An electronic engine controller limits the maximum temperature of a midbed point within a catalytic converter by determining an instantaneous temperature of the midbed point as a function of a temperature of exhaust gas at an exhaust flange, of a temperature variation of exhaust gas from the exhaust flange and exhaust gas inlet to the catalytic converter, of exhaust gas at an exhaust gas inlet to the catalytic converter, and as a function of a predetermined value indicative of a temperature rise of exhaust gas in the catalytic converter. The temperature is compared to a maximum midbed temperature range and a first air/fuel modulation variable is altered by a predetermined amount if the temperature of the midbed point is within the maximum midbed temperature range and the first air/fuel modulation variable is set to a predetermined value if the midbed temperature is below the maximum midbed temperature range. The first air/fuel modulation variable is compared to a second air/fuel modulation variable which corresponds to an air/fuel ratio required to produce a predetermined engine response and the rate of fuel delivery to the engine is altered to generate an air/fuel ratio corresponding to the air/fuel modulation variable which represents the richer air/fuel mixture.
|
1. A method of limiting a maximum temperature of a catalytic converter which chemically alters an exhaust gas produced by combustion of an air/fuel mixture in an internal combustion engine, the method comprising the steps of:
determining an instantaneous temperature of a midbed point within said catalytic converter, generating a first air/fuel modulation variable indicative of a ratio of air to fuel in an air/fuel mixture required to alter the temperature of the midbed point by a predetermined amount, generating a second air/fuel modulation variable indicative of a ratio of air to fuel in an air/fuel mixture required to generate a predetermined engine response for a predetermined set of engine operating parameters, comparing said first air/fuel modulation variable to said second air/fuel modulation variable and injecting an amount of fuel to generate an air/fuel mixture-corresponding to said first air/fuel modulation variable if said first air/fuel modulation variable corresponds to a lesser proportion of air to fuel in said air/fuel mixture than said second air/fuel modulation variable and injecting an amount of fuel to generate an air/fuel mixture corresponding to said second air/fuel modulation variable if said first air/fuel modulation variable corresponds to a greater proportion of air to fuel than said second air/fuel modulation variable.
8. A method of limiting a maximum temperature in a catalytic converter which alters exhaust gases produced by combustion of an air/fuel mixture in an internal combustion engine which includes an exhaust pipe for transporting exhaust gases produced by the engine into a catalytic converter, the method comprising the steps of:
determining an instantaneous temperature value at a midbed point in said catalytic converter by the steps of, determining an instantaneous temperature of exhaust gas at a first point on said exhaust pipe as a function of a first value indicative of a steady state temperature at the first point and as a function of a second value indicative of a predetermined temperature rate of change at the first point; measuring a mass flow rate of air into an induction system of said engine; determining an instantaneous temperature of exhaust gas at an exhaust gas inlet of said catalytic converter as a function of the instantaneous temperature at said first point and a third value indicative of a steady state temperature drop of said exhaust gas from said first point to said exhaust gas inlet; determining a steady state temperature at a midbed point in said catalytic converter as a function of said instantaneous temperature of exhaust gas at said exhaust gas inlet and a fourth value indicative of an increase in temperature of said exhaust gas in said catalytic converter; determining said instantaneous temperature value at said midbed point as a function of said steady state temperature at said midbed point and a predetermined temperature rate of change of the midbed point which varies as a function of said mass flow rate of air; and controlling said air/fuel ratio in response to said instantaneous midbed temperature to maintain said midbed temperature within a predetermined midbed temperature range.
13. In an internal combustion engine comprising a means for generating an air/fuel mixture for combustion within said engine and an exhaust pipe for transporting exhaust gases produced from said combustion of said air/fuel mixture to a catalytic converter, a method of controlling delivery of fuel to a combustion chamber of the engine to generate said air/fuel mixture, which comprises a ratio of air to fuel required to maintain said catalytic converter within a predetermined temperature range, the method comprising the steps of:
determining an instantaneous temperature value at a midbed point in said catalytic converter; altering said air/fuel mixture by the steps of, comparing said instantaneous temperature value to a predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature range comprising a maximum temperature value and a minimum temperature value and setting a temperature flag to indicate an overtemperature condition if said instantaneous temperature value is greater than said maximum temperature value and setting said temperature flag to indicate an undertemperature condition if said instantaneous temperature value is less than said minimum temperature value; setting a first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable equal to a predetermined air/fuel modulation value if said temperature flag indicates said undertemperature condition; altering said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by an air/fuel modulation alteration value if said temperature flag indicates said overtemperature condition; generating a second intermediate air/fuel modulation variable indicative of a ratio of air to fuel in an air/fuel mixture required to generate a predetermined engine response for a predetermined set of engine operating parameters, comparing said second intermediate air/fuel modulation variable to said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable and injecting an amount of fuel to generate an air/fuel ratio corresponding to said second intermediate air/fuel modulation variable if said first air/fuel modulation variable corresponds to a greater proportion of air to fuel than said second air/fuel modulation variable, and injecting an amount of fuel to generate an air/fuel ratio corresponding to said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable if said first air/fuel modulation variable corresponds to a lesser proportion of air to fuel than said second air/fuel modulation variable. 2. The method as set forth in
determining an instantaneous temperature of exhaust gas at a first point on an exhaust pipe, which transports exhaust gas from the engine to the catalytic converter, as a function of a first value indicative of a steady state temperature at the first point and as a function of a second value indicative of a predetermined temperature rate of change at the first point; measuring a mass flow rate of air into an induction system of said engine; determining an instantaneous temperature of exhaust gas at an exhaust gas inlet of said catalytic converter as a function of the instantaneous temperature at said first point and a third value indicative of a steady state temperature drop of said exhaust gas from said first point to said exhaust gas inlet; determining a steady state temperature at a midbed point in said catalytic converter as a function of said instantaneous temperature at said exhaust gas inlet and a fourth value indicative of an increase in temperature of said exhaust gas in said catalytic converter; and determining the instantaneous temperature at the midbed point as a function of said steady state temperature at said midbed point and a predetermined temperature rate of change at the midbed point which varies as a function of said mass flow rate of air.
3. The method as set forth in
4. The method as set forth in
comparing said temperature of said midbed point to a predetermined maximum temperature range comprising a maximum temperature value and a minimum temperature value and setting a temperature flag to indicate an overtemperature condition if said temperature of said midbed point is greater than said maximum temperature value and setting said temperature flag to indicate an undertemperature condition if said temperature of said midbed point is less than said minimum temperature value; setting said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable equal to a predetermined air/fuel modulation value if said temperature flag indicates said undertemperature condition; and altering said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by an air/fuel modulation alteration value if said temperature flag indicates said overtemperature condition.
5. The method as set forth in
calculating a steady state temperature value indicative of a steady state temperature at said midbed point in said catalytic converter, comparing said steady state temperature value to said maximum temperature value and if said steady state temperature value is greater than said maximum midbed temperature value then decrementing said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by said air/fuel alteration value, and if said steady state temperature value is less than or equal to said maximum temperature value then, generating a third intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by incrementing said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by said air/fuel alteration value, calculating an estimated temperature value at said midbed point in said catalytic converter which corresponds to an air/fuel ratio generated from said third intermediate air/fuel modulation variable, and comparing said estimated temperature value to said maximum temperature value and setting said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable equal to said third intermediate air/fuel modulation variable if said estimated temperature value is less than or equal to said maximum temperature value. 6. The method as set forth in
7. The method as set forth in
determining a fifth value indicative of an average value of exhaust gas temperature from the first point to the exhaust gas inlet of the catalytic converter, determining, as a function of said fifth value and a value indicative of an ambient temperature, a sixth value indicative of a temperature difference between the exhaust gas temperature at the first point and the ambient temperature, retrieving a seventh predetermined value, indicative of a temperature drop of exhaust gas between the first point and the exhaust gas inlet of the catalytic converter, and determining the third value as a function of the sixth value and the seventh predetermined value.
9. The method as set forth in
10. The method as set forth in
11. The method as set forth in
12. The method as set forth in
14. The method as set forth in
determining an initial temperature value of said midbed point as a function of a temperature value indicative of the midbed temperature when the engine was last turned off, a time constant indicative of a rate of cooling of the catalyst midbed, and as a function of a value indicative of the amount of time the engine was turned off.
15. The method as set forth in
calculating a steady state temperature value indicative of a temperature at said midbed point in said catalytic converter, comparing said steady state temperature value to said predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature value and if said steady state temperature value is greater than said predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature value then decrementing said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by said air/fuel alteration value, and if said steady state temperature value is less than or equal to said predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature value then, generating a third intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by incrementing said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable by said air/fuel alteration value, calculating an estimated temperature value at said midbed point in said catalytic converter which corresponds to an air/fuel ratio generated from said third intermediate air/fuel modulation variable, and comparing said estimated temperature value to said predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature value and setting said first intermediate air/fuel modulation variable equal to said third intermediate air/fuel modulation variable if said estimated temperature value is less than said predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature value. |
This invention relates to methods and apparatus for determining a midbed temperature of a catalytic converter and for controlling the delivery of fuel to an internal combustion engine to maintain the midbed temperature below a predetermined maximum temperature.
Modern automotive engines typically utilize a catalytic converter to reduce the exhaust gas emissions produced by the engine. Such converters operate to chemically alter the exhaust gas composition produced by the engine to help meet various environmental regulations governing tailpipe emissions. Catalytic converters typically operate at peak efficiency when the temperature of the catalytic material within the converter is within a certain specified temperature range. Continued operation of the converter at a temperature greater than the specified temperature range, however, leads to degradation of the catalyst material within the converter. Such degradation leads to reduced converter operating life and to increased tailpipe emissions.
Accordingly, there exists a need to accurately determine the operating temperature of a catalytic converter and to limit the temperature of the converter during vehicle operation.
It is an object of the present invention to increase the operating life of a catalytic converter on a vehicle engine by determining the temperature of the catalytic material within the converter and maintaining the temperature of the catalytic material below a predetermined maximum operating temperature.
In accordance with the present invention, the above object is achieved by determining a temperature of a midbed point within the catalytic converter, generating a first air/fuel modulation variable indicative of a ratio of air to fuel in an air/fuel mixture required to alter the temperature of the midbed point by a predetermined amount and generating a second air/fuel modulation variable indicative of a ratio of air to fuel in an air/fuel mixture required to generate a predetermined engine response for a predetermined set of engine operating parameters. The first air/fuel modulation variable is then compared to the second air/fuel modulation variable and an amount of fuel to generate an air/fuel mixture corresponding to the first air/fuel modulation variable is injected if the first air/fuel modulation variable corresponds to a lesser proportion of air to fuel in the air/fuel mixture than the second air/fuel modulation variable. An amount of fuel to generate an air/fuel mixture corresponding to the second air/fuel modulation variable is injected if the first air/fuel modulation variable corresponds to a greater proportion of air to fuel than the second air/fuel modulation variable.
An advantage of at least certain preferred embodiments is that tailpipe emissions and the cost of vehicle maintenance are decreased by operating the catalytic converter below a maximum operating temperature.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention may be better understood by considering the following detailed description of certain preferred embodiments of the invention. In the course of this description, reference will be made to the attached drawings.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a vehicle engine and an electronic engine controller which embody the principles of the invention.
FIGS. 2 and 3(a), (b) and (c) are flowcharts showing the operation of a preferred embodiment of the invention.
In FIG. 1 of the drawings a fuel pump 12 pumps fuel from a fuel tank 10 through a fuel line 13 to a set of fuel injectors 14 which inject fuel into an internal combustion engine 11. The fuel injectors 14 are of conventional design and are positioned to inject fuel into their associated cylinder in precise quantities as determined by an electronic engine controller (EEC) 100, transmitting a fuel injector signal to the injectors 14 via signal line 17. The fuel injector signal is varied over time by EEC 100 to maintain an air/fuel ratio determined by the EEC 100. The fuel tank 10 advantageously contains liquid fuels, such as gasoline, methanol or a combination of fuel types. An exhaust system 31, comprising one or more exhaust pipes and an exhaust flange seen at 75, transports exhaust gas produced from combustion of an air/fuel mixture in the engine to a first catalytic converter 32 and a second catalytic converter 33. First catalytic converter 32, which is shown in FIG. 1 in a cross-sectional view, contains a catalyst material, seen at 82 and 84, which chemically alters exhaust gas, which is produced by the engine and enters the converter 32 through exhaust gas inlet seen at 77, to generate a catalyzed exhaust gas which is then further chemically altered by second catalytic converter 33 which contains catalyst material seen at 85.
An upstream heated exhaust gas oxygen (HEGO) sensor 60, positioned upstream of the first catalytic converter 32 on the exhaust system 31 of the engine 11, detects the oxygen content of the exhaust gas generated by the engine 11, and transmits a representative signal 61 to the EEC 100. A downstream HEGO sensor 70, positioned downstream of the catalytic converter 32, detects the oxygen content of the catalyzed exhaust gas and transmits a representative signal 71 to the EEC 100. Still other sensors, indicated generally at 101, provide additional information about engine performance to the EEC 100, such as crankshaft position, angular velocity, throttle position, air temperature, etc. The information from these sensors is used by the EEC 100 to control engine operation.
A mass air flow sensor 15 positioned at the air intake of engine 11 detects the amount of air inducted into an induction system of the engine and supplies an air flow signal 16 to the EEC 100. Air flow signal 16 is utilized by EEC 100 to calculate a value termed air mass (AM) which is indicative of a mass of air flowing into the induction system in lbs./min. Air flow signal 16 is also used to calculate a value termed air charge (AIRCHG) which is indicative of air mass per cylinder filling, in units of lbs. per cylinder filling where a cylinder filling occurs once for each cylinder of the engine upon every two engine revolutions for a four-stroke engine. In another embodiment utilizing a two-stroke engine a cylinder filling occurs for each cylinder of the engine upon every engine revolution.
The EEC 100 comprises a microcomputer including a central processor unit (CPU) 41, input and output (I/O) ports 40, read only memory (ROM) 42 for storing control programs, random access memory (RAM) 43, for temporary data storage which may also be used for counters or timers, keep-alive memory (KAM) 44 for storing learned values, and a conventional data bus. EEC 100 also includes an engine off timer which generates a signal indicative of the period of time the engine was turned off. The information contained in the signal is stored in a variable termed ENG-- OFF-- TMR which is indicative of the period of time the engine was turned off.
In a preferred embodiment, the catalyst material 82 and 84 seen in first catalytic converter 32 and catalyst material 85 seen in second catalytic converter 33 each experience degradation when operated at a temperature greater than approximately 1550 degrees fahrenheit. A temperature at a midbed point, seen at 76, of the catalyst material is representative of the temperature of the catalyst material in converter 32. The midbed point is preferably located one inch from the initial point of contact of exhaust gas on the first catalyst material 82, at the axial centerline of first catalyst material 82.
In a preferred embodiment, during engine operation, the temperature of the midbed point is determined and an amount of fuel delivered by the injectors is altered to maintain the midbed temperature below a maximum temperature value, which in a certain preferred embodiment is approximately 1550 degrees fahrenheit. A preferred embodiment determines a temperature indicative of the temperature of the catalyst mass in first catalytic converter 32 and alters the rate at which fuel is delivered by injectors 14 to alter the composition of exhaust gas processed by first catalytic converter 32. In a preferred embodiment the rate of fuel delivery is increased to generate an air/fuel ratio rich of stoichiometry which results in a lower exhaust gas temperature. In another embodiment the rate of fuel delivery is gdecreased to generate an air/fuel ratio lean of stoichiometry which also results in a lower exhaust gas temperature. In such a manner the temperature of the first catalytic converter is controlled.
FIGS. 2(a) and (b) and 3(a), (b) and (c) are flowcharts showing the steps in a routine performed by the EEC 100. In a preferred embodiment, the steps shown in FIGS. 2(a) and (b) and 3(a), (b) and (c) comprise a portion of a larger routine which performs other engine control functions. FIG. 2 shows the steps in a temperature determination routine performed by EEC 100 to determine the temperature of the midbed point of the first catalytic converter 32 during engine operation.
The temperature determination routine is entered at 200 and at 201 an initialization flag EXT-- INIT is checked to determine if certain temperature variables have been initialized. A preferred embodiment advantageously initializes certain temperature variables in a manner to account for instances where an engine may be turned off for short periods of time in which the catalytic converter may not have cooled to an ambient temperature. Catalytic converter overtemperature conditions are accordingly reduced by estimating converter temperature upon engine ignition as a function of converter temperature upon engine shut off, ambient temperature, a time constant indicative of converter cooling and the time elapsed from engine shut off to subsequent engine operation. EXT-- INIT will be set to a value of one when engine power is turned on so that the temperature variables may be initialized at 202. Once the variables are initialized, EXT-- INIT is set to a value of zero and remains at such a value until engine operation is terminated. At 202 a plurality of variables to be used in the temperature determination routine are initialized as shown below: ##EQU1## where,
EXT-- FL-- KAM is a value which is stored in keep alive memory 44 and which is indicative of an instantaneous temperature of exhaust gas at exhaust flange 75. As can be seen from equations (1) and (2) above, if the engine has been turned off for a long period of time, ENG-- OFF-- TMR will contain a large value, the exponential function will result in the first additive term on the right hand side of the equation equalling zero, and the temperature of the catalyst midbed and exhaust flange will equal the ambient temperature. For shorter periods of time the exponential function FNEXP will approximate the cooling off of the catalyst midbed. Because EXT-- FL-- KAM is stored in keep alive memory 44, upon initialization EXT-- FL-- KAM will advantageously contain the temperature of exhaust gas at exhaust flange 75 when the engine was last turned off,
ENG-- OFF-- TMR is a variable which indicates the time, in seconds, that the engine has been turned off,
TC-- SOAK-- FL is a calibratable time constant, in seconds, associated with the cooling off of exhaust gas at exhaust flange 75 when the engine is turned off,
FNEXP() is a lookup table, stored in ROM 42 which approximates an exponential function for use by a fixed point processor in EEC 100,
EXT-- CMD-- KAM is an instantaneous temperature value at midbed point 76 of catalytic converter 32,
ENG-- OFF-- TMR is as previously described,
TC-- SOAK-- CMD is an empirically derived time constant, in seconds, of the cooling off of exhaust gas at the catalyst midbed,
INFAMB-- KAM is a value indicative of an estimate of ambient air temperature in degrees fahrenheit.
At 203 a steady state temperature value indicative of a steady state temperature of the exhaust flange 75 at a stoichiometric air/fuel is calculated according to the following relationship: ##EQU2## where,
FN4441(N,AIRCHG) is an empirically derived value, contained in a table indexed by engine speed, N, and aircharge, AIRCHG, which is indicative of a base steady-state exhaust flange temperature, in degrees fahrenheit at a particular engine speed and aircharge at an A/F of 14.6 A/F, 0% EGR, MBT spark, and 200 degrees fahrenheit engine coolant temperature,
FN441B(SPKMBT-SAF) is a value, contained in a table indexed by a spark delta, in degrees which is indicative of an effect of spark timing on the exhaust flange temperature,
SPKMBT is spark timing for peak thermal efficiency know as maximum spark for best torque, (MBT),
SAF is scheduled spark which may be retarded from SPKMBT for reduction of regulated emission or to prevent engine knock, the difference between SPKMBT and SAF equals a spark delta in degrees which is used to index table FN441B.
FN441I(ACF) is a unitless value, indicative of the effect of temperature of airflow into the engine, (air charge temperature or ACT) on exhaust flange temperature,
FN441C(EGRACT) is a value, contained in a table indexed by level of exhaust gas recirculation, which is indicative of the effect of exhaust gas recirculation on the exhaust flange temperature,
FN441T(AM) is a value, indexed by AM, which is indicative of a reduction in exhaust flange temperature per degree of engine coolant temperature below 200 degrees fahrenheit.
At 204 steady state temperature value EXT-- SS-- FL-- ST is adjusted by a value which is a function of an air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE in order to account for a change in exhaust temperature due to changing A/F, by the below relationship to produce a value EXT-- SS-- FLN which is indicative of steady state exhaust flange gas temperature:
EXT-- SS-- FLN=EXT-- SS-- FL-- ST*FN441A(LAMBSE) (6)
where,
EXT-- SS-- FL-- ST is as described above, and
FN44 1A(LAMBSE) is a value contained in a table, and indexed by air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE, which is indicative of the effect of LAMBSE on exhaust flange temperature.
At 205 a time constant TC-- EXT-- FLANGE which is indicative of a temperature rise of the exhaust flange 75 is calculated as a function of AM into the induction system according to the following relationship:
TC-- EXT-- FLANGE=FN442(AM) (7)
where, FN442(AM) is a value obtained from a table, indexed by AM, as previously described, and is indicative of a time constant, in seconds, of the rise in exhaust flange temperature due to a step change in instantaneous predicted exhaust flange temperature versus airmass. This time constant is associated with the heat capacity of the metal from the combustion chamber to the exhaust flange.
An instantaneous value of the exhaust flange, EXT-- FL-- KAM, is then calculated as a function of the steady state exhaust flange temperature EXT-- SS-- FL, the time constant of the temperature rise, TC-- EXT-- FLANGE and the time required for execution of the background loop BG-- TMR according to the following relationships:
EXT-- FL-- KAM=(1-FK)*EXT-- FL-- KAM+FK*EXT-- SS-- FLN (8)
where, FK performs an exponential smoothing function according to the following relationship:
FK=1/(1+TC-- EXT-- FLANGE/BG-- TMR).
At 206 a steady state temperature drop EXT-- SS-- PLOSS between exhaust flange 75 and exhaust gas inlet 77 of the first catalytic converter 32 is advantageously calculated according to the following relationship:
EXT-- SS-- PLOSS=FN445L(AM)*DELTA-- T (9)
where, FN445L(AM) is a unitless value, contained in a table indexed by mass flow rate of air AM, which is indicative of a temperature drop between exhaust flange and catalyst inlet as a function of AM, and
DELTA-- T is a value which is indicative of a temperature difference in degrees fahrenheit between the exhaust gas temperature at the exhaust flange and ambient temperature.
DELTA-- T is preferably calculated according to the following relationship:
DELTA-- T=VG-- T-INFAMB-- KAM (10)
where,
INFAMB-- KAM is as previously described, and
AVG-- T is a value indicative of an average value of exhaust gas temperature from the exhaust flange 75 to the exhaust gas inlet 77 of the first catalytic converter.
AVG-- T is preferably calculated according to the following relationship:
AVG-- T=(EXT-- FL-- KAM+EXT-- CATIN) (11)
where,
EXT-- FL-- KAM is as previously described, and
EXT-- CATIN is a value indicative*of the temperature of exhaust gas at exhaust gas inlet 77 of the first catalytic converter. The value contained in EXT-- CATIN is calculated in a manner to be described below. As can be seen from FIG. 2, in a preferred embodiment, a value of EXT-- CATIN which was calculated upon the prior execution of the steps in FIG. 2 is used in equation (11) above.
The temperature value, EXT-- CATIN is calculated at 207 as a function of the instantaneous temperature of the exhaust flange 75, EXT-- FL-- KAM and of the steady state temperature drop between exhaust flange 75 and exhaust gas inlet 77, EXT-- SS-- PLOSS as shown below:
EXT-- CATIN=EXT-- FL-- KAM-EXT-- SS-- PLOSS (12)
At 208 a value, EXT-- SS-- EXOT which is indicative of the increase in temperature of the exhaust gas in first catalytic converter 32 due to the exothermic reaction of the exhaust gas with the catalyst material 82 and 84 is calculated according to the following relationship:
EXT-- SS-- EXOT=FN448(AM)*FN448A(LAMBSE) (13)
where,
FN448(AM) is a value, contained in a table which is indexed by mass flow rate of air (AM), which is indicative of a relationship between temperature rise of exhaust gas in the catalytic converter as a function of air flow through the catalytic converter, and which preferably equals 1.0, and
FN448A(LAMBSE) is a predetermined value, in degrees fahrenheit, indicative of a steady-state increase in exhaust temperature in the catalyst, and is stored as a function of LAMBSE. A steady state temperature value, EXT-- SS-- MID which is indicative of the steady state temperature at midbed point 76 of first catalytic converter 32 is then determined at 209 by adding the value EXT-- SS-- EXOT to the value EXT-- CATIN as shown below:
EXT-- SS-- MID=EXT-- CATIN+EXT-- SS-- EXOT. (14)
At 210 an instantaneous temperature value for midbed point 76 is determined by first calculating a time constant value, TC-- EXT-- CATMID, indicative of a temperature rise of the exhaust gas in first catalytic converter 32 in seconds according to the following relationship:
TC-- EXT-- CATMID=FN449(AM) (15)
where,
FN449(AM) is a value obtained from a table, indexed by AM, and is indicative of a time constant, in seconds, of the rise in catalyst midbed temperature due to a step change in instantaneous predicted exhaust flange temperature versus airmass (AM).
The instantaneous temperature value EXT-- CMD-- KAM is then determined at 210 as a function of the steady state midbed temperature value EXT-- SS-- MID, the time constant of the temperature rise of the midbed TC-- EXT-- CATMID 10 and BG-- TMR according to the following relationship:
EXT-- CMD-- KAM (1-FK)*EXT-- CMD-- KAM+FK*EXT-- SS-- MID (16)
where,
FK performs an exponential smoothing function according to the following relationship:
FK=1/(1+TC-- EXT-- CATMID/BG-- TMR) (17)
FIGS. 3(a), (b) and (c) show the steps in an air/fuel control routine performed by EEC 100 to control the midbed temperature of the first catalytic converter 32 by altering the composition of exhaust gas which is processed by the catalytic converter 32. A preferred embodiment advantageously alters the composition of the exhaust gas by controlling fuel delivery by injectors 14 to generate an air/fuel mixture comprising a particular ratio of air and fuel which results in a particular composition of exhaust gas upon combustion. The routine is entered at 301 and at steps 302 and 304 midbed temperature EXT-- CMD-- KAM is checked to determine if it is greater than a predetermined maximum midbed temperature CAT-- MAX. At 302 instantaneous temperature value EXT-- CMD-- KAM is compared to CAT-- MAX a maximum temperature value of a temperature range within which the air/fuel mixture is altered to lower the midbed temperature, herein referred to as a maximum midbed temperature range. If the midbed temperature is lower than CAT-- MAX then an attempt to reduce the midbed temperature is not made. By reducing midbed temperature if it is within a certain range rather than above a single temperature value changes in air/fuel control are minimized, thus benefitting drivability. If EXT-- CMD-- KAM is greater than CAT-- MAX then a temperature flag EXT-- FLG is set at 303 to a value of one to indicate an overtemperature condition. If the midbed temperature EXT-- CMD-- KAM is less than CAT-- MAX then at 304 the midbed temperature EXT-- CMD-- KAM is compared to a second temperature value CAT-- MAX-- CL which defines a minimum temperature valve for the maximum midbed temperature range. If midbed temperature EXT-- CMD-- KAM is less than CAT-- MAX-- CL then at 305 temperature flag EXT-- FLG is set to a value of zero to indicate that the midbed temperature is less than the maximum midbed temperature range.
At 306 temperature flag EXT-- FLG is checked and if EXT-- FLG=0 then at 307 an air/fuel modulation variable LAM-- EXT is set to a predetermined value LAM-- EXT-- MAX and the routine proceeds to execute the steps shown in FIG. 3(c). In a preferred embodiment LAM-- EXT-- MAX has a value of 0.9. If temperature flag indicates an overtemperature condition then at 308 an open loop control flag OL-- DESIRED is set to a value of one to indicate to other routines executed by EEC 100 that the engine is to be operated under an open loop form of air/fuel control. This feature advantageously allows engine operation under closed-loop control only if the catalyst midbed temperature is below the allowable maximum temperature thus reducing the possibility of subjecting the catalyst to temperatures above the allowable maximum temperature.
At 309 a steady state value EXT-- CATMID-- SS of the midbed temperature is determined according to the following relationship and control of the routine proceeds to the steps shown in FIG. 3(b):
EXT-- CATMID-- SS=EXT-- SS-- FLN+EXT-- SS-- EXOT-EXT-- SS-- LOSS (18)
where, EXT-- CATMID-- SS, EXT-- SS-- FLN, EXT-- SS-- EXOT and EXT-- SS-- PLOSS are as described above. The steady state temperature of the midbed point of the catalytic converter EXT-- CATMID-- SS is compared to the predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature value CAT-- MAX at 322 and if the midbed temperature exceeds the predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature then at 323 the rate of fuel delivery to the engine is increased to result in a richer air/fuel ratio by decrementing first air-- fuel modulation variable LAMBSE-- EXT by a predetermined air/fuel alteration value LAM-- EXT-- STEP as shown below:
LAMBSE-- EXT=LAMBSE-- EXT-LAM-- EXT-- STEP*BG-- TMR (19)
where, LAMBSE-- EXT and LAM-- EXT-- STEP are as shown below and BG-- TMR is as previously described. As will be evident to those skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure, LAM-- EXT-- STEP allows a change in A/F to be achieved in incremental steps in order to reduce fluctuations in engine torque. LAM-- EXT-- STEP is advantageously multiplied by BG-- TMR to modify the step size LAM-- EXT-- STEP in order to account for varying execution times of the background loop. As shown at 324 and 325, the value of first air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE-- EXT is advantageously limited to a predetermined minimum value, LAMBSE-- EXT-- MIN, in order to limit the amount of fuel delivered. This advantageous feature prevents a continual increasing of the fuel delivery rate in order to lower the temperature of the catalytic converter which may be increasing because of factors which cannot be controlled by altering the composition of the exhaust gas processed by the converter. At 324 LAMBSE-- EXT is checked against LAMBSE-- EXT-- MIN and if LAMBSE-- EXT is less than LAMBSE-- EXT-- MIN then at 325 LAMBSE-- EXT is set equal to the minimum allowable value LAMBSE-- EXT-- MIN. Otherwise, if LAMBSE-- EXT is not less than the minimum allowable minimum then the routine continues to the steps shown in FIG. 3(c).
If at 322 the steady state temperature of the midbed point of the catalytic converter EXT-- CATMID-- SS is not greater than the predetermined maximum catalyst midbed temperature value CAT-- MAX then at step 326 a second, intermediate, air/fuel modulation value LAMBSE-- TRY is generated by incrementing LAMBSE-- EXT by predetermined air/fuel alteration value LAM-- EXT-- STEP as shown below:
LAMBSE-- TRY=LAMBSE-- EXT+LAMBSE-- EXT-- STEP*BG-- TMR (20)
where, LAMBSE-- TRY, LAMBSE-- EXT, LAMBSE-- EXT-- STEP and BG-- TMR are as described above.
As shown above, predetermined air/fuel alteration value LAM-- EXT-- STEP is multiplied by BG-- TMR to modify the step size LAM-- EXT-- STEP in order to account for varying execution times of the background loop. At 327 LAMBSE-- TRY is compared to a predetermined maximum value LAM-- EXT-- MAX and at 328, LAMBSE-- EXT is set equal to LAM-- EXT-- MAX if the value generated for LAMBSE-- TRY at 326 results in a value which is greater than the predetermined maximum value LAM-- EXT-- MAX. Otherwise, if the value generated at 326 for second air/fuel modulation value LAMBSE-- TRY results in a value which is within the range set by LAM-- EXT-- MAX then at 329 a catalyst midbed temperature which corresponds to an exhaust gas comprising an air/fuel ratio corresponding to the generated value of second air/fuel modulation value LAMBSE-- TRY is estimated and is compared at 330 to maximum allowable catalyst midbed temperature CAT-- MAX. This advantageous feature results in a stable A/F control system characterized by minimal A/F fluctuation by allowing the temperature of the catalytic converter to be increased if it is below the allowable maximum temperature CAT-- MAX but reducing the chances of generating an exhaust gas mixture which results in a catalytic converter greater than the allowable maximum temperature.
At 329, EXT-- MID-- TRY, the midbed temperature corresponding to an exhaust gas mixture resulting from second air/fuel variable LAMBSE-- TRY, is estimated according to the following relationship:
EXT-- MID-- TRY=CEXT-- SS-- FL-- ST*FN441A(LAMBSE-- TRY)+FN448(AM)*FN448A(LAMBSE-- TRY))-EXT-- SS-- PLOSS (21)
where,
EXT-- MID-- TRY, EXT-- SS-- FL-- ST, FN441A(LAMBSE-- TRY), FN448(AM), EXT-- SS-- PLOSS, and FN448A(LAMBSE-- TRY) are as described above.
At step 330 estimated midbed temperature EXT-- MID-- TRY is compared to allowable maximum midbed temperature CAT-- MAX and at 331 first air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE-- EXT is set equal to second air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE-- TRY if the estimated midbed temperature resulting from LAMBSE-- TRY is less than the allowable maximum midbed temperature. If at 330 the estimated temperature resulting from LAMBSE-- TRY is determined to be greater than the allowable maximum midbed temperature then the existing value of LAMBSE-- EXT is maintained, i.e. to the value determined in the prior execution of the air/fuel control routine.
In FIG. 3(c), a 335 third air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE-- DRV is generated to determine an air/fuel ratio to enhance engine drivability. Third air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE-- DRV is preferably generated to correspond to an A/F ratio which generates a predetermined engine response for a predetermined set of engine operating parameters which includes a stoichiometric A/F ratio at partial throttle or a rich A/F ratio at a high throttle position for maximum power. LAMBSE-- DRV is preferably generated as a function of a plurality of engine operating parameters including throttle position, engine speed, mass air flow rate, engine coolant temperature and air temperature. As seen at steps 337, 338 and 339 third air/fuel modulation variable and second air/fuel modulation variable are compared and air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE is set at 338 or 339 to the lower of the second or third modulation variables. In this manner, the temperature of the catalytic converter is effectively controlled and engine drivability is enhanced by selecting a value for air/fuel modulation variable LAMBSE which corresponds to the richer of two possible air/fuel ratios. At 340 the air/fuel control routine is exited and other engine control functions are performed by EEC 100.
It is to be understood that the specific mechanisms and techniques which have been described are merely illustrative of one application of the principles of the invention. Numerous modifications may be made to the methods and apparatus described without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
De La Salle, Stephen, Weyburne, Michael A., Cullen, Michael J., Lewis, Jr., Woodrow, Martin, Todd A.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10400697, | Sep 30 2015 | Mazda Motor Corporation | Control apparatus of engine |
10543830, | Feb 25 2015 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Control strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle |
11624333, | Apr 20 2021 | DISCOVERY ENERGY, LLC | Exhaust safety system for an engine |
5497655, | Apr 06 1995 | FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION | Controlling resistance heaters on exhaust gas oxygen sensors |
5600947, | Jul 05 1995 | FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION | Method and system for estimating and controlling electrically heated catalyst temperature |
5704339, | Apr 26 1996 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | method and apparatus for improving vehicle fuel economy |
5722236, | Dec 13 1996 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Adaptive exhaust temperature estimation and control |
5729971, | Oct 23 1995 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Engine catalyst temperature estimating device and catalyst diagnostic device |
5758491, | May 22 1995 | Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Car Engineering Co., Ltd. | Diagnosing system and method of catalytic converter for controlling exhaust gas of internal combustion engine |
5832721, | Oct 15 1996 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Method and system for estimating a midbed temperature of a catalytic converter in an exhaust system having a variable length exhaust pipe |
5855113, | Mar 28 1997 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Method and system for controlling the temperature of an exhaust system having a variable length exhaust pipe |
5896743, | Jun 24 1997 | HERAEUS ELECTRO-NITE INTERNATIONAL N V A BELGIAN CORPORATION | Catalyst monitor utilizing a lifetime temperature profile for determining efficiency |
5901553, | Mar 29 1995 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Method and system for estimating temperature of a heated exhaust gas oxygen sensor in an exhaust system having a variable length pipe |
5910096, | Dec 22 1997 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Temperature control system for emission device coupled to direct injection engines |
5956941, | Oct 15 1996 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Method and system for estimating a midbed temperature of a catalytic converter |
5974785, | Jan 16 1997 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Closed loop bias air/fuel ratio offset to enhance catalytic converter efficiency |
6116083, | Jan 15 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Exhaust gas temperature estimation |
6182636, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Lean burn engine speed control |
6202406, | Mar 30 1998 | EPIQ SENSOR-NITE N V | Method and apparatus for catalyst temperature control |
6209526, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Direct injection engine system |
6219611, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Control method for engine having multiple control devices |
6244242, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Direct injection engine system and method |
6250283, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control method |
6253541, | Aug 10 1999 | FCA US LLC | Triple oxygen sensor arrangement |
6272850, | Dec 08 1998 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Catalytic converter temperature control system and method |
6279561, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Direct injection variable valve timing engine control system and method |
6286305, | Feb 23 2000 | FCA US LLC | Model based enrichment for exhaust temperature protection |
6286993, | Aug 07 1998 | DaimlerChrysler AG | Method for forming a signal representing the instantaneous temperature of a catalytic converter |
6295806, | Apr 05 2000 | FCA US LLC | Catalyst temperature model |
6295808, | Jun 29 1999 | EPIQ SENSOR-NITE N V | High driveability index fuel detection by exhaust gas temperature measurement |
6308515, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for accessing ability of lean NOx trap to store exhaust gas constituent |
6308697, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method for improved air-fuel ratio control in engines |
6324835, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Engine air and fuel control |
6327847, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method for improved performance of a vehicle |
6328015, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Engine method |
6336441, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Control method for a vehicle having an engine |
6360530, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring lean-burn engine emissions |
6363312, | Jun 29 1999 | EPIQ SENSOR-NITE N V | Method and apparatus for determining the A/F ratio of an internal combustion engine |
6374597, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for accessing ability of lean NOx trap to store exhaust gas constituent |
6389803, | Aug 02 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Emission control for improved vehicle performance |
6427437, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method for improved performance of an engine emission control system |
6434930, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling lean operation of an internal combustion engine |
6438944, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing purge fuel for purging emissions control device |
6453666, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc.; FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC , A MICHIGAN CORPORATION; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and system for reducing vehicle tailpipe emissions when operating lean |
6463733, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for optimizing open-loop fill and purge times for an emission control device |
6467259, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for operating dual-exhaust engine |
6467442, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Direct injection variable valve timing engine control system and method |
6470869, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Direct injection variable valve timing engine control system and method |
6477832, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method for improved performance of a vehicle having an internal combustion engine |
6481199, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Control for improved vehicle performance |
6487849, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling lean-burn engine based upon predicted performance impact and trap efficiency |
6487850, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method for improved engine control |
6487853, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies. Inc. | Method and system for reducing lean-burn vehicle emissions using a downstream reductant sensor |
6490643, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Control method for a vehicle having an engine |
6490856, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Control for improved vehicle performance |
6490860, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Open-loop method and system for controlling the storage and release cycles of an emission control device |
6499293, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for reducing NOx tailpipe emissions of a lean-burn internal combustion engine |
6502387, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for controlling storage and release of exhaust gas constituents in an emission control device |
6523340, | Feb 10 1995 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for diagnosing engine exhaust gas purification system |
6539704, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method for improved vehicle performance |
6539706, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for preconditioning an emission control device for operation about stoichiometry |
6546718, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for reducing vehicle emissions using a sensor downstream of an emission control device |
6553754, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system for controlling an emission control device based on depletion of device storage capacity |
6560527, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Speed control method |
6568177, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for rapid catalyst heating |
6594989, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and apparatus for enhancing fuel economy of a lean burn internal combustion engine |
6601382, | Nov 15 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and apparatus for determining a temperature of an emission catalyst |
6604504, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system for transitioning between lean and stoichiometric operation of a lean-burn engine |
6615577, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system for controlling a regeneration cycle of an emission control device |
6626147, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Control method for a vehicle having an engine |
6629453, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and apparatus for measuring the performance of an emissions control device |
6634328, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Engine method |
6650991, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Closed-loop method and system for purging a vehicle emission control |
6651422, | Aug 24 1998 | Catalyst efficiency detection and heating method using cyclic fuel control | |
6651620, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Engine method |
6691020, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system for optimizing purge of exhaust gas constituent stored in an emission control device |
6691507, | Oct 16 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Closed-loop temperature control for an emission control device |
6694244, | Jun 19 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for quantifying oxygen stored in a vehicle emission control device |
6705284, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Engine method |
6708483, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and apparatus for controlling lean-burn engine based upon predicted performance impact |
6712041, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Engine method |
6715462, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method to control fuel vapor purging |
6725830, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for split ignition timing for idle speed control of an engine |
6729120, | Dec 15 2001 | Daimler AG | Method for operating an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle |
6735938, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method to control transitions between modes of operation of an engine |
6736120, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system of adaptive learning for engine exhaust gas sensors |
6736121, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for air-fuel ratio sensor diagnosis |
6745747, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for air-fuel ratio control of a lean burn engine |
6758185, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method to improve fuel economy in lean burn engines with variable-displacement-like characteristics |
6769398, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Idle speed control for lean burn engine with variable-displacement-like characteristic |
6810659, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for determining emission control system operability |
6843051, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Motor Company | Method and apparatus for controlling lean-burn engine to purge trap of stored NOx |
6860100, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Degradation detection method for an engine having a NOx sensor |
6868827, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for controlling transitions between operating modes of an engine for rapid heating of an emission control device |
6874490, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system of adaptive learning for engine exhaust gas sensors |
6925982, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Overall scheduling of a lean burn engine system |
6945225, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Speed control method |
6945227, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Direct injection variable valve timing engine control system and method |
6948310, | Oct 01 2002 | Southwest Research Institute | Use of a variable valve actuation system to control the exhaust gas temperature and space velocity of aftertreatment system feedgas |
6955155, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for controlling transitions between operating modes of an engine for rapid heating of an emission control device |
6962139, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Speed control method |
6978764, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Control method for a vehicle having an engine |
6990799, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method of determining emission control system operability |
7000588, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Engine method |
7007457, | Jan 31 2003 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for monitoring the light-off performance of an exhaust gas catalytic converter system |
7007464, | Aug 26 1999 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Catalyst warming control-apparatus |
7032572, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for controlling an engine to obtain rapid catalyst heating |
7047932, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method to improve fuel economy in lean burn engines with variable-displacement-like characteristics |
7059112, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Degradation detection method for an engine having a NOx sensor |
7069903, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Idle speed control for lean burn engine with variable-displacement-like characteristic |
7111450, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for controlling the temperature of an emission control device |
7117847, | Oct 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
7155901, | Apr 15 2003 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Catalyst temperature control on an electrically throttled engine |
7168239, | Jun 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system for rapid heating of an emission control device |
7194854, | Mar 17 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method for improved performance of a vehicle having an internal combustion engine |
7290527, | Jan 18 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
7299689, | Sep 23 2003 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles SA | Process and device for determining the internal temperature of a catalytic converter of a vehicle equipped with a heat engine |
7367316, | Oct 10 2006 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
7398762, | Dec 18 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
7703439, | Oct 04 2007 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
7707821, | Aug 24 1998 | Control methods for improved catalytic converter efficiency and diagnosis | |
7824099, | Nov 29 2007 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Accurate gas temperature estimation at transient conditions based on temperature sensor readings |
7841168, | Jun 22 2004 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Estimation of the temperature of a catalytic converter and corresponding applications |
7886523, | Aug 24 1998 | Control methods for improved catalytic converter efficiency and diagnosis | |
8209963, | May 20 2008 | Caterpillar Inc. | Integrated engine and exhaust after treatment system and method of operating same |
8251044, | Dec 18 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
8371264, | Jul 14 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
8671909, | Jul 14 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Vehicle control system |
8863497, | Aug 24 1998 | Control methods for improved catalytic converter efficiency and diagnosis | |
9371762, | Jun 01 2012 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Catalyst protection device and catalyst protection method for internal combustion engine |
9719451, | Mar 12 2015 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Exhaust purification system of internal combustion engine |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3090041, | |||
3466645, | |||
3626909, | |||
4201161, | Oct 17 1977 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Control system for internal combustion engine |
4383456, | Sep 25 1975 | Apparatus using a continuously variable ratio transmission to improve fuel economy | |
4393837, | Aug 06 1979 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Spark timing control system for an internal combustion engine |
4541367, | Feb 18 1972 | Owen, Wickersham & Erickson, P.C. | Combustion and pollution control system |
4633838, | Apr 13 1984 | Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo K.K. | Method and system for controlling internal-combustion engine |
4656829, | Jan 27 1986 | GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | System for predicting catalytic converter temperature |
4915079, | May 07 1988 | Lucas Industries public limited company | Adaptive control system for an internal combustion engine and method of operating an internal combustion engine |
5136514, | Dec 15 1989 | Landis & Gyr Betriebs AG | Tariff arrangement with secure bidirectional interface |
5136517, | Sep 12 1990 | FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for inferring barometric pressure surrounding an internal combustion engine |
5150690, | Sep 29 1989 | TELEFLEX GFI CONTROL SYSTEMS L P | Flow control system |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 15 1994 | Ford Motor Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 15 1994 | CULLEN, MICHAEL JOHN | FORD MOTOR COMPANY OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, SUITE 911 | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006942 | /0499 | |
Feb 15 1994 | LEWIS, WOODROW JR | FORD MOTOR COMPANY OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, SUITE 911 | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006942 | /0499 | |
Feb 15 1994 | WEYBURNE, MICHAEL ALAN | FORD MOTOR COMPANY OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, SUITE 911 | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006942 | /0499 | |
Feb 15 1994 | DE LA SALLE, STEPHEN | FORD MOTOR COMPANY OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, SUITE 911 | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006942 | /0499 | |
Feb 15 1994 | MARTIN, TODD A | FORD MOTOR COMPANY OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, SUITE 911 | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006942 | /0499 | |
Mar 01 1997 | FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION | FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011467 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 12 1998 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 15 2002 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 26 2006 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 16 1998 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 16 1998 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 16 1999 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 16 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 16 2002 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 16 2002 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 16 2003 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 16 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 16 2006 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 16 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 16 2007 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 16 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |