This invention relates to a process for producing a rare earth-containing powder comprising crushing a rare earth-containing alloy in water, drying the crushed alloy material at a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material, and treating the crushed alloy material with a passivating gas at a temperature from the ambient temperature to a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material. Rare earth-containing alloys suitable for use in producing magnets utilizing the powder metallurgy technique, such as Nd-Fe-B and Sm-Co alloys, can be used. The passivating gas can be nitrogen, carbon dioxide or a combination of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. If nitrogen is used as the passivating gas, the resultant powder has a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent. Moreover, if carbon dioxide is used as the passivating gas, the resultant powder has a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent. The present invention further relates to the production of a permanent magnet comprising the above steps for producing the rare earth-containing powder, and then compacting the powder, sintering the compacted material at a temperature of from about 900°C to about 1200°C, and heat treating the sintered material at a temperature of from about 200°C to about 1050°C

Patent
   5180445
Priority
Jun 13 1989
Filed
Jun 27 1991
Issued
Jan 19 1993
Expiry
Jan 19 2010
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
2
6
all paid
4. A non-pyrophoric rare earth-containing powder comprising, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected form the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 52% iron, and further having a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent, wherein said powder has a higher concentration of carbon in the surface region than in the center of the powder.
1. A non-pyrophoric rare earth-containing powder comprising, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected form the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 25% iron, and further having a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent, wherein said powder has a higher concentration of nitrogen in the surface region than in the center of the powder.
7. A non-pyrophoric rare earth-containing powder comprising, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 52% iron, and further having a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent and a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent, wherein said powder has higher concentrations of nitrogen and carbon in the surface region than in the center of the powder.
2. The powder of claim 1 wherein the rare earth element is neodymium and/or praseodymium.
3. The powder of claim 1 wherein the nitrogen surface concentration is from 0.4 to 10.8 atomic percent.
5. The powder of claim 4 wherein the rare earth element is neodymium and/or praseodymium.
6. The powder of claim 4 wherein the carbon surface concentration is from 0.5 to 6.5 atomic percent.
8. The powder of claim 2 wherein the rare earth element is neodymium and/or praseodymium.
9. The powder of claim 7 wherein the nitrogen surface concentration is from 0.4 to 10.8 atomic percent.
10. The powder of claim 7 wherein the carbon surface concentration is from 0.5 to 6.5 atomic percent.
11. The powder of claim 7 wherein the nitrogen surface concentration is from 0.4 to 10.8 atomic percent and the carbon surface concentration is from 0.5 to 6.5 atomic percent.

This is a divisional of co-pending application Ser. No. 07/365,622 filed on Jun. 13, 1989 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,114,502.

1. Field of the Invention

This invention generally relates to magnetic materials and, more particularly, to rare earth-containing powders and permanent magnets, and a process for producing the same.

2. Description of the Prior Art

Permanent magnet materials currently in use include alnico, hard ferrite and rare earth/cobalt magnets. Recently, new magnetic materials have been introduced containing iron, various rare earth elements and boron. Such magnets have been prepared from melt quenched ribbons and also by the powder metallurgy technique of compacting and sintering, which was previously employed to produce samarium cobalt magnets.

Suggestions of the prior art for rare earth permanent magnets and processes for producing the same include: U.S. Pat. No. 4,597,938, Matsuura et al., which discloses a process for producing permanent magnet materials of the Fe-B-R type by: preparing a metallic powder having a mean particle size of 0.3-80 microns and a composition consisting essentially of, in atomic percent, 8-30% R representing at least one of the rare earth elements inclusive of Y, 2 to 28% B and the balance Fe; compacting; and sintering the resultant body at a temperature of 900°-1200°C in a reducing or non-oxidizing atmosphere. Co up to 50 atomic percent may be present. Additional elements M (Ti, Ni, Bi, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Al, Sb, Ge, Sn, Zr, Hf) may be present. The process is applicable for anisotropic and isotropic magnet materials. Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 4,684,406, Matsuura et al., discloses a certain sintered permanent magnet material of the Fe-B-R type, which is prepared by the aforesaid process.

Also, U.S. Pat. No. 4,601,875, Yamamoto et al., teaches permanent magnet materials of the Fe-B-R type produced by: preparing a metallic powder having a mean particle size of 0.3-80 microns and a composition of, in atomic percent, 8-30% R representing at least one of the rare earth elements inclusive of Y, 2-28% B and the balance Fe; compacting; sintering at a temperature of 900°-1200°C; and, thereafter, subjecting the sintered bodies to heat treatment at a temperature lying between the sintering temperature and 350°C Co and additional elements M (Ti, Ni, Bi, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Al, Sb, Ge, Sn, Zr, Hf) may be present. Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 4,802,931, Croat, discloses an alloy with hard magnetic properties having the basic formula RE1-x (TM1-y By)x. In this formula, RE represents one or more rare earth elements including scandium and yttrium in Group IIIA of the periodic table and the elements from atomic number 57 (lanthanum) through 71 (lutetium). TM in this formula represents a transition metal taken from the group consisting of iron or iron mixed with cobalt, or iron and small amounts of other metals such as nickel, chromium or manganese.

However, prior art attempts to manufacture permanent magnets utilizing powder metallurgy technology have suffered from substantial shortcomings. For example, crushing is typically carried out in a crushing apparatus using an organic liquid in a gas environment. This liquid may be, for example, hexane, petroleum ether, glycerin, methanol, toluene, or other suitable liquid. A special liquid environment is utilized since the powder produced during crushing is rare earth metal based and, accordingly, the powder is chemically active, pyrophoric and readily oxidizable. However, the aforementioned liquids are relatively costly and pose a potential health hazard due to their toxicity and flammability. Furthermore, crushing an alloy mass to make suitable powder in the aforementioned environment is also disadvantageous since the powder produced has a high density of certain defects in the crystal structure which adversely affect the magnetic properties. Additionally, crushing in the organic liquid environment unduly complicates the attainment of the desired shape, size, structure, magnetic field orientation and magnetic properties of the powders and resultant magnets since the organic liquid environments have a relatively high viscosity which interferes with achieving the desired results. Moreover, attempts to passivate the surfaces of the powder particles by coating them with a protective substance, such as a resin, nickel or the like, during and after crushing is a generally ineffective and complicated process which increases the cost of manufacturing.

This invention relates to a process for producing a rare earth-containing powder comprising crushing an alloy in water, drying the crushed alloy material at a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material, and treating the crushed alloy material with a passivating gas at a temperature from the ambient temperature to a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material. The alloy can comprise, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and the balance iron. Other rare earth-containing alloys suitable for use in producing permanent magnets utilizing the powder metallurgy technique, such as samarium cobalt alloy, can also be used.

The alloys are crushed in water to a particle size of from about 0.05 microns to about 100 microns and, preferably, to a particle size of from 1 micron to 40 microns. The crushed alloy material can be vacuum dried or dried with an inert gas, such as argon or helium. The passivating gas can be nitrogen, carbon dioxide or a combination of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. If nitrogen is used as the passivating gas, the resultant powder has a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent. Moreover, if carbon dioxide is used as the passivating gas, the resultant powder has a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent. The rare earth-containing powder produced in accordance with the present invention is non-pyrophoric and resistant to oxidation. Furthermore, the excellent properties displayed by the powders of this invention make them suitable for use in producing magnets, such as bonded or pressed magnets.

The present invention further relates to the production of an improved permanent magnet comprising the steps for producing the rare earth-containing powder set forth above and then compacting the crushed alloy material, sintering the compacted alloy material at a temperature of from about 900°C to about 1200°C, and heat treating the sintered material at a temperature of from about 200°C to about 1050°C The improved permanent magnet in accordance with the present invention includes the type of magnet comprised of, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from 12% to 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 52% iron, wherein the improvement comprises a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent. The improved permanent magnet can also have a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent if carbon dioxide is used as a passivating gas. These improved permanent magnets have a high resistance to corrosion and superior magnetic properties.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide processes for producing rare earth-containing powder which is resistant to oxidation and is non-pyrophoric. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a safe and economically effective process for producing rare earth-containing powder and magnets. It is also an object of the present invention to provide improved permanent magnets having high resistance to corrosion and superior magnetic properties. These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reference to the following description of the preferred embodiments.

FIG. 1 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:16 and grinding time of 30 minutes.

FIG. 2 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:16 and grinding time of 60 minutes.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:16 and grinding time of 90 minutes.

FIG. 4 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:16 and grinding time of 120 minutes.

FIG. 5 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:24 and grinding time of 15 minutes.

FIG. 6 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:24 and grinding time of 30 minutes.

FIG. 7 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:24 and grinding time of 60 minutes.

FIG. 8 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:24 and grinding time of 90 minutes.

FIG. 9 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:32 and grinding time of 15 minutes.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:32 and grinding time of 30 minutes.

FIG. 11 is a graph showing the particle size and shape distribution for Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention with Pa /Pb of 1:32 and grinding time of 60 minutes.

FIG. 12 is a photomicrograph at 650× magnification of Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention and oriented in a magnetic field.

FIG. 13 is a photomicrograph at 1,600× magnification of Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a photomicrograph at 1,100× magnification of Nd-Fe-B powder produced by conventional powder metallurgy technique and oriented in a magnetic field.

FIG. 15 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 16 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of Nd-Fe-B powder produced by conventional powder metallurgy technique.

FIG. 17 is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis and comparing a conventional Nd-Fe-B magnet with examples having nitrogen surface concentrations in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 18 is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis and comparing a conventional Nd-Fe-B magnet with examples having carbon surface concentrations in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 19 is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis and comparing a conventional Nd-Fe-B magnet with examples having nitrogen and carbon surface concentrations in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 20 is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis for an example having nitrogen surface concentration in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 21 is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis for an example having nitrogen surface concentration in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 22 is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis for an example having nitrogen surface concentration in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 23 is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis for a conventional Nd-Fe-B magnet example.

The present invention relates to a process for producing a rare earth-containing powder comprising: crushing a rare earth-containing alloy in water; drying the crushed alloy material at a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material; and treating the crushed alloy material with a passivating gas at a temperature from ambient temperature to a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material. The present invention further relates to a process for producing a permanent magnet comprising the above-mentioned processing steps to produce a powder and then performing the additional steps of compacting the crushed alloy material, sintering the compacted alloy material at a temperature of from about 900°C to about 1200°C, and heat treating the sintered material at a temperature of from about 200°C to about 1050°C

The first processing step of the instant invention involves placing an ingot or piece of a rare earth-containing alloy in a crushing apparatus and crushing the alloy in water. It is believed that any rare earth-containing alloy suitable for producing powders and permanent magnets by the conventional powder metallurgy method can be utilized. For example, the alloy can have a base composition of: R-Fe-B, R-Co-B, and R-(Co,Fe)-B wherein R is at least one of the rare earth metals, such as Nd-Fe-B; RCo5, R(Fe,Co)5, and RFe5, such as SmCo5 ; R2 Co17, R2 (Fe,Co)17, and R2 Fe17, such as Sm2 Co17 ; mischmetal-Co, mischmetal-Fe and mischmetal-(Co, Fe); Y-Co, Y-Fe and Y-(Co,Fe); or other similar alloys known in the art. The R-Fe-B alloy compositions disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,597,938 and 4,802,931, the texts of which are incorporated by reference herein, are particularly suitable for use in accordance with the present invention.

In one preferred embodiment, the rare earth-containing alloy comprises, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and the balance iron. Preferably, the rare earth element is neodymium and/or praseodymium. However, RM5 and R2 M17 type rare earth alloys, wherein R is at least one rare earth element selected from the group defined above and M is at least one metal selected from the group consisting of Co, Fe, Ni, and Mn may be utilized. Additional elements Cu, Ti, Bi, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Al, Sb, Ge, Sn, Zr and Hf, may also be utilized. RCo5 and R2 Co17 are preferred for this type. The alloys, as well as the powders and magnets produced therefrom in accordance with the present invention, may contain, in addition to the above-mentioned base compositions, impurities which are entrained from the industrial process of production.

The alloys are crushed in water to produce particles having a particle size of from about 0.05 microns to about 100 microns and, preferably, from 1 micron to 40 microns. Advantageously, the particle size is from 2 to 20 microns. The time required for crushing is not critical and will, of course, depend upon the efficiency of the crushing apparatus. The crushing is performed in water to prevent oxidation of the crushed alloy material. Furthermore, water has a low coefficient of viscosity and, therefore, crushing in water is more effective and faster than crushing in organic liquids presently utilized in the art. Also, crushing in water provides a higher defect density of domain wall pinning sites in the individual alloy particles, thereby providing better magnetic properties for the magnets produced from the powder. Finally, the size and shape of the individual alloy particles is optimized for compacting of the powder in a magnetic field to produce magnets. The type of water utilized is not critical. For example, distilled, deionized or non-distilled water may be utilized, but distilled is preferred.

After crushing, the crushed alloy material is then dried at a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material. More particularly, the crushed alloy material is dried thoroughly at a temperature which is sufficiently low so that phase transformation of the alloy material is not induced. The term "phase transformation temperature" as used herein means the temperature at which the stoichiometry and crystal structure of the base rare earth-containing alloy changes to a different stoichiometry and crystal structure. For example, crushed alloy material having a base composition of Nd-Fe-B will undergo phase transformation at a temperature of approximately 580°C Accordingly, the Nd-Fe-B crushed alloy material should be dried at a temperature below about 580°C However, as can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the particular phase transformation temperature necessary for the alloy material utilized will vary depending on the exact composition of the material and this temperature can be determined experimentally for each such composition.

Preferably, the wet crushed alloy material is first put in a centrifuge or other appropriate equipment for quickly removing most of the water from the material. The material can then be vacuum dried or dried with an inert gas, such as argon or helium. The crushed alloy material can be effectively dried by the flow or injection of the inert gas at a pressure below 760 torr. Nevertheless, regardless of the drying technique, the drying must be performed at a temperature below the aforementioned phase transformation temperature of the material.

Subsequently, the crushed alloy material is treated with a passivating gas at a temperature from ambient temperature to a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material. If the wet crushed material was dried in a vacuum box, then the material can be treated with the passivating gas by injecting the gas into the box. The term "passivating gas" as used herein means a gas suitable for passivation of the surface of the crushed material or powder so as to produce a thin layer on the surface of the particle powder in order to protect it from corrosion and/or oxidation. The passivating gas can be nitrogen, carbon dioxide or a combination of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. The temperature at which the powder is treated is critical and must be below the phase transformation temperature of the material. For example, the maximum temperature for treatment must be below about 580°C when a Nd-Fe-B composition is used for the material. Generally, the higher the temperature, the less the time required for treatment with the passivating gas, and the smaller the particle size of the material, the lower the temperature and the shorter the time required for treatment. Preferably, crushed alloy material of the Nd-Fe-B type is treated with the passivating gas from about one minute to about 60 minutes at a temperature from about 20°C to about 580°C and, advantageously, at a temperature of about 175° C. to 225°C

When nitrogen is used as the passivating gas in accordance with the present invention, the resultant powder has a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent and, preferably, 0.4 to 10.8 atomic percent. Furthermore, when carbon dioxide is used as the passivating gas, the resultant powder has a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent and, preferably, 0.5 to 6.5 atomic percent. When a combination of nitrogen and carbon dioxide is utilized, the resultant powder can have a nitrogen surface concentration and carbon surface concentration within the above-stated ranges.

The term "surface concentration" as used herein means the concentration of a particular element in the region extending from the surface to a depth of 25% of the distance between the center of the particle and surface. For example, the surface concentration for a particle having a size of 5 microns will be the region extending from the surface to a depth of 0.625 microns. Preferably, the region extends from the surface to a depth of 10% of the distance between the center of the particle and surface. This surface concentration can be measured by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), as can be appreciated by those skilled in the art. AES is a surface-sensitive analytical technique involving precise measurements of the number of emitted secondary electrons as a function of kinetic energy. More particularly, there is a functional dependence of the electron escape depth on the kinetic energy of the electrons in various elements. In the energy range of interest, the escape depth varies in the 2 to 10 monolayers regime. The spectral information contained in the Auger spectra are thus to a greater extent representative of the top 0.5 to 3 nm of the surface. See Metals Handbook®, Ninth Edition, Volume 10, Materials Characterization, American Society for Metals, pages 550-554 (1986), which is incorporated by reference herein.

In a preferred embodiment, the present invention further provides for an unique non-pyrophoric rare earth-containing powder comprising, an atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 52% iron, and further having a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent. Preferably, the rare earth element of the alloy powder is neodymium and/or praseodymium and the nitrogen surface concentration is from 0.4 to 10.8 atomic percent. In another preferred embodiment, the present invention provides for an unique non-pyrophoric rare earth-containing powder comprising, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from 12% to 24% of at least one rare earth element, selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 52% iron, and further having a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent. Preferably, the rare earth element is neodymium and/or praseodymium and the carbon surface concentration is from 0.5 to 6.5 atomic percent. The above-mentioned rare earth-containing powders are not only non-pyrophoric, but also resistant to oxidation and can be used to produce permanent magnets having superior magnetic properties.

The present invention further encompasses a process for producing a permanent magnet. In a preferred embodiment, this process comprises:

a) Crushing a rare earth-containing alloy in water to a particle size of from about 0.05 microns to about 100 microns, the rare earth-containing alloy comprising, in atomic percent of the overall composition, of from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and the balance iron;

b) Drying the crushed alloy material at a temperature below the phase transformation temperature of the material;

c) Treating the crushed alloy material with a passivating gas from about 1 minute to 60 minutes at a temperature of from about 20°C to 580°C;

d) Compacting the crushed alloy material;

e) Sintering the compacted alloy material at a temperature of from about 900°C to about 1200°C; and

f) Heat treating the sintered material at a temperature of from about 200°C to about 1050°C

The crushing, drying, and treating steps (steps a through c) are the same as disclosed above for producing powder. However, to produce permanent magnets, the powders are subsequently compacted, preferably at a pressure of 0.5 to 12 T/cm2. Nevertheless, the pressure for compaction is not critical. The compaction is performed in a magnetic field to produce anisotropic permanent magnets. Preferably, a magnetic field of about 7 to 15 kOe is applied in order to align the particles. Moreover, a magnetic field is not applied during compaction when producing isotropic permanent magnets. In either case, the compacted alloy material is sintered at a temperature of from about 900°C to about 1200°C and, preferably, 1000°C to 1180°C The sintered material is then heat treated at a temperature of from about 200°C to about 1050°C

When nitrogen is used as the passivating gas to treat the crushed alloy material, the resultant permanent magnet will have a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent and, preferably, 0.4 to 10.8 atomic percent. When carbon dioxide is used as the passivating gas, the resultant permanent magnet will have a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent and, preferably, from 0.5 to 6.5 atomic percent. Of course, if a combination of nitrogen and carbon dioxide is used, the surface concentrations of the respective elements will be within the above-stated ranges.

Another preferred embodiment of the present invention includes an improved permanent magnet of the type comprised of, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 52% iron, wherein the improvement comprises a nitrogen surface concentration of from about 0.4 to about 26.8 atomic percent and, preferably, from 0.4 to 10.8 atomic percent. The preferred rare earth element is neodymium and/or praseodymium. A further preferred embodiment is an improved permanent magnet of the type comprised of, in atomic percent of the overall composition, from about 12% to about 24% of at least one rare earth element selected from the group consisting of neodymium, praseodymium, lanthanum, cerium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, europium, samarium, gadolinium, promethium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, yttrium, and scandium, from about 2% to about 28% boron and at least 52% iron, wherein the improvement comprises a carbon surface concentration of from about 0.02 to about 15 atomic percent and, preferably, 0.5 to 6.5 atomic percent. The preferred rare earth element is also neodymium and/or praseodymium. The present invention is applicable to either anisotropic or isotropic permanent magnet materials, although isotropic materials have lower magnetic properties compared with the anisotropic materials.

The permanent magnets in accordance with the present invention have a high resistance to corrosion, highly developed magnetic and crystallographic texture, and high magnetic properties (coercive force, residual induction, and maximum energy product). In order to more clearly illustrate this invention, the examples set forth below are presented. The following examples are included as being illustrations of the invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope thereof.

Alloys were made by induction melting a mixture of substantially pure commercially available forms of elements to produce the following composition in weight percent: Nd - 35.2%, B - 1.2%, Dy - 0.2%, Pr - 0.4%, Mn - 0.1%, Al - 0.1% and Fe - balance. Powders and permanent magnets were then prepared from this base composition in accordance with the present invention. The alloys were crushed in distilled water, dried in vacuum and treated with a passivating gas.

FIGS. 1-11 illustrate the distribution of particle size and shape of powder for various weight ratios between powder and milling balls (Pa /Pb) and grinding times. The powder samples were oriented in a magnetic field and measurements were made on a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field. FIGS. 1-11 show that the particle size and shape of powder produced in accordance with the present invention were optimized for compacting of the powder in a magnetic field to produce magnets since the number of desired rectangular shaped particles was maximized.

FIG. 12 illustrates a distribution of particle size and shape of Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention and oriented in a magnetic field (He) as shown in the figure. FIG. 13 illustrates Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention wherein the nitrogen containing surface layer is visible. FIG. 14 illustrates Nd-Fe-B powder produced by conventional powder metallurgy technique with the powder crushed in hexane and oriented in a magnetic field (He) as shown in the figure. Corrosion is evident in the conventional powder illustrated in FIG. 14.

FIG. 15 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of Nd-Fe-B powder produced in accordance with the present invention and FIG. 16 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of Nd-Fe-B powder produced by conventional powder metallurgy technique. Comparison of FIG. 15 and FIG. 16 illustrates the difference in peak widths which indicates a higher defect density of domain wall pinning sites in the individual particles of the present invention. Comparison of FIG. 15 and FIG. 16 also illustrates the difference in peak widths which indicates a higher density of defects that nucleate domains in the individual particles of the conventional powder, which adversely affect magnetic properties.

Powders and permanent magnets were prepared from the above-mentioned base composition in accordance with the present invention and the experimental parameters, including: the weight ratio between powder and milling balls (Pa /Pb), the length of time (T) the alloys were crushed in minutes, the typical particle size range of the powder after crushing (Dp) in microns, and the temperature at which the powder was with the passivating gas (Tp) in degrees centigrade, are given below in Table I. Nitrogen was used as the passivating gas for Samples 1, 4, 7 and 10. Carbon dioxide was used as the passivating gas for Samples 2, 5, 8 and 11. A combination of nitrogen and carbon dioxide was used as the passivating gas for Samples 3, 6, 9 and 12. Sample 13 is a prior art sample made by conventional methods for comparison. FIG. 14 is a photomicrograph of Sample 13 and FIG. I6 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of Sample 13. Each powder sample was compacted, sintered and heat treated. Magnetic properties were measured, and residual induction and maximum energy product were corrected for 100% density. The magnetic properties included magnetic texture (A %-calculated), average grain size in the sintered magnet (Dg), intrinsic coercive force Hci (kOe), coercive force Hc (kOe), residual induction Br (kG), maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe), and corrosion activity. The corrosion activity was measured visually after the samples had been exposed to 100% relative humidity for about two weeks (N - no corrosion observed, A - full corrosive activity observed, and S - slight corrosive activity observed). These results are also reported in Table I below.

TABLE I
__________________________________________________________________________
Surface
Concentration
Sample T Dp
Tp
(Atomic %)
A Dg
Hci
Hc
Br
(BH)max
Corrosion
Number
Pa /Pb
(min)
(μm)
(°C.)
N C (%)
(μm)
(kOe)
(kOe)
(kG)
(MGOe)
Activity
__________________________________________________________________________
1 1:24
30 0.5-5
90
1.0 -- 98.42
12.0
12.51
10.92
11.21
31.68
N
2 1:24
30 0.5-5
115
-- 1.0 98.64
10.5
11.21
10.21
12.11
32.79
N
3 1:24
30 0.5-5
125
1.0 1.0 97.54
13.5
10.28
9.68
10.41
31.18
N
4 1:24
30 0.5-5
155
5.0 -- 98.85
10.6
10.82
10.75
11.41
32.92
N
5 1:24
30 0.5-5
150
-- 5.0 99.36
9.6
11.69
11.02
12.81
34.58
N
6 1:24
30 0.5-5
175
5.0 5.0 99.16
10.1
11.85
11.01
12.57
34.83
N
7 1:24
30 0.5-5
175
7.6 -- 99.49
8.4
11.94
11.58
13.14
37.26
N
8 1:24
30 0.5-5
195
-- 5.1 99.21
11.0
11.68
10.69
12.32
34.91
N
9 1:24
30 0.5-5
195
7.6 5.1 99.68
9.2
13.24
11.82
12.62
35.62
N
10 1:24
30 0.5-5
300
22.5
-- 94.92
16.8
6.54
4.64
5.82
2.83
S
11 1:24
30 0.5-5
340
-- 6.5 97.92
10.8
10.41
9.49
9.86
20.45
N
12 1:24
30 0.5-5
340
10.8
6.5 94.86
15.8
5.19
5.06
6.24
5.92
S
13 1:9 45 7-15
-- -- -- 98.32
13.7
13.02
10.22
10.95
27.92
A
__________________________________________________________________________

As can be seen from the results reported in Table I, the improved permanent magnets produced in accordance with the present invention exhibit superior magnetic properties. These results are further illustrated in FIG. 17 which is a graph showing the relationship between residual induction Br (kG) on the vertical axis and coercive force Hc (kOe) as well as maximum energy product (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis for Samples I, 4, 7 and 10 having nitrogen surface concentrations in accordance with the present invention, and prior art Sample 13. FIG. 18 illustrates the relationship between Br (kG) on the vertical axis and Hc (kOe) as well as (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis for Samples 2, 5, 8 and 11 having carbon surface concentrations in accordance with the present invention, and prior art Sample 13. FIG. 19 illustrates the relationship between Br (kG) on the vertical axis and Hc (kOe) as well as (BH)max (MGOe) on the horizontal axis for Samples 3, 6, 9 and 12 having both nitrogen and carbon surface concentrations in accordance with the present invention, and prior art Sample 13.

Permanent magnets were also made in accordance with this invention (Samples YB-1, YB-2 and YB-3) from powder having the following base composition in weight percent: Nd - 35.77%, B - 1.11%, Dy - 0.57%, Pr - 0.55% and Fe - balance. The powder utilized was passivated by a combination of 92% N2 and 8% CO2. These samples were analyzed for nitrogen and carbon bulk content in weight % and surface concentration in atomic %. Magnetic properties and sintered density of the samples were measured. Sample AE-1 made by conventional powder metallurgy technique was also analyzed for comparative purposes. The results are reported in Table II below.

TABLE II
______________________________________
SAMPLE NO.
YB-1 YB-2 YB-3 AE-1
______________________________________
Bulk Nitrogen
0.0550 0.0539 0.0541
0.0464
(Weight %)
Bulk Carbon
0.0756 0.0741 0.0760
0.0765
(Weight %)
Surface Nitrogen
1.5 1.5 1.5 --
(Atomic %)
Surface Carbon
* * * --
(Atomic %)
Hc 10.81 10.62 10.75 10.4
(kOe)
Br 11.59 11.31 11.37 11.2
(kG)
Hci 14.19 13.75 13.50 13.1
(kOe)
(BH)max
31.52 30.40 30.56 29.4
(MGOe)
Sintered Density
7.52 7.53 7.51 7.29
(g/cm3)
______________________________________
*Below Level of Detection of AES

Magnetic property results for Samples YB-1, YB-2, YB-3 and AE-1 are further illustrated in FIGS. 20, 21, 22, and 23 respectively.

While this invention has been described with respect to particular embodiments thereof, it is apparent that numerous other forms and modifications of this invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art. The appended claims and this invention generally should be construed to cover all such obvious forms and modifications which are within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Bogatin, Yakov

Patent Priority Assignee Title
5454998, Feb 04 1994 MNAP TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC Method for producing permanent magnet
5567891, Feb 04 1994 MNAP TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC Rare earth element-metal-hydrogen-boron permanent magnet
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4849035, Aug 11 1987 VAC MAGNETICS CORPORATION Rare earth, iron carbon permanent magnet alloys and method for producing the same
4952239, Mar 20 1986 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Magnetically anisotropic bond magnet, magnetic powder for the magnet and manufacturing method of the powder
JP60144907,
JP60254708,
JP63297504,
JP6469001,
//////////////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jun 27 1991SPS Technologies, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jan 12 2005FLEXMAG INDUSTRIES, INC DYMAS FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0156760974 pdf
Jan 12 2005Magnetic Technologies CorporationDYMAS FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0156760974 pdf
Jan 12 2005THE ARNOLD ENGINEERING CO DYMAS FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0156760974 pdf
Jan 12 2005SPS Technologies, LLCMagnetic Technologies CorporationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0156120177 pdf
Mar 07 2006Magnetic Technologies CorporationFREEPORT FINANCIAL LLC, AS AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0173030103 pdf
Mar 07 2006DYMAS FUNDING COMPANY, LLCFLEXMAG INDUSTRIES, INC , AN OHIO CORPORATIONRELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST0172860677 pdf
Mar 07 2006DYMAS FUNDING COMPANY, LLCMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATIONRELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST0172860677 pdf
Mar 07 2006DYMAS FUNDING COMPANY, LLCARNOLD ENGINEERING CO , THERELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST0172860677 pdf
May 03 2010PRECISION MAGNETICS LLCLBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010ARNOLD MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES UK, LLCLBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010ARNOLD INVESTMENTS, LTD LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010ARNOLD MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS CORPORATIONLBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010Magnetic Technologies CorporationLBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010FLEXMAG INDUSTRIES, INC LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010THE ARNOLD ENGINEERING CO LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010ARNOLD MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONLBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO REMOVE PATENT NUMBER 5180455 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024329 FRAME 0253 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREMENT 0243970650 pdf
May 03 2010FREEPORT FINANCIAL LLC, AS AGENTMagnetic Technologies CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0243200637 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTARNOLD MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES UK, LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTARNOLD INVESTMENTS, LTD RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTARNOLD MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTMagnetic Technologies CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTFLEXMAG INDUSTRIES, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTTHE ARNOLD ENGINEERING CO RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTARNOLD MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Mar 05 2012LBC CREDIT PARTNERS II, L P , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTPRECISION MAGNETICS LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0278310761 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 21 1996M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jun 27 2000M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Jun 09 2004M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 09 2004ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jan 19 19964 years fee payment window open
Jul 19 19966 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 19 1997patent expiry (for year 4)
Jan 19 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jan 19 20008 years fee payment window open
Jul 19 20006 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 19 2001patent expiry (for year 8)
Jan 19 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jan 19 200412 years fee payment window open
Jul 19 20046 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 19 2005patent expiry (for year 12)
Jan 19 20072 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)