A tuned vibration absorber comprises a laminated constrained layer beam formed from at least two rigid plates joined together by a layer of elastomer. One end of the laminated structure is mounted in a rigid base so that the laminated structure forms a cantilever constrained layer beam. The lamianted constrained beam is constructed so as to vibrate normal to the laminated structure at a resonance frequency that is to be dampened. The elastomer layer converts the vibrational kinetic energy into heat so that the heat can be removed. An array of tuned vibration absorbers is formed so as to damp a wide range of frequencies. The resonance frequencies of the tuned vibration absorbers are regularly spaced about the resonance frequency. The tuned array vibration absorber thus absorbs some of the vibrational kinetic energy and disperses the remainder over a wide range of frequencies to reduce the maximum amplitude of the vibrations that occur at any one frequency.

Patent
   4924976
Priority
Sep 04 1987
Filed
Sep 04 1987
Issued
May 15 1990
Expiry
Sep 04 2007
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
13
37
all paid
1. A tuned vibration absorber mounted to an object to damp vibrations of the object, comprising;
at least first and second layers of rigid material;
at least one layer of elastomer material between said at least two rigid layers to form a laminated constrained layer beam;
means for rapidly accelerating and decelerating the object; and
a rigid base to support one end of said laminated constrained layer beam to form a cantilever constrained layer that vibrates at a predetermined resonance frequency, said base further securing said cantilever constrained layer beam to the object.
14. A tuned array vibration absorber, comprising:
two or more tuned vibration absorbers, each tuned vibration absorber being tuned to preferentially absorb vibrations occurring at a discrete resonance frequency, said discrete resonance frequency of each tuned vibration absorber being spaced apart so as to disperse any remaining vibrational kinetic energy over a broader frequency range, said resonance frequency range corresponding to a predetermined resonance frequency range of an object on which said tuned array and vibration absorber is mounted, each tuned vibration absorber comprising:
at least first and second layers of rigid material;
at least one layer of elastomer material between said at least rigid layers to form a laminated constrained layer beam;
a rigid base to support one end of said laminated constrained layer beam to form a cantilever constrained layer beam that vibrates at said predetermined resonance frequency;
each of said vibration absorbers being tuned to vibrate near said predetermined resonance frequency range.
7. A tuned array vibration absorber, comprising:
two or more tuned vibration absorbers, each tuned vibration absorber being tuned to preferentially absorb vibrations occurring at a discrete resonance frequency, said discrete resonance frequency of each tuned vibration absorber being spaced apart so as to disperse any remaining vibrational kinetic energy over a broader frequency range, said resonance frequency range corresponding to a predetermined resonance frequency range of an object on which said tuned array vibration absorber is mounted, each tuned vibration absorber comprising:
at least first and second layers of rigid material;
at least one layer of elastomer material between said at least rigid layers to form a laminated constrained layer beam;
a rigid base to support one end of said laminated constrained layer beam to form a cantilever constrained layer beam that vibrates at said predetermined resonance frequency;
each of said vibration absorbers being tuned to vibrate near said predetermined resonance frequency range within a predetermined temperature range so that said at least two vibration absorbers vibrate within said resonance frequency range at any temperature within said predetermined temperature range.
2. A tuned vibration absorber as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first and second layers are metal.
3. A tuned vibration absorber as claimed in claim 2, wherein said first layer is steel and said second layer is aluminum.
4. A tuned vibration absorber as claimed in claim 3, further comprising means for dissipating heat from said elastomer layer.
5. A tuned vibration absorber as claimed in claim 4, wherein said heat dissipation means comprises a fan for circulating air.
6. A tuned vibration absorber as claimed in claim 1, wherein the means for rapidly accelerating and decelerating the object comprises an actuator for a disk drive.
8. A tuned array vibration absorber as claimed in claim 7, wherein said object is an actuator for a disk drive.
9. A tuned array vibration absorber as claimed in claim 7, wherein said tuned array vibration absorber is mounted on the actuator coil of a disk drive.
10. A tuned array vibration absorber as claimed in claim 9, further comprising means for dissipating heat.
11. A tuned array vibration absorber as claimed in claim 10, wherein said heat dissipation means comprises a fan for circulating air.
12. A tuned array vibration absorber as claimed in claim 11, wherein said array comprises two sets of three vibration absorbers each.
13. A tuned array vibration absorber as claimed in claim 7, wherein three or more tuned vibration absorbers are tuned to vibrate near said resonance frequency.

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a tuned array vibration absorber. Specifically, a cantilever constrained layer damping beam is formed by mounting a laminated structure in a rigid base. The dampening beam damps the vibrational kinetic energy that is traverse to its laminar layers at a discrete frequency. An array of dampening beams absorbs some of the vibrational kinetic energy and disperses the remaining vibrational kinetic energy over a broader frequency range.

2. Description of related art

Many objects vibrate at a discrete resonance frequency. It is often necessary to damp the resonance vibrations. For example, the actuator of a disk drive undergoes rapid acceleration and deceleration as it seeks its prescribed track on the disk. The sudden stopping causes the actuator to vibrate at a predetermined resonance frequency. The resonance vibrations can cause the read head to erroneously read adjacent tracks on the disk. Both the speed and accuracy of a disk drive are thus limited by the time required for the resonance vibration of the actuator to damp out.

Different techniques have been tried to damp out the resonance vibrations of the actuator coil of a disk drive. One solution moves a high density mass through grease so that fluid friction removes vibrational energy from the actuator coil. The grease dampening, however, damps all frequencies of vibration to the same extent and therefore does not discriminate in favor of the resonance vibrations.

Another solution is to make part of the structure to be damped from a vibration absorbing material. This solution has several disadvantages. It may not be practical to incorporate vibration absorbing material into a structure. The vibration absorbing material often reduces the strength of the structure because damping material is generally less rigid than the material it replaces.

The present invention relates to a cantilever constrained layer damping beam that damps out kinetic energy at a particular vibration frequency. The resonance frequency of the tuned vibration absorbers is determined, i.e. "tuned", during manufacture by adjusting various physical parameters. The weight of the vibration absorber need be only a small fraction of the object being damped.

A tuned array vibration absorber according to the present invention is formed from an array of individual tuned vibration absorbers, each of which comprises at least two metal plates that are bonded to an elastomer to form a laminated structure. One end of the laminated structure is mounted in a rigid base while the other end is free to vibrate. The laminated structure and rigid base form the cantilever constrained layer damping beam. The composition and dimensions of the laminated layers are chosen so that the tuned array vibration absorber has a resonance frequency that corresponds to the resonance frequency of the object being dampened. The vibration of the laminated structure converts vibrational energy into heat in the elastomer layer.

The tuned vibration absorbers can be mounted on the actuator coil of a disk drive, or any other object, to damp its resonance vibrations. Each tuned vibration absorber is highly sensitive to operating temperature due, in part, to the wide variation with temperature in resiliency of the elastomer layer. It is therefore preferred to mount a plurality of tuned vibration absorbers on the actuator coil to form the array. Each vibration absorber is tuned during manufacture to vibrate at the resonance frequency of the actuator coil at a particular operating temperature. At least one vibration absorber is tuned to vibrate at the frequency of the actuator coil at any given operating temperature within a predetermined operating range. A systematic warming or cooling of the disk drive thus causes a second vibration absorber to begin vibrating near the resonance peak of the actuator coil as the resonance frequency of the first vibration absorber shifts away from the frequency of the actuator coil. Each vibration absorber has the shape of a radiator so as to dissipate the thermal energy from the elastomer layer.

An array of tuned vibration absorbers has particular utility when the vibration frequency of each tuned vibration absorber is closely and evenly spaced about the resonance frequency of an object being damped. Each vibration absorber in the array absorbs vibrational energy at a particular frequency and shifts the remaining vibrational energy to both higher and lower frequencies. The tuned array vibration absorber thus reduces the total vibrational kinetic energy and disperses the remaining vibrational kinetic energy over a wide range of frequencies. The amplitude of the vibrations are therefore reduced. The tuned array vibration absorber formed from the cantilever constrained layered dampening beams is lightweight and easy to mount on any object such as the actuator coil of a disk drive.

FIG. 1 shows a tuned vibration absorber according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 shows an array of tuned vibration absorbers of the type shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 shows two arrays of tuned vibration absorbers of the type shown in FIG. 2 mounted on the actuator coil of a disk drive; and

FIGS. 4a, 4b and 4c show the effect of an array of tuned vibration absorbers of the present invention on the resonance behavior of the actuator coil of a disk drive.

FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the present invention that is particularly well adapted for dampening vibrations of the actuator coil in a disk drive. A first rigid layer 101 is bonded to a second rigid layer 102 by a layer of elastomer 103 to form a laminated structure. The laminated structure is mounted on rigid base 104. The rigid base and laminated structure form a cantilever constrained layer damping beam that functions as a tuned vibration absorber.

The dampening characteristics of the tuned vibration absorber are determined by several parameters. The length, thickness and composition of the plates determines the resonance frequency of the constrained layer damping beam. The resilience of the elastomer also determines the resonance frequency of the tuned vibration absorber. The resiliance undergoes significant change with temperature. The temperature of the tuned vibration absorber is therefore a parameter. The laminated structure can be treated as a composite beam for purposes of determining its vibrational behavior. One skilled in the art can readily adjust the appropriate parameters to determine the vibrational behavior for a particular composite beam. The resonance frequency of the vibration absorber should correspond to the resonance frequency of the object being damped, e.g. the actuator coil of a disk drive. The vibration absorber damps only those vibrations that are transverse to the laminar layers.

One embodiment of the present invention that is particularly insensitive to temperature variations uses a laminate structure where the rigid layers are steel and aluminum plates. Each plate is approximately 0.025" thick, 1/2" long and 1/2" wide. Elastomer layer 103 comprises IDS 110 isomeric dampening material manufactured by the 3M Company.

FIG. 2 shows an array of three tuned vibration absorbers 201-203 mounted on a rigid base 204. A bevelled surface 205 is cut into base 204. Each tuned vibration absorber 201-203 therefore has a slightly different length. The difference in length causes a difference in the resonance frequency of each tuned vibration absorber. All the tuned vibration absorbers are nevertheless tuned to near a predetermined resonance frequency. In one embodiment of the present invention, the tuned array vibration absorber is formed from a laminar structure in which each tuned vibration absorber has a thickness of 0.025" and separated from each other by a distance of 0.1". The change in length between adjacent vibration absorbers is approximately 0.025".

FIG. 3 shows two arrays of tuned vibration absorbers 301 and 302 on the actuator coil 300 of a disk drive. The vibration absorbers damp vibrations in the horizontal plane of the actuator coil at the resonance frequency of the coil. A fan 304 provides air circulation around the tuned vibration absorbers to remove any excess heat generated in the elastomer layers.

The constrained layer beams are preferably constructed to operate over different temperature regions covering the full operating range of the disk drive. In the embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 3, six constrained layer beams are tuned so that at least three beams are at or near the resonance frequency of the actuator coil.

The laminar structure of each tuned vibration absorber removes kinetic energy from the actuator coil by converting it into heat in the elastomer layer. A tuned vibration absorber thus could overheat if the elastomer layer absorbed too much heat too quickly. The increased temperature of a vibration absorber would shift its resonance frequency away from the resonance frequency of the actuator coil. The operating temperature of the disk drive, however, would not significantly increase. The overheating of an entire array of tuned vibration absorbers thus could cause the actuator coil to temporally lose all damping. The rate at which the tuned vibration absorber can dissipate heat must therefore always exceed the rate at which the elastomer layer needs to absorb heat.

The tuned vibration absorber of the present invention overcomes the possibility of overheating by adopting the shape of a radiator. Each tuned vibration absorber has the shape of a radiator fin with thermally conductive metal plates conducting heat away from the elastomer layer. Additional ventilation means, such as fan 304, can circulate air around the tuned vibration absorber to facilitate the removal of thermal energy by convective transfer.

Additional layers of metal plates and elastomer could be added to the tuned vibration absorber shown in FIG. 1. The additional layers could be constructed so as to vibrate over different temperature ranges. However, additional layers could decrease the efficiency of a tuned vibration absorber for any given temperature range due to the increased rigidity of the vibration absorber caused by the additional layers of non-resonance material. The additional layers could also reduce the ability of the laminar structure to dissipate heat. It is therefore preferred that a tuned array vibration absorber comprise multiple constrained layer beams so that the resonance behavior of at least one beam matches the resonance frequency of the actuator coil over the working range of the temperature of the disk drive.

FIG. 4a represents the frequency distribution of an undampened actuator coil around its resonance frequency. FIG. 4b represents the frequency distribution for an actuator coil that is dampened with only two tuned vibration absorbers. The tuned vibration absorber converts the resonance maxma 401 into a local frequency minima 402 and spreads the vibrational energy over a wider range of frequencies as represented by local maxima 403 and 404 of FIG. 4b. The amplitude 451 of local maxima 403 and 404 is less than the amplitude 450 of maxima 401. The decrease in resonance vibration has the beneficial effect of reducing the overall vibration of the actuator coil. The tuned array vibration absorber works by absorbing vibrational kinetic energy and by spreading the remaining vibrational kinetic energy over a wider frequency range so that the frequency maxmina have a lower amplitude.

FIG. 4c represents the frequency distribution of an actuator coil that is dampened with three tuned vibration absorbers of the type that comprise the tuned array vibration absorber shown in FIG. 2. Local frequency maxima 403 and 404 have been replaced by local frequency minima 405 and 406, respectively. Local vibration maxima 407-410 are now present. The amplitude 452 of frequency maxima 407-410 is less than the amplitude 451 of vibration maxima 403 and 404 shown in FIG. 4b. The vibrational kinetic energy is dispersed over a wider range of frequencies. Additional tuned vibration absorbers could further reduce the amplitude of the vibrations and further disperse the vibrational kinetic energy.

The tuned vibration absorber of the present invention does not decrease the mechanical strength of the object on which it is mounted. The cantilevered nature of the constrained layer beams permits attaching the tuned vibration absorber to a structure rather than requiring building the dampening material intrigal therewith. Further, the mass of the tuned array of vibration absorbers can be substantially less than the mass of the object being damped. For example, the array of six tuned vibration absorbers for the actuator coil of a disk drive shown in FIG. 2 need have only 1/250 the mass of the actuator coil. The damping structure thus does not interfere with the operation of the actuator.

The principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention have been described in the foregoing specification. The invention which is intended to be protected herein should not, however, be construed as limited to any particular embodiment described, such as an actuator coil for a disk drive, because it is to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. One skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the tuned vibration absorber and array disclosed herein could damp any object. Variations and changes to the disclosed embodiment may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description should be considered exemplary in nature and not as limiting to the scope and spirit of the invention set forth in the appended claims.

Bernett, Frank

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10228351, Sep 24 2014 Rosemount Inc Acoustic detection in process environments
11369521, Feb 16 2017 3M Innovative Properties Company Earmuff hearing-protection device comprising sound-attenuating members
11512756, Dec 19 2019 The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy Manufacture methods relating to a subordinate oscillator array
5127498, Jan 16 1990 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, A MA CORP Impedance matches mass damper
5241512, Apr 25 1991 Hutchinson 2 Acoustic protection material and apparatus including such material
5385219, Apr 25 1990 The Secretary of State for Defence in Her Britannic Majesty's Government Vibration absorbing structures for heavy construction purposes
5386894, Jul 12 1990 ENAC S A Vibration damping device
5550335, Dec 16 1993 LFK-Lenkflugkoerpersysteme GmbH Resonance absorber
6209842, May 27 1998 International Business Machines Corporation Laminated damping device for a carrier
6371433, May 27 1998 International Business Machines Corporation Laminated damping device for a carrier and a method for making the same
6621658, Jul 14 1999 Material Sciences Corporation Vibration damping laminate with vibration isolating cut therein
6674601, Oct 12 1999 Seagate Technology LLC Method and apparatus for electronically shifting mechanical resonance of an actuator system of a disc drive
8454449, Nov 12 2007 GKN Driveline North America, Inc Drive shaft with array tuned absorber
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2126704,
2655005,
2702703,
2724983,
3006627,
3160549,
3480268,
3519260,
3770291,
3882541,
4032202, Mar 19 1975 Toyota Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Vibration control bush assembly
4150588, Dec 29 1976 Brewer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Dynamic vibration absorber
4230291, Jun 07 1978 United Technologies Corporation Tuned spring-mass vibration absorber
4318145, Oct 18 1979 Unisys Corporation Multiple-transducer/actuator array
4340835, Jan 21 1978 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Piezoelectrically driven tuning fork with integral damper member
4346597, Nov 03 1980 United Technologies Corporation Dual range, cantilevered mass accelerometer
4364594, Aug 10 1978 Fried. Krupp Huttenwerke AG Railway wheel vibration damping device
4365770, Aug 04 1978 United Technologies Corp. Fixed position variable frequency pendular-type vibration absorber
4373608, Dec 20 1979 General Electric Company Tuned sound barriers
4392681, Jun 02 1979 Fried, Krupp Huttenwerke AG Rotating body sympathetic vibration absorber
4420371, May 25 1982 Beloit Technologies, Inc Energy absorbers for vibrating headboxes
4470121, Aug 17 1981 United Technologies Corporation Multi-frequency vibration controller using fluid-filled cantilever beam for vibration excitation & absorption
4525081, Sep 09 1983 Rosemount Inc.; ROSEMOUNT INC , 12001 WEST 78TH ST , EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 A MN CORP Vibration dampened beam
4550589, May 02 1984 Pacific Scientific Company System for monitoring snubber loads
4553884, May 10 1982 KENNAMETAL PC INC Boring tool and method of reducing vibrations therein
4583912, Mar 16 1984 ITT CORPORATION, 320 PARK AVE , NEW YORK, NY, A CORP OF DE Damped dynamic vibration absorber
4593501, Oct 11 1983 NEW DYNAMICS INC ; ISOSYS, INC Vibration and shock isolator with adjustable stiffness
4603985, Jun 21 1984 International Business Machines Corporation Backstop and damping apparatus for actuator
4626730, Aug 14 1984 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Method and apparatus for active control of vibrations
4627635, Sep 20 1983 Vibration damping units and vibration damped products
4635882, Apr 11 1979 The Boeing Company Method and apparatus for reducing low to mid frequency interior noise
4639009, Dec 30 1985 SITCA ACQUISITIONS INC , SITCA , A CORP OF WA Snow ski with elastomeric sidewalls
4659069, Aug 27 1982 Laminated mechanical elements
4694650, Jul 28 1986 Mechanical Technology Incorporated Externally tuned vibration absorber
4706788, Apr 15 1985 Melles Griot, Irvine Company Vibration damped apparatus
4734079, Aug 30 1985 Tschan GmbH Apparatus for suppressing torsional vibrations and radially acting flexural vibrations of rotary shafts
SU1068636,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Sep 04 1987Digital Equipment Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 01 1987BERNETT, FRANKDIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, 146 MAIN STREET, MAYNARD, MA 01754ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0048050136 pdf
Apr 04 1996Digital Equipment CorporationQuantum CorporationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0079360273 pdf
Aug 18 1997Quantum CorporationCANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTRELEASE0087440904 pdf
Jul 24 2001Quantum CorporationMaxtor CorporationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0126530726 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jul 19 1993ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Nov 04 1993M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 30 1997M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 27 2001M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
May 15 19934 years fee payment window open
Nov 15 19936 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 15 1994patent expiry (for year 4)
May 15 19962 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
May 15 19978 years fee payment window open
Nov 15 19976 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 15 1998patent expiry (for year 8)
May 15 20002 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
May 15 200112 years fee payment window open
Nov 15 20016 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 15 2002patent expiry (for year 12)
May 15 20042 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)