A method of applying an intermediate bond coat on a laser mirror substrate is described comprising surface polishing the mirror substrate followed by depositing a layer of amorphous silicon, amorphous germanium, or mixtures thereof on the mirror surface, and polishing the thus coated mirror surface to a substantially void-free surface finish. laser mirror substrates such as graphite fiber reinforced glass, molybdenum and silicon carbide coated by such process are also described.

Patent
   4444467
Priority
Aug 10 1981
Filed
Aug 10 1981
Issued
Apr 24 1984
Expiry
Aug 10 2001

TERM.DISCL.
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
23
10
EXPIRED
1. A laser mirror substrate suitable for subsequent deposition of a laser radiation reflecting outer layer comprising a laser mirror substrate coated with an intermediate bonding layer of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited amorphous silicon, amorphous germanium, or mixtures thereof.
6. A method of coating a laser mirror substrate with an intermediate bonding layer comprising surface polishing the mirror surface, baking the polished mirror surface to remove impurities, depositing a layer of amorphous silicon, amorphous germanium, or mixtures thereof on the mirror surface by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, and polishing the coated mirror to a substantially void-free, highly polished surface finish.
2. The article of claim 1 wherein the mirror substrate comprises graphite fiber reinforced glass, silicon carbide or molybdenum.
3. The article of claim 1 wherein the intermediate coating is amorphous silicon.
4. The article of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the intermediate coating is overcoated with a laser radiation reflecting outer layer.
5. The mirror of claim 3 wherein the coating is at least 15 microns thick.
7. The mirror of claim 6 wherein after polishing, the surface has a surface finish of about 10 to about 15 Å rms.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the coating is at least 15 microns thick.
9. The method of claim 6 wherein after polishing, a laser radiation reflecting outer layer is deposited on the substantially void-free surface finish.
10. The method of claim 6 wherein the mirror substrate comprises graphite fiber reinforced glass, silicon carbide or molybdenum.
11. The method of claim 6 wherein the intermediate coating is amorphous silicon.

1. Technical Field

The field of art to which this invention pertains is composite optical elements of the reflecting type, and particularly coating methods for such optical elements.

2. Background Art

A recent discovery has advanced the state of the laser mirror art significantly. Laser mirrors comprising graphite fibers in a glass matrix have been found to provide a laser mirror of low density, high elastic stiffness, high strength, high fracture toughness, low thermal expansion, high thermal conductivity and environmental stability. Note commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,256,378, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.

In the process of making such mirrors, great difficulty has been encountered in the application of the reflective coatings to these mirrors. In preparatory surface polishing of the optical surfaces of the graphite fiber reinforced glass matrix composite mirror substrates, surface voids up to 15 microns in depth and width have formed. (Note FIG. 1.) Accordingly, when applying the laser radiation reflective coating to the mirror surface, a coating is required which will not only fill these voids, but can be polished back to a specular finish of radiant energy reflecting quality.

Other desirable attributes of a coating in this environment include good adhesion to the mirror substrate, preferably a low processing temperature, coefficients of thermal expansion matched as closely as possible to the mirror substrate, and a coating which is polishable to an optical finish, preferably utilizing conventional techniques.

Surprisingly, the very qualities which make the improved laser mirror substrates described above superior in this area contribute to the difficulties in applying the optically reflective coating. For example, conventional chemical vapor deposition which is generally used in this art, requires relatively high substrate temperatures for deposition. But since the fiber reinforced glass mirror substrates are so dimensionally stable over a wide range of temperatures, upon cooling the thus deposited films shrink, crack and spall from the mirror substrate surface. Accordingly, until now vacuum deposition techniques have been used at low temperatures, but these deposition rates are so slow as to be impractical for building films up to the several mil thickness required to fill the substrate voids which occur upon polishing. Furthermore, additional build-up in coating thickness is desirable so as to be tolerant to the subsequent removal of the coating material which takes place when the mirrors are polished.

In addition to the recent graphite-glass mirror substrates, improved coating methods would also be advantageous for such conventional mirror substrates as molybdenum and silicon carbide. To obtain a smooth finish on silicon carbide, being a very hard substance, is both very expensive and highly labor intensive. And molybdenum is only polishable up to about a 50 Å rms surface finish.

Accordingly, what is needed in this art is a relatively inexpensive coating process for mirror substrates which can also provide a highly polished surface.

The present invention is directed to a laser mirror substrate coated with an adherent, void filling, highly polishable intermediate layer, upon which the ultimate laser radiation reflecting outer layer can be applied. The intermediate layer comprises an amorphous silicon and/or an amorphous germanium coating applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition.

Another aspect of the invention comprises a method of coating a laser mirror substrate by surface polishing the mirror substrate, applying an intermediate bond coating of amorphous silicon and/or amorphous germanium by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition to the laser mirror substrate, polishing the thus deposited coating, and applying a laser radiation reflecting outer layer to the intermediate coating.

The foregoing, and other features and advantages of the present invention, will become more apparent from the following description and accompanying drawing.

FIG. 1 shows a laser mirror according to the present invention after surface polishing and before coating.

FIGS. 2 and 3 show schematically apparatus useful for coating mirrors according to the present invention.

FIG. 4 shows the mirror surface after coating.

FIG. 5 shows the coated mirror before and after polishing.

Although the process according to the present invention can be used on any surface where a highly polishable coating is desired, the process has particular applicability in the laser mirror field and those fields where high reflectivity is important. And while distinct advantages are imparted to conventional mirror substrates such as molybdenum and silicon carbide, the process has particular applicability to graphite fiber reinforced glass mirror substrates.

As described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,256,378, any graphite fiber with the requisite high strength and good modulus of elasticity can be used in these laser mirrors coated according to the present invention. Hercules HMS graphite fiber and Celanese GY70 graphite fibers are particularly suitable. The fibers are used in the glass matrix at about 40% to 70% by volume based on the graphite glass composite and preferably at about 60% by volume.

The glass matrix used is particularly selected to have a very low coefficient of thermal expansion, preferably matched closely but not equal to that of the graphite fibers used since the graphite has a highly negative axial coefficient of thermal expansion, and the glass has a positive but small coefficient of thermal expansion. Particularly suitable for the purpose of the present invention is a borosilicate glass such as Corning Glass Works CGW 7740.

And while a variety of methods may be used to produce these laser mirror substrates, to be coated according to the present invention, the preferred method is that described in the above cited patent and comprises passing the graphite fibers through a slip of the powdered glass and solvent to impregnate the fibers. The fibers are then wound on a drum and dried, removed from the drum and cut into strips up to the diameter of the mirror to be fabricated. While typical test samples made were about ten centimeters in diameter, mirrors up to twenty centimeters in diameter have also been treated by the processes according to the present invention. However, mirrors of even larger diameters can be made according to the present invention. The fibers are then laid in alternating ply stacks of any orientation desired such as 0° and 45°; 0°, 45° and 90°; 0°, 30° and 90°; 0° and 60°, etc., with 0° and 90° being preferred. The assembled composite is then hot pressed either under vacuum or inert gas such as argon on metal dies coated with colloidal boron nitride or graphite dies sprayed with boron nitride at pressures of 6.9-13.8 MPa (1,000-2,000 psi) at temperatures of 1050°-1450°C

Initial polishing is then done with conventional polishing equipment and grinding apparatus. Generally at this time, under such surface polishing, surface voids in excess of 15 microns in depth and width develop. Note FIG. 1. This is a consequence of the breaking and pulling away of the graphite fibers at the surface during this polishing operation. The intermediate bond coating operation according to the present invention, as discussed above, in addition to having the advantages of good adhesion of coating material to the mirror substrate, relatively low processing temperature, coating coefficients of thermal expansion compatible with the mirror substrate and easy polishability with conventional polishing techniques after application, also has the ability to fill these voids securely. This is done by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition of amorphous silicon, amorphous germanium, or mixtures thereof in any relative proportions desired.

By plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition is meant the plasma excitation of a low pressure chemical vapor deposition system. This provides for effectively high gas temperature which results in the pyrolysis of the reactant gas while still being able to maintain a low substrate temperature for deposition of the coating. Deposition conditions (gas pressure, flow rate and substrate temperature) can be adjusted to provide for the deposition of a stress-free film. This is a key factor contributing to the highly polishable nature and adherence of the intermediate bond layer deposited according to the present invention. In order to accomplish this stress-free coating, a narrow range of deposition conditions should be utilized. For example, utilizing an about 1% to about 5% by volume reactive gas content and a 13.5 Mhz induction coil at power levels of approximately 100 watts for excitation, a pressure of about 1 torr at a temperature of about 200°C and total system flow rate of about 100-200 cc per minute should be used.

An apparatus useful for applying the plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition coatings is shown schematically in FIG. 2. In this Fig., the initially polished mirror substrate 11 is placed on support 10 in quartz reactor 1. The substrate can be rotated during deposition to ensure a uniformly deposited layer. The reactant gas enters the system as indicated by arrow 2. The high frequency coil 3 contained on the metal shield 4 is used for plasma excitation. Pressure guage 5 is used to monitor the reaction conditions. Excess reactants are trapped in cracking furnace 6 and liquid nitrogen trap 7 and molecular sieve 8. A vacuum is maintained by means of vacuum pump 9. In this embodiment, the mirror substrate supported upstream of the gas by a flat quartz holder 10 is placed 3 inches (7.62 cm) from the center of a six-turn rf coil, and held at 200°C by an externally controlled resistance heater during deposition. The 1.0 meter long horizontal quartz reactor tube, having a 42 mm inner diameter, was surrounded with a grounded metal shield to ensure a uniform silane-helium plasma. Pressure conditions of about a 1 to 10 torr may be used, but best results are obtained with a total pressure of about 1 torr for deposition. And while any thickness of coating may be deposited, in general, coating thicknesses of at least 15 microns are deposited, and preferably in the range of 3-5 mils.

This (FIG. 2) represents a conventional plasma enhanced vapor deposition apparatus particularly adapted for the use described herein. However, best results have been obtained with a novel reactor geometry developed specifically for the deposition of amorphous silicon and germanium at rates which are nearly an order of magnitude greater than that which can be obtained with the best commercial systems. Note FIG. 3. For example, with the best commercial systems depositions of 180-200 Å per minute at 200°C have been obtained. However, employing the reactor geometry described herein, a deposition rate of 1700 Å per minute at 200°C has been obtained. Furthermore, an increase in temperature in the reactor results in a corresponding increase in deposition rate. The key to obtaining such rates is the unique manner in which inductive coupling is employed for plasma excitation, whereas typical commercial systems primarily employ capacitive coupling for plasma excitation. The plasma excitation is performed by employing the plasma excitation downstream (31) of the piece to be coated (32). Secondly, inserts (33 and 34) which reduce the cross sectional area of the reactor tube are also used. The inserts are generally identical in shape with an outer diameter substantially the same as the inner diameter of the reaction tube. For example, in the apparatus described above, the inserts had an outer diameter of about 45 mm, doughnut shaped with a rectangular opening in the center with dimensions of 0.5 by 1.5 inches (1.27 by 3.81 cm). Other materials such as quartz or metals stable in this environment may also be used. The insertion of these units results in nearly a four-fold increase in deposition rate. The upstream insert (33) is believed to introduce turbulence to the gas flow and the downstream insert (34) provides not only turbulence, but functions as a barrier for controlling back diffusion of excited species in the deposition area. The remainder of the apparatus as shown in FIG. 3 is indicated by a silane or germane source tank 35 controlled by valve 36, which results in gas flow in the direction shown by arrow 37. The rf generator 38 is a 250 to 400 kilocycle commercial rf induction heating generator which provides the source power for induction heating coil 39. Although an inductive rf coupler is shown as the heat source in this apparatus, other conventional heat sources such as resistance heating and radiant heating can be used.

The temperature ranges used in the process according to the present invention will depend on the heat source used. For resistance heating, temperatures of room temperature to 500°C can be used. For rf coupling (inductive heating), room temperature to the melting temperature of the substrate can be used; and for radiant heating, room temperature to 650°C can be used. A conventional drive motor 40 is used to rotate the substrate 32 which is preferably placed on the base 44 in an inverted position to prevent any extraneous materials from inadvertently dropping onto the substrate during the coating operation. The essential feature of the apparatus according to the present invention is the use of the inductive coil 31 downstream of the gas flow and substrate being coated. An rf generator 42 in conjunction with 31 provides the necessary plasma excitation. A trap 43 is used to collect any extraneous conductive particulate material. The remainder of the system can be as shown by characters 5-9 in FIG. 2.

Generally, the systems are run at reduced pressures of about 1 torr, utilizing gas mixtures of about 1% to about 5% SiH4 or GeH4 in an inert gas such as helium, nitrogen, argon, etc. While silane and germane are the preferred reactant gases, any volatilizable silicon or germanium compound may be employed. The power requirements are matched to the size of the system with smaller volume systems requiring lesser power inputs and larger volume systems having greater power requirements.

By this process, not only does the silicon film deposited adequately fill the mirror voids, but a surface roughness is produced which is no more than approximately 3 microns. At this point, conventional mechanical or chemical polishing techniques can be employed producing a highly specular, void-free surface suitable for mirror fabrication. For example, conventional molybdenum laser mirror substrates generally polish up to a 50 Å rms or greater surface finish. However, with the amorphous silicon and germanium coatings according to the present invention, surface finishes of about 10 to about 15 Å rms can be obtained.

FIG. 3 shows the surface of the mirror after deposition, and FIG. 4 shows, left to right, the mirror before and after the final conventional polishing step. As the outermost reflective coating, any conventional reflective coating, in the infra-red, visible, ultraviolet, laser, etc. range may be deposited once the highly polished intermediate layer is formed. This can include such things as gold; gold, silver or aluminum overcoated with thorium tetrafluoride; gold, silver, or aluminum overcoated with silicon oxide or magnesium fluoride; and multi-layered dielectric coatings such as alternating layers of one quarter optical wavelength thickness of zinc sulfide and thorium tetrafluoride.

Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to detailed embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.

Shuskus, Alexander J., Cowher, Melvyn E.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
4791071, Feb 20 1986 Texas Instruments Incorporated Dual dielectric gate system comprising silicon dioxide and amorphous silicon
4814232, Mar 25 1987 ADAPTIVE OPTICS ASSOCIATES, INC Method for depositing laser mirror coatings
4821282, Dec 27 1985 Honeywell Inc.; Honeywell INC Mirror assembly for lasers
4856887, Apr 01 1987 HE HOLDINGS, INC , A DELAWARE CORP ; Raytheon Company Lightweight silicon carbide mirror
4865436, Mar 25 1986 Honeywell Inc. Low cost ring laser angular rate sensor
4865451, Dec 22 1986 Silicon substrate mirror assembly for lasers
4915494, Jul 06 1988 Harris Corporation Carbon-carbon mirror for space applications
5071596, Oct 23 1989 Rohm and Haas Chemicals LLC Fabrication of lightweight ceramic mirrors by means of a chemical vapor deposition process
5110422, Dec 13 1989 OFFICE NATIONAL D'ETUDES ET DE RECHERCHES AEROSPATIALES Method for producing an adherent metal deposit on carbon, and mirror obtained by this method
5208704, Nov 25 1991 Ultralight mirrors
5505805, Mar 05 1992 ECM INGENIEUR-UNTERNEHMEN FUR ENERGIE-UND UMWELTTECHNIK Method for the production of reflectors
5535056, May 15 1991 Donnelly Corporation Method for making elemental semiconductor mirror for vehicles
5565052, Mar 05 1992 ECM INGENIEUR-UNTERNEHMEN FUR ENERGIE-UND UMWELTTECHNIK Method for the production of a reflector
5741445, Feb 06 1996 Rohm and Haas Chemicals LLC Method of making lightweight closed-back mirror
5751489, May 15 1991 Donnelly Corporation Elemental semiconductor mirror for vehicles
5825565, Mar 05 1992 ECM INGENIEUR-UNTERNEHMEN FUR ENERGIE-UND UMWELTTECHNIK Reflector
6065840, May 15 1991 Donnelly Corporation Elemental semiconductor mirror
6196688, May 15 1991 Donnelly Corporation Elemental semiconductor mirror
6286965, May 15 1991 Donnelly Corporation Elemental semiconductor mirror for vehicles and method for making same
6426968, May 04 1982 United Technologies Corporation Hybrid optical mirror
7188964, Feb 25 2003 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Integrated actuator meniscus mirror
7192145, Feb 25 2003 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Integrated actuator meniscus mirror without reaction mass
7244034, Aug 20 1999 II-VI DELAWARE, INC Low CTE metal-ceramic composite articles, and methods for making same
Patent Priority Assignee Title
1532002,
4140814, Dec 01 1977 Texas Instruments Incorporated Plasma deposition of transparent conductive layers
4214818, Jun 20 1974 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Hot pressed SiC-high power laser mirror
4256378, Jul 02 1979 United Technologies Corporation Graphite-glass composite laser mirror
4289797, Oct 11 1979 AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC , Method of depositing uniform films of Six Ny or Six Oy in a plasma reactor
4357286, Nov 05 1980 United Technologies Corporation Method of making a graphite-glass composite laser mirror
4386825, Jul 02 1979 United Technologies Corporation Cooled, thermally stable composite mirrors
4386986, Apr 06 1981 United Technologies Corporation High power laser mirror repair
4387962, Oct 06 1981 The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Corrosion resistant laser mirror heat exchanger
4388344, Aug 31 1981 United Technolgies Corporation Method of repairing surface defects in coated laser mirrors
///
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 06 1981SHUSKUS, ALEXANDER J UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, HARTFORD, CT A COR OF DEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0039100665 pdf
Aug 07 1981COWHER, MELVYN E UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, HARTFORD, CT A COR OF DEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0039100665 pdf
Aug 10 1981United Technologies Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Sep 16 1987M170: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 96-517.
Sep 17 1991M171: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, PL 96-517.
Oct 07 1991ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Nov 28 1995REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Apr 21 1996EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 24 19874 years fee payment window open
Oct 24 19876 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 24 1988patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 24 19902 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 24 19918 years fee payment window open
Oct 24 19916 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 24 1992patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 24 19942 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 24 199512 years fee payment window open
Oct 24 19956 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 24 1996patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 24 19982 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)