A process for automatic fusion welding of rails by a combination of submerged arc welding and electroslag welding, comprising a root run for welding a rail base by submerged arc welding and, without interruption of the welding, subsequent runs for welding the rail base and welding a region from a rail web to a rail head by electroslag welding; wherein, during all of the runs, a metal mold is mounted on an upper surface of the rail base and a metal shoe is mounted on the metal mold to prevent an outflow of molten slag and molten metal and, during all of the runs, welding is performed by using a dc welding transformer having constant potential characterisitcs, a filler-wire having a diameter of from 1.2 to 2.0 mm, and a fused-type flux. The inventive process avoids the use of different fluxes and an alteration of welding machine conditions during the whole sequence of welding from the rail base through to the rail head.
|
1. A process for automatic fusion welding of rails by a combination of submerged arc welding and electroslag welding, said rails having a base, a web, and a head, said process comprising:
performing an initial root weld run on the rail base using submerged arc welding and thereafter, without interruption of welding, performing subsequent weld runs on the rail base, followed by the rail web, and then the rail head using electroslag welding until completion of welding; during all of said welding runs, preventing outflow of molten slag and molten metal by providing a metal mold mounted on an upper surface of the rail base and a metal shoe mounted on the metal mold; performing all of said welding runs by using a dc welding power source providing a dc current and having constant potential characteristics, by using a filler wire having a diameter of form 1.2 to 2.0 mm, and by using a fused type flux comprising, as a main component, at least 15 to 45% of CaF2 and 15 to 35% of TiO2, wherein the total amount of CaF2 and TiO2 is at least 50%.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the automatic fusion welding of rails.
2. Description of the Related Art
The enclosed arc welding and thermit welding processes are widely employed for the field welding of rails, since they do not require that the rails be pressed together in the direction of the rail axis during welding. However, enclosed arc welding is not in automatic fusion welding process and, therefore, takes a long time, and the quality stability of the welded joint depends on the skill of the welding operater. The thermit welding is quicker when field welding rails. However, discontinuities or weld defects are likely to occur in the thermit-welded joints, the soundness of which also depends on the skill of the welding operator. To overcome these drawbacks, many processes of automatic fusion welding have been studied as an alternative process for welding rails, and a process was disclosed in Japanese Examined Patent Publication (Kokoku) No. 44-24249 as an alternative to enclosed arc welding and thermit welding. In this known process, the rail base is welded by submerged arc welding and the rail web, head and other portions are welded by electroslag welding.
The known process has advantages in that it does not require that the rails be pressed together in the direction of the rail axis, because it is a fusion welding process, and in that an improved efficiency is expected in comparison with the enclosed arc welding. However, several problems still remain, as follows.
In the known process, the slag formed during the submerged arc welding must be removed at the completion of each welding run. Moreover, when welding of the rail base is completed, the welding is interrupted and then the electroslag welding is carried out to weld the rail web and head. This causes a lack of fusion, hot cracks, and other weld defects upon the initiation and the termination of each run of welding, which lead to an impairment of the process efficiency. Further disadvantages arise in that different fluxes, varied welding machine conditions, etc., are required for welding the rail base and for welding the rail web and head, and these operational complexities will result in a lowered efficiency, the need for expensive welding equipment, and a complex management of consumable materials.
The object of the present invention is to solve the above-described problems.
This object is achieved, according to the present invention, by a process for automatic fusion welding of rails by a combination of submerged arc welding and electroslag welding, comprising a root run for welding a rail base by submerged arc welding and, without interruption of said welding, subsequent runs for welding the rail base and welding a region from a rail web to a rail head by electroslag welding; wherein, during all of said runs, a metal mold is mounted on an upper surface of the rail base and a metal shoe is mounted on the metal mold to prevent an outflow of molten slag and molten metal and, during all of said runs, welding is performed by using a DC welding transformer having constant potential characteristics, a filler-wire having a diameter of from 1.2 to 2.0 mm, and a fused-type flux.
In the process according to the present invention, the fused-type flux preferably contains, as the main components, at least CaF2 and TiO2 in amounts of from 15 to 45% and from 15 to 35%, respectively, the total amount of CaF2 and TiO2 being 50% or more.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a side view of the embodiment shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a cross sectional view showing the first run of welding of the rail base according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a cross sectional view showing the second and subsequent runs of welding of the rail base according to the present invention; and,
FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view showing operations during the welding of the rail web and head according to the present invention.
Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, rails 1 and 2, the members to be welded, are placed so that a suitable gap is set between the ends of these two rails. A backing 3 is pressed against the back of the rail base and co-operates with a copper plate 4 in the forming of a root bead. A pair of copper molds 5 and 6 are mounted on the upper surface of the rail base at both sides of the rails 1 and 2, respectively, to enclose the welding groove defined by the rail edges and thereby prevent molten metal from flowing out of the groove. Copper shoes 7 and 8 for welding the rail web and head are mounted on the top surfaces of the copper molds 5 and 6 and can be slidably moved, as welding proceeds, in the directions of the arrows 9 and 10 by a driving means (not shown) such as a motor, a hydraulic drive mechanism, or the like. A guide tube 12 guides a filler wire 11 into the groove and feeds power from a welding transformer to the filler wire 11. The guide tube 12 is held by a horizontal travelling member 14 and a fixture 16 through a holder 17 and a connecting plate 18. The horizontal travelling member 14 travels along a horizontal axis as shown by an arrow 13, and the fixture 16 moves vertically as shown by an arrow 15. A guide rail 19 guides the fixture 16. Welding proceeds is such a way that the tip of the filler wire 11 runs along a trace 20 as shown in FIG. 2. When and after the tip enters the rail web region, i.e., passes a point "A" of the trace 20, the copper shoes 7 and 8 are positioned as shown by 7a and 8a, respectively.
Referring to FIGS. 3 to 5, a process according to the present invention will be described in more detail together with the welding sequence.
FIG. 3 schematically shows a root welding at the rail base. Numeral 21 denotes a fused-type flux, 22 a solidified root bead, and 23 a slag covering the bead 22. Welding proceeds as the guide tube 12 moves from a position 12a to the right in the Figure. The flux 21 is scattered within the copper molds 5 and 6 so that it covers the groove to protect the welding arc against air and to be partially melted to form a slag which covers a molten pool and the vicinity thereof. As welding proceeds, the backing 3 is also partially melted to cover the back side of the bead 22 with a thin layer of slag and form a smooth bead. In the submerged arc welding for welding of the root run, fused-type flux is suitably used to ensure a stable welding during the subsequent electroslag welding of the sequent runs even when a molten slag bath is shallow and also most suitably a backing 3 of laminated glass tapes with a backup support of copper plate 4 is used to prevent an excess reinforcement of the root bead at the base side even when the groove has an "I"-shape and a relatively large root gap of 12 to 20 mm.
FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the welding of the second and the subsequent runs at the rail base. Welding is performed by electroslag welding. FIG. 4 depicts a stage of the welding sequence near completion when welding of the rail base has proceeded to the fifth run. FIG. 4 includes beads 24 of the second and the subsequent runs a slag bath 25, and copper shoes 7b and 8b used for welding the rail web and head, respectively.
Welding of the second run is performed after the welding of the root run described above by moving the guide tube in the reverse direction without interrupting welding. In the welding of the second run, if the guide tube 12 travels at the same speed as used during the welding of the root run, a solidified slag 23 cannot be remelted, which causes an unstable welding arc and, in turn, welding per se. To avoid this problem, the guide tube 12 travels at a speed 30 to 70% lower than that used for welding of the root run, with the result that the solidified slag 23 is remelted and the non-molten part of the flux 21 scattered during welding of the root run is also melted to form a slag, which both lead to the formation of a slag for electroslag welding. Welding of the rail base is thus shifted from the submerged arc welding to the electroslag welding when welding of the second run starts, and welding proceeds to weld the subsequent runs by a repeated, reciprocal travelling of the guide tube 12. The stroke of the horizontal travel of the guide tube 12 is preferably stepped down at each half of one reciprocation cycle to prevent a formation of an excess reinforcement of the weld and reduce the welding finishing work. The copper shoes 7 and 8 are brought close to the rail web step by step as the stroke of the guide tube 12 is stepped down and are positioned at the vicinity of the rail base, as shown by 7b and 8b in FIG. 4, when welding of the rail base is almost completed, to stand by for a quick shift of the welding from the rail base to the rail web.
Welding of the rail web and head will be described with reference to FIG. 5. FIG. 5 shows a guide tube position 12b and a molten slag bath 26 during welding of the rail web, as well as guide tube positions 12c and 12d and a molten slag bath 27 during welding of the rail head. Welding of the rail head is performed by a repeated, reciprocal travelling of the guide tube within the region between the positions 12c and 12d, as shown in the figure. The copper shoes 7 and 8 are pressed against the rail and are in close contact therewith to prevent a flow out of the slag 26 or 27 and adjust the bead shape.
After the electroslag welding of the rail base a described with reference to FIG. 4, the horizontal travel of the guide tube 12 is stopped midway in the rail width and then the electroslag welding of the rail web is performed by moving the guide tube 12 only upward. When the welding of the rail web is completed and the guide tube 12 enters the rail head region, the reciprocal, horizontal travel of the guide tube 12 is restarted and the stroke of the reciprocal, horizontal travel is gradually substantially increased up to the entire width of the rail head, with the result that welding is performed by a reciprocal, horizontal travel of the guide tube between the positions 12c and 12d. As the electroslag welding proceeds from the rail base to the rail head, flux is fed to make up for the decrease of the slag bath depth.
In the present invention, the following welding conditions for the filler wire size, the welding transformer, the flux type, etc., are suitable from the viewpoints of welding workability and weld performance.
A filler-wire is suitable to shift welding continuously from the submerged arc welding to the electroslag welding without changing the flux and removal of the slag, since such wires are easily melted even when the slag bath depth is small, such as during the welding of the rail base. The optimum filler wire diameter ranges from 1.2 to 2.0 mm. A wire diameter less than 1.2 mm results in a poor arc force and a small arc spread and, therefore, cannot provide a preferable root bead. A wire having a diameter exceeding 2.0 mm is not easily melted in a shallow slag bath.
A DC welding transformer having constant potential characteristics is suitably used with a constant wire feed rate to successfully perform the submerged arc welding and the electroslag welding with a filler wire.
Fused-type flux is suitable for providing a good workability in both the submerged arc welding and the electroslag welding.
The present inventors have found that the fused-type flux preferably contains, as main components, at least CaF2 and TiO2. When a fused-type flux containing these components as main components is used, the amount of CaF2 and the amount of TiO2 in the flux is suitably within the ranges of from 15 to 45% and from 15 to 35%, respectively, the total amount of CaF2 and TiO2 being 50% or more. An amount of CaF2 less than 15% results in an unsuccessful welding shift from the submerged arc welding to the electroslag welding. An amount of CaF2 of more than 45% causes a pollution of the work environment due to the emission of fluoride gases. The component TiO2 is used in combination with the component CaF2 to ensure that the electric conductivity of the slag is at a suitable value during the electroslag welding. An amount of TiO2 of less than 15% cannot provide this effect. An amount of TiO2 of more than 35% results in an elevation of the melting point of the slag and welding cannot be successfully shifted from the submerged arc welding to the electroslag welding. The total amount of CaF2 and TiO2 contained as main components in the flux is suitably 50% or more, to ensure a successful welding shift from the submerged arc welding to the electroslag welding and a good welding workability.
Examples according to the present invention, and comparative examples, will be described below.
A 132 lb-rail for railroad used was butt-welded in the constitution and process sequence according to the present invention.
The welding materials used are as follows:
Filler wire: 1.6 mm-diameter solid wire,
Flux: fused-type flux, CaF2 35%--TiO2 30%--CaO 20%--SiO2 15%,
Backing: four 1.0 mm-thick glass tapes laminated,
Welding transformer: constant potential characteristics, DC transformer with 500 A rated current.
The welding condition is shown in Table 1.
A 132 lb-rail for railroad use was butt-welded in the constitution and process sequence according to the present invention.
The welding materials used are as follows:
Filler wire: 1.6 mm-diameter solid wire,
Flux: fused-type flux, CaF2 31%--TiO2 28%--CaO 17%--SiO2 22%--MgO 2%,
Backing: four 1.0 mm-thick glass tapes laminated plus block,
Welding transformer: constant potential characteristics, DC transformer with 500 A rated current.
The welding condition is shown in Table 2.
A 132 lb-rail for railroad used was butt-welded in the constitution and process sequence according to the present invention.
The welding materials used are as follows:
Filler wire: 1.2 mm-diameter solid wire,
Flux: fused-type flux, CaF2 40%--TiO2 20% - CaO 15%--SiO2 19%--Al2 O3 6%,
Backing: four 1.0 mm-thick glass tapes laminated,
Welding transformer: constant potential characteristics, DC transformer with 500 A rated current.
The welding condition is shown in Table 3.
A 132 lb-rail for railroad use was butt-welded in the constitution and process sequence according to the present invention.
The welding materials used are as follows:
Filler wire: 2.0 mm-diameter solid wire,
Flux: fused-type flux, CaF2 25%--TiO2 25%--CaO 18%--SiO2 20%--MgO 5%--ZrO2 7%,
Backing: 1.0 mm-thick glass tape plus block,
Welding tranformer: constant potential characteristics, DC transformer with 600 A rated current.
The welding condition is shown in Table 4.
In the Examples 1 to 4 according to the present invention, welding took about 14 min except for the necessary preparation and after-treatment and a high work efficiency was achieved without weld defects.
A 132 lb-rail for railroad use was butt-welded in the constitution below.
The welding materials used are as follows:
Filler wire: 3.2 mm-diameter solid wire,
Flux: fused-type flux, CaF2 25%--TiO2 27%--CaO 16%--SiO2 28%--MgO 45,
Backing: four 1.0 mm-thick glass tapes laminated,
Welding transformer: constant potential characteristics, DC transformer with 600 A rated current.
The welding condition is shown in Table 5.
Welding after the second run of the rail base could not be performed, because the filler diameter exceeded the specified range of the present invention, with the result that a good electroslag welding was not maintained.
A 132 lb-rail for railroad use was butt-welded in the constitution below.
The welding materials used are as follows:
Filler wire: 1.6 mm-diameter solid wire,
Flux: bond type flux, CaF2 14%--TiO2 20%-- CaO 5%--SiO2 25%--Al2 O3 36%,
Backing: four 1.0 mm-thick glass tapes laminated,
Welding transformer: constant potential characteristics, DC transformer with 500 A rated current.
The welding condition is shown in Table 6.
Welding after the second run could not be performed, because the flux type used was unsuitable with the result that welding was not successfully shifted from the submerged arc welding to the electroslag welding.
| TABLE 1 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Welding Speed |
| Welding Welding (cm/min) |
| Current Voltage Upward Horizontal |
| Position |
| (A) (V) Movement |
| Travel |
| ______________________________________ |
| Base |
| Root 450 47 -- 30 |
| Run |
| 2nd to 400 40 -- 20 |
| 5th Run |
| Web 380 36 6.0 -- |
| Head 380 36 1.5 120 |
| ______________________________________ |
| (Root gap = 17 mm) |
| TABLE 2 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Welding Speed |
| Welding Welding (cm/min) |
| Current Voltage Upward Horizontal |
| Position |
| (A) (V) Movement |
| Travel |
| ______________________________________ |
| Base |
| Root 450 48 -- 20 |
| Run |
| 2nd Run 400 38 -- 8 |
| 3rd to 380 36 -- 20 |
| 7th Run |
| Web 380 36 6.0 -- |
| Head 380 36 1.5 24 |
| ______________________________________ |
| (Root gap = 17 mm) |
| TABLE 3 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Welding Speed |
| Welding Welding (cm/min) |
| Current Voltage Upward Horizontal |
| Position |
| (A) (V) Movement |
| Travel |
| ______________________________________ |
| Base |
| Root 400 45 -- 17 |
| Run |
| 2nd Run 350 35 -- 5 |
| 3rd to 350 35 -- 15 |
| 6th Run |
| Web 350 35 4.0 -- |
| Head 350 35 1.0 30 |
| ______________________________________ |
| (Root gap = 17 mm) |
| TABLE 4 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Welding Speed |
| Welding Welding (cm/min) |
| Current Voltage Upward Horizontal |
| Position |
| (A) (V) Movement |
| Travel |
| ______________________________________ |
| Base |
| Root 520 50 -- 25 |
| Run |
| 2nd Run 450 42 -- 10 |
| 3rd to 420 40 -- 25 |
| 5th Run |
| Web 420 40 7.0 -- |
| Head 420 40 2.0 25 |
| ______________________________________ |
| (Root gap = 17 mm) |
| TABLE 5 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Welding Speed |
| Welding Welding (cm/min) |
| Current Voltage Upward Horizontal |
| Position |
| (A) (V) Movement |
| Travel |
| ______________________________________ |
| Base |
| Root 500 45 -- 30 |
| Run |
| 2nd Run 450 40 -- 12 |
| 3rd Run further welding impossible |
| Web -- |
| Head -- |
| ______________________________________ |
| (Root gap = 17 mm) |
| TABLE 6 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Welding Speed |
| Welding Welding (cm/min) |
| Current Voltage Upward Horizontal |
| Position |
| (A) (V) Movement |
| Travel |
| ______________________________________ |
| Base |
| Root 450 47 -- 30 |
| Run |
| 2nd Run 400 40 -- 20 |
| 3rd Run further welding impossible |
| Web -- |
| Head -- |
| ______________________________________ |
| (Root gap = 17 mm) |
As described hereinabove, the present invention realized an automatic fusion welding of rails, particularly in field welding, at a high efficiency through a combination of submerged arc welding and electroslag welding for welding the rail base through the rail head without a complicated shift in the welding transformer operation and without changing the welding materials.
Kimura, Akira, Kashiwabara, Hiroshi, Fujiyama, Hirohisa
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10207359, | Apr 21 2014 | Edison Welding Institute, Inc | Thermite welding |
| 10286460, | Apr 07 2017 | Single-pass, single-radial layer, circumferential-progression fill-welding system, apparatus and method for refurbishing railway and other transit rails | |
| 11802379, | Mar 12 2019 | Self guarded frog copper weld fixture | |
| 5175405, | Apr 17 1990 | Nippon Steel Corporation | Method of automatically welding rails |
| 5773779, | Feb 21 1997 | Lincoln Global, Inc | Method and system for welding railroad rails |
| 5877468, | Feb 21 1997 | Lincoln Global, Inc | Method and system for welding railroad rails |
| 6069333, | Feb 21 1997 | Lincoln Global, Inc | Method and system for welding railroad rails |
| 6152349, | Jan 05 1996 | Railtech International | Welding mold and preheating device intended to cooperate with the welding mold |
| 6166347, | Jul 16 1999 | Lincoln Global, Inc. | Method and system for welding steel rails |
| 6207920, | Feb 21 1997 | Lincoln Global, Inc. | Method and system for welding railroad rails |
| 6288356, | Jan 10 2000 | Dane Systems, Inc.; DANE SYSTEMS, INC | Apparatus for making welds through partitions in battery cases |
| 6297472, | Apr 10 1998 | ESKANDARI, AMIR | Welding system and method |
| 6407364, | Jul 19 1999 | Lincoln Global, Inc. | Method and system for welding railroad rails |
| 8058583, | Jul 16 2003 | Apparatus and method for electroslag welding of rails | |
| 8656984, | Nov 20 2007 | Railtech International | Mold for direct-cast aluminothermic welding |
| 8658935, | Dec 24 2008 | Chemetron-Railway Products, Inc. | Welding process with jerk compensation |
| 9050682, | Nov 16 2010 | Electroslag welding with alternating electrode weld parameters | |
| 9470575, | Jan 03 2011 | ESKANDARI, AMIR | Water-cooled copper shoes |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4413169, | Jan 23 1981 | QUEENS UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON, A NON-PROFIT PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION, | Electro-slag welding process for irregular sections |
| 4575606, | Jun 25 1981 | Method of electroslag welding and flux | |
| JP4424249, | |||
| JP4512648, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Feb 12 1988 | KIMURA, AKIRA | Nippon Steel Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004841 | /0047 | |
| Feb 12 1988 | KASHIWABARA, HIROSHI | Nippon Steel Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004841 | /0047 | |
| Feb 12 1988 | FUJIYAMA, HIROHISA | Nippon Steel Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004841 | /0047 | |
| Feb 23 1988 | Nippon Steel Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Sep 16 1992 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Sep 24 1992 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Sep 26 1996 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Jan 09 2001 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Jun 17 2001 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Jun 20 1992 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Dec 20 1992 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jun 20 1993 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Jun 20 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Jun 20 1996 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Dec 20 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jun 20 1997 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Jun 20 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Jun 20 2000 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Dec 20 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jun 20 2001 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Jun 20 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |