An angular reflectance sensor having no moving parts and capable of the essentially simultaneous measurement of the reflectivity of a surface at a plurality of angles. The sensor comprises a quarter pitch graded index lens (78) having first end face (82) and second end face (84) and an optical axis (86). Light is coupled from an optical source (72) to an input position (88) on the first end face. A plurality of detectors are provided, each detector having associated therewith an output position (97-99) on the first end face. Each detector comprises a photodetector (74-76) and a fiber optic cable (94-96) for coupling light from the associated output position to the photodetector. The second end face of the lens is positioned adjacent a surface. Light reflected from the surface at a particular angle is focused by the lens to a particular output position, and thus to a particular photodetector.

Patent
   4806018
Priority
Jul 06 1987
Filed
Jul 06 1987
Issued
Feb 21 1989
Expiry
Jul 06 2007
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
37
10
all paid
8. An angular reflectance sensor for measuring the reflectance of a surface as a function of refection angle, the sensor comprising:
a lens having a positive focal length f and an optical axis;
an optical source positioned on a first side of the lens at a distance f therefrom; and
a plurality of photodetectors positioned on the first side of the lens, each photodetector being at a distance f from the lens;
whereby when the sensor is positioned such that the surface is adjacent a second side of the lens opposite the first side, each photodetector receives light from the source that has been reflected by the surface at a reflection angle that is a function of the distance of the photodetector from the optical axis.
1. An angular reflectance sensor for measuring the reflectance of a surface as a function of reflection angle, the sensor comprising:
a quarter pitch graded index lens having first and second end faces and an optical axis;
an optical source and means for coupling light from the source to an input position on the first end face of the graded index lens; and
a plurality of detectors, each detector having associated therewith an output position on the first end face of the graded index lens, each detector comprising a photodetector and means for optically coupling light from its associated output position to the photodetector, such that when the second end face of the graded index lens is positioned adjacent the surface, the light coupled to each photodetector is a measure of the reflectance of the surface at an angle that is a function of the distance between the output position associated with the photodetctor and the optical axis of the graded index lens.
2. The sensor of claim 1, wherein each means for optically coupling light comprises a fiber optic cable.
3. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the output positions form a line on the first end face.
4. The sensor of claim 3, wherein the photodetectors comprise an integrated photodetector array.
5. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the output positions form a two-dimensional array on the first end face.
6. The sensor of claim 5, wherein the photodetectors comprise a two-dimensional photodetector array.
7. The sensor of claim 6, wherein the photodetector array comprises a CCD array.

The present invention relates to a sensor for measuring the reflectance of a surface as a function of the reflection angle.

There are a number of applications in which the measurement of the angular reflectance properties or the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of a material is important. These applications include materials characterization, tactile sensors for robotics, and fluid/aerosol particle size evaluation. One material characterization application involves the measurement of paint gloss. Conventional techniques for paint gloss measurement utilize optical sensors mounted on arms, such that the angle viewed by the sensor with respect to the surface can be changed. Such designs suffer from the fact they are not compact, and involve moving parts. Another material characterization application is the determination of the finish or the smoothness of a surface. For a machined part, the surface smoothness may be particularly important if the part is to be used in a press-fit joint. Typically, surface testing of this type is done by carrying out a visual comparison of the part to be tested with a series of standard samples.

In the robotics field, surface roughness measurements can provide significant benefits in tactile sensing. For example, it is known that a person estimates the force needed to hold an object by visually estimating the surface roughness of the object to be held. Thus an angular reflectance sensor that was sufficiently compact to mount within a robot finger could provide a surface roughness measurement to a robotics system, thereby permitting the robotics system to estimate the force required to hold an object. Such measurements could also of course be used to aid in identifying the object.

It is well known that the catastrophic failure of an engine, such as an aircraft engine, is usually preceded by a sharp rise in the particulate matter suspended in the engine oil in the 15-30 minutes before failure. It is also known that the size of particles suspended in oil determines the angular reflectance characteristics of the suspension. For example, large particles tend to produce retroreflection, whereas small particles tend to produce uniform angular scattering. Thus an effective sensor for measuring the angular reflectance of a suspension could find ready application in monitoring of engine oil for contaminants.

The present invention provides an angular reflectance sensor that is capable of essentially simultaneous measurement of the reflectance of a surface at a plurality of angles. In a preferred embodiment, the sensor is extremely compact and simple in construction as compared to prior angular reflectance sensor.

In the preferred embodiment, the angular reflectance sensor comprises a quarter pitch graded index lens having first and second end faces and an optical axis. Light is coupled from an optical source to an input position on the first end face of the graded index lens. A plurality of detectors is provided, each detector having associated therewith an output position on the first end face. Each detector comprises a photodetector and means for optically coupling light from its associated output position to the photodector. Thus, when the second end face of the graded index lens is positioned adjacent the surface, the light coupled to each photodetector is a measure of the reflectance of the surface at a particular angle. The angle is a function of the distance between the output position associated with the photodetector and the optical axis of the graded index lens. An embodiment comprising a conventional converging lens is also described, in which an optical source and a plurality of photodetectors are positioned on one side of the lens at focal distance f therefrom.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the angular reflectance sensor of the present invention using a lens; and

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the angular reflectance sensor of the present invention using a graded index lens and fiber optics.

Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention is implemented using a graded index lens and fiber optic cables, the concept behind the present invention can be most readily understood with reference to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 in which a conventional converging lens is used. The system shown in FIG. 1 comprises optical source 12, a plurality of photodetectors 14-16, lens 18 and aperture forming device 20. In an actual embodiment, more than three photodetectors would typically be used. Lens 18 has an optical axis 22 and a focal length f. Source 12 and photodetectors 14-16 are positioned at distance f from the lens on a first side of the lens (the left side in FIG. 1). Aperture forming device 20 is positioned on the opposite side of the lens from the source and photodetectors, and the entire device is positioned adjacent a surface 30 whose angular reflectance characteristic is to be measured.

Because source 12 is positioned at the focal distance f from lens 18, light emitted by source 12, symbolized by rays 40 and 42, is converted by the lens into a collimated beam, symbolized by rays 44 and 46 and phantom lines 48 and 50. Thus all light from source 12 strikes surface 30 at a common angle φs. Light reflected by surface 30 is processed by lens 18 in a similar manner. In particular, all light reflected from surface 30 at a given angle will be focused by the lens to a particular point at the focal distance f from the lens. In FIG. 1, light reflected from surface 30 at an angle φd is symbolized by rays 61-63, and lens 18 focuses all such rays onto a single photodetector 15. The angle φd and the distance x between photodetector 15 and optical axis 22 of lens 18 is given by

x=f·tan φd (1)

As a result, each photodetector 14-16 responds to the light reflected from surface 30 at a particular reflectance angel φd. Measurement of the light output by the photodetectors thus provides a direct measure of the angular reflectance characteristic of the surface.

A second and preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2. This embodiment includes optical source 72, a plurality of photodetectors 74-76, quarter pitch GRIN lens 78 and aperture-forming device 80. GRIN lens 78 has a cylindrical shape, and includes opposed faces 82 and 84 and optical axis 86. Source 72 is coupled to face 82 by fiberoptic cable 90, and photodetectors 74-76 are coupled to face 82 by fiberoptic cables 94-96, respectively. Fiber optic cable 90 contacts face 82 at input position 88, and fiber optic cables 94-96 contact face 82 at output positions 97-99, respectively. Aperture-forming device 80 is positioned adjacent face 84. In use, the sensor is positioned such that face 84 is positioned adjacent surface 100 whose angular reflectance characteristic is to be measured.

A quarter pitch GRIN lens has the property that its index of refraction n at a given point within the lens is a quadratic function of the distance of the point from optical axis 86, i.e.,

n(x)=n0 -n1 x2 (2)

where x is the distance from optical axis 86. As a result, light entering face 82 of GRIN lens 78 at a particular distance x from the optical axis is refracted such that it strikes surface 100 at a single angle φs that is a function of the distance between the point of enry of the light at face 82 and optical axis 86. In a similar manner, all light leaving surface 100 at a particular angle φd is refracted by GRIN lens 78 to a particular point on face 82. As a result, the amount of light received by each photodetector 74-76 is a function of the position of the corresponding output positions, and in particular the distance from the output position to optical axis 86. Thus functionally, the embodiment of FIG. 2 operates in a manner similar to that of the embodiment of FIG. 1. However, unlike the embodiment of FIG. 1, the embodiment of FIG. 2 can be constructed such that source 72 and photodetectors 74-76 are remote from quarter pitch GRIN lens 78 and surface 100, thereby enabling a much more compact sensor to be fabricated. For example, a typical quarter pitch GRIN lens has a length of 10 mm and a diameter of 2-3 mm. From twenty to thirty fiber optic cables of 100 micron diameter can be abutted against face 82 of such a GRIN lens, to provide a compact and versatile angular reflectance sensor.

For many materials, the angular reflectance characteristic will be essentially independent of the angle at which light from the illumination source strikes the surface. For such materials, for both of the illustrated embodiments, source 12 could be placed at any position with respect to the optical axis. However, the position illustrated, at one edge of the lens, will in general be preferred because it provides the greatest range and the least redundancy in the information collected. For example, were the input position to be located on the optical axis, then the photodetectors having output positions on opposite sides of the input position would collect redundant information. Furthermore, locating the input position on the optical axis would make it impossible to precisely measure specular reflection in which φs is equal to φd.

In a preferred embodiment, photodetectors 74-76 could comprise a photodetector array, together with conventional sampling circuitry so that all data could be collected over a very short time interval, i.e., essentially simultaneously. This feature illustrates the significant advantage of the present invention with respect to prior reflectance measuring devices in which the sensor is mounted to an arm that is oriented at various angles with respect to the surface. In the latter type of sensor, the arm must be continuously moved, and data collected serialy at the various sensor positions.

For measuring the reflectance of a surface that is not structured, photodetectors 74-76 may comprise a one-dimensional photodetector array, and output positions 97-99 could similraly be arranged in a one-dimensional line across face 82. For a structured surface in which the reflectance is a function of the orientation of the plane defined by the source and detector with respect to the surface, a two-dimensional photodetector array could advantageously be employed. Because of the significant number of detectors involved in a two-dimensional array, a CCD array would be preferred for such an embodiment. In general, the maximum off-axis angle that could be handled by the sensor shown in FIG. 2 would be the angle whose sine was equal to the numerical aperture of fiber optic cables 90 and 94-96. Since a typical upper limit for a numerical aperture of fiber optic cables is 0.3, a maximum off-axis angle of about 17°-18° can readily be achieved.

While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments described, and the true scope of the invention is to be determined by reference to the following claims.

Falk, Robert A.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10121687, Mar 03 2014 Coherent LaserSystems GmbH & Co. KG Monitoring method and apparatus for control of excimer laser annealing
4991971, Feb 13 1989 Inliten, LLC Fiber optic scatterometer for measuring optical surface roughness
5155549, Oct 25 1990 The Research of State University of New York Method and apparatus for determining the physical properties of materials using dynamic light scattering techniques
5703692, Aug 03 1995 Nanometrics Incorporated Lens scatterometer system employing source light beam scanning means
6504617, May 10 1999 Metso Paper Automation Oy Method and measuring arrangement for measuring paper surface
6921898, Jun 20 2002 NUEVOLUTION A S Bi-directional reflectance distribution function determination by large scale field measurement
6987568, Nov 15 2000 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Apparatus and method for measuring spatially varying bidirectional reflectance distribution function
7428057, Jan 20 2005 Zygo Corporation Interferometer for determining characteristics of an object surface, including processing and calibration
7446882, Jan 20 2005 Zygo Corporation Interferometer for determining characteristics of an object surface
7456975, Sep 15 2003 Zygo Corporation Methods and systems for interferometric analysis of surfaces and related applications
7466429, Mar 06 2003 Zygo Corporation Profiling complex surface structures using scanning interferometry
7522288, Jul 21 2006 Zygo Corporation Compensation of systematic effects in low coherence interferometry
7586620, Sep 15 2003 Zygo Corporation Methods and systems for interferometric analysis of surfaces and related applications
7616323, Jan 20 2005 Zygo Corporation Interferometer with multiple modes of operation for determining characteristics of an object surface
7619746, Jul 19 2007 Zygo Corporation Generating model signals for interferometry
7636168, Oct 11 2005 Zygo Corporation Interferometry method and system including spectral decomposition
7684049, Mar 06 2003 Zygo Corporation Interferometer and method for measuring characteristics of optically unresolved surface features
7699236, Apr 28 2004 Rutgers The State University Method and apparatus for making and detecting a document verification indicator using optical pattern encryption
7812963, Sep 09 2002 Zygo Corporation Interferometry method for ellipsometry, reflectometry, and scatterometry measurements, including characterization of thin film structures
7869057, Sep 09 2002 Zygo Corporation Multiple-angle multiple-wavelength interferometer using high-NA imaging and spectral analysis
7884947, Jan 20 2005 Zygo Corporation Interferometry for determining characteristics of an object surface, with spatially coherent illumination
7889355, Jan 31 2007 Zygo Corporation Interferometry for lateral metrology
7924435, Dec 22 2006 Zygo Corporation Apparatus and method for measuring characteristics of surface features
7948636, Mar 06 2003 Zygo Corporation Interferometer and method for measuring characteristics of optically unresolved surface features
7952724, Jan 20 2005 Zygo Corporation Interferometer with multiple modes of operation for determining characteristics of an object surface
7978337, Nov 13 2007 Zygo Corporation Interferometer utilizing polarization scanning
7978338, Nov 26 2008 Zygo Corporation Compound reference interferometer
8004688, Nov 26 2008 Zygo Corporation Scan error correction in low coherence scanning interferometry
8072611, Oct 12 2007 Zygo Corporation Interferometric analysis of under-resolved features
8107085, Sep 15 2003 Zygo Corporation Methods and systems for interferometric analysis of surfaces and related applications
8120781, Nov 26 2008 Zygo Corporation Interferometric systems and methods featuring spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data
8126677, Dec 14 2007 Zygo Corporation Analyzing surface structure using scanning interferometry
8379218, Nov 26 2008 Zygo Corporation Fiber-based interferometer system for monitoring an imaging interferometer
8902431, Nov 26 2008 Zygo Corporation Low coherence interferometry with scan error correction
9025162, Jan 31 2007 Zygo Corporation Interferometry for lateral metrology
9335276, Mar 03 2014 COHERENT LASERSYSTEMS GMBH & CO KG Monitoring method and apparatus for control of excimer laser annealing
9976969, Oct 28 2016 COHERENT LASERSYSTEMS GMBH & CO KG Monitoring method and apparatus for excimer-laser annealing process
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3984189, Jan 19 1973 Hitachi Electronics, Ltd.; Nisshin Steel Co. Method and apparatus for detecting defects in a surface regardless of surface finish
4092068, May 05 1976 Domtar Inc. Surface sensor
4111524, Apr 14 1977 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Wavelength division multiplexer
4208094, Oct 02 1978 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Optical switch
4213708, Jun 27 1978 Domtar Inc. Graininess sensor
4239330, Oct 18 1978 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Multiple optical switch
4412746, Jul 16 1980 The President of Muroran Institute for Technology Optical noncontacting detector
4474424, Mar 20 1981 AT&T Bell Laboratories Optical multi/demultiplexer using interference filters
4479717, Jun 23 1981 Compagnie Industrielle des Lasers Cilas Alcatel Apparatus for measuring the position of an object
4554449, Apr 30 1982 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Fiber optic magnetic field sensor
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jun 22 1987FALK, ROBERT A BOEING COMPANY THEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0047520286 pdf
Jul 06 1987The Boeing Company(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Sep 22 1992REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Sep 30 1992M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 30 1992M186: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity.
Nov 23 1992ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Jul 02 1996M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 08 2000ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Mar 08 2000RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Aug 18 2000M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 21 19924 years fee payment window open
Aug 21 19926 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 21 1993patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 21 19952 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 21 19968 years fee payment window open
Aug 21 19966 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 21 1997patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 21 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 21 200012 years fee payment window open
Aug 21 20006 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 21 2001patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 21 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)