A method of manufacturing a web of fibers, especially a web of paper. The pulp is uniformly distributed through an outlet over the width of the machine and along a wire or between two wires. Most of the moisture is subsequently extracted from the pulp accommodated on or between the wires at a draining point. Various amounts of retaining agents are added to the pulp at sections across the headbox and the web in order to control the level of retention sectionally.

Patent
   5401363
Priority
Nov 05 1992
Filed
Nov 05 1993
Issued
Mar 28 1995
Expiry
Nov 05 2013
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
16
7
all paid
1. Method for operating a headbox of a paper making machine, comprising the steps of:
feeding a plurality of mixers of the headbox with a first stream of paper stock and selectively feeding the mixers with a second stream of retaining agent;
feeding mixed contents of each of the mixers to a respective stock holding compartment of a plurality of stock compartments arrayed across a width dimension of the headbox; and
controlling the amount of retaining agent flowing into each of the mixers to achieve uniform retention characteristics across an entire paper web formed by stock sprayed from the headbox.
7. A headbox for a paper making machine, the headbox comprising:
a plurality of mixers each including means to receive a first stream of paper stock and a second stream of retaining agent, each of the mixers being effective to mix stock and retaining agent;
a stock holder comprising a plurality of compartments, each compartment being connected to receive admixed contents of a respective one of the mixers, the compartments being arrayed across a width dimension of the headbox; and
means for controlling the amount, if any, of the retaining agent flowing into each of the mixers to achieve uniform retention characteristics across an entire paper web formed by stock sprayed from the headbox.
2. The method of claim 1, including feeding the stock from the stock compartments into a further section of the headbox in which the stock is subjected to microscopic-scale turbulence.
3. The method of claim 2, including feeding the stock from the further section to a projection slice and releasing the stock from the projection slice over the entire width of a forming wire of the paper making machine.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the retaining agent has a molecular structure which is long-chained as compared to water molecules.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the retaining agent comprises at least one compound selected from the group consisting of polyacrylamide, polyamine, and polyethylene amine.
6. The method of claim 1, including providing a respective valve in a feeding path of the retaining agent to the mixer and including controlling the setting of the valve.
8. The headbox of claim 7, further comprising a supply of paper stock and a supply of retaining agent, wherein the retaining agent comprises at least one compound selected from the group consisting of polyacrylamide, polyamine, and polyethylene amine.
9. The headbox of claim 7, further comprising a further section of the headbox which is coupled to the compartments and means in the further section to cause microscopic-scale turbulence in the stock.
10. The headbox of claim 9, further including a projection slice coupled to the further section and means to release stock from the projection slice over the entire width of a forming wire used to form the paper web.
11. The headbox of claim 10, further including a respective valve associated with each of the mixers for controlling therewith the amount, if any, of retaining agent that is to be supplied to each respective mixer.

The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a web of paper with a headbox.

A headbox establishes the density and transverse fiber orientation of a pulp suspension at a point at least just upstream of the outlet gap from the headbox to attempt to achieve a paper weight per area and transverse fiber orientation which are satisfactory and constant over the entire width of the web. A headbox simultaneously also ensures that the constitution of the web is homogeneous. The constitution of the paper web is comprised of concentrations of its individual constituents, such as long and short fibers, fillers, etc.

The composition of a web of paper transversely to its length direction, i.e. across a web being produced, can be influenced by the process known from German Patent 3,514,554, for example. This patent describes varying the density of the pulp at particular points when necessary. But, no description is provided about how this is to be done.

German Patent 4,019,593 A1 describes varying the concentration CM of the particular sectional stream and accordingly of the material flowing out of the particular mixer in the event of deviations in weight at a particular point along the width of the web. To attain this, the ratio QH /QL of the volumes of control streams supplied to the mixer is varied. It is difficult, however, with conventional valves to prevent the sectional stream QH leaving the mixer from deviating unintentionally and wildly from an ideal concentration.

German Application OS 3,538,466 describes varying the flow through one section of a headbox to control the angle of fiber orientation where the pulp leaves the headbox. Fiber orientation will also vary wildly when the volume of a sectional stream deviates wildly from the ideal orientation.

German Patent 2,942,966 and OS 3,538,466 disclose varying the width of the outlet gap or slice or slot of the headbox with threaded spindles that pivot or curve the upper blade of the outlet gap, for example. This approach can vary the local flow of suspension and hence the fiber orientation. Local narrowing of the gap changes the direction in which the fibers are flowing at the constricted points as compared with other points across the gap. This means that, although the weight of the web can be made uniform over the width of the headbox outlet by this "displacement", the generally necessary overall orientation of the fibers in the web will be disrupted.

It is an object of the present invention to control the constitution of a web traveling through a paper making machine such that it will approach the ideal as nearly as possible.

The object is attained by uniformly distributing the pulp through a headbox outlet and across the width of the web and adding various amounts of a retaining, i.e. loosely binding, agent to the web at various sections thereof in order to control the level of retention, i.e. binding, of the constituents of the web at various sections of and across the web.

The inventors realized that variations in retention produce a non-uniform distribution of weight throughout a web traveling through a paper-making machine, but that this situation can be controlled by adding a liquid that differs in its properties from the pulp in the major stream. Adding pulp with a high proportion of long fibers or ash to the edges of the web, for example, can help to improve the transverse constitution. This goal had been achieved in the prior art by varying the blend or by sectional density variations with the object of attaining the best possible distribution of weight. When the web is drained in the forming section, in accordance with the degree of retention, short fibers and ash will have a greater tendency to drop through the meshes of the wire along with the water. Thus, even though the transverse distribution of weight has been successfully corrected, the transverse constitution will not be homogeneous and hence not ideal.

Deviations from mean retention are accordingly restricted according to the invention by the addition of a retaining agent at sections across the headbox outlet and the web to limit the changes in the paper's properties at points of extreme deviations. Examples of such retaining agent include polyacrylamide, polyamine, and polyethylene amine.

The method is applicable to all types of headboxes (single-layer and multiple-layer or multiple-ply headboxes, gap-shaper headboxes, long-wire headboxes, etc.).

Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention which refers to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates the main structural blocks of a headbox for practicing the present invention.

With reference to FIG. 1, which is a schematic top view of a headbox, several pairs of lines Ri, Si lead into the mixers M as shown. In each pair, the line Si supplies stock Si to its respective mixer M. The other line Ri supplies a retainer Ri to its respective mixer through a valve V, at a rate which is controlled by the valve.

Each mixer M mixes the stock with the retainer and supplies the mixture to a respective compartment in a section S of the headbox. The compartments in section S are defined and separated from one another by the partitions W. Immediately downstream of the section S is a section T that generates the requisite microscopic-scale turbulence, in a manner well known in the art. Immediately downstream of the section T is a projection slice that releases the stock over the total width of the forming wire (not shown), again in a manner well known in the art.

The retaining agent flows, as noted, through the valves V which are integrated into the lines supplying the retainer. Accordingly, these valves regulate how much retainer enters the system in accordance with how much retention, i.e. binding, is needed at each point across the width of the web. As retaining/binding agents, one may use polyacrylamide, polyamine, polyethylene amine which are but examples of the type of retaining agents to be used. These retainers are constituted, in contrast to the water in the suspension, of long-chained molecules. In accordance with the process of the present invention, the retaining agents are added to those sections of the paper web and in an amount which is sufficient to inhibit or reduce the loss of too many accepts, i.e. fines, from the web. The level of fines across the machine is measured and the retaining agent is added to the compartments where an insufficient amount of fines remains in the paper web.

The result of injecting the retaining agent is that fewer fines drain out along with the water as the web forms. The inventors believe that the physical mechanism at play which achieves the salutary effects of the present invention is the construction of polymeric bridges between the fibers or neutralization of charges on the fibers to thereby enhance the forces of adhesion between the fiber parts resulting in a reduced loss of fines.

One drawback to the addition of the retaining agents and a factor behind the prior art's reluctance to introduce such retainers is that it promotes flocculation, which interferes with the formation of the web. Therefore, in order to achieve the beneficial results of the present invention, one skilled in the art must determine on a case-by-case basis how much flocculation is to be tolerated in order to obtain the positive results of improving distribution of the filler throughout the web.

A primary advantage of the present invention derives from the fact that it allows the constitution of the web to be as homogeneous as possible from one end thereof to the other, across its entire width.

The sheet-forming wire sometimes wears out at one edge for example, which results in variations in the stock retention across the web. This defect is usually corrected by adjusting the baffle slice to release more stock to those areas of the wire where retention is low in order to compensate for the loss of fillers. However, adjusting the baffle slice leads to problems with the orientation of the fibers in the web, because opening and closing the gap in the baffle slice can lead to undesirable transverse flow.

Consistent with the aim of the present invention to render retention as uniform as possible over the entire width of the machine while avoiding excessive manipulation of the baffle slice, homogeneous retention with the present invention is ensured by applying/supplying the retaining agent, compartment by compartment, eliminating the need for too many adjustments of the baffle slice and hence poor fiber orientation.

Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.

Ruf, Wolfgang, Begemann, Ulrich, Heinzmann, Helmut

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10213532, Nov 20 2003 The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Portable hand pump for evacuation of fluids
10946123, Oct 12 2004 Merit Medical Systems, Inc Corporeal drainage system
11441268, Jan 05 2018 International Paper Company Paper products having increased bending stiffness and cross-direction strength and methods for making the same
5603806, Jun 01 1995 Valmet Corporation Method and apparatus for lateral alignment of the cross-direction quality profile of a web in a paper machine
5746889, Oct 18 1996 Valmet Corporation Stock feed system for a multi-layer headbox and method in the operation of a multi-layer headbox
5958189, Mar 20 1995 Voith Sulzer Papiermaschinen GmbH Wet part of a paper making machine
6099689, Feb 17 1998 Ecolab USA Inc Production of paper and board products with improved retention, drainage and formation
6113741, Dec 06 1996 EKA CHEMICALS, AB Process for the production of paper
6117272, Sep 03 1998 Voith Sulzer Papiermaschinen Device and process for metering auxiliary materials into the flow box of a paper machine
6210535, Jun 01 1995 Valmet Corporation Stock feed system for a multi-layer headbox and method in the operation of a multi-layer headbox
6270624, Oct 29 1993 Valmet Corporation Stock feed system for a multi-layer headbox and method in the operation of a multi-layer headbox
6299731, Sep 24 1998 Voith Sulzer Papiertechnik Patent GmbH Process and headbox system for improving consistency cross-direction profile of fiber web
6303001, Sep 24 1998 Voith Sulzer Papiertechnik Patent GmbH Process for improving the shrinkage cross direction profile and paper having an improved cross
6471827, Nov 26 1998 VALMET TECHNOLOGIES, INC Method and device for measurement of the retention profile and for control of the retention in a paper/board machine
6627042, May 05 2000 Voith Paper Patent GmbH Process for the formation of a multi-ply and/or multilayer fiber web
6733627, Jun 29 1999 PIXELLE SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC FORMERLY KNOWN AS SPARTAN PAPER LLC Method for manufacturing paper having variable characteristics
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2693415,
3589980,
4294656, Oct 14 1977 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Process for measuring the state of charge of suspensions and for controlling the addition of auxiliary agents to the suspensions
4517285, Oct 20 1982 WIGGINS TEAPE GROUP LIMITED, THE A CORP OF ENGLAND Papermaking of polyolefin coated supports by controlling streaming potential
4940512, Aug 18 1988 E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, A CORP OF DE Cross-directional distribution of additives in synthetic papers
4952280, Jul 06 1988 BASF Aktiengesellschaft Process for controlling the addition of retention aids in papermaking
SU718518,
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 03 1993BEGEMANN, ULRICHJ M VOITH GMBHASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0068240515 pdf
Nov 04 1993HEINZMANN, HELMUTJ M VOITH GMBHASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0068240515 pdf
Nov 05 1993J. M. Voith GmbH(assignment on the face of the patent)
Nov 05 1993RUF, WOLFGANGJ M VOITH GMBHASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0068240515 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Aug 27 1998M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 10 1998ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Aug 26 2002M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
May 21 2004ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
May 21 2004RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Sep 14 2006M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Mar 28 19984 years fee payment window open
Sep 28 19986 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 28 1999patent expiry (for year 4)
Mar 28 20012 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Mar 28 20028 years fee payment window open
Sep 28 20026 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 28 2003patent expiry (for year 8)
Mar 28 20052 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Mar 28 200612 years fee payment window open
Sep 28 20066 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 28 2007patent expiry (for year 12)
Mar 28 20092 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)