An adaptive transform coding algorithm for a still image utilizes a quadtree based variable block size discrete cosine transform to achieve a better tradeoff between bit rate and image quality. The choice of appropriate block size is made according to a mean based decision rule which can discriminate various image contents for better visual quality.

Patent
   5241395
Priority
Aug 07 1989
Filed
Mar 23 1992
Issued
Aug 31 1993
Expiry
Aug 31 2010
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
188
6
all paid
16. A method for processing a signal comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising a two-dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal comprising a two-dimensional array of pixels into blocks of pixels of size M×M, each of said M×M blocks of pixels having a content,
decomposing each of said M×M blocks into one or more sub-blocks,
comparing adjacent sub-blocks and merging said adjacent sub-blocks when the edges of said adjacent sub-blocks are not in high contrast,
applying an orthogonal transform to each of said sub-blocks to form transform coefficients,
compressing the transform coefficients formed for each of said sub-blocks to form compressed transform coefficients,
utilizing an encoder to form a bit stream corresponding to the compressed transform coefficients, and
storing the bit stream in a memory.
14. A method for processing a signal comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising a two-dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal comprising a two-dimensional array of pixels into blocks of pixels of size M×M, each of said M×M blocks of pixels having a content,
selectively decomposing each of said M×M blocks into one or more sub-blocks,
comparing adjacent sub-blocks and merging said adjacent sub-blocks when the edges of said adjacent sub-blocks are not in high-contrast,
applying the discrete cosine transform to each of said sub-blocks to form transform coefficients,
compressing the transform coefficients formed for each of said sub-blocks to form compressed transform coefficients,
utilizing an encoder to form a bit stream corresponding to the compressed transform coefficients, and
passing the bit stream to a channel coder for transmission via a channel to a receiver at a remote location.
13. A method for processing a signal corresponding to a still image comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising of two dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal comprising said two-dimensional array of pixels into blocks of pixels of varying sizes such that the size of said blocks is determined by finding boundaries where the abutting edges of said varying sized blocks are high contrast edges,
applying the orthogonal transform to each of said blocks of pixels to form a two-dimensional array of transform coefficients for each of said blocks of pixels,
compressing the transform coefficients obtained for each block of pixels to form a two-dimensional array of compressed transform coefficients for each block of pixels,
scanning the two-dimensional array of compressed transform coefficients to form a signal comprising one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients for each block of pixels,
utilizing an encoder to encode the signal comprising a one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients for each block to form a bit stream representative of a still image, and
transmitting said bit stream via a channel to a receiver at a remote location.
1. A method for processing a signal corresponding to a still image so that said still image can be transmitted to a remote location via a channel, said method comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising a two-dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal into blocks of pixels of size M×M, each of said M×M blocks of pixels having a content,
splitting each of said M×M blocks to produce a hierarchy of sub-blocks including the levels designated i-0,1,2, . . . ,K-1, so that at each level of the hierarchy, there are 4i sub-blocks of size m/2i ×M/2i, i=0,1, . . . ,K-1, where K is an integer,
starting with the K-1 level in said hierarchy and proceeding to successive levels in said hierarchy, merging adjacent of said sub-blocks when the differences in the mean pixel value of said sub-blocks is below a predetermined threshold,
applying an orthogonal transform individually to each of said sub-blocks comprising said M×M blocks of pixels to form transform coefficients for each of said sub-blocks,
utilizing an encoder to convert the transform coefficients for each sub-block into a signal in the form of a stream of bits, and
transmitting said signal in the form of a stream of bits for each of said sub-blocks via a channel to a receiver at a remote location.
9. A method for processing a signal corresponding to a still image so that said still image can be transmitted to a remote location via a channel, said method comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising a two-dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal into blocks of pixels of size M×M, each of said M×M blocks of pixels having a content,
depending on the content of each of said M×M blocks of pixels, selectively decomposing each of said M×M blocks of pixels into one or more sub-blocks of pixels, each of said sub-blocks being of a size given by m/2i ×M/2i, where i=0,1,2, . . . ,K-1 and where K is an integer,
said decomposing step comprising
splitting each of said M×M blocks to produce a hierarchy of sub-blocks including the levels designated i=0,1, . . . K-1, so that at each level of the hierarchy, there are 4i sub-blocks of size m/2i ×M/2i, i=0,1, . . . K-1, and
starting at the level of K-1 in said hierarchy and proceeding to successive levels in said hierarchy, testing each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks and merging each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks in which the difference of mean pixel value of any two sub-blocks is smaller than a predetermined value until a level in the hierarchy is reached wherein there are no sets of childless brother/sister sub-blocks to be tested,
applying an orthogonal transform individually to each of said sub-blocks comprising said M×M blocks of pixels to form transform coefficients for each of said sub-blocks,
utilizing an encoder to convert the transform coefficients for each sub-block into a signal in the form of a stream of bits, and
transmitting said signal in the form of a stream of bits for each of said sub-blocks via a channel to a receiver at a remote location.
10. A method for processing a signal corresponding to a still image so that said still image can be transmitted to a remote location via a channel, said method comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising a two-dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal into blocks of pixels of size M×M, each of said M×M blocks of pixels having a content,
depending on the content of each of said M×M blocks of pixels, selectively decomposing each of said M×M blocks of pixels into one or more sub-blocks of pixels, each of said sub-blocks being of a size given by m/2i ×M/2i, where i=0,1,2, . . . , K-1 and where K is an integer,
said decomposing step comprising
splitting each of said M×M blocks to produce a hierarchy of sub-blocks including the levels designated i=0,1, . . . K-1, so that at each level of the hierarchy, there are 4i sub-blocks of size m/2i ×M/2i, i=0,1, . . . K-1, and
starting at the level of K-1 in said hierarchy and proceeding to successive levels in said hierarchy, testing each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks and merging each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks in which the difference of mean pixel value of any two sub-blocks is smaller than a predetermined value, chosen individually for each level in said hierarchy, until a level in the hierarchy is reached wherein there are no sets of childless brother/sister sub-blocks to be tested,
applying an orthogonal transform individually to each of said sub-blocks comprising said M×M blocks of pixels to form transform coefficients for each of said sub-blocks,
utilizing an encoder to convert the transform coefficients for each sub-block into a signal in the form of a stream of bits, and
transmitting said signal in the form of a stream of bits for each of said sub-blocks via a channel to a receiver at a remote location.
11. A method for processing a signal corresponding to a still image comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising a two dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal comprising said two-dimensional array of pixels into blocks of pixels of varying sizes such that smooth areas of said image are smaller sized blocks and busy areas of said image are larger sized blocks, said dividing step comprises
dividing said image into M×M blocks of pixels,
splitting said M×M blocks to produce a hierarchy of sub-blocks including the levels designated 1=0,1, . . . K-1, where K is an integer, so that at each level of the hierarchy there are 4i sub-blocks of size m/2i ×M/2i, and
starting with the K-1 in the hierarchy and proceeding to successive levels in the hierarchy, testing each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks and merging each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks and merging each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks in which the difference of mean pixel value of any two sub-blocks is smaller than a predetermined value until a level in the hierarchy is reached in which there are no sets of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks to be tested,
applying the orthogonal transform to each of said blocks of pixels to form a two-dimensional array of transform coefficients for each of said blocks of pixels,
compressing the transform coefficients obtained for each block of pixels to form a two-dimensional array of compressed transform coefficients for each of said blocks of pixels,
scanning the two-dimensional array of compressed transform coefficients to form a signal comprising a one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients for each block of pixels,
utilizing an encoder to encode the signal comprising a one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients for each block to form a bit stream representative of a still image, and
transmitting said bit stream via a channel to a receiver at a remote location.
12. A method for processing a signal corresponding to a still image comprising the steps of
providing a signal comprising a two dimensional array of pixels which is representative of a still image,
dividing said signal comprising said two-dimensional array of pixels into blocks of pixels of varying sizes such that smooth areas of said image are smaller sized blocks and busy areas of said image are larger sized blocks, said dividing step comprising
dividing said image into M×M blocks of pixels,
splitting said M×M blocks to produce a hierarchy of sub-blocks including the levels designated 1=0,1, . . . K-1, where K is an integer, so that at each level of the hierarchy there are 4i sub-blocks of size m/2i ×M/2i, and
starting with the K-1 in the hierarchy and proceeding to successive levels in the hierarchy, testing each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks and merging each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks and merging each set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks in which the difference of mean pixel value of any two sub-blocks is smaller than a predetermined value, determined individually for each level in the hierarchy, until a level in the hierarchy is reached in which there are no sets of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks to be tested,
applying the orthogonal transform to each of said blocks of pixels to form a two-dimensional array of transform coefficients for each of said blocks of pixels,
compressing the transform coefficients obtained for each block of pixels to form a two-dimensional array of compressed transform coefficients for each of said blocks of pixels,
scanning the two-dimensional array of compressed transform coefficients to form a signal comprising a one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients for each block of pixels,
utilizing an encoder to encode the signal comprising a one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients for each block to form a bit stream representative of a still image, and
transmitting said bit stream via a channel to a receiver at a remote location.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said orthogonal transform is a discrete cosine transform.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein sub-blocks of different sizes are coded using different codes.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said method further comprises the steps of compressing the transform coefficients resulting from the application of an orthogonal transform to each sub-block of pixels and coding the compressed transform coefficients.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said compressing step comprises thresholding said transform coefficients with a threshold value T and quantizing said transform coefficients with a quantization step size Q.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said quantization step size Q is chosen individually for each different sub-block size.
7. The method of claim 5 wherein said threshold value T is chosen individually for each different sub-block size.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said transmitting step comprises transmitting the stream of bits for each sub-block to a channel coder for transmission to said remote location.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein said selective decomposing step comprises the steps of successively splitting each M×M block to form a hierarchy of sub-blocks and selectively merging sets of childless brother/sister sub-blocks at one or more levels in said hierarchy.

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/389,420, filed Aug. 7, 1989, abandoned.

A patent application entitled "Adaptive Transform Coding of Still Images", filed for C. T. Chen and D. J. LeGall on Jul. 19, 1989 and bearing Ser. No. 07/381,860 is assigned to the assignee hereof and contains subject matter related to the subject matter of the present application.

The present invention relates to a method for coding still images. More particularly, the present invention relates to a transform coding algorithm for an image in which the image is divided into pixel blocks of different size according to image contents and in which an orthogonal transform such as a discrete cosine transform is applied to the pixel blocks.

Transform coding has proven to be an efficient means of coding a still image signal for transmission to a remote receiver.

In accordance with a basic transform image coding algorithm, a still image is divided into blocks of pixels. For example, each block of pixels may be a 16×16 block. Each block of pixels undergoes a two-dimensional orthogonal transform to produce a two-dimensional array of transform coefficients. For still image coding applications, the discrete cosine transform has emerged as the best orthogonal transform from the point of view of image compression and ease of implementation.

After a block of pixels undergoes a transform such as a discrete cosine transform, the resulting transform coefficients are subject to compression by thresholding and quantization. Thresholding involves setting all coefficients whose magnitude is smaller than a threshold value T equal to zero. In some thresholding processes, when a coefficient has a magnitude greater than T, T is subtracted if the coefficient is positive and T is added if the coefficient is negative. The DC transform coefficient may be excluded from the thresholding process. Quantization involves scaling a coefficient by a step size Q and rounding off to the nearest integer.

After compression, the compressed transform coefficients are then coded, for example, using a Huffman code, to form a bit stream for transmission to a remote receiver. At the receiver, an inverse process occurs to reconstruct the original block pixels. Thus, the received bit stream is decoded and the received quantized transform coefficients are expanded by the quantization step size. An inverse transform such as an inverse discrete cosine transform is then applied to the transform coefficients to reconstruct the block of pixels. In this manner, an image is transmitted block by block from a transmitter to a receiver.

In the conventional transform coding algorithm described above, the parameters of importance are the block size, the threshold value T, and the quantization step size Q. The conventional transform coding algorithm uses fixed parameters for all blocks from an image, i.e., the block size, threshold value T and quantization step size Q remain constant for all blocks within an image and from image to image.

The drawback of using fixed parameters is that the bit rate and image quality cannot achieve their best trade-off for a wide variety of images. Higher image quality is obtained at the price of higher bit rate for those busy image areas where the same visual quality may be achieved at a lower bit rate with another set of parameters.

To yield a better tradeoff between the bit rate and image quality, the parameters used in the transform coding algorithm have to be adaptive to the image contents. This motivates an adaptive transform coding approach for still images, where higher image quality can be obtained at a lower average bit rate (see e.g., W. H. Chen et al, "Scene Adaptive Coder", IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol COM-32, pp 225-232, March 1984; N. Texier et al "Hybrid Transform Video Coding Scheme for Low Bit Rate: An Improvement of the Reference Algorithm", Proc. Picture Coding Symp. pp. 8.4-1-2, Turin, Italy, September 1988).

In the above-identified patent application, an adaptive transform coding algorithm is disclosed which utilizes an adaptive threshold value T and an adaptive quantization step size Q along with a fixed block size. In particular, the compression parameters Q and T are selected individually for each block of pixels. In general, smaller (larger) compression parameters result in higher (lower) bit rates and image quality. Thus, large compression parameters are used for busy blocks where the human visual system is not very sensitive to degradation and small compression parameters are used for smooth blocks where the human visual system to degradation.

Illustratively, a measure of the busyness of a block is the magnitude of the (K+1)th most significant transform coefficient, where K is an integer which remains the same for all blocks in an image or in a plurality of images. The magnitude of the (K+1)th most significant transform coefficient is used to determine the threshold value T and quantization step size Q individually for each block of pixels. The magnitude of the (K+1)th transform coefficient is large for busy blocks where the human visual system is not sensitive to degradation and results in large compression parameters and lower bit rates. On the other hand, for smooth blocks, the transform coefficients fall off rapidly, and the magnitude of the (K+1)th transform coefficient is small resulting in small compression parameters and higher bit rates. In comparison to the conventional transform coding algorithm, the adaptive transform coding algorithm described above provides more consistent image quality and lower average bit rate for a wide variety of images.

It is an object of the present invention to provide an alternative adaptive transform coding algorithm wherein adaptivity is achieved by varying the pixel block size according to image contents.

In particular, a larger pixel block size advantageously results in better compression because more pixels are provided for decorrelation in the transform process. However, an inherent disadvantage of a large block size is that the quality of the resulting reconstructed image is not consistent amongst various images or from block to block within a single image. For example, blocking and ringing artifacts are more visible in a reconstructed image where a relatively larger pixel block size is used if the image contains high contrast edges. On the other hand, small pixel block size enables less compression but better quality of the reconstructed image.

Therefore, it is a further object of the present invention to provide an adaptive transform coding algorithm which takes advantage of the compression capability of large block size and the high visual image quality of small block size by choosing the appropriate block size according to the image contents so as to achieve a better tradeoff between bit rate and image quality.

The present invention is an adaptive transform coding algorithm wherein adaptivity is achieved via a variable block size determined according to image contents.

An image is first divided into relatively large blocks of pixels of size M×M. Let N×N be the size of the smallest block of pixels of interest in the inventive algorithm, where M=N×2K-1 and where K is a positive integer. Each M×M block is decomposed into 4K-1 blocks of size N×N by successively splitting each block into four equally sized sub-blocks until the smallest sub-block of size N×N is reached.

The successive splitting of blocks results in a hierarchy of sub-blocks with K levels, which levels are designated i=0,1,2 . . . K-1. At each level in the hierarchy, the sub-block size is M/2i ×M/2i. All sub-blocks at the same level of the hierarchy are in the same "generation" and sub-blocks derived from the same parent sub-block are said to be brother/sister sub-blocks.

Illustratively, a three-level hierarchy of sub-blocks (i.e. K=3) is utilized. For example, if M=16, the i=0 level of the hierarchy comprises one 16×16 block. The i=1 level of the hierarchy comprises four 8×8 brother/sister sub-blocks arrived at by splitting the 16×16 block into four sub-blocks. The i=K-1=2 level of the hierarchy comprises sixteen 4×4 sub-blocks (so that N=4), which sub-blocks are arrived at by splitting each 8×8 sub-block four ways. Thus, a hierarchy of levels i=0,1, and 2 is achieved with sub-blocks of size 16×16, 8×8, and 4×4, respectively. It should be noted that each of the 4×4 sub-blocks in the i=2 level of the hierarchy is childless since 4×4 is the smallest block size of interest.

In the inventive algorithm, the maximum sized block to which an orthogonal transform such as a discrete cosine transform is applied is an M×M block and the smallest block to which a discrete cosine transform is applied is N×N. Depending on the image contents of a particular M×M block, the discrete cosine transform may be applied to the M×M block as a whole, to all 4K-1 sub-blocks of size N×N which are derived from the M×M block, or to a mosaic of sub-blocks of different sizes, which sizes are given by M/2i ×M/2i where i=0,1, . . . K-1.

Thus, in the three level hierarchy, presented as an example above, the discrete cosine transform may be applied to a 16×16 block as a whole. Alternatively, depending on image contents, the discrete cosine transform may be applied individually to the sixteen 4×4 sub-blocks derived from the 16×16 block. In another case, the discrete cosine transform may be applied individually to four 4×4 brother/sister sub-blocks in the i=K-1=2 level of the hierarchy and to three 8×8 brother/sister sub-blocks in the i=K-2=1 level of the hierarchy.

To determine the blocks to which the discrete cosine transform is applied, a testing and selective merging process is utilized based on image contents.

Starting at the i=K-1 level of the hierarchy, the algorithm first checks to see if the discrete cosine transform should be applied to sub-blocks of size N×N (i.e. blocks of M/2K-1 ×M/2K-1) by using a test involving four adjacent brother/sister N×N blocks. If the test is negative, the four adjacent N×N blocks are merged to form a single (now childless) 2N×2N block (i.e. a block of size M/2K-2 ×M/2K-2). If the test is positive the discrete cosine transform is applied individually to the four brother/sister blocks of size N×N.

If the testing and merging process, when applied to the (K-1) level of the hierarchy, results in the formation of four (now childless) brother/sister 2N×2N sub-blocks in the (K-2) level of the hierarchy, the test is applied to determine if the four 2N×2N sub-blocks should be merged. If such 2N×2N sub-blocks are not merged, the discrete cosine transform is applied to the 2N×2N sub-blocks individually. Otherwise, these four 2N×2N sub-blocks are merged into a single 4N×4N (now childless) block. Similarly, if the testing and merging process, when applied to the K-1 level of the hierarchy, results in the formation of one or more 2N×2N sub-blocks in the (K-2) level of the hierarchy, but not a set of four childless brother/sister 2N×2N sub-blocks, then the discrete cosine transform is applied individually to the 2N×2N sub-blocks.

This testing and selective merger process continues up the hierarchy until the M×M block is reached in which case the discrete cosine transform is applied to the M×M block or until at some level in the hierarchy there are no possible mergers left (i.e., no sets of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks to be tested) so that the discrete cosine transform is applied to the remaining sub-blocks at that level in the hierarchy.

Illustratively, the test to determine whether or not to merge a set of brother/sister sub-blocks at a particular level of the hierarchy utilizes the mean pixel value of the sub-blocks. Let mi (k); k=1,2,3,4 represent the mean pixel value of four brother/sister sub-blocks at the ith level of the hierarchy. If there is a j≠k such that

|mi (j)-mi (k)|>ti ( 1)

do not merge; otherwise merge, where ti is a predetermined value for the ith level in the hierarchy.

Using the above-described sub-block hierarchy, and the above-described testing and selective merging steps, an M×M block is decomposed into one or more sub-blocks to which a discrete cosine transform is applied.

As indicated above, in discrete cosine transform coding, large block size introduces visible degradation if the block contains high contrast edges. Therefore, it is desirable to keep the block size as small as possible for such areas. The testing criterion based on mean pixel value described above can discriminate quite well between those areas with high contrast edges and other areas where the human visual system is not sensitive to degradation and for which larger block size should be used to take advantage of the greater compression capability offered by a larger block size.

After the block size determination procedure described above is performed, a discrete cosine transform is applied to the resulting variably sized blocks. The resulting transform coefficients in array form are compressed by thresholding and quantization in the manner discussed above. The compressed transform coefficients are then zigzag scanned to form a one dimensional sequence of transform coefficients which are then coded for transmission to a remote receiver or for storage in a memory.

In comparison to the conventional transform coding algorithm, the adaptive transform coding algorithm based on variable block size achieves the same or better visual quality with a lower average bit rate.

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a conventional transform coding algorithm for a still image.

FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a three-level quadtree structure and its binary representation.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an adaptive transform coding algorithm using variable block size in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the present invention.

A conventional transform coding algorithm for a still image is schematically illustrated by the block diagram of FIG. 1.

A still image signal to be coded comprises a two-dimensional array of pixels, e.g., 512×512 pixels. The still image signal is divided (step 12 of FIG. 1) into disjoint blocks of smaller size, e.g., 8×8 or 16×16 blocks of pixels.

A two-dimensional discrete cosine transform is applied to each block of pixels (step 14 of FIG. 1).

The two-dimensional discrete cosine transform of a two-dimensional pixel value array f(j,k) for j,k=0,1. . . n-1 can be defined as ##EQU1## for u,v=0,1, . . . N-1, where ##EQU2##

Thus, F(u,v) for u,v=0,1, . . . n-1 represents a two-dimensional array of transform coefficients.

The inverse transform is then given by ##EQU3##

The coefficients F(u,v) obtained for a block of pixels may be viewed as comprising DC and AC coefficients. The DC coefficient is F(0,0) which represents the average intensity of the block. The remainder of the coefficients (F(0,1), F(1,0)etc.) are AC coefficients.

Illustratively, the transform coefficients F(u,v) obtained by applying the discrete cosine transform to each block of pixels in the input image are normalized to a range of [-255,255] for the AC coefficients and [0,510] for the DC coefficient if the input image data range from [0,255], i.e., 8 bits per pixel.

The two-dimensional array of the transform coefficients F(u,v) obtained for each block of pixels is then compressed by thresholding and quantization (step 16 of FIG. 1).

In particular, each of the coefficients except the DC coefficient F(0,0) is thresholded and each of the coefficients is quantized.

The characteristics of the thresholding step are as follows: ##EQU4## where FT (u,v) represents the thresholded coefficients and T is a predetermined threshold value. This means that if the magnitude of a coefficient is less than T it is set to zero. In some thresholding processes, when the magnitude of a coefficient is greater than T, T is subtracted from a positive coefficient and added to a negative coefficient.

The characteristics of the quantizing step are as follows:

FTQ (u,v)=NINT(FT (u,v)/Q) (6)

where FTQ (u,v) is a thresholded and quantized transform coefficient, Q is a quantization step size and NINT is the nearest integer function. Thus, a quantized and thresholded transform coefficient FTQ (u,v) is obtained from a thresholded coefficient FT (u,v) by scaling with a step size Q and rounding to the nearest integer. The DC coefficient F(0,0) (which is not thresholded) is quantized with Q=1 to ensure intensity continuity within the image.

After compression, the two-dimensional array of transform coefficients FTQ (u,v) u=0,1, . . . n-1,v=0,1, . . . n-1 is zig-zag scanned (step 18 of FIG. 1) (see the Chen et al reference identified above) into a one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients to facilitate encoding. The one-dimensional sequence of transform coefficients is then coded (step 20 of FIG. 1) using an entropy encoding process to form a bit stream which may be transmitted to a channel coder for transmission to a remote receiver or stored in a memory.

As indicated above, the present invention modifies the above-identified algorithm so that the pixel block size is adaptive based on image contents. Before discussing the inventive algorithm in detail it will be helpful to discuss a data structure known as a quadtree data structure. The quadtree data structure is useful for understanding the determination of block size in accordance with the inventive algorithm.

The quadtree 40 of FIG. 2 is a hierarchical data structure where each node (e.g. 42, 44) generates four children, unless it is a leaf (e.g. 46). Thus, the node 44 has four children 51, 52, 53, 54. The children 61, 62, 63, 64 of the node 46, which are shown in phantom, have been removed from the quadtree structure so that the node 46, as stated above, has no children and is a leaf. Similarly, the nodes 51, 52, 53, 54 are childless and are also leaves.

All nodes originating from the same parent are brother/sister nodes to each other. Thus, the nodes 51, 52, 53, 54 are such brother/sister nodes. In FIG. 2, non-leaf and leaf nodes are represented by logic "1" and logic "0" respectively. The node 42 at the top of the quadtree structure of FIG. 2 is a root, which is also defined as a 0th level node. If a node is an ith level node, then all the other nodes in the same generation are also ith level nodes. The children, if any, of an ith level node are (i+1)th level nodes. The quadtree structure 40 of FIG. 2 is a three level structure. The 0th level includes the root node 42. The first level includes the nodes 44, 46, 47, 48 and the second level includes the nodes 51, 52, 53, 54.

As indicated above, the present invention is an adaptive transform coding technique wherein adaptivity is achieved via a variable block size determined according to block attribute. The adaptive transform coding algorithm of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 3.

A process (100 of FIG. 3) for choosing a block size based on image content is now considered in detail. First the image is divided into relatively large M×M blocks (step 102 of FIG. 3). Each M×M block may be viewed as a root node in a quadtree data structure.

The smallest sub-block size of interest in the algorithm is N×N where M=N×2K-1, where K is a positive integer.

Each M×M block is decomposed into 4K-1 sub-blocks of size N×N by successively splitting each block into four equally sized sub-blocks until the smallest sub-block size of N×N is reached (step 104 of FIG. 3). The sub-blocks which result from splitting an M×M block (K-1) times may be represented by a full K level quadtree structure (i.e. a K level quadtree structure in which all children are present) wherein each node represents a sub-block of pixels. In particular, an ith level node represents a sub-block of size M/2i ×M/2i.

Illustratively, a three level partition may be utilized. Thus, M may be set equal to 16 so that the largest block size of interest is 16×16 . This block corresponds to the 0th level root node 42 of the quadtree structure of FIG. 2. The 16×16 block is first divided into four 8×8 sub-blocks corresponding to the first level nodes of FIG. 2. Each 8×8 sub-block is then divided into four 4×4 sub-blocks corresponding to the second level nodes of FIG. 2. Some of the second level nodes, e.g. 61, 62, 63, 64 are shown in phantom in FIG. 2. For the reasons stated below, these nodes and the sub-blocks corresponding to them have been removed from the quadtree structure.

In accordance with the variable block size adaptive transform coding algorithm, a test is made (step 106 of FIG. 3) to determine if a discrete cosine transform should be applied to the childless sub-blocks of size N×N. The test uses a decision rule involving four adjacent childless brother/sister sub-blocks. If the test is positive the discrete cosine transform is applied (step 108 of FIG. 3) to the four childless N×N brother/sister sub-blocks. If the test is negative, these sub-blocks are merged (step 109 of FIG. 3) into one 2N×2N sub-block. The 2N×2N sub-block formed by such a merger is childless. In other words, the nodes representing the now merged N×N sub-blocks are removed from the quadtree structure so that the node representing the parent 2N×2N sub-block becomes a leaf.

In the three level example shown in FIG. 2, the test is applied to the set of brother/sister 4×4 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 51, 52, 53, 54; the set of brother/sister 4×4 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 61, 62, 63, 64; the set of brother/sister 4×4 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 81, 82, 83, 84 and the set of brother/sister 4×4 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 71, 72, 73, 74.

The 4×4 sub-blocks represented by nodes 61, 62, 63, 64 (shown in phantom) are removed by merging them into the 8×8 sub-block represented by the node 46. Thus, as a result of the test and merger steps the node 46 becomes a leaf whose binary representation, as indicated above, is a logic "0". Similarly, the 4×4 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 71, 72, 73, 74 (shown in phantom) are removed by merging them into the 8×8 sub-block represented by the node 47. On the other hand, the 4×4 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 51, 52, 53, 54 are not merged and the sub-blocks represented by the nodes 81, 82, 83, 84 are not merged. Thus, the discrete cosine transform is applied individually to these sub-blocks.

The test and selective merger process is repeated at each level of the hierarchy for each set of four sub-blocks represented by brother/sister nodes which are all leaves (i.e. which have no children and are thus represented by logic value "0") until a level in the hierarchy is reached in which there are no sets of brother/sister nodes which are all leaves or until the root node is reached. The discrete cosine transform is then applied individually to the resulting arrangement of blocks of variable size.

In the three level structure of FIG. 2, the test and selective merger process is not applied at the level i=1 because there is no set of four brother/sister nodes which are leaves. Instead, at the level i=1, there are two nodes which are leaves (46, 47) and two nodes which are not leaves (44, 48). Thus, in the example of FIG. 2, the discrete cosine transform is applied individually to the 4×4 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 51, 52, 53, 54 and the nodes 81, 82, 83, 84. The discrete cosine transform is also applied individually to the 8×8 sub-blocks represented by the nodes 46, 47.

The decision rule which determines whether to merge a particular set of four childless brother/sister sub-blocks is based on the differences in mean pixel values of the four adjacent brother/sister sub-blocks. Assuming that the blocks are ith level blocks and that the mean pixel value of the kth sub-block is mi (k), for k=1,2,3,4, then if there is a j≠k such that |mi(j)-mi(k)|>ti ; do not merge, otherwise merge.

Note, that ti is a predetermined value for the ith level in the quadtree structure. Different values may be utilized at different levels in the quadtree structure.

As indicated above, in discrete cosine transform coding, large block size introduces visible degradation if the block contains high contrast edges. Therefore, it is desirable to keep the blocksize as small as possible for these areas. The above-described process, involving use of a hierarchy of sub-blocks and testing and selective merging steps based on a decision rule using mean pixel values, serves to divide each M×M block from areas containing high contrast edges into sub-blocks of relatively small size. In contrast, M×M blocks from other image areas where the human visual system is not sensitive to degradation are divided into sub-blocks of larger size or not divided at all to achieve greater compression.

After the quadtree structure of sub-blocks is obtained, the discrete cosine transform is applied to the sub-blocks (step 108, FIG. 3). The transform coefficients resulting from application of the transform to each sub-block are then compressed by thresholding with a threshold value T and quantizing with a quantization step size Q (step 110 of FIG. 3). As indicated above, the image quality and bit rate are determined at least in part by the compression parameters T and Q. In accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the invention, different compression parameters T and Q may be chosen for sub-blocks of different size (i.e. for sub-blocks at different levels of the quadtree structure).

After compression, the transform coefficients of a sub-block of pixels are zigzag scanned (step 112 of FIG. 3) to convert the transform coefficients from an array to a sequence. The sequence of transform coefficients is then encoded (step 114 of FIG. 3) using for example entropy coding. The resulting bit stream is then sent to a channel coder for transmission to a remotely located receiver or stored in a memory. For entropy coding, different code books may be used for each block size according to its statistics.

For reconstruction of a block of pixels (i.e. an original M×M block) from the bit stream received at a remote receiver, it is necessary to inform the receiver of the quadtree structure used to partition the block. For this reason, some overhead bits are sent along with the image data. In practice, the bit value (logic "1" or logic "0") assigned to each node in the quadtree represent this overhead. This overhead is extremely trivial for a three or four level quadtree block partition structure. It should be noted that if the receiver has a priori knowledge of the number of levels in the quadtree structure, it is not necessary to send the information concerning the lowest level nodes in the quadtree structure. In the example of FIG. 2, the overhead bits may be 11010 corresponding to nodes 42, 44, 46, 48, 47, respectively. It is well worth mentioning that using different compression parameters and different code books for different sub-block sizes does not require additional overhead since the information is contained in the quadtree structure.

At a receiver, a received bit stream corresponding to a sub-block of pixels is decoded and the received transform coefficients are expanded by the appropriate quantization step size. An inverse orthogonal transform such as an inverse discrete cosine transform is then used to reconstruct the sub-block of pixels.

In an illustrative example of the inventive algorithm, the input image is 8 bits per pixel [0,255] and its size is 512×512. A three level block size partition scheme is utilized in which the largest block size of interest is 16×16 and the smallest block size of interest is 4×4. The decision thresholds ti in the block partitioning scheme are set to 10 for both i=1 and i=2 in the three level partition scheme. The partitioning scheme serves to divide the image into a mosaic of 16×16, 8×8, and 4×4 blocks depending on the contents of particular areas in the image.

After the discrete cosine transform is applied to the 16×16, 4×4 and 8×8 blocks, the transform coefficients are normalized to a range of [0,510] for the DC transform coefficients and [-255,255] for the AC transform coefficients. Note that if the discrete cosine transform is defined as in Equation (2) above, these ranges are achieved automatically when the input data ranges from [0,255].

For compression, the threshold value T is set to zero for all block sizes and the quantization step size Q is set to 1,3, and 6 for 16×16, 8×8 and 4×4 blocks, respectively.

For an image comprising text, the bit rate achieved using the variable block size adaptive transform coding algorithm is 2.2548 bits per pixel. The mean square error is 4.5 and the quadtree overhead is 0.01616 bits per pixel. In contrast, when the same "text" image is encoded using the conventional discrete cosine transform algorithm, with a 16×16 block size and a quantization step size of Q=4.0, the bit rate is 2.3639 bits per pixel and the corresponding mean square error is 66.1. Thus, the inventive algorithm provides a better quality reconstructed image at a lower bit rate than the conventional algorithm.

Finally, the above-described embodiments of the invention are intended to be illustrative only. Numerous alternative embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Chen, Cheng-Tie

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10015519, Jun 07 2009 LG Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for decoding a video signal
10063863, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC DC coefficient signaling at small quantization step sizes
10075731, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding / decoding with re-oriented transforms and sub-block transform sizes
10123038, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding / decoding with sub-block transform sizes and adaptive deblock filtering
10158879, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Sub-block transform coding of prediction residuals
10306227, Jun 03 2008 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive quantization for enhancement layer video coding
10390037, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding/decoding with sub-block transform sizes and adaptive deblock filtering
10405001, Jun 07 2009 LG Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for decoding a video signal
10462494, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
10554985, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC DC coefficient signaling at small quantization step sizes
10659793, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC DC coefficient signaling at small quantization step sizes
10986372, Jun 07 2009 LG Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for decoding a video signal
11076175, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
11659210, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
5299019, Feb 28 1992 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Image signal band compressing system for digital video tape recorder
5396567, Nov 16 1990 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process for adaptive quantization for the purpose of data reduction in the transmission of digital images
5414469, Oct 31 1991 International Business Machines Corporation Motion video compression system with multiresolution features
5414527, Aug 14 1991 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Image encoding apparatus sensitive to tone variations
5416603, Apr 30 1991 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Image segmentation using discrete cosine transfer data, and image data transmission apparatus and method using this image segmentation
5446806, Nov 15 1993 National Semiconductor Corp Quadtree-structured Walsh transform video/image coding
5495538, May 28 1993 Xerox Corporation Segmentation-based JPEG image artifacts reduction
5596659, Sep 01 1992 Apple Inc Preprocessing and postprocessing for vector quantization
5649030, Sep 01 1992 Apple Inc Vector quantization
5717497, Apr 30 1991 Ricoh Company, Inc. Image-data transmitter having function of automatic segmented image coding
5729633, Aug 30 1991 FUJIFILM Corporation Picture data compression coding device and method thereof
5748786, Sep 21 1994 RICOH COMPANY, LTD , A CORPORATION OF JAPAN; Ricoh Corporation Apparatus for compression using reversible embedded wavelets
5748788, Sep 29 1992 Cannon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing method and apparatus
5768434, Nov 15 1993 National Semiconductor Corp. Quadtree-structured walsh transform coding
5786856, Mar 19 1996 International Business Machines Method for adaptive quantization by multiplication of luminance pixel blocks by a modified, frequency ordered hadamard matrix
5790747, Oct 31 1992 Sony Corporation Digital video signal recording apparatus with shuffling across an entire high definition image
5812195, Sep 14 1993 Envistech, Inc. Video compression using an iterative correction data coding method and systems
5822465, Sep 01 1992 Apple Inc Image encoding by vector quantization of regions of an image and codebook updates
5831688, Oct 31 1994 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Image coded data re-encoding apparatus
5864637, Apr 18 1995 AMD TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC ; GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc Method and apparatus for improved video decompression by selective reduction of spatial resolution
5867602, Sep 21 1994 RICOH COMPANY, LTD , A CORPORATION OF JAPAN Reversible wavelet transform and embedded codestream manipulation
5881176, Jun 30 1995 RICOH CO , LTD Compression and decompression with wavelet style and binary style including quantization by device-dependent parser
5903669, Jan 31 1995 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and method
5923787, Sep 17 1993 Ricoh Company Ltd. Quantization device and method, inverse-quantization device and method, and image processing device and method
5949422, Jul 29 1996 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD Shape data compression method, shape data decompression method, shape data compression apparatus, and shape data decompression apparatus
5966465, Sep 21 1994 RICOH CO LTD Compression/decompression using reversible embedded wavelets
5999655, Jul 11 1996 U S PHILIPS CORPORATION Method and apparatus for transmission of video pictures which are segmented to form maps of picture blocks of variable block sizes
5999656, Jan 17 1997 RICOH CO LTD , HAVING A PLACE OF BUSINESS IN TOKYO, JAPAN; Ricoh Corporation Overlapped reversible transforms for unified lossless/lossy compression
6002801, Apr 18 1995 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for improved video decompression by selection of IDCT method based on image characteristics
6044172, Dec 22 1997 Ricoh Company, LTD Method and apparatus for reversible color conversion
6148027, May 30 1997 MEDIATEK, INC Method and apparatus for performing hierarchical motion estimation using nonlinear pyramid
6195465, Sep 20 1994 RICOH COMPANY, LTD , A CORP OF JAPAN Method and apparatus for compression using reversible wavelet transforms and an embedded codestream
6222941, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Corporation Apparatus for compression using reversible embedded wavelets
6263106, Jul 04 1995 Hoya Corporation Image data compression device having compression inhibiting function
6314452, Aug 31 1999 IDX Investment Corporation System and method for transmitting a digital image over a communication network
6337929, Sep 29 1997 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and method and storing medium
6339657, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image compression of a facial region by adaptive quantization based on resolution
6430713, Jun 30 1999 LinkedIn Corporation System and method for constructing low complexity block coders
6529634, Nov 08 1999 Qualcomm Incorporated Contrast sensitive variance based adaptive block size DCT image compression
6539119, Aug 30 1993 Sony Corporation Picture coding apparatus and method thereof
6577772, Dec 23 1998 LG Electronics Inc. Pipelined discrete cosine transform apparatus
6584230, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image decoding of image content within a boundary based on a map resolution transformed signal
6614938, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image compression with orthogonal transform of blocks within a bounded shape
6640013, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image decoding using a shape map
6697531, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image coding and decoding using a position and shape map
6711299, Mar 11 1997 UPLOAD TECHNOLOGIES, S A Wavelet transformation of dithered quantized/reduced color pixels for color bit depth image compression and decompression
6714684, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Subband image compression of blocks within a bounded shape using a resolution transform
6826308, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method and apparatus for image encoding and decoding using a shape and position map
6853755, Mar 28 2001 Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for adaptive compression of scanned documents
6859563, Mar 30 2001 RICOH CO , LTD Method and apparatus for decoding information using late contexts
6868184, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method and apparatus for image coding and/or decoding using a position and shape map
6870963, Jun 15 2001 Qualcomm, Inc.; Qualcomm Incorporated Configurable pattern optimizer
6873734, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Corporation Method and apparatus for compression using reversible wavelet transforms and an embedded codestream
6895120, Mar 30 2001 RICOH CO , LTD 5,3 wavelet filter having three high pair and low pair filter elements with two pairs of cascaded delays
6898323, Feb 15 2001 RICOH CO LTD Memory usage scheme for performing wavelet processing
6898325, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method and apparatus for clipping coefficient values after application of each wavelet transform
6904175, Mar 11 1997 UPLOAD TECHNOLOGIES, S A Image compression using an interger reversible wavelet transform with a property of precision preservation
6904178, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for eliminating flicker by quantizing values based on previous quantization
6925209, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for outputting a codestream as multiple tile-part outputs with packets from tiles being output in each tile-part
6947874, Nov 16 2000 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Entropy coding
6950558, Mar 30 2001 RICOH CO , LTD , A CORPORATION OF JAPAN Method and apparatus for block sequential processing
6973217, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for sending additional sideband information in a codestream
6975773, Jul 30 2002 Qualcomm Incorporated; QUALCOMM INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORPORATION Parameter selection in data compression and decompression
6983075, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd Method and apparatus for performing selective quantization by manipulation of refinement bits
6990247, Sep 20 1994 Ricoh Corporation Multiple coder technique
6996283, Nov 16 2001 Qualcomm Incorporated Block size assignment using local contrast ratio
7003168, Mar 11 1997 UPLOAD TECHNOLOGIES, S A Image compression and decompression based on an integer wavelet transform using a lifting scheme and a correction method
7006697, Mar 30 2001 RICOH CO , LTD Parallel block MQ arithmetic image compression of wavelet transform coefficients
7016545, Sep 21 1994 RICOH CORPORATION, LTD A CORPORATION OF JAPAN Reversible embedded wavelet system implementation
7024046, Apr 18 2000 IDX Investment Corporation System and method for the lossless progressive streaming of images over a communication network
7054493, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Context generation
7054495, Nov 10 1994 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image data coding and/or decoding system capable of high-efficient coding
7062101, Mar 30 2001 RICOH CO , LTD Method and apparatus for storing bitplanes of coefficients in a reduced size memory
7062103, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for specifying quantization based upon the human visual system
7068849, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Corporation Method and apparatus for compression using reversible wavelet transforms and an embedded codestream
7072520, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for selecting layers for quantization based on sideband information
7076104, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Corporation Compression and decompression with wavelet style and binary style including quantization by device-dependent parser
7079690, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for editing an image while maintaining codestream size
7088858, Dec 17 1999 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Digital signal coding with division into tiles
7088869, Mar 30 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. 5,3 wavelet filter having three high pair and low pair filter elements with two pairs of cascaded delays
7095900, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for performing scalar quantization with a power of two step size
7095907, Jan 10 2002 RICOH CO LTD A CORPRORATION OF JAPAN Content and display device dependent creation of smaller representation of images
7120305, Apr 16 2002 RICOH CO , LTD Adaptive nonlinear image enlargement using wavelet transform coefficients
7139434, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Decoding with storage of less bits for less important data
7164804, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for eliminating flicker by quantizing values based on previous quantization
7167589, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Disk read technique
7167592, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for compression using reversible wavelet transforms and an embedded codestream
7215820, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for compression using reversible wavelet transforms and an embedded codestream
7221761, Sep 18 2000 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Error resilient digital video scrambling
7227999, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Printing system application using J2K
7280252, Dec 19 2001 RICOH CO , LTD Error diffusion of multiresolutional representations
7289677, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Reversible embedded wavelet system implementation
7298912, Mar 30 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for assigning codeblocks to coders operating in parallel
7315648, Dec 17 1999 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Digital signal coding with division into tiles
7321695, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Encoder rate control
7376279, Dec 14 2000 IDX Investment Corporation Three-dimensional image streaming system and method for medical images
7382968, Feb 21 2002 Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC Recording apparatus and computer-readable program
7388993, Jul 30 2002 Qualcomm Incorporated Parameter selection in data compression and decompression
7397963, Mar 30 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for storing bitplanes of coefficients in a reduced size memory
7418142, Sep 20 1994 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method for compression using reversible embedded wavelets
7454074, Apr 18 2000 General Electric Company System and method for the lossless progressive streaming of images over a communication network
7457473, Mar 30 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method for block sequential processing
7474791, Jan 10 2002 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Content and display device dependent creation of smaller representations of images
7477792, Feb 15 2001 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for performing progressive order conversion
7580584, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive multiple quantization
7581027, Jun 27 2001 RICOH CO , LTD JPEG 2000 for efficent imaging in a client/server environment
7593582, Jul 30 2002 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods using parameter selection in data compression and decompression
7602851, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Intelligent differential quantization of video coding
7630563, Jul 19 2001 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method for decoding digital image and audio data in a lossless manner
7634145, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Corporation Compression and decompression with wavelet style and binary style including quantization by device-dependent parser
7738554, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC DC coefficient signaling at small quantization step sizes
7801383, May 15 2004 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Embedded scalar quantizers with arbitrary dead-zone ratios
7813564, Mar 30 2007 Monument Peak Ventures, LLC Method for controlling the amount of compressed data
7974340, Apr 07 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive B-picture quantization control
7995649, Apr 07 2006 ZHIGU HOLDINGS LIMITED Quantization adjustment based on texture level
8031955, Apr 03 2006 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Image processing apparatus, image processing method, medium storing program, and computer data signal
8059721, Apr 07 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Estimating sample-domain distortion in the transform domain with rounding compensation
8130828, Apr 07 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adjusting quantization to preserve non-zero AC coefficients
8131095, Feb 03 2003 NINTENDO EUROPEAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Process and device for the compression of portions of images
8184694, May 05 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Harmonic quantizer scale
8189933, Mar 31 2008 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Classifying and controlling encoding quality for textured, dark smooth and smooth video content
8218624, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Fractional quantization step sizes for high bit rates
8224105, Oct 27 2008 PANASONIC SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS CO , LTD Method for coding image, image coding device and image pickup system
8238424, Feb 09 2007 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Complexity-based adaptive preprocessing for multiple-pass video compression
8243797, Mar 30 2007 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Regions of interest for quality adjustments
8244033, May 13 2008 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image encoding apparatus, image decoding apparatus, and control method thereof
8249145, Apr 27 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Estimating sample-domain distortion in the transform domain with rounding compensation
8331438, Jun 05 2007 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive selection of picture-level quantization parameters for predicted video pictures
8358864, Jun 11 2009 Sony Corporation Image processing apparatus and image processing method
8422546, May 25 2005 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive video encoding using a perceptual model
8442337, Apr 18 2007 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Encoding adjustments for animation content
8472741, Jun 11 2009 Sony Corporation Image processing apparatus and image processing method
8498335, Mar 26 2007 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive deadzone size adjustment in quantization
8503536, Apr 07 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Quantization adjustments for DC shift artifacts
8565298, Sep 21 1994 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Encoder rate control
8576908, Mar 30 2007 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Regions of interest for quality adjustments
8588298, May 05 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Harmonic quantizer scale
8638864, Jul 16 1997 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor
8711925, May 05 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Flexible quantization
8743949, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding / decoding with re-oriented transforms and sub-block transform sizes
8767822, Apr 07 2006 ZHIGU HOLDINGS LIMITED Quantization adjustment based on texture level
8798159, Oct 23 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for encoding video and method and apparatus for decoding video, based on hierarchical structure of coding unit
8817868, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Sub-block transform coding of prediction residuals
8873643, Jul 16 1997 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor
8891618, Oct 23 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for encoding video and method and apparatus for decoding video, based on hierarchical structure of coding unit
8891631, Oct 23 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for encoding video and method and apparatus for decoding video, based on hierarchical structure of coding unit
8891632, Oct 23 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for encoding video and method and apparatus for decoding video, based on hierarchical structure of coding unit
8897359, Jun 03 2008 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive quantization for enhancement layer video coding
8897369, Oct 23 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for encoding video and method and apparatus for decoding video, based on hierarchical structure of coding unit
8908768, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding / decoding with motion resolution switching and sub-block transform sizes
8942296, Jul 16 1997 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor
8989274, Oct 23 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for encoding video and method and apparatus for decoding video, based on hierarchical structure of coding unit
9060163, Jul 16 1997 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor
9060181, Jul 16 1997 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor
9077959, Jul 16 1997 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor
9185418, Jun 03 2008 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive quantization for enhancement layer video coding
9258570, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding / decoding with re-oriented transforms and sub-block transform sizes
9264705, Jul 16 1997 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor
9264714, Jun 11 2009 Sony Corporation Image processing apparatus and image processing method
9300972, Feb 09 2009 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD Video encoding method and apparatus using low-complexity frequency transformation, and video decoding method and apparatus
9313509, Jul 18 2003 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC DC coefficient signaling at small quantization step sizes
9414055, Oct 23 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for encoding video and method and apparatus for decoding video, based on hierarchical structure of coding unit
9414089, Jun 11 2009 Sony Corporation Image processing apparatus and image processing method
9432686, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding / decoding with motion resolution switching and sub-block transform sizes
9456216, Dec 17 2001 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Sub-block transform coding of prediction residuals
9485512, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
9571840, Jun 03 2008 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Adaptive quantization for enhancement layer video coding
9635368, Jun 07 2009 LG Electronics Inc Method and apparatus for decoding a video signal
9838719, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
9838720, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
9838721, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
9838722, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
9888259, Feb 23 2009 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Korean Broadcasting System Video encoding method for encoding division block, video decoding method for decoding division block, and recording medium for implementing the same
9967561, May 05 2006 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Flexible quantization
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4261018, Jun 18 1979 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Progressive image transmission
4831659, Oct 28 1985 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for image data coding
4944023, May 19 1987 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method of describing image information
4947447, Apr 24 1986 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for data coding
5021891, Feb 27 1990 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED A CORPORATION OF DELAWARE Adaptive block size image compression method and system
5060285, May 19 1989 Verizon Laboratories Inc Hierarchical variable block size address-vector quantization using inter-block correlation
//////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Mar 23 1992Bell Communications Research, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Mar 16 1999BELL COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH, INC Telcordia Technologies, IncCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0102630311 pdf
Mar 15 2005Telcordia Technologies, IncJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0158860001 pdf
Jun 29 2007JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTTelcordia Technologies, IncTERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS0195200174 pdf
Jun 29 2007Telcordia Technologies, IncWILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0195620309 pdf
Feb 20 2009Wilmington Trust CompanyTelcordia Technologies, IncRELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST0224080410 pdf
Mar 13 2009CHEN, CHENG-TIEBELL COMMUNICATIONS, RESEARCH, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0223900907 pdf
Jun 16 2009Telcordia Technologies, IncTelcordia Licensing Company LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0228780821 pdf
Jan 28 2010Telcordia Licensing Company LLCTTI Inventions C LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0253310674 pdf
Apr 30 2010WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, AS COLLATERAL AGENTTelcordia Technologies, IncRELEASE0245150622 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Dec 08 1995ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Jan 08 1997M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Feb 14 2001M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Feb 22 2005M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.
Nov 05 2009ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Nov 05 2009RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Aug 31 19964 years fee payment window open
Mar 03 19976 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Aug 31 1997patent expiry (for year 4)
Aug 31 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Aug 31 20008 years fee payment window open
Mar 03 20016 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Aug 31 2001patent expiry (for year 8)
Aug 31 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Aug 31 200412 years fee payment window open
Mar 03 20056 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Aug 31 2005patent expiry (for year 12)
Aug 31 20072 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)