A spray guard adapted for use with a wand for spraying a liquid onto vegetation, the wand having a cylindrically shaped discharge tube and a nozzle tip attached to the end of the discharge tube. The spray guard includes a dome having an open end and provided with an aperture through which the discharge tube may selectively extend. The dome channels, directs, and forcuses the spray emitted from the nozzle tip toward a relatively localized area.
|
6. A spray guard adapted for use with a wand for spraying a liquid onto vegetation, the wand having a substantially cylindrical shaped discharge tube and a nozzle tip attached to an end of the discharge tube such that the liquid may flow through the discharge tube, through the nozzle tip, and onto the vegetation, said spray guard comprising:
a dome having an open end and provided with an aperture, said dome being fashioned of a rigid, inflexible material surrounding the aperture such that the size of the aperture is constant, the size of the aperture being large enough to permit both the nozzle tip and the discharge tube to be inserted and extended therethrough; and means for selectively preventing the nozzle tip from being retracted back through the aperture after the nozzle tip has been inserted through the aperture and for permitting the discharge tube to freely translate through the aperture when the nozzle tip is prevented by said preventing means from being retracted back through the aperture.
1. A spray guard adapted for use with a wand for spraying a liquid onto vegetation, the wand having a substantially cylindrically shaped discharge tube and a nozzle tip adapted to be selectively releasably attached to an end of the discharge tube such that the liquid may flow through the discharge tube, through the nozzle tip, and onto the vegetation, the nozzle tip having a width in a direction substantially orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the discharge tube that is greater than the width of the discharge tube in a direction substantially orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the discharge tube, said spray guard comprising:
a dome having an open end and provided with an aperture, said dome being fashioned of a rigid, inflexible material surrounding the aperture such that the size of the aperture is constant, the width of the aperture being larger than the discharge tube width and smaller than the nozzle tip width whereby the dome may be mounted on the discharge tube only by disattaching the nozzle tip from the discharge tube, inserting and extending the discharge tube through the aperture, and reattaching the nozzle tip to the discharge tube while the discharge tube is extended through the aperture, and whereby the discharge tube may freely translate through the aperture after the nozzle tip has been reattached.
2. A spray guard according to
3. A spray guard according to
4. A spray guard according to
5. A spray guard according to
7. A spray guard according to
8. A spray guard according to
9. A spray guard according to
10. A spray guard according to
11. A spray guard according to
12. A spray guard according to
13. A spray guard according to
14. A spray guard according to
15. A spray guard according to
16. A spray guard according to
17. A spray guard according to
|
The present invention relates to a spray guard adapted for use with a wand for spraying a liquid onto vegetation. Such wands normally include a cylindrically shaped discharge tube and a nozzle tip attached to the end of the discharge tube. The liquid flows from a container, through the discharge tube, through the nozzle tip, and onto the vegetation. A drawback of using such wands is that the liquid is sometimes wasted by being sprayed in directions other than onto the desired vegetation. For example, if one wishes to apply an insecticide onto vegetation, such wands waste insecticide by spraying the insecticide into the air, onto adjacent ground, onto adjacent vegetation, etc. Also, if the liquid is designed to kill the vegetation, such as a defoliant, then such wands also often result in the liquid being sprayed and carried by wind onto other nearby vegetation that one does not want killed. For example, if one desires to apply a defoliant to weeds, such wands often cause a defoliant to be sprayed onto nearby desirable vegetation such as flowers, vegetables, shrubs, etc. Consequently, there is a need to direct such sprays only onto the intended vegetation
The present invention relates to a spray guard adapted for use with a wand for spraying a liquid onto vegetation, the wand having a cylindrically shaped discharge tube and a nozzle tip attached to the end of the discharge tube. The spray guard includes a dome having an open end and provided with an aperture through which the discharge tube may selectively extend. The dome channels, directs, and focuses the spray emitted from the nozzle tip toward a relatively localized area.
The invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a side view of the spray guard in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a bottom view of the spray guard shown in FIG. 1; .
FIG. 3 is a side view of the spray guard shown in FIG. 1 mounted on a discharge tube; and
FIG. 4 is a side view of a spray guard in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention mounted on a discharge tube.
The present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to the same item.
There is shown in FIG. 1 a spray guard in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The spray guard comprises a dome 10 fashioned in the shape of a truncated pyramid. The dome 10 is preferably nine inches high, six inches square at the base, and three inches square at the upper end. The base end of the dome 10 is open, as best shown in FIG. 2. The upper end of the dome 10 is provided with a centrally disposed, circular aperture 12. The dome 10 may be fashioned of metal or other material, and is preferably fashioned of clear, rigid plastic having a thickness of three thirty-seconds of an inch. The transparency of the dome 10 permits the user to readily perceive the spraying operation and to determine whether the spray is being applied to the vegetation as desired. It should be appreciated that other dome structures may also be advantageously used in connection with the spray guard of the present invention.
As best shown in FIG. 3, the wand includes a cylindrically shaped discharge tube 14, which may be formed of a variety of different materials, and which may be either rigid or flexible. The wand shown in FIG. 3 includes a nozzle tip 16 releaseably attached, such as by screw threads, to the end of the discharge tube 14. As shown in FIG. 3, the circumference of the discharge tube 14 is smaller than the circumference of the nozzle tip 16, or stated differently, the width of the discharge tube 14 in a direction orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the discharge tube is shorter than the width of the nozzle tip -6 in a direction orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the discharge tube 14. In this embodiment of the present invention, the aperture 12 in the dome 10 possesses a diameter larger than the width of the discharge tube 14, and smaller than the width of the nozzle tip 16. The dome 10 may be mounted on the wand by disattaching the nozzle tip 16 from the discharge tube 14, inserting the discharge tube 14 through the aperture 12, and reattaching the nozzle tip 16. The dome 10 is thereby mounted on the discharge tube 14 and is adapted to freely translate relative to the discharge tube 14.
Because of the free translatability of the dome 1 relative to the discharge tube 14, the angle at which the spray emanates from the dome 10 may be selectively varied. As best shown in FIG. 3, the spray emanates from the nozzle 16 at a maximum angle 18. The number of degrees of the maximum angle 18 may be varied by translating the dome 10 relative to the discharge tube 14 in the direction of arrow 19. Thus, the angle 18 may be varied to provide a substantial range of different angles at which the spray is dispersed. If the spray is intended to be directed to a relatively small plant, then the dome 10 may be translated relative to the discharge tube 14 so that the angle 18 is relatively small, and contrastingly, if the spray is adapted to be directed to a relatively large shrub, then the dome 10 may be translated relative to the discharge tube 14 so that the angle 18 is relatively large. Such translation may be accomplished by manually grasping and moving the dome 10 to a selected position relative to the dome 10.
There is shown in FIG. 4 a dome 10 mounted on a discharge tube 14 to which a nozzle tip 16 is attached. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, the nozzle tip 16 may be fixedly attached to the discharge tube 14 or may be releaseably attached to the discharge tube 14 and smaller than the circumference of the discharge tube 14. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, the aperture 12 of the dome 10 is large enough so that both the nozzle tip 16 and the discharge tube 14 may be inserted through the aperture 12. In order to selectively prevent the nozzle tip 16 from totally withdrawing back through the aperture 12, a clamp 18 may be mounted on a discharge tube 14, adjacent to the nozzle tip 16. The clamp 18 may include a tightening screw 20 and one or more ears 22 extending radially outward from the discharge tube 14. The ears 22 are rigid and relatively rigidly clamped to the discharge tube 14 so as to prevent the nozzle tip 16 from being retracted through the aperture 12. The ears 22 may be replaced by a ring surrounding the periphery of the discharge tube 14. In order to disattach the dome 10 from the discharge tube 14, the clamp 18 is simply removed from the discharge tube 14. Since the dome 10 is freely translatable with respect to the discharge tube 14 in the embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 4, the angle of the spray emanating from the dome 10 may be varied in the same manner as previously described with reference to FIG. 3.
Although particular embodiments of the present invention have been described and illustrated herein, it should be recognized that modifications and variations may readily occur to those skilled in the art and that such modifications and variations may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of my invention. Consequently, my invention as claimed below may be practiced otherwise than a specified described above.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10478834, | Nov 28 2014 | Kao Corporation | Foam dispensing container |
11020755, | Nov 28 2014 | Kao Corporation | Foam dispensing container |
5139200, | Apr 16 1991 | Shield for agricultural sprayer | |
5255846, | Sep 21 1992 | Spray control apparatus for use with texturizer machines | |
5280856, | Aug 04 1992 | Debris shield apparatus | |
5360165, | Sep 28 1992 | Spray paint nozzle and nozzle shroud | |
5486067, | Dec 14 1993 | Pavement Marking Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for marking a surface |
5529432, | Dec 14 1993 | PRIMELINE PRODUCTS, INC , A FLORIDA CORPORATION | Apparatus and method for marking a surface |
5529433, | Dec 14 1993 | Pavement Marking Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for marking a surface |
5865379, | May 12 1997 | AGCO Corporation | Isolator for depending components on electrostatic field sprayer boom |
5884842, | Jan 07 1997 | Camco Manufacturing, Inc. | Tank cleaning tool |
6145756, | May 01 1999 | ROGERS, CYNTHIA L | Gardening applicator for delivering liquid chemicals to selected vegetation |
6220525, | Nov 17 1999 | Fire ant eradication apparatus | |
6443368, | May 10 1999 | ROGERS, CYNTHIA L | Gardening applicator for delivering liquid chemicals to selected vegetation |
6516819, | Mar 11 2000 | Blind hole flushing device | |
6637151, | Mar 01 2002 | Spray shield assembly | |
6679438, | Mar 13 2002 | Guard for spray applicator | |
7311823, | Sep 23 2004 | Pool filter cleaning device | |
7384005, | Feb 02 2005 | Camco Manufacturing, Inc. | Tank spray head assembly |
9038922, | Jul 27 2009 | Spray containment device and methods of use | |
9314804, | Apr 25 2012 | Spray shield and spray system including the same | |
9345296, | Sep 09 2015 | Walking aid with deterrent spray | |
D398704, | Sep 08 1997 | Garden spray shield | |
D701766, | Apr 24 2013 | Spray nozzle | |
D702124, | Apr 24 2013 | Rotatable spray shield device | |
D705652, | Apr 24 2013 | Spray shield device |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1219642, | |||
1760274, | |||
2566878, | |||
2807816, | |||
2893648, | |||
2928610, | |||
3092334, | |||
3118607, | |||
3405669, | |||
3672380, | |||
3770204, | |||
GB1513711, | |||
GB820944, | |||
WO8203799, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 11 1993 | M283: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Apr 22 1997 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 14 1997 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 12 1992 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 1993 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 1993 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 12 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 12 1996 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 1997 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 1997 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 12 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 12 2000 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 2001 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 2001 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 12 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |