A cable reel has first and second sets of spokes extending radially from a hub, the spokes of the first set being spaced axially of the hub from the spokes of the second set so as to snugly accommodate a monospirally-wound cable between the first and second sets. The spokes of the first set are angularly off-set from the spokes of the second set, as viewed axially of the hub, so as to accommodate a splice in the cable between the first and second sets.
|
1. A cable reel, comprising:
a hub; first and second sets of spokes extending radially from said hub; said spokes of said first set being spaced axially of said hub from said spokes of said second set so as to snugly accommodate a monospirally-wound cable between said first and second sets; and said spokes of said first set being angularly off-set from said spokes of said second set, as viewed axially of said hub, so as to accommodate a splice in the cable between said first and second sets.
2. A cable reel as claimed in
3. A cable reel as claimed in
4. A cable reel as claimed in
|
1. Field of the invention.
The present invention relates to a cable reel which is useful in particular for storing a monospirally-wound power cable.
2. Description of Related Art.
Large diameter power cables typically have a diameter of 21/2 inches and a length exceeding 2,000 ft.
Conventional cable reels for storing such a power cable are formed of a hub having first and second sets of spokes extending radially from the hub, with the first set spaced in the axial direction of the hub from the second set so as to accommodate the power cable between the first and second sets.
As viewed axially of the hub, the spokes of the first set coincide with those of the second set. Consequently, in order to accommodate between the spokes of the first and second sets any splice which may be present in the cable, the spacing of the first set from the second set, axially of the hub, is made larger than the diameter of the cable and also slightly larger than the anticipated diameter of the cable splice.
This, however, has the disadvantage that when the cable is wound on the reel, the successive turns of the cable can become off-set from one another, in the axial direction of the hub, with the result that the cable exerts lateral loads on the spokes of the reel. It is therefore necessary, in order to counteract such lateral loading of the spokes, to provide the spokes with a heavier, stronger structure than would otherwise be required.
According to the present invention, there is provided a cable reel, comprising a hub, first and second sets of spokes extending radially from the hub, the spokes of the first set being spaced axially of the hub from the spokes of the second set so as to snugly accommodate a monospirally-wound cable between the first and second sets; and the spokes of the first set being angularly off-set from the spokes of the second set, as viewed axially of the hub, so as to accommodate a splice in the cable between the first and second sets.
With this reel, the successive turns of the cable wound on the reel are retained, by their snug fit between the first and second sets of spokes, from becoming laterally off-set from one another, which avoids the lateral loading of the spokes referred to above. However, the off-setting of the spokes of the two sets allow a splice in the cable to protrude into a spacing between successive spokes at one side of the cable, thus accommodating the diameter of the splice, which is greater than that of the remainder of the cable.
Further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a view in perspective of a cable reel according to a first embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 1a shows a broken-away view, in axial cross-section, through parts of the cable reel of FIG. 1;
FIG. 2 shows a diagrammatic view in axial cross-section through a prior art cable reel;
FIG. 3 shows a view in horizontal cross-section through parts of the cable reel of FIG. 3;
FIG. 4 shows a view corresponding to that of FIG. 3 but taken in section through parts of the cable reel of FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 shows a view in perspective of a cable reel according to a second embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 5a shows a broken-away view taken in horizontal cross-section through parts of the cable reel of FIG. 5.
As shown in FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings, a cable reel according to the first embodiment of the present invention is indicated generally by reference numeral 10 and has a hub 11, a first set of spokes 12 and a second set of spokes 13.
The first set of spokes 12 are spaced axially of the hub 10 from the second set of spokes 13 by a spacing S1 (FIG. 1a), the magnitude of which is slightly greater than the diameter of a cable 16 (FIG. 4) which is to be wound on the cable reel 10.
The outer ends of the spokes 12 and 13 are connected by rims 18 and 19, respectively, and as can be seen from FIG. 1a have opposed radially inwardly inclined end portions 15, which facilitate reception of the cable 16 between the two sets of spokes.
The advantage of the present spoke arrangement will be more readily apparent from consideration of the prior art cable reel indicated generally by reference numeral 10a in FIG. 2.
The cable reel 10a has a hub 11a and two sets of spokes 12a and 13a which are spaced apart from one another, axially of the hub 11a, by a spacing S2 (FIG. 3).
As illustrated in FIG. 3, the spacing S2 is selected so as to be sufficiently greater than the diameter of the cable 16 as to accommodate, between the spokes 12a and the spokes 13a, the larger diameter of a splice 21 in the cable 16.
However, since the spacing S2 is thus greater than the diameter of the cable 16, the successive turns of the cable 16 on the reel 16a can become laterally off-set rom one another, as illustrated in FIG. 2.
Consequently, the cable 16 exerts on the spokes 12a and 13a of the cable reel 10a lateral loadings which are represented by arrows A in FIG. 2, and the spokes 12a and 13a therefore have to be strengthened, by giving them a heavy structure, in order to withstand these lateral loadings.
In contrast to this, the spacing S1 between the spokes 12 and 13 of the cable reel 10 of FIGS. 1 and 1a is less than the spacing S2 and is only slightly greater than the diameter of the cable 16, so that the cable 16 is accommodated snugly between the spokes 12 and 13. Thus, the cable 16 is held by the spokes 12 and 13 from becoming laterally off-set in the manner described above with reference to FIG. 2, so that the spokes 12 and 13 are not subjected to the lateral loadings A described above with reference to FIG. 2. The spokes 12 and 13 can therefore be given a lighter and less expensive structure than was required for the spokes 12a and 13a of the prior art reel 10a.
This is possible because, while the spokes 12a and 13a of the prior art reel, as viewed axially of the reel, coincide with one another, i.e. are not angularly off-set from one another, the spokes 12 of the cable reel 10 are angularly off-set, about the axis of the hub 10, from the spokes 13.
More particularly, as viewed axially of the hub 10, the spokes 12 are located midway between the spokes 13.
This angular off-setting of the spokes 12 and 13 enables the splice 21 to protrude between successive spokes 12, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 4. Thus, although the spacing S1 of the spokes 12 from the spokes 13 is less than the diameter of the splice 21, the splice 21 can be accommodated in the reel.
The second embodiment of the invention, illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 5a of the drawings, is intended to hold a power cable in two spaced monospirals. More particularly, the cable reel shown in FIGS. 5 and 5a, which is indicated generally by reference numeral 10b, has first and second spokes 12b and 13b, which are angularly offset from one another as described above with reference to the spokes 12 and 13 of FIG. 1 to accommodate a cable splice such as the splice 21. In addition, the cable reel 10b has a third set of spokes 14b, which are similarly angularly offset from the spokes 13b for the same purpose. As viewed axially of the hub, the spokes 12b and the spokes 14b are each midway between the spokes 13b.
The spokes 12b are spaced from the spokes 13b so as to receive the cable 16 snugly between them and likewise the spokes 14b are also spaced from the spokes 13b so as to receive the cable 16 snugly between them.
The second set of spokes 13b are interrupted by omission of one of the spokes to form a gap 22, through which the cable can be passed to and fro for forming, for example, successive pairs of turns of the cable between the first and second spoke set and the second and third spokes set, which enables the diameter of the reel 10b to be substantially smaller than would otherwise be required. In this way, a first pair of turns between the first and second spoke sets, followed by a second pair of turns between the second and third spoke set, and so forth, can be used to store the cable without the formation of excessively large build-up of cable at the cross-over point in the gap 22.
The three spoke sets are provided with respective rims 18b, 19b and 20b, of which the rim 19b is interrupted as shown at the gap 22.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, various modifications of the present invention may be made within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6554219, | Apr 19 1999 | IGUS SPITZGUSSTEILLE FUR DIE INDUSTRIE GMBH | Transport device |
8074916, | Feb 01 2008 | NORTH MILL CAPITAL LLC | Fiber optic/electrical cable reel assembly |
8480023, | Feb 01 2008 | NORTH MILL CAPITAL LLC | Fiber optic/electrical cable reel assembly |
9126800, | Feb 01 2008 | NORTH MILL CAPITAL LLC | Fiber optic/electrical cable reel assembly with cable clip |
D341770, | Jun 02 1992 | AMES TRUE TEMPER, INC | Wall supported hose reel |
D461395, | Nov 14 2000 | LANKAPAJA OY | Pulley for boats |
D713241, | Oct 15 2012 | The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. | Winding drum |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2649261, | |||
3135478, | |||
3534920, | |||
3576295, | |||
3731886, | |||
3837590, | |||
3946618, | Oct 09 1973 | Superior Iron Works & Supply Company, Inc. | Bull wheel |
3960340, | Nov 13 1973 | A/S Hydraulik Brattvaag | Winch drum provided with side flanges and a separate flange |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 17 1991 | FOIT, VILEM | HILLMAR INDUSTRIES LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005956 | /0794 | |
Dec 20 1991 | Hillmar Industries Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 07 1997 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jun 01 1997 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 01 1996 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 01 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 01 1997 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 01 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 01 2000 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 01 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 01 2001 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 01 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 01 2004 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 01 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 01 2005 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 01 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |