Pressure gradient microphone comprising a membrane (2) and a back electrode (4), the latter being provided with a film (6) of an electret material divided into semicircular sections, one of them being provided with a permanent electrostatic charge. The back electrode is supplied with an inverse potential by means of an external, adjustable voltage source. As a result the pressure gradient microphone is able to subtract two almost equal values from each other so as to indicate the pressure difference and consequently the pressure gradient with greater accuracy than previously known.

Patent
   4887300
Priority
Jun 25 1987
Filed
Mar 07 1988
Issued
Dec 12 1989
Expiry
Jun 25 2007
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
23
8
all paid
1. Pressure gradient microphone comprising a membrane and a back electrode, the surface of either the membrane or the back electrode being a film of an electrostatically charged material divided into n sections, characterised by one or several of the sections being permanently charged, the back electrode being electrically charged by means of an adjustable external voltage source.
2. Pressure gradient microphone according to claim 1, characterised by the adjustment being performed by subjecting all the membrane to an equal sound pressure and subsequently adjusting to minimum output signal.
3. Pressure gradient microphone according to claim 1, characterised by the chamber of the microphone being so small that the deflection of the membrane is considerably reduced under equal pressure on the two halves.
4. Pressure gradient microphone according to claim 1, characterised by the permanent electrostatic charges being only supplied to one half of the sections.
5. Pressure gradient microphone according to claim 1, characterised by four electrode parts covered by an electret material and interconnected two by two for indicating the pressure gradient in one plane.
6. Pressure gradient microphone according to any one of the claims 1-4 or 5 characterised by opposing a pressure microphone, a relatively thin gap existing between the microphones.

The present invention relates to a pressure gradient microphone comprising a membrane and a back electrode the surface of either the membrane or the back electrode being a film of an electrostatically charged, electret material divided into preferably semicircular sections.

The U.S. Pat. No. 3,588,382 describes a pressure gradient microphone of the electret type with the electret being divided into semicircular sections, said sections being positively or negatively charged. It is difficult to manufacture good pressure gradient microphones according to this principle for measuring purposes. Such microphones are, apart from being sensitive to pressure gradients, also sensitive to pressure, i.e. to pressure equally distributed all over the membrane. The polarized sections divide the microphone into separate transducer sections, each section contributing to the signal of the microphone. Ideally, the contributions of the sections should neutralize each other with equal pressure all over the membrane whereby the microphone should transmit no signal. Due to different charges, unequal distances between the membrane and the charged sections, unequally distributed membrane voltages etc. between the components this can never be achieved in practice. That is why such pressure gradient microphones are not used for the acoustic measuring of particle speed and sound intensity, although it would be an advantage compared to the state of the art.

An electret microphone of the above type is according to the invention characterised by only some of the sections being permanently charged, the back electrode being electrically charged by means of an adjustable external voltage source.

In a pressure gradient microphone provided with a permanent charge as well as with a charge from an external voltage source, the pressure sensitivity can be adjusted to zero by adjusting the voltage source, while the membrane is supplied with equal pressure. The external voltage source is used for outbalancing the differences in all other important parameters. As a result the pressure sensitivity is reduced by a factor 10 or more compared to microphones with two permanent charges.

The electret microphone may be improved and become more easily adjustable, if the chamber of the microphone is so small that the deflection of the membrane is considerably reduced under equal pressure on the two halves.

In a preferred embodiment the electret microphone comprises four back electrode parts interconnected two by two for measuring the pressure gradient in one plane.

Measuring the pressure gradient is important because this parameter can be used for determining particle speed and sound intensity. Both values are of great interest in connection with acoustic measurements.

A pressure gradient microphone according to the present invention is on the outside formed like a typical microphone for measuring pressure. By placing such a pressure gradient microphone opposite a pressure microphone of the same outer size and form in such a way that their membranes are placed opposite to each other, an especially advantageous intensity measuring probe is obtained, since the pressure and particle speed can be determined within the same small area.

The invention will be described in greater details below with reference to the accompanying Figures, in which

FIG. 1 shows an electret microphone according to the invention for measuring pressure gradients,

FIG. 2 shows the electric circuit diagram to be used in connection with the pressure gradient microphone,

FIG. 3 shows a pressure gradient microphone in connection with a pressure microphone for measuring sound intensity, and

FIGS. 4a-4c show a pressure gradient microphone with its electric circuit diagram indicating the direction of propagation of the sound in one plane.

The microphone shown in FIG. 1 comprises an outer microphone housing 1 formed substantially like a cylindric component. The microphone housing 1 is provided with a membrane unit 2 including a short cylindrical sleeve with a flange stretching the membrane together with the microphone housing. The membrane 2 is the movable electrode of the microphone. The membrane unit 2 is screwed or in an other way fastened to the microphone housing 1 so as to establish an electrically conductive connection between the housing 1 and the membrane 2. The inside of the microphone housing is provided with a recess with a contact surface for a disc-shaped insulator 3. The insulator 3 is kept in its position in the microphone housing 1 by means of a spring washer at a thread on the inside of the housing.

A stationary electrode 4, referred to as back electrode, is situated on the insulator 3. This electrode includes a head with a plane surface being the actual stationary capacitor plate, and a cylindrical part extending through the insulator 3 and into a terminal of a electrically well-conducting material. The membrane unit 2, the microphone housing 1, the back electrode 4 and the insulator 3 thus enclose a chamber only communicating with the ambient through a pressure compensating channel 5. This channel can be established in several ways. In some microphones the pressure compensating channel is obtained by means of a bore in the wall of the microphone housing, and the necessary acoustic resistance is subsequently obtained by leading a wire of a suitable thickness through the channel.

The back electrode 4 is provided with a film 6 of electrostatically charged, electret material. The film optionally of a thickness of approx. 10-20 μm is divided into two semicircular sections 6a and 6b. Only one of the semicircular sections is electrostatically charged (e.g. negatively charged) to a potential of e.g. -250 V in proportion to the back electrode 4, cf. FIG. 2. The principle of the invention is that the back electrode is supplied with a potential of +125 V in proportion to the membrane 2. Thus one half of the film 6 has a potential of -125 V in relation to the membrane 2, while the other half of the film 6 has a potential of +125 V in relation to the membrane 2, and these potentials can be finely adjusted in order to equalize distortions by means of a potentiometer connected in parallel to an external voltage source. The adjustment is performed by subjecting all the membrane 2 to an equal pressure and then adjusting to minimum ouptput signal. This adjustment compensates for the lack of symmetry in the mechanical structure. It is easier to compensate for undesirable signals if the chamber of the microphone is so small that the deflection of the membrane is considerably reduced by an equal pressure on the two halves. As a result a pressure gradient microphone is able to subtract two almost equal measuring values from each other and thus indicate the pressure difference and consequently the pressure gradient with greater accuracy than previously known. The output signal is delivered by the back electrode at Vud.

The above pressure gradient microphone indicates a pressure gradient in one direction, i.e. along the surface of the membrane in a direction perpendicular to the dividing line between the two semicircular sections.

Another preferred embodiment is provided with e.g. four quadrant-shaped back electrode parts interconnected two by two for indicating the direction of propagation of the sound in one plane. FIG. 4a shows the separated microphone where the four electrode parts with coatings 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d of electret material are visible. Two of these coatings 8a, 8b are electrostatically charged (negatively). FIG. 4b shows, how the electrode parts 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d are interconnected two by two, the individual set of electrodes being adjusted by means of a separate potentiometer connected in parallel to a voltage source of 125 V. Furthermore FIG. 4b shows an XY coordinate system with an example of sound propagation in relation to this coordinate system. FIG. 4c illustrates how the direction of propagation of the sound is computed in relation to one axis of the coordinate system using the signal values measured at A and B. The advantage of this microphone is that turning the microphone for maximum sensitivity is avoided. By means of two microphone placed perpendicular to each other the direction of propagation in sapce can furthermore be indicated.

An electrostatic measuring grid divided into semicircular sections insulated from each other can be placed in front of the microphone for calibrating purposes, said sections corresponding to the divisions of the back electrode. By means of suitable differences in phase between the electric signals, the grid is used to electrically simulate a sound wave propagating across the pressure gradient microphone.

A pressure gradient microphone can advantageously be placed opposite a pressure microphone so as to provide a relatively thin gap between the microphones, cf. FIG. 3. As a result a sound intensity I dependant on the pressure P and the difference in pressure can be measured.

The sound intensity can be measured by means of:

(1) PRESSURE MICROPHONES

(2) A PRESSURE MICROPHONE and A PRESSURE GRADIENT MICROPHONE

The mean value in time of the sound intensity--in a point l and in a direction r--is defined by the pressure p(t) in the point and by the particle speed in the direction ur (t), such that

lr =p(t)·ur (t)

(the line indicating mean value in time)

The pressure microphones are a part of a sound intensity probe, said microphones being mounted at a predetermined intervals. During the intensity measurement the central point between the microphones is placed in the measuring point of the sound field.

By this method the pressure p(t) in the measuring point is represented by half the sum of the pressures measured by the microphones, i.e. by the expression: ##EQU1## This half sum is computed in the measuring apparatus.

The difference between the pressures in part of the expression shown below representing the particle speed ur (t) in the measuring point. The difference is computed in the measuring apparatus.

For the sound field the following applies:

p1 (t)-ps (t)=Δr·ρ·ar (t)

Δr<<wavelength/2)

Δr: point distance/microphone distance

ρ: density of air

ar (t): particle acceleration in the direction r

The particle speed is represented by ##EQU2## Δr0 : value for distance between microphones (programmed into the measuring system)

ρ0 : value for the density of the air (programmed into the measuring system)

The result of the intensity measurement is consequently: ##EQU3##

It can be shown that the intensity measured for a sine wave is: ##EQU4## P1, P2 are peak values of the pressures in the measuring points of the microphones,

w is the angular frequency,

A is the angle between the direction of propagation of the sound and the probe axis and

c is the speed of sound in the actual field.

If the probe is placed in a plane sound wave with its axis in the direction of propagation (A=0) and if the input ρ0 and Δr0 corresponds to the values of ρ and Δr, the left-hand fraction of the measuring result expresses the real intensity of the field while the right-hand fraction is the frequency characteristics of the system representing the measuring error applying to this method, method 1.

The pressure difference microphone measures the pressure difference between two points. The pressure microphone is positioned in the sound intensity probe in such a way that the microphone measures the pressure exactly between these points. The pressure microphone is situated in the measuring point of the sound field.

In this method p(t) is measured directly by means of the pressure microphone.

The pressure difference microphone measures the pressure at two points with the distance Δr and gives the pressure difference Δp.

The expression for the particle speed from method 1 is also usable in this case, since

Δp=p1 (t)-p2 (t).

The result of the intensity measurement is thus ##EQU5## Δr0 is the distance over which Δp is measured (programmed into the measuring apparatus).

It can be shown that the intensity measured for a sine wave is: ##EQU6## P0 is the peak value of the pressure in the point for measuring the intensity and

P1, P2 are the peak values of the pressures detected by the pressure gradient microphone.

If the probe is placed in a plane sound wave with its axis in the direction of propagation (A=0), and if the input of ρ0 and Δr0 corresponds to the values of ρ and Δr, the left-hand fraction of the measuring result expresses the real intensity of the field while the right-hand fraction is the frequency characteristics of the system representing the measuring error in connection with this method, method 2.

In this embodiment the pressure microphone is insensitive to directions.

A pressure microphone is insensitive to directions in the plane where it measures the gradient--i.e. in the plane parallel to the two membranes in the probe.

The pressure gradient microphone can be varied in many ways without deviating from the idea of the invention. For example, the membrane need not necessarily be circular. It can also be oval or angular. The film of electret material is not necessarily placed on the back electrode. It can also be placed on the membrane.

Erling, Frederiksen

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10257617, Jan 07 2011 STMicroelectronics S.r.l.; Omron Corporation Acoustic transducer
10405107, Jan 07 2011 STMicroelectronics S.r.l.; Omron Corporation Acoustic transducer
10484798, Jan 07 2011 STMicroelectronics S.r.l.; Omron Corporation Acoustic transducer and microphone using the acoustic transducer
5029215, Dec 29 1989 AT&T Bell Laboratories Automatic calibrating apparatus and method for second-order gradient microphone
5450497, May 11 1992 GGEC AMERICA, INC Audio transducer improvements
6614911, Nov 19 1999 Gentex Corporation Microphone assembly having a windscreen of high acoustic resistivity and/or hydrophobic material
6882734, Feb 14 2001 Gentex Corporation Vehicle accessory microphone
7130431, Nov 19 1999 Gentex Corporation Vehicle accessory microphone
7136494, Nov 19 1999 Gentex Corporation Vehicle accessory microphone assembly having a windscreen with hydrophobic properties
7415122, May 25 2000 Malikie Innovations Limited Microphone shield system
7447320, Feb 14 2001 Gentex Corporation Vehicle accessory microphone
7616768, Feb 14 2001 Gentex Corporation Vehicle accessory microphone having mechanism for reducing line-induced noise
7945063, May 25 2000 Malikie Innovations Limited Microphone shield system
8175293, Apr 16 2009 Nokia Technologies Oy Apparatus, methods and computer programs for converting sound waves to electrical signals
8224012, Apr 06 2000 Gentex Corporation Vehicle accessory microphone
8350683, Aug 25 1999 Donnelly Corporation Voice acquisition system for a vehicle
8531279, Aug 25 1999 MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC Accessory mounting system for a vehicle
8682005, Nov 19 1999 Gentex Corporation Vehicle accessory microphone
9283900, Aug 25 1999 MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC Accessory mounting system for a vehicle
9363608, Jan 07 2011 STMICROELECTRONICS S R L Acoustic transducer
9380380, Jan 07 2011 STMICROELECTRONICS S R L Acoustic transducer and interface circuit
9843868, Jan 07 2011 STMicroelectronics S.r.l.; Omron Corporation Acoustic transducer
9936305, Jan 07 2011 STMICROELECTRONICS S R L Acoustic transducer and microphone using the acoustic transducer
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3588382,
3944756, Mar 05 1975 MARINE MIDLAND BANK, N A , A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT Electret microphone
4258235, Nov 03 1978 TELEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC Pressure gradient electret microphone
4559418, Oct 08 1982 Primo Company Limited Ceramic microphone
AU489110,
GB2110054,
GB2112605,
GB2177798A,
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Feb 22 1988ERLING, FREDERIKSENAktieselskabet Bruel & KjaerASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0048600976 pdf
Mar 07 1988Aktieselskabet Bruel & Kjaer(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 08 1993M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jun 22 1993ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
May 23 1997M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
May 25 2001M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.
Aug 22 2001ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Aug 22 2001RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Dec 12 19924 years fee payment window open
Jun 12 19936 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 12 1993patent expiry (for year 4)
Dec 12 19952 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Dec 12 19968 years fee payment window open
Jun 12 19976 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 12 1997patent expiry (for year 8)
Dec 12 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Dec 12 200012 years fee payment window open
Jun 12 20016 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 12 2001patent expiry (for year 12)
Dec 12 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)