A method is provided for preparing a mixture of lower aliphatic alcohols characterized by containing a substantial proportion of aliphatic alcohols having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms by reacting a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen under suitable conditions of temperature and pressure in the presence of a catalyst comprising molybdenum, a metal from the group consisting of cobalt, iron and nickel, and copper, said catalyst being modified by the addition of a promoter from the class consisting of potassium, cesium and rubidium, said promoter being employed at a concentration ranging from about 1.8 to 13.0 micromoles of said alkali per square meter of surface area of said catalyst.
|
1. A method for preparing lower aliphatic alcohols characterized by producing a substantial proportion of aliphatic alcohols having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms which comprises reacting carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst at a temperature from about 240° to about 400°C, a pressure from about 500 to about 3000 psi and a gas hourly space velocity of at least 1000, said catalyst comprising from about 5 to about 50 weight percent of molybdenum calculated as MoO3, from about 0.3 to about 15 weight percent of a metal selected from the group consisting of cobalt, iron and nickel, calculated as CoO, Fe2 O3 or NiO, respectively, and from about 1.5 to 8 weight percent of copper, calculated as CuO, and the balance a support, said catalyst being modified by the addition of an alkali metal promoter from the class consisting of potassium, cesium and rubidium in an amount ranging from about 1.8 to 13.0 micromoles of said alkali metal per square meter of catalyst surface area.
20. A method for preparing lower aliphatic alcohols in which the weight ratio of the C2 -C6 alcohols to methanol is greater than 1 which comprises reacting carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst at a temperature from about 270° to 360°C, a pressure from about 750 to 2500 psi and a gas hourly space velocity in the range from about 10,000 to 30,000, said catalyst comprising from about 7 to 30 weight percent of molybdenum calculated as MoO3, from about 0.5 to 10 weight percent of a metal or mixture of metals selected from the group consisting of cobalt, iron and nickel calculated as CoO, Fe2 O3 or NiO respectively, and from about 2 to 6 weight percent of copper calculated as CuO, and the balance an alumina support, said catalyst being modified by the addition of an alkali metal promoter from the class consisting of potassium, cesium and rubidium in an amount ranging from about 2.2 to 10.0 micromoles of said alkali metal per square meter of catalyst surface area.
2. A method according to
3. A method according to
4. A method according to
5. A method according to
6. A method according to
7. A method according to
8. A method according to
9. A method according to
10. A method according to
11. A method according to
12. A method according to
13. A method according to
14. A method according to
15. A method according to
16. A method according to
17. A method according to
18. A method according to
19. A method according to
21. A method according to
22. A method according to
23. A method according to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a process for preparing lower aliphatic alcohols. More particularly, this invention relates to the production of a mixture of lower aliphatic alcohols characterized by containing a substantial proportion of alcohols having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms.
Lower aliphatic alcohols have been proposed as fuel extenders or as replacements for gasoline for fueling internal combustion engines. Certain mixtures of lower aliphatic alcohols have the EPA approval for use and are currently being marketed in the United States. The lower aliphatic alcohols can be produced from domestically available non-petroleum sources, and their use in fuels would serve to lessen the dependence of the nation on imported petroleum and petroleum products.
Hydrogen and carbon monoxide, or a synthesis gas mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, can be reacted to form lower aliphatic alcohols. The synthesis gas feed stream can be produced from non-petroleum sources, such as coal, biomass or other hydrocarbonaceous materials. The synthesis gas mixture itself is produced in a partial oxidation reaction of the hydrocarbonaceous material in commercially available processes such as coal gasification.
Numerous catalytic processes have been studied in attempts to provide a viable process for the production of aliphatic alcohols from synthesis gas or from a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Heretofore, the emphasis has been primarily directed to the production of methanol. In contrast, the present process is directed to a method for producing an alchol mixture containing a substantial amount of aliphatic alcohols having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms. Under selected reaction conditions, this process is effective for producing a fraction of higher aliphatic alcohols, i.e. an alcohol fraction consisting of C2 to C6 alcohols, which represents the major or predominant alcohol production in this process.
2. Disclosure Statement
U.S. Pat. No. 1,201,850 discloses a method for the production of hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds of hydrocarbons by passing an oxide of carbon and hydrogen over a heated catalytic agent under a pressure exceeding 5 atmospheres. A number of catalytic materials are disclosed as well as the fact that a basic compound, such as an alkaline metal hydroxide, can be used with the prescribed catalytic agents.
U.S. Pat. No. 1,625,929 discloses a process for producing methanol in which the catalyst contains copper, cobalt and a metallic halide.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,345,427 discloses a dehydrogenation catalyst and process in which the catalyst consists of nickel, molybdenum and alkali metal oxides on an alumina support.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,096,164 discloses a process for reacting hydrogen and carbon monoxide in the presence of a solid catalyst comprising rhodium with molybdenum or tungsten to produce two carbon atom oxygenated hydrocarbons in which ethanol is the major component.
U.S. Pat. No 4,199,522 discloses a Fischer-Tropsch process for producing olefins and this disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,235,801 and 4,246,186 disclose the production of alcohols from a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of a rhenium catalyst.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,380,589 discloses a Fischer-Tropsch process for producing hydrocarbons with improved selectivity to C2 -C4 olefins by contacting hydrogen and carbon monoxide in the presence of a catalyst. The catalyst disclosed comprises molybdenum, a promoter comprising alkali or alkaline earth metal, and a binder comprising an iron-containing calcium aluminate cement.
EPA 119609 discloses a process for producing alcohols from synthesis gas using a catalyst containing molybdenum with tungsten, rhenium and an alkali metal. This disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. E.P. 79132 discloses a similar process in which the catalyst contains rhenium, molybdenum and potassium.
Co-assigned application Ser. No. 728,636 filed on Apr. 29, 1985 is directed to a process for producing lower aliphatic alcohols from a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen and its disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
Previous catalytic processes have been notably effective for converting carbon monoxide and hydrogen feedstocks into hydrocarbons or methanol, but none have been particularly effective for providing high yields of a lower aliphatic alcohol mixture characterized by having a substantial or greater weight amount of alcohols having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms as compared to the co-produced methanol.
It has been discovered that a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen can be reacted to form a mixture of lower aliphatic alcohols containing a substantial amount of aliphatic alcohols having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms. This reaction is conducted by contacting a feed mixture such as synthesis gas with a novel catalyst composition which exhibits good selectivity for the production of C2 -C6 aliphatic alcohols under suitable conditions of temperature and pressure. The effective catalyst composition comprises a mixture of molybdenum, a metal from the group consisting of cobalt, iron and nickel, and copper. This metal catalyst composition is modified by the addition of a critical amount of an alkali metal promoter from the class consisting of potassium, cesium and rubidium in an amount ranging from about 1.8 to 13.0 micromoles of alkali per square meter of surface area of the catalyst thereby forming a promoted or modified catalyst.
In accordance with this invention, a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen as, for example, a synthesis gas mixture of said reactants, is reacted over a catalyst comprising molybdenum, a metal from the group consisting of cobalt, iron and nickel, and copper, which has been modified by the addition of a promoter from the group consisting of potassium, cesium and rubidium, said promoter being employed at a concentration ranging from about 1.8 to 13.0 micromoles of alkali per square meter of surface area of the catalyst. The nature and the concentration of the promoter on the catalyst are critical. Concentrations of promoter outside of the prescribed range result in a sharp reduction in the effectiveness of this process.
In a commonly assigned copending application Ser. No. 728,636 filed on Apr. 29, 1985, it has been shown that the critical concentration range for the alkali promoter is an amount from about 1.8 to 13.0 micromoles of alkali per square meter of surface area of the catalyst. A preferred alkali promoter concentration is from 2.2 to 10.0 micromoles of alkali per square meter of catalyst surface area with the most preferred alkali promoter concentration being from about 2.5 to about 9.0 micromoles of alkali per square meter of catalyst surface area.
The catalyst can be prepared in a number of ways known in the art. In general, the use of a catalyst support or carrier comprising a relatively refractory, porous, adsorptive and high surface area material is preferred. Conventional carriers or supports, such as alumina, silica, titania, magnesia, silica-alumina and boron phosphates, are suitable support materials for preparing the catalyst for this process. The disclosure in U.S. Pat. No. 4,098,683 is illustrative and is incorporated herein by reference.
A preferred method for preparing the catalyst is to impregnate a carrier, such as alumina, with a source of molybdenum generally in the form of a soluble salt, then with a metal from the class of cobalt, nickel and iron, generally also in the form of a soluble salt and finally with copper in the form of a soluble salt. The impregnation of the carrier with the catalyst metals can be done simultaneously or step-wise. The impregnated carrier is dried and then calcined according to known procedures.
It is essential that the catalyst be modified, i.e. treated or impregnated, with an alkali metal promoter from the group of potassium, cesium or rubidium generally in the form of a salt. The treated or modified catalyst is then subjected to reduction with hydrogen gas generally by heating the promoted catalyst at a temperature between about 300° and 500°C for an extended period, usually 2 to 8 hours.
The catalyst comprises from about 5 to 50 weight percent of molybdenum calculated as molybdenum trioxide, from about 0.3 to 15 weight percent of a metal from the group consisting of cobalt, nickel and iron calculated as the respective oxide CoO, NiO or Fe2 O3 or mixtures thereof, and from about 1.5 to 8 weight percent of copper as copper oxide (CuO), with the balance being the support. A preferred catalyst composition comprises from about 7 to 30 weight percent of molybdenum trioxide, from about 0.5 to 10 weight percent of cobalt, nickel, or iron oxide or a combination thereof and from about 2 to 6 weight percent of copper. Still more preferred is a catalyst comprising from about 7 to 12 weight percent molybdenum, from about 1.5 to 5 weight percent of a metal from the group consisting of cobalt, iron and nickel or a mixture thereof and from about 2.5 to 5 weight percent of copper, all calculated as hereinabove described.
The catalyst should have a surface area of 125 m2 /gm (square meters per gram of catalyst) or more. A more effective catalyst will have a surface area from about 150 to 350 m2 /gm and the most preferred will have a surface area from about 160 to 300 m2 /gm.
Alternatively, a commercially available catalyst comprising molybdenum, one or more of the metals from the class consisting of cobalt, nickel and iron, and copper meeting the foregoing specifications can be impregnated or modified by treatment with the prescribed alkali metal and then reduced under hydrogen and treated as noted above.
The carbon monoxide and hydrogen employed to form the lower aliphatic alcohols in this process can be provided from any available source. One particularly useful source is synthesis gas produced in the gasification of hydrocarbonaceous materials, such as coals and biomass. An effective gasification process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,544,291 wherein a hydrocarbonaceous fuel is partially oxidized with a free oxygen-containing gas in a gas generator. In general, the mole ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide employed in this process should range from about 0.1 to 50 moles of hydrogen per mole of carbon monoxide with the preferred ratio being from about 0.5 to 20 moles of hydrogen per mole of carbon monoxide.
The reaction conditions for effecting the conversion of the carbon monoxide-hydrogen feed into lower aliphatic alcohols employing the prescribed catalyst of the invention include a reaction temperature ranging from about 240° to about 400°C with a preferred temperature range being from about 270° to 360°C and the most preferred temperature being from about 290° to about 350°C The effective pressure range for this process is from about 3.4×106 Pa (500 psi) to about 2.4×107 Pa (3500 psi). The preferred pressure range is from about 5.1×106 Pa (750 psi) to about 1.7×107 Pa (2500 psi).
The space velocity employed to effect the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen over the prescribed catalyst to the aliphatic alcohols is a vital feature of this process. In general, the space velocity, that is the volume of gas passed through a given volume of catalyst per hour expressed as GHSV(hr-1), must be at least 1000. A preferred range is from about 5000 to about 50,000. A highly effective process is realized when the space velocity employed ranges from about 10,000 to about 30,000. Under preferred conditions the ratio of weight percent of C2 -C6 alcohols to weight percent methanol can exceed 1, and more preferably can be from 1.25 to 2.
The present invention is more fully described in the following Examples. The reactor used for this work was a 1" I.D. type 316 stainless steel tube. 10 cc of the catalyst was diluted with 90 cc of alpha alumina and packed into the reactor. The catalyst was reduced for 4 hours, at 400°C at a pressure of 1500 psig with a flow of hydrogen gas at 2.5 liters per minute. The catalyst was then cooled to reaction temperature and subjected to a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a ratio of 2:1, at a pressure of 1500 psig and a GHSV of 28,000 hr-1.
The product emerging from the reactor was sent through a condensor which liquefied the alcohols and water products. The resulting liquid was analyzed by gas chromatography. The non-condensable gas was also analyzed by gas chromatography.
The selectivity to hydrocarbons, methanol, and alcohols containing 2 to 6 carbon atoms is set forth in the table. The alcohol production in grams of alcohol per gram of catalyst per hour is also set forth in the table. Selectivity is defined as the percentage of carbon atoms converted from carbon monoxide to a specified compound or compounds.
A promoted catalyst was prepared by impregnating a commercially available catalyst comprising cobalt and molybdenum on an alumina carrier first with a solution of copper nitrate, and after calcination with a solution of potassium carbonate. The commercial catalyst was made by Armak catalyst division, Pasadena, Tex. and sold under the name Ketjen KF 124 LD. The copper nitrate solution was made by dissolving 1.2 grams of copper nitrate in 50 cc of distilled water which was then added to 98.8 grams of the catalyst. The impregnated catalyst was then dried and calcined at 450°C for several hours. After calcination a solution of 5.9 grams of potassium carbonate, in distilled water, was added to 33.0 grams of the calcined catalyst. This was then dried in a nitrogen purged vacuum oven at 135°C for several hours. The chemical analysis of the catalyst is set forth in the table under Example 1.
A second promoted catalyst was made as in example 1, however, the catalyst was impregnated with a solution made by dissolving 4.8 grams of copper nitrate in 50 cc of distilled water, which was added to 95.2 grams of the catalyst. After drying and calcination a solution of 5.6 grams of potassium carbonate, dissolved in distilled water, was added to 32 grams of the calcined catalyst. This was then dried in a vacuum oven for several hours. The chemical analysis of the catalyst is set forth in the table under example 2.
A promoted catalyst was made as in example 1, however, the catalyst was impregnated with a solution made by dissolving 9.5 grams of copper nitrate in 50 cc of distilled water, which was added to 90.5 grams of the catalyst. After drying and calcination a solution of 5.1 grams of potassium carbonate, dissolved in distilled water, was added to 29.0 grams of the calcined catalyst. The catalyst was then dried in a vacuum oven at 135°C for several hours. The chemical analysis of this catalyst is set forth in the table under example 3.
A promoted catalyst was made as in example 1, however, the catalyst was impregnated with a solution made by dissolving 18.2 grams of copper nitrate in 60 cc of distilled water, which was added to 81.0 grams of the catalyst. After drying and calcination a solution of 13.1 grams of potassium carbonate, dissolved in distilled water, was added to the calcined catalyst. The catalyst was then dried at 125°C for several hours. The chemical analysis of this catalyst is set forth in the table under example 4.
This catalyst was tested in a 0.5 liter stainless steel Berty type recirculating gradientless reactor from Autoclave Engineers. 20 cc of catalyst was used. The conditions for the test were the same as those previously described except that the hydrogen flow during reduction was 5 liters per minute instead of 2.5 liters per minute.
A promoted catalyst was made as in example 1, however, no copper nitrate was added. 30 grams of potassium carbonate, dissolved in 90 cc of distilled water was added to 170 grams of the base catalyst (KF 124 LD). This was then dried at 135°C for several hours. The chemical analysis of this catalyst is set forth in the table under example 4.
| TABLE I |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| EXAMPLE |
| 5 |
| 1 2 3 4 (Comp.) |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| Catalyst Composition |
| Wt. % |
| MoO3 9.9 9.5 9.5 8.7 9.7 |
| CoO 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.0 3.1 |
| CuO 0.4 1.7 3.4 6.2 -- |
| Al2 O3 |
| 78.3 77.9 75.7 73.1 78.3 |
| K2 O 8.0 7.5 8.0 9.0 8.9 |
| H2 /CO Ratio |
| 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 |
| Temperature °C. |
| 343 343 343 343 343 |
| GHSV (HR-1) |
| 28,000 |
| 28,000 |
| 28,000 |
| 28,000 |
| 28,000 |
| Pressure Pa 1 × 107 |
| 1 × 107 |
| 1 × 107 |
| 1 × 107 |
| 1 × 107 |
| ##STR1## 6.2 5.8 6.2 6.9 6.9 |
| Selectivity (%) To: |
| CO2 48 51 42 48 46 |
| C1 -C6 Hydrocarbons |
| 20 21 21 32 31 |
| MeOH 12 10 14 7 7 |
| C2 -C6 Alcohols |
| 19 17 22 13 17 |
| Alcohol Production |
| 0.24 0.35 0.50 0.42 0.27 |
| (G/G-hr) |
| ##STR2## 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.4 |
| C2 + Alc. Prod. (G/G-hr) |
| 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.27 0.19 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
The foregoing examples demonstrate that a process for the production of lower aliphatic alcohols from a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen within the critical parameters for the prescribed catalyst modified or promoted with the specified alkali metal is effective for producing a high yield of C2 -C6 aliphatic alcohols in relation to the production of methanol.
Storm, David A., Grazioso, Michael V., Kerr, deceased, Edwin R., Love, Richard F.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4749724, | Mar 18 1983 | The Dow Chemical Company | Process for producing alcohols from synthesis gas |
| 4752622, | Jul 30 1984 | The Dow Chemical Company | Process for producing alcohols from synthesis gas |
| 4831060, | Jul 30 1984 | The Dow Chemical Company | Mixed alcohols production from syngas |
| 4882360, | Jul 30 1984 | The Dow Chemical Company | Process for producing alcohols from synthesis gas |
| 4983638, | Jul 17 1989 | TEXACO INC , A CORP OF DE | Catalyst and method for producing lower aliphatic alcohols |
| 7745372, | Dec 22 2003 | China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation; RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM PROCESSING, SINOPEC | Catalyst for selective hydrogenation of olefins and its preparation as well as use |
| 8129436, | Apr 13 2006 | Dow Global Technologies LLC | Mixed alcohol synthesis with enhanced carbon value use |
| 8142530, | Jul 09 2007 | HAAKON, LLC | Methods and apparatus for producing syngas and alcohols |
| 8153027, | Jul 09 2007 | HAAKON, LLC | Methods for producing syngas |
| 8598239, | Oct 11 2010 | Dow Global Technologies LLC | Anderson-type heteropoly compound-based catalyst compositions and their use conversion of synthesis gas to oxygenates |
| 8614258, | Oct 11 2010 | Dow Global Technologies LLC | Keggin-type structure heteropoly compound-based catalyst compositions and their use in conversion of synthesis gas to oxygenates |
| 9227895, | Jul 09 2007 | KETJEN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Methods and apparatus for producing alcohols from syngas |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| CA1155463, | |||
| FR660678, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jun 21 1985 | GRAZIOSO, MICHAEL V | TEXACO INC , A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004434 | /0370 | |
| Jun 21 1985 | STORM, DAVID A | TEXACO INC , A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004434 | /0370 | |
| Jun 26 1985 | LOVE, RICHARD F | TEXACO INC , A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004434 | /0370 | |
| Jul 15 1985 | KERR, MYRA L FOR THE ESTATE OF EDWIN R KERR, DEC D | TEXACO INC , A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004434 | /0370 | |
| Jul 22 1985 | Texaco Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Feb 08 1990 | M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247. |
| Feb 15 1990 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| May 17 1994 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Oct 09 1994 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 07 1989 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 07 1990 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 07 1990 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 07 1992 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 07 1993 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 07 1994 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 07 1994 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 07 1996 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 07 1997 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 07 1998 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 07 1998 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 07 2000 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |