A method for altering the radius of curvature of the cornea which includes the steps of making incisions into the cornea and affixing a rigid gas permeable contact lens, having predetermined radius of curvature, to the eye to have the cornea conform to the shape of the lens.

Patent
   4565198
Priority
Dec 27 1983
Filed
Dec 27 1983
Issued
Jan 21 1986
Expiry
Dec 27 2003
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
40
8
EXPIRED
1. A method for altering the radius of curvature of a cornea comprising the steps of
a, measuring the corneal curvature with a keratometer;
b, calculating the correction factor necessary to obtain proper focusing;
c, making sufficient incisions into the cornea to allow reduction of its curvature as determined by the correction factor calculated in step b;
d, placing a rigid gas permeable contact lens, having a radius of curvature, on the eye, said radius having been determined by using the correction factor calculated in step b;
e, applying light pressure on the contact lens by bandaging technique or surgical suturing so that the cornea will conform to the shape of the lens;
f, allowing the cornea to heal under the applied pressure; and
g, after healing, removing the contact lens from the eye.
2. A method of decreasing the radius of curvature of a cornea comprising the steps of:
a, measuring the corneal curvature with a keratometer;
b, calculating the correction factor necessary to obtain proper focusing;
c, removing, by cutting, at least one wedge of the cornea in the flattest meridian on both sides of the pupil to allow reduction of the curvature of the cornea as determined by the correction factor calculated in step b;
d, placing a corrective rigid, gas permeable contact lens onto the cornea, said corrective rigid, gas permeable contact lens having a radius that has been determined by using the correction factor calculated in step b;
e, applying sufficient pressure on the contact lens by bandaging technique or surgical suturing to effect closing of the wedges;
f, allowing the cornea to heal under the applied pressure; and
g, after healing, removing the contact lens from the cornea.

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to correcting vision defects, such as myopia, and more particularly to changing the radius of curvature of the cornea.

In the normal eye visual perception involves the process of light entering the eye, passing through the cornea and lens converging on the retina at the back of the eyeball. Electrical impulses then transmit a sharp image to the brain.

The common vision problem myopia, or nearsightedness, is a congenital refractive error manifesting itself in the eye's inability to focus light images directly on the retina. Due to the eyeball either being too long or the cornea too curved, the light rays entering the eye converge in front of the retina resulting in the transmission of the brain an "out of focus" image ranging in severity from a mild inconvenience to a debilitating handicap. Ordinarily, myopia can be corrected by corrective lenses, such as eye glasses or contact lenses. However, for many people corrective eyewear is a handicap. Also, when the myopia problem of the eye is the result of a progressive disease such as keratoconus, corrective eye glasses are satisfactory only in the early phases of the disease. Later, when the protrusion of the cornea advances further, contact lens fitting becomes more and more difficult, ultimately necessitating surgery as the only treatment of choice for sight restoration.

2. Description of the Prior Art

Various approaches and devices have been utilized by the prior art for correcting corneal curvature and associated conditions such as myopia, astigmatism and keratoconus. Such approaches included implantation of artificial lenses, implantation of donor's cornea, surgical incisions into the anterior cornea, radio frequency probes, lasers and the like.

One very promising surgical procedure for correcting corneal curvature is radial keratotomy which consists of a series of microsurgical incisions, placed in a radial pattern on the surface of the cornea. The rational for the procedure is as follows. The cornea, being of a dome shape, is being supported by both the limbus and the intraocular pressure. As a result of the microsurgical incisions, the integrity of the cornea decreases resulting in stretching and flattening under the influence of the intraocular pressure. Although initially there appears to be peripheral bulging with central flattening, upon completion of healing the cornea becomes smooth, uniform and as strong as it was prior to the operation. In reducing the curvature of the cornea the result is an improved focusing of the light rays on the retina hence reduction or elimination of myopia. There are, however, clinical variables which influence the success of the surgical procedure, such as intraocular pressure, the radius of corneal curvature and the number of depth of microsurgical incisions made on the cornea. The precise measurement of the variables that affect the outcome is difficult at best. Often, it becomes necessary to repeat the operation in order to further reduce the curvature of the cornea and improve "focusing". One of the most sophisticated techniques in controlling the clinical variables includes the utilization of a special micrometric knife which makes it possible to regulate the incision depth with high precision. The necessary depth of the incision is set according to the degree of myopia, corneal thickness and rigidity, and corneal curvature radius. The expected effect of surgery, given the diameter of the central optical zone, number of incisions and their depth, can then be predicted preoperatively by a computer. While this surgical procedure utilizing the latest instrumental techniques has proved more successful than previous techniques, the lack of predictability of the shape and curvature of the cornea still persists. Obtaining the proper diopter correction is still "an art" and after the healing of the cornea the patient may still be required to wear eye or contact lenses. This lack of reliable predictability greatly hinders the use of this surgical procedure except in serious cases where no other intervention is available.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a reliable method for vision correction.

FIG. 1 is a horizontal schematic cross-section through an eyeball;

FIG. 2 is a horizontal schematic cross-section through the eyeball showing a portion thereof;

FIG. 3 is a cross-section of the contact lens and cornea showing conformity of the latter to the former; and

FIG. 4 is a horizontal schematic cross-section through an eyeball having had the corrective surgery of the present invention, showing the incisions in the cornea and the contact lens pressed against the cornea.

in FIG. 1, there is illustrated a schematic horizontal cross-section of a human eye having myopia where the numerals represent the following parts of the eye: cornea - 10, pupil - 12, lens - 14, iris - 16, retina - 18, and focal point - 20 at which light rays focus inside the eye. The focal point is substantially distant from the retina resulting in blurred vision. The closer the focal point is to the retina, the clearer the vision becomes.

In FIG. 2, there is illustrated a schematic horizontal cross-section of a human eye showing a part thereof, wherein like numerals represent parts of the eye described in FIG. 1, while the numeral 22 represents incisions in the cornea 10.

In FIG. 3, there is illustrated the cornea 10 having incisions 22 and contact lens 24 pressed against cornea 10 so that the same conforms to the configuration of the lens. The contact lens 24 being pressed against the cornea 10 results in the flattening of the cornea.

FIG. 4 illustrates the desirable consequence of the flattened cornea: the focal point of light rays falls onto the retina.

Briefly stated, the invention concerns a method of correcting the curvature of the cornea comprising the steps of:

a. making incisions into the cornea using microsurgical technique;

b. affixing a rigid gas permeable contact lens, having a predetermined radius of curvature, to the eye following surgery;

c. applying light pressure on the contact lens so that the cornea will conform to the shape of the lens;

d. allowing the cornea to heal under the applied pressure; and

e. after healing, removing the contact lens from the eye.

In accordance with the present invention, measurements with a Keratometer of the corneal curvature is made and the correction factor necessary to obtain proper focusing is calculated. Based on the calculated result, the corrective corneal lens having the necessary diopter is selected for use following the operation.

The lens used in the method of the present invention should have a diameter of between 10.5 to 12.00 mm and should have an aspheric type base curve with an optical zone of about 6.0 mm. The optical zone of the lens should have sufficient rigidity to resist flexing or warping.

The lens used in the method of the present invention may be fabricated from rigid plastic materials such as hydrophobic acrylic-type polymers as polymethyl methacrylate and the like. Lenses of this type have been known for many years and their fabrication technique is well known in the prior art.

The lens used in the method of the present invention may also be fabricated from semi-rigid polymeric materials such as cellulose acetobutyrate, and silicone rubber.

Soft contact lens materials consisting of hydrogels of hydrophobic polymers may also be used for fabricating corrective cornea lenses when the diopter required to obtain corrected vision is small.

The lenses are conventionally made by marching blanks or disks obtained by polymerizing a synthetic monomeric composition. The machining operation imparts the final shape with the required optical properties to the lenses.

The preferred method of accomplishing the objective of the present invention includes cutting out a wedge of the cornea in the flattest meridian on both sides of the pupil followed by placing the corrective contact lens on the cornea and applying sufficient pressure thereon so that the wedges will close. The contact lens may be affixed to the cornea surgically (such as suturing) or by bandaging the eye using conventional eye bandaging techniques. The number of incisions may be increased when necessary to accomodate the cornea upon stretching due to the pressure exerted thereon by the contact lens. The number and kind of incisions is determined by the operating surgeon from the readings of the keratometer, the internal pressure of the eye and other data obtained from the examination of the patient's eye.

The lens is maintained affixed to the patient's eye until the epithelium heals, usually within four to six days.

Koeniger, Erich A.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10555805, Feb 24 2006 RVO 2 0, INC Anterior corneal shapes and methods of providing the shapes
10583041, Mar 12 2015 RVO 2 0, INC Methods of correcting vision
10835371, Feb 24 2006 RVO 2 0, INC, D B A OPTICS MEDICAL Small diameter corneal inlay methods
4662881, Jan 21 1986 Epikeratophakia process
4807623, May 30 1986 David M., Lieberman Device for simultaneously forming two incisions along a path on an eye
4994081, Oct 16 1986 CBS Lens Method for locating on a cornea an artificial lens fabricated from a collagen-hydrogel for promoting epithelial cell growth
5112350, Oct 16 1986 CBS Lens, a California general partnership Method for locating on a cornea an artificial lens fabricated from a collagen-hydrogel for promoting epithelial cell growth and regeneration of the stroma
5163956, Nov 06 1990 ANGIOTECH BIOMATERIALS CORPORATION Methods and lenticules for modifying the cornea
5288436, Nov 06 1990 General Electric Company Methods of fabricating a collagen lenticule precursor for modifying the cornea
5318047, Jan 14 1992 ADDITION TECHNOLOGY, INC Method for corneal curvature variation
5466260, Sep 21 1992 ADDITION TECHNOLOGY, INC Adjustable devices for corneal curvature adjustment
5653752, Feb 28 1995 ADDITION TECHNOLOGY, INC Adjustable devices for corneal curvature adjustment
5693092, Sep 21 1992 ADDITION TECHNOLOGY, INC Adjustable devices for corneal curvature adjustment
5693093, Sep 28 1992 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Ophthalmic lens with reduced edge glare
5755786, Sep 28 1992 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Ophthalmic lens with reduced edge glare
6045577, Sep 28 1992 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Ophthalmic lens with reduced edge glare
6051023, Jun 15 1987 ADDITION TECHNOLOGY, INC Corneal curvature adjustment ring and apparatus for making a cornea
6264692, Sep 28 1992 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Ophthalmic lens with reduced edge glare and method of making
6342053, Jul 23 1990 RJW ACQUISTIONS, L C , D B A 20 20 TECHNOLOGIES, INC Apparatus for cornea reshaping
6966927, Aug 07 1992 ADDITION TECHNOLOGY, INC Hybrid intrastromal corneal ring
7166117, Feb 07 1996 Automatic surgical device and control assembly for cutting a cornea
7776086, Apr 30 2004 REVISION OPTICS, INC Aspherical corneal implant
7780689, Apr 07 2003 Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH Bar-link drive system for a microkeratome
8057541, Feb 24 2006 REVISION OPTICS, INC Method of using small diameter intracorneal inlays to treat visual impairment
8162953, Mar 28 2007 REVISION OPTICS, INC Insertion system for corneal implants
8469948, Aug 23 2010 REVISION OPTICS, INC Methods and devices for forming corneal channels
8540727, Mar 28 2007 ReVision Optics, Inc. Insertion system for corneal implants
8668735, Sep 12 2000 REVISION OPTICS, INC Corneal implant storage and delivery devices
8900296, Apr 20 2007 RVO 2 0, INC, D B A OPTICS MEDICAL Corneal inlay design and methods of correcting vision
9005280, Sep 12 2000 ReVision Optics, Inc. System for packaging and handling an implant and method of use
9271828, Mar 28 2007 REVISION OPTICS, INC Corneal implant retaining devices and methods of use
9345569, Oct 21 2011 REVISION OPTICS, INC Corneal implant storage and delivery devices
9539143, Mar 12 2015 REVISION OPTICS, INC Methods of correcting vision
9549848, Mar 28 2007 REVISION OPTICS, INC Corneal implant inserters and methods of use
9877823, Sep 16 2011 ReVision Optics, Inc. Corneal implant retaining devices and methods of use
9889000, Sep 12 2000 ReVision Optics, Inc. Corneal implant applicators
9987124, Oct 21 2011 ReVision Optics, Inc. Corneal implant storage and delivery devices
D349576, May 26 1993 Sunbeam Products, Inc Massager
D349771, May 26 1993 Sunbeam Products, Inc Massager
RE35974, Jan 14 1992 ADDITION TECHNOLOGY, INC Method for corneal curvature variations
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3488111,
3831604,
4126904, Mar 31 1977 Artificial lens and method of locating on the cornea
4298004, Feb 27 1979 Surgical method for altering the curvature of the cornea of rabbits
4327450, Feb 09 1981 Method of intraocular implanting an artificial lens
4343787, Jul 29 1975 Merck & Co., Inc. Shaped ophthalmic inserts for treating dry eye syndrome
4346482, Jan 22 1981 Living contact lens
4406285, Jan 23 1981 Richard A., Villasenor Manual radial and chordal keratotometry apparatus
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Dec 16 1983KOENIGER, ERICH A BARNES-HIND HYDROCURVE, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0042130507 pdf
Dec 27 1983Barnes-Hind, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Aug 22 1989REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jan 21 1990EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jan 21 19894 years fee payment window open
Jul 21 19896 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 21 1990patent expiry (for year 4)
Jan 21 19922 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jan 21 19938 years fee payment window open
Jul 21 19936 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 21 1994patent expiry (for year 8)
Jan 21 19962 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jan 21 199712 years fee payment window open
Jul 21 19976 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 21 1998patent expiry (for year 12)
Jan 21 20002 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)