The internal blade damper is an elongated member with a damping surface of discrete width in contact with the interior blade surfaces. Contact is continuous throughout a substantial length. The damper extends between 2° and 30° from the radial direction, producing a direction of contact having some radial component. Centrifugal force loads the damping surface.
|
1. In a gas turbine engine having a rotor disk, a damped airfoil blade comprising:
a hollow airfoil blade secured to said disk and having interior surfaces, and having an effective radial length exposed to gas flow; and an internal damper comprising an elongated member having a damping surface of discrete width in contact with an interior surface continuously throughout a contact length which is greater than 50% of said effective radial length, in a direction having a radial component with respect to the center line of said rotor, said damping surface being the exclusive frictional contact between said damper and said blade.
2. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damper being stiffer in the direction parallel to said damping surface than in the direction perpendicular to said damping surface.
3. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damping surface oriented in a direction at least 2° from the radial direction and less than 30° from the radial direction.
4. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damper rectangular in cross-section having a minor dimension between 0.04 and 0.06 inches and a maximum dimension between 0.1 and 0.2 inches.
5. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damper supported at a radially inboard position of said blade and extending outwardly therefrom
6. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damper located in a radial plane through the axis of said rotor.
7. A damped airfoil blade as in
a plurality of cooling air passages through said blade; said damper located in one of said cooling air passages; and said damper blocking less than 25% of the air passage containing said damper.
8. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damping surface oriented in a direction at least 2° from the radial direction and less than 30° from the radial direction.
9. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damper rectangular in cross-section having a minor dimension between 0.04 and 0.06 inches and a maximum dimension between 0.1 and 0.2 inches.
10. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damper supported at a radially inboard position of said blade and extending outwardly therefrom.
11. A damped airfoil blade as in
said damper located in a radial plane through the axis of said rotor.
12. A damped airfoil blade as in
a plurality of cooling air passages through said blade; said damper located in one of said cooling air passages; and said damper blocking less than 25% of the air passage containing said damper.
|
The Government has rights in this invention pursuant to a contract awarded by the Department of the Air Force.
The invention relates to hollow blades for gas turbine engines and in particular to vibration damping of such blades.
Airfoil blades in both compressors and turbines of gas turbine engines are subject to high, sometimes pulsating forces. Blades can experience high vibratory stresses resulting from resonance or flutter instabilities. This is particularly true for hollow blades which are used to reduce weight and/or permit internal air cooling.
External restraints such as shrouds and platform dampers have been used to control the vibration problem. Internal dampers relying on impact or dry friction have also been suggested. These have packed the blades with particles or rods, or otherwise tended to wedge the dampers. This can overload and lock the damping action.
Frictional damping inherently requires some slipping. Such slippage can be broken into macro slip and micro slip action. Macro slip is defined as substantially single point contact while micro slip is defined as a slip phenomena occurring over multiple points along the line of surface. In micro slip all points of contact are not necessarily stuck or slipping simultaneously. The pattern of local stick or slip depends on the local normal load and local deformation between the materials of the two contact surfaces.
Both micro slip and macro slip theories indicate that the vibratory response is minimized when the damper stiffness is increased. In typical applications of turbine engines to ensure high stiffness with a functionally single point contact results in a heavy damper configuration. This heavy damper configuration tends to promote sticking of the damper because of excess loading.
Those approaches which involve wedging of the damper against the surface tend to promote high loading leading to jamming or sticking of the damper rendering it ineffective.
While dampers of the prior art may have had some micro slipping along with the macro slipping, the structure was selected based on macro slip concepts. Appreciation of the micro slip phenomena and the definition of new structure to take advantage of this phenomena provides a damper of light weight, less prone to locking, and more compatible with cooling air flow within a turbine blade.
A hollow airfoil blade is secured to a rotor disk either as a bonded blade or with a fir-tree type construction. The blade has interior surfaces and an effective radial length exposed to the gas flow through the gas turbine engine.
The internal damper comprises an elongated member with a damping surface of discrete width in contact with an interior surface of the blade. This contact is continuous throughout a contact length greater than 50% of the effective radial length. The contact is in the direction having a radial component with respect to the axis of the rotor, preferably with the damper extending between 2° and 30° from the radial direction. This damping surface is the exclusive frictional contact between the damper and the blade.
The damper cross-section is in the order of 0.2 inch by 0.06 inch with the major dimension being across the damping surface. This provides a damper stiffer in a direction parallel to the damping surface than in a direction perpendicular to the damping surface. Accordingly, the damper may readily conform to the wall to produce the continuous contact.
FIG. 1 illustrates a gas turbine engine showing several airfoil locations;
FIG. 2 is a circumferential looking view of an airfoil with a damper;
FIG. 3 is an axially looking view of an airfoil with a damper;
FIG. 4 is a top view of an airfoil with a damper; and
FIG. 5 is a section through the airfoil.
FIG. 1 illustrates a gas turbine engine 10 with rotor 12 including a compressor disk 14. The compressor disk carries compressor airfoil blade 16 located in the gas flow path 18.
Also on the rotor is a turbine disk 20 carrying a plurality of turbine airfoil blades 22 located in the gas flow path 24.
FIGS. 2, 3, 4 and 5 illustrate the use of the damper within a gas turbine airfoil blade 22. The airfoil blade is secured to the disk 20 by fir-tree 26 and damper 28 is secured or restrained at an inboard location 30 on the blade by lug 33. The damper extends outboard from this location. Damping surface 32 of the damper is 0.20 inch wide and is in contact with interior surface 34 of the blade throughout the entire length of the blade beyond platform 36. The distance 38 from the blade platform to the tip of the blade is the portion of the blade in contact with the gas flow 24 and is considered the effective radial length of the blade since this is a major factor in the vibration of the blade. The damping surface 32 should be in contact with the inner surface 34 continuously throughout a length equal to at least 50% of the effective radial length 38 of the blade.
The damper as illustrated here is 0.06 inch thick and 0.2 inch wide. This may be as low as 0.04 inch thick and 0.1 inch wide. In any event it is required that there be a discrete width of the damping surface in contact with the inner surface of the blade to provide a basis for the micro slip phenomena to occur. 0.1-0.2 inch is appropriate.
When installed against the inner surface of the blade the direction of the damping surface 32 is indicated by line 40 which is at an angle 42 of 3° with respect to the radial line 44. The centrifugal force operating on the damper forces the damper against the internal blade surface so long as this damping surface has some radial component with respect to the axis of the rotor. An angle of less than 2° will not provide sufficient loading against the surface while an angle exceeding 30° will produce too much loading leading to locking of the damper with loss of the energy dissipation capability.
As best seen in FIG. 4, the damper is preferably set in a radial plane through the rotor axis. With this orientation the centrifugal force establishes no direct force on the damper in the direction which is perpendicular to the engine centerline direction 45. The only force in that direction would be a resultant force based on the loading of the damper against the internal surface of the blade.
Turbine blade 22 also includes a plurality of internal cooling air passages 48 for the passage of cooling air through the blade. In the conventional manner the flow passes serially through a number of these passages and exits through cooling holes in the blade structure. The damper 28 is located in one of these cooling flow paths. It is noted that this damper is sufficiently small that it may be installed without blockage of more than 25% of the passage on which it is located. This permits the use of the damper in an air cooled blade without unduly restricting the air cooling thereof.
Flexural vibration of the blade is damped by longitudinal friction and slippage between the damper and the blade surface. Local micro-slipping will occur, with micro-slipping varying from a minimum near the damper support point to a maximum at the damper end.
Support of the damper is not really required for the damping action itself It is required to locate the damper. Support at an inboard location in the blade is preferred. Support at an outboard location requires a stiffer damper, since the centrifugal force tends to buckle the damper.
El-Aini, Yehia M., Stoner, Alan W., Wiebe, David
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10151204, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil including loose damper |
10442531, | Aug 18 2015 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Rotor damping |
10500633, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Gas turbine engine airfoil impingement cooling |
10577940, | Jan 31 2017 | GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC | Turbomachine rotor blade |
10697303, | Apr 23 2013 | RTX CORPORATION | Internally damped airfoiled component and method |
10724376, | Feb 08 2018 | General Electric Company | Airfoil having integral fins |
10774653, | Dec 11 2018 | RTX CORPORATION | Composite gas turbine engine component with lattice structure |
10830067, | Mar 16 2018 | General Electric Company | Mechanical airfoil morphing with internal mechanical structures |
10914320, | Jan 24 2014 | RTX CORPORATION | Additive manufacturing process grown integrated torsional damper mechanism in gas turbine engine blade |
11143036, | Aug 20 2020 | GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC | Turbine blade with friction and impact vibration damping elements |
11168568, | Dec 11 2018 | RTX CORPORATION | Composite gas turbine engine component with lattice |
11371358, | Feb 19 2020 | GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC | Turbine damper |
11536144, | Sep 30 2020 | GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC | Rotor blade damping structures |
11668197, | Apr 23 2013 | RTX CORPORATION | Internally damped airfoiled component |
11739645, | Sep 30 2020 | GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC | Vibrational dampening elements |
11773725, | Feb 19 2020 | GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC | Turbine damper |
5558497, | Jul 31 1995 | United Technologies Corporation | Airfoil vibration damping device |
5820343, | Jul 31 1995 | United Technologies Corporation | Airfoil vibration damping device |
6676380, | Apr 11 2002 | Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc | Turbine blade assembly with pin dampers |
6685435, | Apr 26 2002 | Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc | Turbine blade assembly with stranded wire cable dampers |
6699015, | Feb 19 2002 | Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc | Blades having coolant channels lined with a shape memory alloy and an associated fabrication method |
6752594, | Feb 07 2002 | Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc | Split blade frictional damper |
6886622, | Feb 19 2002 | Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc | Method of fabricating a shape memory alloy damped structure |
7270517, | Oct 06 2005 | SIEMENS ENERGY, INC | Turbine blade with vibration damper |
7278830, | May 18 2005 | Allison Advanced Development Company, Inc. | Composite filled gas turbine engine blade with gas film damper |
7413405, | Jun 14 2005 | General Electric Company | Bipedal damper turbine blade |
7736124, | Apr 10 2007 | General Electric Company | Damper configured turbine blade |
7806410, | Feb 20 2007 | RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION | Damping device for a stationary labyrinth seal |
7811063, | Nov 03 2006 | General Electric Company | Damping element for a wind turbine rotor blade |
7824158, | Jun 25 2007 | General Electric Company | Bimaterial turbine blade damper |
8105039, | Apr 01 2011 | Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc | Airfoil tip shroud damper |
8123489, | May 23 2007 | Rolls-Royce plc | Hollow aerofoil and a method of manufacturing a hollow aerofoil |
8225506, | Jul 13 2007 | Rolls-Royce plc | Method of manufacturing a rotor for a gas turbine engine that includes identifying the frequency response of the rotor and adjusting the frequency response by providing a pressure gradient within the rotor |
8267662, | Dec 13 2007 | General Electric Company | Monolithic and bi-metallic turbine blade dampers and method of manufacture |
8915718, | Apr 24 2012 | RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION | Airfoil including damper member |
9074482, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil support method and apparatus |
9121286, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil having tapered buttress |
9121288, | May 04 2012 | Siemens Energy, Inc. | Turbine blade with tuned damping structure |
9133712, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Blade having porous, abradable element |
9175570, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil including member connected by articulated joint |
9181806, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil with powder damper |
9243502, | Apr 24 2012 | RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION | Airfoil cooling enhancement and method of making the same |
9249668, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil with break-way, free-floating damper member |
9267380, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil including loose damper |
9296039, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Gas turbine engine airfoil impingement cooling |
9404369, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil having minimum distance ribs |
9470095, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil having internal lattice network |
9879559, | Apr 24 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoils having porous abradable elements |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2689107, | |||
2809802, | |||
2920868, | |||
2984453, | |||
3027138, | |||
5056738, | Sep 07 1989 | General Electric Company | Damper assembly for a strut in a jet propulsion engine |
CA535074, | |||
FR1007303, | |||
FR981599, | |||
SU641129, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 02 1991 | STONER, ALAN W | United Technologies Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005713 | /0921 | |
May 02 1991 | EL-AINI, YEHIA M | United Technologies Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005713 | /0921 | |
May 02 1991 | WIEBE, DAVID | United Technologies Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005713 | /0921 | |
May 20 1991 | United Technologies Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 17 1996 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 17 2000 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Apr 17 2000 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
May 24 2004 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 24 1995 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 24 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 24 1996 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 24 1998 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 24 1999 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 24 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 24 2000 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 24 2002 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 24 2003 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 24 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 24 2004 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 24 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |