The invention relates to a method for controlling stem break in cereal plants, wherein the fungus pseudocercosporella anguioides or pseudocercosporella aestiva is applied to the cereal plants their seed or their area of cultivation.
|
9. A composition for controlling stem break in cereal plants comprising a carrier and an amount of P. anguioides or P. aestiva effective to suppress stem break in cereal plants.
1. A method for controling stem break in cereal plants wherein the fungus pseudocercosporella anguioides or pseudocercosporella aestiva is applied to the cereal plants, their seed or their areas of cultivation.
2. A method as claimed in
3. A method as claimed in
4. A method as claimed in
5. A method as claimed in
6. A method as claimed in
7. A method as claimed in
8. A method as claimed in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
A particular problem in cereal cultivation is so-called stem break, which is caused by certain fungi of the genus Pseudocercosporella. When these fungal diseases occur, destruction of the nutrient-conveying vessels in the cereal stem is observed. In an extreme case, this can lead to rotting of the stem base. This generally results in early lodging of the cereal. Substantial losses of yield may be the consequence in this case.
The frequent use of chemical agents for controling stem break can lead to resistance problems. Fungal strains of the genus Pseudocercosporella may develop which are insensitive to the use of such fungicides.
Surprisingly, it has been found that the fungal species Pseudocercosporella anguioides and P. aestiva can advantageously be used for controling the stem break pathogen P. herpotrichoides.
P. anguioides and P. aestiva are known, naturally occurring species of fungi. They have been deposited under number CBS No. 496.80 (P. anguioides) and CBS No. 497.80 (P. aestiva) in the Centralbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS), Ooosterstraat, Baarn, The Neatherlands. However, both fungal species can be used, regardless of their origin, i.e. the variants and mutants and all naturally occurring strains can be employed according to the invention. The natural strains are isolated by methods known to the skilled worker, see e.g. H. Bockmann, Nachrichtenblatt Deutscher Pflanzenschutzdienst 14, 153-156 (1962).
The present invention therefore relates to a method for controling stem break in cereal plants, wherein the fungal species Pseudocercosporella anguioides or Pseudocercosporella aestiva is applied to the cereal plants their seed or their areas of cultivation. P. anguioides is preferably employed.
P. anguioides and P. aestiva are not pathogens of the cereal stem, in contrast of Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides var. herpotrichoides and Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides var. acuformis, which cause stem break.
In contrast to these pathogenic species, P. anguioides only populates the leaf sheaths and not the cereal stem, whereas P. aestiva occurs on the leaf sheaths and on dead plant tissue of cereals.
When P. anguioides or P. aestiva are applied in particular in the early vegetation phase of cereal plants, inoculation of the stems by the pathogenic Pseudocercosporella species can surprisingly be greatly restricted or even completely surpressed. In the case of spray application, preferred fields of use are in development stage EC 10 to EC 25 (one-leaf stage to middle of the tillering period). Dressing or soil application is also possible.
P. anguioides or P. aestiva can be used in particular in the cereal species wheat, barley and rye, preferably in winter wheat, winter barley or winter rye.
The fungal species to be used according to the invention can be obtained as an inoculum from one-spore cultures and multiplied as described by H. Bockmann, Nachrichtenblatt Deutscher Planzenschutzdienst 14 (1962), pages 153-156. They can also be grown by cultivation on suitable substrates, such as cereal grains, straw or other plant materials, or with the aid of conventional solid nutrient media, such as potato dextrose agar (PDA), melt or yeast extract agar, water agar, SNA agar (Joffe medium), etc., if appropriate on suitable carrier materials, such as mica schist (®Vermicullit) or plastics, or on appropriate liquid nutrient media without the addition of agar.
The present invention also relates to crop protection agents which contain P. anguioides or P. aestiva as mycelia and/or spores in addition to suitable diluents, such as water and/or auxiliaries. The auxiliaries employed can be conventional additives, such as adhesives or emulsifiers.
The fungi can be used as mycelia or in the form of spores (conidia).
The agents according to the invention can be used as wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates, sprayable solutions, dusting agents, dressings, dispersions, granules or microgranules, in the usual formulations.
To use them, the concentrates in the commercial form are, if appropriate, diluted in a conventional manner, for example with water in the case of wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates, dispersions and water-dispersible (micro) granules. Dust-like and granulated formulations and dressings are not usually diluted with further inert substances before being used. Mixtures or mixed formulations with fungicidal active ingredients or non-fungicidal active ingredients such as insecticides, acaricides, herbicides, fertilizers or growth regulators, are also possible, and a synergistic increase in the activity may also be achieved in some cases.
P. anguioides and P. aestiva can also be used for controling the stem break pathogen Rhizoctonia spp. in the stated cereal species.
The application rate for the fungi to be used according to the invention can vary between 5.0×104 and 6.0×1015 colony-forming units per ha, in particular between 1.0×109 and 1.0×1013 colony-forming units per ha. Colony-forming units are understood as being either mycelium fragments, mycelium conglomerates or spores. The application rate of spray liquor per ha can vary between 50 and 600 l/ha. The examples below serve to illustrate the invention.
A. Preparation of the inoculum:
(a) The inoculum was obtained from single-spore cultures and multiplied in the manner described by BOCKMANN (1962). For this purpose, 2 ml of conidia suspension were incubated in 18 ml of a 0.8% strength malt solution with the addition of streptomycin (0.05%) for 8-10 days at 18°C in small conical flasks. Thereafter, inoculation with the freshly obtained mycelium suspension was carried out in 300 ml conical flasks which had already been filled with sterilized, moist, swollen wheat grains. After about 10 days, when the grains were covered with the fungus, they were spread out in thin layers in pricking-out dishes, slightly moistened, and placed out in the open at the beginning of the cool season. After about three weeks, when large amounts of conidia have been observed, the grains were laid out to dry at room temperature. For field inoculation, the wheat grains were washed thoroughly with water for a short time. The spore concentration was adjusted to 300,000 conidia/ml of water.
(b) As described in (a), the inoculum of P. anguioides was obtained, and multiplied as described by BOCKMANN. Thereafter SNA agar was inoculated with spores or mycelia of P. anguioides, a mixture of P. anguioides materials from three different sources being used. The inoculated agar was incubated for three weeks at 15°C and in black light (UV). The agar was then shaken up with an Ultra-Turrax stirrer and the spore suspension obtained was adjusted to 3×105 spores/ml.
B. Field trials
Rye, barley and wheat were sown in fall. Inoculation with P. anguioides which had been obtained by method (a) was carried out after about 7 weeks, between the beginning of tillering and the principle tillering stage (development stage 21-25) at a rate of application of water of 400 l/ha (concentration: 3×108 conidia/l). When milk ripeness was attained (development stage 75) the damage to the cereal plants as a result of stem break was rated.
The result is shown in the table below.
| TABLE 1 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Dose % damage by stem break |
| Application |
| Spores/ha Barley Rye Wheat |
| ______________________________________ |
| Not inoculated 68 43 35 |
| Control (C) |
| inoculated with |
| 1.2 × 1011 |
| 12 9 12 |
| P. anguioides |
| ______________________________________ |
Barley was sown in fall. Inoculation was effected 29 days later, the P. anguioides preparation obtained by method (Ab) being used. The dosages are shown in Table 2. The results below were obtained in two independent trials. Rating was carried out when milk ripeness had been attained (according to BOCKMANN's scheme).
| TABLE 2 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Dose % damage |
| Application Spores/ha Barley |
| ______________________________________ |
| Trial 1 1.2 × 1011 |
| 8 |
| Trial 2 1.2 × 1011 |
| 11 |
| Control: |
| Trial 1 -- 42 |
| Trial 2 -- 64 |
| ______________________________________ |
As shown by the resulting values in the tables above, damage to the cereal plants is substantially reduced when P. anguioides is employed.
Prillwitz, Hans-Georg, Schreiber, Maria-Teresa
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 5730973, | Feb 15 1994 | Hoechst Schering AgrEvo GmbH | Water-dispersible granules of spores or live Beauveria bassiana |
| 5833977, | Jul 14 1994 | Oy Lahden Polttimo AB | Method of improving the quality of plant seeds using lactic acid producing micro-organisms |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4595589, | Mar 30 1982 | Kemira Oy | Fungistatic method |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Jan 07 1988 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Sep 17 1991 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Feb 16 1992 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Feb 16 1991 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 16 1991 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 16 1992 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Feb 16 1994 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Feb 16 1995 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 16 1995 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 16 1996 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Feb 16 1998 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Feb 16 1999 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 16 1999 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 16 2000 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Feb 16 2002 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |