aircraft composite components having foam cores comprising at least two foam sheets joined with a sheet of honeycomb to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich. The layers of sheet foam are in contact with each other and the honeycomb cells extend a substantially equal depth into and generally perpendicular to the sheet foam layers. The composite component has increased shear strength. The aircraft composite component can be made by aligning a layer of honeycomb between and generally perpendicular to two layers of sheet foam. A compressive force is applied generally perpendicular to at least one layer of sheet foam so that the honeycomb cells penetrate each of the two layers of sheet foam to a substantially equal depth so that the layers of foam contact each other to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich. The foam core is surrounded by resin impregnated fibers and cured.
|
9. aircraft composite comopnents, comprising a composite skin surrounding foam core wherein the improvement comprises:
a. said foam core comprising alternating layers of at least two layers of sheet foam and at least one layer of honeycomb having cells; b. said honeycomb layer having a greater compressive strength than said layers of sheet foam; c. said layers of sheet foam in contact with each other at least through each of the honeycomb openings; and d. said layer of honeycomb cells extending into and generally perpendicular to each of said two layers of sheet foam but not penetrating entirely through said sheet foam layer to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich;
wherein the composite component has increased shear strength. 1. aircraft composite components, comprising a composite skin surrounding a foam core wherein the improvement comprises:
a. said foam core comprising alternating layers of at least two layers of sheet foam and at least one layer of honeycomb having cells; b. said honeycomb layer having a greater compressive strength than said layers of sheet foam; c. said layers of sheet foam having substantially equal compressive strength; d. said layers of sheet foam in contact with each other at least through each of the honeycomb openings; and e. said layer of honeycomb cells extending a substantially equal depth into and generally perpendicular to each of said two layers of sheet foam but not penetrating entirely through said sheet foam layers to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich;
wherein the composite component has increased shear strength. 3. A method of making an aircraft composite component comprising joining at least two foam sheets to make a foam core, surrounding the foam core with resin impregnated fibers, and curing said resin impregnated fibers wherein the improvement comprises joining said foam sheets by
a. aligning a layer of honeycomb having cells so that said cells are between and generally perpendicular to two layers of sheet foam, and said honeycomb cells having a compressive strength greater than that of the sheet foam; and b. applying a compressive force generally perpendicular to at least one layer of sheet foam so that the honeycomb cells pentrate each of the two layers of sheet foam to a substantially equal depth where said layers of foam contact each other at least through each of the honeycomb openings to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich said honeycomb not penetrating entirely through said foam sheets; resulting in a composite component that has increased shear strength in comparison to adhesively bonded foam sheets.
5. A method of making an aircraft composite component comprising joining at least two foam sheets to make a foam core, surrounding the foam core with resin impregnated fibers, and curing said resin impregnated fibers wherein the improvement comprises joining said foam sheets by
a. aligning a layer of honeycomb having cells so that the cells are generally perpendicular to a first layer of sheet foam; b. applying a compressive force generally perpendicular to said layer of sheet foam so that the honeycomb cells penetrate said layer of sheet foam; c. aligning a second layer of sheet foam, having a compressive strength substantially less than said first layer, generally perpendicular so said layer of honeycomb against said honeycomb layer's exposed side; and d. applying a compressive strength generally perpendicular to at least one layer of sheet foam so that the honeycomb cells penetrate said layers of sheet foam to a depth where said layers of foam contact each other at least through each of the honeycomb openings to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich said honeycomb not in contact with said resin impregnated fibers;
resulting in a composite component that has increased shear strength. 2. The aircraft composite components as recited in
4. The method of making an aircraft composite component as recited in
6. The aircraft composite component of
7. The method of making an aircraft composite component of
8. The method of making an aircraft composite component of
10. The aircraft composite component as recited in
|
The field of art to which this invention pertains is aircraft composite components particularly those having foam cores and methods for making the same.
Composites are increasingly used in aerospace technology as a replacement for metals. In airplanes and helicopters, composites are an improvement over metals as they are lightweight, strong, durable and can be manufactured economically. Many aircraft composite components are comprised of a foam core surrounded with a composite skin as this provides a lightweight rigid structure.
The foam core can be comprised of a plurality of thin foam sheets joined together instead of a single piece of foam. Thick pieces of many types of foam can be expensive because it can take long periods of time for the foam to rise during its production. Consequently, the foam core is made of layers of foam sheets joined together. Usually these foam sheets are joined using conventional adhesives, however, this can result in composite parts having low strengths.
Accordingly, there has been a constant search in the field of aircraft composite parts for components having improved strengths.
This disclosure is directed to aircraft composite components that have foam cores with improved shear strength. Aircraft composite components comprise a composite skin surrounding a foam core. The foam core comprises alternating layers of at least two layers of sheet foam and at least one layer of honeycomb. The honeycomb layer has a greater compressive strength than the sheet foam layers. The layers of sheet foam have substantially equal compressive strengths and are in contact with each other. The layer of honeycomb cells extend a substantially equal depth into and generally perpendicular to each of said two layers of sheet foam to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich.
Another aspect of this invention is a method of making an aircraft composite component that has increased shear strength. At least two foam sheets are joined to make a core, which is then surrounded by resin impregnated fibers and cured. The improvement comprises joining the foam sheets by aligning a layer of honeycomb so that its cells are between and generally perpendicular to two layers of sheet foam. A compressive force is applied generally perpendicular to at least one layer of sheet foam so that the honeycomb cells penetrate each of the two layers of sheet foam to a substantially equal depth so that the layers of foam contact each other to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich. The honeycomb cells have a compressive strength great than that of the sheet foam.
Yet another aspect of this invention is another method of making an aircraft composite component that has increased shear strength. At least two foam sheets are joined to make a foam core, the foam core is surrouned with resin impregnated fibers and the resin is cured. The improvement comprises joining the foam sheets by aligning a layer of honeycomb so that the cells are generally perpendicular to a first layer of sheet foam. A compressive force is applied generally perpendicular to the layer of sheet foam so that the honeycomb cells penetrate the layer of sheet foam. A second layer of sheet foam that has a compressive strength substantially less than the first layer of sheet foam is aligned generally perpendicular to and against the honeycomb layer's exposed side. A compressive strength is applied generally perpendicular to at least one layer of sheet foam so that the honeycomb cells penetrate said layers of sheet foam to a depth where the foam layers contact each other to form a foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich.
These aircraft composite components have foam cores with increased shear strength resulting in an increase in overall component strength. Thus, they make a significant advance in the aerospace field of art.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages will be apparent from the specification, claims and from the accompanying drawings which will illustrate an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a side view cutaway of an airplane wing trailing edge fairing showing the spliced foam sheets of this invention.
FIG. 2 is a perspecitve view cutaway of an airplane wing trailing edge fairing showing the honeycomb spliced foam.
The foam sheets of this invention are lightweight, rigid, closed-cell foams having a thickness of about 0.4 inch to about 4 inches because this brackets the range of thicknesses that provide high strength, environmentally stable, lightweight, close tolerance, aircraft quality foams manufactured by the rise method. The foam has a density of about 0.5 pounds per cubic foot (lb/ft3) to about 20 lb/ft3. Below about 0.5 lb/ft3, the foam tends to be crushed as the honeycomb is forced through the foam and above about 20 lb/ft3, the foam crushes the honeycomb so that the honeycomb does not penetrate the foam sheet. It is preferred that the density is about 2 lb/ft3 to about 4 lb/ft3 because at these densities the foams can be more weight efficient and provide smoother surfaces than honeycomb core sandwich structures. The foam should have a compression strength of about 20 pounds per square inch (psi) to about 200 psi because below about 20 psi, the force required to imbed (penetrate) the honeycomb in the foam for the lightest available honeycombs would exceed the compressive strength of the honeycomb and cause it to collapse and above about 200 psi, the size of the honeycomb cells would become too small to penetrate the foam without crushing the foam. It is preferred that the compression strength is about 50 psi to about 100 psi. The foams used in this invention have a shear strength of about 80 psi to about 160 psi because of the preceding considerations and a fixed relationship between shear strength and compression strength. It is preferred that the foams used in this invention are resistant to atmospheric conditions such as moisture, humidity and temperature extremes to which aircraft components are exposed in worldwide operations. There are a variety of foams which fill the above qualifications including polyimides (annealed or heat treated), polyurethanes, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and cellular cellulose acetate (CCA). An exemplary foam is Rohacel™ polyimide available from Rohm Corporation of Germany which is distributed in the United States by Cyro Corporation, Orange, Connecticut. Another exemplary foam is Strux CCA™ foam available from Deltex Associates, Bridgewater, New Jersey.
The honeycomb material of this invention is an open cell material whose compression strength is greater than that of the foam described above. By greater is meant at least about 50% greater, otherwise the honeycomb will not be able to penetrate the foam. Typically, the honeycomb has hexagonal cells although honeycomb having other than hexagonal shaped cells would work in the practice of this invention. The cell diameter or nodal size of the honeycomb is about 0.125 inch to about 0.375 inch because below about 0.125 inch, the cells are too small to penetrate the foam without crushing it, and above about 0.375 inch, the strength of the honeycomb becomes so low that it would crush before penetrating the foam. It is preferred that the nodal size is about 0.188 inch to about 0.313 inch for ease of penetration and compatibility of compression strengths in typical applications. The thickness of the honeycomb cell walls is about 0.001 inch to about 0.003 inch because above about 0.003 inch, the honeycomb density becomes excessive for the application, and below about 0.001 inch, the cell walls lack the stability to provide adequate compressive strength. The thickness of the honeycomb sheet is about 0.0625 inch to about 1 inch because below about 0.0625 inch, there is insufficient penetration to achieve an adequate shear strength for splice purposes, and above about 1 inch, there is no longer any increase in strength. Preferably, the honeycomb sheet is about 0.25 inch to about 0.5 inch in thickness because below about 0.25 inch, tolerances could reduce penetration below minimum levels needed to achieve adequate shear strengths, and above about 0.5 inch, no useful purpose is served and excess weight will accrue. The honeycomb is typically comprised of a variety of materials such as aluminum, fiberglass, polymers, composites, paper, and phenolics. An exemplary material is Nomex™ fiberglass available from E. I. DuPont de Nemours Company (Wilmington, Del. ). Other exemplary materials are standard aluminum honeycomb cores procurable to military specifications.
The adhesives used in the preferred embodiments of this invention are conventional adhesives such as epoxies, polyesters and nitrile phenolics. Preferably, these are used as a paste or film. The adhesive, foam and honeycomb materials should be selected so that they are compatible. For example, it is preferred to use thermosetting room temperature curing epoxy adhesives, and annealed polyimide foams, with Nomex™ honeycomb because of their high strength to weight ratios, environmental durability and ease of manufacture. It is also preferred to use film epoxy adhesive, heat treated polyimide foam and aluminum honeycomb because of its higher strength.
The fibers that form the composite skins (or facings) that surround the foam core are conventional fibers such as graphite, Kevlar™ polyamide fiber (E. I. DuPont De Nemours, Wilmington, Del.) and fiberglass. The resins used in the composite skins surrounding the foam core are conventional composite resins such as epoxies and polyesters. The resin and fibers are selected such that the combination is compatible and forms a conventional composite such as are used in the aircraft art.
A clearer understanding of this invention may be had by reference to FIG. 1 which illustrates a side view cutaway of an airplane wing trailing edge fairing 1 showing the splice foam sheets of this invention. A foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich 2 comprises sheets of foam 5 and 7 in contact while a sheet of honeycomb 6 is between and penetrates each sheet. Preferably the layer of honeycomb penetrates the foam to a depth of about 0.2 inch to about 1 inch. Below about 0.2 inch, the component strength is not substantially increased and above 1 inch, there is little increase in strength. Successive layers can be built up to fill the component interior 9. Finally, a composite skin 11 (layup or winding) surrounds the component. FIG. 2 is a perspective view cutaway of an airplane wing trailing edge fairing showing the honeycomb spliced foam. The foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich 2 comprises sheets of foam 5 and 7 in contact with a honeycomb sheet 6 between and penetrating foam sheets 5 and 7.
The aircraft composite components of this invention are made by aligning a sheet of the honeycomb between two sheets of the foam so that the honeycomb cells are perpendicular to the foam sheets. A force is then applied to the foam sheets compressing them against the honeycomb so that the honeycomb penetrates the foam until both sheets of foam are in contact. Because the foam sheets have been selected so that they have substantially equal compressive strengths, the honeycomb penetrates both sheets of foam to a similar depth. By substantially equal compressive strengths is meant strengths within about 10% of each other. It is preferred that prior to joining the two plates of foam to form the foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich, adhesive is spread on at least one side of the foam resulting in a redundant foam splice. Thus, the two sheets of foam are not only mechanically interlocked but also adhesively interlocked. Successive sheets of foam can be joined using this invention to form the foam core thicknesses acquired of the below-described aircraft composite components.
Alternatively, the honeycomb sheet is compressed into first one foam sheet and then the above described foam-honeycomb-foam sandwich is made by compressing the still exposed side of the honeycomb into the second foam sheet. In this aspect, the first foam sheet has a compressive strength substantially greater than the second foam sheet. The differential compressive strengths assure an approximately equal penetration of both foam sheets by the honeycomb cells as first one foam sheet is penetrated and then both foam sheets are penetrated. Thus, the compressive strengths should be such that in combination with the depth of the first penetration into the foam sheet the foam sheets are penetrated an approximately equal distance by the honeycomb. Thus, for example, the greater the difference in compressive strengths, the deeper the first penetration into the foam sheet should be. This method can be used to join foam sheets of different compressive strengths and is advantageous because honeycomb penetration into the lower strength foam would not be possible using simultaneous pressure. Also, penetration depth control is enhanced and becomes inspectable.
The foam-honeycomb-foam stack can be machined to the desired shape. The foam core is then covered or surrounded by a composite skin through the use of conventional resin impregnated fiber layup or wrap methods. The composite skin facings can be applied to the core sandwich by winding or lay-up of fibers which may optionally be preimpregnated with resin, followed by curing.
A sheet of foam was coated with a layer of paste adhesive. The foam sheet was stacked sequentially with a honeycomb core sheet and another layer of foam. The two sheets of foam were pressed together until they made contact. The adhesive was allowed to cure for about 8 hours at room temperature. The joined stack of foam was machined to the desired shape and composite skin facings were applied to the machined core stack. The core and facing assemblage was placed in a mold having the same shape as the finished part. The mold was fabricated with a top and bottom segment to fit around the component. About 50 psi was applied to the mold at a temperature of about 350° F. for about 2 hours to cure the composite facings to the core. The mold was opened and the cured part removed.
These foam cores have improved shear strength over multilayer foam cores that are joined together with adhesives. The following table details shear strengths for samples of a wing trailing edge fairing with adhesively bonded foam cores containing bond voids in comparison to multilayer foam cores spliced with honeycomb. Composite parts having adhesively joined sheets that upon examination have no voids surpass the design requirement for an exemplary wing trailing edge fairing. Howver, composite parts can have shear strengths significantly lower than the design requirement as a result of bond voids between foam sheets. The honeycomb spliced sheets of this invention provide consistent shear strengths that exceed the design requirement.
TABLE |
______________________________________ |
Shear Strength of a Wing Trailing Edge Fairing (lb/inch) |
Adhesively Adhesively |
Design |
Joined Sheets Joined Sheets |
Honeycomb |
Reqmt. |
(No Voids) (With Voids) |
Spliced Sheets |
______________________________________ |
60 178 20 111 |
______________________________________ |
These aircraft composite components include secondary structures such as doors (equipment compartment, landing gear, weapon engine compartment, furnishings, maintenance, etc.); control surfaces (ailerons, flaps, elevators, trim tabs, rudders, etc.); helicopter rotor blades (main and tail); fairings (aerodynamic wing leading and trailing edge, empennage, main rotor pylon, fuselage, pods, etc.); winglets; fins; strakes; interior panels; skin panels and equipment supports.
These aircraft composite components have foam cores with increased shear strength resulting in an increase in overall component strength. They facilitate the use of built-up foam cores which provide thick, high strength, lightweight, smooth composite components. In addition, the positive interlock can eliminate the necessity for the testing of the foam-to-foam joint. It has been discovered that testing was required for adhesively bonded foam sheet cores because of the presence of adhesive voids between the foam sheets. However, suitable detection methods for low weight foams are not readily available. Thus, this positive interlock system eliminates the specific problem of adhesive void detection and the more general joint weakness problem in that it provides a positive guaranteed interlocked foam core and consistent strengths. Thus, this helicopter composite components make a significant advance in the field of composite components.
It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiment shown and described herein, but that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of this concept as defined by the following claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10011346, | Dec 18 2015 | Amazon Technologies, Inc | Propeller blade indentations for improved aerodynamic performance and sound control |
10099773, | Dec 18 2015 | Amazon Technologies, Inc | Propeller blade leading edge serrations for improved sound control |
10259562, | Dec 18 2015 | Amazon Technologies, Inc | Propeller blade trailing edge fringes for improved sound control |
10259574, | Dec 18 2015 | Amazon Technologies, Inc | Propeller surface area treatments for sound dampening |
10399307, | Jun 04 2014 | BRIGHT LITE STRUCTURES LLC | Reinforced composite structure |
10399665, | Dec 18 2015 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Propeller blade indentations for improved aerodynamic performance and sound control |
10406789, | Jun 04 2014 | BRIGHT LITE STRUCTURES LLC | Multicomponent polymer resin, methods for applying the same, and composite laminate structure including the same |
10443198, | Jul 02 2008 | RoadVision Technologies, Inc. | Depressible pavement device |
10460717, | Dec 18 2015 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Carbon nanotube transducers on propeller blades for sound control |
10495094, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Modular fan housing with multiple modular units having sound attenuation for a fan array for an air-handling system |
10633084, | Aug 25 2017 | BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC | Geodesic composite structures |
10641271, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
10780677, | Jun 04 2014 | BRIGHT LITE STRUCTURES LLC | Composite structure exhibiting energy absorption and/or including a defect free surface |
10786977, | Jun 04 2014 | BRIGHT LITE STRUCTURES LLC | Composite sandwich having a high bending stiffness |
10933988, | Dec 18 2015 | Amazon Technologies, Inc | Propeller blade treatments for sound control |
10967583, | Apr 03 2015 | BRIGHT LITE STRUCTURES LLC | Apparatus for controllably cutting fibers and related methods |
11097507, | Nov 05 2010 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Foam stiffened structure and method of making the same |
11163302, | Sep 06 2018 | Amazon Technologies, Inc.; Amazon Technologies, Inc | Aerial vehicle propellers having variable force-torque ratios |
11180237, | Sep 07 2017 | THE NORDAM GROUP LLC | Acoustic abatement panel fabrication |
11241867, | Jun 04 2014 | BRIGHT LITE STRUCTURES LLC | Multicomponent polymer resin, methods for applying the same, and composite laminate structure including the same |
11255332, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Modular fan housing with multiple modular units having sound attenuation for a fan array for an air-handling system |
11459085, | Apr 30 2019 | BELL TEXTRON RHODE ISLAND INC ; Textron Innovations Inc | Energy attenuation stabilizers and methods |
11505310, | Dec 21 2017 | Airbus Operations GmbH | Flow body for a vehicle with a compressible skin |
11623428, | Jul 30 2021 | United States Government as Represented by the Secretary of the Army | Load-bearing composite platform |
11679860, | Sep 07 2017 | THE NORDAM GROUP LLC | Acoustic abatement panel fabrication |
11834177, | Apr 30 2019 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Energy attenuation stabilizers and methods |
11845699, | Sep 07 2021 | BLUE ORIGIN, LLC | Methods for manufacturing coated composite materials |
11891172, | Jun 21 2018 | Sierra Nevada Corporation | Devices and methods to attach a composite core to a surrounding structure |
4797312, | Sep 30 1987 | DUCOMMUN AEROSTRUCTURES, INC | Foam-honeycomb article and method |
4857380, | Sep 30 1987 | DUCOMMUN AEROSTRUCTURES, INC | Foam-honeycomb article and method |
4954387, | Jun 04 1987 | MTU Motoren-und Turbinen-Union Munchen GmbH | Composite material of metal and plastic |
4955982, | Mar 26 1987 | ROADVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Raised depressible pavement marker |
4964936, | Oct 11 1988 | Albermarle Corporation | Method of making foam-filled cellular structures |
5106668, | Jun 07 1989 | Hexcel Corporation | Multi-layer honeycomb structure |
5188879, | Jul 15 1991 | Sorrento Engineering Corporation | Polyimide foam filled structures |
5194311, | Apr 09 1985 | Deutsche Airbus GmbH | Cushioning core and seat construction especially for an aircraft seat |
5514017, | Jul 20 1994 | Recreational board for water sports | |
5553814, | Dec 30 1992 | The B.F. Goodrich Company | Skin for a deicer |
5580502, | Mar 23 1995 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Method of fabricating a composite article having an integral, co-cured composite stiffening member |
5609314, | Jun 02 1994 | The B. F. Goodrich Company | Skin for a deicer |
6403195, | Mar 10 2000 | DURAKON INDUSTRIES, INC | Composite panel structure and method of making same |
6649096, | Jul 30 2001 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method of making a filled honeycomb core composite structure |
6673415, | Nov 26 1999 | Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.; Asahi Fiber Glass Company, Limited | Honeycomb core material for sandwich structure and method for manufacturing the same |
6770349, | Jul 30 1999 | Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Sandwich structure and method of repairing the same |
7010897, | May 27 1999 | Lightweight construction element in the form of a hollow body contoured honeycomb structure | |
7163253, | Dec 30 2003 | Durakon Industries, Inc. | Method of manufacturing composite vehicle panels |
7284726, | Feb 17 2004 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Self extinguishing composite primary structure |
7316444, | Dec 30 2003 | Durakon Industries, Inc. | Method of manufacturing composite vehicle panels |
7462311, | Jul 10 2000 | Webasto Vehicle Systems International GmbH | Process for producing a compound motor vehicle component |
7597534, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
7727587, | Dec 19 2007 | Method of manufacturing honeycomb and foam composite material | |
7914252, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
7922442, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
8056850, | Jan 18 2008 | The Boeing Company | Particle-filled wing-to-body fairing and method for reducing fairing vibrations |
8087877, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
8292214, | Jan 18 2008 | The Boeing Company | Vibration damping for wing-to-body aircraft fairing |
8360355, | Aug 04 2010 | The Boeing Company | Wing-to-body fairing with spray-on foam and noise reduction method |
8367183, | Jun 08 2005 | Kabushiki Kaisha Shizuka | Sandwich panel including honeycomb structure body and method of producing the sandwich panel |
8389104, | Oct 02 2009 | METYX USA INC | Composite cores and panels |
8398365, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Modular fan units with sound attenuation layers for an air handling system |
8414251, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Modular fan housing with multiple modular units having sound attenuation for a fan array for an air-handling system |
8419348, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
8419883, | Mar 27 2004 | METYX USA INC | Fiber reinforced composite cores and panels |
8470425, | Oct 01 2009 | METYX USA INC | Composite cores and panels |
8556574, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
8562283, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
8663791, | Apr 04 2011 | METYX USA INC | Composite reinforced cores and panels |
8694175, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
8727700, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Fan array fan section in air-handling systems |
8727701, | Mar 19 2004 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Modular fan housing with multiple modular units having sound attenuation for a fan array for an air-handling system |
8734086, | Mar 20 2003 | Nortek Air Solutions, LLC | Modular fan housing with multiple modular units having sound attenuation for a fan array for an air-handling system |
8752783, | Aug 04 2010 | The Boeing Company | Wing-to-body faring with spray-on foam and noise reduction method |
8926786, | Dec 13 2007 | The Boeing Company | Composite panel and method of manufacturing the same |
9015941, | Oct 30 2012 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.; BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC | Method of repairing honeycomb core using pourable structural foam |
9079674, | Sep 18 2009 | BLUE ORIGIN, LLC | Composite structures for aerospace vehicles, and associated systems and methods |
9149999, | Oct 30 2012 | BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC | Method of repairing, splicing, joining, machining, and stabilizing honeycomb core using pourable structural foam and a structure incorporating the same |
9186863, | Oct 01 2009 | METYX USA INC | Composite cores and panels |
9333684, | Oct 30 2012 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.; BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC | Method of repairing, splicing, joining, machining, and stabilizing honeycomb core using pourable structural foam and a structure incorporating the same |
9469418, | Sep 18 2009 | BLUE ORIGIN, LLC | Composite structures for aerospace vehicles, and associated systems and methods |
9534351, | Jul 02 2008 | RoadVision Technologies, Inc. | Method of installing depressible pavement marker |
9597826, | Oct 30 2012 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.; BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC | Method of repairing, splicing, joining, machining, and stabilizing honeycomb core using pourable structural foam and a structure incorporating the same |
9669579, | Nov 13 2008 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft skin attachment system |
9731472, | Oct 01 2009 | METYX USA INC | Composite cores and panels |
9868233, | Nov 05 2010 | Textron Innovations Inc | Moldable fly-away tool structure system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3249659, | |||
3578526, | |||
3650863, | |||
3998219, | Dec 05 1975 | Hexcel Corporation | Orthopedic splint and method for forming same |
4042746, | Nov 07 1975 | W R GRACE & CO | Composite material and method of forming |
4132042, | Jan 13 1978 | THERMA-TRU HOLDINGS, INC | Door structure and method for forming such structure |
4351870, | Oct 22 1979 | Maximized strength-to-weight ratio panel material | |
4409054, | Jan 14 1981 | United Technologies Corporation | Method for applying abradable material to a honeycomb structure and the product thereof |
4594120, | Jul 27 1981 | VOUGHT AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC | Method for installing a septum in honeycomb core |
4598008, | Dec 16 1983 | Ford Motor Company | Sandwich component for the bodywork of a motor vehicle |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 23 1986 | KAY, BRUCE F | United Technologies Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004550 | /0625 | |
Apr 28 1986 | United Technologies Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 31 1990 | M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247. |
Dec 20 1990 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jan 10 1995 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 08 1995 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 08 1995 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Mar 09 1999 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 15 1999 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 18 1990 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 18 1991 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 18 1991 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 18 1993 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 18 1994 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 18 1995 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 18 1995 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 18 1997 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 18 1998 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 18 1999 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 18 1999 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 18 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |