In a CO2 miscible displacement enhanced oil recovery process, produced CO2 -hydrocarbon gas containing from more than the maximum CO2 content tolerable in a fuel gas up to about 70 volume percent CO2 is reinjected into a small portion of the well pattern volume and produced CO2 -hydrocarbon gas containing more than 70 volume percent CO2 is reinjected into a larger portion of the well pattern volume. The method provides a more effective utilization of CO2 in a CO2 miscible enhanced oil recovery process while maintaining most of the oil-containing formation under miscible conditions.

Patent
   4744417
Priority
May 21 1987
Filed
May 21 1987
Issued
May 17 1988
Expiry
May 21 2007
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
8
5
EXPIRED
1. In a method for the recovery of viscous oil from a subterranean viscous, oil-containing formation penetrated by a plurality of injection wells and a plurality of spaced-apart production wells forming a well pattern comprising:
(a) injecting carbon dioxide into the formation via said plurality of injection wells at the miscible displacement pressure to miscibily displace oil through the formation to said plurality of production wells and recovering fluids including oil and gas containing hydrocarbons from the formation via said plurality of production wells;
(b) separating said gas containing hydrocarbons from said oil and analyzing said gas to determine the concentration of carbon dioxide;
(c) recovering said produced gas containing the maximum CO2 content tolerable in a fuel gas;
(d) continuing steps (a), (b) and (c) until the produced gas contains from more than the maximum CO2 content tolerable in a fuel gas up to about 70 volume percent CO2 and reinjecting said gas into a small portion of the well pattern volume via a predetermined number of injection wells;
(e) continuing steps (a), (b), (c) and (d) until the produced gas contains more than 70 volume percent CO2 and reinjecting said gas into a larger portion of the well pattern volume via a predetermined number of injection wells; and
(f) continuing steps (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) until the amount of oil recovered from the formation is unfavorable.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said plurality of production wells and said plurality of injection wells are arranged in a 5-spot regular geometric pattern.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the CO2 injected into the formation during step (a) is at pressures above the MMP.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein during step (d) the produced gs containing from more than the maximum CO2 content tolerable in a fuel gas up to 70 volume percent CO2 is reinjected into 30% or less pore volume of said well pattern.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein during step (e) the produced gas containing more than 70 volume percent CO2 is reinjected into more than 30% pore volume of said well pattern.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the produced gas reinjected into the well pattern volume during steps (d) and (e) is at pressures at or above the MMP.

This invention relates to a process for recovering oil from a subterranean, viscous oil containing formation. More particularly, this invention relates to a method for effectively handling produced CO2 -hydrocarbon gas mixtures in a miscible CO2 displacement process for oil recovery.

In the recovery of oil from oil-containing formations, it usually is possible to recover only minor portions of the original oil in place by the so-called primary recovery methods which utilize only the natural forces present in the formation. Thus, a variety of supplemental recovery techniques have been employed in order to increase the recovery of oil from subterranean formations. These techniques include thermal recovery methods, waterflooding and miscible flooding.

More recently, carbon dioxide has been used successfully as a miscible oil recovery agent. Carbon dioxide is a particularly desirable material because it is highly soluble in oil and dissolution of carbon dioxide in oil causes a reduction in the viscosity of the oil and increases the volume of oil all of which improve the recovery efficiency of the process. Carbon dioxide is sometimes employed under non-miscible conditions and in certain reservoirs it is possible to achieve a condition of miscibility at reservoir temperature and pressure between essentially pure carbon dioxide and the reservoir oil.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,875,832 and 3,995,693 disclose the use of CO2 -hydrocarbon gas mixtures in the recovery of oil from subterranean oil-containing formations wherein produced gas from the formation containing CO2 and hydrocarbons in recycled to the formation.

The present invention provides a method for recovering oil from subterranean, viscous oil-containing formations wherein carbon dioxide is injected into the formation at pressures at or above the miscible displacement pressure to miscibly displace the oil and hydrocarbon gas to a recovery well. The improvement comprises reinjecting produced CO2 -hydrocarbon gas into the formation in a manner that more effectively utilizes the CO2 while maintaining most of the formation under miscible conditions thereby lowering the cost of oil recovery.

The present invention relates to a method for the recovery of viscous oil from a subterranean, viscous oil-containing formation penetrated by a plurality of injection wells and a plurality of spaced apart production wells forming a well pattern comprising injecting carbon dioxide into the formation via said plurality of injection wells at or above the miscible displacment pressure to miscibly displace oil to the plurality of production wells and recovering fluids including oil and gas containing hydrocarbons from the formation via the plurality of production wells. The gas containing hydrocarbons is separated from the oil and analyzed to determine the concentration of carbon dioxide and the produced gas containing the maximum CO2 content tolerable is recovered as a fuel gas. Miscible CO2 displacement is continued and when the produced gas containing the maximum CO2 content tolerable is recovered as a fuel gas. Miscible CO2 displacement is continued and when the produced gas contains from more than the maximum CO2 content tolerable in a fuel gas up to about 70 volume percent CO2, the produced gas is reinjected into a small portion of the well pattern volume, preferably 30% or less pore volume, via a predetermined number of injection wells, and preferably at or above the MMP. Miscible CO2 displacement is continued and when the produced gas contains more than 70 volume percent CO2, the produced gas in reinjected into a larger portion of the well pattern volume, preferably more than 30% pore volume, via a predetermined number of injection wells and preferably at or above the MMP. The process is continued until the amount of oil recovered is unfavorable. In a preferred embodiment of the process, the plurality of production wells and plurality of injection wells are arranged in a five-spot regular geometric pattern.

FIG. 1 is a plain view of a five-spot well pattern showing a miscible fluid drive pattern particularly adapted for the present invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates the amount of CO2 and hydrocarbons in the gas produced from the formation per day as a function of the time CO2 is injected into the formation.

The process of my invention is best applied to a subterranean, viscous oil-containing formation utilizing a plurality of injection wells and a plurality of production wells extending from the surface of the earth into the subterranean formation. The injection and production wells may be located and spaced from one another in any desired pattern or orientation. For example, the line drive pattern may be utilized in which a plurality of injection wells and a plurality of production wells are arranged in rows which are spaced from one another. Exemplary of other patterns which may be used as those wherein a plurality of production wells are spaced about a central injection well or, conversely, a plurality of injection wells spaced about a central producing well. Typical of such well arrays are the five-spot, seven-spot, nine-spot and 13-spot patterns. The above and other well patterns for affecting secondary recovery operations are well known to those skilled in the art and are illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 3,927,716 to Burdyn et al, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Preferably, the injection wells and production wells are operated in a plurality of five-spot patterns as illustrated in FIG. 1.

Referring to FIG. 1, carbon dioxide is injected into the injection wells in rows (2), (4) and (6) at or above the predetermined minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for that formation as described below. Due to its solubility in oil, when the carbon dioxide contacts the formation oil a portion of it goes into solution with the formation oil resulting in a viscosity reduction and welling of the oil thereby facilitating its displacement from the formation by the subsequent fluid drive. In addition to the viscosity reduction, there is a preferential extraction from the oil by the carbon dioxide of light intermediate hydrocarbons containing from 2 to 5 carbon atoms thereby developing an intermediate-rich carbon dioxide bank in the vicinity of the line of contact between the formation oil and the carbon dioxide. Depending upon the composition of the formation fluids and under proper conditions of formation pressure and temperature, the intermediate rich carbon dioxide bank may be completely miscible with the formation oil thereby forming a miscible transition zone with the formation oil. Depending upon the formation temperature, there is a minimum pressure at which conditional miscibility exists between the carbon dioxide and formation oil which is known as the CO2 minimum miscibility pressure (MMP). Conditional miscibility is to be distinguished from instant miscibility by the fact that miscibility in a conditional miscibility sense is achieved by a series of transition multi-phase conditions described above wherein the carbon dioxide vaporizes intermediate components from the oil until it become miscible thus creating the miscible transition zone in the formation. This minimum miscibility pressure can be determined by means of slim tube displacement tests which means conditions are established simulating those of an enriched gas drive, see paper by Yellig et al entitled "Determination and Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure", Journal of Petroleum Technology, January 1980, pages 160-168, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Briefly, CO2 MMP is determined by the slim tube test wherein percent oil recovery of the in place fluid is determined at solvent breakthrough at given pressure conditions. By varying the pressure at constant composition and temperature, a breakpoint is determined in a curve of percent recovery versus pressure. This breakpoint is indicative of the inception of conditional miscible-type behavior.

The CO2 miscible fluid drive is continued thereby displacing ahead of its mobilized oil toward the production wells in rows (1), (3), (5) and (7) from which fluids including oil and gas containing hydrocarbons are recovered via the production wells. The fluids recovered from the production wells are passed into a separator so as to remove the oil from the produced gas. A small portion of the produced gas is withdrawn and analyzed to determine the concentration of CO2. FIG. 2 discloses the amount of CO2 and hydrocarbons in the produced gas as a function of the time CO2 is injected into the formation. As shown in FIG. 2, the initial gas produced during phase 1 consists essentially of hydrocarbon gases (C1, C2, C3 . . . ). During phase 1, the produced gas containing hydrocarbons is collected as a salable hydrocarbon gas product containing the maximum CO2 content tolerable in a fuel gas. As CO2 miscible displacement continues, the amount of CO2 in the produced gas from the production wells increases as shown during phase 2 and 3 until the gas is predominantly carbon dioxide. During phase 2, when the produced gas contains from more than the maximum CO2 content tolerable in a fuel gas up to about 70 volume percent CO2, the gas is compressed and reinjected into a small portion of the well pattern volume, preferably about 30% or less pore volume of the well pattern, via a predetermined number of injection wells and preferably at or above the predetermined MMP. As shown by FIG. 1, this CO2 -hydrocarbon gas mixture is reinjected into only one of the five-spot patterns of the formation via the injection well designated W10. Although injection of this CO2 -hydrocarbon gas mixture will adversely affect the MMP, its effect will be minimized since it is confined to a small portion of the formation while CO2 is being injected into the remaining portion of formation. The process is continued and when the produced gas contains more than 70 volume percent CO2 during phase 3, the produced gas is injected into a larger number of the well pattern volume, preferably more than 30% pore volume of the well pattern via a predetermined number of injection wells and preferably at or above the predetermined MMP. Since the concentration of hydrocarbons in the gas mixture produced during phase 3 is lower, any adverse effect on the MMP is minimized. During injection of the produced gas containing CO2 into the formation, CO2 is injected into the other well patterns of the formation. The process is continued until the amount of oil recovered from the formation is unfavorable.

The benefit of this process is that the produced gas containing CO2 and hydrocarbons is more effectively utilized while maintaining most of the formation under miscible conditions, thereby reducing the amount of pure CO2 required for oil recovery and also making it unnecessary to install expensive processing equipment to separate the hydrocarbon gas from the CO2.

By the term "pore volume" as used herein, is meant that volume of the portion of the formation underlying the well pattern employed as described in greater detail in above mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 3,927,716 to Burdyn et al, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

From the foregoing specification, one skilled in the art can readily ascertain the essential features of this invention and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof can adopt it to various diverse applications. It is my intention that my invention be limited and restricted only by those limitations and restrictions as appear in the appended claims.

Alameddine, Bassem R.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
11162342, Feb 07 2017 EQUINOR ENERGY AS Method and system for CO2 enhanced oil recovery
11702915, Feb 07 2017 EQUINOR ENERGY AS Method and system for Co2 enhanced oil recovery
5019279, Dec 21 1989 Marathon Oil Company Process for enriching a gas
5255740, Apr 13 1992 RRKT Company Secondary recovery process
7926561, Oct 31 2007 Shell Oil Company Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas
8136590, May 22 2006 Shell Oil Company Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas
8136592, Aug 10 2006 Shell Oil Company Methods for producing oil and/or gas
8596371, Aug 10 2006 Shell Oil Company Methods for producing oil and/or gas
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3811503,
3995693, Jan 20 1976 Phillips Petroleum Company Reservoir treatment by injecting mixture of CO2 and hydrocarbon gas
4320802, Feb 11 1980 Use of land-fill gas to stimulate crude oil production and to recover methane-rich gas
4415031, Mar 12 1982 Mobil Oil Corporation Use of recycled combustion gas during termination of an in-situ combustion oil recovery method
4664190, Dec 18 1985 Shell Western E&P Inc.; SHELL WESTERN E&P INC , Process for recovering natural gas liquids
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
May 18 1987ALAMEDDINE, BASSEM R MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A CORP OF NYASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0047120768 pdf
May 21 1987Mobil Oil Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 07 1992REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jan 23 1992REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
May 17 1992EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
May 17 19914 years fee payment window open
Nov 17 19916 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 17 1992patent expiry (for year 4)
May 17 19942 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
May 17 19958 years fee payment window open
Nov 17 19956 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 17 1996patent expiry (for year 8)
May 17 19982 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
May 17 199912 years fee payment window open
Nov 17 19996 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 17 2000patent expiry (for year 12)
May 17 20022 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)