A warewashing detergent composition with an improved builder system having zero phosphate that conditions service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions in solution and by preventing precipitation of the hardness ions beyond their stoichiometric concentration. The composition comprises a source of alkalinity, a water-conditioning vinyl polymer with pendant --CO2 H groups, a soil-dispersing phosphinopolycarboxylic acid, and a water-conditioning organic phosphonate.
|
1. A builder system for machine warewashing that conditions service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions in solution and by preventing precipitation of the hardness ions beyond their stoichiometric concentration, comprising:
(a) an effective amount of a polymer water-conditioning agent comprising a vinyl polymer with pendant --CO2 H groups having a molecular weight of 500-15,000; (b) an effective amount of a polymer soil-dispersing agent comprising a phosphinopolycarboxylic acid; and (c) an effective amount of a monomer threshold agent comprising a water-conditioning organic phosphonate.
8. A builder system for machine warewashing that conditions service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions in solution and by preventing precipitation of the hardness ions beyond their stoichiometric concentration, comprising:
(a) about 2-9% of an acrylic polymer comprising polyacrylic acid, the partial sodium salt of polyacrylic acid or sodium polyacrylate having a molecular weight of about 1,000-6,000; (b) about 0.7-3% of a phosphinopolycarboxylic acid having a molecular weight of about 250-3,000; and (c) about 0.9-4% of an organic phosphonate comprising 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid.
10. A warewashing detergent composition that conditions service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions in solution and by preventing precipitation of the hardness ions beyond their stoichiometric concentration, comprising:
(a) about 5-75% of a source-of alkalinity; (b) about 1-40% of a water-conditioning agent comprising a vinyl polymer with pendant-CO2 H groups, having a molecular weight of about 500-15,000; (c) about 0.3-14% of a polymer soil-dispersing agent comprising a phosphinopolycarboxylic acid having a molecular weight of about 200-5,000; and (d) about 0.5-18% of a monomer threshold agent comprising a water-conditioning organic phosphonate.
25. A warewashing detergent composition having a zero phosphate content that conditions service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions in solution and by preventing precipitation of the hardness ions beyond their stoichiometric concentration, comprising:
(a) about 20-60% of an alkali metal hydroxide comprising sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, or mixtures thereof; (b) about 2-9% of an acrylic polymer comprising polyacrylic acid, the partial sodium salt of polyacrylic acid or sodium polyacrylate having a molecular weight of about 1,000-6,000; (c) about 0.7-3% of a phosphinopolycarboxylic acid having a molecular weight of about 250-3000; and (d) about 0.9-4% of an organic phosphonate comprising 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid.
26. A warewashing process for cleaning a soiled surface using a detergent composition that conditions service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions in solution and by preventing precipitation of the hardness ions beyond their stoichiometric concentration, comprising:
(a) dissolving in water an effective amount of said detergent composition, thereby forming an aqueous wash solution, said detergent composition comprising: (1) about 5-75% of a source of alkalinity; (2) about 1-40% of a water-conditioning vinyl polymer with pendant --CO2 H groups having a molecular weight of about 500-15,000; (3) about 0.3-14% of a phosphinopolycarboxylic soil dispersing agent and having a molecular weight of about 200-5,000; and (4) about 0.5-18% of a water-conditioning organic phosphonate monomer; and (b) contacting said aqueous wash solution of (a) with said soiled surface for a period of time effective to clean said soiled surface.
2. The builder system of
3. The builder system of
4. The builder system of
5. The builder system of
6. The builder system of
9. The builder system of
11. The detergent composition of
12. The detergent composition of
13. The detergent composition of
14. The detergent composition of
15. The detergent composition of
16. The detergent composition of
17. The detergent composition of
18. The detergent composition of
19. The detergent composition of
21. The detergent composition of
(a) about 5-75% of distilled water; and (b) about 1-5% of a nonionic surfactant.
22. The detergent composition of
23. The detergent composition of
24. The detergent composition of
27. The process of
29. The process of
30. The process of
32. The process of
33. The process of
34. The process of
35. The process of
36. The process of
38. The process of
39. The process of
(a) about 5-75% of distilled water; and (b) about 1-5% of a nonionic surfactant
40. The process of
41. The process of
42. The process of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The invention pertains to a machine warewashing detergent composition, having a zero phosphate content, that contains an improved builder system. More specifically, the builder system of the warewashing detergent can treat divalent or trivalent hardness ions in service water and can, at the same time, prevent precipitation of the hardness ions beyond a stoichiometric concentration with respect to the builder system by a threshold effect.
In recent years, much attention has been given to the components of warewashing detergents that treat and reduce the harmful effects of water hardness. Hardness ions are typically undesirable in conjunction with warewashing detergents since they interfere with the soil removal mechanism. Hardness ions typically comprise metal ions such as calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, and other typically divalent or trivalent metal cations depending on the source of service water used in the warewashing environment.
Machine warewashing detergents are commonly highly alkaline, often providing wash water with a pH of 10.0 to 11.5, and are usually formulated by mixing or otherwise combining a variety of known organic and inorganic ingredients, such as alkaline detergent salts and alkaline condensed phosphates. Halogen-releasing agents also can be used in formulating warewashing detergents to provide stain removal and sanitization.
Condensed phosphates, such as sodium tripolyphosphate, have been used in the past as builders because of their detergency benefits and because of their water-treating properties. These benefits include soil dispersion, the sequestration of calcium, magnesium and other hardness ions, prevention of precipitation of calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide through a threshold effect, and chlorine stability. However, phosphates have been identified as contributing to water eutrophication, a process of excess algae growth in natural water. Many state governments have found it desirable to cause detergent makers to replace phosphates, particularly sodium tripolyphosphate, in warewashing and other detergents.
A significant problem has arisen in the search for a builder or builder system that is not a source of phosphate but provides all the detergency and water-treatment benefits of sodium tripolyphosphate. Many builders and combinations of builders have been evaluated in the past, but none have found commercial success in the warewash market. This is largely a result of the failure of these builders to provide one or more of the benefits of sodium tripolyphosphate.
It is recognized in the art that a threshold effect is desirable for use in a warewash machine. See U.S. Pat. No. 3,899,436. The threshold effect prevents precipitation of hard water metal ions at a concentration of ion in excess of the stoichiometric concentration of the sequestering agent. This is one reason why straight sequestering builders, such as ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) or zeolites, have not found commercial success. Detergents based on sodium tripolyphosphate sequester and rely on the threshold effect.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,676 discloses a liquid cleaning composition having a low phosphate content comprising an alkali metal hydroxide, a source of active chlorine, a water conditioning acrylic polymer, and a phosphinopolycarboxylic acid. The composition is particularly useful in cleaned-in-place equipment employed in the food processing industry.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,680,124 discloses a method of preventing the formation of calcium polyacrylate scale on industrial heat transfer surfaces such as boilers. The boiler water is treated with a water soluble phosphonate such as 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid. The warewashing environment of the present invention has a much higher pH than the boiler environment so scale is more difficult to control.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,539,144 discloses a machine dishwashing composition having a very low or zero phosphate content comprising an alkaline detergent material, a nonionic detergent surfactant, a water soluble calcium sequestering agent, and a hydrolyzed polymaleic anhydride.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,127,496 discloses a non-phosphate dishwasher detergent composition comprising an organic non-phosphate sequestering agent such as ethylenediamine tetraacetate or nitrilotriacetate, a nonionic detergent, a dry water-soluble anti-spotting agent, and non-phosphate alkaline and neutral builder salts.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,563,284, U.S. Pat. No. 4,581,145, U.K. Patent Application GB No. 2,137,185A, and Canadian Patent No. 1,117,395, all teach non-warewashing processes using a combination of monomer threshold agents and polymer dispersing agents to prevent calcium precipitation of the individual ingredients. While these systems obtain some value in either sequestration scale prevention or threshold performance, none provide the spectrum of properties needed in the replacement of condensed phosphates in machine warewashing.
A substantial need exists to provide a builder system for a warewashing detergent without intentionally added phosphate or polyphosphate that has all the detergency benefits of sodium tripolyphosphate or other condensed phosphate without its associated environmental harm.
The invention is an improved warewashing detergent having a zero phosphate content that contains an improved builder system. The builder system acts as a water softening agent for service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions in solution and by preventing precipitation of the hardness ions beyond their stoichiometric concentration with respect to the builder system by a threshold effect. The builder system also acts as a soil-dispersing agent.
The builder system comprises blended polymers comprising a vinyl polymer having pendant carboxyl groups and a water soluble phosphinopolycarboxylic acid polymer, combined with a monomeric organic phosphonate threshold agent. The builder system is combined with a source of alkalinity to form the warewashing detergent composition. These phosphorous-containing polymers are not believed to be a source of phosphate or condensed phosphate to service waters. We have found that the builder system of the invention is a water conditioner in a warewashing environment and also provides the detergency benefits of sodium tripolyphosphate.
The invention resides in an improved warewashing detergent composition having a zero phosphate content that contains an improved builder system. The halogen-stable builder system acts as a water-conditioning and soil-dispersing agent. The builder system has the ability to soften service water by holding or suspending divalent or trivalent hardness ions, such as calcium and magnesium ions, in solution. A threshold mechanism is used by the builder system to prevent precipitation of hardness ions beyond a stoichiometric concentration. The builder system comprises polymer water-conditioning and soil-dispersing components, and a monomer threshold component.
The polymer water-conditioning component is an effective amount of a water-soluble vinyl polymer having pendant carboxyl groups, which can act to condition wash solutions under end-use conditions. This polymer is a polymeric material having an average molecular weight of between about 500 and about 15,000 and having in its molecular structure the group derived from an alpha beta unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acid or anhydride: ##STR1## optionally together with the group derived from a comonomer: ##STR2## in which R1 is hydrogen, or a hydroxyl group; R2 is hydrogen, an alkyl or alkoxy group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, or a carboxylic acid group; R3 is hydrogen or an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms; and R4 is a hydroxyl group, an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms; an alkoxy group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an aldehyde group, or a carboxylic acid group. A preferred polymer in this group is a hydrolyzed polymaleic anhydride.
Another polymer that can be used in the invention is a water-soluble acrylic polymer. Such polymers include polyacrylic acid, polymethacrylic acid, acrylic acidmethacrylic acid copolymers, hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, hydrolyzed polymethacrylamide, hydrolyzed acrylamidemethacrylamide copolymers, hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile, hydrolyzed polymethacrylonitrile, hydrolyzed acrylonitrile methacrylonitrile copolymers, or mixtures thereof. Water-soluble salts or partial salts of these polymers, such as the respective alkali metal (e.g., sodium, potassium) or ammonium salts can also be used. The weight average molecular weight of the polymers is from about 500 to about 15,000 and is preferably within the range of from about 750 to about 10,000. Preferred polymers include polyacrylic acid, the partial sodium salt of polyacrylic acid or sodium polyacrylate having molecular weights of about 1,000 to about 6,000. These polymers are commercially available and methods for their preparation are well-known in the art.
For example, commercially-available water-conditioning polyacrylate solutions useful in the present invention include the sodium polyacrylate solution, Colloid® 207 (Colloids, Inc., Newark, N. J.); the polyacrylate acid solution, Aquatreat® AR-602-A (Alco Chemical Corp., Chattanooga, Tenn.); the polyacrylic acid solutions (50-65% solids) and the sodium polyacrylate powders (M. W. 2,100 and 6,000); and solutions (45% solids) available as the Goodright® K-700 series from B. F. Goodrich Co.; and the sodium or partial sodium salts of polyacrylic acid solutions (M. W. 1000-4,500), available as the ACRYSOL® series from Rohm and Haas. A specifically preferred polyacrylate useful in the invention is under the trade name ACRYSOL LMW-45, having a molecular weight of about 4,500.
The soil-dispersing component comprises an effective amount of a water-soluble phosphinopolycarboxylic acid polymer having a molecular weight of about 200-5,000, and is preferably within the range of from about 250-3,000. This component, which may also be referred to as a "phosphinoacrylic polymer," is formally the condensation product of low molecular weight, unsaturated monomers, such as those used to form the acrylic polymers described above, with sodium hypophosphite.
For example, acrylic acid-based polymers have the general formula: ##STR3## wherein the molecular weight and ratio of propionic acid units to the: ##STR4## unit may be varied over a wide range. For example, n plus m may vary from about 3-4 to about 70-75. Commercially-available phosphinopolycarboxylic acids having weight ratios of total polyacrylic acid to phosphinoxy of from about 33:1 to 35:1 and molecular weights of about 200-5,000, preferably about 250-3,000, are useful in the invention.
An especially preferred material is the phosphinopolycarboxylic acid available as BELSPERSE® 161 from Ciba-Geigy as a 46-52% aqueous solution (M. W. about 1,200). The BELSPERSE® 161 acts as a soil-dispersing agent as pointed out in U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,676. Phosphinopolycarboxylic acid is also chlorine stable, alkali stable, and hydrolytically stable.
The monomer threshold component of the invention can comprise any water-conditioning organic phosphonate. The organo-phosphonic acid compounds are those having a carbon-to-phosphorus bond as shown in the following general formula: ##STR5## Compounds within the scope of the above description generally are included in one of at least two categories expressed by the following general formulas: ##STR6## wherein R is a lower alkyl having from about 1 to 6 carbon atoms, e.g., methyl, ethyl, butyl, propyl, isopropyl, pentyl, isopentyl, and hexyl; substituted lower alkyl of from 1 to 6 carbon atoms, e.g., hydroxyl and amino-substituted alkyls; a mononuclear aromatic (aryl) radical, e.g., phenyl, benzene, etc., or a substituted mononuclear aromatic compound, e.g., hydroxyl, amino, lower alkyl-substituted aromatic, e.g., benzyl phosphonic acid; and M is a water-soluble cation, e.g., sodium, potassium, ammonium, lithium, etc., or hydrogen. Specific examples of compounds encompassed by the above formula include: methylphosphonic acid, ethylphosphonic acid, 2-hydroxyethylphosphonic acid, 2-amino-ethylphosphonic acid, isopropylphosphonic acid, benzene phosphonic acid, benzyl phosphonic acid, and 2-phosphono-butane-tricarboxylic acid-1,2,4.
Another general formula for organic phosphonate is: ##STR7## wherein R is an alkylene having from about 1 to about 12 carbon atoms or a substituted alkylene having from about 1 to about 12 carbon atoms, e.g., hydroxyl, amino, etc., substituted alkylenes, and M is the same as defined above. Specific examples of compounds encompassed by this formula include methylene diphosphonic acid, ethylidene diphosphonic acid, isopropylidene diphosphonic acid, 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid, hexamethylene diphosphonic acid, trimethylene diphosphonic acid, decamethylene diphosphonic acid, 1-hydroxy propylidene diphosphonic acid, 1,6-dihydroxy, 1,6-dimethyl, hexamethylene diphosphonic acid, dihydroxy, diethyl ethylene diphosphonic acid.
Another general formula for organic phosphonate useful in the present invention is: ##STR8## wherein R2 is a lower alkylene having from about 1 to about carbon atoms, or an amine or hydroxy-substituted lower alkylene; R3 is [R2 -PO3 M2 ]H, OH, amino, substituted amino, an alkyl having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a substituted alkyl of from 1 to 6 carbon atoms (e.g., OH, NH2 substituted) a mononuclear aromatic radical and a substituted mononuclear aromatic radical (e.g., OH, NH2 substituted); R4 is R3 or the group represented by the formula: ##STR9## wherein R5 and R6 are each hydrogen, lower alkyl of from about 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a substituted lower alkyl (e.g., OH, NH2 substituted), hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino group, substituted amino group, a mononuclear aromatic radical (e.g., OH and amine substituted); R7 is R5, R6, or the group R2 --PO3 M2 (R2 is as defined above); n is a number of from 1 through about 15; y is a number of from about 1 through about 14; and M is as earlier defined.
Specific examples of compounds encompassed by this formula include: Amino tri (methylene phosphonic acid), ethylene diamine tetra (methylene phosphonic acid), hexamethylene diamine tetra (methylene phosphonic acid), diethylene triamine penta (methylene phosphonic acid), and ethanolamine N,N-di-(methylene phosphonic acid).
A specifically-preferred organic phosphonate is 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid. This is commercially available as Dequest 2010. This particular phosphonate acts primarily as a threshold agent toward calcium carbonate, but also prevents precipitation of calcium polyacrylate, and acts as a sequestering agent of calcium and magnesium ions. It is also hydrolytically and chlorine stable.
Therefore, the builder system of the present invention comprises about 1-40%, preferably about 2-9%, of a water-conditioning vinyl polymer, preferably an acrylic polymer, about 0.3-14%, preferably about 0.7-3%, of a water-soluble phosphinopolycarboxylic acid, and about 0.5-18%, preferably about 0.9-4%, of a water-conditioning organic phosphonate. The preferred embodiment of the invention is to use builder components in a weight ratio of about 0.5-3:1 acrylic polymer to organic phosphonate, and a ratio of about 0.1-1.5:1 phosphinopolycarboxylic acid to organic phosphonate. The most preferred builder components of the invention are sodium polyacrylate, phosphinopolycarboxylic acid, and 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid. This combination of builders has not been used before to provide all the detergency benefits of sodium tripolyphosphate without the accompanying environmental harms.
The builder system has the ability to hold or suspend hardness ions in solution, functioning as a water conditioner primarily by the threshold mechanism. This means that less than stoichiometric amounts of builder components are required to prevent precipitation of hardness ions beyond the microcrystal stage. We have found that the combination of phosphinopolycarboxylic acid, sodium polyacrylate, and organic phosphonate produces an improved threshold effect that prevents precipitation of magnesium hydroxide. Furthermore, the builder system is alkali, chlorine, and hydrolitically stable and does not revert to orthophosphate.
The above builder system is combined with a source of alkalinity and an effective amount of soft water to form a warewashing detergent composition, having water-softening and precipitation-preventing characteristics, but having a zero phosphate content. By the term "zero phosphate," we mean the absence of significant amounts of PO34 anion, or condensed phosphates thereof, which are intentionally added to the detergent composition of the invention. Minor concentrations of phosphate may be present as a result of impurity or other non-intentional addition. The warewashing invention can contain other phosphorous species.
The source of alkalinity is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal hydroxides, such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, or mixtures of each thereof. Alkali metal silicates, such as sodium metasilicate, may also be used. The preferred form, which is the most cost-effective, is commercially available sodium hydroxide, which can be obtained in aqueous solutions at a concentration of about 50 wt-% and in a variety of solid forms of varying particle sizes. The sodium hydroxide can be employed in either the liquid or solid form (powdered, beads, or pellets), or a mixture of both.
For some cleaning operations, it may be desirable to add minor but effective amounts of alkali-stable synthetic organic surfactants, which may be selected from any of the known surfactant classes, which are water-miscible and chemically-compatible. Preferred for use in the present invention are nonionic surfactants used as defoamers and emulsifiers for warewashing purposes. These are known to those skilled in the art.
The detergent composition of the invention can also contain a source of available chlorine which acts as a biocidal or destaining agent. Both organic and inorganic sources of available chlorine are useful, including alkali metal and alkaline earth metal hypochlorite, hypochlorite addition products, chloramines, chlorimines, chloramides, and chlorimides. Specific examples of compounds of this type include sodium hypochlorite, potassium hypochlorite, monobasic calcium hypochlorite, dibasic magnesium hypochlorite, chlorinated trisodium phosphate dodecahydrate, potassium dichloroisocyanurate, trichlorocyanuric acid, sodium dichloroisocyanurate dihydrate, 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin, N-chlorosulfamide, Chloramine T, Dichloramine T, Chloramine B, and Dichloramine B.
For use in cast solid, powder, or granulated form, the preferred source of available chlorine is sodium dichloroisocyanurate dihydrate, either encapsulated or as purchased.
For use in liquids, gels, or mulls, the preferred sources of available chlorine include sodium, potassium or lithium hypochlorite and mono- and dibasic calcium hypochlorite, for reasons of availability, stability, and highly effective disinfectant action. Other optional ingredients may also be added to the detergent composition such as a defoamer, dye, perfume, neutral salts to act as process aids, and thickeners.
The detergent composition of the invention may be made in any physical form, such as a cast solid, powder, granulates, an aqueous liquid, a gel, or a mull.
Thus, the warewashing detergent composition of the present invention comprises about 5-75%, preferably about 20-60%, of a source of alkalinity, about 1-40%, preferably about 2-9%, of a water-conditioning vinyl polymer with pendant --CO2 H groups, having a molecular weight of about 500-15,000, preferably about 1,000-6,000, about 0.3-14%, preferably about 0.7-3%, of phosphinopolycarboxylic acid having a molecular weight of 200-5,000, preferably about 250-3,000, and about 0.5-18%, preferably about 0.9-4% of an organic phosphonate.
A preferred source of alkalinity would be about 30-50% of sodium hydroxide beads and 10-30% of 50 wt-% aqueous sodium hydroxide. The preferred vinyl polymer is sodium polyacrylate, and the preferred organic phosphonate is 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid. The detergent composition further comprises about 5-75% of distilled water and about 1-5% of nonionic surfactant. About 5-20% of sodium chloride or sodium sulfate is in the composition when a solid detergent is desired. About 1-15% of an active chlorine source can be added to the composition to act as a destaining agent.
The present invention is particularly suited for use in machine warewashing. The service water in the machine dissolves the detergent composition to form an aqueous wash solution that is contacted with a soiled surface of a ware at a temperature of about 50-75°C for a period of time effective to clean the soiled surface.
The invention will be further described by reference to the following detailed examples and test results which includes a best mode.
The following detergent examples were prepared by mixing the ingredients in the order listed in Table I. When ingredients 5 and 7 are added, a considerable amount of heat of neutralization and dissolution is generated, so no additional heating is required. Upon cooling, the compositions solidify.
Examples I and II contain all three builder components. Examples III, IV, and V contain less than three components and Example VI is a phosphate-containing detergent.
| TABLE I |
| ______________________________________ |
| Example |
| (Final Wt.-% Active Ingredient) |
| INGREDIENT I II III IV V VI |
| ______________________________________ |
| 1. Soft Water 13.47 8.30 |
| 11.50 |
| 17.50 |
| 14.8 3.00 |
| 2. Sodium Poly- 9.00 11.65 |
| 15.50 |
| -- 11.65 |
| -- |
| acrylate (50%) |
| 3. Phosphino- 3.00 3.00 |
| -- -- 3.00 |
| -- |
| polycarboxylate |
| (Belsperse ®161) |
| 4. 1-hydroxy- 3.33 3.30 |
| 3.30 |
| 3.30 |
| -- -- |
| ethylidene-1,1- |
| diphosphonic acid |
| (Dequest 2010) |
| 5. NaOH 50% 20.00 17.35 |
| 16.50 |
| 20.00 |
| 17.35 |
| 20.10 |
| 6. Nonionic Sur- 1.20 1.20 |
| 1.20 |
| 1.20 |
| 1.20 |
| 1.20 |
| factant |
| 7. NaOH Bead 40.00 40.00 |
| 40.00 |
| 40.00 |
| 40.00 |
| 39.00 |
| 8. Sodium Sulfate |
| 10.00 -- -- -- 12.00 |
| -- |
| 9. Sodium Chloride |
| -- 7.50 |
| 12.00 |
| 18.00 |
| -- -- |
| 10. Solid Chlorine |
| -- 7.50 |
| -- -- -- -- |
| Source |
| 11. Sodium Tri- -- -- -- -- -- 30.90 |
| polyphosphate |
| 12. Phosphate ester |
| -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 |
| defoamer |
| 13. Polyacrylic -- -- -- -- -- 5.00 |
| acid (50%) |
| 14. Inert Material |
| -- -- -- -- -- 1.50 |
| ______________________________________ |
A water-conditioning test was carried out using different combinations of the builder components of the invention at various concentrations and at different pHs to determine their effectiveness at preventing crystal growth.
PAC A. SAMPLE PREPARATIONThe procedure is first to mix the following in the order listed to 100 ml of test solution in a stoppered test bottle.
1. Well water (about 98.0 ml).
2. Builders expressed in ppm of active.
3. Sodium carbonate expressed in ppm.
4. Adjust pH upward to either 10 5 or 11 5 with dilute sodium hydroxide solution.
The stoppered test bottle are placed into a water bath and held at 70°C for two hours.
At the end of the two hours, the test bottles are removed from the water bath and a portion immediately filtered through a 0.45 micron filter. The filtrate is evaluated for calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sodium (Na) using an Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma (ICAP) instrument.
An untreated well water blank is also subjected to ICAP to determine the initial concentration of calcium and magnesium. Results are expressed in ppm.
The results of the water-conditioning test are listed in Tables II-V.
| TABLE II |
| ______________________________________ |
| Detergent Use Conc. 1500 ppm; Init. pH = 10.5 |
| FILTRATE (0.45 u) |
| Car- |
| Deq. LMW Belsp. bon- pH After |
| Test 2010 45 161 ate Ca Mg Na 2 Hours |
| No. PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM @70°C |
| ______________________________________ |
| 57 30.0 -- -- 400 28.5 6.1 303 10.6 |
| 58 30.0 -- -- 400 28.7 5.8 313 10.7 |
| 59 -- 67.5 -- 400 17.9 19.2 290 10.7 |
| 60 -- 67.5 -- 400 56.7 20.3 331 9.7 |
| 61 -- -- 22.5 400 5.9 3.9 276 10.5 |
| 62 -- -- 22.5 400 6.6 4.8 245 10.5 |
| 63 30.0 67.5 -- 400 58.4 21.8 299 10.6 |
| 64 30.0 67.5 -- 400 59.6 22.0 297 10.65 |
| 65 30.0 -- 22.5 400 48.7 18.8 308 10.3 |
| 66 30.0 -- 22.5 400 29.4 8.2 263 10.45 |
| 67 -- 67.5 22.5 400 58.7 21.3 276 10.4 |
| 68 -- 67.5 22.5 400 58.3 22.2 263 10.5 |
| 69 30.0 67.5 22.5 400 58.3 21.2 297 10.55 |
| 70 30.0 67.5 22.5 400 58.6 22.1 275 10.5 |
| ______________________________________ |
| TABLE III |
| ______________________________________ |
| Detergent Use Conc. 1500 ppm; Init. pH = 11.5 |
| FILTRATE (0.45 u) |
| Car- |
| Deq. LMW Belsp. |
| bon- pH After |
| Test 2010 45 161 ate Ca Mg Na 2 Hours |
| No. PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM @70°C |
| ______________________________________ |
| 71 30.0 -- -- 400 26.0 3.1 342 11.15 |
| 72 30.0 -- -- 400 25.2 2.5 352 11.15 |
| 73 -- 67.5 -- 400 9.8 19.6 372 11.25 |
| 74 -- 67.5 -- 400 10.2 20.0 388 11.15 |
| 75 -- -- 22.5 400 2.4 2.1 345 11.2 |
| 76 -- -- 22.5 400 2.2 5.3 370 11.45 |
| 77 30.0 67.5 -- 400 30.2 3.1 322 11.25 |
| 78 30.0 67.5 -- 400 31.0 2.9 351 11.35 |
| 79 30.0 -- 22.5 400 24.3 2.2 363 11.3 |
| 80 30.0 -- 22.5 400 22.9 1.5 343 11.35 |
| 81 -- 67.5 22.5 400 12.4 19.5 356 11.4 |
| 82 -- 67.5 22.5 400 13.2 20.5 359 11.4 |
| 83 30.0 67.5 22.5 400 54.7 19.5 358 11.2 |
| 84 30.0 67.5 22.5 400 52.9 18.6 377 11.4 |
| Well Water Blank 61.8 22.4 3.5 |
| ______________________________________ |
| TABLE IV |
| ______________________________________ |
| Detergent Use Conc. 2000 ppm; Init. pH = 10.5 |
| FILTRATE (0.45 u) |
| Deq. LMW Belsp. Car- |
| Test 2010 45 161 bonate |
| Ca Mg Na |
| No. PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM |
| ______________________________________ |
| 85 40.0 -- -- 400 42.9 16.6 334 |
| 86 40.0 -- -- 400 28.3 10.8 304 |
| 87 -- 90.0 -- 400 62.1 21.5 347 |
| 88 -- 90.0 -- 400 62.7 20.3 277 |
| 89 -- -- 30.0 400 62.7 21.8 299 |
| 90 -- -- 30.0 400 27.8 17.6 249 |
| 91 40.0 90.0 -- 400 57.3 20.7 293 |
| 92 40.0 90.0 -- 400 57.2 20.6 286 |
| 93 40.0 -- 30.0 400 39.3 15.6 263 |
| 94 40.0 -- 30.0 400 39.6 15.1 257 |
| 95 -- 90.0 30.0 400 57.2 20.2 364 |
| 96 -- 90.0 30.0 400 58.1 20.2 258 |
| 97 40.0 90.0 30.0 400 57.7 20.6 290 |
| 98 40.0 90.0 30.0 400 58.3 20.9 285 |
| ______________________________________ |
| TABLE V |
| ______________________________________ |
| Detergent Use Conc. 2000 ppm; Init. pH = 11.5 |
| FILTRATE (0.45 u) |
| Deq. LMW Belsp. Car- |
| Test 2010 45 161 bonate |
| Ca Mg Na |
| No. PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM |
| ______________________________________ |
| 99 40.0 -- -- 400 26.5 3.1 356 |
| 100 40.0 -- -- 400 26.9 3.1 361 |
| 101 -- 90.0 -- 400 12.1 19.4 372 |
| 102 -- 90.0 -- 400 13.0 19.3 355 |
| 103 -- -- 30.0 400 4.2 1.8 334 |
| 104 -- -- 30.0 400 3.8 1.5 352 |
| 105 40.0 90.0 -- 400 57.2 20.4 365 |
| 106 40.0 90.0 -- 400 56.5 20.2 413 |
| 107 40.0 -- 30.0 400 27.8 1.9 370 |
| 108 40.0 -- 30.0 400 27.3 2.4 356 |
| 109 -- 90.0 30.0 400 17.8 20.6 368 |
| 110 -- 90.0 30.0 400 15.8 20.6 380 |
| 111 40.0 90.0 30.0 400 57.2 20.5 386 |
| 112 40.0 90.0 30.0 400 57.0 20.5 429 |
| Well Water Blank 61.9 22.4 1 |
| ______________________________________ |
The experimental procedure involves filtration through a 0.45 micron filter. Thus, it is not known whether the calcium and magnesium that pass through the filter do so as the free ions or as small crystallites.
The results show that a combination of a monomer (Dequest 2010) and an acrylate polymer (LMW-45) do a reasonable job of conditioning water hardness. Runs 105 and 106 (Table V) have 57.2 and 56.5 ppm of calcium and 20.4 and 20.2 ppm of magnesium in the filtrate, versus 61.9 and 22.4 ppm of calcium and magnesium in the well water blank, respectively. Neither the monomer nor the acrylate polymer alone does as well as the combination according to this test procedure, as shown in runs 99-102. The combination of a monomer, acrylate polymer and phosphinopolycarboxylic acid (Belsperse® 161) also conditions water hardness as shown in runs 111 and 112. (See also runs 69 and 70 of Table II, runs 83 and 84 of Table III, and runs 97 and 98 of Table IV.)
The amount of hardness minerals in the well water is equivalent to 246.8 ppm. It is apparent to those skilled in the art that the total amount of builder is not sufficient to completely sequester the hardness, so some of the conditioning is due to the threshold mechanism.
Although this data shows that combinations of builders condition water hardness, it does not necessarily mean that a good dishwashing result can be predicted. For example, those skilled in the art know that EDTA completely sequesters water hardness, but it has not found commercial success.
A test to determine whether water hardness minerals will deposit onto a warewash machine or onto tableware is the Machine Liming test.
The Machine Liming Test is useful because it demonstrates whether the conditioned water hardness has any tendency to adhere to the machine or to tableware. It does not matter if the water-hardness minerals are kept in solution as ions or agglomerate to small crystallites, as long as the builder system prevents the minerals from depositing.
PAC A. PREPARATION AND PROCEDUREThe machine used for the test is a Hobart C-44 single-rack conveyor machine. It is fitted with a detergent-dispensing system that maintains 2000 ppm detergent. Hot well water (15 grains per gallon hardness) is fed continuously into the machine at a rate of 7.5 liters per minute. In addition, beef stew/tomato sauce puree is fed into the wash tank at a rate of 8 ml per minute. The wash tank temperature is maintained at 155°-160° F. The test is carried out for two hours. At the end of the test, the interior of the machine is observed for evidence of film or deposit on the heater coils and all other parts. Results are graded as shown in Table VI.
| TABLE VI |
| ______________________________________ |
| MACHINE LIMING TEST GRADING SCALE |
| Grade Condition |
| ______________________________________ |
| 0.0 No lime or film on heater coils |
| or machine parts. |
| 1.0 Small amount of lime film on |
| heater coils, none elsewhere. |
| 2.0 Slight film on machine interior |
| and heater coils. |
| 3.0 Film on machine interior and |
| build-up on heater coils. |
| 4.0 Build-up on both machine interior |
| and heater coils. |
| 5.0 Heavy precipitate on machine |
| interior and heater coils. |
| ______________________________________ |
The Machine Limiting Test was performed on Examples I-VI of Table I, and the results are listed in Table VII.
| TABLE VII |
| ______________________________________ |
| MACHINE LIMING RESULTS |
| Example |
| Grade |
| ______________________________________ |
| I 1.0 |
| II 1.0 |
| III 2.0 |
| IV 3.5 |
| V 5.0 |
| VI 3.0 |
| ______________________________________ |
Table VII shows that the instant invention outperforms conventional phosphated dishwash detergent. When the phosphonate (Dequest 2010) was not used in the detergent formulation (Example V), a heavy calcium polyacrylate precipitate was formed during the liming test. As can be seen from the above table, the formula that worked the best included all three of the builder components of the present invention.
The detergent composition of Example II was also tested and evaluated in the field with institutional warewashers using local city water. Good results were achieved when 2,000 ppm of detergent was used in the warewasher.
While the invention has been described and fully explained in the detailed description of the specification and preferred embodiments, many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Lentsch, Steven E., Oakes, Thomas R.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10358622, | Sep 13 2012 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Two step method of cleaning, sanitizing, and rinsing a surface |
| 11865219, | Apr 15 2013 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Peroxycarboxylic acid based sanitizing rinse additives for use in ware washing |
| 5292446, | Nov 14 1990 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Nonphosphated automatic dishwashing compositions with oxygen bleach systems and process for their preparation |
| 5336430, | Nov 03 1992 | Lever Brothers Company, Division of Conopco, Inc.; LEVER BROTHERS COMPANY DIVISION OF CONOPCO, INC | Liquid detergent composition containing biodegradable structurant |
| 5340501, | Nov 01 1990 | Ecolab USA Inc | Solid highly chelated warewashing detergent composition containing alkaline detersives and Aminocarboxylic acid sequestrants |
| 5358653, | Jun 25 1990 | Ecolab USA Inc | Chlorinated solid rinse aid |
| 5712244, | Dec 23 1993 | Proctor & Gamble Company | Rinse aid compositions comprising non-nitrogen-containing organs diphosphonic acid, salt or complex thereof |
| 5876514, | Jan 23 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Warewashing system containing nonionic surfactant that performs both a cleaning and sheeting function and a method of warewashing |
| 5929018, | Mar 11 1995 | Procter & Gamble Co. | Detergent composition comprising a polymeric polycarboxylic compound, a chelant, and an amylase enzyme |
| 6136916, | Aug 06 1992 | Rohm and Haas Company | Curable aqueous composition |
| 6156715, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block metal protecting warewashing detergent composition |
| 6177392, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block detergent composition |
| 6194371, | May 01 1998 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable alkaline emulsion cleaners |
| 6268324, | Jun 01 1993 | Ecolab Inc. | Thickened hard surface cleaner |
| 6365568, | Jan 29 1991 | Ecolab Inc. | Process for manufacturing solid cast silicate-based detergent compositions and resultant product |
| 6410495, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block metal protecting warewashing detergent composition |
| 6436893, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Alkaline detergent containing mixed organic and inorganic sequestrants resulting in improved soil removal |
| 6503879, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Alkaline detergent containing mixed organic and inorganic sequestrants resulting in improved soil removal |
| 6583094, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block detergent composition |
| 6630434, | Jun 01 1993 | Ecolab Inc. | Thickened hard surface cleaner |
| 6632291, | Mar 23 2001 | Ecolab USA Inc | Methods and compositions for cleaning, rinsing, and antimicrobial treatment of medical equipment |
| 6638902, | Feb 01 2001 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid enzyme compositions and methods employing them |
| 6653266, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Binding agent for solid block functional material |
| 6660707, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block metal protecting warewashing detergent composition |
| 6831054, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block detergent composition |
| 6835706, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Alkaline detergent containing mixed organic and inorganic sequestrants resulting in improved soil removal |
| 7087569, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block metal protecting warewashing detergent composition |
| 7094746, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Stable solid block detergent composition |
| 7243664, | Mar 04 2005 | Procter & Gamble Company, The | Automatic dishwashing composition with corrosion inhibitors |
| 7341987, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Binding agent for solid block functional material |
| 7517846, | May 14 1991 | NALCO HOLDING COMPANY | Solid, two part chemical concentrate |
| 8063010, | Aug 02 2004 | Ecolab USA Inc | Solid detergent composition and methods for manufacturing and using |
| 8389463, | Nov 09 2009 | Ecolab USA Inc | Enhanced dispensing of solid compositions |
| 8802611, | May 03 2010 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Highly concentrated caustic block for ware washing |
| 8858650, | Dec 27 2007 | Sunburst Chemicals, Inc. | Bleaching methods with peroxy compounds |
| 8883035, | Jul 27 2009 | Ecolab USA Inc.; Ecolab USA Inc | Formulation of a ware washing solid controlling hardness |
| 8906839, | Jan 13 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Alkaline detergent containing mixing organic and inorganic sequestrants resulting in improved soil removal |
| 9752105, | Sep 13 2012 | Ecolab USA Inc.; Ecolab USA Inc | Two step method of cleaning, sanitizing, and rinsing a surface |
| 9845448, | Jul 27 2009 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Formulation of a ware washing solid controlling hardness |
| RE38262, | Jan 23 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Warewashing system containing nonionic surfactant that performs both a cleaning and sheeting function and a method of warewashing |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3297578, | |||
| 3890228, | |||
| 3899436, | |||
| 3959167, | Dec 10 1973 | W R GRACE & CO -CONN | Method and composition of inhibiting scale |
| 4127483, | Jun 11 1974 | FMC CORPORATION UK LIMITED | Treatment of aqueous systems |
| 4127496, | Dec 04 1972 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | Non-phosphate automatic dishwasher detergent |
| 4163732, | Dec 06 1976 | Kao Soap Co., Ltd. | Detergent composition containing water-insoluble phosphorus-containing aluminosilicate builders |
| 4187190, | Nov 01 1976 | DeSoto, Inc. | Low phosphate content dishwashing detergent |
| 4233172, | Nov 01 1976 | DeSoto, Inc. | Low phosphate content dishwashing detergent |
| 4372870, | Jul 24 1981 | Betz Laboratories, Inc. | Method and composition for treating aqueous mediums |
| 4539144, | Dec 23 1981 | LEVER BROTHERS COMPANY, A CORP OF ME | Dishwashing compositions with an anti-filming polymer |
| 4556493, | Feb 16 1983 | W R GRACE & CO -CONN | Composition and method for inhibiting scale |
| 4563284, | Aug 06 1984 | The B. F. Goodrich Company | Inhibition of salt precipitation in aqueous systems |
| 4576722, | Feb 14 1980 | Ecolab USA Inc | Scale and sludge compositions for aqueous systems |
| 4579676, | Dec 17 1984 | Economics Laboratory, Inc. | Low-phosphate liquid cleaning composition |
| 4581145, | Sep 27 1982 | BETZDEARBORN INC | Composition and method for inhibiting scale |
| 4608188, | Apr 12 1985 | BASF Corporation | Dishwashing composition |
| 4631131, | Dec 08 1983 | W R GRACE & CO -CONN | Method for inhibiting scale |
| 4652377, | Aug 20 1985 | NOVEON IP HOLDINGS CORP | Inhibition of alkaline earth sulfate scales |
| 4680124, | Jan 08 1987 | Nalco Chemical Company; NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, A DE CORP | Polyacrylate scale inhibition |
| CA1117395, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jul 08 1988 | LENTSCH, STEVEN E | Ecolab Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004907 | /0521 | |
| Jul 08 1988 | OAKES, THOMAS R | Ecolab Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004907 | /0521 | |
| Jul 11 1988 | Ecolab Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Jan 01 2009 | ECOLAB, INC | Ecolab USA Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 057434 | /0601 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Dec 03 1992 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Jan 04 1993 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Feb 18 1997 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Jul 13 1997 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Jul 11 1992 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Jan 11 1993 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jul 11 1993 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Jul 11 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Jul 11 1996 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Jan 11 1997 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jul 11 1997 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Jul 11 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Jul 11 2000 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Jan 11 2001 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jul 11 2001 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Jul 11 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |