This invention relates to a dynamic seal or bearing interface having areas with different roughnesses. The different surface areas both provide asperity tip load support for the opposing interface.
|
1. A dynamic seal or bearing interface having a surface comprising:
a first interface area which provides a first amount of surface roughness which provides asperity tip load support; and a second interface area which provides a second amount of surface roughness which provides asperity tip load support, said second amount of surface roughness within said second interface area being different from said first amount of surface roughness within said first interface area.
2. The invention of
3. The invention of
4. The invention of
5. The invention of
6. The invention of
7. The invention of
8. The invention of
9. The invention of
10. The invention of
11. The invention of
12. A dynamic seal or bearing interface as claimed in
13. The invention of
14. The invention of
15. The invention of
16. The invention of
17. The invention of
18. The invention of
19. The invention of
20. The invention of
21. The invention of
22. The invention of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a continuation of co-pending application Ser. No. 168,519 filed on Mar. 15, 1988, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,834,400.
The invention relates to dynamic seals and bearings and more particularly to dynamic seals and bearings incorporating materials which wear to provide surfaces differing in roughness, which surfaces provide asperity tip load support. If desired, the dynamic seals and bearings can further comprise materials which wear by different amounts.
Dynamic seals are those which act to control fluid leakage between two surfaces which slide against one another. Such seals are quite common and include face seals for pumps, ship propeller shafts, compressors and appliances, lip seals for oil and grease, packings for pistons and piston rods, and piston rings for engines and compressors. Performance of existing sealing devices frequently imposes limits on the reliability, life and efficiency of machines requiring their use. Indeed, many sealed bearings fail in service due to failure of a dynamic seal therein. Process industries spend a good deal of time and money maintaining and replacing dynamic seals in their equipment.
Most dynamic seals suffer from two limitations. First, the seal typically wears out faster than the rest of the machine of which it forms a part. Second, the seal intrinsically contributes significantly to the frictional load of the machine in which it functions. These limitations occur because a dynamic seal comprises two surfaces or faces squeezed together which slide against each other during the operation of the machine of which it is a part. In many cases, lubrication of the seal during the time the faces are sliding against each other is poor at best.
Recent advances in seal and bearing technology have primarily been addressed to improved materials, such as materials having a higher hardness, materials with improved resistance to heat and corrosion and materials which use polymers. Improvements have also been made in the geometry of seals. For example, waviness and radial taper have been used in face seals and various types of grooves have been used on lip seals. U-cup, V-wedge and slipper seal designs have been used in packings.
Other seals and bearings have been developed having "peaks" and "valleys" on the sliding surfaces to enhance lubrication. Otto, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,572,730, entitled WEAR SURFACE FOR FACILITATING LUBRICATION OF ELEMENTS IN ENGAGEMENT THEREWITH and U.S. Pat. No. 3,586,340, entitled WEAR SURFACE AND SEAL CONSTRUCTION, and in SAE Transactions, Vol. 83, 1974, entitled "Triangular Asperities Control Seal Leakage and Lubrication," teaches the use of lithographic or photographic techniques to provide a bearing surface which has a geometric array of large size triangular asperities. The surfaces are then coated with plastic so that the voids surrounding the asperities are filled with plastic. The plastic then preferentially wears during operation exposing the triangular asperities. Otto does not teach differential roughness or providing load support across the entire surface.
Others teach the use of alternating hard and soft surface materials to provide various useful characteristics as disclosed in the following patents: U.S. Pat. No. 4,474,861, entitled COMPOSITE BEARING STRUCTURE OF ALTERNATING HARD AND SOFT METAL. AND PROCESS FOR MAKING THE SAME, to Ecer; U.S. Pat. No. 1,637,317, entitled BEARING, to Shoemaker; U.S. Pat. No. 3,235,316, entitled JOURNAL BEARING WITH ALTERNATING SURFACE AREAS OF WEAR RESISTANT AND ANTI-GALLING MATERIALS, to Whanger; U.S. Pat. No. 2,971,248, entitled COMPOSITE BEARINGS AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME, to Kingsley, et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 2,268,869, entitled BEARING MEMBER, to Given; U.S. Pat. No. 356,331, entitled ANTI FRICTION JOURNAL BEARING, to Randolph; U.S. Pat. No. 4,562,122, entitled MULTI-LAYER PLAIN BEARING, to Hodes, et al. (see FIG. 3 of Hodes); U.S. Pat. No. 3,656,823, entitled SLIDABLE CARRIER OR SUPPORT, to Tiraspolsky, et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 3,961,104, entitled INTERNAL CYLINDRICAL BEARING SURFACES, to Tanner; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,075,816, entitled BEARINGS FOR RELATIVELY ROTATING MEMBERS, to Harris, et al None of these references disclose differential roughness, differential wear or providing load support across the entire surface.
One relatively unexplored approach to improving seal life and efficiency is to control the microgeometry or microtopography, i.e., the geometric variations in surface roughness which establish lubricating fluid film height variations of the seal face. The present invention addresses this approach utilizing a bearing comprising a surface having regions which, as they wear, yield different amounts of surface roughness which still provides asperity tip load support. Ancillary to this, and in conjunction therewith, the wear rate of the surface regions in combination with the surface roughness may be controlled during the use and consequently during the wear of the bearing surface. Bearings and seals in accordance with the invention have enhanced load support and lubrication characteristics, and control fluid leakage by utilizing surfaces having regions of differential roughness. By utilizing differential roughness, different regions of the bearing surface develop different effective film thicknesses, thereby controlling hydrodynamic and hydrostatic pressures.
In accordance with the invention, there is provided a dynamic seal or bearing interface having a surface comprising a first interface area which, as it wears, provides a first amount of surface roughness which provides asperity tip load support; and a second interface area which, as it wears, provides a second amount of surface roughness which provides asperity tip load support. The second amount of surface roughness within the second interface area is different from the first amount of surface roughness within the first interface area. The first and second interface areas can be alternating and intersticed or alternating and contiguous.
Preferably, the interface areas are made of different materials, although these areas may be of the same material with one interface area having a different microstructure which thus develops a different roughness than the other interface area. At least one of the interface areas should be treated to a depth of at least 0.005 inches to produce a rough surface for a long-wearing seal. The interface areas may be a layer or layers affixed to a substrate or may be the same material as the substrate material.
Some specific base materials and the preferred materials or processes which may be utilized in accordance with the intention to produce a differential surface roughness in the two interface areas are set forth in Table I.
| TABLE I |
| ______________________________________ |
| Preferred Materials and Processes of the Invention. |
| Base Material Material or Process |
| ______________________________________ |
| Gray iron Leaching, filling, chrome |
| plating or flame spray |
| Cast iron Hard chrome/soft chrome |
| Carbidic malleable iron |
| Laser heat treat |
| Alumina High density/low density |
| Silicon nitride High density/low density |
| Carbon Graphite Siliconizing, density |
| variation, variable filler |
| Polymer Variable filler, radiation |
| ______________________________________ |
One object of the invention is to improve dynamic seal and bearing life.
Another object of the invention is to improve dynamic seal and bearing reliability.
One advantage in practicing the invention is that maintenance costs and down times are reduced when using dynamic seals and bearings in accordance with the invention.
Another advantage of the invention is that dynamic seals and bearings in accordance with the invention are efficient.
Other objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawing, which is incorporated into and forms a part of the specification, illustrates several embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serves to explain the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1 illustrates a cross section of a prior art seal or bearing showing peaks and valleys, wherein the valleys do not provide load-support;
FIG. 2 illustrates a cross section of an embodiment of the invention showing differential roughness;
FIG. 3 illustrates a cross section of a piston ring embodiment of the invention showing differential roughness;
FIG. 4 illustrates a radial land-dam seal embodiment of the invention; and
FIG. 5 illustrates a spiral-groove seal embodiment of the invention.
This invention relates to a dynamic seal or bearing comprising regions having a different roughness, which regions all provide load support. Because the various regions all provide load support, there is no differential wear. Wear is generally measured by measuring the roughness tips or peaks. Since all regions of the seal or bearing provide load support (peaks which contact an opposing face), then there would be no differential wear between these various regions.
FIG. 1 of the drawing shows a prior art seal cross section in which peak regions 10 and valley regions 12 occur on the surface of the seal. Note that only the peak regions 10 provide load support for the opposing surface 14; the valley regions 12 are not in contact with the opposing surface 14 and thus cannot provide load support. Because of the lack of load support from the valley regions 12, the seal will tend to distort or tilt. The microstructural roughness on the surface of the bearing regions is illustrated by the wavy or jagged lines.
FIG. 2 of the drawing, in contrast to the prior art configuration of FIG. 1, shows a seal cross section in accordance with the invention comprising peak regions 16 and valley regions 18 with a differential roughness. Both the peak regions 16 and valley regions 18 have asperity tips 20 which contact with and provide load support for the opposing bearing or seal surface 22. The horizontal lines shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 are not part of the surface, but are intended to illustrate, in both FIGS. 1 and 2, the average or mean surface level. The cross section in FIG. 3 (which does not have these horizontal lines) is more representative of how the surface would appear. Note that the roughness, as illustrated by the jagged lines in the drawing, is exaggerated for purposes of illustration. The roughness of the invention would not be as visible as it is on a microstructural level.
FIG. 3 of the invention illustrates a piston ring embodiment of the invention comprising a first region or area 24 having a first amount of roughness and a second region or area 26 having a second amount of roughness which is different than the first amount of roughness of the first area 24. Both areas 24 and 26 comprise asperity tips 28 which contact with and provide load support for an opposing surface 30.
FIG. 2 illustrates the peak regions 16 and valley regions 18 as a layer on a substrate material 32. Alternatively, the substrate material may also comprise the surface material as shown by region 24 in FIG. 3.
FIG. 4 illustrates a radial land-dam mechanical face seal embodiment of the invention wherein the "land" areas 34 and "dam" areas 36 have a roughness which is different than the other surface areas 38.
FIG. 5 illustrates a spiral-groove mechanical face seal embodiment of the invention wherein the "groove" areas 40 have a roughness which is different than the other surface areas 42.
As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the differential roughness of the invention can be applied to nearly any type of sliding, contacting, lubricated contact surface, including sliding bearings and sliding seal interfaces, to control lubrication and reduce friction. The differential roughness of the invention may be applied to mechanical face seals, reciprocating seals, lip seals, piston and rod packings, piston rings, bearings, rotating gas seals and the like. Throughout the specification and claims, the terms "seals" and "bearings" are often used interchangeably and are intended to include such interfaces mentioned above. The drawing illustrates only several of many possible cross sections of the seal or bearing of the invention. For example, seals having various geometries (such as the configurations shown in FIGS. 4 and 5) can comprise geometric regions having differential roughnesses. The differential roughness of the invention has commercial applications for mechanical seal manufacturers, aircraft turbojet engine manufacturers, auto makers, air and hydraulic cylinder manufacturers, compressor manufacturers, adiabatic engines, rotary combustion engines, rocket engines and advanced turbojet engines.
The surface area of the seal or bearing having the highest degree of roughness (the peak-to-valley height), such as the valley regions 18 shown in FIG. 2 and the second area 26 shown in FIG. 3, provides a pressure change, a greater fluid film thickness and enhanced lubrication for the seal. The asperity tips provide load support, less friction and a longer-lasting and better-wearing seal. The lubrication of seals and bearings is controlled by selecting the height of the fluid film gap. It is well known in the art that the effective fluid film gap for a lubricant is approximately equal to the distance between asperity peaks and the mean level (represented by the horizontal lines in FIG. 2) of the bearing surface. Therefore, the effective fluid film gap for a surface, in contact, is proportional to the surface roughness. This applies to two rough surfaces in contact with each other as well as to a smooth surface contacting a rough surface. Thus, lubrication can be controlled, in accordance with the invention, by using materials which evolve different roughnesses which, in turn, provide different levels of effective film thickness. The rougher material inherently has a greater average depth for fluid flow, creating in effect a differential surface height.
The surface regions of the seal of the invention having a differential roughness may be provided in various way. For example, different materials in a composite structure may be utilized. Alternatively, a material which has selectively altered regions may be utilized. The differential roughness may evolve due to the nature of the material itself, the lubrication present and/or the sliding processes.
There are many techniques or processes which may be utilized in accordance with the invention to provide an interface surface with a selective differential roughness and, if desired, differential wear. Some of these techniques include nitriding (for instance, the nitriding of stainless steel using machined patterns for masking); stellite treatment; siliconizing; surface depth heat treating, such as by a laser or torch; electron beam or irradiation (such as ultraviolet, gamma or high-energy radiation) property modification; sintering (for instance, prior to the sintering, the areas are differentially compacted or compressed); surface alloying; joining of different materials; patterned chemical treatments for polymers; patterned polymerization; impregnation (such as resin for carbons); grain size refinement; differential material fatigue; filling; laser or vapor or chemical deposition; leaching or etching; plating; flame or plasma spraying; chroming; melting; coating with PTFE (Teflon, a trademark); density variation; and the like. The use of different materials tends to provide more of a differential roughness than when the same material is utilized.
Some specific base materials and the preferred materials or processes which may be utilized to produce differential roughnesses in which base materials are set forth in Table II.
| TABLE II |
| ______________________________________ |
| Preferred Materials and Processes of the Invention. |
| Base Material Material or Process |
| ______________________________________ |
| Gray Iron Leaching, filling, chrome |
| plating or flame spray |
| Cast iron Hard chrome/soft chrome |
| Carbidic malleable iron |
| Laser heat treat |
| Alumina High density/low density |
| Silicon nitiride High density/low density |
| Carbon Graphite Siliconizing, density |
| variation, variable filler |
| Polymer Variable filler, radiation |
| ______________________________________ |
As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a differential roughness can be provided by other processes or materials and is not limited to those discussed above.
Regardless of the specific process or materials used to provide a differential roughness, the roughness needs to be deep enough to retain the roughness characteristics as the surface wears. Preferably, the surface is treated by processes, such as those discussed above, to a depth of at least approximately 0.005 inches.
The surface or interface areas having a differential roughness may be alternating and intersticed or alternating and contiguous.
A mechanical face seal was produced having a stainless steel face riding against carbon in water. Radial bands or strips were nitrided onto the steel. The face was ground flat at the start of the test. After two days of continuous operation, friction smoothed out and became markedly lower, leakage decreased and the seal ran very well for the balance of the test. The lubrication improved because of better hydrodynamic lubrication.
Accordingly, this invention relates to improved seals and bearings having a differential surface roughness. Such seals and bearings can be operated longer and more reliably in more severe environments, have a reduced maintenance cost, more in-service time, reduced friction, improved lubrication and a higher produce quality.
Although the invention has been described with reference to these preferred embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Variations and modifications of the present invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10337619, | Aug 27 2013 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Seal ring composite for improved hydrodynamic seal performance |
| 5019738, | Jul 16 1990 | GSI Group Corporation | Self-pressurizing gas supported surface-roughness bearing |
| 5064298, | Nov 30 1989 | NTN Corporation | Machine parts having minute random recesses |
| 5092747, | Nov 15 1989 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Fluid compressing apparatus having bearing gap |
| 5133608, | Feb 07 1990 | Nippon Seiko Kabushiki Kaisha | Linear movement rolling guide apparatus and method of manufacturing bearing roller |
| 5141396, | Jul 14 1990 | Continental Automotive GmbH | Regenerating pump with graphite and plastic casing and impeller |
| 5201468, | Jul 31 1991 | KOHLER CO A WI CORPORATION | Pulsating fluid spray apparatus |
| 5487550, | Nov 12 1991 | Flowserve Management Company | Secondary gas/liquid mechanical seal assembly |
| 5531458, | Apr 20 1994 | Flowserve Corporation; FLOWSERVE INTERNATIONAL, INC ; FLOWSERVE HOLDINGS, INC ; Flowserve Management Company | Face seal with angled grooves |
| 5655782, | Apr 22 1996 | Ishikawajima-Harima Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Seal device for Lysholm compressor |
| 6105968, | Feb 24 1997 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Textured seal for reduced wear |
| 6735868, | Sep 07 2001 | Aktiebolaget SKF | Surface treatment method |
| 7284758, | Feb 24 1997 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Textured seal for reduced wear |
| 7484890, | Oct 13 2004 | JTEKT Corporation | Rolling slide member |
| 8313387, | Jan 30 2008 | NTN Corporation | Cage for constant velocity universal joint |
| 8317629, | Feb 01 2008 | NTN Corporation | Inner joint member for constant velocity universal joint, manufacturing method therefor, and constant velocity universal joint |
| 9091130, | Feb 13 2013 | VAREL INTERNATIONAL, IND., L.P. | Rock bit having a radially self-aligning metal faced seal |
| 9163458, | Feb 13 2013 | VAREL INTERNATIONAL, IND., L.P.; VAREL INTERNATIONAL, IND , L P | Rock bit having a flexible metal faced seal |
| 9163459, | Feb 13 2013 | VAREL INTERNATIONAL, IND., L.P.; VAREL INTERNATIONAL, IND , L P | Rock bit having a pressure balanced metal faced seal |
| 9261139, | Feb 06 2013 | TRELLEBORG SEALING SOLUTIONS US INC | Friction-reducing geometric surface feature |
| 9714712, | Aug 15 2014 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Hydrodynamic mating ring with integrated groove inlet pressure control |
| 9862069, | Nov 27 2014 | THIELENHAUS TECHNOLOGIES GMBH | Method for producing grooves on a camshaft |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 1902621, | |||
| 2577818, | |||
| 3961104, | Jun 11 1973 | Internal cylindrical bearing surfaces | |
| 4125637, | Apr 02 1976 | Laystall Engineering Company Limited | Process for embedding hard particles in a bearing surface |
| 4834400, | Mar 15 1988 | MECHANICAL SEAL TECHNOLOGY | Differential surface roughness dynamic seals and bearings |
| GB599161, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| May 26 1989 | University of New Mexico | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Dec 27 1993 | M283: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Jan 11 1994 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Jun 23 1998 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Nov 27 1998 | M284: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Nov 27 1998 | M286: Surcharge for late Payment, Small Entity. |
| Jun 11 2002 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Nov 27 2002 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Dec 26 2002 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Nov 27 1993 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| May 27 1994 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Nov 27 1994 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Nov 27 1996 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Nov 27 1997 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| May 27 1998 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Nov 27 1998 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Nov 27 2000 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Nov 27 2001 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| May 27 2002 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Nov 27 2002 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Nov 27 2004 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |