tertiary aliphatic ethers are excellent blowing agents for the production of polyurethane foams, and can be used as replacements for CFCs, HCFCs, methylene chloride, and other known blowing agents without sacrificing good physical properties.
|
1. A process for producing a polyurethane foam, said process comprising reacting a polyol, a polyisocyanate, and water in the presence of a surfactant, a catalyst, and a blowing agent, wherein said blowing agent is a tertiary aliphatic ether.
7. A process for producing a rigid polyurethane foam, said process comprising reacting a polyol, a polyisocyanate, and water in the presence of a surfactant, a catalyst, and a blowing agent, wherein said blowing agent is a tertiary aliphatic ether.
11. A process for producing a flexible polyurethane foam, said process comprising reacting a polyol, a polyisocyanate, and water in the presence of a surfactant, a catalyst, and a blowing agent, wherein the blowing agent is a tertiary aliphatic ether.
5. The process of
6. The process of
8. The process of
9. The process of
12. The process of
13. The process of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The invention relates to the production of polyurethane foams. Methyl tert-butyl ether, a commonly used octane enhancer for gasoline, and other tertiary aliphatic ethers are useful blowing agents for making flexible, semi-rigid, and rigid foamed polyurethanes.
Foaming agents, or blowing agents, are widely used in the polyurethane industry. Although many compounds have been proposed as suitable blowing agents for polyurethane manufacture, relatively few of these are commonly used. The most widely used blowing agents have been freon (CFC-11, a chlorofluorocarbon) and dichloromethane (methylene chloride). Although freon and dichloromethane are excellent blowing agents for various polyurethane applications, there is great interest in finding replacements. CFCs are harmful to the earth's upper ozone layer, so production of these is being phased out worldwide. A small portion of the market now uses HCFCs or water instead of CFCs. Unfortunately, HCFCs are expensive and still contribute to ozone depletion. Polyurethane foams blown only with water have been developed, but good physical properties and low densities are often difficult to achieve without an auxiliary blowing agent. Formulators concerned about the toxicity of methylene chloride continue to search for satisfactory alternatives.
Diethyl ether has been listed as a blowing agent for polyurethane foams (see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,546,122 and 4,764,541), but actual examples of foams made with diethyl ether are hard to find. The flammability of diethyl ether and its high volatility have probably dissuaded those skilled in the art from actually using it.
Tertiary aliphatic ethers such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) are industrially important as an octane enhancers for gasoline. Tertiary ethers have not been previously shown to be effective blowing agents for polyurethane foams.
The invention is a process for making a polyurethane foam. In the process, a polyol, a polyisocyanate, and water react in the presence of a surfactant, catalyst and blowing agent to produce a foam. A tertiary aliphatic ether is used as the blowing agent. Tertiary aliphatic ethers are attractive alternatives to conventional blowing agents because of their relatively low cost, adequate volatility, and low potential for ozone depletion. Surprisingly, the overall physical properties of polyurethane foams made using tertiary aliphatic ethers as blowing agents are as good as or better than the properties of foams made using HCFCs or diethyl ether.
Tertiary aliphatic ethers can be used as blowing agents for making a wide variety of cellular polyurethane products, including flexible foams, semi-rigid foams, rigid foams, and microcellular elastomer foams. As is well-known to those skilled in the art, each of these types of formulations employs different types of polyisocyanates, polyols, and additives depending on the desired foam densities and required physical properties for the specific end use.
Tertiary aliphatic ethers useful in the process of the invention are preferably C4 and C5 tertiary alkyl ethers of methanol and ethanol. Examples of suitable tertiary ethers include methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), methyl tert-amyl ether (TAME), ethyl tert-amyl ether, and the like, and mixtures thereof. Other conventional blowing agents may be used in combination with the tertiary aliphatic ethers.
The polyisocyanates that can be used in the process of the invention are aromatic and aliphatic compounds that have two or more -NCO groups. Examples include, but are not limited to, toluene diisocyanates (TDI), methylene diphenylene diisocyanates (MDI), polymeric MDIs, cyclohexane diisocyanates (CHDI), hexamethylene diisocyanates, isophorone diisocyanates, and the like, and mixtures thereof.
Any polyol known for use in polyurethane foams may be used. Examples include, but are not limited to, polyoxyalkylene polyols, polymer polyols (PHD, PIPA, styrene-acrylonitrile, and the like), polytetramethylene ether glycols, sucrose-amine polyols, polyester polyols, polyacetals, polycarbonates, and the like, and mixtures thereof. Other polyfunctional active hydrogen-containing compounds, such as amine-terminated polyethers, ethylene diamine, and the like, can also be used. The polyols will typically have from 2-8 functional groups per molecule and molecular weights from about 150 to about 50,000. The most suitable polyol or polyols for any given application will obviously depend greatly upon the desired physical properties.
Water is used in the process of the invention. Water reacts with free isocyanate groups, generating carbon dioxide and amines. The amine groups react with other isocyanate groups to give urea linkages. The amount of water used is adjusted to give the desired amount of carbon dioxide (which functions as the primary or as an auxiliary blowing agent) and urea groups. Typically, the amount of water used will be within the range of about 1 to about 20 weight percent based on the amount of polyol used.
The surfactants and catalysts useful in the invention are those routinely used by those skilled in the art of polyurethane foam manufacture. The choice of a particular surfactant will depend greatly on the specific application. The catalysts useful in the invention also depend on the formulation. Generally useful catalysts include tertiary amines, tertiary amines that contain amide groups or isocyanate-reactive hydrogen atoms, alkali metal hydroxides and alkoxides, organometallic compounds (especially organotin compounds), and the like, and mixtures thereof. It is common to use more than one type of catalyst in any given formulation to adjust the rates of various reactions taking place during foaming.
Other additives are optionally used in the process of the invention. These additives, which are well known to those skilled in the art, are added for a variety of different reasons. Such additives include, but are not limited to, fillers, flame retardants, plasticizers, chain extenders, crosslinkers, dyes, cell openers, inhibitors, fungicides, and the like.
The process of the invention is performed using techniques well known in the art. If desired, for example, a one-shot process in which all of the reactants are combined in a single step can be employed. A prepolymer process can also be used.
The following examples merely illustrate the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize numerous variations that are within the spirit of the invention and scope of the claims.
The following products are used to prepare the polyurethane foams of the examples:
1. "ARCOL 6018" polyol: a sorbitol/glycerin polyether polyol blend; hydroxyl #445; product of ARCO Chemical Company
2. "ARCOL 2025" polyol: polyether diol based on PO; hydroxyl #56; product of ARCO Chemical Company
3. "ARCOL PPG-425" polyol: polyether diol based on PO; hydroxyl #265.
4. "ARCOL HPP-520" polyol: aromatic amine polyol; hydroxyl #520; product of ARCO Chemical Company
5. "Thanol SF-265" polyol: triethanolamine propoxylate; hydroxyl #635; product of Eastman Chemical Company
6. "Terol 351-I" polyol: polyester polyol; hydroxyl #350; product of Oxid, Inc.
1. "Mondur MR" polyisocyanate: polymeric MDI; product of Mobay
1. "Niax A-1" catalyst: tertiary amine catalyst; product of Union Carbide
2. "DABCO TMR-30" catalyst: phenol-formaldehyde based tertiary amine catalyst; product of Air Products
3. "Polycat 8" catalyst: dimethylcyclohexylamine; product of Air Products
4. "Hexchem 977" catalyst: potassium octoate solution; product of Mooney Chemical, Inc.
1. "DC-193" surfactant; silicone surfactant; product of Dow Corning
1. "Antiblaze 80" flame retardant; product of Albright/Wilson
1. "HCFC 141b" blowing agent; hydrogen-containing chlorofluorocarbon; product of Allied-Signal.
2. Methyl tert-butyl ether; "MTBE"; product of ARCO Chemical Company
3. Diethyl ether; obtained from J. T. Baker
PAC Preparation of Rigid Polyurethane Foams using MTBE, Diethyl Ether, and HCFC-141b as Blowing AgentsBox-pour foams (12"×8"×8", free-rise) are prepared. The B-side components (polyols, catalyst, surfactant, blowing agent, water) are premixed for 30 seconds at 2200 rpm. The isocyanate is them added, and the mixture is mixed for 30 seconds at 2200 rpm. The mixture is poured into a polyethylene-lined mold. After a 24-hour curing period, test specimens are cut from the center of the buns. Results from physical testing of the samples are summarized in Tables 1-3.
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the physical properties of the polyether-based MTBE-blown foams (Examples 1 and 4) are generally about equal to those of the HCFC-blown foams (Examples C3 and C6), and are substantially better than those of the diethyl ether-blown foams (C2 and C5). As shown in Table 1, compressive strength improves 42% in the parallel direction and 68% in the perpendicular direction when MTBE is used in place of diethyl ether (Compare Examples 1 and C2). The same effect is apparent with a different polyether-based formulation (see Table 2, Examples 4 and C5). Compressive strength increases 25% (parallel) and 68% (perpendicular) when MTBE is used vs. diethyl ether.
The improvements in compressive strength with MTBE are also seen in the less-sensitive polyester foam formulation (Table 3). Increases are 12% (parallel) and 28% (perpendicular) compared with diethyl ether, and 7% (parallel) and 50% (perpendicular) compared with the HCFC blowing agent.
| TABLE 1 |
| ______________________________________ |
| RIGID POLYURETHANE FOAM-POLYETHER POLYOLS |
| Example # 1 C2* C3* |
| ______________________________________ |
| Formulation (pbw) |
| "ARCOL 6018" polyether polyol |
| 29.4 28.2 32.1 |
| "ARCOL 2025" polyether polyol |
| 3.6 3.5 3.96 |
| Water 1.1 1.0 1.2 |
| "Niax A-1" catalyst 0.2 0.1 0.1 |
| "Polycat 8" catalyst |
| 0.5 0.5 0.6 |
| "DC-193" surfactant 0.33 0.32 0.37 |
| HCFC 141b 0 0 2.0 |
| Diethyl ether 0 2.0 0 |
| Methyl tert-butyl ether |
| 2.0 0 0 |
| "Mondur MR" polyisocyanate |
| 55.9 55.9 55.9 |
| Physical Properties |
| Density (pcf)1 1.96 1.90 2.01 |
| Compressive strength (psi), |
| 10% deform2 |
| Parallel 22.8 16.1 21.3 |
| Perpendicular 12.3 7.3 12.2 |
| ______________________________________ |
| *Comparative examples |
| 1 ASTM method D1622 |
| 2 ASTM method D1621 |
| TABLE 2 |
| ______________________________________ |
| RIGID POLYURETHANE FOAM-POLYETHER POLYOLS |
| Example # 4 C5* C6* |
| ______________________________________ |
| Formulation (pbw) |
| "ARCOL PPG-425" polyol |
| 5.87 5.87 5.87 |
| "ARCOL HPP-520" 23.5 23.5 23.5 |
| "Thanol SF-265" polyol |
| 1.55 1.55 1.55 |
| Water 0.61 0.61 0.61 |
| "Polycat 8" catalyst |
| 0.76 0.76 0.76 |
| "DC-193" surfactant 0.46 0.46 0.46 |
| "Antiblaze 80" flame retardant |
| 4.65 4.65 4.65 |
| HCFC 141b6 0 0 5.23 |
| Diethyl ether 0 2.50 0 |
| Methyl tert-butyl ether |
| 2.98 0 0 |
| "Mondur MR" polyisocyanate |
| 51.3 51.3 51.3 |
| Physical Properties |
| Density (pcf)1 |
| Parallel 1.89 1.80 1.91 |
| Perpendicular 2.03 1.96 2.06 |
| Compressive strength (psi), |
| 10% deform2 |
| Parallel 27.8 22.2 28.6 |
| Perpendicular 12.7 7.53 12.4 |
| ______________________________________ |
| *Comparative examples |
| 1 ASTM method D1622 |
| 2 ASTM method D1621 |
| TABLE 3 |
| ______________________________________ |
| RIGID POLYURETHANE FOAMS-POLYESTER POLYOL |
| Example # 7 C8* C9* |
| ______________________________________ |
| Formulation (pbw) |
| "Terol 351-I" polyester polyol |
| 25.0 25.0 25.0 |
| Water 0.43 0.42 0.43 |
| "Hexchem 977" base catalyst |
| 0.68 0.68 0.68 |
| "DABCO TMR-30" catalyst |
| 0.22 0.22 0.22 |
| "DC-193" surfactant 0.50 0.50 0.50 |
| HCFC 141b6 0 0 3.72 |
| Diethyl ether 0 1.73 0 |
| Methyl tert-butyl ether |
| 2.12 0 0 |
| "Mondur MR" polyisocyanate |
| 54.2 52.2 52.4 |
| Physical Properties |
| Density (pcf)1 |
| Parallel 2.21 2.18 1.99 |
| Perpendicular 2.28 2.31 2.11 |
| Compressive strength (psi), |
| 10% deform2 |
| Parallel 42.5 37.9 39.6 |
| Perpendicular 15.4 12.0 10.3 |
| ______________________________________ |
| *Comparative examples |
| 1 ASTM method D1622 |
| 2 ASTM method D1621 |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 5578653, | Nov 10 1994 | BASF Schwarzheide GmbH | Preparation of cellular polyurethanes |
| 5693686, | Feb 10 1994 | Bayer MaterialScience LLC | Foam-forming mixtures with decreased decomposition of hydrohalocarbon blowing agents |
| 9932083, | Jun 28 2016 | Cycle e-stem |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4535096, | Feb 27 1984 | AKZO AMERICA INC , A CORP OF DE | Polyester polyurethane foam based medical support pad |
| 4546122, | Aug 06 1984 | Mobay Chemical Corporation | Flexible polyurethane foams |
| 4596836, | Jan 14 1985 | GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, THE | Stabilizing urethanes with antioxidants |
| 4636529, | May 13 1985 | ATOCHEM NORTH AMERICA, INC , A PA CORP | Polyurethane foams from isocyanate, polyester polyol and chlorodifluoromethane |
| 4751253, | Oct 06 1986 | Method of preparing dimensionally stable, flexible urethane foam and the foam produced thereby | |
| 4764541, | Jan 29 1987 | DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE | Process for preparing polyurethane foams in the presence of a polyether acid |
| 4785027, | Jan 29 1987 | DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE | Process for preparing polyurethane foams in the presence of a polyether acid |
| 5019602, | Dec 12 1989 | LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC | Polyurethane foams, compositions to prepare same and process to prepare same |
| 5075346, | Dec 03 1990 | ARCO Chemical Technology, Inc. | Tertiary ethers as blowing agents for foam polymer systems |
| 5082868, | Jul 25 1987 | Th. Goldschmidt AG | Method for the preparation of polyurethane foams |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Dec 17 1991 | Arco Chemical Technology, L.P. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Dec 17 1991 | MOORE, H D , JR | ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 006372 | /0244 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Jul 08 1996 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Jul 23 1996 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Jul 23 1996 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
| Feb 25 2000 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Feb 25 2000 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
| Sep 19 2000 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Feb 25 2001 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Feb 23 1996 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 23 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 23 1997 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Feb 23 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Feb 23 2000 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 23 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 23 2001 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Feb 23 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Feb 23 2004 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 23 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 23 2005 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Feb 23 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |