A compound of the formula: ##STR1## useful as a fungicidal agent against phytopathogenic fungi, and particularly against strains resistant to benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides.

Patent
   4647583
Priority
Jan 12 1983
Filed
Apr 15 1983
Issued
Mar 03 1987
Expiry
Mar 03 2004
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
1
3
EXPIRED
1. A compound of the formula: ##STR89## wherein X and Y are, the same or different, each a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, a lower alkyl group, a lower alkoxy group or a group of the formula: ##STR90## in which R is a lower alkyl group, X and Y being simultaneously not hydrogen; R' is a cyano group or a lower cyanoalkyl group; and R" is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower alkynyl group, a lower haloalkyl group or a lower alkoxy (lower) alkyl group.
2. The compound of claim 1, which is represented by the formula: ##STR91##
3. A fungicidal composition which comprises as an essential active ingredient a fungicidally effective amount of a compound according to claim 1, and an inert carrier or diluent.
4. A method for controlling plant pathogenic fungi which comprises applying a fungicidally effective amount of at least one compound according to claim 1 to plant pathogenic fungi.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the plant pathogenic fungi is the drug-resistant strain.

This invention relates to fungicidal aniline derivatives.

Benzimidazole and thiophanate fungicides such as Benomyl (methyl 1-(butylcarbamoyl)benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate), Fubelidazol (2-(2-furyl)benzimidazole), Thiabendazole (2-(4-thiazolyl)benzimidazole), Carbendazim (methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate), Thiophanate-methyl (1,2-bis(3methoxycarbonyl-2-thioureido)benzene), Thiophanate (1,2-bis(3-ethoxycarbonyl-2-thioureido)benzene), 2-(O,S-dimethylphosphorylamino)-1-(3'-methoxycarbonyl-2'-thioureido)benzen e and 2-(0,0-dimethylthiophosphorylamino)-1-(3'-methoxycarbonyl-2'-thioureido)be nzene are known to show an excellent fungicidal activity against various plant pathogenic fungi, and they have been widely used as agricultural fungicides since 1970. However, their continuous application over a long period of time provides phytopathogenic fungi with tolerance to them, whereby their plant diseasepreventive effect is much lowered. Further, the fungi which gained tolerance to certain kinds of benzimidazole or thiophanate fungicides also show considerable tolerance to some other kinds of benzimidazole or thiophanate fungicides. Thus, they are apt to obtain cross-tolerance. Therefore, if any material decrease of their plant disease-preventive effect in certain fields is observed, their application to such fields has to be discontinued. But, it is often observed that the density of drug-resistant organisms is not decreased even long after the application thereof has been discontinued. Although other kinds of fungicides have to be employed in such case, only few are so effective as benzimidazole or thiophanate fungicides in controlling various phytopathogenic fungi. Cyclic imide fungicides such as Procymidone (3-(3',5'-dichlorophenyl)-1,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1,2-dicarboximide), Iprodione (3-(3',5'-dichlorophenyl)-1-isopropylcarbamoylimidazolidine-2,4-dione), Vinchlozoline (3-(3',5'-(dichlorophenyl)-5-methyl-5-vinyloxazolidine-2,4-dione), ethyl (RS)-3-(3',5'-dichlorophenyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dioxooxazolidine-5-carboxylate, etc., which are effective against various plant diseases, particularly those caused by Botrytis cinerea, have the same defects as previously explained with respect to the benzimidazole and thiophanate fungicides.

In C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, t. 289, S'erie D, pages 691-693 (1979), it is described that such herbicides as Barban (4-chloro-2-butynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate), Chlorobufam (1-methyl-2-propynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate), Chlorpropham (isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate) and Propham (isopropyl N-phenylcarbamate) exhibit a fungicidal activity against certain organisms tolerant to some of the benzimidazole or thiophanate fungicides. However, their fungicidal activity against the drug-resistant fungi is not strong enough, and hence, practically they can not be used as fungicides.

As a result of a study seeking a new type of fungicides, it has now been found that compounds of the formula: ##STR2## wherein X and Y are, the same or different, each a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower alkynyl group, a cyano group, a hydroxyiminomethyl group, a haloalkyl group or a group of the formula: ##STR3## in which R2 is a lower alkyl group and R3 is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group or a lower alkynyl group, X and Y being simultaneously not hydrogen; R1 is a cyano group or a group of the formula: ##STR4## in which R4 is a cyano group, a lower cyanoalkyl group or a lower alkylthio group, R5 is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkoxy group or a lower alkylamino group and R6 is a lower alkyl group, a lower haloalkyl group or a lower alkylamino group; Z is a hydrogen atom, a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower alkynyl group or a group of the formula: ##STR5## in which R7 is a lower alkyl group, a lower cycloalkyl group, a lower haloalkyl group, a lower alkoxyalkyl group or a phenyl group, R8 is a hydrogen atom or a lower alkyl group, R9 is a lower alkyl group and R10 is a lower alkyl group or a phenyl group; A is an oxygen atom or a sulfur atom; and B is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower cycloalkyl group, a phenyl group or a group of the formula: --W--R11 in which W is an oxygen atom or a sulfur atom and R11 is a lower cycloalkyl group, a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower alkynyl group, a lower haloalkenyl group, a lower haloalkynyl group, a phenyl group, a phenyl group substituted with a halogen atom, a lower cycloalkylalkyl group or a lower alkyl group substituted with a member selected from the group consisting of halogen, cyano, lower alkoxy, phenyl, lower alkenyloxy, lower haloalkoxy, phenoxy and lower aralkyloxy, show an excellent fungicidal activity against plant pathogenic fungi which have developed resistance to benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides. It is notable that their fungicidal potency against the organisms tolerant to benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides (hereinafter referred to as "drug-resistant fungi" or "drug-resistant strains") is much higher than that against the organisms sensitive to benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides (hereinafter referred to as "drug-sensitive fungi" or "drug-sensitive strains").

The term "lower" used hereinabove and hereinafter in connection with organic radicals or compounds indicates that such radicals or compounds each have not more than 6 carbon atoms.

In view of their excellent fungicidal properties, particularly useful are the compound of the formula: ##STR6## wherein X and Y are, the same or different, each a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, a lower alkyl group, a lower alkoxy group or a group of the formula: ##STR7## in which R2 is a lower alkyl group, X and Y being simultaneously not hydrogen; R1 is a group of the formula: ##STR8## in which R3 is a cyano group, a lower cyanoalkyl group or a lower alkylthio group, R4 is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkoxy group or a lower alkylamino group and R5 is a lower alkyl group, a lower haloalkyl group or a lower alkylamino group; and B is a group of the formula: --W--R6 in which W is an oxygen atom or a sulfur atom and R6 is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower alkynyl group, a lower haloalkyl group or a lower alkoxy(lower)alkyl group.

The compounds of the formula (I) are fungicidally effective against a wide scope of plant pathogenic fungi, of which examples are as follows: Podosphaera leucotricha, Venturia inaegualis, Mycosphaerella pomi, Marssonina mali and Sclerotinia mali of apple, Phyllactinia kakicola and Gloeosporium kaki of persimmon, Cladosporium carpophilum and Phomopsis sp. of peach, Cercospora viticola, Uncinula necator, Elsinoe ampelina and Glomerella cingulata of grape, Cercospora beticola of sugarbeet, Cercospora arachidicola and Cercospora personata of peanut, Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei, Cercosporella herpotrichoides and Fusarium nivale of barley, Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici of wheat, Sphaerotheca fuliginea and Cladosporium cucumerinum of cucumber, Cladosporium fulvum of tomato, Corynespora melongenae of eggplant, Sphaerotheca humuli, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae of strawberry, Botrytis alli of onion, Cerospora apii of celery, Phaeoisariopsis griseola of kidney bean, Erysiphe cichoracearum of tobacco, Diplocarpon rosae of rose, Elsinoe fawcetti, Penicillium italicum, Penicillium digitatum of orange, Botrytis cinerea of cucumber, eggplant, tomato, strawberry, pimiento, onion, lettuce, grape, orange, cyclamen, rose or hop, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum of cucumber, eggplant, pimiento, lettuce, celery, kidney bean, soybean, azuki bean, potato or sunflower, Sclerotinia cinerea of peach or cherry, Mycosphaerella melonis of cucumber or melon, etc. Namely, the compounds of the formula (I) are highly effective in controlling the drug-resistant strains of said fungi.

The compounds of the formula (I) are also fungicidally effective against fungi sensitive to said known fungicides as well as fungi to which said known fungicides are ineffective. Examples of such fungi are Pyridularia oryzae, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Plasmopara, viticola, Phytophthora infestans, etc.

Advantageously, the compounds of the formula (I) are of low toxicity and have little detrimental actions on mammals, fishes and so on. Also, they may be applied to the agricultural field without causing any material toxicity to important crop plants.

Thus, the present invention provides a fungicidal compound of the formula (I) and a fungicidal composition which comprises, as an active ingredient, a fungicidally effective amount of the compound of the formula (I) and an inert carrier or diluent. It also provides a combination composition comprising as active ingredients the compound of the formula (I) together with a benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or a cyclic imide fungicide, which is fungicidally effective against not only drug-sensitive fungi but also drug-resistant fungi, and hence particularly effective for the prevention of plant diseases. It also provides a method of controlling plant pathogenic fungi including drug-resistant strains and drug-sensitive strains applying a fungicidally effective amount of the compound of the formula (I) to plant pathogenic fungi, and a process for producing the compound of the formula (I).

The compound of the formula (I) can be prepared by any one of the following procedures:

Procedure (a):

The compound of the formula (I) can be prepared by reacting a compound of the formula: ##STR9## wherein X, Y, R1 and Z are each as defined above, with a compound of the formula: ##STR10## wherein A and B are each as defined above and R12 is a halogen atom, or with a compound of the formula: ##STR11## wherein A is as defined above and B' is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower cycloalkyl group or a phenyl group.

The reaction is usually carried out in the presence of an inert solvent (e.g. benzene, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, chloroform, ethyl acetate, dimethylformamide). If desired, the reaction may be pertormed in the existence of a basic agent (e.g. triethylamine, sodium hydroxide, N,N-diethylaniline) so as to obtain the compound (I) in a high yield. The reaction may be accomplished at a temperature of 0 to 150°C instantaneously or within 12 hours.

Procedure (b):

The compound of the formula (I) can also be prepared by reacting a compound of the formula: ##STR12## wherein X, Y, R1 and A are each as defined above and Z' is a lower alkyl group, a lower alkenyl group, a lower alkynyl group or a group of the formula: ##STR13## in which R8, R9 and R10 are each as defined above, with a compound of the formula:

H--W--R11

wherein W and R11 are each as defined above.

The reaction is usually carried out in the presence of an inert solvent (e.g. benzene, toluene, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate). If desired, the reaction may be performed in the existence of a dehydrohalogenating agent (e.g. pyridine, triethylamine, N,N-diethylaniline, sodium hydroxide) so as to obtain the compound (I) in a high yield. The reaction may be accomplished at a temperature of 0° to 130°C instantaneously or within 12 hours.

Procedure (c):

The compound of the formula (I) can also be prepared by reacting a compound of the formula: ##STR14## wherein X, Y, R1 and A are each as defined above, with a compound of the formula:

H--W--R11

wherein W and R11 are each as defined above.

The reaction is usually carried out in the absence or presence of an inert solvent (e.g. benzene, toluene, xylene, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, dioxane, dimethylformamide, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride). If desired, the reaction may be performed in the existence of a catalyst (e.g. triethylamine, N,N-diethylaniline, 1,4-diazabicyclo(2.2.2)octane) so as to obtain the compound (I) in a high yield. The reaction may be accomplished at a temperature of 0° to 50°C instantaneously or within 10 hours.

The starting compound of the formula: ##STR15## wherein X, Y, R1 and A are each as defined above can be prepared by reacting a compound of the formula: ##STR16## wherein X, Y and R1 are each as defined above with phosgene or thiophosgene.

The reaction is usually carried out in the pressence of an inert solvent (e.g. benzene, toluene, xylene, ethyl acetate). The reaction may be accomplished at a temperature of 50°C to the boiling point of the solvent instantaneously or within 10 hours.

Procedure (d):

The compound of the formula (I) can also be prepared by reacting a compound of the formula: ##STR17## wherein X, Y, R1, A and B are each as defined above, with a compound of the formula:

Z--R13

wherein Z is as defined above and R13 is a leaving group (e.g. tosyloxy, mesyloxy, halogen).

The reaction is usually carried out in the presence of an inert solvent (e.g. benzene, toluene, xylene, dioxane, chloroform). If desired, a basic agent (e.g. triethylamine, sodium hydroxide, sodium hydride) may be present in the reaction. The reaction may be accomplished at a temperature of 0° to 150°C instantaneously or within 12 hours.

Procedure (e):

The compound of the formula (I) wherein Z is a hydrogen atom can be also prepared by reacting a phenol of the formula: ##STR18## wherein X, Y, A and B are each as defined above, with a compound of the formula:

R1 --R14

wherein R1 is as defined above and R14 is a leaving group (e.g. tosyloxy, mesyloxy, halogen).

The reaction is usually carried out in the absence or presence of an inert solvent (e.g. water, benzene, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, dimethylsulfoxide, dimethylformamide), using a dehydrohalogenating agent (e.g. sodium hydroxide, potassium carbonate, sodium hydride) at a temperature of 10° to 100°C for a period of 30 minutes to 12 hours.

The phenol of the formula (II) can be prepared by reacting a 4-aminophenol of the formula: ##STR19## wherein X and Y are each as defined above, with a compound of the formula: ##STR20## wherein A and B are each as defined above.

The phenol of the formula (II) wherein B is a group of the formula: --W--R11 in which W and R11 are each as defined above, can be also prepared by reacting a 4-hydroxyphenyl isocyanate of the formula: ##STR21## wherein X, Y and A are each as defined above, with a compound of the formula:

R11 --W--H (VI)

wherein W and R11 are each as defined above.

The 4-hydroxyphenyl isocyanate of the formula (V) can be prepared by reacting the 4-aminophenol of the formula (III) with phosgene or thiophosgene.

The reaction between the 4-aminophenol of the formula (III) and the compound of the formula (IV) is usually carried out in an inert solvent (e.g. benzene, toluene, xylene, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, dioxane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, ethyl acetate, pyridine, dimethylformamide) in the presence of a dehydrohalogenating agent (e.g. pyridine, triethylamine, N,N-diethylaniline, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide) at a temperature of 0° to 150°C instantaneously or within 10 hours.

The reaction between the 4-aminophenol of the formula (III) and phosgene or thiophosgene can be carried out in an inert solvent (e.g. benzene, toluene, ethyl acetate) at a temperature of 50°C to the boiling point of the solvent within 30 minutes to 10 hours.

The reaction between the 4-hydroxyphenyl isocyanate (V) and the compound of the formula (VI) can be carried out in the absence or presence of an inert solvent (e.g. toluene, xylene, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, dioxane, dimethylformamide, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride). If desired, the reaction may be performed in the presence of a catalyst (e.g. triethylamine, N,N-diethylaniline 1,4-diazabicyclo(2.2.2)octane). The reaction is performed at a temperature of 0° to 50°C instantaneously or within 10 hours.

The aminophenol of the formula (III) can be prepared by reducing a 4-nitrophenol of the formula: ##STR22## wherein X and Y are each as defined above according to an ordinary reduction procedure. In the case of catalytic hydrogenation, for example, the reaction may be carried out in an inert solvent (e.g. ethyl acetate, ethanol) in the presence of a catalyst (e.g. platinum oxide, palladium on carbon) at a temperature of 0° to 60°C under hydrogen gas.

The 4-nitrophenol of the formula (VII) can be prepared, for example, by the method described in the literature [J. Org. Chem., 27, 218 (1962)].

Some typical examples for preparation of the compound of the formula (I) are illustratively shown below.

PAC Preparation of isopropyl N-(3-chloro-4-methylcarbamoyloxy-5-methoxymethylphenyl)carbamate according to Procedure (a)

3-Chloro-4-methylcarbamoyloxy-5-methoxymethylaniline (1.0 g) and N,N-diethylaniline (0.90 g) were dissolved in toluene (15 ml). To the resultant solution was dropwise added isopropyl chloroformate (0.75 g) in 5 minutes under ice-cooling. The resultant mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 12 hours, poured into ice-water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The extract was washed with water, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography using a mixture of benzene and tetrahydrofuran as the eluent to give isopropyl N-(3-chloro- 4-methylcarbamoyloxy-5-methoxymethylphenyl)carbamate (1.22 g) in a yield of 90.5%. M.P., 113°-114°C

Elementary analysis: Calcd. for C14 H19 N2 ClO105 : C, 50.84%; H, 5.79%; N, 8.47%; Cl, 10.72%. Found: C, 50.81%; H, 5.88%; N, 8.35%; Cl, 10.92%.

PAC Preparation of isopropyl N-[3-chloro-4-(3-cyanopropyloxy)-5-methoxymethylphenyl]carbamate according to Procedure (c)

3-Chloro-4-(3-cyaopropyloxy)-5-methoxymethylaniline (2.55 g) in toluene (20 ml) was dropwise added to a toluene solution containing 10 g of phosgene at 10° to 20°C The resulting mixture was gradually heated and, after being refluxed for 30 minutes, cooled to room temperature. The solvent was removed by distillation under reduced pressure to give 3-chloro-4-(3-cyanopropyloxy)-5-methoxymethylphenyl isocyanate (2.80 g). The thus obtained crude substance was added to a toluene solution (50 ml) containing triethylamine (1.0 g) and isopropanol (1.0 g). The resultant mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 12 hours, poured into ice-water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The extract was washed with water, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography using a mixture of toluene and ethyl acetate as the eluent to give isopropyl N-[3-chloro-4-(3-cyanopropyloxy)-5-methoxymethylphenyl]carbamate (2.70 g) in a yield of 79.2%. nD 20.0 1.5196.

NMR δ (CDCl3): 7.42 (d, 1H), 7.12 (d, 1H), 6.77 (broad, 1H), 4.92 (m, 1H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 3.95 (t, 2H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 2.65 (t, 2H), 2.18 (m, 2H), 1.25 (d, 6H).

Preparation of isopropyl N-(3-chloro-4-cyanomethoxy-5-methoxymethylphenyl)carbamate according to Procedure (e)

3-Chloro-4-hydroxy-5-methoxymethylaniline (52.8 g) and N,N-diethylaniline (42.0 g) were dissolved in ethyl acetate (300 ml). To the resultant solution was dropwise added isopropyl chloroformate (34.6 g) in 15 minutes under ice-cooling. After being allowed to stand at room temperature for 12 hours, the reaction mixture was poured into ice-water. The organic layer was washed with dilute aqueous hydrochloric acid and water, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography using tolouene and ethyl acetate as the eluent to give isopropyl N-(3-chloro-4-hydroxy-5-methoxymethylphenyl)carbamate (65.6 g). Sodium hydride (9.60 g, 60% dispersion in mineral oil) was added to dimethylformamide (240 ml). To the resultant mixture was added isopropyl N-(3-chloro-4-hydroxy-5-methoxymethylphenyl)carbamate (65.6 g) under 5°C The resulting solution was stirred for 30 minutes at a temperature of 20°C and, to this solution was added chloroacetonitrile (19.0 g) in 5 minutes. The mixture was heated at 90°C for 10 minutes and poured into ice-water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The extract was washed with aqueous potassium carbonate solution and water, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography using toluene and ethyl acetate as the eluent to give isopropyl N-(3-chloro-4-cyanomethoxy- 5-methoxymethylphenyl)carbamate (67.5 g) in a yield of 76.8%. M.P., 58.5°-60.5°C

Elementary analysis: Calcd. for C14 H17 N2 O4 Cl: C, 53.77%; H, 5.48%; N, 8.96%; Cl, 11.34%. Found: C, 53.77%; H, 5.57%; N, 8.88%; Cl, 11.60%.

PAC Preparation of isopropyl N-(3-methyl-4-methylthiomethyloxy-5-(n)-propylphenyl)carbamate according to Procedure (e)

A mixture of 3-methyl-4-hydroxy-5-(n)-propylaniline (1.65 g) and ethyl acetate (20 ml) was added to an ethyl acetate solution containing 10 g of phosgene at 0 to 5°C The resulting mixture was gradually heated and, after the solution became clear, cooled to room temperature. The solvent was removed by distillation under reduced pressure to give 3-methyl-4-hydroxy-5-(n)-propylphenyl isocyanate. The thus obtained crude substance was added to a toluene solution (50 ml) containing triethylamine (1.0 g) and isopropanol (1.0 g). The resultant mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 12 hours, poured into ice-water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The extract was washed with dilute aqueous hydrochloric acid and water, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography using a mixture of toluene and ethyl acetate as the eluent to give isopropyl N-(3-methyl-4-hydroxy-5-(n)-propylphenyl)carbamate (1.70 g). Sodium hydride (0.28 g, 60% dispersion in mineral oil) was added to dimethylformamide (50 ml). To the resulting mixture was added isopropyl N-(3-methyl-4-hydroxy-5-(n)-propylphenyl)carbamate (1.70 g) under 5°C The resulting solution was stirred for 30 minutes at a temperature of 20°C and, to this solution was added (chloromethyl)methylsulfide (0.67 g) in 5 minutes. The mixture was heated at 90°C for 10 minutes and poured into ice-water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The extract was washed with aqueous potassium carbonate solution and water, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography using a mixture of toluene and ethyl acetate as the eluent to give isopropyl N-(3-methyl-4-methylthiomethyloxy-5-(n)-propylphenyl)carbamate (1.90 g) in a yield of 61.0%. nD21.4 1.5299.

NMR δ (CDCl3): 7.01 (s, 2H), 6.45 (broad, 1H), 4.99 (m, 1H), 4.86 (s, 2H), 2.65 (t, 2H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 1.29 (d, 6H), 0.80-1.50 (m, 5H).

According to either one of the above Procedures (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e), the aniline derivatives of the formula (I) as shown in Table 1 can be prepared:

TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
##STR23##
Com-
pound Physical
No. X Y R1 Z A B constant
__________________________________________________________________________
1 H OC2 H5
##STR24##
H O O(i)Pr M.P. 93-94.degree
. C.
2 Cl CH2 OCH3
##STR25##
H O O(i)Pr n D26.1
1.5142
3 Cl CH2 OCH3
##STR26##
H O O(i)Pr M.P. 90-92.degree
. C.
4 Cl CH2 OCH3
##STR27##
H O O(i)Pr M.P. 113-114.degr
ee. C.
5 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr M.P.
58.5-60.5°
C.
6 Cl CH2 OCH3
(CH2)3 CN
H O O(i)Pr n D20.0
1.5196
7 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 SCH3
H O O(i)Pr n D20.0
1.5471
8 Cl CH2 OCH3
SO2 CH3
H O O(i)Pr n D22.0
1.5266
9 Cl CH2 OCH3
SO2 CF3
H O O(i)Pr M.P.
96-98°
C.
10 Cl CH2 OCH3
SO2 NH(n)Pr
H O O(i)Pr n D22.0
1.5250
11 CH3
CH3 CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr M.P.
114-116°
C.
12 CH3
##STR28## CH3 CN
H O O(i)Pr M.P. 76-78.degree
. C.
13 Cl OC2 H5
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr M.P.
89-91°
C.
14 CH3
CH2 CH2 CH3
CH2 SCH3
H O O(i)Pr n D21.4
1.5299
15 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR29## n D22.0
1.5383
16 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR30## n D19.7
1.5350
17 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR31## n D22.0
1.5191
18 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O OCH2 CH2 F
n D22.0
1.5280
19 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O SC2 H5
n D22.0
1.5752
20 CH3
CH2 CHCH2
CH2 C N
H O O(i)Pr
21 CH3
##STR32## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
22 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H S O(i)Pr
23 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H S S(i)Pr
24 Cl CH2 OCH3
CN H O O(i)Pr
25 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
26 Br CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
27 Cl
##STR33## CH2 C N
H O O(i)Pr
28 Cl
##STR34## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
29 Cl
##STR35## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
30 Cl NCHCH3 CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
31 OC2 H5
CCH CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
32 OC2 H5
CN CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
33 CH3
##STR36## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
34 CH3
##STR37## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
35 CH(OCH3)2
OC2 H5
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
36 CH(OC2 H5)2
OC2 H5
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
37 CH3
##STR38## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
38 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
CH3 O O(i)Pr
39 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
CH2 CHCH2
O O(i)Pr
40 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
CH2 CCH
O O(i)Pr
41 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR39##
O O(i)Pr
42 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR40##
O O(i)Pr
43 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR41##
O O(i)Pr
44 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR42##
O O(i)Pr
45 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR43##
O O(i)Pr
46 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR44##
O O(i)Pr
47 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
SCH3
O O(i)Pr
48 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
SC6 H5
O O(i)Pr
49 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR45##
O O(i)Pr
50 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR46##
O O(i)Pr
51 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
OH O O(i)Pr
52 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
OCH3
O O(i)Pr
53 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR47##
O O(i)Pr
54 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
##STR48##
O O(i)Pr
55 CH3
##STR49## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
56 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR50##
57 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR51##
58 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O CHCHCH3
59 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O C6 H5
60 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR52##
61 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR53##
62 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR54##
63 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR55##
64 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O OCH2 CH2 CN
65 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR56##
66 CH3
##STR57## CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
67 CH3
##STR58## CH2 C N
H O O(i)Pr
68 CH3
CHNOH CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
69 CH3
CHNOCH3
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
70 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR59##
71 CH3
OC2 H5
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
72 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR60##
73 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 C N
H O
##STR61##
74 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR62##
75 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR63##
76 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR64##
77 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR65##
78 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR66##
79 OC2 H5
CHBrCH2 Br
CH2 CN
H O O(i)Pr
80 Cl CH2 OCH3
CH2 CN
H O
##STR67##
__________________________________________________________________________

In the practical usage of the compounds of the formula (I) as fungicides, they may be applied as such or in a preparation form such as dusts, wettable powders, oil sprays, emulsifiable concentrates, tablets, granules, fine granules, aerosols or flowables. Such preparation form can be prepared in a conventional manner by mixing at least one of the compounds of the formula (I) with an appropriate solid or liquid carrier(s) or diluent(s) and, if necessary, an appropriate adjuvant(s) (e.g. surfactants, adherents, dispersants, stabilizers) for improving the dispersibility and other properties of the active ingredient.

Examples of the solid carriers or diluents are botanical materials (e.g. flour, tobacco stalk powder, soybean powder, walnut-shell powder, vegetable powder, saw dust, bran, bark powder, cellulose powder, vegetable extract residue), fibrous materials (e.g. paper, corrugated cardboard, old rags), synthetic plastic powders, clays (e.g. kaolin, bentonite, fuller's earth), talcs, other inorganic materials (e.g. pyrophyllite, sericite, pumice, sulfur powder, active carbon) and chemical fertilizers (e.g. ammonium sulfate, ammonium phosphate, ammonium nitrate, urea, ammonium chloride).

Examples of the liquid carriers or diluents are water, alcohols (e.g. methanol, ethanol), ketones (e.g. acetone, methylethylketone), ethers (e.g. diethyl ether, dioxane, cellosolve, tetrahydrofuran), aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. benzene, toluene, xylene, methyl naphthalene), aliphatic hydrocarbons (e.g. gasoline, kerosene, lamp oil), esters, nitriles, acid amides (e.g. dimethylformamide, dimethylacetamide), halogenated hydrocarbons (e.g. dichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride), etc.

Examples of the surfactants are alkyl sulfuric esters, alkyl sulfonates, alkylaryl sulfonates, polyethylene glycol ethers, polyhydric alcohol esters, etc. Examples of the adherents and dispersants may include, casein, gelatin, starch powder, carboxymethyl cellulose, gum arabic, alginic acid, lignin, bentonite, molasses, polyvinyl alcohol, pine oil and agar. As the stabilizers, there may be used PAP (isopropyl acid phosphate mixture), tricresyl phosphate (TCP), tolu oil, epoxydized oil, various surfactants, various fatty acids and their esters, etc.

The foregoing preparations generally contain at least one of the compounds of the formula (I) in a concentration of about 1 to 95 % by weight, preferably of 2.0 to 80 % by weight. By using the preparations, the compounds of the formula (I) are generally applied in such amounts as 2 to 100 g per 10 are.

When only the drug-resistant strains of phytopathogenic fungi are present, the compounds of the formula (I) may be used alone. However, when the drug-sensitive strains are present together with the drug-resistant strains, their alternate use with benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides or their combined use with benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides is favorable. In such alternate or combined use, each active ingredient may be employed as such or in conventional agricultural preparation forms. In case of the combined use, the weight proportion of the compound of the formula (I) and the benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicide may be from about 1 : 0.1 to 1 : 10∅

Typical examples of the benzimidazole, thiophanate and cyclic imide fungicides are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2
__________________________________________________________________________
Compound
Structure Name
__________________________________________________________________________
##STR68## Methyl 1-(butyl- carbamoyl)benz- imidazol-2-yl
- carbamate
B
##STR69## 2-(4-Thiazolyl)benz- imidazole
C
##STR70## Methyl benzimidazol- 2-ylcarbamate
D
##STR71## 2-(2-Furyl)benz- imidazole
E
##STR72## 1,2-Bis(3-methoxy- carbonyl-2-thio- ureido)ben
zene
F
##STR73## 1,2-Bis(3-ethoxy- carbonyl-2-thio- ureido)benz
ene
G
##STR74## 2-(O,SDimethyl- phosphorylamino)-1- (3'-methox
ycarbonyl- 2'-thioureido)benzene
H
##STR75## 2-(O,ODimethylthio- phosphorylamino)-1-
(3'-methoxycarbonyl- 2'-thioureido)benzene
I
##STR76## N(3',5'-Dichloro- phenyl)-1,2-dimethyl-
cyclopropane-1,2-di- carboximide
J
##STR77## 3-(3' ,5'-Dichloro- phenyl)-1-isopropyl-
carbamoylimida- zolidin-2,4-dione
K
##STR78## 3-(3',5'-Dichloro- phenyl)-5-methyl-5-
vinyloxazolidin-2,4- dione
L
##STR79## Ethyl (RS)3-(3',5'- dichlorophenyl)-5-
methyl-2,4-dioxo- oxazolidine-5- carboxylate
__________________________________________________________________________

Besides, the compounds of the formula (I) may be also used in admixture with other fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, miticides, fertilizers, etc.

When the compounds of the formula (I) are used as fungicides, they may be applied in such amounts as 2 to 100 grams per 10 ares. However, this amount may vary depending upon preparation forms, application times, application methods, application sites, diseases, crops and so on, and therefore, they are not limited to said particular amounts.

Some practical embodiments of the fungicidal composition according to the invention are illustratively shown in the following Examples wherein % and part(s) are by weight.

Preparation Example 1

Two parts of Compound No. 5, 88 parts of clay and 10 parts of talc were thoroughly pulverized and mixed together to obtain a dust preparation containing 2 % of the active ingredient.

Thirty parts of Compound No. 12, 45 parts of diatomaceous earth, 20 parts of white carbon, 3 parts of sodium laurylsulfate as a wetting agent and 2 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate as a dispersing agent were mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder preparation containing 30 % of the active ingredient.

Fifty parts of Compound No. 13, 45 parts of diatomaceous earth, 2.5 parts of calcium alkylbenzenesulfonate as a wetting agent and 2.5 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate as a dispersing agent were mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder preparation containing 50 % of the active ingredient.

Ten parts of Compound No. 17, 80 parts of cyclohexanone and 10 parts of polyoxyethylene alkylaryl ether as an emulsifier were mixed together to obtain an emulsifiable concentrate preparation containing 10 % of the active ingredient.

One part of Compound No. 5, 1 part of Compound No. I, 88 parts of clay and 10 parts of talc were thoroughly pulverized and mixed together to obtain a dust preparation containing 2 % of the active ingredient.

Twenty parts of Compound No. 3, 10 parts of Compound J, 45 parts of diatomaceous earth, 20 parts of white carbon, 3 parts of sodium laurylsulfate as a wetting agent and 2 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate as a dispersing agent were mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder preparation containing 30 % of the active ingredient.

Ten parts of Compound No. 13, 40 parts of Compound A, 45 parts of diatomaceous earth, 2.5 parts of calcium alkylbenzenesulfonate as a wetting agent and 2.5 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate as a dispersing agent were mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder preparation containing 50 % of the active ingredient.

Typical test data indicating the excellent fungicidal activity of the compounds of the formula (I) are shown below. The compounds used for comparison are as follows:

______________________________________
Compound Remarks
______________________________________
##STR80## Commercially available herbicide
##STR81## Commercially available herbicide
##STR82## Commercially available herbicide
##STR83## Commercially available herbicide
##STR84## Commercially available herbicide
##STR85## Commercially available herbicide
##STR86## Commercially available fungicide
##STR87## Commercially available fungicide
##STR88## Commercially available fungicide
______________________________________

Protective activity test on powdery mildew of cucumber (Sphaerotheca fuliqinea):

A flower pot of 90 ml volume was filled with sandy soil, and seeds of cucumber (var: Sagami-hanjiro) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 8 days. Onto the resulting seedlings having cotyledons, the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water was sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. Then, the seedlings were inoculated with a spore suspension of the drug-resistant or drug-sensitive strain of Sphaerotheca fuliginea by spraying and further cultivated in the greenhouse. Ten days thereafter, the infectious state of the plants was observed. The degree of damage was determined in the following manner, and the results are shown in Table 3.

The leaves examined were measured for a percentage of infected area and classified into the corresponding disease indices, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4:

______________________________________
Disease index Percentage of infected area
______________________________________
0 No infection
0.5 Infected area of less than 5%
1 Infected area of less than 20%
2 Infected area of less than 50%
4 Infected area of not less than 50%
______________________________________

The disease severity was calculated according to the following equation: ##EQU1##

The prevention value was calculated according to the following equation: ##EQU2##

TABLE 3
______________________________________
Prevention
Prevention
value when
value when
Concentration inoculated
inoculated
of active with drug-
with drug-
Compound ingredient resistant sensitive
No. (ppm) strain (%)
strain (%)
______________________________________
2 500 100 0
3 500 100 0
4 500 100 0
5 200 100 0
12 200 100 0
13 200 100 0
Swep 200 0 0
Chlorpropham
200 0 0
Barban 200 25 0
CEPC 200 0 0
Propham 200 0 0
Chlorbufam
200 0 0
Benomyl 200 0 100
Thiophanate-
200 0 100
methyl
Carbendazim
200 0 100
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 3, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention show an excellent preventive effect on the drug-resistant strain but do not show any preventive effect on the tested drug-sensitive strain. To the contrary, commercially available known fungicides such as Benomyl, Thiophanate-methyl and Carbendazim show a notable controlling effect on the drug-sensitive strain but not on the drug-resistant strain. Other tested compounds structurally similar to the compounds of the formula (I) do not show any fungicidal activity on the drug-sensitive strain and the drug-resistant strain.

Preventive effect on cercospora leaf spot of sugarbeet (Cercospora beticola):

A flower pot of 90 ml volume was filled with sandy soil, and seeds of sugarbeet (var: Detroit dark red) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 20 days. Onto the resulting seedlings, the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water was sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. Then, the seedlings were inoculated with a spore suspension of the drug-resistant or drug-sensitive strain of Cercospora beticola by spraying. The pot was covered with a polyvinyl chloride sheet to make a condition of high humidity, and cultivation was continued in the greenhouse for 10 days. The degree of damage was determined in the same manner as in Experiment 1, and the results are shown in Table 4.

TABLE 4
______________________________________
Prevention
Prevention
value when
value when
Concentration inoculated
inoculated
of active with drug-
with drug-
Compound ingredient resistant sensitive
No. (ppm) strain (%)
strain (%)
______________________________________
2 500 100 0
3 500 100 0
4 500 100 0
5 200 100 0
12 200 100 0
13 200 100 0
15 200 100 0
17 200 100 0
18 200 100 0
Swep 200 0 0
Chlorpropham
200 0 0
Barban 200 34 0
CEPC 200 0 0
Propham 200 0 0
Chlorbufam
200 0 0
Benomyl 200 0 100
Thiophanate-
200 0 100
methyl
Carbendazim
200 0 100
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 4, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention show an excellent preventive effect on the drug-resistant strain but do not show any preventive effect on the tested drug-sensitive strain. To the contrary, commercially available known fungicides such as Benomyl, Thiophanate-methyl and Carbendazim show a notable controlling effect on the drug-sensitive strain but not on the drug-resistant strain. Other tested compounds structurally similar to the compounds of the formula (I) do not show any fungicidal activity on the drug-sensitive strain and the drug-resistant strain.

Preventive effect on scab of pear (Venturia nashicola): A plastic pot of 90 ml volume was filled with sandy soil, and seeds of pear (var: Chojuro) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 20 days. Onto the resulting seedlings, the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water was sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. Then, the seedlings were inoculated with a spore suspension of the drug-resistant or drug-sensitive strain of Venturia nashicola by spraying. The resulting plants were placed at 20°C under a condition of high humidity for 3 days and then at 20°C under irradiation with a fluorescent lamp for 20 days. The degree of damage was determined in the same manner as in Experiment 1, and the results are shown in Table 5.

TABLE 5
______________________________________
Prevention
Prevention
value when
value when
Concentration inoculated
inoculated
of active with drug-
with drug-
Compound ingredient resistant sensitive
No. (ppm) strain (%)
strain (%)
______________________________________
2 500 100 0
3 500 100 0
4 500 100 0
5 200 100 0
12 200 100 0
13 200 100 0
15 200 100 0
18 200 100 0
Benomyl 200 0 100
Thiophanate-
200 0 100
methyl
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 5, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention show an excellent preventive effect on the drug-resistant strain but do not show any preventive effect on the tested drug-sensitive strain. To the contrary, commercially available fungicides such as Benomyl and Thiophanate-methyl show a notable controlling effect on the drug-sensitive strain but not on the drug-resistant strain.

Preventive effect on brown leaf-spot of peanut (Cercospora arachidicola):

Plastic pots of 90 ml volume were filled with sandy soil, and seeds of peanut (var: Chiba hunryusei) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 14 days. Onto the resulting seedlings, the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water was sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. Then, the seedlings were inoculated with a spore suspension of the drug-resistant or drug-sensitive strain of Cercospora arachidicola by spraying. The resulting plants were covered with a polyvinyl chloride sheet to make a condition of humidity and cultivated in the greenhouse for 10 days. The degree of damage was determined in the same manner as in Experiment 1, and the results are shown in Table 6.

TABLE 6
______________________________________
Prevention
Prevention
value when
value when
Concentration inoculated
inoculated
of active with drug-
with drug-
Compound ingredient resistant sensitive
No. (ppm) strain (%)
strain (%)
______________________________________
5 200 100 0
12 200 100 0
13 200 100 0
15 200 100 0
19 200 98 0
Benomyl 200 0 100
Thiophanate-
200 0 100
methyl
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 6, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention show an excellent preventive effect on the drug-resistant strain but do not show any preventive effect on the tested drug-sensitive strain. To the contrary, commercially available known fungicides such as Benomyl and Thiophanate-methyl show a notable controlling effect on the drug-sensitive strain but not on the drug-resistant strain.

Preventive effect on gray mold of cucumber (Botrytis cinerea):

Plastic pots of 90 ml volume were filled with sandy soil, and seeds of cucumber (var: Sagami-hanjiro) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 8 days to obtain cucumber seedlings expanding cotyledons. Onto the resulting seedlings, the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water was sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. After air-drying, the seedlings were inoculated with mycelial disks (5 mm in diameter) of the drug-resistant or drug-sensitive strain of Botrytis cinerea by putting them on the leaf surfaces. After the plants were infected by incubating under high humidity at 20°C for 3 days, the rates of disease severity were observed. The degree of damage was determined in the same manner as in Experiment 1, and the results are shown in Table 7.

TABLE 7
______________________________________
Prevention
Prevention
value when
value when
Concentration inoculated
inoculated
of active with drug-
with drug-
Compound ingredient resistant sensitive
No. (ppm) strain (%)
strain (%)
______________________________________
1 200 100 0
2 200 100 0
3 200 100 0
4 200 100 0
5 200 100 0
6 500 100 0
7 500 100 0
8 500 100 0
9 500 100 0
10 500 100 0
11 500 100 0
12 200 100 0
13 200 100 0
14 500 100 0
15 200 100 0
16 200 100 0
17 200 100 0
18 200 100 0
19 200 100 0
Benomyl 200 0 100
Thiophanate-
200 0 100
methyl
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 7, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention show an excellent preventive effect on the drug-resistant strain but do not show any preventive effect on the tested drug-sensitive strain. To the contrary, commercially available known fungicides such as Benomyl and Thiophanate-methyl show a notable controlling effect on the drug-sensitive strain but not on the drug-resistant strain.

Preventive effect on gummy stem blight of cucumber (Mycosphaerella melonis):

Plastic pots of 90 ml volume were filled with sandy soil, and seeds of cucumber (var: Sagami-hanjiro) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 8 days to obtain cucumber seedlings expanding cotyledons. Onto the resulting seedlings, the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water was sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. After air-drying, the seedlings were inoculated with mycelial disks (5 mm in diameter) of the drug-resistant or drug-sensitive strain of Mycosphaerella melonis by putting them on the leaf surfaces. After the plants were infected by incubating under high humidity at 25°C for 4 days, the rates of disease severity were observed. The degree of damage was determined in the same manner as in Experiment 1, and the results are shown in Table 8.

TABLE 8
______________________________________
Prevention
Prevention
value when
value when
Concentration inoculated
inoculated
of active with drug-
with drug-
Compound ingredient resistant sensitive
No. (ppm) strain (%)
strain (%)
______________________________________
5 200 100 0
12 200 100 0
13 200 100 0
17 200 100 0
Benomyl 200 0 100
Thiophanate-
200 0 100
methyl
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 8, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention show an excellent preventive effect on the drug-resistant strain but do not show any preventive effect on the tested drug-sensitive strain. To the contrary, commercially available known fungicides such as Benomyl and Thiophanate-methyl show a notable controlling effect on the drug-sensitive strain but not on the drug-resistant strain.

Preventive effect on green mold of orange (Penicillium italicum):

Fruits of orange (var: Unshu) were washed with water and dried in the air. The fruits were immersed in a solution of the test compound prepared by diluting an emulsifiable concentrate comprising the test compound with water for 1 minute. After drying in the air, the fruits were inoculated with a spore suspension of the drug-resistant or drug-sensitive strain of Penicillium italicum by spraying and placed in a room of high humidity for 14 days. The degree of damage was determined in the following manner:

The fruits examined were measured for a percentage of infected area and classified into the corresponding indices, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5:

______________________________________
Disease index Percentage of infected area
______________________________________
0 No infection
1 Infected area of less than 20%
2 Infected area of less than 40%
3 Infected area of less than 60%
4 Infected area of less than 80%
5 Infected area of not less than 80%
______________________________________

Calculation of the degree of damage and the prevention value was made as in Experiment 1.

The results are shown in Table 9.

TABLE 9
______________________________________
Prevention
Prevention
value when
value when
Concentration inoculated
inoculated
of active with drug-
with drug-
Compound ingredient resistant sensitive
No. (ppm) strain (%)
strain (%)
______________________________________
5 200 100 0
12 200 100 0
13 200 100 0
15 200 100 0
18 200 100 0
Benomyl 200 0 100
Thiophanate-
200 0 100
methyl
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 9, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention show an excellent preventive effect on the drug-resistant strain but do not show any preventive effect on the tested drug-sensitive strain. To the contrary, commercially available known fungicides such as Benomyl and Thiophanate-methyl show a notable controlling effect on the drug-sensitive strain but not on the drug-resistant strain.

Phytotoxicity on crop plants:

Plastic pots of 150 ml volume were filled with sandy soil, and seeds of wheat (var: Norin No. 61), apple (var: Kogyoku) and peanut (var: Chiba banryusei) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse. Onto the resulting seedlings, the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water was sprayed. After cultivation in the greenhouse for an additional 10 days, the phytotoxicity was examined on the following criteria:

______________________________________
Extent Observation
______________________________________
- No abnormality
+ Abnormality due to phytotoxicity observed
in a part of crop plants
++ Abnormality due to phytotoxicity observed
in entire crop plants
+++ Crop plants withered due to phytotoxicity
______________________________________

The results are shown in Table 10.

TABLE 10
______________________________________
Concentration
of active
Compound ingredient Phytotoxicity
No. (ppm) Wheat Apple Peanut
______________________________________
5 1000 - - -
12 1000 - - -
13 1000 - - -
Barban 1000 - ++ ++
CEPC 1000 - ++ ++
Swep 1000 ++ ++ +
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 10, the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention produce no material phytotoxicity, while commercially available herbicides having a chemical structure similar thereto produce considerable phytotoxicity.

Preventive effect on powdery mildew of cucumber (Sphaerotheca fuliginea):

A plastic pot of 90 ml volume was filled with sandy soil, and seeds of cucumber (var: Sagami-hanjiro) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 8 days. Onto the resulting seedlings having cotyledons, the test compound(s) formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water were sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. Then, the seedlings were inoculated with a mixed spore suspension of the drug-resistant and drug-sensitive strain of Sphaerotheca fuliginea by spraying and further cultivated in the greenhouse. Ten days thereafter, the infectious state of the plants was observed. The degree of damage was determined in the same manner as in Experiment 1, and the results are shown in Table 11.

TABLE 11
______________________________________
Concentration of
Prevention
active ingredient
value
Compound No. (ppm) (%)
______________________________________
2 100 40
2 20 0
3 100 42
3 20 0
4 100 34
4 20 0
5 100 45
5 20 0
12 100 38
12 20 0
13 100 36
13 20 0
17 100 40
17 20 0
18 100 36
18 20 0
A 100 45
A 20 12
B 500 42
B 100 10
C 100 42
C 20 8
D 500 36
D 100 0
E 100 44
E 20 10
F 100 43
F 20 8
G 100 42
G 20 8
H 100 40
H 20 5
2 + A 20 + 20 100
2 + B 20 + 20 100
2 + E 20 + 20 100
2 + G 20 + 20 100
3 + C 20 + 20 100
3 + D 20 + 20 100
3 + F 20 + 20 100
3 + H 20 + 20 100
4 + A 20 + 20 100
4 + D 20 + 20 100
4 + E 20 + 20 100
4 + G 20 + 20 100
5 + A 20 + 20 100
5 + B 20 + 20 100
5 + E 20 + 20 100
5 + G 20 + 20 100
12 + C 20 + 20 100
12 + D 20 + 20 100
12 + F 20 + 20 100
12 + H 20 + 20 100
13 + A 20 + 20 100
13 + D 20 + 20 100
13 + E 20 + 20 100
13 + G 20 + 20 100
17 + A 20 + 20 100
17 + B 20 + 20 100
17 + E 20 + 20 100
17 + G 20 + 20 100
18 + C 20 + 20 100
18 + D 20 + 20 100
18 + F 20 + 20 100
18 + H 20 + 20 100
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 11, the combined use of the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention with benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides show much more excellent preventive effect than their sole use.

Preventive effect on gray mold of tomato (Botrytis cinerea):

A plastic pot of 90 ml volume was filled with sandy soil, and seeds of tomato (var: Fukuji No. 2) were sowed therein. Cultivation was carried out in a greenhouse for 4 weeks. Onto the resulting seedlings at the 4-leaf stage, the test compound(s) formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder and diluted with water were sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per pot. Then, the seedlings were inoculated with a mixed spore suspension of the drug-resistant and drug-sensitive strain of Botrytis cinerea by spraying and placed at 20°C in a room of high humidity for 5 days. The degree of damage was determined in the same manner as in Experiment 1, and the results are shown in Table 12.

TABLE 12
______________________________________
Concentration of
Prevention
active ingredient
value
Compound No. (ppm) (%)
______________________________________
2 100 32
2 20 0
3 100 44
3 20 0
4 100 44
4 20 0
5 100 38
5 20 0
12 100 40
12 20 0
13 100 42
13 20 0
15 100 43
15 20 0
I 100 48
I 20 22
J 500 46
J 100 18
K 100 42
K 20 15
L 500 42
L 100 12
2 + I 20 + 50 100
2 + J 20 + 50 100
3 + I 20 + 50 100
3 + K 20 + 50 100
4 + I 20 + 50 100
4 + J 20 + 50 100
4 + K 20 + 50 100
4 + L 20 + 50 100
5 + I 20 + 50 100
5 + J 20 + 50 100
12 + I 20 + 50 100
12 + K 20 + 50 100
13 + I 20 + 50 100
13 + J 20 + 50 100
13 + K 20 + 50 100
13 + L 20 + 50 100
15 + I 20 + 50 100
15 + J 20 + 50 100
______________________________________

As understood from the results shown in Table 12, the combined use of the compounds of the formula (I) of the invention with benzimidazole, thiophanate and/or cyclic imide fungicides show much more excellent preventive effect than their sole use.

Kamoshita, Katsuzo, Noguchi, Hiroshi, Takahashi, Junya, Yamamoto, Shigeo, Kato, Toshiro, Ishiguri, Yukio

Patent Priority Assignee Title
6194443, Oct 15 1996 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Aminophenol derivatives with fungicidal property
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3557183,
4482546, Apr 16 1981 Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited Fungicidal N-phenylcarbamates
EP51871,
///////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 11 1983TAKAHASHI, JUNYASumitomo Chemical Company, LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0041200199 pdf
Apr 11 1983KATO, TOSHIROSumitomo Chemical Company, LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0041200199 pdf
Apr 11 1983NOGUCHI, HIROSHISumitomo Chemical Company, LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0041200199 pdf
Apr 11 1983ISHIGURI, YUKIOSumitomo Chemical Company, LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0041200199 pdf
Apr 11 1983YAMAMOTO, SHIGEOSumitomo Chemical Company, LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0041200199 pdf
Apr 11 1983KAMOSHITA, KATSUZOSumitomo Chemical Company, LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0041200199 pdf
Apr 15 1983Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 30 1988ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Aug 24 1990M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247.
Aug 15 1994M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 22 1998REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Feb 28 1999EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Mar 03 19904 years fee payment window open
Sep 03 19906 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 03 1991patent expiry (for year 4)
Mar 03 19932 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Mar 03 19948 years fee payment window open
Sep 03 19946 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 03 1995patent expiry (for year 8)
Mar 03 19972 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Mar 03 199812 years fee payment window open
Sep 03 19986 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 03 1999patent expiry (for year 12)
Mar 03 20012 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)