An ion generation system employed in forming electrostatic images on a dielectric surface in which compensation is made for variations in the electrostatic images. The desired compensation is accomplished by spacial or electrical adjustments of electrode apertures, or by adjusting their relation to the dielectric cylinder, so that more uniform electrostatic images are produced.
|
9. electrostatic imaging apparatus comprising
a plurality of ion generating aperture sources; means for collecting the ions generated by said aperture sources to form individual electrostatic images each source producing an electrostatic image of different size; and means for compensating for size variations in said images.
1. A method of generating compensated electrostatic images, which comprises the steps of:
applying a first time-varying potential between a first electrode adjacent a dielectric member and a second apertured electrode adjacent an opposite portion of said dielectric member to generate ions in the aperture, extracting generated ions by applying a second variable potential vc between the second electrode and a further electrode member and depositing said ions on a dielectric receptive surface, controlling the size of electrostatic images generated on the dielectric receptive surface.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
10. Apparatus as defined in
11. Apparatus as defined in
12. Apparatus as defined in
13. Apparatus as defined in
14. Apparatus as defined in
15. Apparatus as defined in
16. Apparatus as defined in
17. Apparatus as defined in
18. Apparatus as defined in
|
This invention relates to ion generation, and more particularly, to the compensation for stroke width variations in ion generation imaging.
There are a number of techniques for generating ions to form electrostatic images. These include air gap breakdown, corona discharges, and spark discharges.
Particularly suitable for electrostatic imaging is a device disclosed in Fotland et al. U.S. Pat. 4,155,093. This patent discloses an ion generating device with a solid dielectric member contacted on opposite sides by two electrodes. One of the electrodes contains apertures or edge surfaces, located opposite the other electrode. A varying high voltage applied between the two electrodes generates a pool of positive and negative ions in the apertures. These ions may be extracted by a potential applied between the apertured electrode and a counterelectrode. This apparatus is suitable for electrostatic imaging in that apertures may be configured in a desired shape to create an electrostatic image of corresponding shape. A multiplexible imaging device may be created by patterning an array of opposing electrodes in the matrix crossover arrangement disclosed in Fotland et al. U.S. Pat. 4,267,556. Ions are extracted to form a latent electrostatic pattern of images on an adjacent dielectric member, normally consisting of discrete dots. These discrete images or dots overlap to form particular letters, characters, or symbols. A lesser constant potential may be applied to a third electrode, known disclosed in Carrish U.S. Pat. 4,160,257. The screen electrode is used to counteract the tendency of an electrostatic image of given polarity to attract oppositely charged ions from the discharge aperture when the direct current potential is removed between the control electrode and the conducting sublayer. It was found that the screen electrode provides control over image size by varying the size of the screen aperture, or by varying the voltage applied to the screen electrode, or by varying the distance between the screen electrode aperture and the dielectric cylinder. A reduction in the screen aperture size, for without any compromise in the image charge. This control over image size did not resolve the problem of variations in image size between two or more adjacent images. The failure to independently control individual image size has limited the printing capability of the system.
The stroke width, or the width of the printed image created by the electrostatic discharge from the cartridge, must fall within a certain range of values in order to obtain the desired visual qualities. As the human eye is sensitive to abrupt changes in stroke width, such changes will detract from the visual uniformity and sharpness necessary for many printing applications. The geometry of, or the potential applied to, each aperture of the screen electrode can be varied to compensate for any known change in stroke width. Such changes in stroke width can occur in several ways, for example, realignment of the cartridge with respect to the cylinder. The present invention is designed to compensate for stroke width variations resulting from changes in the distance between the discharge electrode and the dielectric surface on which ions are deposited over the areal extent of the array of electrodes. In practice it was found that this change in distance, caused by the cylindrical shape of the dielectric cylinder and/or reorientation of the cartridge with respect to the cylinder, was the source of these fringe effects. Such reoreintation or skewing of the cartridge is necessary to adjust for the realignment of the printed image caused by the skewing of the image and transfer cylinders. As disclosed in Ser. No. 180,218, the skewing of these cylinders is used to increase the toner transfer efficiency.
Accordingly, it is the principal object of the invention to maintain control over the individual size of electrostatic images generated on the dielectric receptive surface.
A further object of the invention is to enhance the print quality by maintaining uniformly sized electrostatic images that are generated on the dielectric receptive surface.
The above and related objects are achieved by adjusting the size, or the voltage, or the distance to the dielectric material, of each aperture in the array of electrode apertures. The problem of stroke width variation arises where the distance between the cartridge and the dielectric material increases because of the curved surface of the dielectric opposite the screen electrode, or due to some reorientation of the cartridge with respect to the dielectric material. The number of ions transported between the cartridge and the dielectric material decreases as this distance increases. One embodiment of the invention increases the size of the individual apertures to offset any increase in the cartridge-dielectric distance so that a greater number of ions are transported to the dielectric surface thereby maintaining the necessary stroke width. The extent to which it is necessary to increase aperture size laterally across the array of electrodes may be determined by experimental means.
A second embodiment of the invention increases or decreases the number of ions transported through an aperture so as to maintain uniform stroke width by varying the potential applied at the aperture. As a result different apertures will have different potentials applied depending on their distance from the dielectric material.
A third embodiment of the invention consists of altering the flat surface of the cartridge opposite the dielectric material so that the distance between the electrodes and the dielectric member does not vary between adjacent electrode apertures. This results in a curved array of electrodes whose apertures are equidistant from the electrostatic images on the dielectric member which each aperture produces in conjunction with the ion generator.
A fourth embodiment of the invention involves the use of a flat dielectric member on which the electrostatic images are generated.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the printing apparatus with the ion cartridge exposed to illustrate the relationship to the underlying dielectric cylinder.
FIG. 2 is a schematic and sectional view of an ion generator in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view showing the operating relationship between the cylinder and the cartridge.
FIG. 4A is a sectional view illustrating cartridge tilt with respect to the cylinder.
FIG. 4B is a sectional view illustrating cartridge skew with respect to the associated dielectric cylinder.
FIG. 5A is a plot of stroke width for an uncompensated cartridge.
FIG. 5B is a plot of stroke width for a compensated cartridge.
FIG. 6 is a screen electrode layout in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 7 is a comparison of a screen electrode layout with and without overhang.
Reference should be had to FIGS. 3-7 for a detailed description of the invention. The devices used to achieve a controlled image typically utilize an ion generator 20 shown in the sectional view of FIG. 2. The ion generator includes a first electrode 21 and a second electrode 25, separated by a dielectric layer 19. A source 22 of alternating potential between the first and second electrodes is used to generate ions by providing an air gap breakdown in aperture 24.
This device may also incorporate a third, screen electrode 29 which is separated from the second electrode by a second dielectric layer 27. The second dielectric layer 27 has an aperture 26 positioned under aperture 24 in the second electrode. The screen electrode 29 contains an aperture 28 which is at least partially positioned under apertures 24 and 26. When the circuit is closed at switch 23, a potential 33 is applied to the second electrode 25, and a potential 32 is applied to the screen electrode 29. This operates to extract ions generated at electrode aperture 24, and transport them through the screen electrode aperture 28 to the surface 31 of the dielectric member 30.
The application of the ion generator for electrographic printing uses an array with first and second electrodes configured in matrix form. To maximize print quality it is advantageous to maintain uniform size of images produced across this array of ion generators. The invention overcomes problems of non-uniformity by maintaining control over the image size or stroke width produced by each ion generator. For example, a reduction in the size or an increase in the voltage 32 of the screen aperture 28 causes a corresponding reduction of latent image size on the surface of dielectric member 31, without any compromise in image charge. Image size may thereby be controlled to compensate for any variation among ion generators in the array as to the distance between the discharge aperture of the generator and the point where the image is formed on the dielectric receptive surface 31.
The operating relationship of the cartridge 20 and the dielectric member 30, a cylinder in this case, is illustrated in FIG. 3. As the distance 10 from the center of the cartridge to each aperture 12 increases, the distance 11 from the electrode aperture to the dielectric cylinder increases. This variation of the distance 11 may result from the uneven shape of the dialectric receptive surface 31 and/or the reorientation of the cartridge 20 with respect to said dielectric surface. As the distance 11 increases, the size of the screen electrode aperture 24 may be increased to maintain uniform image size on the dielectric cylinder 30. The voltage 32 applied at the screen electrode aperture 24 may also be altered as the distance 11 varies so that the size of the electrostatic image can be controlled.
When the cartridge 20 is tilted by an angle 13 with respect to the dielectric cylinder 30 as shown in FIG. 4A, this will cause an additional variation in the distance between the screen electrode and the cylinder, with resultant changes in electrostatic image size which may also be corrected by adjusting the size or voltage of individual apertures 28.
Similarly, when the cartridge 20 is skewed by an angle 14 with respect to the cylinder 30, as shown in FIG. 4B, the individual apertures may be adjusted to compensate for any variations in image size created by the associated changes in distance between each individual aperture and the position on the cylinder 30 where the corresponding electrostatic image is generated.
A plot of the variation of stroke width as a function of the driver electrode position is shown in FIG. 5A, where the screen electrode has the same aperture size throughout. This plot demonstrates the typical variation in stroke width for an uncompensated screen electrode indicating larger stroke widths towards the middle of the cartridge where the distance between the cartridge and cylinder is shortest, and smaller stroke widths at the two sides of the cartridge where the distance from the cartridge to the cylinder has increased due to the curved surface of the cylinder. FIG. 5B illustrates how the screen aperture size may be tapered across the driver electrodes or "RF lines," of the cartridge so as to produce strokes of more uniform size.
Illustrated in FIG. 6 is a screen electrode where the individual apertures in the screen electrode have been set at one of six listed diameters. Each skewed row of screen electrode apertures ranges from the smallest value of 0.0065 inches in the center, to 0.0072 inches at the two ends of the row. This taper of screen electrode aperture size results in a more uniform image size or stroke width.
FIG. 7 shows the possible variation in screen aperture size where the cartridge has been skewed with respect to the cylinder as shown in FIG. 4B. In this case there are sixteen first or driver electrodes with associated screen electrode aperture sizes varying between 0.0065 inches at the center of the cartridge and 0.0070 inches at the outermost apertures. When the cartridge is skewed so that this line of driver electrodes is shifted by two apertures, the aperture size varies from 0.0068 inches at one end to 0.0065 inches at the center, to 0.0072 inches at the end where apertures are furthest from the dielectric cylinder.
Where the screen electrode aperture voltage is used to control stroke width in a non-skewed cartridge, the potential may be varied from Vc at the center to Ve at both ends of a row of apertures to compensate for the change in distance between the cartridge and a dielectric cylinder. Increasing the absolute value of the potential on the screen electrode decreases the image diameter.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4891656, | Dec 14 1988 | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC | Print cartridge with non-divergent electrostatic field |
4992807, | May 04 1990 | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC | Gray scale printhead system |
5087933, | Dec 31 1990 | Xerox Corporation | In situ inonographic uniformity correction |
5159358, | Jun 19 1991 | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC | Divided screen printer |
5315323, | Mar 22 1991 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Color image forming apparatus with means for biasing a recording head |
6386684, | Aug 23 2000 | Logical Imaging Solutions, Inc.; LOGICAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC | Curved print head for charged particle generation |
6501494, | May 09 2001 | Xerox Corporation | Thin film printhead with layered dielectric |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4435066, | Mar 16 1981 | Konishiroku Photo Industry Co., Ltd. | Ion modulating electrode with improved transmission factor |
4495508, | Nov 05 1980 | Konishiroku Photo Industry Co., Ltd. | Electrostatic reproducing apparatus |
4626876, | Jan 25 1984 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Solid state corona discharger |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 04 1986 | BEAUDET, LEO A | Dennison Manufacturing Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004622 | /0840 | |
Oct 23 1986 | Dennison Manufacturing Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 01 1990 | Dennison Manufacturing Company | DELPHAX SYSTEMS, A CORP OF MA | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005261 | /0773 | |
Dec 18 2001 | Delphax Systems | Check Technology Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012280 | /0469 | |
Dec 18 2001 | DELPHAX SYSTES, INC | Check Technology Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012280 | /0469 | |
Dec 18 2001 | Xerox Corporation | Check Technology Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012280 | /0469 | |
Dec 20 2001 | Check Technology Corporation | Harris Trust and Savings Bank | PATENT COLLATERAL AGREEMENT | 012287 | /0049 | |
Mar 31 2002 | Check Technology Corporation | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012590 | /0450 | |
Oct 15 2002 | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC | Harris Trust and Savings Bank | PATENT COLLETERAL AGREEMENT | 013169 | /0367 | |
Feb 04 2004 | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC | LASALLE BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 016460 | /0485 | |
Feb 05 2004 | HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AN ILLINOIS BANKING CORPORATION | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MINNESOTA CORPORATION | RELEASE OF LIENS AND SECURITY INTERESTS | 015829 | /0710 | |
Feb 05 2004 | HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AN ILLINOIS BANKING CORPORATION | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC | RELEASE OF LIENS AND SECURITY INTERESTS | 015361 | /0090 | |
Sep 10 2007 | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES INC | WHITEBOX DELPHAX, LTD | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 020143 | /0628 | |
May 11 2009 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC | DELPHAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022742 | /0984 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 28 1992 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 06 1992 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 23 1996 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 11 2000 | M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 14 2002 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Aug 14 2002 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 04 1992 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 04 1992 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 04 1993 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 04 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 04 1996 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 04 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 04 1997 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 04 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 04 2000 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 04 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 04 2001 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 04 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |