A magnetic recording medium comprising a substrate, a magnetic layer formed on the substrate and comprising a metallic magnetic material as a recording element and a protective layer formed on the magnetic layer and comprising a perfluroalkyl polyether derivative having a phosphate terminal group, which has improved durability and corrosion resistivity.
|
1. A magnetic recording medium comprising a substrate, a magnetic layer formed on the substrate and comprising a metallic magnetic material as a recording element and a protective layer formed on the magnetic layer and comprising a perfluroalkyl polyether derivative having a phosphate terminal group.
2. A magnetic recording medium according to
--[CF(CF3)--CF2 O]--, --(CF2 CF2 O)-- or --(CF2 O)-- B is a group of the formula: --(CF2 COO)-- or --[CF(CF3)--COO]-- X is hydrogen or fluorine, R is hydrogen, fluorine, methyl, trifluoromethyl or chloromethyl, n is an integer of 10 to 50 and m is an integer of 1 to 50. 3. A magnetic recording medium according to
7. A magnetic recording medium according to
8. A magnetic recording medium according to
9. A magnetic recording medium according to
10. A magnetic recording medium according to
11. A magnetic recording material according to
|
The present invention relates to a magnetic recording medium. More particularly, it relates to a magnetic recording medium provided with a protective layer on a magnetic layer to impart good durability and corrosion resistivity to the recording medium.
Generally, a magnetic recording medium is produced by painting a magnetic powder composition comprising magnetic powder and a binding agent on a substrate film surface or by metallizing the surface with a ferromagnetic metal or its alloy and the like to form a magnetic layer. Since the magnetic layer is vigorously slid on a magnetic head during playback, its surface tends to be seriously abrased. Although the magnetic recording medium of the ferromagnetic metallic thin layer type produced by metallizing and the magnetic recording medium having the metallic magnetic powder are excellent in high density recording property, their surfaces have large friction coefficient against the magnetic head so that they tend to be easily abrased or damaged in use and further gradually oxidized in the air resulting in deterioration of their magnetic characteristics such as maximum magnetic flux density.
In order to improve durability and corrosion resistivity of these magnetic recording media, it is proposed to form on the magnetic layer a protective layer comprising a fluorine-containing lubricant such as a tetrafluoroethylene telomer and perfluoroalkyl polyether. Since the conventional fluorine-containing lubricant has poor interaction with the surface of the magnetic layer particularly one comprising a metallic magnetic material, it easily breaks off due to contact sliding on the magnetic head. Therefore, it is still desired to improve durabilty and corrosion resistance of the magnetic recording medium.
One object of the present invention is to provide a magnetic recording medium having improved durability and corrosion resistivity.
Another object of the invention is to provide a magnetic recording medium having on a magnetic layer a protective layer which does not easily break off, shows improved durability and prevents corrosion or oxidation of the magnetic layer.
According to the present invention, there is provided a magnetic recording medium comprising a substrate, a magnetic layer formed on the substrate and comprising a metallic magnetic material as a recording element and a protective layer formed on the magnetic layer and comprising a perfluoroalkyl polyether derivative having a phosphate terminal group.
Specific examples of the perfluoroalkyl polyether derivative having a phosphate terminal group are those represented by the formula: ##STR1## wherein A is a group of the formula:
--[CF(CF3)--CF2 O]--,
--(CF2 CF2 O)-- or
--(CF2 O)--
B is a group of the formula:
--(CF2 COO)-- or
--[CF(CF3)--COO]--
X is hydrogen or fluorine, R is hydrogen, fluorine, methyl, trifluoromethyl or chloromethyl, n is an integer of 10 to 50, preferably 20 to 40 and m is an integer of 1 to 50, preferably 5 to 30.
Since the perfluoroalkyl polyether derivative used in the invention has a phosphate terminal group which has good affinity to the magnetic layer containing the hydrophilic metallic magnetic material as the recording element, the phosphate group is strongly oriented to and absorbed by the surface of the magnetic layer. Therefore, the absorption on the magnetic layer is improved and the break off of the protective layer in use is effectively prevented. Since in the protective layer, perfluoroalkyl group is oriented in a direction opposite to the magnetic layer, its lubrication effect and water- and oil-repellency are exerted on the surface of the protective layer. Therefore, the perfluoroalkyl polyether derivative is strongly bound to the magnetic layer to form the protective layer having good lubricity. Thus, the protective layer is not easily abrased by the magnetic head in use and the durability and corrosion resistivity of the magnetic recording medium are greatly improved.
In addition, the protective layer comprising the perfluoroalkyl polyether derivative smooths the surface of the recording medium, which makes a gap between the magnetic head and the recording medium uniform and reduces drop out and spacing loss. Due to this, the characteristics of the recording medium for high density recording is effectively realized.
The perfluoroalkyl polyether derivative is applied on the magnetic layer by immersing the substrate having the magnetic layer in a solution of the polyether derivative in a suitable solvent such as toluene, halogenated hydrocarbons (e.g. Freon (trade mark)), and the like, or by coating or spray coating the magnetic layer with the solution, and then drying it to remove the solvent. The perfluoroalkyl polyether derivative may be used alone or as a mixture of two or more derivatives. The amount of the protective layer is preferably from 0.01 to 30 mg/m2, preferably from 0.1 to 10 mg/m2, more preferably from 0.2 to 5 mg/m2. If it is less that 0.01 mg/m2, the desired effect of the protective layer is not achieved. If it is more than 30 mg/m2, out put may decreases and/or the drop out may occur.
The magnetic layer may be formed on the substrate by a per se conventional method, for example, by coating a mixture of metal powder (e.g. Fe powder, Co powder, Fe-Ni powder, etc.), a binding resin and a suitable solvent on the substrate and drying it, or by metallizing, ion plating, sputtering or plating the ferromagnetic material (e.g. Co, Ni, Fe, Co-Ni, Co-Cr, Co-P, Co-Ni-P, etc.) on the substrate.
The magnetic recording medium of the invention includes all the conventional ones such as a magnetic tape which comprises, as the substrate, synthetic resin film (e.g. polyethylene terephthalate film, etc.), a magnetic disc having a disc shape substrate and a magnetic drum having a drum shape substrate.
The present invention will be hereinafter explained further in detail by following Examples.
A polyethylene terephthalate film of 12 microns in thickness was metallized with cobalt by a metallizing apparatus under a reduced pressure of 5×105 Torr to form a ferromagnetic metallic thin film of cobalt of 0.2 micron in thickness. Then, it was immersed in a 0.5 wt % solution of a fluorine-containing phosphate of the formula: ##STR2## (Phosmer FO manufactured by Uni Chemical Co., Ltd.) in Freon TF and dried. The amount of the coated phosphate was 0.8 mg/m2. The film was cut into a tape to form a magnetic tape.
In the same manner as in Example 1 but using a fluorine-containing phosphate of the formula: ##STR3## as a fluoroalkyl polyether derivative, a magnetic tape was produced. The amount of the coated phosphate was 0.8 mg/m2.
A following composition was dispersed in a ball mill for 72 hours to prepare a magnetic coating and coated on a polyethylene terephthalate film of 12 microns in thickness and dried to form a magnetic layer of 6 microns in thickness.
______________________________________ |
Composition Parts by weight |
______________________________________ |
Fe--Co magnetic powder |
80 |
Vinyl chloride/vinyl acetate/ |
16 |
vinyl alcohol copolymer |
(VAGH manufactured by U.C.C.) |
Urethane prepolymer 4 |
(Takenate L'1007 manufactured |
by Takeda Chemical Co., Ltd.) |
Methyl isobutyl ketone |
61 |
Toluene 61 |
______________________________________ |
The thus formed film having the magnetic layer was immersed in the same solution of the fluorine-containing phosphate as used in Example 1 to produce a magnetic tape. The amount of the coated phosphate was 1.6 mg/m2.
The polyester film having the magnetic layer formed in Example 3 was immersed in the same solution of the fluorine-containing phosphate as used in Example 2, a magnetic tape was produced. The amount of the coated phosphate was 1.5 mg/m2.
In the same manner as in Example 1 but using perfluroalkyl polyether (Krytox (trade mark) 143 manufacture by Du Pont) in place of the fluorine-containing phosphate, a magnetic tape was produced. The amount of the coated polyether was 0.5 mg/m2.
In the same manner as in Example 1 but using a fluorine-containing lubricant of the formula: ##STR4## in place of the fluorine-containing phosphate, a magnetic tape was produced. The amount of the coated lubricant was 0.6 mg/m2.
In the same manner as in Example 1, a polyethylene terephthalate film having the same magnetic layer was prepared, but any protective layer was not formed on the magnetic layer.
In the same manner as in Example 3 but using the same perfluroalkyl polyether used in Comparative Example 1 in place of the fluorine-containing phosphate, a magnetic tape was produced. The amount of the coated polyester was 1.1 mg/m2.
In the same manner as in Example 3 but using the same lubricant as used in Comparative Example 2 in place of the fluorine-containing phosphate, a magnetic tape was produced. The amount of the coated polyester was 1.3 mg/m2.
In the same manner as in Example 3, a polyethylene terephtjalate film having the same magnetic layer was prepared, but any protective layer was not formed on the magnetic layer.
Friction coefficient, durability and corrosion resistance of each of the magnetic tapes prepared in Examples or Comparative Examples were tested as follows:
Around a cylindrical pin of 4 mm in outer diameter having surface roughness or 0.2 s, the magnetic tape was wrapped at a wrapping angle of 150° and forwarded under load of 21 g at a rate of 1.4 cm/sec. The same part of the tape was repeatedly forwarded under the same conditions. After one, 100 and 1,000 times, the friction coefficient of the tape surface was measured.
The magnetic tape was run under head load of 5 g at a rate of 0.048 m/sec., and number of runs when output was decreased by 3 dB from the initial out put was counted.
The magnetic tape was kept standing at 60°C and relative humidity of 90%. At predetermined intervals, the maximum magnetic flux density of the recording tape was measured and compared with that of the tape before kept standing (100%).
The results are shown in following Table.
TABLE |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Dura- |
bility |
Maximum magnetic flux density |
Friction coefficient |
(No. of |
(%) |
1 time |
100 times |
1,000 times |
runs) |
3 days |
7 days |
30 days |
1 year |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Example 1 |
0.17 |
0.17 0.19 1,120 |
98 94 90 80 |
Example 2 |
0.18 |
0.18 0.21 1,180 |
98 93 89 77 |
Example 3 |
0.18 |
0.20 0.23 1,260 |
99 96 90 82 |
Example 4 |
0.17 |
0.19 0.21 1,320 |
99 95 91 83 |
Comparative |
0.20 |
0.22 0.25 980 |
98 90 86 73 |
Example 1 |
Comparative |
0.20 |
0.21 0.24 1,030 |
98 89 84 71 |
Example 2 |
Comparative |
0.62 |
0.86 0.93 90 |
90 81 73 52 |
Example 3 |
Comparative |
0.20 |
0.23 0.26 1,020 |
98 89 87 74 |
Example 4 |
Comparative |
0.19 |
0.22 0.25 1,050 |
98 89 85 74 |
Example 5 |
Comparative |
0.51 |
0.83 0.96 250 |
95 88 81 72 |
Example 6 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Saito, Osamu, Sumiya, Kenji, Togawa, Fumio
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4647507, | Oct 31 1984 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Magnetic recording material |
4671999, | Sep 19 1983 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Magnetic recording media having perfluoropolyether coating |
4696845, | Aug 27 1984 | NEC Corporation | Magnetic storage medium with lubricating coating |
4701375, | Jan 01 1983 | TDK Corporation | Magnetic recording medium |
4705699, | Sep 19 1983 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Method of coating magnetic recording media with perfluoropolyether compositions which are soluble in non-fluorinated solvents |
4729924, | Dec 21 1984 | THOMPSON, CARMEN M | Metallic thin film magnetic recording medium having a hard protective layer |
4794035, | Sep 10 1986 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Magnetic recording medium |
4803125, | Feb 18 1986 | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. | Magnetic recording medium |
4803130, | Dec 21 1984 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Reactive sputtering process for recording media |
4828924, | Oct 29 1985 | HITACHI, MAXELL, LTD | Magnetic recording medium |
4871625, | Apr 16 1987 | Hitachi Metals, Ltd.; Maruwa Bussan K.K. | Synthetic lubricant for lubricating thin film and magnetic recording medium |
5069973, | May 01 1985 | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. | Magnetic recording medium |
5082714, | Oct 07 1987 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Magnetic recording media |
5139876, | Mar 05 1990 | Cleveland State University | Ceramic article having wear resistant coating |
5395696, | Apr 10 1992 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Magnetic recording medium having a lubricant layer of a fluoroalkyl sulfo-compound |
5556707, | Mar 11 1994 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Magnetic recording medium having a lubricant comprising a phosphoric acid monoester and a fluorocarboxylic acid ester |
5691000, | Jun 14 1994 | Ausimont S.p.A. | Process for surface treatment of cellulosic, metallic, vitreous materials, or cements, marbles, granites and the like |
5707742, | Oct 07 1994 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Magnetic recording medium comprising a ferromagnetic metal thin film, protective layer, and an alkylamine perfluoropolyether lubricant |
5869186, | Sep 05 1994 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Magnetic recording medium |
5874169, | Mar 17 1997 | Seagate Technology LLC | Polymeric perfluoro polyether phosphate lubricant topcoat |
5900318, | Apr 08 1992 | NEC Corporation | Magnetic storage member |
6083626, | Apr 08 1992 | NEC Corporation | Magnetic storage member comprising a carbon layer and directly overcoated fluorolubricant layer |
6235689, | Jun 04 1996 | Seagate Technology LLC | Polymeric perfluoro polyether phosphate lubricant topcoat |
6559108, | Apr 07 1998 | THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC | Perfluoropolyether compounds as magnetic media lubricants |
6699485, | Aug 04 1999 | Ausimont S.p.A. | Cosmetic compositions |
6828284, | Aug 06 2001 | THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC | Flourinated compositions comprising phosphorus |
6875522, | Mar 09 2001 | SICPA HOLDING SA | Magnetic thin film interference device or pigment and method of making it, printing ink or coating composition, security document and use of such a magnetic thin film interference device |
7189408, | Aug 04 1999 | Solvay Solexis, S.p.A. | Cosmetic compositions |
9159350, | Jul 02 2014 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | High damping cap layer for magnetic recording media |
9886977, | Dec 22 2016 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | Dual cap layers for heat-assisted magnetic recording media |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3810874, | |||
4043926, | Nov 06 1975 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Lubricant composition |
4085137, | Mar 10 1969 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Poly(perfluoroalkylene oxide) derivatives |
4094911, | Mar 10 1969 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Poly(perfluoroalkylene oxide) derivatives |
4169904, | Jan 05 1978 | International Business Machines Corporation | Preparation of polymer monomolecular films |
4267238, | Dec 18 1979 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Flexible magnetic recording media lubricated with fluorinated telechelic polyether polymer |
4268556, | Jan 08 1979 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Rigid magnetic recording disks lubricated with fluorinated telechelic polyether |
4308063, | Sep 18 1975 | Daikin Kogyo Co., Ltd. | Mold release agent |
4327139, | Sep 11 1978 | EMTEC Magnetics GmbH | Rigid magnetic recording disk having perfluoropolyether lubricant |
4404247, | Jul 02 1982 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY A CORP OF DE | Protective covering for magnetic recording medium |
4431555, | Sep 14 1982 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Oxidation stable polyfluoroalkylether grease compositions |
4446193, | Apr 29 1983 | International Business Machines Corporation | Process for chemically bonding lubricant to an information carrier and products thereof |
4472480, | Jul 02 1982 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ST PAUL, MN A CORP OF | Low surface energy liner of perfluoropolyether |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 13 1984 | SUMIYA, KENJI | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004336 | /0104 | |
Nov 13 1984 | TOGAWA, FUMIO | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004336 | /0104 | |
Nov 13 1984 | SAITO, OSAMU | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004336 | /0104 | |
Nov 16 1984 | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 07 1988 | M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247. |
Oct 13 1988 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 03 1993 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 17 1993 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 17 1993 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Jun 22 1993 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 22 1993 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Mar 25 1997 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 17 1997 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 20 1988 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 1989 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 1989 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 20 1991 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 20 1992 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 1993 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 1993 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 20 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 20 1996 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 1997 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 1997 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 20 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |