Improved creping compositions comprising glyoxylated vinylamide polymers in combination with polyvinyl alcohol are disclosed.

Patent
   5179150
Priority
Oct 07 1991
Filed
Oct 07 1991
Issued
Jan 12 1993
Expiry
Oct 07 2011
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
29
5
all paid
1. A creping composition for creping cellulosic webs comprising:
a) from 5 to 75 weight per-cent of a water ,soluble vinylamide polymer having sufficient amide and glyoxal substituents to be thermosetting, the ratio of the number of glyoxal substituents to the number of amide substituents being in excess of 0.06:1 and
b) from 25 to 95 per-cent by weight of polyvinyl alcohol.
2. The creping adhesive composition of claim 1 where the water soluble vinyl amide polymer is a cationic water soluble polymer.
3. The creping adhesive composition of claim 2 where the cationic water soluble copolymer has a molar ratio of 95% acrylamide and 5% diallydimethyl ammonium chloride.
4. The creping adhesive of claim 1 where (b) is present in an amount ranging from 70-95% by weight.
5. A method for creping cellulosic webs comprising:
a) Applying to a rotating creping cylinder a dilute aqueous solution of the composition of claim 1.
b) Pressing a cellulosic web against the creping cylinder to effect adhesion of the web to the surface of the cylinder; and
c) Dislodging the web from the creping cylinder by contact with a doctor blade.
6. The method of claim 5 where the composition is of claim 2.
7. The method of claim 5 where the composition is of claim 1.
8. The method of claim 5 where the composition is of claim 3.
9. The method of claim 5 where the composition is of claim 4.

The invention comprises adhesive compositions which show good utility when used in the tissue manufacturing process as Yankee dryer coating agents. The adhesive compositions consist of a mixture of water soluble polyvinyl alcohols and glyoxylatedvinyl amide polymers.

In the tissue manufacturing process, the paper sheet is dried by means of a steam heated drying cylinder, termed a Yankee. Adhesive materials are used to coat the Yankee surface in order to adhere the wet sheet to the dryer. This improves heat transfer, allowing more efficient drying of the sheet, and most importantly provides the required adhesion to give good creping of the dry sheet. Creping is the process of impacting the sheet into a metal blade, thus compressing the sheet in the machine direction, creating a folded sheet structure. Creping breaks a large number of fiber-to-fiber bonds in the sheet, imparting the qualities of bulk, stretch, absorbency, and softness which are characteristic of tissue. The amount of adhesion provided by the coating adhesive plays a significant role in the development of these tissue properties.

The Yankee coating also serves the purpose of protecting the Yankee and creping blade surfaces from excessive wear. In this role, the coating agents provide improved runability of the tissue machine. As creping blades wear, they must be replaced with new ones. This replacement process represents a significant source of tissue machine downtime, or lost production, as creped product cannot be produced when the blade is being changed. Also a problem, especially with the poly(aminoamide)-epichlorohydrin type creping adhesives is the phenomenon of coating buildup. Resins of this type are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,926,116 and 3,058,873 the disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference. This problem is evidenced by high spots in the coating, which cause chattering, or bouncing of the crepe blade, against the coated Yankee surface. Blade chatter results in portions of the sheet traveling underneath the crepe blade, causing picks or holes in the sheet. This can lead to sheet breaks and machine downtime.

It is the object of this invention to disclose creping adhesive compositions which provide both improved adhesion and improved machine runability over other adhesive compositions known in the art.

FIG. 1 compares the composition of the invention versus the prior art.

FIG. 2 provides similar data and it shows the ability of the composition of the invention to resist adhesion buildup.

FIG. 3 provides additional data showing the ability of the composition of this invention to resist adhesion buildup.

The invention comprises a creping adhesive composition for creping cellulosic webs. It comprises:

a) from 5 to 75 weight per-cent on an active polymer basis of a water soluble vinylamide polymer having sufficient amide substituents and glyoxal substituents to be thermosetting, the ratio of the number of glyoxal substituents to the number of amide substituents being in excess of 0.06:1 and

b) from 25 to 95 per-cent by weight of polyvinyl alcohol.

These polymers are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 3,556,932, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. These polymers are water soluble polyvinyl amides, having sufficient -CHOHCHO glyoxal substituents to be thermosetting.

As indicated in 3,556,932 the polymers may contain an ionic component in sufficient quantity to render them substantive to cellulose fibers in aqueous suspensions. The amount of ionic groupings in these polymers is usually small, e.g., less than 10 mole per-cent, but may be as high as 50 mole per-cent. On a weight basis of the active backbone polymer, the glyoxal is added in amounts ranging from 1.0 to 30.0 weight per-cent. For more specificity in respect to minimum amounts of ionic groupings necessary to produce the thermosetting resins, reference should again be had to the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 3,556,932.

The most preferred polymer is one that is formed by reacting at a temperature of at least 25°C, and as high as from 50°-100°C, an acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer containing approximately 95 mole per cent acrylamide and five mole per-cent DADMAC and having a weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 25,000 with glyoxal. The glyoxal is added to the base polymer at a weight ratio, based on active backbone polymer. This preferred Yankee Dryer adhesive comprises a copolymer of acrylamide and diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride containing from about 2.0 to about 10.0 mole per-cent DADMAC and having the molecular weight cited above. This DADMAC copolymer is reacted with from about 1.0 to about 30 weight per cent of the glyoxal, based on (active) backbone polymer.

The method of producing these polymers also is described in further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 3,556,932. The glyoxylated polymers are provided as aqueous solutions of 6-10% active material.

The hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohols having utility in the invention are those which are water soluble, having a molecular weight up to about 186,000. Such are exemplified by partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohols marketed by the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Per Air Products brochure No. 152-8904, Airvol 540 is reported as having an average molecular weight between 124,000-186,000, is 87 to 89% hydrolyzed and exhibits a viscosity as a 4% aqueous solution of 40-50 centipoises. Airvol 425 is reported as having an average molecular weight between 85,000-146,000 is 95.5-96.5% hydrolyzed and exhibits a viscosity of 25-29 centipoises. In addition to the above described polyvinyl alcohols, others having utility in the invention are described in the book entitled Polyvinyl Alcohol by C. Finch, John Wyley and Sons (New York, 1973).

The compositions contain about 25 to 95 weight percent, preferably from about 50 to 87.5 weight percent, and most preferably about 75 weight per-cent, of polyvinyl alcohol. The balance of the compositions is, of course, the active glyoxylated vinyl-amide polymer.

The application of the compositions of the invention to Yankee dryers is a three step process comprising:

a) Applying to the surface of a creping cylinder an aqueous admixture of compositions of the invention previously described;

b) Adhering a cellulosic web to the creping cylinder by the above said mixture and;

c) Dislodging the adhered web from the creping cylinder with a doctor blade.

The compositions of the invention are utilized in the forms of dilute aqueous solutions. Preferably, the dilute aqueous admixture of the compositions used to coat the Yankee contains from about 0.05 to about 4 weight per-cent solids, most preferably about 0.1 weight per solids. Those skilled in the art of creping adhesives will appreciate that the reason for such a large percentage of water in the admixture is in part the need to only deposit a very thin layer of adhesive on the creping cylinder, which is most easily accomplished with a spray boom.

The benefits of the current invention will become evident from the following examples. Examples 1 and 2 deal with the improved adhesion of these compounds.

The relative adhesion of creping adhesive compositions was measured by means of a peel test. In the test procedure, a paper sample was attached to a metal panel with the adhesive of interest, and peeled at an angle of 90°. The paper substrate used in the test was a filter grade paper. This paper had a basis weight of 78 g/m2. The metal panels, to which the paper was adhered, are standardized test panels produced from low carbon steel and supplied with a smooth finish (surface roughness of 0.2-0.3 μm).

In the procedure, a 76 μm film of the adhesive was uniformly applied to a steel test panel by means of an applicator. The paper test strip was carefully applied to the film and rolled once with a weighted roller to achieve uniform contact between the paper, adhesive, and metal panel. The panel with attached paper strip was then mounted on the peel testing apparatus, the surface of which was controlled to a temperature of 100°C When the sample was stabilized at this temperature, the paper strip was peeled from the panel and the average force needed to accomplish the separation was recorded. The strip was peeled from the panel at a constant effective speed of 43 cm/min.

Table 1 provides data which shows the increased adhesion of the blended components of this invention compared to prior adhesive combinations known in the art. In particular, Table 1 shows the adhesion found for polyvinyl alcohol (PVA; Airvol 540) in combination with Kymene 557H and Rezesol 8223 [poly(aminoamide)-epichlorohydrin resins], compared to PVA in combination with a glyoxylated-poly(acrylamide/DADMAC) resin. The PVA was a commercial product obtained from Air Products, whereas Kymene 557H and Rezosol 8223 are available from Hercules and E. F. Houghton, respectively. It can be clearly seen that the combination of glyoxylated-poly(acrylamide/DADMAC) with PVA resulted in stronger adhesion, than that which could be obtained with the poly (aminomaide)-epichlorohydrin resins, such as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,640. The increased adhesion occurred even with as little as 10% glyoxylated-poly(acrylamide/DADMAC) resin.

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Peel Adhesion at 1% Total Actives.
% of Total Actives
Glyoxylated-
Average
Airvol Kymene Rezosol
poly(AMD/
Adhesion
Sample
540 557H 8223 DADMAC) (g/in)
______________________________________
1 100 -- -- -- 20.6 ± 4.6
2 -- 100 -- -- NA
3 -- -- 100 -- NA
4 -- -- -- 100 89.2 ± 9.1
5 75 25 -- -- 14.9 ± 2.8
6 25 75 -- -- NA
7 75 -- 25 -- 15.5 ± 3.0
8 25 -- 75 -- NA
9 90 -- -- 10 40.4 ± 7.0
10 80 -- -- 20 39.5 ± 6.4
11 75 -- -- 25 36.1 ± 5.2
12 25 -- -- 75 53.7 ± 15.0
______________________________________
NA = No Adhesion

Table 2 provides similar data for an additional PVA, of higher degree of hydrolysis and lower molecular weight, and also for a cationic potato starch (Solvitose N; from AVEBE America, Inc.). Values cannot be compared directly with those in Table 1 due to different methods used to collect and analyze the raw peel data. In general, the method used in Table 2 gives lower values than that used in Table 1. When blended with the PVA and starch components, the glyoxylated-poly(acrylamide/DADMAC) resin again provided improved adhesion over the single components.

TABLE 2
______________________________________
Peel Adhesion at 1% Total Actives.
% of Total Actives Average
Airvol Cationic Glyoxylated- Adhesion
Sample
425 Starch poly(AMD/DADMAC)
(g/in)
______________________________________
1 100 -- -- 17.3 ± 3.6
2 -- 100 -- 14.9 ± 3.3
3 -- -- 100 75.5 ± 6.4
4 50 -- 50 55.0 ± 2.3
5 33.3 33.3 33.3 21.8 ± 1.4
______________________________________

The following examples detail the improved runnability obtained from the compositions of this invention.

In this example a laboratory device was used to simulate the creping process. The laboratory device, or lab Yankee, consisted of an internally heated cast iron cylinder, approximately 8 in. in diameter ×4 in. wide. The cylinder was equipped with a creping blade and torque sensing device. In normal operation, the lab Yankee was run at a surface temperature of 95°C, a speed of 1 rpm and a crepe blade pressure of 6.5 pli. A preformed, dried paper test strip was saturated with dilute adhesive solution, pressed against the cylinder, dried, and creped off.

Three torque measurements were recorded, with the blade against the cylinder. The torque measurement, t1, was recorded against the clean cylinder, before the paper test strip was applied, and represented the baseline torque value. The value, T, was recorded when the test strip was creped from the cylinder, and relates to the relative resistance of removing the strip from the Yankee cylinder. Finally, the value, t2, was recorded following the removal of the test strip,, and was taken as a relative measure of the adhesive residue left on the cylinder. The calculated values, T-t2 and t2 -t1 were then taken as relative measures, respectively of the adhesion of the paper to the Yankee cylinder, and the presence of residual adhesive left on the cylinder. An increase in T-t2 was interpreted as positive since this would indicate increased adhesion, and should lead to improved sheet properties. Oppositely, an increase in t2 -t1 was seen as negative, since this increase in t2 -t1 can be interpreted as related to an adhesive buildup on the Yankee. In commercial practice, adhesive buildup is not desirable as it eventually leads to crepe blade "chatter" and subsequently poor creping and sheet quality due to picking.

FIG. 1 shows data comparing these values for the glyoxylated-poly(acrylamide/DADMAC): [5 mole % DADMAC, 30 Wt. % glyoxal to backbone polymer; shown as Composition 1], Kymene 557H, Rezosol 8223, and PVA. In comparing these results, composition 1, provided the highest adhesion, or highest "T" value. On the other hand, the PVA had the least detrimental effect, in terms of adhesive buildup, and in fact created a "lubricating" effect (negative t2 -t1)

FIG. 2 provides similar data for the adhesive combined with PVA (66.6% adhesive/33.3% PVA). In this experiment, the composition 1-PVA combination provided the highest adhesion with no residual adhesive buildup.

FIG. 3 provides additional evidence as to the desirability of the PVA/Composition 1 combination in terms of resisting adhesive buildup. In FIG. 3, twenty consecutive test were performed with no cleaning of the Yankee cylinder between tests. As can be seen, the t2 values of the individual adhesives, increased with successive tests, indicating an adhesive buildup. The t2 value for the PVA adhesive, by itself, remained constant. The combination of PVA and the Houghton 8223 poly(aminoamide)epichlorohydrin polymer increased in t2 value, also indicating adhesive buildup. The PVA Composition 1 combination provided the strongest adhesion and the t2 values remained unchanged after twenty tests. This indicated little tendency for the adhesive to build up, and was interpreted as leading to improved runability of the tissue machine.

The compositions of this invention were trialed on a pilot tissue machine. This machine had a trim of 24" and was run at a wire speed of 3500 ft/min. Tissue was produced from a 50/50 furnish blend of SSWK/SHWK at a basis weight of 9.6 lb/3000 ft2. The sheet was creped at a moisture content of 4% and a crepe ratio of 18%. Adhesive materials of this invention were sprayed directly on the Yankee dryer at the rate of 0.4 dry lb. adhesive/ton product. A hydrocarbon release oil was also sprayed on the Yankee at the rate of 1-3 lb/ton. Adhesive compositions utilized had a range from 87.5 to 25% PVA with the rest of the blend consisting of glyoxylated-poly (acrylamide/DADMAC). However, the best runability, as determined by visual observation, occurred in the range from 87.5 to 75% PVA. In this range, no coating buildup was observed, and no picking of the sheet at the crepe blade occurred.

Furman, Jr., Gary S., Van Luu, Phuong, Gruen, Craig

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10604896, Oct 20 2011 Ecolab USA Inc Method for early warning chatter detection and asset protection management
10648133, May 13 2016 ECOLAB USA , INC Tissue dust reduction
11041271, Oct 24 2017 Ecolab USA Inc. Deposit detection in a paper making system via vibration analysis
11053641, Mar 22 2018 Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. Modified creping adhesive formulation and creping methods using same
5374334, Dec 06 1993 Ecolab USA Inc Class of polymeric adhesives for yankee dryer applications
5382323, Jan 08 1993 Ecolab USA Inc Cross-linked poly(aminoamides) as yankee dryer adhesives
5468796, Aug 17 1994 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc Creeping chemical composition and method of use
5490903, Aug 17 1994 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc Creping chemical composition and method of use
5869589, Jul 17 1997 Eastman Chemical Company Self-crosslinking aqueous dispersions
5919716, Sep 18 1996 Eastman Chemical Company Self-crosslinking aqueous dispersions
5942085, Dec 22 1997 The Procter & Gamble Company; Procter & Gamble Company, The Process for producing creped paper products
6048938, Dec 22 1997 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for producing creped paper products and creping aid for use therewith
6133405, Jul 10 1997 SOLENIS TECHNOLOGIES, L P Polyalkanolamide tackifying resins for creping adhesives
6187138, Mar 17 1998 The Procter & Gamble Company; Procter & Gamble Company, The Method for creping paper
6214932, Dec 29 1998 SOLENIS TECHNOLOGIES, L P Creping adhesives obtained by the reaction of polyamide and polyvinylalcohol with epichlorohydrin
6280571, Aug 17 1998 SOLENIS TECHNOLOGIES, L P Stabilizer for creping adhesives
6991707, Jun 05 2001 BUCKMAN LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC Polymeric creping adhesives and creping methods using same
7404875, Apr 28 2004 GPCP IP HOLDINGS LLC Modified creping adhesive composition and method of use thereof
7589153, May 25 2005 Ecolab USA Inc Glyoxalated inter-copolymers with high and adjustable charge density
7863395, Dec 20 2006 Ecolab USA Inc Polyacrylamide-based strengthening agent
8101045, Jan 05 2010 Nalco Company Modifying agent for yankee coatings
8246781, May 20 2010 Ecolab USA Inc Thermosetting creping adhesive with reactive modifiers
8568562, Aug 01 2011 Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. Creping methods using pH-modified creping adhesive compositions
8753478, Dec 29 2005 Ecolab USA Inc Creping adhesives comprising blends of high and low molecular weight resins
8958898, Nov 07 2011 Nalco Company Method and apparatus to monitor and control sheet characteristics on a creping process
9404895, Oct 20 2011 Ecolab USA Inc Method for early warning chatter detection and asset protection management
9611590, Nov 07 2013 Ecolab USA Inc Creping adhesives and methods for making and using same
9851199, Nov 07 2011 Ecolab USA Inc Method and apparatus to monitor and control sheet characteristics on a creping process
9976259, Dec 10 2013 Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. Adhesive formulation and creping methods using same
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3556932,
3926716,
4304625, Nov 13 1979 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc Creping adhesives for through-dried tissue
4448638, Aug 29 1980 JAMES RIVER PAPER COMPANY, INC , A CORP OF VA Paper webs having high bulk and absorbency and process and apparatus for producing the same
4501640, Oct 18 1983 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc Creping adhesives containing polyvinyl alcohol and cationic polyamide resins
//////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Sep 16 1991LUU, PHUONG VANNALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY A DE CORPORATIONASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0058950675 pdf
Sep 16 1991FURMAN, GARY S , JR NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY A DE CORPORATIONASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0058950675 pdf
Sep 19 1991GRUEN, CRAIGNALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY A DE CORPORATIONASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0058950675 pdf
Oct 07 1991Nalco Chemical Company(assignment on the face of the patent)
Mar 19 2001Nalco Chemical CompanyOndeo Nalco CompanyCHANGE OF NAME & ADDRESS0130110582 pdf
Nov 04 2003Ondeo Nalco CompanyNalco CompanyCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0176060777 pdf
Nov 04 2003Nalco CompanyCITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST0148050132 pdf
Nov 04 2003Ondeo Nalco CompanyNalco CompanyGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST0148220305 pdf
May 13 2009CALGON LLCBANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0227030001 pdf
May 13 2009NALCO ONE SOURCE LLCBANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0227030001 pdf
May 13 2009NALCO CROSSBOW WATER LLCBANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0227030001 pdf
May 13 2009Nalco CompanyBANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0227030001 pdf
Dec 01 2011BANK OF AMERICA, N A Nalco CompanyRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0418080713 pdf
Dec 29 2015Nalco CompanyNalco Company LLCCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0418350903 pdf
Feb 27 2017CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC Nalco CompanyRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0418320826 pdf
Feb 27 2017ONDEO NALCO ENERGY SERVICES, L P Ecolab USA IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0418360437 pdf
Feb 27 2017Nalco Company LLCEcolab USA IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0418360437 pdf
Feb 27 2017Calgon CorporationEcolab USA IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0418360437 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
May 24 1994ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Mar 20 1996RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Jul 11 1996M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 24 1996ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Jul 11 2000M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 12 2004M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jan 12 19964 years fee payment window open
Jul 12 19966 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 12 1997patent expiry (for year 4)
Jan 12 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jan 12 20008 years fee payment window open
Jul 12 20006 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 12 2001patent expiry (for year 8)
Jan 12 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jan 12 200412 years fee payment window open
Jul 12 20046 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 12 2005patent expiry (for year 12)
Jan 12 20072 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)