approximate doubling of the catalyst amount also has been found to approximately double the reaction rate.

The only constraint placed upon the superatmospheric pressures employed is one of economics, it being recognized that the cost factor for pressure equipment to allow operation above, for example, 200 psig is greatly increased and the cost may exceed any benefits obtained.

The 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine is known and can be prepared according to the methods described in the known art.

The following examples further illustrate the present invention but are not to be construed as limiting. Unless otherwise indicated, all parts are by weight.

A mixture of 23.1 g (0.1 mole) of 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine and 2.0 g (0.005 mole) of tungsten hexachloride was heated at 120°C while sparging in chlorine for 42.5 hours. Vapor phase chromatography (VPC) indicated 18 percent 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine. The reaction mixture was then heated to 170° to 175°C for an additional 7 hours with the addition of chlorine and was then found (VPC) to contain about 95 percent 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine.

The reaction mixture was diluted with hexane and washed with water. The organic layer was separated, dried with MgSO4 and the solvent removed by evaporation to give 26.7 g of yellow liquid. Distillation gave 24.9 g of 95.6 percent 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (89.7 percent yield). The impurities were analyzed and found to be:

2,3,5,6-tetrachloropyridine (1.6%)

2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (1.6%)

2,3,6-trichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (1.2%)

Chlorine was slowly sparged into a mixture of 5773 g (25 moles) of 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine and 496 g (1.25 moles, 5 mol %) of tungsten hexachloride which was heated to 175° to 185°C After 27.5 hours, the reaction mixture was cooled and dissolved in carbon tetrachloride. The organics were washed with a sodium carbonate solution and dried over anhydrous sodium carbonate. Evaporation of the solvent gave 6793 g of a yellow orange liquid. Analysis of the product by gas chromatography indicated 94.2 percent 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine.

Example 1 was repeated using 25 g (0.11 mole) of 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine and 1.25 g (5 wt. %) of tungsten hexacarbonyl as the catalyst. After 16 hours of reaction, the product was worked up as in Example 2. There was obtained 18.0 g of orange yellow liquid having the following composition (internal standard gas chromatography):

2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (86.06%)

2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (2.32%)

2,3,6-trichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (5.12%)

The experiment of Example 1 was repeated using 1.37 g (0.005 mole) of molybdenum pentachloride as catalyst and a temperature of 170° to 175°C After 13.5 hours, the product was worked up and dried as in Example 1. Distillation through a Vigreux column afforded 23.5 g of a colorless liquid which was 94.5 percent 2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine. The impurities were analyzed and found to be:

2,3,5,6-tetrachloropyridine (1.7%)

2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (2.7%)

2,3,6-trichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (1.1%)

Example 3 was repeated using molybdenum pentachloride as the catalyst. After 8.5 hours of reaction the product was worked up as in Example 2. Obtained 20.5 g of yellow liquid having the following composition (gas chromatography):

2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (95.3%)

2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (1.9%)

2,3,6-trichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (2.0%)

Example 3 was repeated using molybdenum hexacarbonyl as the catalyst. After 24 hours of reaction the product was worked up as in Example 2. There was obtained 18 g of product having the following composition (gas chromatography):

2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (83.3%)

2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (2.5%)

2,3,6-trichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (7.6%)

Chlorine was slowly sparged into a mixture of 23 g (0.1 mole) of 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine and 2.5 g (10 weight percent) of molybdenum oxytetrachloride (MoCl4 O) and heated to 170°C for 12 hours. The mixture of reaction products was found (gas chromatography) to have the following composition:

2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (76.5%)

2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (2.0%)

2,3,6-trichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (1.8%)

2,3,5,6-tetrachloropyridine (11.8%)

pentachloropyridine (3.9%)

2,3,6-trichloropyridine (3.2%)

Chlorine was slowly sparged into a mixture of 2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (23.1 g, 0.1 mole) and ruthenium chloride (1.04 g, 0.005 mole) at 175° to 180°C for 29.5 hours. After the reaction mixture cooled, it was diluted with toluene and the ruthenium salts which precipitated were removed by filtration. The organic layer was washed with a saturated solution of sodium chloride and dried with MgSO4. Removal of the drying agent and solvent afforded a light brown liquid which upon analysis by gas chromatography was found to contain the following:

2,3-dichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (73%)

2-chloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (10%)

2,3,6-trichloro-5-trichloromethylpyridine (14%)

2,6-dichloro-3-trichloromethylpyridine (2%)

Various modifications may be made in this invention without departing from the spirit or scope thereof and it is understood that we limit ourselves only as defined in the appended claims.

Mixan, Craig E., Wilson, Charles A., Werner, John A.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10081582, Oct 22 2014 Eagle US 2 LLC Process for producing chlorinated hydrocarbons in the presence of a polyvalent molybdenum compound
10442765, Jun 14 2013 Cheminova A/S Method for producing 2,3-dichloro-5-(trichloromethyl)pyridine
4420618, Mar 07 1980 Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha Ltd. Process for producing 5-chloro-β-trifluoromethylpyridines
4483993, Apr 08 1983 DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE, A CORP OF DE Production of polychlorinated pyridine mixtures by liquid phase chlorination of beta-picoline or beta-picoline hydrochloride
4490534, Nov 04 1981 Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha Ltd. Process for producing 3-chloro-5-trifluoromethylpyridines
4701532, Mar 25 1983 The Dow Chemical Company Method of selectively chlorinating 2-chloro-5-(trichloromethyl) pyridine in the 3-position
4804763, Aug 20 1984 SILVER POINT FINANCE, LLC Method for preparing chlorine-containing derivatives of pyridine compounds
5182246, Dec 26 1989 Sagami Chemical Research Center Catalyst for hydrogenation, dehydrosilylation or hydrosilylation and use thereof
9809543, Jun 14 2013 CHEMINOVA A S Method for producing 2,3-dichloro-5-(trichloromethyl)pyridine
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3186994,
3244722,
3420833,
3538100,
3732230,
4256894, Apr 24 1978 The Dow Chemical Company Preparation of chlorinated pyridines
GB957276,
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Mar 03 1981WERNER, JOHN A DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY THEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0039490001 pdf
Mar 03 1981MIXAN, CRAIG E DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY THEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0039490001 pdf
Mar 10 1981WILSON, CHARLES A DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY THEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0039490001 pdf
Mar 12 1981The Dow Chemical Company(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jul 01 1985M170: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 96-517.
Jul 31 1989M171: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, PL 96-517.
Aug 03 1989ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Dec 28 1993REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jan 10 1994REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
May 22 1994EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
May 25 19854 years fee payment window open
Nov 25 19856 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 25 1986patent expiry (for year 4)
May 25 19882 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
May 25 19898 years fee payment window open
Nov 25 19896 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 25 1990patent expiry (for year 8)
May 25 19922 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
May 25 199312 years fee payment window open
Nov 25 19936 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 25 1994patent expiry (for year 12)
May 25 19962 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)